Spare us the mystery and tell us what you're getting at. :-) Did you forget
to tell the DHCP server to provide the correct default gateway address to
the PCs? That's my guess, since you say everything else like helper
addresses, etc. is configured correctly. Just a late-night theory, waiting
for
Ian,
I'm getting stuck trying to shortcut and not use a RADIUS server. :-|
My configuration looks a lot like yours. I guess I shouldn't try to
shortcut.
Thanks.
Ken
>>> Ian Henderson 09/27/02 09:12PM >>>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Ken Diliberto wrote:
> Has anyone configured VPN services on a 3
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Ken Diliberto wrote:
> Has anyone configured VPN services on a 3600 to accept connections from
> a Windows box? I've been experimenting with it and am ready to look for
> a hammer. :-)
I do it on 2600's and it works a treat :)
Where are you getting stuck? A few things I g
Thanks guys, this answers my question. Chuck I heard you are writing an
article on CertZone about 3550. Is that correct if so I look forward to
reading it. it's very timely.
""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> --
>
> www.chuckslongroad.info
> lik
I don't have the config you want, but how about a link for configuration
help?
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_62/config/over
vw.htm
""NetEng"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was trying to get FTP to work through my PIX and total
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""JohnZ"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone correct if I am wrong here
> 191.72.1.0
x.x.0001.0
> 191.72.2.0
x.x.0010.0
> 191.72.4.0
x.x.0100.0
> 191.72.12.0
x.x.1100.
Short answer: Yes you are correct.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
JohnZ
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuperNetting [7:54403]
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
19
The configuration you posted will result in a network that looks like the
information below.
SubnetMask Subnet Size Host Range
Broadcast
191.72.0.0 255.255.224.0 8190 191.72.0.1 to
191.72.31.254 191.72.31.255
""JohnZ"" wrote i
Can someone correct if I am wrong here
191.72.1.0
191.72.2.0
191.72.4.0
191.72.12.0
191.72.21.0
Am I correct in supernetting this to 191.72.0.0 /19
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54403&t=54403
--
FAQ, list arch
The AVVID solution I sold a few months ago is gong through implementation.
This project has been problematic for a lot of reasons, so it is not unusual
for a round of e-mails from the customer complaining about one thing or
another.
Today was a good one, however. Shows to go you have to ask thing
You can take a Cisco IP phone and connect it into a router? Well OK, I
didn't consider an ethernet crossover cable, which I suppose should work.
You aren't saying you could plug an IP phone into an FXS or FXO port, are
you?
one other comment below:
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
I wasn't aware it was in the recommended reading list. I didnt give Cisco
permission for that! :) (however, if it is there, i DONT have a problem
with it, that's for sure!)
we have not indicated this on the website, but, we have a 28 page PDF file
that we send out to folks who purchase the boo
For those who have used NLI's CCIE R&S Written Combo (Book/Test 3), how
would you rate it?
I also noticed Cisco recommends it in their reading list.
Any comments are appreciated.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54400&t=54400
---
>From what I saw when I looked at them, both are for the pre-august'02
version of the exam (as are almost all the books out there). The new test
appears to be very different; and much harder.
I started my reading with Caslow, Doyle and Habibi. Then I went on to a
couple of MPLS books and now I'm
Inline...
""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> One of my coworkers was telling me about a project he is working on. We
are
> positioning a gigabit service, which in this neck of the woods is a point
to
> point technology.
>
> The customer has a gi
Hi Alex,
Sorry for delay in responding, I am not sure why there isnt it document
or fn do not have such info. I gave quick spin on 2500 series of router &
following is the output...
thanks,
rahul.
lab#
lab#
lab#
lab#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (
Has anyone configured VPN services on a 3600 to accept connections from
a Windows box? I've been experimenting with it and am ready to look for
a hammer. :-)
Ken the Hammer-less.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54395&t=54395
-
At 9:14 PM + 9/27/02, Tim Metz wrote:
>We use an Excel spreadsheet that counts up the minutes and displays your
>uptime as a percentage. Is that the kind of thing you are looking for? It's
>very management friendly ;-)
>
>""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECT
Thanks, I was just trying to clarify. It seemed like there was a lot of
confusion, especially on my side!
