OR , you don't have to change the IP , you can simply change the Vlan on
the port to work for the IP on the WKST. As long as you have DHCP up and
running and you have got vlans configured on your switch , you can move
a pc any where , put the port into the correct Vlan , and you will work.
I have
OR , if on a gigabit port , you could use the term show run int gigabit
0/1 this would show you the config for gigabit 0/1 only , so you don't
need to go through the entire config of a show run command :)
A show interface will show you the entire config like a show run , just
kind of in a
These have the usual 1500-2500 dollar cost?? I'd like to find a modestly
priced training solution.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: kris moby
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 8:46 PM
Subject: CCNP classes in San Diego! [7:60786]
Mira Costa College is offering CCNP classes
This does NOT match my previous experience. My experience has been that
IOS seems to use NAT (not overloaded) until all pool addresses are used
then start overloading the last one. I dont know what happens once all
when this address gets maxed out.
The only reason we noticed this was due to
sorry
we got a bit of topic...
all the access permissions are setup in ...
Server configuration , setup ,secuiry,modify/Delete Users
but even with the VERY basic permissions of helpdesk you should still be
able to ruin ciscoview...
i believe there is a permissions issue on the disk you have
Dwayne,
it's most likely that any NAT implementation would overwrite the header
data that it wishes to change, rather than rewrites the header in its
entirety. Of course the end result would look the same when you view
the packet, however you can recalculate the checksum from the old and
new IP
Hello!
And there are some issues with several protocols, as Marc points out. In
FTP, for example, possibly the new packet will be larger than original one.
(IP Addresses are codified in the data payload as text). So, it's possible
the router has to fragment the packet. And that's not a simple
I recommend routing before remote access.
From my experience, the remote access test seemed to be almost an extension
of the routing test - taking several topics and going further in depth on
them.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60805t=60736
hallo,
I have a q regarding switches.
Does any interf have a separate MAC address ?
Is there a diff betw managed / unmanaged switches
regarding mac addrsses and interfaces ?
thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
Spend a lot of time on MLS.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60806t=60785
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
Im about to start studying for the CCNP. I just wanted to know upfront are
there any config questions in the exams and what to expect. No doubt Ill
have alot of other questons along the way
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60808t=60808
I've passed the BSCN exam and I assure you there will be a lot of config
questions.
Good Luck!
Pete Nugent wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Im about to start studying for the CCNP. I just wanted to know upfront are
there any config questions in the exams and
hi,
it really depends on how you want to implemnet it ...
the cisco stuff comes as a physicall probe device...i.e either a PCI card
and stand-alone probe or a 6500 card...
wear-as realsecure can come as a agent/software app that you can put on
server`s ...
the plus and minus point
Cisco
We have several DSL sites that are composed of a PIX 501 and one or two IP
phones. Voice quality is acceptable but not great.
Scott
--- On Fri 01/10, Simer Mayo wrote:From: Simer Mayo [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:35:17
GMTSubject: VoIP from behind PIX
Steve
In fact I tried reinstalling Java Plug-in and that
solved my problems.Anyway thanks for help
Regards
--- steve wrote: sorry
we got a bit of topic...
all the access permissions are setup in ...
Server configuration , setup ,secuiry,modify/Delete
Users
but even with the VERY
I need to break up this address for muticast group assignment. 239.0.0.0/8
what would be the best way to break these up for different groups.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60813t=60813
--
FAQ,
Hi everyone,
My question is regarding ODR vs EIGRP. I have about 16 or 17 stub routers
that connect back to my core. Some of the remote locations are configured
via frame and are (or will) be running VOIP. Another group of remote (but
not quite as remote) locations are point-to-point, most with
Oooops I meant sim questions. Silly me of course there will config questions?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60815t=60808
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Are there any folks preparing for the CCIE lab, in Bangalore, INDIA???
Anybody interested in sharing/selling equipment, books,study
materialContact me off-line.
Cheers
Simon
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60790t=60790
I've found that it's useful to have a variety of kit, and as many
routers as possible. Cisco prices on eBay have fallen through the
floor. A 4000 series with NP-4Ts is a good frame switch. 2500 are good
workhorses, best to get one with an ISDN BRI (I didn't and regretted
it). Once you have a
Get over it!! If you like Cisco enough then do it!!! If you like
networking enough then do it! If you are after the quickest and
best solution for money, then leave!!! People here are to pose
and solve problems, plain and simple!
