RE: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]

2002-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you! Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Lalonde Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 9:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748] Pierre-Alex, You might have an issue with that

Summarization [7:31766]

2002-01-13 Thread David j
Hello folks, I'm working in a EIGRP enviroment, and I have some questions for you: Has anyone tried to do a manual route sumarization per interface with more or less 200 interfaces in a 7500? I've tried but I'm having a few problems, the summary routes aren't advertised sufficiently fast to the

CCIE 350-001 passed [7:31767]

2002-01-13 Thread Gerd Thümmler
Hi, i have passed the test :-), and now i working for my lab-test on 04/19/2002 in bruessels. IMO is the test not so hard. I have learn the CISCO courses SNAM, BCRAN, BSCN, CIT, CVOICE and CATM. The book CCIE 350-001: Routing and Switching Prep Kit from Bear Wolf was helpful for the latest

RE: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]

2002-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found out that version 4.1(7) supports GRE http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v41/pixrn417.h tm#xtocid1224219 Unfortunately, the image is no longer on CC0 (too old). Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

GBIC ??? [7:31770]

2002-01-13 Thread kenairs
Hi Group , From the cisco cd , WS-X6816-GBIC 16-port fabric-enabled Gigabit Ethernet switching module. The module has integrated distributed forwarding and has dual serial connections to the switch fabric module. The module requires GBICs. GBICs

Re: GBIC ??? [7:31770]

2002-01-13 Thread Chuck Larrieu
there will probably be a ton of posts, but why not? I'm waiting for a download to complete. The 65xx series switches come of the shelf with a 32 gig backplane. If you anticipate needing a bigger backplane, you must purchase a switch fabric module ( SFM ) which then increases your backplane to

RE: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729]

2002-01-13 Thread Circusnuts
I was told the case would not close, due to the way Cisco has positioned the outlet forward of the motherboard. .02 Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Compresses Cisco IOS to fit onto a smaller fla [7:31729]

2002-01-13 Thread Hire, Ejay
It is an alternate method for performing code upgrades. You used to be able to order a single use card that would upgrade the code on a single router and then self-destruct. (Not Explode, just self-disable) -ejay. -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]

2002-01-13 Thread Router Man
I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two spokes and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad that this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this situation.

copyright config [7:31774]

2002-01-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: copyright config [7:31774]

2002-01-13 Thread Gerd Thuemmler
Hi, In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... Can you copyright a config? Has anyone ever heard of it? ..oh no, i hope there is no way for that =8-| Gerd Thuemmler Berlin, Germany Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31775t=31774

RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]

2002-01-13 Thread Jim Brown
I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the connection? Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward. Sort of like if I shout over a hill, Hey Routerman are you there, this is

OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread Chuck Larrieu
to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and girls are watching football instead of studying. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31777t=31777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

OT: Re: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread Brad Ellis
Chuck, I think you have officially lost it. BTW: What's your new email address? I was trying to email you the other day and it was getting returned. (did you filter me? i didnt think I was harassing you that bad) :) thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL

Re: Free Router Lab Untill Noon PST. [7:31714]

2002-01-13 Thread Richard Towle
Thanks! Your setup is very similar to the lab I've setup at home. It appears that your problematic 2502 has no IOS loaded. I did a Show Flash and didn't see anything there. ---Richard Ed Chuchaisri wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guys, I planned to turn it off

multiple radius server [7:31781]

2002-01-13 Thread Mohammed Saro
I want to send accounting packets to multiple radius servers simultaneously when i add them in sequence it sends to them in a failover order Mohamed Saro Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31781t=31781 -- FAQ, list

RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
Chuck, I wish! I'm configuring MPLS in the EDS lab today for a project that is due tomorrow. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777] to

Re: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]

2002-01-13 Thread John Neiberger
I think you're correct about that. What I don't get is why some of the routers flat out ignore the neighbor statement. Even if it's not absolutely necessary, why--in some cases-would they ignore it? I posted this on the TAC QA Forum. I'm hoping someone will have an answer there. John

Re: PPTP - Conduit - Protocol 47 [7:31748]

