> > 2. His main source of intelligence about Iraq
was
> > not what all you are quoting,
> > but was from the Iraq Ex-patriots who fed him
> > completely false information.
> > Ex=patriots who were being paid $450,000 per
> year
> > from the US treasury.
> Yes we didnt have spies on t
Hey kids, new address is as follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't mess around on that email addy if you can please. Also:
Timothy Heald
Bco 3-116th INF
APO AE 09354-9998
Anyway I'll talk to you all again soon.
Tim
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Set
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
>
> 1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich
> - placing the burden on the
> middle class for generations.
> Government spending continues unabated. F
ok, Tony, I did a search for max2k4 on Baltimore digital city site, no where to be found. Michael, you could drag me if you can, fyi, I'm like over 500 pound, nicknamed gorilla :) Don
>he aint that scary, don, dont let him fool ya ;)
>
>sike, he's cool...and i like guiness, and ill be @ max2k4 :)
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
>
> 1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich
> - placing the burden on the
> middle class for generations.
> Government spending continues unabated. For
> reversing the prior trend of Pay
> as you go, to massive d
Yeah. gotta agree with you on that one. I would assume that they had that
list already, plus a whole bunch more that aren't on that list.
It's especially scary since a good number of those targets are General
Dynamics. (the company I work for was just acquired by them). So that hit's
a little clo
Freedom of speech man!
hehe
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:21 PM
Subject: msnbc, excellent terrorist research tool
MSNBC ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5569979/
look at the "Potential Amer
Well you are not forced to say it or believe in it (if you are, then that is not wrong and possibly illegal!). Using that logic, i can just say...there are people on this earth who believe in God, implying that not believing in a God is incorrect, let's get rid of these people!
I hope you dont se
That is pretty nifty.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:53:56 -0400, Erika L. Walker-Arnold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bruceclay.com/searchenginerelationshipchart.htm
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donatio
I've said it before but I always follow the most basic security rule: always
assume that your enemy is smarter than you are.
Not talking about things like this potentially hurt you much more than it
could ever help them.
Jim Davis
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 0
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
And Federalizing the airport screeners which violates the 4th amendment.
Interesting you mention that, now that they are seeing that the Federalization
is not working as intended, they are now asking to go back to private screening
contractors
Viewing the national economy as a whole, the figures are more like 3 to 3.5
million jobs lost due to the downturn, and since Bush took office, there have
been less than a million new jobs created, so there is still a net loss of jobs
in the overall economy.. Hardly a scenario to brag about
Actuall
http://bruceclay.com/searchenginerelationshipchart.htm
Cheers,
Erika
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:56:41 -0500, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons to vote out Bush:
> 20. Masc. items, The Patriot Act, The prisoner handing, The anti-constitution
> Attorney General, and more.
Don't forget: Covertly detained and held incommunicado US citizens.
And when confronte
So they were able to realize an extra $142 for the year in tax savings.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Also, here is other information from the websi
i as well...those were scary days, i still have nightmares of long
range nukes, flying over norway, and landing in nyc.
but the point is this...why put it there?
come the heck on...enough already.
why make it any easier?
i guess its nothing worse than the anarchists cookbook that is all
over th
Dude, that's all old hat. All of those facilities are well known. And
talking about this stuff is nothing new. It's about fearmongering. I
remember growing up in the shadow of the cold war that newspapers, TV,
magazines, and even our teachers would have maps about where the ICBMs
would fall. The on
he aint that scary, don, dont let him fool ya ;)
sike, he's cool...and i like guiness, and ill be @ max2k4 :)
see ya on bourbon skreet!
tw
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:09:20 -0400, Michael T. Tangorre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Drag Michael T along? LOL I pitty da fool that talks that jive. :-)
>
I'm with Jim. I figured the tooltip wasn't "spec" per se, but it is
_very_ handy.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:44:34 -0400, Jim Davis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True - but it is a good behavior. ;^) I also like the fact that IE
> displays the alt text in the image frame while the image is downloading
But is that something that any President can control?
With a national economy, companies will move new plants to a location where
it is more economically sound. They open a Toyota plant here, but they close
one there. They close an MCI call center, but they open one there.
The local effects suck,
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok Sam here's my source. They've got a nice little
> table that lists it all
> sorts of ways.
