I have no doubt this is not the cetification!
I am just saying it is not testing you on your experties or knowledge!
-Original Message-
From: George Bethel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ccie is a rip off!
Hey, the ccie should stay hard - this is the point!
But product and memory question is not hard - just the opposite !
I
-Original Message-
From: Steve Dispensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCIE written [7:58400]
All,
First, thank you for all who replied! I appreciate the help.
To summarize public and private responses, let me first point out there are
likely several solutions to my problem. I am posting the one that I am most
familiar with.
nei Client_AS remote-as 18687
nei Client_AS version 4
nei
I think you cannot use as filter lists when using conditional advertisement
because conditional advertisement feature tracks routes in routing table to
decide which route-map it selects. And IP routing table does not contain any
as path information.
Ozan Akdemir
-Original Message-
From:
wexo la wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have no doubt this is not the cetification!
I am just saying it is not testing you on your experties or knowledge!
You are correct to say that the CCIE written exam, at least in the past, had
some serious problems. I,
Hey
I am configuring Cisco router 1750 with Radius
,wherein I am making windows 2000 to work as RADIUS
SERVER. I am trying to telnet the router with
authentication via RADIUS SERVER.What should be the
configuation of router for this ?Also what additional
configuration to be done on Windows 2000.
Priscilla Oppenheimer sagte:
I may be starting a new project doing some writing about technologies
used in enterprise networks. (read not service provider)
I know of someone, who could use it!
Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this?
We're using it here.
How about
Hello !
I have an issue regading Bgp:
As 1 i have 3 routers and router 1 is RR r2 has an EBGP peer and sees
a 100 network trough hes ebgp neigbor.
Anyway router1 sess that network trough Ospf and router 3, i am not allowed
to use #network an #no synch i bgp, the only way is redistribute ospf to
Hi all,
We have a 3550-12T and 3 WS-2950G-48-EI switches which are configured in
a cluster with the 3550 being the cluster command switch.
When viewing the cluster via the web browser the 2950 switches just show
up as unknown devices, how can I get the cluster to recongnise the other
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
p b wrote:
Actually using secondaries and DHCP should be a non issue with
any reasonable DHCP server platform. As you mention, in many
versions of IOS the interface's primary IP address is used
as the DHCP giaddr. If an interface has multiple secondaries,
Argh. Tab and return doesn't work well in when posting through
the web page
Let me revise the last part of my message:
If the interface (or sub-interface) looks like:
int ethernet 4/0.42
ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0 sec
ip address 10.0.3.1
The radius server is used to authenticate windows dial-up users using
broadband. I want the radius acct password to expire so that the user can
change it themselves without help from the administrator.
- Original Message -
From: Elijah Savage III
To: Tunde Kalejaiye ;
Sent: Tuesday,
What are the users vpn into it has to be a pix or 3030 or router, what
are you using to terminate the vpn connections since they are broadband.
Let me know and I will try to send you a config for that device to make
this possible.
-Original Message-
From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL
hi
iam also planning to take around june 08, plse join me i will help u
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58547t=57983
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Well, the first thing to do would be to look at the interface counters
and make sure they concur with MRTGs view of the traffic.
In my experience when one of our customer routers has a huge burst in
traffic it is usually due to either file sharing or a DoS attack of some
type. ACLs, netflow,
Well passed BCRAN tody, It was an ok test, not to hard, the only thing that
gave me any problems was, a lot of Modem / Access Server type question, as
that is somthing I have no hands on experience with.
Well onto to Routing next, then support.
Message Posted at:
n_guide_chapter09186a00800d9816.html
This would be helpfull. I found it by searching the key words configurring
access lists.
Geert Loonbeek wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello
I'm looking for a good and free of charge study guide on access lists/
static
Guys, a reminder: you cannot begin a post to the mail list with an URL.
Type a line of text first, then paste the URL. The filters are designed to
look for an URL at the top of the post, to filter out spam.
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Charlie
Sent: 12/04/02 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL
Does anybody know what happen to this site and magazine?
It appears that its no longer available. Has it been replace?
It had good technical articles.
www.ciscoworldmagazine.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58551t=58551
thing with ppp multilink is the following
Both end times ie, load-thres, dialer-timeouts have to be exactly the same.
Also, I found that u need ppp multilink on the dialers and bri ints and
ensure both sides are the same.
Maybe this will help.
-Original Message-
From: Leo Song
Thanks,
I understand now! Here it is:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_configuratio
n_guide_chapter09186a00800d9816.html
B.J. Wilson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Guys, a reminder: you cannot begin a post to the mail list with an
Congratulations! Good luck with ur next exam...
