[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a customer that has a small office with a Cisco 56K
Frame router. They
are running Nat. Now when I plug in the frame side the ethernet
side gets
constant request for translation then it gets to the point
where you can no
longer even ping the ethernet side.
Tim Champion wrote:
All the info relating to this book is good and I'm going to buy
on the back
of these reviews but... what makes people write switching
related poems?
Because if we don't laugh at ourselves then we have to cry! :-) You should
have heard the explanations of a brouter
Reimer, Fred wrote:
I've always liked hex myself. A hex mask of FF.FF.F8.00 can be
written as
F800 and still mean the same thing. You obviously can't do
that with
255.255.128.0 (255.255.128.0 != 2,552,551,280). While binary
works the same
way as hex in this manner, it is much to
Steven Aiello wrote:
Hello all,
I need some folks with hopefully a CCIE to answer this
question.
If there is an un subnetted class A, and there are 25 or users
on the
network. would the fact that the network is unsubnetted cause
a large
load of network traffic?
here is the
M.C. van den Bovenkamp wrote:
Elijah Savage wrote:
I have actually been told by TAC before IP Input, for what it
is worth
:)
Not much, anymore :-). It's been a *long* time (IOS 10.x?)
since access
lists were process switched, and thus would show up as extra
time spent
in 'IP
. And there are enhancements to
it now like 802.1s (multiple spanning trees) and 802.1w (rapid spanning tree
protocol).
Good luck!
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Nakul Malik wrote:
Hi all,
I started off studying routing and found it to be a topic that
interested me
a lot. I just couldn't get enough of halabi Doyle
Reimer, Fred wrote:
No offense, but this is CCNA material.
Do they still teach classful for CCNA, though? Perhaps the only thing that's
hard for him is that 192.168.24.0 has a mask of 255.255.255.0 in a classful
system. Moving the prefix over to the left of that classful boundary isn't
of dollars, eh?
Priscilla
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy
Cunctando restituit rem
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Get a copy of Cisco LAN Switching by Kennedy Clark and Kevin
Hamilton. It's
right up there with Doyle
to this
message. If
you are not the named recipient, you are not authorized to
use,
disclose, distribute, copy,
print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from
your
computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
, move your analyzer to different parts of the
internetwork or work with a partner who can place an analyzer on the
opposite side of the internetwork where you are working.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Thanks all,
Steve
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74998t=74987
Maybe a dumb question, but I know you guys can help me. :-)
How would I know if a router is using excessive CPU on IP access lists?
What am I looking for when I do a show processes cpu?
Thanks,
Priscilla
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75002t=75002
posted on what you find out. Thanks.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
My approach was to optimize at every
layer
possible. Choosing 802.3x feature was just one thing among
others I did to
speed up file access.
1) I moved them from a bus architecture, to a switched
architecture,
replacing all
It sounds like the Netgear Layer 2 802.3 flow control is buggy. It sounds
like you can't turn it off, though, because it's not a managed switch.
Should have bought Cisco!? :-)
You can turn it off on the workstations, though, and I would somewhat
hesitantly recomment that. You might risk other
Aspiring Cisco Gurl wrote:
Do these lab companions have specific labs for study or does it
only work off of the Network Academy books? Basically, what I
am asking is if they can be used separately with my own home
lab versus do I need to get the whole package of Network
Academy companion
lazy mentor wrote:
I've seen where people load balanced two T1's on a per packet
basis and achieved 1.5 megs on both circuits. Which would give
them a total of 3Megs, but the provider said that they are load
balancing 1.5 megs over two T1's. I asked different person same
provider, that if
Eric W wrote:
All I am still fairly new with ACL's. However I m interested in
blocking ICMP to my network behind router A (Interface e0/1 = my
network). But when a icmp request is issued from the outside
the router
replys with packet filtered from (interface e0/0 = outside
network) ACL
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Eric W wrote:
Priscilla please forgive me for my lack of vocabulary in this
issue.
