I believe 13 is the ifindex number.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tony Chen
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: show spanning-tree command and the port number [7:42239]
The following is the captured
for the input, but how does int fa0/1 got translated into 13, and int
fa0/2 got translated to 14 and so on.
Tony
Bill Carter 04/22/02 01:27PM
I believe 13 is the ifindex number.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tony Chen
Sent: Monday, April
I have done this. In a large network CiscoWorks 2000 Resource Manager
Essentials is invaluable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tim Champion
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 5:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IOS Documentation [7:41577]
Sup3 is IP only right nowCome One Cisco at least get the IPX on there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cisco Breaker
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]
Can
, and then see what works for a routing protocol. In a poorly
designed large network it doesn't matter if you are running OSPF, EIGRP, or
IS-IS.
Have I done a good job of not answering your question??? Email me if you
want to discuss this further.
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
-Original Message
Its giving you that message because you can't install CiscoWorks 2000 on a
PDC or a BDC. It must be installed on either a WinNT or Win2K server that
is not a PDC or a BDC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:03 AM
To:
Last time I saw this the clock rate command was missing from the Cisco
interface config. The tech said the config was good. I looked through it
and saw it missing. Don't know if he forgot or it disappeared.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Teltone is ok, easy config. Sometimes can be flaky but reboots fix it. I
found it is better to shutdown the bri interface. make configuration
changes the no shut.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:43 PM
To: [EMAIL
show access-l
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pix question [7:39560]
whats the equivelent of show access-list on the pix
George Gittins
Internet Systems Manager
Weslaco, Tx
It relates to DECnet using the mac address of the interface to derive the
DECnet address. You need to configure DECnet, then HSRP using standby
use-bia.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:26
I did the upgrade sort of. We got a new server to run it on. I did a fresh
install of 3.3 on the new Win2k server. I then imported from a file to old
inventory list. I has to manually import IOS and CatOS images. 3.3 is
definitely an improvement. I just received word from TAC that 3.4
Screwdriver, wrench, hammer do they cable need to work afterwards.
Sorry, couldn't help it..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
PING
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Flapping [7:38822]
I am
shutting down the interface doesn't work when testing backup interface. The
router is pretty smart and can tell the difference between Admin down and
down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Matthew Meiers
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002
That software version is fine. I run it on 200 Cat 3500XL's and 2900XL's.
Sounds like you are have a duplex mismatch problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
sam sneed
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This works well. follow these steps for adding hardware. Failover doesn't
work if hardware configurations are different. You should
1. power down the primary
2. Install card in primary
2. power down secondary
3. power up primary
4. install card in secondary
5. power up secondary
Here is the
HSRP on the Ethernet Interfaces of your 2 routers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]
Hello i have a
If the device in question has Smartnet, a CCIE can automatically go to Level
2 live handoff. They assume you have done the basic trouble shooting and
CCO research. Not sure if CCIE gets free TAC support if there is no
smartnet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
the = means it is included in a product, like software on a router or a
blade on a switch.
Don't know why
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Muthuraja Ayyanar
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco
My company is a Cisco Voice partner and a 3Com Voice Partner. The office I
work out of uses the 3Com NBX for about 20 phones. It works, no real
complaints. Some of the earlier versions of code were pretty bad.
Downsides, NBX has 1 hard drive, if it goes we are down. No way to backup.
3Com may
The 3640 will work for you. I would definitely max out the RAM. Some
others have commented about not needing full BGP route tables. My customers
have been very happy with partial tables as described in the following CCO
link. I have also had customers use 2 2650's, 1 T-1 per connection box,
I just got a catalogue from www.l-m.com that has Cisco cables for a good
price.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kwame
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Looking for V.35 Cables [7:33619]
Looking for a
I have been seeing a lot of problems with 3COM NIC's If the switch is
forced 100/full and the NIC is auto we get a lot of errors, if NIC is forced
100/Full errors go away. If Switch and 3Com NIC left to auto switch will
come up 100/full and NIC 100/half.