John
>>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 9/27/02 12:30:21 PM
>>>
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I
> thought it
> was at one time but later I t
I'd preface it with it depends on the traffic going across the VLAN's. I've
seen 3600's get killed (actually die) with NFS traffic crossing an ethernet
port via inter-vlan traffic. A 1750 can only handle so much pps.
""Chris Headings"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I'd recommend getting off your butt and doing a little work :)
""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My boss has asked me to provide a monthly WAN reports regarding the
> UpTime/Downtime, Data Throughput etc. Does someone has a template in
> regards of w
I was trying to get FTP to work through my PIX and totally screwed things
up. My PIX no longer passes the DNS info (from my ISP) to my clients and NAT
is not working the way it should. I've looked all over cisco for the
solution but no dice. Can someone please email me the original config for a
PI
Yes we have settled the question. Most PBX's will probably use analog E&M
if small, or Digital PRI/QSIG if larger.
You can run an IP phone off of a router with ITS or SRST, but I probably
shouldn't be telling you that without the caveat that you need a license for
either service. Contact your l
When you combine the switches via gigastack, you are usually doing it
because you can't afford a chassis based switch in the closet (or don't need
one). If you do gigastack the switches, they are treated as separate hops
in spanning tree. I guess it's cheaper to run small gigastack cables then
i
You can use dialer-load threshold for incoming traffic as well.
""Christopher Dumais"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all,
> I have an ISDN line set up for vendor support. It is dedicated to one
> vendor. They are always the one to initiate the call, their
I have 5 subnets:
172.29.10.x/24 in the U.S.
192.168.100.x/24 in the U.S.
I would like to eliminate the 192.x.x.x subnet as it is mostly redundant,
machines multihomed.
172.29.20.x/24 in Mexico
172.29.30.x/24 in Europe
172.29.40.x/24 in Mexico
Europe office has a 1720 router and E1 connection.
Thanks ALL...worked great.
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54385&t=54324
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
I used to deploy small portable satcom packages for a living. One of the
things I was routinely asked to do was to provide local Tampa dial tone to
my customers no matter where in the world they traveled. So we would
connect a device known as a Multi-Rate Voice Card (essentially just a codec
wit
so far as I know, this will not work. Cisco's IP phones are ethernet
devices, and must connect to a switch port. Well, you could use a hub if
you're looking for trouble. ;->
IP phones are more akin to PC's, servers, etc, and you can't plug a PC into
either an FXO or FXS port either. at least not
Checking to see if my post is being filtered due to content or if there is
some other problem...
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
>
> Someone smarter than I made the following statements about FXO
> / FXS, in
> order to help me understand real world connectivity.
>
> That person said to think of FXO /
So, Chuck, was the wrong bandwidth statement problem ?
Sasa Milic wrote:
>
> You have specified bandwidth 64000, shouldn't it be just 64 ?
> With 64000, router thinks that there is enough bandwidth available,
> and policy-map doesn't do anything, but drops occur later, at
> interface level buff
Try this: When you telnet/console in, type "terminal length 0" at the
command line before doing a "show running-configuration"
-Original Message-
From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Show running-config all
I make up numbers based on the amount of calls that I can attribute to WAN
problems, place them in a presentation with lots of acronyms and long
technical words and e-mail them to my boss. Then, if the boss has any
questions about the technical jargon, I look up the answer on the Bastard
Operator
I'm wondering about buying a couple of Cisco Phones 7960 and a FXS card for
2600 and play with it. Will I be able to have a good voice lab only with
that? Maybe a FXO card and connect it in a regular phone line, is it
possible?
- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent
"terminal length 0" should help you:
mycisco1#terminal length ?
Number of lines on screen (0 for no pausing)
cya
Daniel Lafraia
www.lafraia.com
> A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running configuration
all
> at once, not page-at-a-time ("-more-"). I have no idea, but any h
Depends on what method you used to connect to the router.