But yes I am try to make the router silent.
Inter e0/0 (Outside) 192.168.1.20/24
Inter ee0/1 (Inside) 192.168.10.0/24
Ping from outside to (192.168.10.0/24
Eric W wrote:
Priscilla please forgive me for my lack of vocabulary in this
issue.
But yes I am try to make the router silent.
Inter e0/0 (Outside) 192.168.1.20/24
Inter ee0/1 (Inside) 192.168.10.0/24
Ping from outside to (192.168.10.0/24) produces from e0/0(reply
from
192.168.1.20
Magdy Ibrahim wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering If I can find any help here regarding this case
but I am
trying as I knew that most of the list members are involved in
Networking
and communications
Ok, Now I am trying to build CCNP LAB here for studying
purposes in Cairo
University,
Reimer, Fred wrote:
Structured
Unstructured
Internal
External
What is a structured versus unstrucuted security threat?
There sure are a lot of unstructured ones going on right now. Anyone else
seeing a huge increase in pings? I guess it's the welchia virus. It's
getting ugly. And the
Thomas Larus wrote:
The big difference, for me anyway, is that it is a lot easier
to find
answers to technical questions about the equipment on Cisco's
website.
Cisco's website is voluminous and easy to search.
I agree that Cisco's website is voluminous. It's full of well-written,
helpful
with system
memory or processing in the device to which the FRMR is sent. The FRMR could
also be the result of an error in the station sending the FRMR.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Many thx indeed
For more information
to implement and enforce though.
Priscilla
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how does firewall switch port block Blaster
[7:74092]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:04:49 GMT
Richard Campbell wrote:
Hi.. My friends told me
Johan Bornman wrote:
Is there a utility/software available to sniff wireless
communication to
confirm for instance that the 128bit encryption is doing what
it suppose to
do?
Is it WEP? Then it is not likely doing what it is supposed to do. With a
tool such as AirSnort or Kismet and enough
are not
the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute,
copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from
your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 1:22
to TCP port 135 failed.
Unbelieveably, huge (and I mean huge) numbers of windows machines were not
protected with a global or personal firewall! Shame on us.
Sounds like you're protected. A properly configured PIX, which you seem to
have, should protect you.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Message
Marco P. Rodrigues wrote:
Errata: CCIE(TM): Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert Study
Guide, Second Edition
By Rob Payne; Kevin Manweiler
If someone is reading this book can they confirm some
inconsistencies
I've come across while reading the book. I'm currently on
Chapter 7
and I've
Uh, what is dry copper? Is it analogous to dark fiber?
Thanks
Priscilla
Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorte wrote:
Dain Deutschman wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
Does anyone know if Cisco makes a product similar to the
Pairgain Campus
HRS
or Celsian G250 LAN
Just wondering, is this new LOVSAN msblast worm as big as it seems to be?
I've been helping lots of Windows users clean up their machines. They all
had the worm. These are mostly home users. I can't believe they would use
broadband, always-on access and not have a firewall, but they didn't!
What
, disclose, distribute,
copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from
your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wireless security and VPN
described.
I suspect there's more to this story and that some advanced, convoluted
features related to load balancing, clustering, redundancy, VLANs, etc. have
done what advanced, convoluted features tend to do: get mucked up. :-)
Please tell us more if you can. Thanks.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Pat
support a better method these days.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73926t=73908
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list
For a large campus network that has a need for wireless access in conference
rooms, cafeterias, etc., would it be overkill to require wireless clients to
use VPN IPSec software to access the campus network? This is for a customer
who is paranoid about security and understands the tradeoff of
Steven Aiello wrote:
Ok,
I haven't gotten much of a bit on my access list question.
But no
worries I have a book and I'm going to try it my self. However
can any
on give me a list run down of the ports needed for a VPN?