You have to make sure the NIC is also
I have been happy with 6.3(4). I would want to hold off on the 7.1(1). No
experience with it, but it seems on the Cats early revisions can sometimes
be flaky.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tay Chee Yong
Sent: Wednesday, January 30,
: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Have you checked the utilization on those 2650's? I'd bet it's never gotten
above 15%. The 2650's can handle a lot more than 1 t-1's worth of traffic.
-Ejay
-Original Message-
From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:24
It would be a great help to have Intel NIC's as the built in NIC an
Dell's!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
juno vtv
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved
I wonder if these cards would have problems with 3Com switches
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203]
When I ran into the problem with 3Com NIC's in new Dell, the solution was to
download a driver/maintenance disk from either Dell or 3Com, and make it
bootable. We then went into the hardware configuration of the NIC and
disabled power management and WakeOnLan.
-Original Message-
From:
I had the same problem. Never got it resolved until I reinstalled NT and
Ciscoworks 2K/Campus Manager.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dandi Darsana
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CiscoWorks 2000:
access-group outbound in interface inside
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: help with outbound statement [7:33085]
i inputed this command ,
access-list outbound deny ip
You are having a problem with how your network is being announced to the
Internet. The Internet as a whole has 1 preferred path back to your
network. Check with some route-servers to verify this (see below). You
could try as-path prepending toward the provider who all you inbound traffic
is
You should also look at set option debounce and set port debounce. These
commands were added to deal with NIC vendors (3Com) who were staying from
the IEEE Ethernet standards. Basically electrical signals from the NIC
would go link up/down/up/down and the switch would see it as the card going
If the static routes have the save metric, the router will load balance
traffic it sends out according to the routes. I don't like this option
because if one path goes down every other packet will fail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Managing Cisco
Network Security is good and worth the money. Haven't read the other book
yet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco security books [7:31393]
Does anyone have
No. The CSU still runs with the T-1 configuration.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
James
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame-Relay Question [7:31395]
Hello,
This might be a simple/rehashed
No. You need clear line of sight. The Aironet will cook the leaves.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cisco aironet question [7:30926]
Will two Cisco
I have been impressed with SNORT. Runs on a Linux box. BTW its free.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT - to security experts - what's the best IDS? [7:30867]
Snort seems
Your segment with PC's is private addresses. The ISP is not routing them.
You need to eenable NAT to get to the Internet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can't ping 'through'
As I said earlier TAC suggests using the
static (inside, outside) 129.174.1.0 129.174.1.0
instead of
nat (inside) 0 0 0
I found in real world the nat 0 can be very unstable. My problems were with
5.X and 6.X. nat 0 stopped working after 10 minutes even after multiple
reboots. static has
You are talking about XOT. X.25 over TCP. Try here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/116/x25_pad_xot.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
amarjeet singh
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X.28 to ip
/public/473/34.shtml#4000_ERRORS
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
To accomplish great things, we must not only act,
but also dream; not only plan, but also believe.
-Anatole France
I will give $5 to anyone who wears a Santa suit, stuffing and beard
included, to the lab in December and passes
Pictures required for verification!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:14 PM
http://www.elemental.net/~lf/undoc/
http://www.nthelp.com/cisco_undoc.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Keny
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hidden commands [7:29189]
Hi
I know this has
2 different networks ??? Actually network 1 would encompass network 2. Host
A would thinks Host B is on the same segment as Host A is.
If Host A and Host B were separated by a router, Host A would not be able to
talk to Host B (not counting the fact that the 2 hosts have the same IP
address).
Are you telneting to the vty ports or are you reverse telneting from a
terminal server to the console port. If so you need exec-timeout 0 0 on
con 0.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Bond
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:33 PM
I second that. We have been on a 2 year 3 boss mission to ditch IPX for 300
servers!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF or EIGRP
-
From: Bill Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Joshua Barnes
Subject: RE: ADMIN to be a CCIE? [7:28911]
Yes you can do it. You need some of the books that are talked about
here
and tons of rack time. Start with the Caslow book. CCO is an excellent
Yes. You are allowing anyone coming from 165.5.0.0 to go anywhere and
denying from anywhere to anywhere.