If your consoled in do this under the Console interface as such:
Line con 0
Length 0
Repeat for vty 0 4 for telnet.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27
so that's what that does, and that explains why cisco works is always using
it.
Tim
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Use "terminal length 0" from priveleged mode to turn off the more
> prompt.
>
> HTH,
> John
>
> >>> "Don Claybrook" 9/27/02 2:2
We use an Excel spreadsheet that counts up the minutes and displays your
uptime as a percentage. Is that the kind of thing you are looking for? It's
very management friendly ;-)
""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> My boss has asked me to provide a month
This doc includes the pinouts...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jaber, Abdelatif
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cable for lab [7:54324]
I think 1 2 for RX and 4 5 for TX.
-Original Messa
Use "terminal length 0" from priveleged mode to turn off the more
prompt.
HTH,
John
>>> "Don Claybrook" 9/27/02 2:29:31 PM
>>>
Hello.
A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running
configuration all
at once, not page-at-a-time ("-more-"). I have no idea, but any
hints,
clues, or o
If you need to generate traffic which is a little more behaved I'd suggest
using one of the ttcp packages. That way you can get better stats on the
traffic and more easily increase number of simultaneous tcp
sessions ->traffic volume. Many versions support sending UDP as well if you
don't want w
I'd just use MRTG, and cut and paste the files into a Power Point slide or
2. Plus some numbers with the pictures. That should suffice for both of
you.
""Moises Luy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sorry, I don't have a report. Just in case, you might want to
Hello.
A customer asked me if I knew of a way to show the running configuration all
at once, not page-at-a-time ("-more-"). I have no idea, but any hints,
clues, or outright answers would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54367&t=54367
--
For those who have used NLI's CCIE R&S Written Combo (Book/Test 3), how
would you rate it?
I also noticed Cisco recommends it in their reading list.
Any comments are appreciated.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54366&t=54366
---
Sorry, I don't have a report. Just in case, you might want to include SNMP
information like traps and MIB poll stats.
Can you send out a template of the final WAN report?
-Moises
-Original Message-
From: Azhar Teza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 9/27/20
>Expect is really awesome to do some stuff fast and don't worry about
>Perl telnet modules, sockets and stuff. I have a lab with 5 routers
>and I was sick of cleaning the configuration every time I started a new
>lab test, so I wrote a simple expect script (attached to this msg) to load
>a default
My boss has asked me to provide a monthly WAN reports regarding the
UpTime/Downtime, Data Throughput etc. Does someone has a template in
regards of what other fields can be included in the report? He would like
to have a professional report. Thanks, Teza
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
> >
> > So, the FXS or FXO port on the router is labeled from the
> > perspective of
> > the device that connects to it?
>
> NO. It's labelled as what it IS.
>
> In other words, a station
> > connects to
> > an FXS port? And a PBX conne
""Christopher Dumais"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all,
> I have an ISDN line set up for vendor support. It is dedicated to one
> vendor. They are always the one to initiate the call, their system does
not
> allow incoming calls. They are telling me that
If I take 4 Catalyst 3500 Series Switches and configure in a GigabitStack
Module then I would assume that I am creating a one virtual switch and all
the backplanes of the switches should combine the total speed of switching
backplane. Am I correct or it is a samething you are connecting two swich
Stupid me I did have it(redhat 6.2), I just didn't see the option for it in
the man pages. duh.
Thanks
""sam sneed"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know where I can get a copy of this or something similiar for
> Linux. I found a windoze version but
So, the FXS or FXO port on the router is labeled from the perspective of
the device that connects to it? In other words, a station connects to
an FXS port? And a PBX connects to an FXO port?
This would be the opposite perspective from what they use when
labelling their cabling, which is always
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> So, the FXS or FXO port on the router is labeled from the
> perspective of
> the device that connects to it?
NO. It's labelled as what it IS.
In other words, a station
> connects to
> an FXS port? And a PBX connects to an FXO port?
NO.
