If we look at this question in terms of moving the network mask to the left
or to the right, all of these terms come into perspective.
Take the mask ...
Ones indicate the network portion. Zeros indicate the host portion.
If we shrink ( move to the left ) the zero
Just to be argumentative, it is not necessarily true that 500 hosts on a
single network / wire will result in a crippled network. As always, it is
the usage that will determine the result.
I once interviewed with a very large bank. The network team there was
required to have extensive protocol an
There have been at least two reports on group study over the last couple of
weeks. I wrote one of them. Rodgers Moore wrote another.
You should be able to find them in the recent archives.
Both of us agreed that the blueprint Cisco published on CCO is very
accurate.
Chuck
-Original Message
The connection is actually from OSPF router ID ( RID ) to router i.d.
In the case of Doyle, his example is so nicely numbered that the RIDs and
the loopback addresses are the same. ;->
I am guessing that this is one of the gotcha's that evil lab proctors might
throw into the break-fix, or maybe
Recently an instructor in a class I was taking said something I found
interesting. I hope I can do justice to his words.
Network layer:IP IP IP
Transport layer: TCP UDP
Application layer: BGPRIP EIGRP, OSP
Howard, I know we've had this discussion before here on groupstudy. I also
accept that there remains a lot of confusion of OSI terminology with PC
terminology. I.e. application on a PC versus OSI application.
That said, I am looking at the Certification Zone OSI paper. In it is the
statement that
This seems as good a place as any to throw in this book review
I'm currently reading Advanced IP Routing in Cisco Networks by Terry
Slattery and Bill Burton
( McGraw Hill ISBN 0-07-058144-4 )
Very good book, particularly when you approach it with the understanding
that:
1) this is not a substit
Adele, are you talking two ip addresses on the same interface as in
secondary addressing?
Ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Ip address 172.24.3.17 255.255.240.0 secondary
This can be done on serial interfaces as well as ethernet interfaces
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Howard commented:
>
>That said, I am looking at the Certification Zone OSI paper. (which
>version? I did one.)
It was the OSI paper by someone else of the same name and a different
CertificationZone with the same url ;->
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Just to put in some empirical data, I set up two routers on an Ethernet
link, in the classic OSPF broadcast scenario. Hello time is 10 seconds. Dead
time 40 seconds ( 4xhello )
I determined which of the two routers was the DR, and which was the BDR
I then plugged into and monitored from the BDR,
Know what they call the guy who finishes last in his med school
class?...Doctor!
As someone who passed each of the CCNP tests by fewer than 20 points, all I
can say is CONGRATULATIONS
And keep on learning!
Good going.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
It is, of course, unethical for me to name names, but I do know of at least
one high school with 600 or so workstations, where the Cisco sales force
sold a 6509!
I am also currently working with a client ( large and profitable publicly
held company ) that is deploying 6509s in a number of wareho
In the VoIP world, just about all of the terminology comes from the
telco/PBX world.
The FXO interface connects to a PBX ( or PSTN ) and dial tone is obtained
from there
The FXS interface provides dial tone such that you can plug a phone directly
into it and call another phone connected via an FX
Can someone perhaps help educate me here. I have now seen this on a couple
of posts, did a bit of reading, and have learned that stub and totally
stubby areas are not necessarily limited to a single ingress/egress point.
I.e. can have more than one ABR.
Area0---Area1 area 1 is a stub area (
to quote a great rock band from the distant past
it ain't me, babe!
no! no! no! it ain't me babe!
it ain't me you're looking for!
now name that band! :->
"Peter I. Slow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have any idea about t
Everyone who's been around more than a week or two knows about optsys
www.optsys.net
or e-mail Brad Ellis at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tell him I sent you. I'm working him for a discount ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
Green
Don't believe I saw an answer to this one. Of course it is late and my
glasses need cleaning
There is a context to everything.
A metric is a measure of something. With RIP it is hops, with IPX it is
ticks. One might argue that cost is really another term for metric, but I
suppose that is not
I guess what I am saying ( after reading Howard's response ) is that cost IS
the metric that OSPF uses
Again, metric is jut a measure. RIP uses hop counts for the metric. OSPF
uses cost. (E)IGRP uses a composite consisting of bandwidth, delay, load,
reliability, and MTU as it's metric. ( or "meas
I can't resist..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Peter Abraham
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:CCIE Inquiries
Good day all,
I have two questions.
