United States
> while being "not too bright".shares that moniker.
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 200
sorry. Just saw this. No relation as far as I know, though we never
found out what happened to my great-uncle Andrew after he emigrated to
the States :) Seriously, Tierney is a fairly common Irish name. While
it's pretty exotic in New Mexico, there are probably several pages of
them in the New Yor
> Brian wrote:
> I've gotta ask though, is Kerry any better?
Yes, that's a good question. Here's what we know with Mr. Bush:
1.) Given the chance Mr. Bush will spend irresponsibly and has proven
it. For example he signed a bill to spend federal tax dollars to help
build an Indian casino in Mic
Heh, i think i struck a chord :)
I've gotta ask though, is Kerry any better?
I mean, the tax cuts are only costly because there were no spending cuts to
correspond with them! Why can't we keep the current tax cuts, and chop
spending to coincide? Kerry says he'll repeal the tax cuts, but what abou
> Brian wrote:
> I dunno about the upper 2%, but what i've paid in taxes this year is f***ng
> ridiculous. Why can't spending deficits be resolved through less spending,
> instead of more taxing
BELLS! TRUMPETS! FANFARE!!! WO! WOOO HOOO! AMEN BROTHER!
LEAD US OUT OF TEMPTATION AND
> what kind of beer do you think he'd order?
Busch...duh...simple, watered down, easy to remember...
;-)
--
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~
*looking at my pay stub*
I dunno about the upper 2%, but what i've paid in taxes this year is f***ng
ridiculous. Why can't spending deficits be resolved through less spending,
instead of more taxing
>
> Nobody thinks Reaganomics worked, at least nobody credible that's being
honest.
>
> The c
> Sam wrote:
> Years after Reagan was president they Democrats called
> him the worst saying we'll suffer for years from
> Reaganomics. Eventually they agreed what he did
> worked.
Nobody thinks Reaganomics worked, at least nobody credible that's being honest.
The core of Reagan's plan was the so
No, but there are still 99 cases left over from the initial run of 100.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
Right.
I'm refering to the history books that will be written
in the future. So it was my opinion and I thought it
was well founded.
-sm
--- Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So actually no books said that Carter and Clinton
> were the worst presidents
> in modern history?
>
> Jim Davis
That's the thing they loved the man Clinton but now
that he's on the back his actions are being judged.
Years after Reagan was president they Democrats called
him the worst saying we'll suffer for years from
Reaganomics. Eventually they agreed what he did
worked.
With Clinton they love the man no
So actually no books said that Carter and Clinton were the worst presidents
in modern history?
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 12:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
I'm basing
Well I don't think that's true but that's for another
thread.
I'm sure it's been done here but if not we can argue
after next week.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um lets see, Clinton presided over the largest and
> longest economic
> expansion in US history, managed to e
Im basing I on Clintons book "My Lies", I mean "My
Life". :)
When that book came out all the critics attacked his
presidency. Worst of all was the NY Times claiming he
was trying to re-write history to save his image. When
the NY Times rips Clinton you know the gig is up. I
don't think there were
Do they still make Billy Beer?
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think Mr. Bush drinks anymore but, if he
> did, what kind of
> beer do you think he'd order? Lone Star? Shiner?
>
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address A
Wrong. Goodnight.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
> Andy wrote:
>That leads me to think that he would
> only operate unilaterally after the damage had been done.
The idea of Preemption was discredited by the war in Iraq; it will
only work with perfect intelligence which we obviously
> Andy wrote:
>That leads me to think that he would
> only operate unilaterally after the damage had been done.
The idea of Preemption was discredited by the war in Iraq; it will
only work with perfect intelligence which we obviously don't have.
Without that, Preemption just drains your resources
Ah.
I wouldn't use the word faith. But I do believe that the strongest leaders
have core beliefs around which they center their decisions. These core
beliefs provide a predictability for those working with them and gives them
the strength to tackle unpleasant and unpopular tasks.
Also, I was re
> Andy wrote:
> Since we disagree on is abilities here, no point in going there. Neither of
> us has facts to give on this. These won't be out and digested for years.
I wasn't writing about Mr. Bush, I was writing about you. I thought
it was interesting that you felt that while personality play
Since we disagree on is abilities here, no point in going there. Neither of
us has facts to give on this. These won't be out and digested for years.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
Does ability to gather facts and make decisions based on good analysis
play a role?
On Wed, 27 Oct
> Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I hear through the grapevine of people who have worked for
> both, they thought Clinton was scary smart and you couldn't help but
> respect him but he was a bit of a stiff while Bush is more of a social
> party guy.
I don't think Mr. Bush drin
ions, perspectives and beliefs matter
> more.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
>
> > Andy wrote:
> > Sorry, not biti
> Really? Which guy would you rather have a beer with?