>
> This would be the oppos
Hello all,
I have an ISDN line set up for vendor support. It is dedicated to one
vendor. They are always the one to initiate the call, their system does not
allow incoming calls. They are telling me that I have to set the thresholds
on my router(Cisco 2620). I have never heard of the receiving sid
Expect is really awesome to do some stuff fast and don't worry about
Perl telnet modules, sockets and stuff. I have a lab with 5 routers
and I was sick of cleaning the configuration every time I started a new
lab test, so I wrote a simple expect script (attached to this msg) to load
a default conf
Bruce Enders wrote:
>
> The simplest way I know of to explain these is to take the last
> letter
> (O or S) and associate that to where it will connect TO. So, an
> FXO
> connects to an Office (PBX or CO) and an FXS connects to a
> Station device
> (Telephone, Fax, or answering machine).
The pro
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I
> thought it
> was at one time but later I thought I had it backwards. Now I
> think I'm
> just really confused! Let me see if I have this right:
>
> A phone, as an end-user device, is a station and hence an
The simplest way I know of to explain these is to take the last letter
(O or S) and associate that to where it will connect TO. So, an FXO
connects to an Office (PBX or CO) and an FXS connects to a Station device
(Telephone, Fax, or answering machine).
As Chuck suggests, if you are connecting from
Isn't this the reverse of what Chuck posted? This is how I thought it
was at one time but later I thought I had it backwards. Now I think I'm
just really confused! Let me see if I have this right:
A phone, as an end-user device, is a station and hence an FXS device.
This connects to an FXO po
Sasa Milic wrote:
>
> You can also connect DTE to DTE, as well as DCE to DCE, via
> null-modem
> cable. So, analogy with FXO/FSO is not correct.
I can connect two telephones together too, with a telephone line simulator.
Also, to connect two routers back-to-back, you have to configure one to b
Haakon Claassen (hclaasse) wrote:
>
> FXS is a station (end device)
FXS connects an end device, such as a telephone. It isn't an end device
itself.
Priscilla
> FXO is a trunk line
>
>
>
>
> Haakon Claassen
> EMEA - IT Transport Services -WAN
>
This is man ping under OBSD 3.2 -stable, i386 arch
+++
-f Flood ping. Outputs packets as fast as they come back or one
hundred times per second, whichever is more. For every
ECHO_REQUEST sent a period ``.'' is printed,
I am getting an MCP COMM: F on this SUP III. Does anyone have any
suggestions. I tried searching Cisco's site but no luck.
Thanks, Jeff
Console> (enable) show ver
WS-C5000 Software, Version McpSW: 6.3(3) NmpSW: 6.3(3)
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 by Cisco Systems
NMP S/W compiled on Oct 30 2001, 1
FXS is a station (end device)
FXO is a trunk line
Haakon Claassen
EMEA - IT Transport Services -WAN
Cisco Systems
De Kleetlaan 6b - Pegasus Park
B-1831 Diegem (Belgium)
-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road
Which linux are you using and have you tried the ping -f
command. Under RH 7.3 the -f option doesnt show as available
under help for ping but the option is still available. The -f
option is still documented in the info files.
--
--Rick
Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to co
I've written some Perl scripts (on a LINUX box) to drive some router
tests. Perl is something I've taught myself, and don't have the
experience with it I do with C.
I got some vague advice from one of our people to write TCL/Expect
and plug that in -- another language to learn -- or to use a t
Chuck,
check out the voice over ip, frame and atm press book..its covered in
there..
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
>I did some quick looks into a couple of books I have to see what they say.
>
>Scott Keagy's book "Integrating Voice and Data Networks" has nothing to say
>about FXO and FXS in particu
nettable_walker wrote:
>
> 9/26/2002 11:11pm Thursday
>
> Professionals - I have two WIN95 laptops --- one is connected
> to a Catalyst
> 3920, then token ring 0/0, the other to a Catalyst 1924, then
> ethernet 0/0
I'm wondering why on the router you have e0/0 being 12.3.1.1/24 and to0/0
be
You can also connect DTE to DTE, as well as DCE to DCE, via null-modem
cable. So, analogy with FXO/FSO is not correct.