I didn't see your first message so I don't know what you're
Use a Mac. :-)
Priscilla
Duy Nguyen wrote:
He's able to see the c:\ on the laptop so its not physical.
Reboot.
refresh cache
- Original Message -
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: CCNP MCSE hands on [7:73284]
Are you
One other more useful comment. :-) Does the client or server have personal
firewall software running? It could be blocking the NetBIOS ports, which
would be a good thing (and probably the default) since they are infamous
targets for script kiddies.
Priscilla
Duy Nguyen wrote:
He's able
Fathalla Ahmed wrote:
Hi,
Any body knows if IPX and AppleTalk are included in the new
CCDA exam?
Although I haven't taken the test, I do have a copy of the course, and
there's no IPX or AppleTalk.
Good luck with it.
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Regards
Ismail Al-Shelh wrote:
Greeting,
in one of groups.google threads I noticed this equation
Util 10 MB Ethernet = ((InOctets/sec +
OutOctets/sec)*8)/1000
I am wondering where can I find a document which can explain
how to
calculate the utilized bandwidth. still I do not know
Richard Mangru wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody had any suggestions on study
material for the
606-606 Support exam?
Thanks
Richard
I have a few 640-606 study materials (inluding a practice exam) at my Web
site here:
http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
Good luck!
Packets for a given source-destination pair are a subset of packets for a
given destination. It's true that with per-destination load balancing, all
packets for a destination go out the same interface. Thus, it is true that
all packets for a given source-destination pair go out the same interface.
Ricardo J Castaneda wrote:
Hello,
A question barely came up to mind: Would it be possible to
join a broadcast domain, not by means of a LAN switch but
from one remote router to another, using GRE Tunnels?
Why not just disable routing and enable bridging? That would be easier. :-)
I hear you Chuck. I think microsegmentation (that's what we used to call it,
as you know I'm sure) was definitely oversold by the marketing types.
Microsegmentation to a point certainly makes sense. I troubleshooted quite a
few shared Ethernet networks that were approaching meltdown because of too
Quick addendum:
As Howard mentioned, the problem with a contention medium isn't only how
much bandwidth is available but also how quickly a station can access it. If
the stataion listens before it sends and can't send for long periods of time
because the medium is not free, this is bad news for
Alas, are we going to see the demise of trace-route as a useful
troubleshooting and performance tracking tool? Probably would make sense. It
sure makes it easy to find router addresses! :-)
Good to have you back, Chuck. I hope the road is treating you well.
Priscilla
Chuck Whose Road is Ever
I think this would work, but why would you want to do it? Why not make those
two parts of Area 5 different areas? Simply from a documenation and human
communication point of view, you don't want the design to be confusing. When
someone refers to Area 5, you don't want someone else to have to say
alaerte Vidali wrote:
Thanks.
The addresses are contiguous.
Suppose a network with many ABRs, one in each city. Any big
city represents small cities. Could you use an area for each
ABR? (I am wondering if there is no limit in the number of
areas. I bet not).
Yes, you should use an
Oscar wrote:
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
Packet
lots and lots of IOS versions are affected
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml
Thanks for the link. It's scary. Of course, with the proper ACLs, a router
wouldn't be
Black Jack wrote:
So I guess it's now 1,000,001 times :-)) Still, I don't blame
anyone for believing this urban legend of the networking world
when authorities such as Doyle and Caslow continue to propagate
it. I just wonder how the AD=0 rumor ever got started.
It used to be true!? It also
in the past
on this subject. I haven't searched the archives - so am open
to anyone
proving otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But, alas, this didn't work on IGRP or EIGRP.
So if anyone has a good errata for Doyle, Volume I
Zsombor Papp wrote:
At 04:33 PM 7/17/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
I think Cisco was right not to publish the details about these
rare,
specially crafted packets,
I think so. Along the same lines, you also shouldn't publish it
even if you
know it. :)
but does anyone have
The traffic is probably being fast-switched, which means that the debug
process doesn't see it. You would have to disable fast switching, which you
might not want to do because it would affect performance. The command is no
ip route-cache.
