On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
...
> It has everything to do with. It's hard to fight a two front war.
Seen that movie Pi, where the number 216 is like, all over the place?
Yeah...
:Den
--
Time heals griefs and quarrels, for we change and are no longer the
same persons.
"Countrywide had nothing to do with Healthcare. "
Oh yeah. The payoffs Countrywide paid to certain candidate (for example
Chris Dodd) showed exactly how corrupt these bastards where. More backlash
means less chance of passing.
"If Issa did his little dance moves in order to try to kill an unre
All the top secret amendments bringing the bill to over 2000 pages
changed the entire bill.
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>>
>> "You seemed to be claiming that the Health Insurance Reform bill was 100% a
>> Democ
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "You seemed to be claiming that the Health Insurance Reform bill was 100% a
> Democratic construct that blocked out Republican input and kowtowed to the
> extremities of the Democratic party. "
>
> I am claiming that since it's the truth.
W
"You seemed to be claiming that the Health Insurance Reform bill was 100% a
Democratic construct that blocked out Republican input and kowtowed to the
extremities of the Democratic party. "
I am claiming that since it's the truth.
"But it has nothing to do with Democrats working with Republican
"That's got to suck. Harry, Barbara and Nancy sacrifice all those idiot blue
dogs and they keep their jobs."
You never know. Those one sided compromises might include cushy new jobs in
favored lobbying firms and so on.
J
-
No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is i
Don't know.A couple who voted against it were re-elected. Don't
have time to research the positions of the other 22.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> How many Blue Dogs voted against Obamacare and lost the election?
>
>
> .
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
The most punished "group"...as in a political coalition. Percentage
wise, they lost 50% of their seats.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> No. Wasn't your point that they were the most punished?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> What about them? Do they h
How many Blue Dogs voted against Obamacare and lost the election?
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> 54 members of the Blue Dog caucus before election. 26 now.
>
> http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-dog-democrats/2010/11/03/blue-dogs-shaved-half
~~~
No. Wasn't your point that they were the most punished?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> What about them? Do they have anything to do with Blue Dogs?
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> What about the 680 State Leg. Seats?
What about them? Do they have anything to do with Blue Dogs?
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> What about the 680 State Leg. Seats?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfus
That's got to suck. Harry, Barbara and Nancy sacrifice all those idiot
blue dogs and they keep their jobs.
Got to love that party.
At any cost.
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> 54 members of the Blue Dog caucus before election. 26 now.
>
> http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-do
What about the 680 State Leg. Seats?
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> 54 members of the Blue Dog caucus before election. 26 now.
>
> http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-dog-democrats/2010/11/03/blue-dogs-shaved-half
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> How man
54 members of the Blue Dog caucus before election. 26 now.
http://nation.foxnews.com/blue-dog-democrats/2010/11/03/blue-dogs-shaved-half
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> How many Blue Dogs were there?
>
> Devastation: GOP Picks Up 680 State Leg. Seats
> http://hotlineoncall.nati
If that was truly the case, then they wouldn't have voted for the people
that blocked or voted no on almost every measure to change that.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:12 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Pun
How many Blue Dogs were there?
Devastation: GOP Picks Up 680 State Leg. Seats
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/11/devastation-gop.php
Must have been a lot.
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Which is pretty funny when you consider how many of the Blue
And deservedly so...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 2:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
Which is pretty funny when you consider how many of the Blue Dogs lost
their seats in the election Tuesday
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Which is pretty funny when you consider how many of the Blue Dogs lost
> their seats in the election Tuesday. They were by far the most
> punished group of congresscritters.
>
>
Those folks were never going to survive more than one election cy
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> As did many on the left. The progressive priorities were also what a
> majority of the people wanted. Instead the blue dogs shifted everything to
> kiss the insurance company's ass...as well as their rep
Which is pretty funny when you consider how many of the Blue Dogs lost
their seats in the election Tuesday. They were by far the most
punished group of congresscritters.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> As did many on the left. The progressive priorities were also what
Except for the fact that they weren't locked out...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
"Can you name one part of the health care insurance reform pro
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:58 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
I complained about plenty during the year of health care insurance
reform discussion. Like handing the process over to the
Try this one:
http://tinyurl.com/25hqm76
CF site:
http://www.republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Blogs.Detail&Blog_ID=d5bb2321-b98d-405f-ba84-97fab7963009&Month=4&Year=2010
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> You do realize that that incident has nothing t
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Yet nothing approaching that made it to a vote, let a lone passed."
>
> Who said it did?