>From what I hear through the grapevine of people who have worked for
both, they thought Clinton was scary smart and you couldn't help but
respect him but he was a bit of a stiff while Bush is more of a social
party guy.
-Kevin
: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> Andy wrote:
> Sorry, not biting. I'd liked to have a beer with Clinton as well. But I
> wouldn't vote for him.
What red-blooded male wouldn't!
I was just pointing out that you hear that all of the time. The
presidency, to me, is mostly
Sam Morris wrote:
> But your two heros, Carter and Clinton are in the
> books as the worst Presidents in modern times.
>
> -sm
Whoa. I think that Clinton's popular appeal is much like Reagan. Both
are deified by their respective parties. I like both Presidents
similarly but for different rea
> Andy wrote:
> Sorry, not biting. I'd liked to have a beer with Clinton as well. But I
> wouldn't vote for him.
What red-blooded male wouldn't!
I was just pointing out that you hear that all of the time. The
presidency, to me, is mostly a personality contest along with a
personal destruction
> Larry wrote:
> Um lets see, Clinton presided over the largest and longest economic
> expansion in US history, managed to eliminate the deficit,
> substantially changed welfare, has significantly changed the North
> American economy with NAFTA.
Larry, you're forgetting that Bushies don't worry ab
John Kerry actually, I've drank with too many good old boys, like GW
Bush, - as drinking companions they're stone cold boring after 5
minutes. At least Kerry has some intellegence and uses it on occasion.
larry
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:11:21 -0500, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy w
Sorry, not biting. I'd liked to have a beer with Clinton as well. But I
wouldn't vote for him.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> Andy wrote:
Um lets see, Clinton presided over the largest and longest economic
expansion in US history, managed to eliminate the deficit,
substantially changed welfare, has significantly changed the North
American economy with NAFTA.
"... the worst Presidents in modern times."
yes absolutely terrible perfor
> Andy wrote:
> I disagree with your analysis. Becoming a president is not a version of
> Star Search.
Really? Which guy would you rather have a beer with?
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and
Which books?
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
But your two heros, Carter and Clinton are in the
books as the worst Presidents in modern times.
-sm
I disagree with your analysis. Becoming a president is not a version of
Star Search.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
> Andy wrote:
> Yikes. I guess being president of the US is a small achievement. Get
real.
> You can't find many that have been as successful.
Sure they have to wo
But your two heros, Carter and Clinton are in the
books as the worst Presidents in modern times.
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy wrote:
> > Yikes. I guess being president of the US is a
> small achievement. Get real.
> > You can't find many that have been as successful.
> Andy wrote:
> Yikes. I guess being president of the US is a small achievement. Get real.
> You can't find many that have been as successful.
Sure they have to work hard, blah, blah, blah. But they have
thousands of handlers telling them exactly what to do, they just have
to do it. Where's t
Yikes. I guess being president of the US is a small achievement. Get real.
You can't find many that have been as successful.
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott
Further I'd challenge you to find any less successful than Mr. Bush.
~
> Andy wrote:
> No, the real question is what did he do with his life. He has fought and
> won against a difficult decease (remember, it is a decease, not a weakness)
Good point - no argument there.
> become Governor of Texas and then President of the US. So while you
> personally detest him, h
Sam Morris wrote:
> But what's that have to do with Bush and Harvard?
> His dad went to Yale so I can see the legacy theory.
Prescott Bush, His dad was famous, etc. etc. You can't prove these
things so if you think Mr. Bush wasn't a legacy then so be it. But
then I would say you haven't met any
Well - if he fought and won against death... then he's my man!
(Sorry - couldn't resist!)
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
No
No, the real question is what did he do with his life. He has fought and
won against a difficult decease (remember, it is a decease, not a weakness),
become Governor of Texas and then President of the US. So while you
personally detest him, he has been very successful.
Andy
-Original Messag
But what's that have to do with Bush and Harvard?
His dad went to Yale so I can see the legacy theory.
He wasn't rich enough to have influence at Harvard.
-sm
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Please explain?
>
> Legacy typically means that you had a relative that
>
> Sam wrote:
> Please explain?
Legacy typically means that you had a relative that went to the school
so you get a pass on other requirements. This also applies to rich
kids, or kids with influential parents. This is because the school
figures the kid will go on to be handed some big job. Then
Please explain?
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Admitted as a legacy.
>
> larry
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
> Sam wrote:
> But what are Kerry do with his?
1.) Started a business that's still around today.
2.) Became a federal law enforcement official as a prosecutor.
3.) Became a Senator for 20 years.
4.) Married up.
~|
Purchase from
Sam wrote:
> Either way, Harvard is one of the top five schools in
> the world in teaching both management and finance.
> So even a C is a hell of an accomplishment.
No it isn't.
