Sean Kim wrote:
> There isn't any problem with connection of performance. But I am very
> curious about why this is happening.
> Does anybody have any idea why this would happen? Or can anybody give me a
> clue as to how to approach this problem?
Think MTU difference.
Regards,
Hello,
My company has this 3rd party connection through ATM. The ATM TA has an
ethernet outlet which is and connected to our core router. Our parner
company is connected with anATM module on their router.
Recently, I was told by our partner company that they were running ping test
and they could
L3 is usually considered to be wire speed and uses faster
asics...
Routers such as 7200/7500 use older slower hardware to
route...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Nanda"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: Layer3 Routers VS
Well am again confused, because the thing which was in my mind that
access-group acl_in in interface inside means that the access-list binds to
the inside interface for the outbound traffic not the inbound traffic!
I agree that the command access-group acl_out in interface outside mean that
the a
Thanks Priscilla, the " fist example permits TCP coming into the outside
interface. The second example permits traffic coming into the inside
interface." Made the concept clear.
Thanks again.
Ismail Al-Shelh
Abdulla Fouad Company
Network Engineer
CD-Dammam
-Original Message-
From: Pri
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If nothing's plugged in, it has to drop the packets!?! :-) Are you sure
this
> isn't normal? Being a switch, it shouldn't be sending any unicasts out the
> port, because it couldn't have learned a MAC address that is out that
p
I'am working on a Boson's CCIE lab with a friend and we are working on
setting up privilege levels for users who need to telnet to the router.
User1 needs to have access to just the user level commands nothing more.
User2 needs access to all the commands that user 1 has access to as well as
about
A couple of PIX 501s would be a really good solution for you. If you are
running call mangler at one or both locations, you could also tie some of
the voice solution together as well. How many PCs do you have at each
location? If you only have one PC at one of the locations, you could
probably j
Hi all,
Just want to clear that which Pix Firewall is being used in the following
modules.
1. Cisco Security specialist.
2. Cisco VPN specialist.
3. Cisco IDS specialist.
Is it 501 or 520? Because at the moment I have got the optionto buy 501 or
520. So which one I should go for?
Message Pos
Thanks alot guys for your help.
Regards,
K. Ali
""Jens Neelsen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> my answer to this question is: You need both 5000 and 3550.
>
> The 5000 switch is used for CCNP now. and usd in many
> installations.
>
> The 3550 switch is
Sure,
Main Cisco PIX IPsec config examples:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tech_configuration_examples_list
.html
Simple PIX-to-PIX tunnel:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration
_example09186a0080094761.shtml
Best of luck,
-Zeke
Sonic Networ
Hi Guys...
We have Layer3 Switches and routers...In what scenario one would ideally use
Layer3 switches over routers..
Do They have any significant advantage over using routers
Why do they have layer3 switches when we have routers are good enough to do
the job...
I am confused...I wud apprecia
As long as it's available to everybody, that's good enough for me.
Thanks...
--- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Aidan Marks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Dennis Laganiere
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTP site needed fo
Can someone please help me to understand the following terms.
H323 and Gatekeeper. I have a polycom video conferencing equipment and I'm
trying to set up a IP to IP video connection between two cities. The
conection works, but the quality is very bad a lot of jitter and delay. I
was told by the
""Barbu Alexandru"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok! Pay attention that the access-list that is
> actually applied to the interface for inbound traffic
> is access-list 194, which denies all ip traffic.
>
> Now lets see what the other access-lists do.
>
>
I tried to upgrade Ciscoworks 2000 cd one from 4th edition to 5th edition, I
experienced a lot of problem. Also, I prefer to have fresh install rather
than upgrade. You can backup your database and restore it back after your
Ciscoworks2000 is newly installed.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
I'm not sure what you mean by hybrid mode. I have the sh ver, sh mod, sh ver
for MSFC and below. I have nothing plugged into at leat 3 ports which still
report dropped packets. 800,000 daily. Whats strange is that the 800,000 is
almost the same on all 3 ports. I have disabled them since then but w
Ok! Pay attention that the access-list that is
actually applied to the interface for inbound traffic
is access-list 194, which denies all ip traffic.
Now lets see what the other access-lists do.
access-list 195 deny udp any gt 1024 any eq 1434
access-list 195 permit ip any any
This
Try clear frame-relay map, or clear frame-relay pvc, etc
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63064&t=63055
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Non
Not real clear on your description. You see dropped packets on
interfaces with nothing plugged in!? Since you refer to the 6500 as a
switch I assume your running hybrid mode. You also mention there is an
MSFC. I ASSume again that your seeing drops on the L2 interface but
with nothing plugge
""McHugh Randy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Happy Valentines everyone
> I have a deleted PVC that still works to connect through a frame switch to
> another router. Anyone else seen this?
> Here is the config
> r1#sh frame pvc 401
>
> PVC Statistics for interfa
Sonicwall makes a good, inexpensive product for this kindof thing.
http://www.sonicwall.com/products/vpnapp.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63061&t=63042
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The first line was just a link. I guess the system didn't like it.
