RE: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

> Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > -Travis "being hypocritical on the outside to >> > > make a point" Edmunds > >Debbi > >Using Mr. Pointy As Justification? Maru;) > I hope you're talking about my index finger! > -Travis "Mr. Poin

RE: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 15:44:40 -0700 (PDT) > -Travis "being hypo

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 18:22:20 -0500 - Original Messag

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:24:40 -0500 The last Vatican financial stat

RE: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

> Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I really should add something more though. You > > > say that the Christianity > > > (which, like it or not IS based upon the > > > teachings of Jesus)...

RE: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 15:44:40 -0700 (PDT) > Travis Edmunds <[EMAI

Re: Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

At 05:44 PM 6/3/04, Deborah Harrell wrote: Moreover, Jesus was quite anti-hierarchical in his behavior [...] Did he wear fancy clothes, drive the latest chariot, sup from golden chalices, hoist a mighty sword? Did He wear a pinky ring? Did He drive a brand new car? Did His wife wear furs and di

Jesus-anity (was: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out)

> Travis Edmunds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DISCLAIMER: I'm a rather agnostic fellow who has > some major problems with > organized religion. I think that should clear up any > potential misunderstandings below. > I really should add something more though. You say > that the Christianity >

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:03:55 -0700 Dave "Saving my Hissy Fit for Worthier Causes"

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Folks said: Organized religion is hypocrisy at it's finest. There is some truth to that, but I must say that pointing it out seems to make things worse for the most part. How so? Aint nothing worse than a devout believer feeling self righteous and defensive and throwing a hissy in your general di

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:44 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > At 05:00 PM 5/7/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote: >

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:53 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > >From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Rep

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 05:00 PM 5/7/2004 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >But when one describes themselves as a "Christian" without any other >qualifier or asks if you are a "Christian" without any other >qualifier, more than likely they are Souther

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:49 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > >From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Rep

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:53:27 -0500 At 08:50 AM 5/19/04, Travis Edmunds wrote: From

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 15:15:22 -0700 Travis Edmunds wrote: ... if they did not teach the actual teachings of Jesus, which is what the Catholic Church is very specifically based upon), and states that one must be repenta

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:19:19 -0500 - Original Message - Fr

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:53 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > >Maybe someone here knows, but I thought the Vatican's riches had quite

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:09:42 -0500 - Original Messag

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 08:50 AM 5/19/04, Travis Edmunds wrote: From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:27:48 -0500 At 02:55

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 17:27:48 -0500 At 02:55 PM 5/18/04, Travis Edmunds wrote: From: N

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 02:55 PM 5/18/04, Travis Edmunds wrote: From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:29:07 -0700 Travis Edmun

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Travis Edmunds wrote: ... if they did not teach the actual teachings of Jesus, which is what the Catholic Church is very specifically based upon), and states that one must be repentant at heart. Where does that idea, that "must," come from? What authority? Cite, please. I'm curious to hear

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: Nick Arnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:29:07 -0700 Travis Edmunds wrote: This is funny. Yes, it is decide

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

William T Goodall wrote: So which of the ~1000 cults are you speaking from Nick? I'm Lutheran, but that's my church, not my faith. It is somewhat ironic, I think, that people who criticize "religion" fail to make distinctions among "religion," "church" and "faith." Of course, those words have

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 08:11 PM 5/11/04, William T Goodall wrote: On 11 May 2004, at 6:29 pm, Nick Arnett wrote: Travis Edmunds wrote: This is funny. Yes, it is decidedly unchristian to give much thought to people who *sin*, or to people of other religions (meaning that every religion is THE religion) going to H

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

On 11 May 2004, at 6:29 pm, Nick Arnett wrote: Travis Edmunds wrote: This is funny. Yes, it is decidedly unchristian to give much thought to people who *sin*, or to people of other religions (meaning that every religion is THE religion) going to Hell, Hades, the 'fiery deeps', or whatever you

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 12:29 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > Travis Edmunds wrote: > > > > This is

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Travis Edmunds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 10:43 AM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > > Organized religion is hypocrisy at it's finest. There is som