Cheers,
Kenan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58554t=58548
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
I have a quick question for the group. Normally I configure
PIX's by hand, manual, straight forward configs. I seem to
remember that it use to be a no-no to mix manual configuration
of a PIX with PDM configuration, something about PDM
getting confused, or the manual configuration getting hosed
congrats...study hard ...routing/support are the hardest ones.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58556t=58548
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
PDM gets messed up once in a while if command line changes are made. I
cannot remember specifics of the scenarios in which this happens, however
from the command line under config mode, clear pdm seems to keep things on
track. It resets the PDM configuration and the next time PDM is run, it
we are looking to migrate isdn backup at our retail stores to dsl...is there
anyone that has performed this already?
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon Wireless
949.286.6623 (o)
949.697.7964
Hi All,
I am wondering if the VLAN number is valid locally on a LAN only or it goes
across the WAN link? In my scenario, I have two LANs separated with 2 WAN
routers. On the LAN # 1, I assign a VLAN 100 with IP address (gateway) of
10.100.1.1. On LAN # 2, I assign another VLAN 100 but with an
I never heard about this type of config on cisco routers :
The only rules I known about cisco implementation of forwarding address are
shown on this web link :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09405a.shtml
If you find anyway to implement this kind of
They have changed their name to Enterprise Networking Magazine as of the
Dec issue. I haven't seen it yet.
Publisher is Publications Communications, Inc. aka PCI
I tried their site pcinews.com. There is no mention of the new publication.
-Original Message-
From: David Johnstad
Unless you're doing some kind of bridging or IRB, this won't be a problem.
Even then, I'm not sure it would necessarily be a problem. In a normal
topology, VLANs are locally significant.
Thomas N. wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering if the VLAN number is valid locally on a LAN
only or it
Folks, I just received my 6 mos. heads up for my CCNP. My CCNP expires in
May of 03 and my DP in June of 03. My second and hopefully last CCIE lab
date is on for 7/30 but can be pushed out into September.
Are there any re-certification books that specifically cover the recert.
exam? Or, is the
Thanks for all the info p b. It's very helpful.
Regarding the first situation, where the DHCP server is on another segment
and we're using a helper address to get the requests over to the server:
We have established that if you use secondaries, the router puts its primary
address into the giaddr
Not unless the routers were using trunking and it does not sound like
they are...
The L3 links to each lan switch dont know anything about the vlan .
Larry
Thomas N. wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering if the VLAN number is valid locally on a LAN only or it goes
across the WAN link? In my
nrf wrote:
wexo la wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have no doubt this is not the cetification!
I am just saying it is not testing you on your experties or
knowledge!
It used to be that you could pass the CCIE written with detailed
industry/technical
Mirza, Timur wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
we are looking to migrate isdn backup at our retail stores to dsl...is
there
anyone that has performed this already?
CL: having done a number of data networks that were DSL based ( but none
migrating ISDN to DSL ) I
A prep test I am using has a question for which I disagree with the answer.
Here is the questionÂ…
If I had a Class B address, what subnet mask would I use if I wanted to
split it into 8 class C addresses?
a.255.255.240.0
b.255.255.255.0
c.255.255.248.0
d.255.255.254.0
The answer from the
The answer is correct, with the assumption ip subnet-zero was
configured.
Leo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLSM Question [7:58569]
A prep test I am using has a question
Larry Letterman wrote:
Not unless the routers were using trunking and it does not
sound like
they are...
The L3 links to each lan switch dont know anything about the
vlan .
Larry
Larry,
Just curious... Can VLANs be bridged over a bridge group that includes
serial WAN connectivity or
In the words of the esteemed Maxwell Smart, missed it by that much.
Good test. Liked it a lot. Can't say much about the content, obviously.
The 3550's were there. I think that those who have expressed reservations
about this will find little to worry about. The Lab writers did a pretty
good job
Richard Burdette wrote:
A prep test I am using has a question for which I disagree with
the answer. Here is the questionÂ…
If I had a Class B address, what subnet mask would I use if I
wanted to split it into 8 class C addresses?
a.255.255.240.0
b.255.255.255.0
c.255.255.248.0
It sounds like DSL has a low mean time between failure (MTBF) but a high
mean time to repair (MTTR), which can be just as bad, especially if it's
your only backup. Of course, your mileage may vary (YMMV), depending on the
service provider. Also, a service level agreement (SLA) would help, as Chuck
I would think that you can bridge them with IRB/CRB but the vlan id
would not be
an issue since the connections are not using isl/dot1q trunking. You
would basically
be making a flat network across the wan links. The vlan information
will only propagate
across trunk links that pass the vlan
A benefit to DSL as backup is that you should immediately known when it
goes down. This allows you to have the telco begin repairs while your
primary circuit is functioning. With ISDN, if you don't use it very
often there may be a problem with the line and/or equipment and you'd
have no idea
One Cisco Press book says this about VTP pruning:
...This means that it restricts broadcasts, mulicasts, and flooded unicast
traffic from switches that do not have ports assigned to that VLAN...
Anyone one know what, if any, implications this has for OSPF adjacencies?