(1) W
Privilege exec level configurations allowing those logged in via telnet only
certain commands.
This can be excruciating sometimes, depending on what you want to permit.
And getting rid of them can be real fun ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
How do you know you're a security candidate? The results out yet? :->
Seriously - this is great. Folks like you continue to be an inspiration to
al of us.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of aaa
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 1:
Set portfast on.
I have also seen issues like this with particular vendor equipment. In my
case it was HP Vectra computers. In those cases it wasn't portfast, but a
bad registry entry that had to be deleted.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] O
I'm no place where I can check, but if memory serves, there is a decent
discussion of this in Howard Berkowitz's book Designing Addressing
Architectures.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Julian Eccli
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2
Hh. don't ever recall reading that OSPF took "congestion" into
consideration when creating its routing databases.
OSPF will load balance across up to four equal cost paths. There might be
some issues with per packet versus per destination, depending upon the type
of caching enabled or not
So with OC3, packet over sonet is the layer two? Or ATM? Depending?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 3:19 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: Billy Monroe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: OSPF Load Balance/Metric
On
Quintero Guerini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 3:23 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Billy Monroe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: OSPF Load Balance/Metric
cost = 10 at the power of 8 / bandwidth
cost is the metric that ospf uses... Eigrp uses a composite metri
I've actually done something like this in a lab. I wrote about it on the
list a few months back. I am e-mailing you the configs in a separate
message. ( too big for Paul to let through to the list ) but a relevant
excerpt follows:
Router A
interface Tunnel0
ip address 172.17.1.1 255.255.0.0
tun
Of course, Charles, I'll lay odds you won't get end to end ip connectivity
anyway, given that mess you have created in the middle! :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Cthulu, CCIE Candidate
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 5:15
at what layer does the second line work, as opposed to the first line?
therein lies your answer
Chuck
"Sisqo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8uq9lf$75v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8uq9lf$75v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Access-list 101 permit ip any any
> Access-list 101 deny tcp any any eq ftp
>
>
You know, Charles, I've been pondering this setup for a while now. ( See -
you did too get me after all! :-> )
Now I already posted the wisecrack about the mess in the middle, and whether
or not you would even be able to get IP connectivity end to end here.
RouterA: ethernet EIGRP, serial=OSPF
R
126.213.64.0 = 0100 .0
126.213.95.0 = 0111 .0
subnet
mask = 1100 .0 = ?
do you
see it? the summarization boundary occurs at the last point to the left where
all bits in both rows are the same. in your example, that is at the point
between the 64 and the 32 position. or at th
According to the R&S blueprint, you should
know:
Cisco Device Operation
Commands: show, debug
Infrastructure: NVRAM, Flash, Memory & CPU,
file system, config reg
Operations: file transfers, password recovery,
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), accessing devices, securit
Interesting.
It would appear that someone at Cisco had a better sense of humor than did
someone at WinToys :->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul
Werner
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Before you all get hot thinking about CCIE specialties and the money you can
make, you may want to facto in a couple of RUMORS about the CCIE track I
heard recently.
Rumor #1 - The CCIE Design certification is being dropped. Why? Because no
one can figure what it is supposed to be or do, and the
Given the context and the choices, I would have to pick B and D as well.
The routing table recalculation isn't really a great answer either. Suppose
your links never go down, and once that last router is turned on and all the
SPF's have been done. This sucker would remain pretty quiet.
But... g
I've found over the years that it a LOT of work to be truly lazy :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:27 AM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Jim Erickson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE
it is
a nice trick, but too much work for a lazy guy like myself.
:->
I just
memorize the table - it works a lot faster
we all
know what 1-9 is in binary, or can count it up easily.
A=1010=10
B=1011=11
C=1100=12
D=1101=13
E=1110=14
F==15
write
it down on the paper before you sta
But if the "right" answer consists of two choices...
I believe we all agree that B - frequent routing recalculation - is
"correct"
I believe we all agree that A - more reachable errors - is BS
Of the two remaining choices, which is least wrong?
