support CDP )
or the device or OS version is not supported by the version CW2K he has.
Regards,
Pete
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Systems and Network Consulting, Training, Web Hosting Services
Phone: 919-847-1740 or 866-701-2345
Web: http://www.emacolet.com
Need
I guess someday people will start asking me if these projects can be posted
to NMSUsers.org. :)
Regards,
Pete
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Systems and Network Consulting, Training, Web Hosting Services
Phone: 919-847-1740 or 866-701-2345
Web: http
At 08:42 AM 9/2/2003 +1200, Thomas Salmen wrote:
hmm, cheers
any idea if there is any documentation regarding this? seems to me that with
all these sites these days mucking around with df bits and filtering icmp
that it's a wonder that any link with an odd pmtu works at all. not to
mention qos
At 10:37 PM 8/31/2003 +, Thomas Salmen wrote:
does anyone know if using frame-mode mpls affects the mtu on an interface? i
can't help thinking that sticking in an extra 32-bit header would mean
reducing the amount of user data that could be carried by 32 bits - causing
fragmentation if the
It seems the earliest IOS release supporting Priority Queueing on the Cisco
828 is 12.2(8)T.
I found this using the Cisco feature navigator www.cisco.com/go/fn (requires
a Cisco login)
What IOS version are you using?
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I am
Marco
I have found very many errata in this book. Mostly they are easy to spot,
and there are few factual inaccuracies.
I have been through the whole book, noting errors as I have found them, but
I haven't had time to collate them yet.
Peter
Marco P. Rodrigues wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
in certmanager as a pass
about 3 months after I had given up waiting and passed the non beta version.
Thanks
Peter
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73599t=73599
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from
the new specialist certs)
Regards
Peter Walker
CC[NID]P, CISSP, CSS1, etc
(yeah, my current employer is a reseller)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73937t=73919
--
**Please support
have received results
for CCIE Beta qualification exams I took before and after the QOS and BGP
exams.
Peter
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73759t=73599
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from
I'm curious if anyone has talked to their SP and has thought about
leveraging MPLS carrier's carrier approach? Not sure how many
SPs, if any, support this currently, but seems to have the
right scaling properties if you're an ISP. And with the ability
for eBGP to carry labels for BGP routes
At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions for you:
1. How do you like it so far?
2. Did you migrate from something else? If so, how did the migration go?
3. Any 'gotchas' that you learned later that you wish you'd learned
trying to convince you to buy it?
inquiring minds need to know :-
John Neiberger wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter van Oene wrote:
At 04:31 PM 7/21/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
Are any of you using Qwest PRN? If so, I have a few questions
for you:
1. How do
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Systems and Network Consulting, Training, Web Hosting Services
Phone: 919-847-1740 or 866-701-2345
Web: http://www.emacolet.com
Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit
http://www.nmsusers.org
To have
At 12:29 AM 7/11/2003 +, wj chou wrote:
In this case, you L1 areas will not usually be the same and the L1
adjacency between the two core routers will not form. If the area is the
same, the L2 adjacency is superfluous. Many large networks are single
area, or single level (ie L1 everyone in one
At 03:40 AM 7/10/2003 +, wj chou wrote:
Hi..
a basic ISIS question...
I know that by default, an IS is L1-L2, so it can form a L1L2 adjacency with
its neighbors. But what's the benefit of it? and under what kind of
situation in real world people want to configure it this way?
L1L2 routers
7/10/2003 +, Peter van Oene wrote:
At 03:40 AM 7/10/2003 +, wj chou wrote:
Hi..
a basic ISIS question...
I know that by default, an IS is L1-L2, so it can form a L1L2 adjacency
with
its neighbors. But what's the benefit of it? and under what kind of
situation in real world people
At 08:51 AM 7/5/2003 +, H T wrote:
Hi,
Actually Cisco just says the following topics are removed, but there is not
details
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html
ISO CLNS... does it include ISIS ???
ISIS routing IP is still a valid topic.