>
> "And still you say there was no compromise, that it was a party-line
> shove down the throat of America. "
>
> Say what? There was plenty of compr
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
>
> http://www.rollcall.com/news/39713-1.html or
Is that the same Darrell Issa that will be the next chair of the the
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee?
Oppps.
.
~~
They made compromises with the Blue Dog Democrats, they couldn't even
get all of them on board.
.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Yet nothing approaching that made it to a vote, let a lone passed. And
> still you say there was no compromise, that it was a party-line sh
"Yet nothing approaching that made it to a vote, let a lone passed."
Who said it did?
"And still you say there was no compromise, that it was a party-line
shove down the throat of America. "
Say what? There was plenty of compromise. All on the Democrat side. The
Louisiana Purchase, the Corn
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Can you name one part of the health care insurance reform process where
> Republicans volunteered to compromise?"
>
> Hard to compromise when you are locked out of the meetings. It kind of
> sends the message that even if you offer anythin
"Can you name one part of the health care insurance reform process where
Republicans volunteered to compromise?"
Hard to compromise when you are locked out of the meetings. It kind of
sends the message that even if you offer anything, we won't accept it.
Oh, that was the message.
Now, I'll ask
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
> "They see the health care package as it passed as a sellout to the
> Republicans and the insurance industry. "
>
> Of course they will. Nothing but full blown socialization of medicine is
> acceptable. Anything less is a sellout to Republic
"There are those on the left who would disagree with you"
Of course they would. And that's not a bad thing. At some point in the
last 50 years, it seems that it has become taboo to disagree.
"They see the health care package as it passed as a sellout to the
Republicans and the insurance indu
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>>
>> Fair enough. I can't bring myself to read Little Green Footballs and
>> Redstate all the time either.
>
> I thought LGF flipped to the dark side.
>
They did flip to the slightly less insan
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> That's funny. Sounds just like Obama Care. Was it sickening when the
> Democrats were doing it? I don't remember seeing you complain about it
> then. Just sayin'.
Here's a question for you, Jerry:
Can you name one part of the health ca
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Fair enough. I can't bring myself to read Little Green Footballs and
> Redstate all the time either.
I thought LGF flipped to the dark side.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusio
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "I understand this line of thinking and it is exactly what I've seen on the
> left at places like DailyKos."
>
>
> I wouldn't know about the DailyKos. I can't get my daily dose of extreme
> liberalism delivered to my mailbox via cf-talk.
F
The ad bordered on racist. I think that is why hispanics went for Reid.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Reid won only because his opponent was so weak. That and it appears
>> Nevadans like having the worst economy.
>>
There are those on the left who would disagree with you. They see the
health care package as it passed as a sellout to the Republicans and
the insurance industry. They may (weakly) support it because they
feel it is better than nothing, but it certainly didn't please all the
base.
On Thu, Nov 4
"I understand this line of thinking and it is exactly what I've seen on the
left at places like DailyKos."
I wouldn't know about the DailyKos. I can't get my daily dose of extreme
liberalism delivered to my mailbox via cf-talk.
"It is straight up partisan, kowtow to the extreme of your party,
" So a dead Democrat beat a living Republican. Priceless."
That cuts both ways.
Some would say it's priceless since a Republican lost.
Some would say it's priceless since the idiots voted in a dead person.
J
-
Over the last 15 months, weve traveled to every corner of the United
States. Ive
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>
> Reid won only because his opponent was so weak. That and it appears
> Nevadans like having the worst economy.
>
>
Hispanics broke for Reid 3-1, apparently because of an ad Angle aired
bashing Reid for being too easy on illegal immigration. That's
The budget for war should be offense budget :-D
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Putting it at the top this time.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdmp0kEWTo
Sorry I said clicked.
> My point, which you persist in missing, is that those who were
> defeated or had very close races, were luckwarm in their support of
> healt
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>>
>> How about cutting 50% from Defence AKA War :-)
>
> Defense != War
True, but the last decade most of the "defense" budget has been spent
on "war", so they need to uncouple the spending an
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Sam wrote:
The line monster ruined your video.
Putting it at the top this time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdmp0kEWTo
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
> Such the niggler. You do that often when you don;t want to concede.
> Of the 61 that
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> How about cutting 50% from Defence AKA War :-)
> lol
>
Defense != War
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14302721
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>> Did you miss the word "few"
>
> Of all the Democrats listed that article, 50% won. So now 50% is few?
Such the niggler. You do that often when you don;t want to concede.
Of the 61 that lost, do you think 30 of them voted against Health Care
Bo
Yep...I think it was Russ Carnahan (not 100% on the name)...his wife served
his term and was beaten by Al Blout yesterday.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:22 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
So a
So a dead Democrat beat a living Republican. Priceless.