> This was it:
>
> http://www.csupomona.edu/~ken/website/TII/tiigeneral/index.htm
>
> >>> "Ken Diliberto" 02/14/03 10:22AM >>>
> Just a quick link
Do a show cdp neighbor and verify that the both endpoints are where you
think they are. Obviously, the ACTIVE side in the output below is where
you think it is, but I'd bet money that the opposite endpoint is not r1
as shown below, or at least not on s0.
On R1, did you move your cable from Seri
501's are great for that...
Or OpenBSD !!! Wonderful and Free!!!
-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Connecting two small offices [7:63042]
PIX 501 would be a good Cisco solutio
No work for 7 months plus tuition due means my lab must go. I would prefer
to sell complete, but will separate. Here is what I have:
CS-500 (16 ports although one is bad. It was that way when I got it)
2501 16/16 flash/ram w/ 12.0(21a) IOS
2504 16/16 flash/ram w/ 12.0(21a) firewall/IDS IOS
2521 16
The 2500 mpls images are available here:
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/rraszuk/specials/
They have been there for a while. What more do you need?
Aidan
At 07:09 AM 15/02/2003, Dennis Laganiere wrote:
>A few months ago I put together a free document for loading an experimental
>version of IOS that al
Happy Valentines everyone
I have a deleted PVC that still works to connect through a frame switch to
another router. Anyone else seen this?
Here is the config
r1#sh frame pvc 401
PVC Statistics for interface Serial0 (Frame Relay DTE)
DLCI = 401, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = DELETED, INTERFACE
A few months ago I put together a free document for loading an experimental
version of IOS that allows you to run MPLS on cheap 2500 series routers. I
didn't create the software, I just gave instructions for installing it and
then pointed out where the files were, for anybody who wanted to play wit
Hello,
I'm seeing strange things on a 6500 switch. I see dropped pakets and int
errors on interfaces with no servers plugged in. These are of signifcant
amounts and I believe tis causing problems.We're talking about 800,000 in 24
hours. Does anyone have any idea on what this happens on INT that ar
The first line was just a link. I guess the system didn't like it.
This was it:
http://www.csupomona.edu/~ken/website/TII/tiigeneral/index.htm
>>> "Ken Diliberto" 02/14/03 10:22AM >>>
Just a quick link test. These are pictures of our construction
project
to upgrade the network.
>>> "Paul Bor
Had the same problem, just upgrading to c1700-y-mz.122-8.T5.bin helped
resolve the issue.
Thanks
ADIL
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 4:19 AM
Subject: IOS 12.2 Prob?? [7:63016]
> Hi..
>
> i am trying to configure a 1721 with wic 2 A/S for Async Dialin.
[The above is a completely OT link intended for testing purposes only.
It is included again below for further testing.]
http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/broncos.htm
Ken, it appears that your link was munged. I've sent three links this
morning to a test queue and all arrived correctly. Paul
Exactly! Great points Paul, SNORT truly is top drawer. There are so many
good reasons to use it (price, continual updates etc.). I would advise
anyone interested in IDS though to consider using two variants (signature
based, anomaly based, application behavior based et al). This will provide
a
I love NESSUS, again, not that commercial products aren't or can't be as
good, but it seems to me that open source tools (for reasons we've mentioned
often here), win out in the end.
Will Gragido CISSP CCNP CIPTSS CCDA MCP
9450 W. Bryn Mawr Ave.
Suite 325
Rosemont, Il 60018
www.ins.com
[EMAIL PR
Just a quick link test. These are pictures of our construction project
to upgrade the network.
>>> "Paul Borghese" 02/14/03 08:43AM >>>
Ok, I updated our anti-mime software. Let's see if that fixes the
problem of having a URL on the first line. I personally have not been
able to duplicate the
In the case of the PIX 501 would you set up a box at each site and make them
peers? Or would you set up one office with the 501 and make the other a
slave? Or (as I am assuming) is it possible to do it either way?
Thanks,
Michael Linehan
Systems Consultant
Alignex, Inc.
952-224-5344
- Origina
PIX 501 would be a good Cisco solution, or you could go for a linux
based FW on a PC, such as Ipcop.
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2003 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Connecting two small offices [7:63042]
Great networ
Ok, I updated our anti-mime software. Let's see if that fixes the
problem of having a URL on the first line. I personally have not been
able to duplicate the problem.
Please send me any bug reports!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Great networking guru's:
I have not done much in the way of networking small offices together. I would
imagine that a private WAN link will be too expensive for the company. What
are the logical options as far as setting up VPN between two small offices
that have DSL level bandwidth?
Thanks,
Mich
BTW, for the record I am personally a big fan of snort. Snort is what I
use on my own home network. But then I'm a tech geek with limited funds,
so it fits my needs perfectly. ;-)
Regards,
Kent
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 10:32, Kent Hundley wrote:
> The term "team" was meant to by inclusive of engine
hi,
it`s even worse than you thought...
the unix director no longer exsists
...
the policy manager has now gone,and is now included as part of the new
ciscoworks VPN/Secuirty 2.1 SUITE of software...and you can`t get it
seperatly..
