Check this site also
http://networking.earthweb.com/netsecur/article.php/10952_893321_1
Ismail Al-Shelh
-Original Message-
From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 1:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Config [7:63131]
Hi All,
Any one got a
HI ALL
I am onto my last exam for CCNP , however I have no study material for this
exam , I am asking for help here , can anyone help with which book/s will be
excellent material for this exam , enough for a good pass. The other exams ,
I used the Cisco course books which of course was excellent a
You need to make sure PIM is aware of the underlying FR topology.
use ip pim nbma-mode
this will keep next hop info on (*,G) and (S,G) in OIL at R6 intf S0.
hth,
Mark.
-Original Message-
From: neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 11:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
do a "clear frame inarp"
-Original Message-
From: Mung Go [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2003 23:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleted PVC still works [7:63055]
Try clear frame-relay map, or clear frame-relay pvc, etc
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
DEar Stefen,
you are doing a bit of confusion:
> so does layer 3 switching require the use of VLANs to actually do
> the switching?
It's true the contrary case: the Vlans requires L3 to be routed, or, in
other terms, to comunicate each others. The L3 switching has no sens without
VLAN
> Say f
Hi all,
I am working on a cisco 3620 router and I am trying to limit bandwidth on
the FastEthernet interface with the Bandwidth command but I still have a
superior rate than the one I choose can anyone please help me
( I have the IOS version 12.2)
sincerly
PIPPOO
_
Hi
I think ciscopress books and bosom test are always the best way
regards
""Peri Sophos"" escribis en el mensaje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> HI ALL
>
> I am onto my last exam for CCNP , however I have no study material for
this
> exam , I am asking for help here , can anyone h
just... good luck!
""Jason Dimagiba"" escribis en el mensaje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> got any last minute tips/suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jd
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63156&t=63145
-
Hi,
the bandwidth command is for information only. It does not
change the interface. It is used by routing protocols like EIGRP
to evaluate the metric and to compare different links. For
serial links the default is 1544 kbps (=T1 line) and on other
interfaces the default is the link speed (e.g. 10
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> 65xx without the MSFC card run Cat OS mode. Add the MSCF card, and you have
> hybrid mode. unless somethng has changed recently, you cannot run a 65xx in
> native IOS mode only - it has to be an L2 box alone, or a hybrid box,
> running IOS and Cat OS.
Actuall
Yes you are running hybrid. We still haven't seen the "show"
whatever that displays all these dropped packets or I missed it.
Dave
Sam Sneed wrote:
> There are no static routes to these ports. I guess I am in Hybrid mode. I
> need to enter session 15 command to connect to router module. Then
comment in-line:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Does MLS (Layer 3 switching) require VLANs? [7:63147]
DEar Stefen,
you are doing a bit of confusion:
> so does layer 3 swit
Use rate-limit instead.
HTH,
Hamid
> Hi,
>
> the bandwidth command is for information only. It does not
> change the interface. It is used by routing protocols like EIGRP
> to evaluate the metric and to compare different links. For
> serial links the default is 1544 kbps (=T1 line) and on other
Hello again!
Now is the/my time to play multi-vendor dot1q tagging. One vendor being
Cisco, of course. Other vendors will be represented by a nameless
nitial --- "F" at the high-end and "S" at the edge.
We've all heard about a/the management VLAN, and I've certainly struggled
with my little ne
I'm preparing for ccie r&s exam.
But I lived out side U.S.;Could anyone recommend any lab_workbook for
studying self?
BTW, I'm collecting for the rack equipment, is it worth to invest on voice
modules(ex.NM-1V,2FXS...etc.) for practice? I've heard that this part only
be tested very little of the La
I am completely frustrated.
I am trying to do something very simple but am having considerable trouble.
I wish only to rate-limit ALL packets coming into a particular interface on
a 3550
It does have EMI and Qos is anabled. This is the config that I have tried so
far and the packets just blast ri
On a 75XX w/ 4-50 cards, where does NAT actually happen at? Does it happen
on the VIPs or on the RSP?
I am hoping that it happens between the VIPs like dCEF
I need to setup a temp link for backup purposes and if the VIPs do the
NATing, If I can get by with an RSP2 with VIP4-50's, I won't have
Hi,
I'm looking for firewall solution for my company, we
have two WAN connections and currently my users are
connected thru two proxy m/c to Internet.