Token Ring and Token
At 03:15 AM 1/5/2003 +, RamG wrote:
Hello Group,
I finished NP/DA in Oct 2000. Since then, I have been looking for job in
networking. I know my drawback for being unsuccessful. It is my past
experience {as Accountant} and real world experience with Cisco routers. In
order to get some
check the blue print on CCO.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71218t=71132
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
a fairly up to date boot helper image as the boot helper is actually
quite helpfull if there are problems loading your main ios image.
Regards
Peter
--On 23 June 2003 23:30 + Lee wrote:
Hello Group,
I want to beef up my 4500M+ to 16MB Flash so I can run 12.2 code
[JN] Yeah, but does the college happy HR dude (your idol) who
says
bachelors required on dinky IT jobs (e.g. desktop support
tech) pay
attention to that? As far as he's concerned all BSs are BSs,
and they are
all superior to non-graduates. Remember that we are talking
about IT
At 09:34 PM 6/8/2003 +, garrett allen wrote:
the intent of this list is to discuss preparation cisco exams, not
opportunities in the various job markets. if your comments don't
relate to the study blueprint in some meaninful way, please keep them
to yourself.
nice thread :-) for those
You should do bit-swapping because the routers will speak in non-canonical
addressing.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70164t=70154
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
you could try to configure area 1 range command at the abr, R2.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70041t=69969
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
To match the even subnets, use
access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.254.255
To match the odd subnets, use
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.254.255
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70040t=70039
--
FAQ, list
Kevin
Actually you have to attempt the lab within 18 months of completing the
qualification exam.
If you fail you mustnt leave a a gap of more than twelve months between lab
attempts and must pass the lab within three years of the qualification exam
pass.
Peter
--On 01 June 2003 02:35
At 05:24 PM 5/29/2003 +, Kazan, Naim wrote:
Howard,
I would appreciate your view and the group on which one you guys would
prefer, Tag switching or Multicasting. We having been running into problems
with doing multiple windows XP imaging that can only handle up to 8
computers at a time.
At 07:52 AM 5/29/2003 +, B Rudy wrote:
Hey guys, I just got an offer to become a 2nd senior network engineer for
this company in Orange Country. Great News i know!!
Dilemma: I am a CCNP but have no local Area Nework Experience. Going to be
workin with Catalyst 6500 switches. Also i have
At 12:02 PM 5/28/2003 +, Rohit Sundriyal wrote:
Hi All
I am facing very Strange Problem .My lan is behind Pix and for the last few
weeks i am receiving some popup messages on my lan pc from internet even
thought i am not browsing any site.Can anybudy tell how to block this kinda
messages on
thanks guys
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69599t=69565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 03:05 PM 5/27/2003 +, Nuurul Basar wrote:
I am planning to configured both my core and distributions as L3 device, and
let the access switch to distribution using L2.
I was advice that by doing this on my network two identical ip address on
same subnet/vlan but in a different access switch
, but failing to understand what
it is you are trying to do :-)
Pete
- Original Message -
From: Peter van Oene
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576]
At 03:05 PM 5/27/2003 +, Nuurul Basar wrote:
I am planning to configured both
At 01:53 AM 4/6/2003 +, Bullwinkle wrote:
In other words, for purposes of testing, there are ONLY two ways to remove
things from the AS_PATH. 1) the technique you describe, which is to create
Both these techniques are invalid in my opinion. If you create a new
route, you haven't changed the
At 04:22 PM 4/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
150.50.200.0(R1)(R2)--(R3).
R1 belongs to AS1
R2 belongs to AS2
R3 belongs to AS3
I inject 150.50.200.0 using the network command on R1 and see 150.50.200.0
in R3 with as_path of 2 1.
The question is how can I remove the 1 from the As Path on R3.
At 08:26 PM 4/5/2003 +, Salvatore De Luca wrote:
I have to agree that it is a bit silly, dangerous, and should not be done on
a production enviornment.. but so are a lot of scenarios on the CCIE Lab..