.
the ids hook into OV simple report`s message
The term "team" was meant to by inclusive of engineers as well as
sales. I can assure you I have talked to many competent Cisco
engineers, some of them who specialize in security, who do in fact
recommend the Cisco IDS to their large clients.
And yes, salespeople will obviously always push thei
Does the IOS/CatOS/PIX config files support commented-out descriptions?
Thanx
mkj
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63031&t=63031
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.ht
We are pretty happy with 6509 switches. Before that, 7507 routers were
responsable for packet forwarding ( more or less 96 Mbps of inter-vlan
traffic).
My only concern is about using 6509 on a MPLS backbone. From what I have
search, it is necessary a specific card.
"Peter van Oene" @groupstu
You need to enter config reg 0x2102
depends on the router..
What kind of router?
- Original Message -
From: "Johnson, Richard (NY Int)"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: Easy question [7:63002]
> Hi all,
>
>
> Every time I boot my router, it asks if I want to confi
Scanning the exam topics, specifically the second to last bullet item:
Optical Networking Designs
Describe the scalability issues of using OSPF and IS-IS as interior
gateway
protocols in a service provider network and list solutions for each
What do IGPs have to do with optical network de
In this case the issue is the URL spans more the 72 characters which is
the size most e-mail clients use as a width of a message. When you
cut/paste you do not capture the entire URL. But this is not
GroupStudy's faults, it is the fault of the client software.
But there is a case where GroupStud
You could configure LLQ for audio; but for video, I have seem some
articles saying that video could starve other traffic.
One approach would be limit your video, for example 200 Kbps, using CAR,
and after that apply LLQ.
Regards,
Hi catalyst 3548 they have been taking off the market , and that been
replast with 2948
The have this problem ( dropping packet ) in the interface if you type show
interface 0/ X
You will notes the dropped packet
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63025&t=62940
-
Hi catalyst 3548 they have been taking off the market , and that been
replast with 2948
The have this problem ( dropping packet ) in the interface if you type show
interface 0/ X
You will notes the dropped packet
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63024&t=62940
-
I am trying to upgrade to CW2000 5th edition but am having some problems.
When attempting to suspend all jobs using:
cwjava -cw install_directory com.cisco.nm.cmf.jrm.DisableJobs
I recieve the following message:
"unable to launch JVM"
Has anyone else run into this problem?
Many thanks in advan
MPLS uses the CEF table adjacencies in establishing a Label Switched Path.
Additionally, each VPN Routing and Forwarding (VRF) uses a derived CEF
table, in addition to its own forwarding table.
There's a pretty good list 'mpls-ops' hosted at mplsrc.com if you want to
get more involved in MPLS. J
I have seen this problem before.
Basically you have a layer 1 problem thus, your fiber.
Some possible problems to look at:
1. Is your fiber longer than IEEE standard?
With GBIC-SX, 550m for multi-mode
With GBIC-LH, 300m for multi-mode
With GBIC-LH with modal cable, 550m for multi-mode
With GBIC
Hello,
I think MPLS require CEF because some mechanisms like: Packets are switched
in the interrupt code using the CEF cache (FIB table). It supports
per-packet load balancing (previously only supported by process switching),
per-source/destination load balancing (only supported by CEF switching),
2) Has never talked to any of the Cisco teams that manage large global
accounts
Of course these are sales people. Sales people make their livelihood off of
the sales. So obviously, they will push the product.
Rule 1. Never trust a salesperson.
Rule 2. Never Believe a salesperson.
Rule 3. N
ahmed,
thank you for your feedback. My msfc is the 12.1(6)E1 version, anyway you'll
find below the "show version" on the L3 routing engine of my 6509. I'he
searched in the Cisco bug tool at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/launch_bugtool.pl
but I've not found any reference to any tr
Larry,
thank you for your feedback. I have found that the "nonegotiate" is
considered just a temporary workaround in this cisco document:
www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/2807_6-28.pdf
Anyway I'll check the g-bics.
Thanks again
Luca
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph
Hi..
i am trying to configure a 1721 with wic 2 A/S for Async Dialin. i am
running the IOS 12.2 (c1700-y-mz.122-4.YA2.bin) the strange thing i see is
that there is no command to configure a Modem, i wanted to enter modem
autoconfigure discovery or modem autoconfigure type. it just does not allow
m
if the config register is set incorrectly and pointing at
something like 0x2142, it will always boot
up and bypass the nvram config file. You need to change it
back to 0x2102.
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Will Gragido"
To:
Sent: Thursday,
Hi all,
I have a project on a cisco 3620 router and I want to know how can i
configure the quality of service on this router to priviledge the video
traffic over the other
sincerly
PIPPOO
_
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui p
61 matches
Mail list logo