Which PIX model would server the needs.
I also need content filtering, Intrustion detection
and Anti-virus protection on firewall itself.
Is all
Peri Sophos wrote:
>
> HI ALL
>
> I am onto my last exam for CCNP , however I have no study
> material for this exam , I am asking for help here , can anyone
> help with which book/s will be excellent material for this exam
> , enough for a good pass. The other exams , I used the Cisco
> course b
> > so does layer 3 switching require the use of VLANs to actually do
> > the switching?
>
> It's true the contrary case: the Vlans requires L3 to be routed, or, in
> other terms, to comunicate each others. The L3 switching has no sens
without
> VLAN
>
Right, I understand that inter-VLAN routing r
Han Chuan Alex Ang wrote:
>
> hi, I am kind of confuse right now, is it possible to have a
> domain that is resolvable and yet I couldn't find any
> information on the internic or apnic etc, what did I miss, any
> body to shed some light
It could just be resolvable locally. Maybe your DNS server
> > Say for instance I have 2 hosts on the same layer 3 switch, but the >
two
> hosts are on 2 different IP subnets (No VLANs are defined).
>
> That's not possible! if you are talking about 2 IP subnet, than:
> -
> actually it is by doing secondaries, but i would highly reco
Happy World wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I read a lot of router/switch specifications and always find
> the above terminology. Can anyone explain the difference
> between them?
>
> Switching Capacity talking about Layer2 performance and
> Forwarding Rate is above Layer3???
Switches, routers, L3 swi
Ok, I am really struggling to understand the usefulness of VLANs here. In
the Switching exam book, it states that VLANs remove the physical boundaries
of the network and a user anywhere on the network can be a member of any
VLAN (IP subnet). Now I do understand this concept, but consider the
follow
Hi,
a layer3 switch (e.g.3550-EMI) does not have layer3 interfaces.
All interfaces (Fastethernet and GigabitEthernet) are layer2
interfaces. They can not have IP addresses.
The VLANs are the (virtual) interfaces to the routing engine
(=layer3 switch).
Layer2 interfaces are grouped into differe
With CEF (PFC 2) if there is an adjacency for the destination host, to my
understanding, that packet will never be routed. It should just be rewritten
by the PFC 2 (SP). If this correct then these are my questions.
1. How does an IOS ACL affect the rewrite on the switch?
2. Where on th
hey, Dave, request for clarification
whenever I run my config tools ( either CCO or NetFormX, which validates
against Cisco's config server anyway ), the requirement is CAT OS plus IOS.
I can go CAT OS only, but I cannot get a validation using IOS only.
So is that an error in the validation engi
can you provide a sanitized config for the access-list in question and for
the interface in question?
--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"
""Jim Devane"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am completely frustrated.
>
> I am trying to do somet
Sam Sneed wrote:
>
> If the port is no connected why would it attempt to send
> unicasts packets
> through it?
Well, notice that I said broadcasts not unicasts. It shouldn't send unicasts
to a disconnected port because it couldn't have learned of any MAC addresses
out that port. Well, while stil
Your ASCII art didn't work, at least for those of us who read this on the
Web. The posting software replaces multiple spaces with one space. Argh.
But, I think I understand your confusion and my advice is to leave L3
switches (i.e. routers) out of the scenario to understand the basic features
of V
Does anyone know if there is a book to study for new MCNS 3.0 exam? If not,
what is the "closest" one for that exam? Thanks much.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63180&t=63180
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscripti
Stephen Hoover wrote:
>
> back to switch A to get his routing to
> the servers?
> Why would you EVER want a network configured this way?? Or even
> worse, what
> if your respective gateway was 3 or 4 L3 switches away?
Your gateway can't be any L3 switches (routers) away. It has to be on your
LAN
Would anyone suggest books to study for new MCNS 3.0 exam? Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63182&t=63182
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
Just a thought, but how about when
redistributing the routes to the other protocol using a route-map at the
end and tagging the routes that came from ospf. Add another route-map
statement that any route that has been tagged deny it.