My reasoning was that C - frequent adjacency
EBGP multihop has nothing to do with load balancing.
As for using BGP to control incoming traffic from your ISP, I would say
there is no simple answer here. You will need to do a lot of reading and
thinking.
Basssam Halabi, Internet Routing Architectures, is a good place to start.
www.nanog.org
If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network
Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "I got no idea where this
destination address is so I won't bother with it" :->
Or something like tha
Can you provide and example? I'm a bit confused as to what this
accomplishes.
Thanks
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Jason Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:50 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Lists Wizard; 'Cisco group study
on one of my routers. It does.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Jason Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:23 PM
To: 'Chuck Larrieu'; 'Cisco group study'
Subject:RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
well
iguration for the lab. I
>did not probe for how much or what exactly being busy with the pursuit of
>CCIE R/S and Design and the job.
>
>"Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>009801c04e52$e9daf6a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:009801c04e52$e9daf6a0$[
Yes the Hutnik book is a good one to incorporate. It covers quite a few
areas of routing, and many labs can be done with only four routers.
For voice stuff, at this point you may want to consider using Cisco Config
Maker, put together some simple voice connections, and study the resulting
IOS con
In the spirit of open debate, and just to be contrary, may I hold out an
alternative viewpoint.
We have all had our fun with test questions. Just recently we had an
analysis of an OSPF related question, a very interesting thread, and one
well worth checking out in the archives if you missed it.
CBAC, other types of access-lists, PIX configuration basics, security
policy, AAA, types of security threats, IPSec, ISAKMP, things like that.,
is my recollection.
It is not a difficult test, but it does require familiarity with the way
cisco does security. I believe it would be advantageous to
Wrong list again, Howard. That's twice today.
Discussion of reels should be directed to one of the classic film lists. :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:02 PM
To: [
what
is your understanding of broadband, such that you came to this
conclusion?
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris LarsonSent:
Friday, November 17, 2000 11:22 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Broadband
Why is everyone ref
WARNING: The following is a bit heated.
YOU MAY WANT TO SKIP THIS ONE
R
A
N
T
A
N
D
R
A
V
E
OK. Steam coming out of ears. I've been trying to avoid comment on a number
of these kinds of questions, but this does it.
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO DO THE F*ING WORK, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YO
OTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000
12:48 PMTo: 'Chuck Larrieu'; Howard C. Berkowitz;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Free Book: Telecom &
Networking Glossary
Mind reels? Does that have anything to do with monkeys and the
Internet?
- Don
-Original Message- F
Dan, I am happy to see you are a kindred soul, who reads these books not
because they are required for certification, but because it makes you a
better engineer. My respects to you, sir!
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Daniel Cot
Note to myself: do not attempt to engage in public battles of wit. It will
serve only to reveal to all that I am totally disarmed :->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 1:48 P
Title: RE: Scripts for IOS upgrades
can
also use Cisco's router software loader. works more or less the same way. maybe
not quite as fast as the method DT suggests.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Taylor, DonSent:
Friday, Novemb
A number of comments, on line and off, have given me pause to think.
Whatever my personal situation, and the situations of certain others around
me, it is not right for me to vent on individuals, or on the list itself,
for whatever reason.
So, Mr. H. Pun, please accept my sincere apology for my
My Webster's Collegiate lists one meaning of "dampen" as "to check or
diminish the activity or vigor of". That same reference lists the word
"damping" as having one meaning of "to diminish the activity or intensity
of damping down the causes of inflation" and also "to check the vibration
or osc
PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Rumor Alert - Lab Changes - WAS: Flame bait.
Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>
>
> Rumor #3 - The CCIE Security will involve configuring Cisco security
> products on both Unix and NT boxes and doing VPN tunnels end to end,
meaning
>
Vaster than one might imagine. Check out
http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/icmp-parameters
there are ICMP message types, and many of those message types have further
information contained in "type codes"
e.g. and ICMP message type 3 ( destination unreachable ) can be further
clarifi
Hey, everyone, how you all been?
The short story is I did not make it to day 2. The rest of this is a bit
long winded, and easily skipped.