2002-01-13 Thread Darrell Newcomb
Usually you can easily convince TAC that they should provide you with an image which is no longer publicly listed, but which is the logical next step for you to minimize the amount of changes to your already stable device. However in the face of significant bugs such as PSIRTs or what not your

RE: GBIC ??? [7:31770]

2002-01-13 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Actually, both are fabric-enabled. In the main 65xx box you have the 32Gb/s backplane (BUS) and now you can also take advantage of the Switch Fabric to bump your capacity up to 256Gb/s. Regarding the different 16-port GBIC cards you have three options: 6416 - BUS-only (32Gb/s) - SUP handles

RE: Summarization [7:31766]

2002-01-13 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
I've done it with about 100 interfaces on 7513's and didn't see this problem. It may be a limitation of the code on the box, memory (as you indicated), or something else. Have you been able to rule-out as many something elses as possible? What does the network topology look like? Do you have

Can Cisco manuals from CIT class legally sold? [7:31788]

2002-01-13 Thread DL
Does anyone know if the manuals from the authorized CIT class can legally be sold? Please note, these are the original manuals (Lab manual and work books). Would this violate any rules of the CCNP agreement? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31788t=31788

RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread Ed Chuchaisri
Well, I admit I was watching football there and wasted my 3 precious hours on a brutal sport. The result, however, didn't come up to be what I wanted though... Oh well... Back to studying.. Ed A Big Red Gold Fan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31789t=31777

OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Football?? Not a chance. Cricket! JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 14/01/2002 08:39 am - Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: OT: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Sweeney
Whats football? the other half is the football nut. Me? I was down at the hardware store digging up some clips and screws for my new rack I bought yesterday :) MikeS www.packetattack.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31791t=31777

RE: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]

2002-01-13 Thread Stefan Dozier
John, I've been following your thread and think I found a possible answer to your question on why the neighbor statement gets ignored when entered on spoke routers! In the OSPF Desig Guide Section 1 under Adjacencies on Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) Networks the next to last statement in the

RE: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]

2002-01-13 Thread John Neiberger
That's it! Wow, very cool. That's really been bugging me. I posted it to the TAC Open QA Forum, so we'll see if they come up with the right answer! :-) Thanks for letting me know about that, I appreciate it. John On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Stefan Dozier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: John,

exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]

2002-01-13 Thread ko haag
I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the CCDP? Anyone know? Ko Haag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31795t=31795 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Can Cisco manuals from CIT class legally sold? [7:31788]

2002-01-13 Thread David L. Blair
It happens all the time. Check out Ebay. As long as they are the original copy that should not be a problem. -- Through Complexity there is Simplicity, Through Simplicity there is Complexity David L. Blair - CCNP, CCNA, MCSE, CBE, A+, 3Wizard DL wrote in

RE: copyright config [7:31774]

2002-01-13 Thread Steven A Ridder
I was listening to an NPR newscast on something to do with copywriting when I thought of it. Patents too. What if you claim to come up with a novel way of figuring out a routing problem within the IOS, I wonder if you could patent it? I've seen business-practices patented (priceline.com,

Re: RE: you bad boys and girls... [7:31777]

2002-01-13 Thread John Neiberger
And I'm sitting here working on a ccbootcamp lab. Since the Broncos aren't in the playoffs I just don't feel like watching. :-) On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Kaminski, Shawn G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Chuck, I wish! I'm configuring MPLS in the EDS lab today for a project that is due

Re: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]

2002-01-13 Thread Gaz
640-441 DCN to make you a CCDA (pre-requisite for CCDP) then, 640-025 CID Gaz ko haag wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have passed the CCNP and was wondering what exam are needed to get the CCDP? Anyone know? Ko Haag Message Posted at:

RE: Practice Labs [7:31721]

2002-01-13 Thread Rukmal Fernando
The Lab that is designed for Time Zones Rack start times 1-15th of each month 7 am EST 16-31st of each month 7 am GMT 1st and 15th of each month the 7pm-7am will not be available for the other time zone due to time zone change. We will accormodate next day rack rentals on different time zones

Re: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]

2002-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have always used floating statics to back up a frame relay network. Why? Easy - we're only just migrating to IOS 12.1. And anyway, this particular network has been using floating static routes for the last several years (since *long* before dialer watch was available) - they are flexible, suit

EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]

2002-01-13 Thread s vermill
Sorry to bring this up again but apparently, for at least some of us, it needs to be. I chimed in the other day and offered a way to get EIGRP to distribute a default route. That basically amounted to simply defining a static to 0.0.0.0 and redistributing static into EIGRP (whoever corrected me

router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread LaRoy Slaughter
I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot figure out why the router cannot ping the work station, but the workstation can ping and telnet to the router Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31800t=31800

Help with access server [7:31801]

2002-01-13 Thread Stephane Wantou Siantou
Hi everybody, I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access my 3 routers RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have to use the console cable to access each router. But it doesn't w work. I am using an octal cable. 3 cables from the octal cable are connected to RouterA,

RE: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]

2002-01-13 Thread Juan Blanco
Ko, You need to take the CCDA and then the CID...take it in that order it will help... Good luck. JB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ko haag Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: exams needed for the

Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread Craig Columbus
I think we need more info. In the meantime, here's a possibility: When pinging from the workstation to the router, you're hitting a locally attached interface on the router (one on the same subnet). When pinging from the router to the workstation, the ping is originating from an interface

Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread Zeke Gibson
Are you running some type of software firewall on the workstation? What does the ARP cache on the router look like? -Zeke On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, LaRoy Slaughter wrote: I know this is a RTFM type question but for the life of me I cannot figure out why the router cannot ping the work

RE: Help with access server [7:31801]

2002-01-13 Thread s vermill
Stephane, I would start by adding 'modem inout' on lines 1 - 8. As for the octal cable, that may be a problem too. You might need a rollover in the mix? Not sure off hand. Regards, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31805t=31801

Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread LaRoy Slaughter
the sh arp comes back with the mac and ip of the workstation Zeke Gibson wrote: Are you running some type of software firewall on the workstation? What does the ARP cache on the router look like? -Zeke On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, LaRoy Slaughter wrote: I know this is a RTFM type

Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread LaRoy Slaughter
when I do a sh arp I can see a layer 2 connection The router sees the host both as a MaC and by IP. when I do a sh ip route it identifies the path to the host Craig Columbus wrote: I think we need more info. In the meantime, here's a possibility: When pinging from the workstation to the

Re: exams needed for the CCDP [7:31795]

2002-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While both these exams are required for the CCDP, and it is usually sensible to do them in the order given by Gaz, you do not need to have done the DCN before sitting the CID. You can do them in either order. But you won't be a CCDP until you do both. JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny

RE: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]

2002-01-13 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
I agree with Jenny's comments. I've also used floating-statics for quite some time to backup frame links. I was playing around with dialer watch in the lab this weekend and it does some 'interesting' things... For one, it seems to do away with the interesting traffic requirement. If the main

Re: Help with access server [7:31801]

2002-01-13 Thread Router Man
When you say that it doesn't work, what exactly are the symptoms? Stephane Wantou Siantou wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi everybody, I am trying to configure a Cisco 2509 access server to access my 3 routers RouterA, RouterB,and RouterC so that I don't have

Re: router cannot see host [7:31800]

2002-01-13 Thread Router Man
enable debug ip packet detail on the router to see if the router is even making an attempt to send the packet out. Also, Do you have more than one NIC on your workstation? LaRoy Slaughter wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I know this is a RTFM type question but for

RE: Help with access server [7:31801]

2002-01-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
Config look ok. Your octal cable has RJ-45 ends? Is each end numbered? Is end #1 going to the console port of RouterA, end#2 going to RouterB, etc? Do a show sessions. If you are not connected to any router you should get: 2509#sh sess % No connections open If you do have open sessions then

RE: ISDN dialer watch VS floating static routes [7:31609]

2002-01-13 Thread Charlie Wehner
Thanks for the advice Benjamin and Jenny. It sounds like you have to be careful when implementing dialer watch. (Especially, if you only want to bring up the link for 'interesting traffic'. I guess since 'dialer watch' is fairly new most people have 'floating static routes' in place. Message

Re: EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]