Example:
router ospf 100
redistribute rip metric 130 subnet
uh yup, but let me preface it with, "I'M AN IDIOT!" to spare myself
further embarrassment I will repeat the age-old adage "Check Layer 1 first"
I have it working now. The config posted was correct and functional just had
to remember which port to put service-policy on!!!
SmaatBits on 0/48 test
""Jens Neelsen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> a layer3 switch (e.g.3550-EMI) does not have layer3 interfaces.
> All interfaces (Fastethernet and GigabitEthernet) are layer2
> interfaces. They can not have IP addresses.
gentle correction. by entering the
""Vicky Rode"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> comment in-line:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Does MLS (Layer 3 switching) requir
>Happy World wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I read a lot of router/switch specifications and always find
>> the above terminology. Can anyone explain the difference
>> between them?
>>
>> Switching Capacity talking about Layer2 performance and
>> Forwarding Rate is above Layer3???
>
>Switches,
Jens,
MY 3550-EMI certainly can have layer 3 interfaces. All you need to do is to
enter the command "no switchport" on the interface. Check out this link:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12112cea/3550cr/cl
i2.htm#xtocid104
I quote:
switchport
Use the switchport inter
I've been following this thread, and have offered a comment or two along the
way. Perhaps I should offer some thoughts here at the source.
note that I have not read any of the exam study materials in question, so I
don't know what is or is not being stated in the courseware. I can offer
that just
""Debbie Westall"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just a thought, but how about when
>
> redistributing the routes to the other protocol using a route-map at the
> end and tagging the routes that came from ospf. Add another route-map
> statement that any route
Some comments in-line. It is becoming (has become?) very difficult if not
impossible to tease out the "switch" from the "router" with PFC2/MSFC2.
This box has the functions of both, and they are integrated in the hardware.
For example, the Layer 2 switching engine, the Qos engine and the ACL
e
Do you have a good link. I would like to know more. Thanks.
Why such a change from the PFC1/MSFC1. The concept you describe
below seems to be a big change. I knew there were intergrating but I could
still define the seperation between router and switch with the PFC1/MSFC1.
GOTTA BE ON YOUR Ps and
This might help. What does the V stand for in VLAN? Virtual. VLANs are a
method for emulating Real LANs in a switched network. The original poster
seems disillusioned with VLANs. Well, I am too. :-) You can't do much with
them that you can't do with a bunch of Real LANs connected by routers.
First
Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the routing
capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches were connected in
that case, then connected to the core, wouldn't that solve the problem of a
gateway being 3 or 4 L3 switches away?
-Original Message-
From: Prisci
comments inline.
--- Jens Neelsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a layer3 switch (e.g.3550-EMI) does not have layer3
> interfaces.
> All interfaces (Fastethernet and GigabitEthernet)
> are layer2
> interfaces. They can not have IP addresses.
On the 3550, you can have IP addresses on the actual
interface if
good for you, Cil. This discussion was ( and still is, to judge from my
in-box ) filled with misdirection and poor information. Cisco and all the
other vendors are absolutely to blame for this.
a router is a function, not a device
so is a switch.
what does it matter where the function resides, o
Offhand (without research and verification), I would
say the native VLAN wouldn't have the 802.1p info
since the native VLAN is not tagged at all. Correct me
if I'm wrong.
This is an area I need to look into... I had a similar
issue last week with a 6509 to 3600 router 1q trunk
where LLQ wasn't ma
>Hello guys,
>
>Mark is right, you can designate any other area as the backbone
>area. I configured a hub router with area 1 and two spoke routers
>with area 2 and 3, with each spoke a link to area 1. Works 100% ok,
>full routing table, full reachability.
>
>Regards,
>
>Georg
But is the source
Stephen Hoover wrote:
>
> Ok, let me see if I can simply this:
>
> A post that Jens Neelsen made says "a layer3 switch
> (e.g.3550-EMI) does not
> have layer3 interfaces. All interfaces (Fastethernet and
> GigabitEthernet)
> are layer2
> interfaces. They can not have IP addresses."
He was just t
Valentine's day marked the 20th anniversary of this event. I thought it
might bear repetition.
