>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> Significant interest in Asia.
>> Selected industries: HDTV, 3G wireless, new generation air
>> traffic control
>
>HDTV? Do you have any thoughts or pointers as to why HDTV
>would be looking at v6?
When I was at Nortel, we were told by the HDTV people that the
And I don't mean the Starship Enterprise. :-) I'm pretty sure they do use
IPng, though.
Seriously, regarding IPv6. Who's currently migrating to it? Any enterprise
networks that aren't providers of some sort?
I'm going to assume that at some unknown point in the futu
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> Significant interest in Asia.
>> Selected industries: HDTV, 3G wireless, new generation air
>> traffic control
>
>HDTV? Do you have any thoughts or pointers as to why HDTV
>would be looking at v6?
When I was at Nortel, we were told by the HDTV people that the
; Seriously, regarding IPv6. Who's currently migrating to it? Any enterprise
> networks that aren't providers of some sort?
>
> I'm going to assume that at some unknown point in the future IPv6 will
> finally push IPv4 completely off the radar. Any guesses about how lo
Eurocontrol, the European organisation for safety of air navigation, is
planning to migrate parts of their international X.25 based networks to
IPv6.
Later UMTS (wireless 3G networks) releases will use IPv6 as well. Will last
some years though.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "a
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> Significant interest in Asia.
>> Selected industries: HDTV, 3G wireless, new generation air
>> traffic control
>
>HDTV? Do you have any thoughts or pointers as to why HDTV
>would be looking at v6?
When I was at Nortel, we were told by the HDTV people that the
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> Significant interest in Asia.
> Selected industries: HDTV, 3G wireless, new generation air
> traffic control
HDTV? Do you have any thoughts or pointers as to why HDTV
would be looking at v6?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
uldn't fit into the 128 petabyte RAM.
[1] For non-fans, Benjamin Sisko. Hey, spellings change in 300 years.
>
>Seriously, regarding IPv6. Who's currently migrating to it? Any enterprise
networks that aren't providers of some sort?
Significant interest in Asia.
Selected indust
Hello all,
Is it possible to configure a Cisco router as just a host in IPv6
network. Would that be equivalent having a Windows PC running IPv6
stack in the network coexisting with other routers?
Thanks,
Rajesh
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73110&
$20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rajesh Kumar
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Capturing IPv6 packets. [7:73033]
Hello everybody,
I am wondering if there is any tool like Sniffer / Ethereal which
Hello everybody,
I am wondering if there is any tool like Sniffer / Ethereal which
allows capturing and analysing IPv6 traffic?
Thanks,
Rajesh
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73033&t=73033
--
FAQ, list
Dear all:
I have a question here and have no idea yet.
At Cisco IPv6 enable router,
we can use interface command
"ipv6 address ipv6-prefix/prefix-length eui-64"
to assign a IPv6 address on it.
At ethernet clone
ng group, as well as the two IRTF reports on future
domain routing.
But niche applications will grow.
>
> > >>
>> >> For example, people talk about how wonderful ipv6 is for
>> >> eliminating the
>> >> need for NAT and how you can now give every
nd regards.
Paul.
> -Original Message-
> From: nrf [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 21 September 2002 20:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: dumb question IPV6 [7:53712]
>
> >
> > For one, the economic benefit of being able to change ISPs
is over.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> For example, people talk about how wonderful ipv6 is for
> >> eliminating the
> >> need for NAT and how you can now give every device in the world
> >> its own
> > > unique address.
>
> Speakin
t in V6 addressing, only the low-order part of the address needs
to be enterprise-specific.
New revenue streams MAY be possible with some of the organizations
that already have adopted V6, such as 3rd generation wireless, HDTV,
and next-generation air traffic control.
>
>
>>
>
Hi Priscilla -
Can I ask you to expound a bit on something you said in an earlier
discussion? When talking about IPv6, you mentioned:
> ...even though NAT is a horrid solution from a
> technical standpoint.
I don't have an opinion about NAT simply due to a lack o
ed into something, so they can gripe and
> complain about how complicated it is, when if they would just plan ahead
for
> the inevitable,
First of all, ipv6 is far from inevitable. There is raging debate about
just how inevitable it really is. What if it turns out to be much ado about
nothi
tra protocols in your enterprise just 'for fun', you do it
because your enterprise actually needs it. And besides what exactly is the
point of running ipv6 internally if your carrier is still running ipv4?
Which brings us to the carriers. Ipv6 was meant for really large networks,
l
in
> place to justify the expense of migrating and maintaining two
> protocols in
> the interim? What's the ROI?
That's a very good point. And it applies to the enterprise corporate side
too. What financial benefits do they gain??