2002-01-13 Thread Chuck Larrieu
without knowing your configs, I can't say for sure, but in fooling with this a bit after reading this post, I believe you may have run into a classful issue on the default-network. in a simple linear setup R5R1-R3 observe the R3 routing table: * 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets

Quick Eagle Products [7:31815]

2002-01-13 Thread Andras Bellak
I'm looking for anyone with experience with Quick Eagle or Digital Isle DL5400 MUX products. If anyone has anything good or bad to say, or information on using their Fast Forward feature, please contact me off-list. Thanks, Andras Message Posted at:

VLAN info [7:31816]

2002-01-13 Thread NKP
Hi All , I was just working around on my Cisco Catalyst 2512XL switch , I was going thru the VLAN commands , I wanted to know the difference between creating the VLAN thru these two commands : Switch(config)#int vlan4 Switch(config-subif)#management Switch(config-subif)#^Z the second way

OT: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Chuck Larrieu
OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be going public Real Soon Now. Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command show ip prot enter. r2#sh ip prot %

Re: VLAN info [7:31816]

2002-01-13 Thread John Neiberger
There's a huge difference between the two. In fact, they are unrelated. Every switch has its own IP address for management purposes, which obviously must reside in some VLAN. By default, the management VLAN is VLAN1. In your first example, you made VLAN4 the management VLAN, which is why

RE: Help with access server [7:31801]

2002-01-13 Thread Stephane Wantou Siantou
Yes, my octal cable has RJG-45 ens, with each end numbered. I connected end #1 to RouterA, end #2 to RouterB and so forth. When I do sh sessions on the access server, I get No connections open. When I try to connect to any of the routers through the access server, it says, Trying

Re: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;-gt; [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread John Neiberger
Chuck, If it helps, I have read about that command at one point. It seems to me that it has something to do with NBAR or CBAC. ;- ) At least it has something to do with some technology that is a four letter acronym. heh heh... John Get

Re: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Murtaza Syed
Hopefully the following is of some help: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _r/qrfcmd3.htm#xtocid1 Quality of Service Commands ip nbar protocol-discovery QR-62 Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Command Reference ip nbar protocol-discovery To

Re: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Murtaza Syed
Hopefully the following is of some help: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _r/qrfcmd3.htm#xtocid1 Quality of Service Commands ip nbar protocol-discovery QR-62 Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Command Reference ip nbar protocol-discovery To

Re: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Tony Medeiros
My router has that command too. Can't get to show any output or find anything to turn it on with..And no reference to it all, even in 12.2. Must be one of the features that never made it Tony - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 8:39

Re: EIGRP 'default network' Rehash [7:31799]

2002-01-13 Thread Murtaza Syed
Following is some info from Cisco's site: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp8.html Default Routing There are two ways to inject a default route into EIGRP: redistribute a static route or summarize to 0.0.0.0/0. Use the first method when you want to draw all traffic to unknown

Re: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Ken Diliberto
You could always call TAC. Maybe they can find out for you. Either that, or tell you I don't know. :-) Ken Tony Medeiros 01/13/02 11:44PM My router has that command too. Can't get to show any output or find anything to turn it on with..And no reference to it all, even in 12.2.

Re: OT: Gawd I hate my life ;- [7:31817]

2002-01-13 Thread Chewy Gravy
At 11:39 PM 1/13/2002 -0500, you wrote: sigh. have not run into this before, not in two trips through the lab, not on any number of routers and IOS versions, both at home and in customer installations. Anyone got any clue what show IP protocol-discovery does? Google has a cached

Re: Hike In CCNP Exam Fee ????? [7:31827]

2002-01-13 Thread Mr piyush shah
Hello Guys, I am preparing for Cisco Exams I heard that the exam Fees for Cisco CCNP exam is going to rise. Can I know whether w.e.f when isit going to rise and how much ? Currently it is Rs. 7000/- Approx. Since I am from India ,I would like to know whether will it be applicable in India ?

Re: Static route load balancing? [7:31715]

2002-01-13 Thread Cisco Breaker
So you are actually saying that some packets will be lost. Can we avoid this with policy-maps or something else? Best regards, Chuck Larrieu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... doesn't matter. Serial1/0 100.100.100.1 YES manual up up