Letterman
> Cisco Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michael L. Williams
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 7:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Multiple Super
When you have two Sups and you're running Native IOS, you cannot run HSRP
between them...as you mentioned, one sup is active and the other is standby
and there's about 90-120 seconds of downtime when one sup fails because the
other sup has to re-initialize the hardware (the standby sup (if you wat
We have two 3640s that we use for dial-up access very nice for that
purpose we have coming in to one of them 2 PRIs, then 48 MICA digital
modems... it rocks you can dial-in with ISDN BRI for ether 64 or
128Kbps (bonded) or handle analog dial-ins... The other has a single PRI
(only 18
I agree.
Mike W.
"David j" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, I agree but only if it's voluntary...
> Robert D. Cluett wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice to know where each member is located and what
> > there level
> > of knowledge/certification is. I wonder if
Actually, I though the LANE section of Caslow's book was pretty good.
Mike W.
"Neil Borne" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know where I get can get some "straight forward" LANE
> information?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP,C-voice
You would need to find the router that is acting as the default gateway for
the clients connected to said switch, then do a show arp there and match it
with the mac addresses you see attached to you switch.
The couple of arp entries you are seeing on the switch are the entries being
used by the s
There a 2500 series router (2511 I believe, but hopefully someone else will
pipe up and correct me) that has 8 serial ports and a 10baseT interface that
you should be able to pick up for alot cheaper than $1000. I've even
seen it referred to as "the poor man's term server".
Mike W.
"McA
In a sense the NT box is acting as a router... I think by default it
would only know the two networks that are attached (like a router would) but
you can add your own routes to an NT/2000/XP box, effectively you could use
it as a router that only understands static routes (although I think yo
Well there's some information missing. I see you only have 8 gig
ports, but where do VLANs come into play there? We need more
information.
Mike W.
"John Brandis" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> G'day all.
>
> Got a question regarding VLAN trunking i
I believe IS-IS is on the BSCI for the CCIP, but no on the BSCN for the
CCNP..
Mike W.
"Robert Cluett" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Did anyone find IS-IS on their exam? And if so, to what extent?
>
> Rob, CCNA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.
"Paul Borghese" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Futurewei (of whom I know nothing about) is not the only vendor copying
> the Cisco interface. Check out Avici (www.avici.com) or even the free
> software Zebra (www.zebra.org).
Wow I checked out the link to Avi
Well, AMD actually co-developed CPUs with Intel, so they would have no need
to copy. And (sorry Priscilla, this isn't meant for you), but when will
people get it through their head that Microsoft DID NOT COPY Apple. That
implies Apple was the first computer to use a mouse and GUI, which is
defin
EVERYTHING in China has ties to the government... it's called
communism..
Mike W.
"Peter van Oene" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> These guys actually are a major player in the asian market space. They
> apparently reverse engineer products and push them to market at very low
I have to say that 30-40% off of Cisco's *retail* prices isn't really that
great of a deal I'd just as soon buy the Cisco through my employer
and get their discount
Mike W.
"Ron Tan" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> In US the company is call Futurewei, you c
Regarding HSRP and EIGRP, I did a google search on "EIGRP site:huawei.com"
and the first page returned was no longer on Huawei's website, but you could
pull up the Google cached version, and it lists EIGRP as a supported
protocol. Other than that single reference, the only other reference to
EIGR
Here..
try this
pad
pad
pad
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/131/mppp-ddr.html
Mike W.
"Rainer Schuetz" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi there,
> we`ve got one Cisco 1603 with IOS 12.0 and we don`t know how to
> configure
> the router so that it uses mul
"John Neiberger" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I suppose it depends on the unit but ours mainly use unicast to the Cisco
> MCU. As far as I know they use standard H.323. The downside if you're
> using an MCU is that the PolyComm units have a lot of different co
Depends on the model, but usually you'll see traffic all into either
128Kbps, 384kbps, 768Kbps or 1.5Mbps We have a Polycom unit that has
ISDN and a LAN port, but if you telnet to it's IP on the LAN you get a
"status" page showing H.323 is disabled, so we can't use it on the LAN (at
least wit
That's exactly what he should do
"Winston Shaw" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Don,
>
> I think you could set up DHCP scopes on a server and use the "ip helper
> address" command to direct dhcp discover broadcasts from your clients. The
> router sho
Wha?!? What would that accomplish?
Mike W.
"Thomas Larus" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the
> port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port.
Message Posted at:
http://ww
I agree with the other post... if you don't want 1 and 5 to access each
other, then what's the point of having them in the same VLAN?