- Original
Brian wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
These have the usual 1500-2500 dollar cost?? I'd like to find a modestly
priced training solution.
Brian, are you a Cisco customer, or work for one? Are you able to get to the
Cisco training offerings at
Francisco Sedano/Inf-Pronet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello!
And there are some issues with several protocols, as Marc points out. In
FTP, for example, possibly the new packet will be larger than original
one.
(IP Addresses are codified in the data payload
Doug S wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't
point
you to any publicly available documentation on this, but cut and pasted
Peter Walker wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This does NOT match my previous experience. My experience has been that
IOS seems to use NAT (not overloaded) until all pool addresses are used
then start overloading the last one. I dont know what happens once all
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is
done via RSM or router on a stick.
-Original Message-
From: Tamhankar, Nitin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Subnet question [7:60711]
hmm, yea I do have a cco login, price for this though cheaper, is still
outta my reach for now, but I'll keep this in mind.
Bri
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: CCNP classes in San Diego! [7:60786]
Brian
2924Switchsh int fa0/6 switchport
Name: Fa0/6
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative mode: static access
Operational Mode: static access
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: isl
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: isl
Negotiation of Trunking: Disabled
Access Mode VLAN: 10 (VLAN0010)
Trunking Native
If I plan to be here in San Diego past the 15'th I'm definitely signing
up. Brian, have you taken any classes there before? If so, how'd you
feel about the environment?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Brian
Sent: Friday, January 10,
I wonder - is this a situation where specific code level, or the family of
products in question, etc., is causing a discrepancy?
I know the PIX (currently), for example, works as TLaWR states below ...
However, perhaps in IOS when you specify
ip nat pool overload (start) (finish)
Ignoring my earlier thread. I meant to ask if anyone can give me an idea as
to what simulation questions are in the CCNP exam.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60826t=60826
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
What sorts of performance issues are you noticing on the telephony side of
the house? You said it was acceptable so on a MOS scale, whats the voice
quality like? Thanks.
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
the test will ask config commands to be typed in..
exactly the way the book has it, no shortcuts...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
San Jose Transport
Cisco Systems Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:01 AM
Hi Listonians,
I have a Cisco 5500 in my lab rack. I wanted to know if anyone knows EXACTLY
what Supervisor Engine I need for the CCNP switching exam?
Do I need just a sup-III (WS-X5530-E1) or a (WS-X5530-E2)?
to quote a supplier I spoke with:
The minimum SUPIII for CCNP studies, and the older
Hello all,
I have a question. I have gre tunnels going through MPLS running 1.544mbps,
running EIGRP. The secondary links are Frame Relay links running at 256kbps
per link. Presently EIGRP has calculated the best link to be the Sprint
Link as there are bandwidth statements in the frame relay
I found the Cisco Interactive Mentor LAN Switching simulator as entirely
sufficient preparation for CCNP studies. It's far less expensive, and the
Cat5K is now completely irrelevant as far as the CCIE lab goes...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Hello all,
I have a question. I have gre tunnels going through MPLS running 1.544mbps,
running EIGRP. The secondary links are Frame Relay links running at 256kbps
per link. Presently EIGRP has calculated the best link to be the Sprint
Link as there are bandwidth statements in the frame relay
You have to put a bandwidth statement under the tunnel interfaces as well,
with a higher value than FR.
Aurelian Georgescu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: : Influencing EIGRP to
I would set up VLAN's keep in mind you need to route between VLAN's. This is
done via RSM or router on a stick.
Daniel Ladrach
CCNA, CCNP
WorldCom
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60836t=60711
--
FAQ, list
Put a port in VLAN2.
Rutger Blom wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello, I have a question about configuring a new VLAN. This is the
situation:
I would like to configure and activate a new management VLAN in a cisco
2950
switch. The switch to be configured is
Team
I need ios of one cisco's router (model 1750) with 4 Mb (flash). Someone can
help me?
Thanks.
Marcia
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60839t=60839
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Thank you for the response. Another peice of the puzzle is that I believe
there are two way to influence the EIGRP Table. I could increase the
10.x.x.x tunnel bandwidth or I could advertise the 64.200.x.x network into
the EIGRP metric. Presently the 64.200.x.x network is not advertised in the
Roger,
I have a 2950G here with me. As soon as I did a No Shut on the NEW Int
VLAN, the old Int VLAN shutdown. So your scenario should work out ok.
Remember your switch will need a default gateway on the new network. This
could be an issue, since the ip default-gateway command overwrites,
Steve
Thanks for your information.