Priscilla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a strange
It sounds like this is a hypothetical packet and situation that Cisco
quality assurance discovered. I thought it was something already being
exploited, but it doesn't sound like it. In that case, I guess I support
Cisco not telling us more about it.
It's sort of an age-old security question of
Paul wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question, I have enabled SPAN to mirror from one port to
another.
However, when doing so the transmitting port appears detached
form the
network. i.e.. I cannot ping from the PC attached to that port
and nothing on
the network can ping it too. When I remove
Zsombor Papp wrote:
At 09:54 PM 7/17/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
It sounds like this is a hypothetical packet and situation
that Cisco
quality assurance discovered. I thought it was something
already being
exploited, but it doesn't sound like it. In that case, I guess
I
The new CCDA course is very different. I haven't taken the test but I bet
it's very different also. Here is a synopsis of the syllabus for the new
course:
The first module is on design methodologies. It teaches top-down network
design. The recommended reading is Top-Down Network Design. :-)
wj chou wrote:
do you guys know of any newer and good book talking about
redistribution and default routes? thanks!
There's nothing wrong with the age of Doyle's Routing TCP/IP Volume I. The
poster who claimed that didn't know the difference between a second edition
and a second volume.
missing from
typical workplaces these days. :-)
Priscilla
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plus if
you can believe the errata at Cisco Press's site for Doyle
Volume 1, there
were only 2 mistakes in the book!?
(I think that's
To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about
redistribution.
The example simply shows configuring
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.82
The text says that the router that has that config (which is running RIP by
the way) advertises the default to other RIP routers.
It goes on
Zsombor Papp wrote:
At 10:19 PM 7/16/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
To be fair, I just checked, and Doyle didn't say anthing about
redistribution.
The example simply shows configuring
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.82
The text says that the router that has that config
I got the impression that the router itself is actually mobile. While on
base it connects to an 802.11b access point which somehow has access to the
Internet. I think his second message implies that it goes to another router
that has T1. I don't know if there's actually a wireless bridge link in
Reimer, Fred wrote:
As suggested before creating another vlan would be more ideal.
Why would it be more ideal?
Because it is cleaner. With the proposed solution you would be
dealing with
secondary addresses, traffic for both 10/16 and 11/8 floating
around on the
same VLAN, etc.
I used to use Sniffer and switched to EtherPeek a couple years ago and never
regretted it. A couple times I found that EtherPeek didn't decode a protocol
as well as Sniffer, but I reported it, and the next release had a better
decode.
The best thing about EtherPeek is that the user interface is
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote:
Maybe I'm oversimplifying this, but I would think that you
could do this
simply by running EIGRP and manually setting up the bandwidth
statements to
match each link's bandwidth. When the 802.11b link is
available, your router
should use it as the
fdfdfdfd fdfdfdf wrote:
how loops in one spanning tree affect other spanning trees?
thanks.
By causing lots of traffic. When there's a loop, broadcast and unknown
unicast traffic gets forwarded over and over again. Even if the loop is just
on one logical tree, if it's on a physical link that
John Cianfarani wrote:
Well I decided I wouldn't push it in such a short timeframe
with the one
exam. With work and whatever else probably won't have enough
time to
study fully for it. So I will write either all 4 again, or
cit/bcran
and then the new Composite once it's out.
You
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 5:48 AM -0700 7/10/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
I guess our views on OSPF are slightly different.
I will now release the stage to the next how to increase the
value
of the CCIE certification thread... :)
Thanks,
Zsombor
Zsombor, I appreciate the
Zsombor Papp wrote:
The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA
that is
larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
interfaces).
I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF
messages so
the only logical (implementation independent)
Amazing wrote:
I just did the CCNP recet test two weeks ago and passed with
not too much
studying -- used boson test to see my weak areas and just
brushed up on
those areas -- hint -- you can use the same study materials you
used three
years ago -- nothing has changed.