Just to add to the sillyness:
Because it is silly and dangerous, you also can't do it
At 03:46 PM 4/5/2003 +, Salvatore De Luca wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to better understand a particular BGP scenario, thought
someone might shed some light. This is probably very simple, i am just
missing the punchline. If you have 2 routers, one let's say running in AS100
the other
This has always been one of my favorites.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0130661023/qid=1049475026/sr=2-2/ref=sr_2_2/002-6465627-7277631
(Computer Networks by Andrew Tannenbaum)
Pete
At 03:20 PM 4/4/2003 +, Hubert Pun wrote:
Hi,
Is there any good book for non-technical manager
According to my experience you have got it the wrong way round.
Cisco IOS will do NAT until the pool runs out, then do PAT on the last IP.
This was a major issue when then documentation suggested the opposite. Not
sure if this is still the case though.
Peter
--On 03 April 2003 07:50
SEE BELOW. I have a router with a loopback address
This address is being used by Serial0/0.1 and Serial0/0.3.
Is this a legal use of loopback addressing - or would it lead to ip
duplicate conflicts within routing processes. (The ARP table shows no
entries when these i/faces are pinged).
Is this
At 03:27 AM 4/2/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
I wonder if Cisco's MPLS class is just dated. It takes a long time to
develop and roll out a new class, especially if there's also a Cisco Press
book, exam, instructor materials, course binder, instructor training, beta
testing, etc.
More
Just study both and go easy on the incitement of textual riots.
At 10:15 AM 4/2/2003 +, you wrote:
Hopefully I'm not going to stir another whirpool here.
Today I was surfing job sites and found out that where there are less than
dozen jobs available for CCIE in Silicon valley, there are more
exam).
Peter Walker
CCNP, CCIP, CCDP, etc
--On 31 March 2003 13:00 + DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
wrote:
Since I just recently passed my CCNA I thought I would continue on up the
ladder. In looking at the CCNP I see there are 2 ways to get it.
1. Take the BSCI 640-901, Switching 640
At 05:27 PM 3/31/2003 +, Link Teo wrote:
I am using leased line to connect my remote offices to HQ. All the leased
line are backup by ISDN. Is there any tools which can inform me via email or
other means about whether I am using leased line now or ISDN backup? In
other words, any tools which
At 04:52 PM 3/31/2003 +, \\[EMAIL PROTECTED]\
wrote:
All,
Please can someone clear this up for me, if you have the time.
IBGP peers do not have to be physically connected to one another, as long as
an IGP (most preferably) is running between them.
In most cases the routers are not adjacent
Of course. Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66372t=66242
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
OK If I use the loopback addr then I can see ext trace going right way.
Now I need to make the rtr use this addr as the source
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66237t=66155
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I can reach my end node by declaring the loopback address as the source. By
default the router is using the seril i/f address. Unless I use the loopback
as the source it dont work. So I need to understand how to fix this - I
imagine the intervening hops are where the trouble lies
Message Posted
At 09:58 AM 3/26/2003 +, Larry Letterman wrote:
The serial interface cant ping itself like the ethernet can..It will send
the
packet to the remote end and then back..if the path between both serial
interfaces is not correct the local ping will
fail..turn off keepalives and see if the ping will
When I traceroute or ping to a remote node from Router A - no reply. If so
an extended traceroute or ping using the source's loopback address - hey
presto- all works fine. So how do I get the route to use its loopback
address as the source - rather than the serial interface. Or cant I change
this?
At 02:08 PM 3/26/2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don4t think so.
There are many QoS tool that you can use without MPLS.
For what it's worth, MPLS is not a QOS tool. It can be used as a component
in a QOS strategy, but by itself, provides no QOS.
For example, you can use ip rtp
At 12:55 PM 3/26/2003 +, Peter P wrote:
I can reach my end node by declaring the loopback address as the source. By
default the router is using the seril i/f address. Unless I use the loopback
as the source it dont work. So I need to understand how to fix this - I
imagine the intervening hops
I can ping from router A through various hops to router F.
Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path
back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A.
As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows the path back from F to A
- how come it doesnt
At 02:55 PM 3/25/2003 +, Peter P wrote:
I can ping from router A through various hops to router F.
Therefore the packet'knows' how to reach F - and also how to find a path
back to A by reply. However from router F I cannot ping router A.
As the ping works in the first case - ie it knows
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables
thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks.
The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using
different sets of
At 04:35 PM 3/25/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Orlando Palomar Jr CCIE#11206 wrote:
You have a routing problem. Check your routing tables
thouroughly. I'm sure you're missing some networks.
The reason you're able to ping one-way is because you're using
different sets of
At 08:25 PM 3/24/2003 +, Xy Hien Le wrote:
Hi everyone,
Can someone tell me that only ABR will ORIGINATE type 4 LSA in OSPF or both
ABR and ASBR do?
Only ABRs originate type 4 summaries.
Pete
Thanks
Xy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66094t=66089
Are you sure the communities are on the routes when they hit UU/Sprint? I
expect you remembered to add send-community to the peer :)
Pete
At 04:26 PM 3/22/2003 +, Cisco Nuts wrote:
Hello,
I have 2 routers in AS300
RTF is connected to RTA in AS 1239
RTG is connected to RTH in AS 701
In
Question: Should AS7018 on receiving the communites from AS1239 and AS701
set the desired local pref??
Why not??
What am I missing?
Please advise.
My read on it ( after checking Halabi's and Stewart's books ) is that
LOCAL_PREF is typically set on the inbound side, not with the
reading your question right it basically comes down to putting in
some deny statements into your NAT access-list that match your crypto map.
Regards
Peter
--On 19 March 2003 22:18 + Chris Penrose wrote:
Hi all, Can anyone help me with a problem I am having trying to create a
VPN
bk
The answers you are looking for are in the PIX 501 datasheet at
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/fw/sqfw500/prodlit/px501_ds.pdf
(watch out for line wrap), in the section Performance Summary
Peter
--On 19 March 2003 22:24 + bk wrote:
Good day,
I thought I read somewhere
At 07:31 PM 3/18/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Maccubbin, Duncan wrote:
How is the industry supposed to keep up with this??
What's the issue? Not sure I'm seeing your point. What's wrong with Cisco
announcing that their product received some sort of certificaton?
Exactly.. I think
At 02:25 PM 3/17/2003 +, Michael wrote:
Dear all
Can anybody suggest a stable vesion that supports
MPLS?
Try your SE team. It's all a balance of
platforms/features/interfaces/VIPs/PA's etc :)
We are in a process of running MPLS though our network
on C7507 routers and we tried a few
At 05:30 PM 3/15/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
With the announcement of the CCIE Voice certification ( a Good Thing, IMHO )
I wonder a couple of things:
1) who will be the first quadruple CCIE?
A certification junkie ;-)
2) Does Cisco still recognize the Design, WAN, and IBM
At 04:45 PM 3/13/2003 +, Shawn Xu wrote:
I am holding CCNP certificate. Recently I am interested in teaching Cisco
router and switch stuff. Do I need any Cisco teaching certificate?
That depends on what you want to teach. If you want to teach licensed
Cisco material, then I'd consult with
At 11:08 AM 3/14/2003 +, Amar KHELIFI wrote:
ur right about the frames ability to use gig0/2 only if the gig0/1 goes
down, but according to the standard, the link from which bpdu's arrive with
a higher cost will be put on blocking, but visibely that is not the case.
some one will surelly
At 03:00 PM 3/14/2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is generally a bad idea to run any IGP with your ISP. If your intent is
to advertise the external interface that you connect to your ISP to your
OSPF network, then run that interface under OSPF as passive.
I don't think any sane ISP would
At 05:57 PM 3/14/2003 +, Scott Roberts wrote:
In the end, the device either routes or bridges the frames it
receives, but takes no action that can be distinctly described as layer
three switching.