If you're a complete unknown and you get in - it's a huge
accomplishment. If you're a legacy they wrote your applicat
Interesting list of U.S. Presidents by college education:
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/List_of_U.S._Presidents_by_college_education
-Kevin
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF
Just like Flounder :)
- Original Message -
From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
&g
Admitted as a legacy.
larry
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:41:50 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure. Maybe he was talking about Yale.
>
> So where did the C grade story come from?
>
> Either way, Harvard is one of the top five schools in
> the world in teaching both mana
Not at all. The standards are pretty tight. Much higher than what is
required simply to get into Oxford. On the average its a pretty good
guide to achievement.
larry
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:30:52 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without reading all that, I heard you just need a
So in your mind an MBA at one of the top 5 business
schools in the world just isn't as good enough?
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sam wrote:
> > Why don't you admit when you're wrong?
> > You call Bush an idiot and when I show you he has
> a
> > higher IQ then Kerry
>
> Because
But what are Kerry do with his?
--- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andy wrote:
> > Actually not. Can you point to any direct
> correlation between grades and
> > success? If so, how does the correlation define
> success?
>
> Yes, it's not so much that Mr. Bush went to Yale and
> HBS
(no matter how it
was gained).
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:41 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> Andy wrote:
> Actually not. Can you point to any direct correlation between
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
As the old saying goes: the sponsor just opens the door for you, you have
carry yourself through it.
Remember too that most of
I'm not sure. Maybe he was talking about Yale.
So where did the C grade story come from?
Either way, Harvard is one of the top five schools in
the world in teaching both management and finance.
So even a C is a hell of an accomplishment.
--- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam Morris wro
> Andy wrote:
> Actually not. Can you point to any direct correlation between grades and
> success? If so, how does the correlation define success?
Yes, it's not so much that Mr. Bush went to Yale and HBS; he clearly
got in as a legacy. The real question is what did he do with his
education?
T
metimes).
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
Without reading all that, I heard you just need a
respectable person to spon
Without reading all that, I heard you just need a
respectable person to sponsor you and your set.
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you necessarily understand what is
> required to get a
> Rhodes Scholarship. You have to among the top 1 or
> 2% academically, as
> wel
> Sam wrote:
> Why don't you admit when you're wrong?
> You call Bush an idiot and when I show you he has a
> higher IQ then Kerry
Because I don't think I'm wrong. You didn't show me evidence - you
just posted someone's theory based on decades old data. If you want
to believe Mr. Bush has a high
To some extent yes you can, first define Success for me.
larry
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:17:13 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually not. Can you point to any direct correlation between grades and
> success? If so, how does the correlation define success?
>
> Andy
>
> ---
> From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> >
> >
> > What about Clinton? How'd he
good thing.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
I've heard Bush refer to himself as a C student.
-sm
--- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rs.
It just doesn't seem worth it to me.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> But a C+ GPA in grad school is still a C+. It
Actually not. Can you point to any direct correlation between grades and
success? If so, how does the correlation define success?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons
But a C+ GPA in grad school is still a C+. It says he showed up, and
did barely well enough that we can't kick
Sam Morris wrote:
> I've heard Bush refer to himself as a C student.
>
> -sm
So he got a C from Yale AND Harvard? At least he is consistent.
--
2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant.
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion,
I've heard Bush refer to himself as a C student.
-sm
--- Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> > But a C+ GPA in grad school is still a C+. It says
> he showed up, and
> > did barely well enough that we can't kick him out.
> A C+ says a lot
> > about the person in that cas
IQ does not necessarily mean much more than skills at IQ tests. I
would be very interested in seeing Bush's WAIS profiles - the Weschler
Adult Intelligence Scale is used to determine IQ. An overall score is
essentially meaningless. What is more important is the profile - how
the person did on the
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
>
>
> What about Clinton? How'd he do in Oxford?
> >
>
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> But a C+ GPA in grad school is still a C+. It says he showed up, and
> did barely well enough that we can't kick him out. A C+ says a lot
> about the person in that case.
>
My quetion isn't about the value of a C+ at HBS. My question is, "What
was Bush's GPA at HBS?" An
But a C+ GPA in grad school is still a C+. It says he showed up, and
did barely well enough that we can't kick him out. A C+ says a lot
about the person in that case.
larry
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:50:38 -0400, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have evidence of what his grades
Howie Hamlin wrote:
> Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.
>
Yes. Clinton's intelligence has never been questioned. I would be
suprised if anyone questioned his libido too. But that is another
topic. Clinton is probably the last "grew up a regular guy" President
the US will have. Shame.
--
20
Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
What abou
>
> Does anyone have evidence of what his grades were at HBS? I read a
> Salon.com article that interviews one of his former profs. Interesting
> stuff even if it's only one man's opinion.
>
>
The reason that I'm asking is there is a lot of noise on this subject.