Not knowing you IP structure I would say.
access-list 110 permit ip x.x.x.0 0.0.0.255 (IP range assigned to dial-in)
165.5.0.0 0.0.255.255 (IP range of your internal network)
access-list
Madman is right. In the absence of more memory this should help.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/41.shtml
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Donlon
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP
yes
clear counters [Enter]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bob Perez
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Clear counters command [7:28850]
Does anyone know if you can use a clear counters command from
Just wanted to add the same behavior with OSPF. If 2 routers are on the
same Ethernet segment and a router has a secondary address and the other
router's primary address is the same subnet as the secondary, OSPF will not
form an adjacency. Also by default ospf will not advertise secondary
Yes it is overkill. Yes it is good practice to use either route-maps or
distribute lists. Control is better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
William Lijewski
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Redistribution and Filtering [7:28699]
But is it ever necessary if you're only using a single router to do the
redistribution?
Bill Carter 12/10/01 10:55:23 AM
Yes it is overkill. Yes it is good practice to use either
Sorry, wanted to add some information about OSPF behaiour and secondary
addresses.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RIP routing (2 router lab) newbie [7:28327]
Just wanted
Yes that is true. A layer 3 device is needed to route between subnets.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Christian Fredrickson
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst Layer 2 question [7:28710]
Is
First on the PIX try clear xlate
On the router clear arp *
You have an access-list acl_ping but it is not applied. To apply an
access-list you need access-group acl_ping in interface outside
but there is an implied deny all at the end of the access-list.
If you had the access-list applied
Someone has
way
ttoo mmuuucchhh
iiimm
ttt
I don't want anyone to break the NDA, but is this on the CCIE lab?? The
trick is, you would have to use
service compress-config
ip route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 R2D2
ip route 2.2.2.0 255.255.255.0 C3PO
Router bgp 4
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 5
neighbor 1.1.1.1 ebgp-multihop GalaxyFarFarAway
Set the default gateway of the host to the router. The router should handle
this function.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
BASSOLE Rock
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX [7:28083]
Hi group,
This is a new virus going around. note the file gone.scr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Aderion Brewer
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hi [7:28107]
How are you ?
When I saw this screen saver, I
You have to have IP connectivity to your neighbor before BGP will work.
Static routes will get you the same thing as RIP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stephen C
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP
It may work, but in real world redistributing from IGP to BGP is very bad
practice.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Stephane LITKOWSKI
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP question [7:27879]
You
HSRP.
What are your experiences with dual homing like this?
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
To accomplish great things, we must not only act,
but also dream; not only plan, but also believe.
-Anatole France
Yes, with a Layer 3 blade.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
William
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 4006 [7:27472]
dear all,
can the 4006 run on layer 3?
Message Posted at:
If you have it enabled, you can http to the router and set the enable
password. Otherwise call someone at the site
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hansraj Patil
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
access-list 101 deny icmp any x.y.z.0 0.0.0.255 echo (from anywhere to your
IP subnet)
access-list 101 permit ip any any
int s0 (your interface facing the Internet)
ip access-group 101 in
no ip unreachables
no ip directed-broadcast
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A customer of mine is preparing for a conversion from Netware IPX to IP
only. Total network is 350+ servers. 98% are Netware 5.1. On Netware 5.1,
when 2 servers can communicate through IP they will use IP for all
communications.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I have worked with it on 5500's. Customer is a large Novell shop and would
periodically have some interesting broadcast storms. Usually a print server
and a tech's PC would get into some kind of argument. Works good. I set
the limits ~20%-30%. Low enough to stop any device from getting to
Etherchannel make the link 1 logical connection. Therefore, one STP
interface. If one link fails it becomes a single connection, so you are
still up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
DAGENHARDT Frank
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001
The config is correct, although you need to find out what IPX encapsulation
is. Probably 802.2. I would put the commands in this way;
interface vlan 2
ip address ..