I wouldn't
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 12:43 PM + 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA
that is
larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
interfaces).
I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple
OSPF
A host uses the TCP maximum segment size option to specify the max size of
TCP segments (packets) that it can accept. In the case where you have the
slow response time, the mainframe is saying that its max segment size is
4056 bytes, which means that it can accept packets of that size (with that
MCMORDIE Shane (BMB) wrote:
Hi,
I'm aiming at CCDP but I don't have BCRAN. Am I correct in
thinking
that there is no point in me registering for CID before
registration
finally ends on July 25th - because to go this route to CCDP,
BCRAN is
also needed - but is no longer available?
answer your question, but maybe there are some hints in the
article that discusse the ip ospf mtu-ignore feature here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/12.html
___
Priscilla Oppenheimer
www.priscilla.com
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer.
Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation
does?
The OSPF code is aware of the MTU and can build OSPF packets
for it.
I don't think you're really going
access speed at end systems
* processing required at end systems and internetworking devices
* software inefficiencies
And about a zillion other things, depending on what you are actually
measuring, which is not bandwidht, but is throughput at some layer. :-)
___
Priscilla
=?iso-8859-1?q?Gerard=20Torin?= wrote:
Hi Dom, we did test with TFY aplication, generating a burst
traffic of 3000 bytes UDP.
Where is the testing being done? Is it through a path that actually handles
a 3000-byte packet without IP fragmentation? ATM might default to a high
MTU, but if
Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote:
Just to conclude an issue that I queried the group on a couple
weeks ago...
We had 2 new 3725 routers with internal DS3 DSUs that would
crash when
downloading large files from the web. These crashes were
happening when
traffic reached 200-300Kbps, which is
Couldn't you use a VLAN? Maybe that's too much work since you're just
testing though But VLANs divide broadcast/multicast domains...
Priscilla
TP wrote:
Dear Group,
I need help about multiscast.
This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer
devices so I
must generate
Amazing wrote:
thanks for the info.
do you know if it is possible to just re-take the CID test to
recert the
CCDP if I have just completed the CCNP recert exam? or do i
have to do the
CCDP recert exam to recert CCDP?
I tried to do that the other way around. In other words I recertified
Janó van Deventer wrote:
On routers, the few nanoseconds saved by outputting voice
first
are irrelvant compared to the hundreds of milliseconds to
reach
the satellite.
Yes maybe, but won't you run into trouble with jitter?
A small variation in delay (jitter) when the delay is
=?iso-8859-1?q?Mr=20piyush=20shah?= wrote:
Dear all
With due respect of this forum ,I would like to ask a
question which might not be related to this forum
I have an telephonic interview with one the US Based
Co next week wherein they might ask me for salary
expectation .
When an
Vikram JeetSingh wrote:
Hi James,
I am not too sure on this, but there is a very good site named
http://acronymfinder.com/ for all acronyms/abbreviations, a
search on the
same one returened the following response.
ITM In the Meantime
ITM In the Money
ITM Inbound
uses SNAP for IP).
You might enjoy my Ethernet lab scenario here:
http://www.troubleshootingnetworks.com/ethernet.html
It mentions that.
Priscilla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
To establish Ethernet encapsulation of IP packets, use one of
the following
Shibu Nair wrote:
If anybody could remember, what is the 802.5 optional field
other than RIF. ?
Thank you
Shibu
The question doesn't make a lot of sense without any context, but the only
thing I can think of is that the 802.2 LLC header is optional. LLC
encapsulates upper-layer data.
Our primary Internet connection was down for 2 days this weekend. The main
purpose of this message isn't to air our dirty laundry but to provide some
humor and some lessons learned. Check out the article that our local
newspaper wrote on the subject:
- jvd wrote:
jvd, it's nice to have you on the list.