Priscilla
>
> For example, people talk about h
Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: dumb question IPV6 [7:53712]
Yes, it was me that said 2007. Seems the courts want to push the
deadline on updating TV signals before the due date, maybe IPV6 will
follow. In the past people have p
Yes, it was me that said 2007. Seems the courts want to push the
deadline on updating TV signals before the due date, maybe IPV6 will
follow. In the past people have pushed to use certain technology, now
its time for us to sit back, because technology is starting to take over
by itself. Meaning
maintaining two protocols in
the interim? What's the ROI?
For example, people talk about how wonderful ipv6 is for eliminating the
need for NAT and how you can now give every device in the world its own
unique address. But the crucial question is how exactly do the providers
benefit financially
conversion to IPv6 won't be that bad I don't think. Someone
asked about a timeframe. (Was it you?) I think it will be beofre 2007. Five
years from now, who knows where we'll be? ;-)
Priscilla
Brian Zeitz wrote:
>
> I am for IPV6, I think with e-commerce applications, and
>
I remember scripting my first IPv6 tool for IPv6-IPv4 DNS compatibility
back in 96/97 during university days .. still surprised that the
standpoint for IPv6 among IETF committee members is still the same some
6-7 years ago as it is today (well, maybe with 1 or 2 forward movements
since).. nice to
I am for IPV6, I think with e-commerce applications, and because there
is a trend to use "internet enabled" devices. I know it would be
confusing for system engineers, just when everyone understood IPV4 I
know there are some updated troubleshooting tools, ICMP as well. I think
cri
We have a pilot of IPv6 running on our campus currently.
Larry
Brian Zeitz wrote:
>Can anyone give a guess to when IPV6 will be implemented in the US?
>2007?
--
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems Inc.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
Brian Zeitz wrote:
>
> Can anyone give a guess to when IPV6 will be implemented in the
> US?
> 2007?
>
>
IPv6 is already in use on Internet 2, which is pretty prevalent at
universities. More info here:
http://www.internet2.edu/html/about.html
Other than Internet 2
Can anyone give a guess to when IPV6 will be implemented in the US?
2007?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53712&t=53712
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/ci
There are some old IPv6 beta images running around out there that have
crazy stuff like OSPF/BGP in the image for the Cisco 1000 series routers
- anyone got this stuff lying around? I just dusted off a 1003 and I'd
like it to do more than just access duty in the lab.
--
Neal Rauhauser
7;ve been running this stuff in a production network and I've
> just hit
> the wall - its all coming out in a week after I get back from
> class and
> some nice, conservative GD image is taking its place.
>
> I didn't even get to touch IPv6 in production ... the
after I get back from
> class and
> some nice, conservative GD image is taking its place.
>
> I didn't even get to touch IPv6 in production ... the IPv4
> stuff is
> just too screwy.
>
>
>
> --
> Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 4
Well, combine all of this with the fac that application support is still
lacking.
Yes, Winblows XP does have it but it is rough.
Anyone know of any IPv6 software calculators? I like to doublecheck myself
since IPv6 is taking alittle getting used to.
I got my /48 from UUnet and now I am ready to
I still stand by my original convictions, which is that ipv6 will not be
adopted en-masse by regular American enterprises until and unless it is
economically justified to do so - and there is nothing unfortunate about
this, that's just the way economics works (economics being the study o
Let me make a couple of observations. First, IPv6 is the standard for
a few niches, such as 3rd generation wireless and the infrastructure
for HDTV. If you will interface with these sectors, you will need to
use it. I think it's also being used in some new air traffic control
systems.
S
to find
even more. It's costly to drill and explore. Similarly, it's costly to
migrate to ipv6 and develop new tools and skills. So why should the US
migrate until it really is close to running out of ipv4 addresses (which,
like I said, it is not even close)?
""Scott Nelson&
Not with the USA fat and happy with enough v4 addresses for awhile. Plus
rfc1918, NAT and CIDR has helped a lot.
It's unfortunate but, until we here in the USA get hit with the neccessity
to move to IPv6, we are going to be slow to adopt it.
http://isp-planet.com/business/2002/ipv6_wait
My company would merge with another company soon. Both companies use
10.0.0.0/8 subnet, so we have to change one of them. I'm thinking maybe
it's a good chance to go ipv6. What do you guys think on this? Will ipv6
go enterprise soon?
Thanks.
Yoshi
Message Poste
Does anyone have any of the old IPv6 beta images for 16xx series?
These would be the ones that provided BGP on access routers :-) I have a
ton of 1605s hanging around so I am whipping up a little lab.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46009&
ward them. They are Layer 2 multicasts.
Regarding AppleTalk's dynamic addressing, sorry that you think it's lame.
The IPv6 developers don't. Their stateless autoconfiguration if very
similar. comments below). Regarding your CCNA comment about obtaining a
unique address with AppleT
What's the best book on IPv6 out there? Anyone?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42403&t=42403
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report m
Yes, go to check the site www.ipv6.org
- Original Message -
From: "Hamid Ali Asgari"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Book on IPv6 [7:40515]
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions?