Mike W.
"Winston Shaw" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy.
> Try setting port secu
That 24Kbps would make sense as G.729 should compress the voice to 8Kbps for
a unidirectional voice signal, so 16Kbps for bi-directional 24Kbps
should be plenty for overhead and a bi-directional voice stream. However,
if you want you could use G.729b (or G.729ab if you happen to be using
med
We had a couple of routers that would randomly reboot, and after rebooting a
show ver showed "system restarted by bus error". I dug around on Cisco's
site and found a page that said many bus errors are memory errors. I traced
the address down to a stick of RAM, replaced it and was fine afterward
Are you paying for 14Mbps fractional DS3 or for full DS3 and want to limit
certain traffic to 14Mbps? If you want to limit out outgoing traffic, you
can shape it.. but if you want to limit the incoming traffic you need to
police it.. Here's a page talking about the older verison Committ
I don't think it's a limitation so much as a guideline. And this guideline
applies to the circuit, not the router hardware. There are other criteria
used to judge if the router needs to be beefed up, like looking at CPU load,
memory, etc.
Mike W.
"Jeffrey Reed" wrote in message
[EMAIL PRO
Comments inline.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If we run 10 or 100 Half Duplex to a switch ... Is there a chance of a
> collision occuring?
Yes, definitely. Anytime you run half-duplex there is a possibility of
collisions.
> If we then run 10 or 100 Full
Whenever using a hub, you're stuck @ half-duplex. But on any NIC or switch
that's wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You are wrong =) That is OLD stuff that won't do 10/full
>
> Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Kohli,
No. One or two sheets of paper (depending on the testing center) and a
pen/pencil and you have to turn in the paper when you're done.
Mike W.
"GEORGE" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do they allow the use of a calculator I the ccie written exam?
Message Pos
Tom,
I made a copy of the outline for the new R&S exam... but I think it's @
work... so I'll look for it there and forward it on to you.
Mike W.
"Tom Scott" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Michael L. Williams wrote:
&g
"Tom Scott" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> * Is there a new exam that will replace the R/S qualifying exam
>350-001? I heard it might be renumbered 351-001 but there are no
>references to 351-001 on cisco.com. Does anyone have information
>about this?
yes. yes I should... =)
Mike W.
"Chuck" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> shouldn't you be studying and optimizing your alias exec list? ;->
>
>
> ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I can't see there would
Dain just posted this site a few days ago right up your alley.
pad
pad
pad
http://www.learntosubnet.com/
Mike W.
"GEORGE" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone have some cool or useful links to calculate subnetting
> including broadcast .
Mess
"Bob Timmons" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Secondly, regarding Carl's post, would the answer be 14? I'm not sure the
> subnet-zero comes into play with CIDR. I was under the impression it was
> only relevant to subnetting as opposed to summarizing. Does anyon
charts and bitswapping charts instead of taking an hour and learning how
binary actually works... geez)
Mike W.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Hoang
To: Michael L. Williams ;
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
> I would say 8
I would say 16 as well.
Mike W.
"Dain Deutschman" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
>
> Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure route
> summarization. How many cla
True you can, but turning off console logging is treating the symptom of the
problem, not fixing the problem itself.
Gaz is correct. Use 'no service config' in global config mode to make it
so the router doesn't attempt to load a config from TFTP.
Mike W.
"YASSER ALY" wrote in message
[EMAIL
Your diagram is correct as far as connections go. Most of the Novell
servers are connected to the 5513, but all are in VLAN 1. The 5513 RSM does
all IPX routing for all VLANs. All VLANs are trunked between all switches.
There aren't any IPX routes on either of the 6509s as IPX routing isn't
ena
My previous post and this URL are strictly for permanent voip trunks between
PBXs.
Sorry... I meant to include an URL.. One thing I did NOT like about this
example tho, is that they are doing as I mentioned and configured a separate
DS0 group for every DS0 and therefore they end up with mult
Voice Gurus: I'm going to take a stab on this because I just went through
some of this myself (with 2610s but hey same deal)... feel free to point
out my mistakes
If you are doing an E&M trunk between the two PBXs (with the VoIP link
acting as the router), then the dialing information y
Wes,
Thanks for your reply. As you can imagine I've been through the ringer so
far with this one =)
We checked all of the trunks for native VLAN, speed, duplex, etc... All
checks out. This is also supported by the fact that IP works fine (all IP
routing for VLAN1 is handled by the RSM in
Huh? Why would you need VLAN trunking to utilize Etherchannel? They're two
independant technologies (that can be combined if you wish). We have
Etherchannel configured between many switches that aren't trunk links (i.e.
only carrying VLAN1). (and it would also be a pain to configure an
EtherCh
No... you don't. You can simply configure an Etherchanell that only carries
VLAN1 only if you want more than 1 VLAN on the switches to you need a
trunk.