It looks like you post using the Web site. A lot of people do GroupStudy via
e-mail. They can't tell what your messages refer to. They seem like orphans.
When posting from the Web, please press the Quote button first and then add
comments, and
Janó van Deventer wrote:
At 11:05 PM 6/30/2003 +, Shibu Nair wrote:
Hi
Can somebody let me know what exact keyword (not icmp type
number) should
be used
to enable the incoming access-list for trace route unix
application to work
fine...
I know UDP should be allowed
Thomas Larus wrote:
Thanks for the eye-opener. I did not know that many of the
errors one finds
in technical books are introduced in the editorial process.
Nor did I know
that the publishers are not strong on things like diagrams and
cover art.
It sounds like I might do better working
james kong wrote:
I have read Routing and Switching Written Exam (350-001)Study
Suggestions.
This item is on the list---ITM from the Cisco Connection
Training CD (DOC-CCTCD) Order ITM online.will U tell me the
mean of ITM?Thank you very much!!!
It stands for Internetworking Technology
Ashok C Braganza wrote:
I have a strange problem; all my Microsoft XP Professional
operating system
client computers are sending and receiving packets continues
(Ethernet
Adapter light blinks continues) which are connected to Cisco
switch, but if
I connect to normal hub or 3com switch,
kuma kk wrote:
hello group,
I am facing a slow response issue on the network, have
captured the packet
with etherreal and found that the IP header for the data
orignated from the
source hosts have Header checksum as incorrect.
Noticed this error for all the TCPsegments
E.g : Header
If FTP doesn't work but HTTP does work, it's obviously an upper-layer
problem, as someone else mentioned. One possibility is an access list
somewhere, a firewall, personal firewalls.
Are the affected users on different types of computers, operating systems,
applications? That would be my guess.
Thanks Howard. I had just been wondering about this very topic myself. You
plugged one of your books, but I learned a lot about this same topic from
another one of your books, which I will plug! :-)
WAN Survival Guide
That book is really helpful for people like myself who mainly work on the
Dom wrote:
As a shirt-lifter (an old English expression)
Can you tell us what it means? Or not on this type of list. :-)
I have no idea
what you
are talking about.
And, you have confused my cats!
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
SysDom Technologies
Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
Zsombor Papp wrote:
As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :)
I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-)
I've never seen TCP run over anything other than IP, although in theory it
could. The devil in the details though.
Assuming no changes and compatibility
Black Jack wrote:
That is very interesting. Can you give us a little more
background about how your relationship with your publisher went
so badly wrong?
Sounds like I exaggerated a bit. :-) It didn't go that wrong. The publisher
says that the problems are all related to the economic
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Zsombor Papp wrote:
As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :)
I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-)
I've never seen TCP run over anything other than IP, although
in theory it could.
Has anyone seen TCP run over
rbx10 Defcom wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if someone can explain to me what is
Link-Local to L3 to L2 mapping under Cisco RS Blue print
under In the IP Multicast Section.
My guess is that you don't have the phrase quite right. :-) It's probably
link local L3-to-L2 mapping and simply
Larry Letterman wrote:
I would think that the physical interface can only support 1
type of
layer1/2
Encapsulation at one time..either frame or hdlc etc..
A physical interface can support more than one encapsulation. It just
depends on who it thinks is going to understand the
Zsombor Papp wrote:
c.) In general, you can. In the case of Ethernet interfaces for
instance,
you can specify encapsulation on a subinterface level.
On an Ethernet subinterface you can specify the VLAN tagging method using an
encapsulation command. That is specific to a router that is
It's not a dumb question, as far as I can tell, but it's awfully hard to
parse due to your stream of consciousness style and lack of paragarpahs.
White space is a good thing. :-)
There's nothing wrong with IP secondary addresses as far as I know. They can
come in handy. And yes you can have
1 - 100 of 2484 matches
Mail list logo