Didn't a dead guy beat John Ashcroft in 2000?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Did you miss the part where Pelosi and Reid were reelected?
>
> So?
>
> http://www.huffi
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>> http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/127261-few-democrats-survive-vote-in-favor-of-health-reform
>>
>> Did you miss the part where Pelosi and Reid were reelected?
>
> Did you mi
Regardless of trends...it's sad that people can't be bothered to get off
their lazy asses and vote...
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 4:41 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Who got punished? Re: Punitive Politic
You can thank the Roberts court for that...singing Rush "Big Money"
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Who got punished? Re: Punitive Politics
I don;t see that at all.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>
> Did you miss the part where Pelosi and Reid were reelected?
So?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/03/jenny-oropeza-wins-califo_n_778113.html
Jenny Oropeza died last month, but her political career lives on. The
deceased California Democr
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> This state must be filled with the biggest idiots.
>> Gillibrand's acceptable, but the other two...
>>
>
> Schumer is vocal, I'll give him that. You hear his comments more than
> Gillibrand.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>> http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/politics-elections/127261-few-democrats-survive-vote-in-favor-of-health-reform
>
> Did you miss the part where Pelosi and Reid were reelected?
Did you miss the word "few"
>>> Just wait. Even you don't want
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Sam wrote:
> This state must be filled with the biggest idiots.
> Gillibrand's acceptable, but the other two...
>
Schumer is vocal, I'll give him that. You hear his comments more than
Gillibrand. Cuomo was a really good attorney general for NY and has been
bring
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, G Money wrote:
>
> Whoa whoa whoa...you cannot compare vote turnout in a mid-term election,
> with the voter turnout during a presidential election. Mid term voter
> turnout will ALWAYS be lower, and usually MUCH lower.
>
> To get a better comparison of turnout "tr
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>> Doubtful most voters made any decisions based health care. The
>> economy and the rhetoric from the pundits perhaps, but the most vocal
>> supporters of the health care plan, like Pelosi, won easil
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "So who exactly did the Republicans punish?"
>
> Who said Republicans? It would be hard for anyone to win a race these days
> with the support of one party. You have to get the independents. You know,
> those independents who voted for th
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. -Neil wrote
it Geddy said it
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> it is just sad that so many people wouldn't bother to show up.
>
~|
Order the Adobe
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> One thing I found interesting about this election is that for all the
> foreknowledge that Democrats were going to get the smackdown in this
> election, for everything everyone said about how there needed to be
> bigger turn out to avoid a
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Define a failing state.
Bankrupt, higher than average unemployment.
> All of Dems voted for the health care plan, and some of the Repubs.
Voting yes were 219 Democrats and 0 Republicans.
Voting no were 34 Democrats and 178 Republicans.
There a
"My point wasn't that the Democratic Party didn't get punished, my point was
that moderate to conservative democrats got punished at a much higher rate
than progressives. That same punishment was visited on the Republican side
as well, though more so in the primary season than the general election
"So who exactly did the Republicans punish?"
Who said Republicans? It would be hard for anyone to win a race these days
with the support of one party. You have to get the independents. You know,
those independents who voted for the Democrats and Barack Obama in 2008.
"While she will no long
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "Who got punished?"
>
> The Democratic Party got punished for not listening to their constituents.
> This is very obvious when conservative Democrats who voted against Obama
> Care got trounced by no name challengers.
>
> Certain incumbent
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
>
> It's all about how many yard signs you have pinned up around town!
I remember hearing many dems got caught stealing yard signs again and
someone said you have to be a real idiot to think that influences
people. made me laugh.
> All I go
"My problem with a lot of the people who got elected this time around is
that they don't seem to have any real idea of how they would exercise
greater fiscal discipline and help control the size of government. If you
came to me with a plan that says, 'this is the cuts I'll pursue and the
related c
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Sam wrote:
> Weird.
>
> Democrats outspent the Republicans in the House
> and the Republicans outspent the Democrats in the Senate.
>
> What was your point?
> Money has the opposite effect?
> :)
>
It's all about how many yard signs you have pinned up around town
"Who got punished?"
The Democratic Party got punished for not listening to their constituents.
This is very obvious when conservative Democrats who voted against Obama
Care got trounced by no name challengers.
Certain incumbent Republicans got punished in the primaries for the same
reason.
The
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I did notice all the failing states retained their leaders.
Define a failing state.
> The Republicans did win the house, now have the most governors and
> gained several senate seats.
> Not sure why you would try to spin that as a democrat win.
>
Weird.
Democrats outspent the Republicans in the House
and the Republicans outspent the Democrats in the Senate.