--
Upon "learing by rote" testing products:
--
Here's a little story from the Bering Sea. Bear w
TEAM,
Which lab workbook (R&S) do you guys recommend for preparing for the
lab...I want to buy only one(which one). If possible I would like your
response with valid information based on your experience with any of the
products mention below. I am very interesting in (Hello Computers and
CCBoot
Enjoy this example
PIX Version 6.2(1)
nameif ethernet0 outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside security100
enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
hostname pixfirewall
domain-name ciscopix.com
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol h323 h
Emilia Lambros wrote:
>
> Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the
> routing capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches
> were connected in that case, then connected to the core,
> wouldn't that solve the problem of a gateway being 3 or 4 L3
> switches away?
Your
Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:10:23
GMT cannot be delivered because the intended recipient has left the Company.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63202&t=63202
--
FAQ, list archives, and
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:10:23
> GMT cannot be delivered because the intended recipient has left the
Company.
>
oh joy, another six months of messages like this until the list gets cleaned
up.
Mes
> > -
> > actually it is by doing secondaries, but i would highly recommend doing
> > vlans if possible. keep it clean and simple.
>
>
> one may also configure the physical interfaces as L3 interfaces - just as
> one might do on a router with several ethernet ports.
Oo
Ok, let me see if I can simply this:
A post that Jens Neelsen made says "a layer3 switch (e.g.3550-EMI) does not
have layer3 interfaces. All interfaces (Fastethernet and GigabitEthernet)
are layer2
interfaces. They can not have IP addresses." Further he adds "The VLANs are
the (virtual) interfaces
hi,
comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The Long and Winding Road
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Does MLS (Layer 3 switching) require VLANs? [7:63147]
""Vicky Rode"" wrote in me
""Stephen Hoover"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > -
> > > actually it is by doing secondaries, but i would highly recommend
doing
> > > vlans if possible. keep it clean and simple.
> >
> >
> > one may also configure the physical interfac
You cannot rely on traceroute to show you all the router interfaces that a
packet has been through to a destination.
Some ISPs purposely hide routers to make it look like travelling through
their domains has less hops than some other domain.
But even if there's no trickery involved, many other th
HTH,
Thank you for these comments - this clears up a lot of confusion for me.
To sum, just to make sure I really have this:
Layer 3 switching is possible without VLANs (however the opposite is not
true. Well at least not without some form of Layer 3 intervention.)
VLANs simply th
Hey all,
Came across a post on a different board by a fairly reputable CCIE
mentioning something about a daughter card to enhance the performance of the
switch when running EMI code. I've been all over CCO looking for ANY
reference to this mysterious card, but can find none. Has anybody else
I appreciate everyone's input on this subject to help me understand this
concept.
As far as the newbies comment goes - I most definitely am. I'm about as
green as they come. I have both my CCNA and my CCDA, but my only real
experience is installing 2 T1s (at different locations) and configuring NA
Then explain to me what the ip address is doing that is
assigned to my
fast ethernet and gig interfaces on my 3550 and that also
shows up in the routing
table as a router interface. I have no vlans configured
other than the default...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original
Hi.. I saw my PIX syslog message state the following, Can anyone explain
to me what is the meaning
302010: 0 in use, 10 most used
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junk
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Debbie Westall"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Just a thought, but how about when
> >
> > redistributing the routes to the other protocol using a route-map at
Stephen,
This is getting out of hand, so let me answer your original post based
on what I can see from your drawing.
First, if you have users in Bldg B that want to communicate with users
in Bldg A on the SAME VLAN1, then your "core" L3 switches will see the
VLAN ID and switch the packets from ingr
Hi.. Dear Senior..
I know that in checkpoint, we can create fule in such a way that whenever
checkpoint firewall external interface was contacted by specific traffic, it
will log a message to the firewall log stating the what is source IP and
what traffic is that such as follows.
17Feb2003 21:
its entirely possible without vlans..majority of the cisco
campus is networked with
layer 3 switches and not using vlans
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Hoover"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Does MLS (Lay
> Emilia Lambros wrote:
> >
> > Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the
> > routing capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches
> > were connected in that case, then connected to the core,
> > wouldn't that solve the problem of a gateway being 3 or 4 L3
> > switche
I'm resisting the overwhelming urge to say something like "So there's not a
problem?" but the two L3/L2/Router/switch discussion are just so darned
informative!