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 6:05 AM Subject: RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > From: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Travis Edmunds wrote: This is funny. Yes, it is decidedly unchristian to give much thought to people who *sin*, or to people of other religions (meaning that every religion is THE religion) going to Hell, Hades, the 'fiery deeps', or whatever you want to call it. Although...on second thought I

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:48:50 -0500 I don't think th

RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

> From: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Untrue John. > Christian describes a multitude of varying forms of belief. > Southern Baptists are just one brand on the shelf. > > Frex...and correct me if I am wrong, but Catholics are a larger > set of Christians in America than Southern

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Old fashioned traditional marriage http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/opinion/tolestom/?name=Toles&date=20040331 gary ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Nick said: > Besides, we Christians, as a group, really don't need *any* > help at this sort of thing. But perhaps I'm just being silly. Silly Christian. Chick's are for kids! ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 04:31 PM 5/7/04, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > Julia > > > >who got cheesed off on the whole "you're going to hell" bit in college > >due to one particularly vocal individual (and I'll spare the details > >unless pressed for them) > > Sorry . . . Debbi alr

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 05:00 PM 5/7/04, Robert Seeberger wrote: --===1477119760== - Original Message - From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:52 PM Subject: RE: New Hate-Mongering C

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 04:31 PM 5/7/04, Julia Thompson wrote: "Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 07:07 PM 5/6/04, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > >It seems to me that the vast majority of christians never give thought > >to who (other than themselves) might be going to hell, > > You must not live in Southern Baptist t

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Horn, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 12:52 PM Subject: RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > From: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 07:07 PM 5/6/04, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > > > > >It seems to me that the vast majority of christians never give thought > >to who (other than themselves) might be going to hell, > > You must not live in Southern Baptist territory. > > The local fish wrapper (I

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Mike Lee wrote: Sometimes I think Jack Chick is really a minion of Satan sent to make Christians look silly. I don't think Satan makes Christians look silly. I think Satan makes Christians look self-righteous, which would leave making Christians look silly up to God... and I can see how that co

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

On 7 May 2004, at 8:30 pm, Mike Lee wrote: The Fool has his knickers in a twist: Subject: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out This is indescribable: <<http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1052/1052_01.asp>> Homophobe apologists (like JDG), only empower people like Chick. Oh,

RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

The Fool has his knickers in a twist: > Subject: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > This is indescribable: > > <<http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1052/1052_01.asp>> > > Homophobe apologists (like JDG), only empower people like Chick. Oh, for C

RE: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

> From: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > But I think that if one says "Christians" one is speaking most > generally, unless one uses modifiers to specify a certain group of > christians. > Southern Baptists and their beliefs do not on the whole typify > Christianity. But when one desc

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "Ronn!Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 7:31 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out At 07:07 PM 5/6/04, Robert Seeberger wro

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 07:07 PM 5/6/04, Robert Seeberger wrote: --===0939995837== - Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:39 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:39 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > > Either that or Tom Beck supports denying the vote to C

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

- Original Message - From: "JDG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:39 PM Subject: Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out > At 05:12 PM 5/6/2004 -0400 Tom Beck wrote: > >I have

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

At 05:12 PM 5/6/2004 -0400 Tom Beck wrote: >I have a friend who is devoutly Catholic and yet fervently supports >Bush, even after Bush made a speech at Bob Jones University (where, >according to their Web site, they pray for the release of Catholics >from "the false cult that has enslaved the

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Actually, so I understand, Chick is virulently anti-Catholic as well. He think's John is going to Hell equally with the homosexuals... I have a friend who is devoutly Catholic and yet fervently supports Bush, even after Bush made a speech at Bob Jones University (where, according to their Web

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

Oh. From the subject line I was expecting another treatise on incompetent mothers . . . -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

> Homophobe apologists (like JDG), only empower people > like Chick. Actually, so I understand, Chick is virulently anti-Catholic as well. He think's John is going to Hell equally with the homosexuals... Damon, who plays D&D so obviously will see John down there... = ---

New Hate-Mongering Chick Tract is out

This is indescribable: <> Homophobe apologists (like JDG), only empower people like Chick. " To the religious mind, not being right in advance in all cases is a sign that the basic idea is incorrect. There have been many surprises as we