It depends on a lot of things. We found over the years even if they were
set to full, and the ahrdware supported it, they would flip back to half. I
am thinking we got a couple to work using GD 12.1 images, but have not
visited the issue in a while. They definiately did not work on the early
Real world I had to deal with this to add 'legacy' Motorola equipment
attached to a larger Cisco network. The business unit never bought the OSPF
license for the Motorolas.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Again, a CCIE practice lab -
R5 - the task calls for
My experience with Tivoli NetView was that if the different interfaces had
different names, then I got multiple router objects, each with some of the
interfaces of the router. If you use QIP for DNS you can place the
interface IPs in a 'router group'. Reverse lookups will get the same
(router
I've had those before...once! Not very good. Would not want to build a
network on them.
Logan, Harold wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think your problem with the dipping dots analogy is that dipping dots have
to be served from the bottom up; there's no such
That would be the idea: if you cannot find it on the web site's exam content
list, it just might not be on test anymore. Pay careful attention to what
IS on that list, that is not in the official review books. You will need
some research and self-study to be prepared in those areas.
Malcolm
Passed the CID 3.0 test this afternoon. (Hmm wonder if I just violated the
NDA?) Thanks to Priscilla for Top-Down Network Design, Paul for having this
place, and all those who answered my questions over the last few years!
Steve Ringley
CCNP/CCDP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
Hmm, we use a lot of those, but they are always hooked to a Baytech port
rather than direct to a Cisco port. As I recall its a 9600 81N port. If
you have not already found it, http://www.baytech.net/ftp_series.shtml might
be some help.
John Tafasi wrote in message
[EMAIL
An SNMP notification is a trap. Its that simple. I looked at some Cisco
SNMP feature web pages and that is how they used the term.
John Tafasi wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What is the difference between an SNMP notification and an SNMP trap?
Message Posted
I think I have reached my 'rule' actually. In a normal situation, I would
want the Internet ASBRs injecting default routes on area 0, as that is where
everything is passing through anyway. This assumes a 'clean' environment
where the only things being routed in the OSPF AS are private addresses.
Normally you would want to fix the ports on connections you know will not
change, like trunks, routers, servers, etc. You do have to watch out for
vendor implementations however. When troubleshooting issues with an IBM
2216 router (think 7507 with CIP) I found a tech note from IBM stating that
ROTECTED]...
At 6:56 PM + 1/26/03, Steve Ringley wrote:
I understand that there are many ways to, umm, do you-know-what to the cat,
but what I am looking for is a higher guiding philosophy or rule to use as
a
foundation to guide the rest of the process. My understanding of the
high-level OSPF
0.
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 8:56 PM + 1/25/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Steve Ringley wrote:
That is why I am asking the question - it is unclear! Let me
try it this
way:
If we take the textbook Internet setup,
Ah, thank you Pat! That is exactly what I was trying to bring out!
Pat Do wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm enrolled in Cisco's CCNP Network Academy program and just completed
their Multi-Layer Switching curriculum last semester.
In their online curriculum, they
the ASBR will connect to the Internet in your
example.
Steve Ringley wrote:
I have an OSPF network, and I have my Internet connections. Do
I:
ASBR where traffic goes from area 0 to the Internet
Is that where your Internet connection is? In area 0? Often, it is, and
that's where your ASBR will be.
o
As you have seen from the replies this is rather fluid. Many of the
traditionally set-based switches are now getting software updates that
convert them to IOS switches. What may be important here that seems to be
missing from the discussion so far is that my CiscoPress CCNP/DP study
material
I have an OSPF network, and I have my Internet connections. Do I:
ASBR where traffic goes from area 0 to the Internet
or
ASBR where traffic goes to an area x then to the Internet?
This was never clear to me from my reading.
Message Posted at:
I would appreciate feedback from anyone who has actually used this product.
Thanks!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60936t=60936
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Its unconfirmed, (i.e.: I do not believe it yet) but our CW2000 admin
claimed CW2000 needed it for something. Before that came up I assumed that
it was no longer needed except on 2500 series and other routers that had an
old boot rom that did not support enable secret.
Kenny Smith wrote in
Tis an interesting question. I went into the online tracking system for an
opinion. There, CCIE allows you to skip the CCNA and common exams
requirement, but you still have to have to have CCDA and a valid CID exam.
The CCIE option did not appear under my CCNP options.
jeff sicuranza wrote in
When you have to make simple facts difficult, ambiguity is the best way! I
took my CCNP exams just before the switch, and the only way I could see to
make them more difficult would be to make the questions more ambiguous.
Joshua Barnes wrote in message
Add Netbeui to your Windows clients on Ethernet. DLSW will bridge this and
you should see some traffic.
Robert Massiache wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi All
I tried to perform DLSW in home lab, but with ethernet interfaces.
Sh dlsw peers shows successfull
Indeed, somebody finally summarized MPLS in a couple of sentences rather
than a white paper. Our company left ATT due to poor service last year for
Worldcom. At Worldcom someone answers when you call, and they usually call
back with progress on a regular basis. At ATT, you get to leave a voice
One thing I have not seen discussed yet is why you would have both in the
config. Older routers like 2500s with REAL boot roms did not intially
support enable secret. You thus had to have an enable password configured
so that if the router crashed to boot rom, it still had some protection. If
I tried the ISDN IM, and found that it would not run in XP. This is Cisco's
offical position also. I had a WinME box running, so I tried it there. The
sim part had rpoblems and did not work well either. Does the BGP IM
actually work?
Johnny Routin wrote in message
[EMAIL
You'll learn to hate SNMP status as it tends to be less than accurate. I
use it only when there is no other choice.
Brian Backer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
A scheduled snmp poll is excessively intensive We used
5 minute ping rotation which aren't and
have
not changed, I am sure that 3.0 will require you to know the newer equipment
and how Cisco wants you to position it. Knowing what type of equipment to
use where was a part of the 2.0 test.
Steve Ringley, CCNP
Keith J. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Its three years actually.
Mark Odette II wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Jarred- You have 2 years from the point of obtaining your CCNA to
complete your CCNP, or recertify on your CCNA.
For the exam version change, I don't believe there is really any change
How long does it normally take for Cisco to send the paper cert out after
passing the last exam? I passed the Support exam yesterday, which completed
my CCNP. I seem to recall a sevearl week wait three years ago for my CCNA
paper cert.
Kris Keen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Funny you should mention that. I took the last exam on June 3, and my CCNA
expired on June 4. Today (June 5) I checked the online tracking system and
it shows me as CCNP through June 3,2005. It appears you CAN wait to the
last minute...
Rick wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
I logged into Prometric, and the new exams were not available to register
for. Might try registering online to get the old exams.
Jeff Harris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I hope that because I signed up for the old exams on Monday (Switching on
Friday,
For what its worth, my studies during my CCNP prep indicated the textbook
solution was to set BW = Port Speed on the physical interface, and BW = CIR
on the subinterfaces. I also found 2600 routers with internal CSUs actually
adjust BW to equal the number of channels configured on the CSU.
I have not seen a discussion of Self Test Software here. They are the
authorized practice test provider for Cisco. Has anyone used their
materials? I am considering options for the CCDA and CCDP tests - both of
which have changed recently. Thanks!
Message Posted at:
I looked deeper, and they do not have any DA/DP tests. Would still be
curious to know how they are on the stuff they do have though.
Steve Ringley wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have not seen a discussion of Self Test Software here. They are the
au
Its an interesting question about the exam though as the 700 series is not
on the current product list. I am working on this exam next, and hate to
spend time on something that has passed from relevance.
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
OK, I'm
34 matches
Mail list logo