Mike W.
"Kohli, Jaspreet" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do we need to setup trunks if we have default
Not if you agree to give it up (as you must if you want the certification).
=)
Mike W.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hummm. I am thinking the same thing.
> Knowing the amount of test questions is paramount to pacing yourself. I
> guess the only to be prep
Gotcha... I'll try it and see how it goes...
Mike W.
- Original Message -
From: R. Benjamin Kessler
To: 'Michael L. Williams' ;
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]
> Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the fo
Cool thanks for the info!
Mike W.
- Original Message -
From: Brigitte Schoots
To: Michael L. Williams ;
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:36 AM
Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]
> The RFC is 3021 ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3021.txt
>
> It is implemented on Cisc
Recently it seems that replies aren't being grouped together under a common
thread anymore (I checked the web forum and it's happening there as well
(See threads "Re: BGP synch question" and" Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal
Agreement--Cisco"), so I know it's not just Outlook Express)
I rem
I have successfully used both an "all-zeros" and an "all-ones" subnet on
Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine.
Mike W.
"Kazan, Naim" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support
> subnets 0-255.
I had heard that there was an RFC pertaining to using a /31 on
Point-to-Point links only (in which case there is no need for a
network/broadcast address). Has this been implemented in (Cisco) network
equipment yet? Is the RFC complete?
Anyone know? Priscilla? Howard?
Mike W.
"Gaz" wrote in
So it would appear that even saying how many questions, how much time, or
what a passing score is would now be considered a violation of the
NDA... whoa
". . . (including, without limitation, questions, answers, worksheets,
computations, drawings, diagrams, length and/or number of Exam se
Did you copy/paste that right out of a textbook? =) Before I even saw
anything indicating that you authored that post, I got about 1/2 way through
the paragraph and was thinking to myself "This had to be from
Priscilla".
Mike W.
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
If I'm not mistaken, one of the advantages of the 1200 series is that it's
modular so that you can utilize the 802.11a standard, then when 802.11g is
finalized you can just swap the module
Mike W.
"Dennis Laganiere" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Several pe
then erases their config. However I don't think
> you are going to find that many routers compared to unpatched IIS
> systems.
>
> Dan
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Michael L. Williams
> Sent: Monda
LOL. I posted the exact same link. gotta love Google =)
Mike W.
"Brian Backer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Kevin,
>
> Check out http://www2.adtran.com/support/technotes/t1ddsadptxvr/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i
ROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dude, you mis read. it's shares on attached networks, not on the
> routers :)
> B
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Michael L. Williams
> Sen
Yeah... you can make one pretty easily.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/dsl_prod/6015/6015hig/05inap
pc.htm
http://www2.adtran.com/support/technotes/t1ddsadptxvr/
HTH,
Mike W.
"Kevin Love" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey Team,
>
> I
He/She will take the newer version doesn't matter when you register. It
matters when you take it.
HTH,
Mike W.
"Shaheen Gagan" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Suppose someone registers with prometric to take the exam 350-001
> in August,and this exam retires
Shares? On Routers? Tell me more..
Mike W.
"Dan Penn" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, some forms of the Klez infects network shares.
>
> Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Gary Crouch
>
I received my score in the mail today.. I PASSED!!! I have *no* idea
how I slid by, but I got a 50 on it. (passing score was 45)
The beta was very difficult, so much so that I forked up the $300 and took
the current written a week or so later (and passed)... So I could look at
this as
"mlh" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi, Reg,
>
> thank you for your clarification. static routes are the local routing
> information, so won't be advertised.
Correct, unless you want them to and do a 'redisribute static' command
Mike W.
Message Posted
Are the scores starting to come in now? I still haven't received mine
yet... =(
Although, banking on the fact I would fail, I went ahead and took the
current written and passed, so I'm not too worried about the beta
results... just curious =)
Mike W.
"Semiglia Bodero" wrote in message
[EM
This isn't quite right. See comments below.
"Kim Graham" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This brings up a question. I understand that after the initial "hi I will
> be handling your requests please use me as your destination mac address".