Pete
to my basic understanding ALL routing has a switching component to it
already,
At 01:43 AM 3/13/2003 +, aletoledo wrote:
a layer three switch is a router, just as a switch is really a bridge. a
layer 3 switch 'routes' in hardware, while a router routes in software.
For what its worth, Juniper would likely take exception to your calling
their products layer three
At 10:44 PM 3/12/2003 +, Orlando, Jr. Palomar wrote:
Without consulting any documentation, a couple of reasons I could think of
is forwarding rate and the switch-fabric (or the size of the backplane,
usually in Gbps). A full-fledged Layer-3 switch running at wire-speed
would be much more
At 07:39 PM 3/11/2003 +, Oliver Hensel wrote:
Hi!
Can someone point me to a document which explains
what happens with a prefix that is dampened if
it's distributed via two providers.
Hi Oliver,
Here is a link to a doc from Randy Bush that covers damping in some detail.
At 03:54 PM 3/13/2003 +, Chris Headings wrote:
Good morning all,
Does anyone out there know of either a good white paper or book that shows
some ISP OSPF designed networks? I am trying to find something that is more
geared towards service providers rather than corporate network LAN design.
At 12:16 PM 3/13/2003 -0500, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 2:43 PM + 3/13/03, Peter van Oene wrote:
At 10:44 PM 3/12/2003 +, Orlando, Jr. Palomar wrote:
Without consulting any documentation, a couple of reasons I could think of
is forwarding rate and the switch-fabric (or the size
At 01:36 PM 3/12/2003 +, Amar KHELIFI wrote:
sorry i don't agree.
check the bandwidth calculator on the net, u will see that i was correct.
+ for the K and k and B and b, it is so obvious that an explanation is not
necessary...
While I agree that Kb tends to refer to 1024 and kb to
At 02:16 PM 3/10/2003 +, Steven Aiello wrote:
Sorry for such a newbe question. But what is MPLS? And what is it?
Any one have a link they can point me too? Just trying to learn more.
I would recommend you start at www.mplsrc.com and possibly surf to the
standards page. Within that page,
Hi all,
Here is a quick post from Dave Katz on ISIS vs OSPF in large networks
dealing with the issue of which protocol inherently scales better. This is
from a thread in the IETF OSPF WG mailing list for those looking for the
full thread. Dave has participated significantly in the
At 11:11 AM 3/8/2003 +, omar wrote:
Hello ,
I am working as a freelance and i would like to be an Instructor (Cisco) .
Did anybody know the cursus?
I believe you still need to work for an authorized Cisco training partner
assuming you are looking for the CCSI designation.
best regards
omar
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though. A
hello mechanism and adjacencies does not a link state one make.
Message Posted at:
At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though
: Re: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
Peter van Oene wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count
At 09:05 PM 3/7/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
I'm at the early stages of considering migrating away from a
point-to-point frame relay network to a layer 3 MPLS-based private
network and I have a couple of questions based on some preliminary
verbal information.
I was told that no router
At 09:30 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching? ;-
I'm working on a draft for ARP switching. Still struggling with
At 08:31 AM 3/6/2003 +, Mike Flanagan wrote:
I have a question on different methods of BGP aggregation. Lets say
for instance that I had 4 /24 that I wanted to aggregate to a /22.
I am getting these /24's through EBGP and want to summarize them to
my IBGP peer withought using any aggregate
Just as an FYI I received the following in an answer to a question I sent
to cisco. It goes a bit off topic from the original question but it didnt
really make sense to just paste in the mention of QOS.
=
I will try to explain the rational for CS IP Telephony and how it relates
to CCIE
You should be able to get 2500 flash from ebay and many cisco / memory
resellers.
The company I used to use was http://www.memoryx.net (mainly bacuase they
were just down the road from where I worked and I could place same day
collection orders.