Like em or hate em, a degr
Why don't you admit when you're wrong?
You call Bush an idiot and when I show you he has a
higher IQ then Kerry you say it's a different IQ. And
his real IQ is 0.
Every time someone proves you wrong you make up some
little personal experience to back your point of view
or you change the subject rea
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> In this case you may be right. For instance the C+ in Business
> Administration may have been an overestimate of his abilities. For
> instance how many successful private businesses, that were not
> election related, has he run?
>
> I suspect that its not intelligence, alth
hopefully much like the Pet Rock his reign will short
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:18 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> Brian wrote:
> And anyone who thinks you can get to be the Pre
hadnt seen that one.;-)
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:21 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
I think this is pretty funny...
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images
I think this is pretty funny...
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushchimplookalikes.htm
- Original Message -
From: "John Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:10 PM
Subjec
thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:15 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/Bush-Quotes-ngin.htm
http://www.mindspring.com/~mike.wicks/AEBush.html
Ray
At 02
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/Bush-Quotes-ngin.htm
http://www.mindspring.com/~mike.wicks/AEBush.html
Ray
At 02:10 PM 10/27/2004, you wrote:
>nothing to do with the discussion at hand but
>damn, doesnt Bush look alot like Alfred E. Newman? I'm sure somebody
>somewhere
>has done a side-by-side c
nothing to do with the discussion at hand but
damn, doesnt Bush look alot like Alfred E. Newman? I'm sure somebody
somewhere
has done a side-by-side comparison of both of their faces.
~|
Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromed
Actually, Bush did say that he had an intelligence error ( go ahead, laugh)
and that he was looking into it. He said it during the debates. However,
the wolves were baying for raw meat so that didn't suffice.
And Clinton would have been much better off if he'd admitted his error, then
went for a
We'll see if you say the same about Bush as time passes.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: G
Interesting thing about Clinton, at the time the allegations were levelled,
his advisors told him to lie about it, arguing that admitting it immediately
would cost him his presidency. Clinton did wha
> Andy wrote:
> "I could have done better/I made a mistake" statement. Kind of like what we
> wanted from Clinton with the Monica thing - if he'd just said right when it
> came out that he'd made a mistake
Well said - it's never the offense, it's the cover up. Pinging off of
what Brian said ther
ho thinks you can get to be the President of the United
> States
> > > while being "not too bright".shares that moniker.
> > >
> > > >- Original Message -
> > > >From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Interesting thing about Clinton, at the time the allegations were levelled,
his advisors told him to lie about it, arguing that admitting it immediately
would cost him his presidency. Clinton did what Bush didhe followed the
advice of his advisors.
The "if you'd only told us the truth in the b
Gruss,
I also think that there is another reason. If you make a decision based off
of the information at hand at that time and it turns out that the
information was wrong, is that a mistake? One can question the timing --
should we wait for more information -- and that might be viewed as a
mistak
age -
From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> > Brian wrote:
> > That's a lot different than saying "he's not to
> Brian wrote:
> That's a lot different than saying "he's not too bright".
As I said, his real strength is emotional IQ and I think he relies
heavily on that to make decisions. That is, he's a emotional decision
maker rather than quantitative one. This is why he's so unwilling to
admit mistakes.
Actually IQ has very little to with business, social or educational acumen.
Somebody may very well be a genius on IQ tests... but could also be many
things that still make him an awful president. They could be lazy,
overzealous, unsympathetic, fanatical or any of an infinite number of other
negat
27;s a lot different than saying "he's not too bright".
- Original Message -
From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
ROTECTED]>
> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:36 AM
> >Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
> >
>
> > Anybody that thinks Mr. Bush has a higher IQ than Mr. Kerry has a
> > lower IQ than Mr.
> Brian wrote:
> And anyone who thinks you can get to be the President of the United States
> while being "not too bright".shares that moniker.
Mr. Bush's qualifications for President in 2000:
1.) 4 bankrupt businesses followed by one successful investment he was
practically dragged into and
ent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:36 AM
>Subject: Re: Bush higher IQ than Kerry
>
> Anybody that thinks Mr. Bush has a higher IQ than Mr. Kerry has a
> lower IQ than Mr. Bush.
>
> Here's a rich boy with a Harvard MBA that bankrupted 4 businesses and
> never made a dime e
Anybody that thinks Mr. Bush has a higher IQ than Mr. Kerry has a
lower IQ than Mr. Bush.
Here's a rich boy with a Harvard MBA that bankrupted 4 businesses and
never made a dime except when investors lent him money and told him
what to buy with it.
He's not too bright.
All that having been said,
That was based on a test that was before the boozing and coke snorting days. :)
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html
>
> By JOHN TIERNEY
>
> Any relation Dana?
>
> __
95 matches
Mail list logo