>
>
http://www.taxfoundation.org/prtopincometable.html#TotalAdjustedGross
>
> I'm not sure what you're getting at because
> according to your numbers, the
Drag Michael T along? LOL I pitty da fool that talks that jive. :-)
> OK, tell me a cool pub in your area, I may as well stop by
> for a beer some time. Drag Michael T. Tangorre along if he allows :)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[
The is from their finance division - is I think is a part of their bankruptcy
reorganization. It was just on my mind. last week there was a company that laid
off several hundred workers, and another the week before. In fact since the
first of the year, just here there has been layoffs of around 6
Also, here is other information from the website you sent out:
Proportionately, the top-earning 25 percent of taxpayers earned more than 65
percent of the nation's income and paid more than three out of every four
dollars collected by the federal income tax (77%) in 2001. There were 32.2
million t
>ugly?
>
>what? my outlook? come on man.
>wtf can someone learn behind a monitor?
>how many keys they can hit in a minute? go out.
>learn about people, play a sport, do somethign outside, its much
>more entertaining, and educational than a computer.
>
>but, then again, i guess i am ugly.
All rig
Something interesting, based on these numbers, the tax rate went up for the
top 1%, in 2000 the top 1% paid 27.45%, in 2001 the top 1% paid 27.50
I wasn't aware of that.
_
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:37 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Ke
ok Sam here's my source. They've got a nice little table that lists it all
sorts of ways.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/prtopincometable.html#TotalAdjustedGross
I'm not sure what you're getting at because according to your numbers, the
bottom 50% only make 13.81% of all income, so how does that r
Yeah, seem like pretty smart people if you ask me.
But hey, I'm from Kentucky, where our current slogan is: "At least we aren't
Tennessee"
_
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:15 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
What
One thing I have a question with here, is it possible the reason MCI is
laying people off because they are losing subscribers, because of the
quality of their service?
I don't know, but the fact that a company is losing jobs doesn't directly
mean it's because there is total economic problem, compa
MSNBC ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5569979/
look at the "Potential American Targets" interactive
piece @ the end.
SOMEONE SHOULD FINE THEM, this is anti-american.
WTF???
--
tony
Tony Weeg
human.
email: tonyweeg [at] gmail [dot] com
blog: http://www.revolutionwebdes
What do you expect - I mentioned the education record, didn't I?
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
Save a horse, ride a cowboy!
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Love this one Democratic party button I saw a photo of
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease
larry
--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:47 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
> >
> > Top 50% of wage earners pay 96.03% of all federal
> > income t
Love this one Democratic party button I saw a photo of
Stop Mad Cowboy Disease
larry
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:15:01 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, you and I live in different pools of knowledge. Example: I just came
> back from a Toby Keith concert. Cowboy way is the
If I remember right, having read a bunch of articles on it and did
some researching myself, the effort to add thephrase "Under God" was
launched by a republican congressmen on the urging of the Knights of
Columbus to show that the US was different from those heathen godless
commie countries.
larry
Reasons to vote out Bush:
1. Record Setting deficit with tax cuts for the rich - placing the burden on the
middle class for generations.
Government spending continues unabated. For reversing the prior trend of Pay
as you go, to massive debt which will absorb an increasing portion of
productivity
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:47 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>
> Top 50% of wage earners pay 96.03% of all federal
> income tax. Should it be 100%?
Sam, you really should get another so
While personally I find the whole "anybody but Bush" argument distasteful I
do think it's valid.
The main point of democracy is to try to elect those people that will best
suit your interests. Right now a lot of people feel that "anybody" can do
that better than Bush. What's not being said is th
That would be cool if we lived in that world, however what was the last time
your Senator asked your opinion?
You vote for a representative who in general agrees with you, a person who
will tend to agree with your ideas.
In North Korea, Kim Jong Ill, makes the choice, there is not congress that
i
>What has Bush done to show that he deserves to stay in and lead? Let's
>recap:
>Gave the wealthiest Americans a tax break while the middle class continues
>to struggle.. Not to mention the less fortunate of the US still get
shafted.
Interesting, I got a tax cut, Kerry hasn't proposed anything t
Not this Texan, or his family.
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
voted for him.