First of all, I was quite pleased to find upon reading through my Day 1
scenario that there was nothing I couldn't do, given time. There are plenty
of practi
Hint - during my review with the proctor after my recent failed attempt, the
proctor told me that in his opinion it was critical that one be familiar
with the configuration guides, and that one have practiced using the
configurations presented there.
Several folks who passed the lab first time th
Hh...
For distance vector, our choices are RIP, RIPv2, and IGRP, with EIGRP a
kinda
RIP uses 255.255.255.255 and 224.0.0.9 (on Cisco, anyway , if memory
serves )
RIPv2 uses the same multicast address that RIP uses.
IGRP uses 224.0.0.10, as does EIGRP ( if memory serves )
Routing proto
Priscilla, does the routing protocol itself deal at the MAC layer? Or is
that a function of the router hardware interface process? Well, I suppose
with IPX RIP they are one in the same
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscill
So in effect you are saying:
Inbound:
DENY anyone's incoming packets who has the SYN bit set but NOT SYN/ACK
ALLOW anything else at the moment ( inbound )
And outbound:
ALLOW ANYONE to communicate with the internet FROM inside. (nat'ed rfc1918)
Is this really what you want to do? Cuz inbound
So IS-IS does NOT comply with the OSI model? ;->
Seriously, Howard, when you say that IS-IS operates at the MAC layer, what
do you mean? When I do a debug isis adjacency on a Cisco router, is what I
am seeing ( is-is "hello" packets of various sorts, depending on the
configuration ) evidence of
Howard's comment brings to mind a problem my Design Engineer raised when
responding to a customer RFI.
Howard's comment: . (Pause for usual mystification on why someone wants
routing protocols to pass through
a firewall, a fairly frequent question).
The customer RFI stated requirement ( wording
Of
Charles Manafa
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Broadcast [7:132]
RIPv1 does not multicast...it only broadcasts.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/04/01 01:03
Subject: RE: Broadcast [7:132
Zero, if you miss all the questions or don't answer any of them :->
Ok. Sorry. Couldn't resist.
Passing score is 70
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael Bambic
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
My DE and I were practically rolling on the floor with this one.
Rule number one: the customer is always right.
Rule number two: when the customer's head is where the sun don't shine,
refer to rule number one. ;->
I agree with much of your assessment. Problem I have is that I work for a
telco,
s usually
around 700 something.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271]
Zero, if you miss all the questions or don't answer any of them
Oh I don't know. These days I'm finding it more difficult to tell the
difference between a fourteen year old and a forty year old. Male or female.
;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lou
Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 3
a fixed passing score but it is usually
around 700 something.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: What is minimum score for CCIE written? [7:271]
Zero, if you miss all the questions or
rks. So no automatic
failover in the design above.
So - now what?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Design Challoenge - a bit off top
The issue number is now up to around 7200. It seems to change daily :->
Some history.
Neighborhood October 4, 1999 number 5177 was issued
Neighborhood December 22, 1999 number 5444 was issued
Neighborhood May 28, 2000 number 5917 was issued
In other words, give or take a few, there are rough
I think you misunderstand the interface types with regards to a frame relay
switch.
There are three frame relay switch interface types - DCE, DTE, and NNI.
Check out
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/wan_c
/wcfrelay.htm
Down towards the end is a diagram you c
Broadcasts are not necessarily bad.
How do you suppose ARP works? Not to mention all the things that make life
under windows so enjoyable? Such as network browsing?
Do not be so hasty. Understand first.
How many servers? How many pc's? all on one flat network? No VLANs or
inter-vlan routing?
Once again, to clarify:
The interface with the DCE end of the cable is the interface that requires
the clock rate configured.
This may be different than the interface that has the frame-relay intf-type
DCE
Frame relay intf-type dce does NOT require clock rate and does NOT require
the DCE end of
Ever hear of the Atlantic cable? The Pacific cable? ;->
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Luke
Everett
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Check this one out . [7:537]
You idiot, did
When pvc's are reported "inactive" it means that you do not have end to end
connectivity.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Thomas
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 7:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Frame Relay swi
t to stick.
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The issue number is now up to
Before commenting on the specifics, in general let's look at what you are
trying to accomplish.