I think there's a bit of a hole of confusion that I fell into the first time
I consoled onto a 2950 and had to configure it. Every inter
All,
I'd like to add to this something that I haven't seen in other posts yet,
and that is a quick look at layer2 function. I have a Catalyst 6509 with an
MSFC on it. There is only *ONE* VLAN configured on the MSFC, however, that
VLAN has several secondary addresses assigned to it (I know, not
For some reason my responses are taking a REALLY long time to get to the
list in relation to other people's responses, so the conversation is losing
continuity.
I sent an email at 8:55PM CST and I am writing this at 10:19PM CST and my
8:55 post still has not made it to the list.
This is adding to
I would recommend a well-rounded set of prep material. Out of all of
them, CCBootCamp is the most consisten and widest range of simper to
very complex labs to attack all of the difficulties you want to see.
As for the voice stuff, it is increasing in its point value on the exam.
So I wouldn't blo
Everybody. How are you guys.
1)WS-G5484, WS-G5486, and WS-G5487 are all Optical GBICs -What command can I
use on a 6500 switch to identify which of the above GBIC's currently
installed in the switch?
sh ver doesn't seem to give me information on this.
2) Conceptual questions on PIX (i am learning
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ""Debbie Westall"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Just a thought, but how about when.
hi stephen,
see comments in-line:
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Vicky Rode
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Does MLS (Layer 3 switching) require VLANs? [7:63147]
> > Say for instance I have 2 hosts on
> > > -
>> > actually it is by doing secondaries, but i would highly recommend doing
>> > vlans if possible. keep it clean and simple.
>>
>>
>> one may also configure the physical interfaces as L3 interfaces - just as
>> one might do on a router with several ethernet po
The nit I'm picking is inline... (I'm feeling like chipping in tonight)
>>> "The Long and Winding Road"
02/17/03 06:13PM >>>
[snip]
if I have a 75xx router with 300 ethernet ports, and I bridge all
those
ports, do I have an L3 switch, or a router?
[KD]
You have a router performing L2 operation
Hamed,
You can try this command "no ip unreachable" under your serial interface
Paul
Hamed Sedighi wrote:
> Dear Sirs/Madams,
>
> I restricted ICMP protocol on my input serial port as following:
>
> access-list 102 deny icmp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 echo
>
> At now, when a person do PING
use Sh mod
>From: "Bill"
>Reply-To: "Bill"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: PIX Questions [7:63226]
>Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 04:46:29 GMT
>
>Everybody. How are you guys.
>
>1)WS-G5484, WS-G5486, and WS-G5487 are all Optical GBICs -What command can
>I
>use on a 6500 switch to identify which
I'm loath to continue this discussion, but I do have a question for Kelly.
Why do you have a VLAN at all in your example?? Isn't a single VLAN sort of
like one hand clapping? Seriously, what role is it playing in your network?
Of course you don't have to have VLANs to do routing/L3 switching, as y
10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0---515E PIX FIREWALL--1750
ROUTER10.15.0.0 255.255.0.0
10.15.0.0 Is the inside network
10.10.10.0 Is the outside network
In CISCO PIX FIREWALL Version 6.1(4), what is the impact of this command?
access-list acl_out permit ip 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.1
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm loath to continue this discussion, but I do have a question for Kelly.
> Why do you have a VLAN at all in your example?? Isn't a single VLAN sort
of
> like one hand clapping? Seriously, what role is it pl
Ken,
Thanks for the input on this discussion. I follow and understand your
example without any problems.
Now if taking it back to the original original question - Does L3
switching require VLANs - produces this question for your example:
You state 1 fiber feed for both Science and En
I apologize for the duplicate posts. I did not realize that when I hit
reply, the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] would post back to the list as
well. That's what I get for being a listener and not a poster :)
Stephen Hoover
Dallas, Texas
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=
Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent Tue, 18 Feb 2003 06:36:46
GMT cannot be delivered because the intended recipient has left the Company.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63238&t=63238
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Hi,
I need to connect two offices with VPN. They both can only get an
Internet Connection with dynamic IP addresses, static addressing is not
possible.
Is there a possibility to establish a connection?
Thanks in advance.
Tarry
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=
89 matches
Mail list logo