_
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and
I'm really not a fan of voting for people based on what other countries
think.
I don't like the idea of the US giving in to what the rest of the world
wants, if the US wants to do it, then we do it.
If the US wants to go to war, if popular support says go to war, if congress
says here is the mone
True - but it is a good behavior. ;^) I also like the fact that IE
displays the alt text in the image frame while the image is downloading.
Neither of these are required by the specs, but neither is prohibited
either. FireFox could learn a few things from IE (and the other-way-round
of course).
Kerry did miss one vote where the bill lost by one, it was for the extension
of the unemployment benefits.
_
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
>From what I remember from high school
Well, sure they should vote for their constituency, however the question is
how does the rest of the country feel about the ideas of his constituency.
You are only going to vote for a particular candidate if you agree with
them, so its not like you are going to always vote exactly the same way the
I don't really like the idea that he was on the intel committee and rarely
showed up, but I don't know what is the norm for senators, it seems to me
that they get paid to be in Washington and be at the Senate, but I don't
know.
_
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Something that has annoyed me, I sent an email to the Kerry camp asking how
he would get one of his platforms through, its been a few weeks, and I have
heard nothing back what so ever.
That kinda made up my mind.
Specifically, I asked how Kerry planned to reduce the family insurance
premiums by $
Do you not see how sad that it?
Your only reason for voting for Kerry is because he isn't Bush, your only
response about these questions is that it can't be worse than it is now.
If you are basing your vote on that idea, then democracy is lost, the idea
that you care more for voting this guy out
Well, the people of Texas seemed to think he had a pretty good record, they
voted for him.
_
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Don't forget - Bush had no Washington experience and als
Omygoodness!
Is that new? I'd need to order a LOT of cookies to make shipping
worthwhile, and I don't need that many cookies tempting me, but I love
the bee cookie.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:10:40 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I've wasted an entire day on this and o
This whole loved by the world thing is overrated.
I agree with what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach has to say:
...
AMERICA IS hated by the nations of the world almost
entirely due to its support of Israel and the war in
Iraq. The United States is the great champion of
Israel and is therefore loathed by a
"Under God" was added to the pledge in 1954.
"In God we Trust" was added to currency for the first time in 1908 but
wasn't added to paper money until the 1950's.
Jim Davis
_
From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject:
Andy Ousterhout wrote:
> I believe that the phrase "under god" was a relatively late addition
> ~1950 to
> the pledge. However the pledge is not law.
Correct on both counts. IIRC, the text was added as a Joint Resolution
of Congress. It was brought up as an example of something official with
What do you mean by "ignore"? What behavior are you expecting? The
only required behavior for the alt text is that it be shown when the
image can not be displayed. The tooltip-like behavior of IE is a
behavior that MS invented.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:29:42 -0500, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PRO
For anyone out there who has read DC's Transmetropolitan, doesn't Bush kinda
remind you of "The Bear" and Edwards of "The Smiler"?
(I am a dem voting for the John^2 ticket, i just thought it was amusing)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
DEBKAfile's terror experts find two al Qaeda operatives held in
Pakistan unlikely sources of up-to-date intelligence on terror plots
for US financial centers and UK.
Organization is too compartmented for single operatives to have access
to that many secrets â especially when, like Ghailani and K
I believe that the phrase "under god" was a relatively late addition ~1950 to
the pledge. However the pledge is not law.
OK, I've wasted an entire day on this and other posts. Got to sell something.
Anybody want some delicious butter cookies?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [
> Implied by the law? no way!
Implied by the Pledge itself. Including the text "under God" implies
that there is, in fact, at least one god, and probably only one God
(note capitilizaion) depending on interpretation.
--Ben
> > See there's a difference. You got in trouble for NOT SAYING IT.
>couldnt it be, though, that the changing of the guard here, bush out -
>kerry in, would aid in our foreign policy. it would send the LARGEST
>message to the world. far louder than any incumbent group's policy
>shift. they dont like bush, no one does, and as the days go on, their
>anger is fuele
Benefit of the doubt.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:44 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
>Sad statement about the Democratic party
>that the best they could come up with was a warm body.
Because afaik it should use Title over alt...
Im pretty sure MAC clients are the same...