Youinternet?-network_1-network_2--destination
|VPN_tunnel---||--VPN_tunnel---|
tunnels are effectively point to point links. If I understand what you are
sa
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Thuan D. Ngo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:14 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Thomas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Frame Relay switching [7:435]
So What probably causes this problem? Can the crossover cable is one cause
Off topic a long ways, but you may want to check out " Angels Don't Play
This HAARP" or do some reading on the work of Nikola Tesla
Not that I believe any of it ;->
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Fr
Don't have time to look into this more deeply today. Try
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
c/bcprt2/bcdovnet.htm
CCO has several pages about virtual token-ring interfaces. They had
something else in mind apparently, when developing the concept. But it m
I'll bite, having nothing better to do tonight.
1) reload - the command is already in the config ;->
2) each IP what?
If you are intimating subnet mask, the ip header has no place for subnet
mask. A routing protocol packet would carry that information.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
Fro
Comments within:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Chandler
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:designing subnets with all ones/zeros.. [7:695]
I have two questions regarding using th
Ask any humpback whale
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Check this one out . [7:537]
If digital information can't be sent thro
Humpback whale, to be precise
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
ElephantChild
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Subject: Re: Check this one out . [7:608]
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Paul
I find most of CCO to be in that category ;->
-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 10:47 AM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Virtual Token Ring Interface [7:519]
Do they have a paper of "DUH
I've heard the same said of IPX. Which leads to the obvious question - is IP
any less chatty than any other protocol? At least with IPX there is no need
for ARP because the station address and the MAC address are one in the same.
I believe that the designers of Microsoft networking were cognizant
u mentioned that Windows is not rfc1812 compiant and that it allows wacky
subnets and disallows some valid subnets. Was that trial & error or has
microsoft documented this? I hate spending an hour looking for a document
that
is not there...
Thanks
DaveC
Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> Comments
As a matter of good practice, one should always use the no auto-summary on
all (E) IGRP and RIP networks, unless you have a very good reason not to.
As an aside, one should always use the "subnets" switch when redistributing
into OSPF. Hhmmm Upon reflection maybe this one is a bit more open
You can always put the quad zero route on all your routers, which solves the
problem as well.
Chuck
All your route are belong to us!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob
Vance
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
For a small fee, I can use NetFormX to run a couple of sample configurations
for you.
OR
You can check out
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/newConfig/config_root.pl
as a learning experience.
Chuck
Thinking may 3640 is overkill for a single frame connection, and that a 2610
might be more
On a more serious note, in this part of the woods, anyway, pricing for a
T3/DS3 frame relay becomes cost effective at around 8-10 T1 lines. Have you
checked with your telco about their pricing to you? Have you looked at ATM
or even ATM / IMA, with FRATM connecting your frame relay based locations?
Absolutely.
Following is a review I posted on the CCIE lab list after I took the class:
-
This past week I had the experience of participating in the Mentor
Technologies ECP1 class. Here is my report.
The course content should be pretty familiar to everyone here. It
Ah ah ah. You used a forbidden word in your message. I have edited it in my
reply so this message doesn't get locked away again.
Also, see what you miss by not being on the CCIE study list? ;->
Yes you get to keep your class case study book, with a bazillion labs in it.
Great for reminding yours
As a result of recent spam attacks, Paul Borghese has instituted software
which now segregates e-mail that contains certain forbidden language. Along
with some obvious choices, one of the these forbidden words is the readable
portion of xxx_brain_dump_xxx There have been a couple of messages tod
Hhm..
Are these hubs daisy chained?
Does the noticeable slowdown happen al the time, or can you isolate it to
particular times of day?
Do you have an internet connection?
Do you have anyone using any kind of dial up to an external service of some
kind?
Have people set up their own lit
Amen, brother!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Will
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: CCIE Written questions [7:1005]
1) The written test still covers all those topics.
2) I think th
Comment below:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of No
Data
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:CCIE Written questions [7:1005]
3. I've heard that studying for the Lab and the
Written at the sa
User name is easily found by looking at the default login screen on a
windoze device.
As for the password, it's no doubt easily found on one of the post-it's on
the edge of the monitor. ;->
I'm with Howard - exactly what does a layer two security feature accomplish
in real terms?
Chuck
-O
301 - 400 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