What was your point?
Money has the opposite effect?
:)
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I don;t see that at all.
>
> What I saw was that _exceptionally huge
I did notice all the failing states retained their leaders.
The Republicans did win the house, now have the most governors and
gained several senate seats.
Not sure why you would try to spin that as a democrat win.
Those who lost are mainly the ones that voted for ObamaCare, except of
course for
Hard to say.I think the people out here got really tired of her ads,
so it might have been closer with less spending. The hypocrisy on the
illegal housekeeper issue hurt her a lot. But basically her overall
message killed her chances, as did Fiorina's. I'm a former C-level
exec at a technology
that was dumb money.
but, do you think the race would have been that close without that level of
spending?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Meg Whitman spent 160 million dollars, most of it her own money, and lost.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
Meg Whitman spent 160 million dollars, most of it her own money, and lost.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I don;t see that at all.
>
> What I saw was that _exceptionally huge_ money affected a lot of races. Not
> normal money, not even big money, but ridiculous money.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Angle lost because Reid got 11 percent of the Republican vote.
> O'Donnell lost, Fiorina lost. So why is the Tea Party crowing
> victory?
>
>
I HOPE that the Republicans were merely using the Tea Party idiots to help
them win an election, and w
I don;t see that at all.
What I saw was that _exceptionally huge_ money affected a lot of races. Not
normal money, not even big money, but ridiculous money.
Like tequila shots at the end of a night, money gave people like a 20% bump
they otherwise wouldn't have had.
In races that should not hav
So who exactly did the Republicans punish?
While she will no long be speaker, Nancy Pelosi won her seat again
with 80% of the vote. Harry Reid was re-elected. The Dems still hold
the Senate.
Those who lost their seats, for the most part, were moderates who were
willing to work across the aisle
You know, I was just thinking about who got punished in this election.
When I look over the results, both in the primaries and the general
election, I see a polarizing effect. A lot of Tea Party sort of folks
made primary challenges to more established Republicans, coming at
them from the right.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Either our leaders in Washington are going to find their courage and start
> tackling our structural deficits or heads are going to roll again in 2012.
> Voters want everything and they are not going to get it. Someone has to man
> up and mov
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:17 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Punitive Politics
Either our leaders in Washington are going to find their courage and start
tackling our structural deficits or heads are going to roll again in 2012.
Voters want everything and they are not
>_>
<_<
sowwies to hear that.
0_0
On 3 November 2010 13:36, Jeff Garza wrote:
>
> Oh... Don't worry... They are cutting from defense. I just got laid off
> from a major defense company yesterday. The pain is still here folks.
>
> Jeff
>
>
~~
t: Re: Punitive Politics
How about cutting 50% from Defence AKA War :-) lol
On 3 November 2010 13:17, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Why can't we cut 3% from Defense?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://w
Heck, if they really wanted to try, I bet any 5th grade class could help
them make smart cuts that are not hurtful.
The problem is "not in my backyard" (or not from my pocketbook).
Every politician has people that own them, and have money that they are
getting that they are not willing to give u
Doing that all at once would be rather damaging to the economy, if
nothing else. Could we cut taxes after that? Sure, but we'd have a big
ol spike in unemployment to deal with. Probably not the wisest course
right now.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> How about cutting 50% from
How about cutting 50% from Defence AKA War :-)
lol
On 3 November 2010 13:17, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> Why can't we cut 3% from Defense?
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Antho
Either our leaders in Washington are going to find their courage and start
tackling our structural deficits or heads are going to roll again in 2012.
Voters want everything and they are not going to get it. Someone has to man
up and move ahead with painful cuts across the board. Why can't we cut 1
I don't tend to trust anyway running for anything unless they can tell
me "how". If you don't know how, then tell me who is going to tell
you how. Which lobbying groups? Which pundits? Which economists?
Judah
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> I am truly less concerned ab
I am truly less concerned about "how" yet.
That is why I loved the "The Rent is Too Damn High" guy.
One simple message. So true. And so many ways to address it from any number
of political opinions, both conservative and liberal, smaller government and
bigger.
I am hoping (not very hopeFUL, but
I think that's very well put, Jerry. Though I would quibble slightly
with your characterization of the 2008 election as Democrats had
strong success in 2006, so part of 2008 was building on what they had
done the election before. But certainly a lot of 2008 was a reaction
against how bad things ha
> It's funny. This morning, I saw where some talking heads were already
> predicting what kind of gains the GOP could make in the next election.
>
> They still don't understand. This election was not about support for the
> GOP agenda. It was about the Democrat agenda, specifically, its refutat
90 matches
Mail list logo