There was a UI option (which is probably embedded in the about:config
now) that will tell FireFox to treat ALT as title.
I beleive it still uses the ALT for when the image/control cannot be loaded...
HTH
-
>Sad statement about the Democratic party
>that the best they could come up with was a warm body.
are you sure he's a warm body? ;-)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Thanks.
I agree to disagree with you at this point.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:21 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
Yeah, see that's exactly the problem. I'm personally not fond of the
Implied by the law? no way!
- Original Message -
From: Ben Doom
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Religious oppression in action
> See there's a difference. You got in trouble for NOT SAYING IT. Now
> that is something I am against!
This may be a FAQ, and it has something I've noticed for some time
now, but just haven't confirmed it. Is there any reason why Firefox
seems to ignore ALT tags for images? TITLE tags work, but it is kind
of a pain to use both.
--
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscr
> See there's a difference. You got in trouble for NOT SAYING IT. Now
> that is something I am against! it's not the pledge of allegiance that
> should be changed, but the people who are forcing you to say "under
> God". Please don't take it out on the pledge of allegiance!
There is still t
Yeah, see that's exactly the problem. I'm personally not fond of the
direction that Bush is leading and I'm more than ready to unhitch the
mule. Kerry seems to buck around a bit, and occasionally goes the
wrong direction, but seems to be a sure and steady bet.
BTW, welcome back.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2
And make sure in the letter you let your representative know that if the liquor store is still closed the next time, you intend to stop by his house for a beer Sunday morning.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/02/04 05:14PM >>>
Sounds like time to throw a chair through a window. Or maybe wri
See there's a difference. You got in trouble for NOT SAYING IT. Now that is something I am against! it's not the pledge of allegiance that should be changed, but the people who are forcing you to say "under God". Please don't take it out on the pledge of allegiance!
>So I think we can just agr
Sounds like time to throw a chair through a window. Or maybe write a
letter to your local representative. One or the other.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:21:26 -0400, John Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's right I was forced by laws written in the past to conform to
> someone elses
This thread appears aptly named.
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:41:34 -0400, Tony Weeg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or better yet, leaked misinformed information solely meant to throw us
> off, for real attacks in opposing areas of the states...
>
> or better yet, attack small town america, get th
I am looking for some sign that Kerry actually has a perspective that he
believes and and works to sell it. As opposed to going with the majority.
Leaders help show their constituents a new and better way of moving forward.
They are out ahead, pulling everyone along with them, not being pushed.
A
> I'm in the crowd that wants the Pledge of Allegiance in School as it is,
> not because I'm religious, but because it never really bothered anybody
> in the first place, except for money hungry lawyers. You can just
> tolerate it, you can fight against it, or you can be really anal about
> it
What would that message be? And I guess it depends on what your foreign
policy would be. It would certainly add some policy. Just not sure if it
would help one I would care about. Ultimately, we must make Iraq work. When
it does, everything else will be better. Whether we like it or not, succ
--- "Tangorre, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What has Bush done to show that he deserves to stay
> in and lead? Let's
> recap:
>
> Gave the wealthiest Americans a tax break while the
> middle class continues
> to struggle.. Not to mention the less fortunate of
> the US still get shafted.
Anyone seen Bowling for Columbine? If you have, I just wanna say, Canada is a nice place!! :) I want neighbors like that! I dont want to be afraid of someone jacking my house hehe.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Weeg
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:41 PM
This is just me, I love beer, i would just be like, "oh well I guess I'll wait till noon to buy the beer" I wouldn't really go as far as making a complaint, because waitint gtill noon to buy beer on sunday, vs. having a fit a religious people. Buying beer after noon wins! I mean it's not like
or better yet, leaked misinformed information solely meant to throw us
off, for real attacks in opposing areas of the states...
or better yet, attack small town america, get those people scared to
death, that would really send us into a tailspin.
i really dont want to live here downwind from dc.
wrong.
if i elect someone, they are to listen to the constituency, and vote
based on that.
if they arent, i live in north korea, and who cares wtf i say.
but we are here, in america, not toby keiths america, my america, your
america, our america.
god dammit i fuking hate country music
go g
Wanna know who gets heard?... The people with money, plain and simple.
Remember the Golden Rule?... "He who has the gold, makes the rules".