> (Router talking to cl
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 12:17 AM 6/22/02, Tim Potier wrote:
> >Lets say I have HSRP configured on a series of routers... I know clients
are
> >sending packets to the MAC/IP of the well known "virtual MAC" with Cisco
> >equipment.
According to CCIE exam materials, the *only* time the serial will show
down/down is when there is NO serial cable or a bad serial cable connected.
So even if you have a misconfigured framing method, you should at least see
up/down.
Mike W.
"Bob Timmons" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">n
WOOHOO!! I've have been DYING for a site like this to FINALLY appear on the
internet!!!
Why do these lamers even bother to advertise their crap?!?!?
LOL!
Mike W.
"Farmgirl17085" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The BEST zoo site on the @net!
> Sex With Dogs
> H
Okay. perhaps I don't monitor my bundles as close are y'all do, but
we're running quite a few sites using multiple T1s bonded with MLPPP, and we
don't have any stability problems (as far as dropping traffic and EIGRP
neighbor changes, etc) that I'm aware of nrf, tell me more about what
to
Interesting you ask.. I've had a similar conversation and my thoughts
were always the same... (that each power of 10 was equated to 2^10 more than
the previous), but it seems to vary alot. I've found that with memory
(RAM), they stick to the hard core "binary metric" system where 1K always =
If you're running a dynamic routing protocol (i.e. RIP, IGRP, EIGRP, or
OSPF), they should see the two T1s as equal cost paths and automatically do
per-destination load balancing (if you're running CEF, then that can be
per-packet, at least with EIGRP, but I would suspect the same no matter now
th
Actually, if you're running Native IOS on your 6500s (which many HUGE
corporations are now doing because of how redundancy is handled and besides
it's like having a 280+port router =), then there is really a minimal
differents in the 6500 and 3550 commands. They're both IOS, so no
diff..
As
"Frank Merrill" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Michael L. Williams wrote:
> >
> > Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s
> > and 3550s that
> > support power, but there's the
I don't think it matters how many are in a group. If they're not servicing
the same virtual IP, does it really matter what group they're in?
Just thinking out loud
Here's a good answer for ya =) Convert the 6509s to Native IOS, then
just run HSRP between the two active MSFCs done!
Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s and 3550s that
support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does provide
inline power. Can't they make up their mind as to whether they want to
do it or not?!?!?!
As far as the 3550 replacing the 5000, it says "However
I haven't heard anything yet either
Mike W.
"Clark Jason" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> All,
>
>
> Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took the exam
> months ago.no results yetjust wondering if anyone had gotten
> anything back
Are they using 6x00 switches in the lab? I thought they were still using
Cat5000s and therefore the CatOS and Set/Show/Clear commands. If that is
still the case, you wouldn't want to use a 3550 as it uses IOS (config t,
etc). I know the 6000s and 6500s you can use in Hybrid (CatOS) or Native
(I
IMHO, you should always force the speed and duplex on both the switch and
the end device. Autodetect can work find if both sides are set to
autodetect, but if one side is set to a particular duplex and speed and the
other is auto, you'll almost surely run into to problems (the least likely
proble
Although I've not used 'stacking' I've heard and read of it a small bit. It
seems it's makes multiple switches appear as a single switch as far as
managing the equipment. However, performance-wise, is there any gain to
'stacking' switches as opposed to simply interconnecting them. I'm not
aware
There are some online games where you can shoot stuff..
Get a copy of Quake 3 or any of those first person shooters. great way
to get it out =)
Mike W.
"Morgan Hansen" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> RGH!!!
>
> Im sorry, but is there anyone out t
No argument here =)
Mike W.
"nrf" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> With a nod to my colleague Michael L. Williams, I promise I will not turn
> this into another cert vs. experience royal rumble.
>
> But let me see if I got this
How can one save $50.00 on a product that only costs $40 to begin with?
Mike W.
"Kaminski, Shawn G" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> That was a fair enough flame. HOWEVER, :-) the reason Boson is used as the
> comparison is because people are cultified (is that a
"Chuck" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Someone who passed the lab recently advised me ( as have other folks who
> have posted their success here and elsewhere ) that it remains CRITICAL
that
> you spend as much time as possible reading the command references as fo
I think that's a pretty pessimistic outlook for cert... wow... if a book
coming out convinces you all of a sudden your cert will be "paper", .
wow...
I can't explain it, but that comment really bums me out... I can't
believe all of this talk about "paper" this and "paper" that.. g
"Brian Zeitz" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Comparing the CCIE to the CCNP, yes I agree that the CCIE is harder then
> the CCNP in both the routing and switching part. There are just more
> topics in the CCNP and CCNA, and not covered in as much detail as the
> C
Congrats!!!