Sasa
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
>
> Someone smarter than I made the following statements about FXO / FXS, in
> order to help me understand real world connectivity.
>
> That pers
Sam,
Typically the ping program included with Linux has the -f option, but
you cannot use it if you are not root.
It's included in debian and redhat, not sure about other distros.
I don't have root access on any Sun boxes, so I can't tell if the option
is there or not. You could always compile
In Ciscoland FXS provides line voltage, ring etc.,
where as FXO is leading you out to the PSTN or to a PBX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jennifer Mellone
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: FX
No, OAM does not have a corresponding mechanism in frame relay and
does not help in internetworking as far a interface up/down status. OAM
is for ATM to ATM though there is, in FRF8 a spec for this functionality
in internetworking though it is not always implemented:(
Dave
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Yes, I think that's a great way to explain it. It helps with the telephony
example as well as helps newbies learning DTE/DCE. There's a discussion
about DTE/DCE going on right now in the Associates group. I was thinking
about using a telephone example to try to help.
I learned voice from Randy Fi
At least in the past it could be cost effective for a telephone customer to
have a telephone with a number from a remote location. Usually because they
made many numbers to phones located near that remote location. Such calls
were considered local calls. So the savings in long distance charges wer
I did some quick looks into a couple of books I have to see what they say.
Scott Keagy's book "Integrating Voice and Data Networks" has nothing to say
about FXO and FXS in particular.
The "Cisco Call Manager Fundamentals" book makes the rather brief assertion
that "FXS ports provide connection t
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of this or something similiar for
Linux. I found a windoze version but I need linux or UNIX.
My ping versions of linux and SunOS do not have the -f option. The only
version of pingflood I found on google is crap, the source code reads:
void main(){
This has always been confusing to me. I think that the phone would be
considered a station and should be an FXS device, while the upstream
connection (thinking of Central OFFICE here) should be an FXO. :-) But
that would be backwards from how it really is. I think. If I were to
install Cisco
That sounds great and makes more sense now! I always like reading your posts
:-)
I always confuse which device plugs into which port. I remember it like this:
Plug phone or "Station" into FXS (where Station=S)
Plug PBX/CO into FXO (where Office=0)
- Jennifer
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
Someone smarter than I made the following statements about FXO / FXS, in
order to help me understand real world connectivity.
That person said to think of FXO / FXS as something analogous to DTE / DCE.
That is, DTE connects to DCE ( and visa versa ) and that FXO connects to FXS
( and visa versa
Hi all
I've just configured a cisco 2600 with a G703 card in it. The configuration
went ok but i keep on getting an error message 00:44:48: ASSERTION FAILED:
file "../src-m860-c2600/c2600_pquicc_timers.c", line 1133 on the console
screen. Any ideas what this message is refering to or what problem
Hi all
I've just configured a cisco 2600 with a G703 card in it. The configuration
went ok but i keep on getting an error message 00:44:48: ASSERTION FAILED:
file "../src-m860-c2600/c2600_pquicc_timers.c", line 1133 on the console
screen. Any ideas what this message is refering to or what problem
Hi all
I've just configured a cisco 2600 with a G703 card in it. The configuration
went ok but i eep on getting an error message 00:44:48: ASSERTION FAILED:
file "../src-m860-c2600/c2600_pquicc_timers.c", line 1133 on the console
screen. Any ideas what this message is refering to or what problems
I think 1 2 for RX and 4 5 for TX.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 27, 2002 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cable for lab [7:54324]
Hello all...
Does anyone know what the pin outs are to allow me to connect, back to
back,
2 T1-
1&2 to 5&4 and vice versa.
Chris Headings wrote:
>
> Hello all...
>
> Does anyone know what the pin outs are to allow me to connect,
> back to back, 2 T1-WICs to simulate a connection between 2
> routers.
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
We use 1751's in a couple of environments and are easily using around 25-30
VLANS's...with no problems. The router gets some decent usage and
everything has worked fine for us...