> Uh...that sounds like you aren't advocating for the
> representative government that we should have and instead
> want to edge towards a totalitarian one.
Uh...that sounds like you aren't advocating for the representative
government that we should have and instead want to edge towards a
totalitarian one.
I'm guessing that's not what you're actually advocating, but there is
something to be said for an exec that listens to what people want.
-Kevin
O
> Sorry, you and I live in different pools of knowledge.
> Example: I just came back from a Toby Keith concert. Cowboy
> way is the American way
Toby Keith is an entertainer, what does that have to do with the Cowboy way?
Also, a lot of country singers are form Canada nowadays, so maybe we co
I thought Joe Klein's article had some good insights.
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ousterhout
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
I think I read it and got nothing from it. I'll try again. Perhaps
couldnt it be, though, that the changing of the guard here, bush out -
kerry in, would aid in our foreign policy. it would send the LARGEST
message to the world. far louder than any incumbent group's policy
shift. they dont like bush, no one does, and as the days go on, their
anger is fueled mor
brobborb wrote:
> >So it'd be okay to make eating pork illegal, and enforce that when
> >necessary, so long as no one's religion requires the eating of pork?
>
> Well of course, if no one is affected by that law, then why would they
> care. I'm sure there are alot of blue laws here that are we
That's what followers do. Not what leaders do. They sell their beliefs
effectively.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
and one step further jim, a presidenti
I've been having a parallel discussion with another group. Consensus:
Nothing pro or con to be found in his record. All and all, very non-descript.
Best I can tell, is his last leadership role was in the 70's.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I'll look at it tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Kerry's record in Senate
I wasn't posting it as a for/against comment. Just information. It's
worth noting that the lis
Sorry, you and I live in different pools of knowledge. Example: I just came
back from a Toby Keith concert. Cowboy way is the American way
And I agree that in many cases change is good. Perhaps at the last election,
before we knew that Clinton excesses where going to tube the economy and 9/11.
Hmm line monster.
http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=S0421103
_
From: Sandy Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Kerry's record in Senate
This might be a better voting record for Kerry, gives a lot more information
>So it'd be okay to make eating pork illegal, and enforce that when
>necessary, so long as no one's religion requires the eating of pork?
Well of course, if no one is affected by that law, then why would they care. I'm sure there are alot of blue laws here that are weird and prolly dumb, but I o
LOL
> I think this is the third or fourth time this joke's been
> posted and the same thing always annoys every time: I know
> that jokes require suspension of disbelief, but this one
> requires me to assume that Bush is quick-witted.
> There's only so much absurdity my brain can handle. ;^)
>
Um. boobies?
Jim Davis
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Religious oppression in action
Wait Ben, if we voted to make him a eunuch first, what will a sex change
entail?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscript
We should be able to compare Kerry's (and Edward's for that matter)
participation relative to other campaigning senators for this year and other
senators in general for previous years. It would be interesting to see if
Kerry's participation was actually affected by his campaigning.
Since Bush nev
I think I read it and got nothing from it. I'll try again. Perhaps it has
lots of worthless info or I was brain-dead. Both are possible and perhaps
probable. I'll let you know
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 1:57 PM
I think this is the third or fourth time this joke's been posted and the
same thing always annoys every time: I know that jokes require suspension of
disbelief, but this one requires me to assume that Bush is quick-witted.
There's only so much absurdity my brain can handle. ;^)
Jim Davis
From: J
From what I remember from high school (my best friend's Mom was a state rep and worked for US Rep Sam Gedjenson), the longer you are in the house or senate, the more likely you are to miss votes.
This is due to realizing their vote doesn't really count unless it is a close vote. They are often in
and one step further jim, a presidentially-campaigning senator. also,
isnt it the job of any delegate to vote as his/her constituency
dictates? they are just representatives of our states/legislative
districts. so they vote how their underlings want them to vote?
right? so why blame any of them
Was there supposed to be a link with that?
-Kevin
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:39:49 -0400, Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might be a better voting record for Kerry, gives a lot more information
> too.
>
> _
>
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 0
Wait Ben, if we voted to make him a eunuch first, what will a sex change
entail?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 2:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Religious oppression in action
>
> brobborb wrote:
> > For your first
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