"Kelly Cobean" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> All,
>I passed the CCIE written with a score of 84%. It's not the 90+ I
> wanted, but, in lieu of failing the exam, I'll take it :-). True to
Cisco's
> exams, it had some "difficult-ly worded" questi
NP is going towards a cornflakes cert (or
> maybe I just struck the easy BSCI questions).
>
> JMcL
> - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 30/05/2002 04:12 pm -
>
>
> "Michael L. Williams"
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 30/05/2002 01:28 pm
> Please
Although I love the WIC-1DSU-T1, it appears that it only supports up to 24
channels of 56/64Kbps per channel (T1) AFAIK, this WIC also doesn't
support ISDN.
Here's more info:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/t1duwny1.htm
HTH,
Mike W.
"Benjamin Pierce" wrote in message
[EMA
"Brian Zeitz" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It's like they pulled a few
> random topics from the CCIE (and CCNP) and made a cert out of it. I
> don't think many people are buying it.
I agree, but that wouldn't make the certification invalid as such. Take
CCNP f
Congrats!
"John Danner" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I came home today to find my score report for the routing beta I took in
> March in the mail.
> I passed with a 846.
>
> I hope all find their beta score reports soon!
>
> -John
Message Posted at:
http://
You? A Salesman? You had me fooled thinking you were a techie... =)
I knew someone would have the correct answer For some reason, I was
thinking that an FXO could only handle a single call like an FXS (just
didn't supply the dial-tone, etc) but now that I'm thinking back hard to
my
"Steven A. Ridder" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You can, but there haven't been any serious QOS techniques released yet in
> the AiroNet series products yet. The other problem is that the media
isn't
> switched, so it's basically a hub in the sky.
>
> It's a ru
Try a write erase before loading from TFTP
I'm *sure* someone will correct me if I'm wrong (hehe) but I remember
thinking that when you copy from TFTP or Flash to running config, it's the
same as if you typed the commands in yourself (whatever commands are in the
file), so when you copy from
That's a complete possibility =)
Wouldn't be the first time hehe
Mike W.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Perhaps your thinking is a bit off.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45319&t=45289
--
I can't speak for him, but I think he was "complaining" about (so to speak)
was that SNA and ATM were not on the outline (implying they were on the
exam).
Mike W.
"Kris Keen" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I sit this exam in a few weeks, you are saying I sho
I appreciate your information, Joseph. I guess my question was more toward
the types of interfaces that will run etherchannel. i.e. if you're knocking
the speed down on a FastEthernet interface to 10Mbps, it's still a
FastEthernet interface, not Ethernet interface.
One of the requirements for a
Do you have any documents or URLs that talk more about the etherchannel
(that allows you to use 10Mbps ethernet in a bundle).
I'm not saying I don't believe you, but twice today I've searched Cisco's
website to find info on it, and I can't find anything but references to
Fast- and Gig-Etherchanne
"nrf" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Aha. Here is the fundamental difference between you and me.
>
> The fact is, certifications are not really an effective foot-in-the-door,
> contrary to popular belief. Yeah yeah, would-be flamers, I just got your
> attention,
"nrf" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well, I don't know if it's a waste of time. Consider this. There might
be
> some newbie guys who were all gung-ho about grabbing a bunch of certs
> because they believed that by doing so they would just be handed a
> super-ki
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yeah Kris you are right. I lost about $120 on the CID and got angry.
> Because of this, I converted a $500,000 Cisco network into a $300,000
> Foundry network and my customer is really happy about it. ;-)I wasn't
> angry that I
"nrf" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The fact is, arrogance and insecurity cuts both ways. Both sides (the
> experienced guys and the inexperienced guys) are guilty from time to time.
> And it's bad no matter who's doing it.
Agreed 100%
Mike W.
Message Pos
you can do transparent bridging between Token Ring and Ethernet. It
requires a Translational Bridging..
See the following URL: (watch for wrap)
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/mmbridge.htm
Mike W.
"2504s" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTEC
"Tom Scott" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've seen a goodly number of network administrators who are in positions
of
> power, but
> who don't know even the basics of classful subnetting, VLSM, routing, L2
LAN
> switching,
> and VLANs. (Even some telco ATM techs
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Regarding the difference between a MAC table and CAM table: They are just
> different names for the same thing.
One small quibble (heheh. don't you expect this from me by now =)
Although they do essentia
1 - 100 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