Specifically, I'm dealing
Priscilla,
Your exactly correct on sub-interfaces. We use a separate subnet for Voice
eq. and we configured our primary DHCP server that is on the first sub
interface to hand out those address's. The Router ( in our case a 4006 )
will substitute the sub-interface address.
You can actually do
Priscilla,
Your exactly correct on sub-interfaces. We use a separate subnet for Voice
eq. and we configured our primary DHCP server that is on the first sub
interface to hand out those address's. The Router ( in our case a 4006 )
will substitute the sub-interface address.
You can actually do
thx for the heads up...we are researching dsl as a backup solution...we have
1500 sites on isdn backup we have tons of isdn telco issues
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 12:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s vermill wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Richard Burdette wrote:
A prep test I am using has a question for which I disagree with
the answer. Here is the question.
If I had a Class B address, what subnet mask would I use if I
wanted to split it into 8
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote
I may be starting a new project doing some writing about
technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service
provider)
Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this?
Ah, ok. I think I see some of the confusion. Recall that one
can configure sub-interfaces with secondaries:
int ethernet 4/0.10
ip address 1.2.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 2.3.4.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip helper-address 99.88.77.66
int ethernet 4/0.20
ip address 3.4.5.1 255.255.255.0
nrf wrote in message..
ISIS has more tuning parameters and more extensibility than OSPF.
It also has significantly more scalability than OSPF. I dislike
EIGRP precisely because it's inner-workings are closed.
If Cisco opened up EIGRP and you understood it completely, would
you be more likely
was your problem split horizon?
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In the words of the esteemed Maxwell Smart, missed it by that much.
Good test. Liked it a lot. Can't say much about the content, obviously.
The 3550's were there. I
Chuck, You will pass next time. Judging by your posts over the last several
years your Cisco skillset has moved from information to knowledge to wisdom.
Many have followed your progress and will cheer your eventual success.
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
I say DSL has no multi-service (or very limited) capabilities. There
isn't much in terms of QoS, LFI or other voice/video tools. Plus there is
no QoS across the DSL network (if over Internet) and no standard nation-wide
(no National provider).
If you say, there is no voice going across network,
I'd focus on Avvid technologies, centraly managed security and storage
solutions across nation-wide networks and public Internet (Cisco Works/ACS),
and on-line collaboration tools using open standards like LDAP, X.509,
h.323/SIP, etc.
That is where Enterprises are moving.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
You are correct. I read it too quickly.
William Lijewski wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello,
The default for the maximum number of mac-addresses is one, and the
default
violation is shutdown.
Bill
Message Posted at:
Chuck,
Man you will get it next time, many people in this group follow your
advices, suggestions and idea because we
have confident on your expertise, Your failing prove one more time that
becoming a CCIE is not a game but serious
work from our part.the phrase below puts it very clear that
dre wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
nrf wrote in message..
ISIS has more tuning parameters and more extensibility than OSPF.
It also has significantly more scalability than OSPF. I dislike
EIGRP precisely because it's inner-workings are closed.
If Cisco
Chuck,
Man you will get it next time, many people in this group follow your
advices, suggestions and idea because we
have confident on your expertise, Your failing prove one more time that
becoming a CCIE is not a game but serious
work from our part.the phrase below puts it very clear that
That's exactly the way I felt after my attempt, minus the possible hardware
problems.
The problem I'm running into now is, my lab date is coming up (Jan 14th) and
it's very hard for me to get motivated to go through stuff I've gone through
before... but I know if I don't go over it it'll come
Is it necessary to be very knowledgeable about Windows 2000 and Exchange
before one begins to study for the Cisco Unity Exam?
Bruce
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58593t=58593
--
FAQ, list archives, and
I would second Chuck on this. I have seen some folk
with DSL backup when the backup didn't work. Always
was something with the provider. If you go this route,
make sure to test/use the DSL connection on a weekly
or bi-weekly basis. Same could be said for ISDN
though. I guess it all depends on how
The PDM doesn't support commands such as the 'alias' command; if your
config has an unsupported command (from the PDM point of view) in it,
when you load the PDM, it will only let you have access to the Monitor
Tab. Hopefully, they'll fix this in the next revision... but one can
only hope.
-Mark
the following is configuration of my cat6509:
--- --- --- ---
---
1 2WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE SAD053202VH Hw : 2.2
Fw : 6.1(3)
Fw1: 6.1(3)
Hi
Its possible and I am using it in my lab setup for ADSL connection.
Regards
Deepak
pauldongso wrote:
Hi,
Is it valid to configure virtual template as the NAT inside source?
Thanks
Paul
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58601t=58521
Hi all,
I am busy with my CCSP cert and this will be exam number 3 of 5.
Anyone else on the same track here and any pointers appreciated.
Thanks
Andrew
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58602t=58602
--
FAQ, list
I have just been having an argument about this with some colleagues. Nice to
know that I was right. I had to prove this to them on a working environment
before they would believe this.
Thanks!
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04
67 matches
Mail list logo