ipx network 101 encapsulation sap
interface vlan 3
ip address
ipx network 102
Yes, Its a very good router.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Raul De La Garza III
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 7206 VXR [7:24692]
Has anyone had any experience with a Cisco product called
I have been in the networking business for 7 years and have worked at both
consulting companies and in-house at businesses. I prefer consulting. I
travel at most 1 every 3 months and usually 1 night/2day. I work for a
Chicago based company, but I am in Springfield, IL, the State Capitol. I
I liked the travel more than my wife. I was flying home Friday afternoon
and flying out Sunday afternoon. That was 4 years ago and I still haven't
used the free Frequent Flyer ticket I earned.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October
this.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
To accomplish great things, we must not only act,
but also dream; not only plan, but also believe.
-Anatole France
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I would send all external connections through the Firewall.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tom Richs
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
prefix-list NoSmall seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 24
then
clear ip bgp X.X.X.X soft in
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 4:20 PM
You might want to look at Cisco Resource Manager Essentials. It has a good
syslog tool that lets you look and messages broken down by either severity
level or device.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/wr2k/rsmn/
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
Violent Femmes
Why can't I get..Just one Screw?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Way OT but pretty funny [7:21210]
Sorry, this really struck
same.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ray Smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 4000 Configuration [7:20996]
Guys
facility.
Can't stress enough the importance of the laid back atmosphere in Halifax.
You don't want to be stressed out before you arrive at the Testing center.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I believe this is a bug. I have the same issue with 6.0(1) Not sure if
6.1(1) fixed it.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Urooj's Hi-speed Internet
Sent: Sunday
D00BE
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cute IPX addresses compiled [7:20864
Get a 5500 instead.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dan Faulk
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serious advice needed from CCIE
He also has a BGP config that is real good.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam Deckert
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how
I had heard that this feature was added to special IOS version distributed
to a couple a SP's. Glad to see it finally making it to mainstream.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
no keepalive
The Ethernet interface would always be up!!
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
???
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18637t=18637
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
don't intend for this to be derogatory
against TAC.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18471t=18471
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17994t=17994
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
yes.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/793/access_dial/ip_nego.html
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
ofalt andy
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL
another helpful url is
http://www.cisco.com/search
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passed Written [7
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passed Written [7:17466]
another helpful url is
http://www.cisco.com
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passed Written [7:17466]
another helpful url is
http://www.cisco.com
There is a bug when logging synchronous is used on the vty or console ports.
I hit this issue also.
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Donlon
Sent: Friday, August
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Wojtek Zlobicki
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Which Cisco router for SOHO/HOME Use ? [7:16583]
What router would one want
The WAN CSU/DSU is covered under smartnet!!
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
Bill Carter
CCIE 5022
^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Jones
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: To CSU/DSU
Yes the router will run BGP. No you should not receive full BGP tables with
64MB RAM. I would suggest, at a minimum a Cisco 3600 with 128Mb DRAM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
suaveguru
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:44 AM
To:
The net statements identifies networks, local to the router, which will
participate in OSPF. The net command should designate the network in which
the interface belongs. It is not possible to have an interface participate
in OSPF w/out the subnet of that interface also participating in OSPF.
I'm having trouble with this AS-Path situation. I have 2 routers (A and B)
running iBGP to each other.
Each router has a single eBGP connection to a different service provider.
ISP-AISP-B
| |
A---B
From ISP A I am receiving partial routes, basically network within its
Architectures.
This sample has all the standard disclaimers. I would typically have a lot
more in filter lists and access-lists but you can't include everything...
Hope that helps.
Ed
Bill Carter wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm having trouble with this
The first question is how many locations are we talking about. I would
prefer the 1720 routers. These have the same processor as the 2600's.
Don't worry about the VPN features, just don't configure them and it's not
an issue. These are marketed as VPN routers because of the processing
power.
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