I would love to go for the Cisco approach especially I am working on the
CCSP as well.
However, I got overruled by my boss.
Dennis
steve wrote:
hi,
it really depends on how you want to implemnet it ...
the cisco stuff comes as a physicall probe
Hi,
I have an Aironet 350 AP and USR 2216 802.11b cards on the clients. The
signal remains Very Good most of the time...but then totally drops randomly.
The following is part of the log..
01:22:45 (Info): Disassociating [ ], reason Sender is Leaving (has
left) BSS
01:05:27 (Info):
Every port on a Layer 2 switch has its own MAC address, per IEEE 802.1D.
ira wrote:
hallo,
I have a q regarding switches.
Does any interf have a separate MAC address ?
Is there a diff betw managed / unmanaged switches
Those are marketing terms. You have to get the tech specs to know what
Sure, where are you? I'll have a salesdude stop by!!!
Need maintanence too???
Dave
Marcia Metran wrote:
Team
I need ios of one cisco's router (model 1750) with 4 Mb (flash). Someone
can
help me?
Thanks.
Marcia
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest
Don't forget the Simplicity Principle! :-) I liked MADMAN's answer best.
He's a CCIE and it shows.
Without some idea of the fellow's topology, we can't recommend VLANs, and,
although I know VLANs are extremely popular and the obvious choice for some
situations, they add complexity that may not be
I have configured the peer neighbor, also checked the ospf cost which is
more than the Ethernet and also point to point configured on BRi.
I checked the ospf database but it was not showing the DNA bit was set.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
neil
Eisert, James A (Jad) % wrote in message
[EMAIL
I'd recommend finding some firmware/drivers updates. :) That fixes most
of the issues with old drivers for the Cisco AP 350 Wireless Cards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Dain Deutschman
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:12 PM
To:
Are you doing any type of redistribution on these routers?
neil K. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have configured the peer neighbor, also checked the ospf cost which is
more than the Ethernet and also point to point configured on BRi.
I checked the ospf
The only classes I've taken were either at Ascolta, or self study of various
ciscopress titles. My bkgd is almost entirely isp, with very little
enterprise, so I need to get those areas up.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Nakao
To:
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 9:03 AM
I am currently preparing for the written portion of the CCIE track.
How should I approach this?
1.Should I just focus on the written, once that is out of the way focus on
the lab
or
2.As I prepare for the written also work on lab scenarios
Message Posted at:
you are correct to assume that you have to disable
vlan 1 before before you can enable vlan 2
you are also correct that the instant that you shut the
vlan 1 down you will disconnect the connection on your telnet..
you should be able to telnet thru the network to the switch if you
have a
Added the bandwidth statement to the tunnel and to the interface. As well
added the interface 66.200.x.x to eigrp statement. Problem is that the link
will not use the 10.x.x.x in the table.
Has anyone tried to influence EIGRP to use a tunnel 10.x.x.x instead of a
192.x.x.x frame relay link? Any
I liked the comment and definitely agree that some of the authors of Cisco
training material should be named and publicly humiliated, although the
sheer volume of mistakes could make this a somewhat overwhelming task for
the public doing the humiliating. Still, I want to add my opinion that Cisco
At 9:49 PM + 1/10/03, LOON wrote:
I am currently preparing for the written portion of the CCIE track.
How should I approach this?
1.Should I just focus on the written, once that is out of the way focus on
the lab
or
2.As I prepare for the written also work on lab scenarios
Definitely #2.
And more importantly, from a semantics perspective - is a horrible kludge
a bad thing or a good thing? Or a case of two wrongs not making a right.
... double negatives are fun.
Thanks!
TJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Doug S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
BTW, it works perfectly well with HSRP also: 2 routers connecting an area to
area 0.
JFD
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60856t=60654
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
At 10:12 PM + 1/10/03, Doug S wrote:
I liked the comment and definitely agree that some of the authors of Cisco
training material should be named and publicly humiliated, although the
sheer volume of mistakes could make this a somewhat overwhelming task for
the public doing the humiliating.
Doug,
I used the term horrible kludge several hours before I saw your post.
The multiple NAT pool kludge is horrible because it is neither scalable
nor maintenance-free, nor does it include any dynamic distribution of
load across the resultant multiple (outside local) addresses in use. It
almost
Good luck..
However you will get latency and jitter issues during the time the PIXs
encrypt/decrypt the voice packets...
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
Simer Mayo
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003 6:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
62 matches
Mail list logo