HTH
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54325&t=54323
---
Hello all...
Does anyone know what the pin outs are to allow me to connect, back to back,
2 T1-WICs to simulate a connection between 2 routers.
Thanks
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54324&t=54324
--
FAQ, l
Hello!
I wonder if the Router cisco 1751 support 30 Vlan in a 802.1Q environment.
thnx in advance.
CCNP CQS
Cumprimentos
Antero Vasconcelos
Compta
Network Solutions
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. (+351) 22 969 9940
Fax (+351) 22 969 9935
www http://www.compta.pt
Message Pos
The entire chapter on OSPF in that book is dangerous. I would recommend
that you find another source to study OSPF or you may walk away with a very
unfortunate understanding of that particular routing protocol. Beware
especially of any discussion involving an ASBR.
Matthew Webster wrote:
>
> I
There is no bandwidth averaging mechanism in EIGRP. Does that help?
Abu Mwalie wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have two multiple choice questions, please:
>
> Q1. When multiple successors exist to a destination, how does
> DUAL determine the preferred path?
>
> A. Largest bandwidth between source
At 12:23 AM + 9/27/02, Matthew Webster wrote:
>I studying the CiscoPress CCNP Routing Book at the moment.
As I've always understood from the IETF:
E1 metric = sum of internal costs of reaching ASBR + external cost of ASBR
E2 metric = external cost of ASBR.
> There appears to
>be a contradi
""afshin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am installing a cisco based network with 3548s at access layer and 6506s
> at the collapsed core . I am using dual 6506s for redundant links from
3548s
> . I am using 4x1000BaseSx links between the two 6506s which are bu
""Magondo, Michael"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Russell
>
> Are you saying that CHAP is not capable of one way authentication?? And
> to do this one has to use PAP???
Almost, but not quite... CHAP can operate in 2 modes, if you use "ppp
authentication chap"
Enabling ATM OAM (Operations and Maintenance?) cells on the
hub-site router lets you see when the remote Frame Relay
PVC/DLCI goes down. Here's a sample:
interface ATM1/0.105 point-to-point
description ATM PVC to FrameRelaySite
mtu 1500
bandwidth 256
ip address 10.1.121.89 255.255.255.252
Russell
Are you saying that CHAP is not capable of one way authentication?? And
to do this one has to use PAP???
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Russell Heilling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2002 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: chap authentication LONG !!!
Ok I have tested this and got it to work with out the dual usernames on
bouth router, as I was talking about in the previous post
but that still leves my orginal question, and if any one can see anything
from the debug, that would be great.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/re
Your dialer map statements must have 'broadcast'
ie dialer map ip 1.1.1.3 broadcast 8358683
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54314&t=54276
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/lis
Ok thanx for the explanation
to get this 100% I just have one more question
If I am calling an ISP
Router 1
has in its config
dialer 0
ppp authentication chap calli
ppp chap hostname bla
ppp chap password bla1
and that works to authenticate to the ISP router, but as chap is two way, do
I als
At 12:23 AM + 9/27/02, Matthew Webster wrote:
>I studying the CiscoPress CCNP Routing Book at the moment.
As I've always understood from the IETF:
E1 metric = sum of internal costs of reaching ASBR + external cost of ASBR
E2 metric = external cost of ASBR.
> There appears to
>be a contradi
It depends on the flash chips, some older boot roms do not recognise the
newer chips.
Call cisco to get some upgraded roms if you have a contract or you can
get them cheap from ebay.
The version you are looking for is 11.0(10c)XB2.
hth,
Mark.
>-Original Message-
>From: Binh [mailto:[EM
Enabling ATM OAM (Operations and Maintenance?) cells on the
hub-site router lets you see when the remote Frame Relay
PVC/DLCI goes down. Here's a sample:
interface ATM1/0.105 point-to-point
description ATM PVC to FrameRelaySite
mtu 1500
bandwidth 256
ip address 10.1.121.89 255.255.255.252
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