Peter
--On 06 March 2003 14:29 + [EMAIL
Timur
You may want to look at Heinz Ulm's boot camps ( http://www.heinzulm.com ).
I dont have any experience of the classes myself but I have heard good
things on the net.
Peter
--On 04 March 2003 19:09 + Mirza, Timur
wrote:
a hands-on lab training course for the ccie lab exam...i
Thats a lot better than the $900 USD I paid last year a month before Cisco
announced that token ring wasnt going to be in the lab any more. Gr :-(
--On 04 March 2003 03:50 + Steve wrote:
i got a 3920 for 120 usd. i know its cheap..yes it works
steve
The Long and Winding Road
are using a PSTN line instead of a telephone then replace FXS with
FXO
If you are buying used from auction sites such as Ebay then eg2 will work
probably out to be a lot cheaper option and just as capable as the 2600
router (in terms of voice, basic routing).
Regards
Peter Walker
CC
At 12:19 PM 3/2/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Group, Would u kindly guide me which RFC to read to understand
properly the behaviour of different ATM types of service ( vbr-nrt, cbr,
abr, ... ) Best Regards
The ATM forum is your best bet here. Here is a relevant link.
traffic shaping methodology. However we want to have this scheduled
by some sort of timer. I cant think of an IOS based way of doing this but
are there any apps or add-ons (Cisco works ?) that could handle the timing
side of this problem ?
Thanks in advance.
Peter
Message Posted at:
http
A
And that's exactly what would happen if you did the inter-VLAN routing on a
router too, using subinterfaces for each VLAN/ IP subnet. :-)
And, if it were a high-end router, it could do this at wire speed and would
have a RIB and FIB, just like someone else described for the 6500. The 7500
At 11:05 AM 2/25/2003 +, Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
In a Core-Distribution-Access Layer design, would you keep the Core L2 or
with high end L2/L3 switches such as the Cat6500 do you think it would be
better to do L3 in the core ?
I personally haven't found the need to have a Distribution
At 03:54 PM 2/25/2003 +, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Bridging is a layer two function,
Peter Walker
--On 25 February 2003 17:13 + Don Kanicki wrote:
I have 4 2500 series routers and not a one of them has a pcmcia slot on
it.I know the 16xx routers use pcmcia falsh cards but I have yet to see a
2500 with a pcmcia slot.
HTH
Don K.
Message Posted
access aggregation,
packet processing and performance all at the same time, and your port costs
are comparable per mbps, I'm not sure why you'd buy a distribution layer
other than to help a rep hit his number for the quarter.
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
At 04:46 PM 2/25/2003 +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2
At 06:03 PM 2/25/2003 +, Ellis, Andrew wrote:
According to Cisco:
Layer 3 switching refers to a class of high-performance switch routers
optimized for the campus LAN or intranet, providing wirespeed Ethernet
routing and switching services.
Compared to other routers, Layer 3 switch routers
said.
In any case, your individual milage may vary.
Peter Walker
CISSP, CC[DNI]P, CSS1, etc
--On 25 February 2003 21:37 + John Neiberger
wrote:
I am curious why ciscopress.com lists Priscilla's book under the CCDA
certification when I see so many comments that it is one
At 11:17 PM 2/25/2003 +, you wrote:
Peter,
The current rumour for the Academy CCNP program is that Cisco is dropping
the 3 layer model and moving to a 2 layer model with L3 in the core for
the BCMS course. I guess I'll find out for certain at Networkers in
Orlando, Fla. this June
You could try looking for a tool called
Just For Fun Network monitoring (or something like that).
I came accross it a week or two back and thought it looked quite good. I
think it may have been on sourceforge.
Regards
Peter
--On 21 February 2003 22:32 + Kevin Banifaz
Does anyone have or know of a site with a network protocol map / chart (that
I can print out). I am after a kind of wall chart that shows where protocols
fit within 7 layer OSI model. I do not want to have pay anything,
preferabbly. (Thanks in advance).
Message Posted at:
1 - 100 of 920 matches
Mail list logo