&
Hi,
I've working on cisco routers with IPv6 since three years ago, and in my
experience this field is evolving so fast that no book is current enough.
If you just want an introductory view, "Interworking IPv6 with Cisco
Routers" is ok, but lacks important parts, IS-IS for ins
There's a good one by Mark Miller, called Implementing IPv6.
At 03:29 PM 4/4/02, Hamid Ali Asgari wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions?
>
>Thanks
>
>Hamid
>
>
>__
>Do You Yahoo!?
&
Try a search on Amazon looking for IPv6 and IPnG. Several years ago two
books were published. One was authored by Scott Bradner. I'd imagine that
the lastest TCP/IP book Vol I by Douglas Comer would have a good discussion.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hamid Ali Asgari [ma
Your right, I just checked Chapter 8 in the book has an entires chapter
to this subject. Also, I found an IBM Redbook that had a chapter on it.
(I don't like IBM, just happen to stumble upon this.) There are also
lots of information floating around on the internet. Set up an IPV6 LAN,
PROTECTED]
Subject: Book on IPv6 [7:40515]
Hi,
I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Hamid
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstud
Hi,
I am looking for a book on IPv6. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Hamid
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40515&
.bomb failures have lengthened the usefulness of v4 I am sure..
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> Another question,
>
> When's IPv6 gonna hit the mainstream? Or the backbone? Of all the stuff
I
>
A peer of mine is doing some testing of IPv6, has a tunnel to the
6bone. There are a lot of organizations running some IPv6, more all the
time. As for mainstream I would guess it's a good couple of years. It
obviously cannot happen overnight but you will have the early adopters
as as
had to look up RFC 1149. A classic!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:48 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: IPv6 [7:31228]
> >
> >
> > Another question,
>
Security.
BTW I had to look up RFC 1149. A classic!
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: IPv6 [7:31228]
>
>
> Another question,
>
> When&#
Another question,
When's IPv6 gonna hit the mainstream? Or the backbone? Of all the stuff I
ever read on it, the main reason it came into play was because of the
impending depletion of public addresses. Well with NAT, firewall and other
proxy services handiling a lot of requests ont
There is Early Field Trials software for the 2500 series, although it has
been removed from CCO according to http://www.cisco.com/ipv6. But can be
found here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/732/ipv6/download.html
But, I believe most of the 2500 series were end-of-lifed earlier this year.
The
I don't know if any of you have noticed, but there is a lack of code for the
c2500's in the 12.2T IOS train (the IPv6 release). Does anyone know if Cisco
plans on releasing IPv6 code for the 2500's, or is this the way that they are
going to 'end of life' the 2500's?
Hi,
Have a look at www.routerzone.com , they have a section called ipv6 where
you can find some good links.
Regards,
Cezar
""CCB"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone recommend some good whitepapers and/or books on IPv
Can anyone recommend some good whitepapers and/or books on IPv6.
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8475&t=8475
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.
IPv4 to IPv6? It looks to me like
deliberately created fuel for confusion.
My Answer:
IPv4 header might vary between 20 to 60 octets,
and in first 20 octets there are 11 fields which need to be looked at
and possibly processed by routers along the path traversing internet.
This unnecessary
Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/ipv6/
Click on 'Learn About Cisco IOS IPv6'
Click on 'Obtain IOS Beta Software'
The doco states that you need 12.2(0.5)T - not 12.2(1)T.
You have actually been able to get hold of this stuff for a while - but only
via
Has anybody gotten the IOS version that has Ipv6? I know Cisco said it was
going to be available at the end of May, and it's the end of May. According
to Cisco's Web site, the version is 12.2(1)T, but when I go to the download
center, I don't see any 12.2(1) T option.
Thanx
Daniel,
Thanks very much for the link.
Zak
"Daniel Cotts" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> See below:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/ipv6/
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.h
See below:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/Tech/ipv6/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4996&t=4996
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscon
>I did a quick read of RFC titles, but did not see anything that looked
>promising
>
>Ipv6 appears to me to have been created as a way of dealing with the IP
>number shortage. Of course all related protocols and stacks will have to be
>modified to work with Ipv6
>
>For BG
I did a quick read of RFC titles, but did not see anything that looked
promising
Ipv6 appears to me to have been created as a way of dealing with the IP
number shortage. Of course all related protocols and stacks will have to be
modified to work with Ipv6
For BGP - will the AS field be upped to
Looking on CCO, unable to find out the minimum req's to see if current
equipment is compatible with IPV6...?? Any leads would be appreciated.
Rick Watson
Network Engineer
OUSD(Comptroller)
703.697.5710
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I had read
Ipv6 : The New Internet Protocol by Christian Huitema
Now there is the second edition of the book. Should be better than the
first edition!
2nd edition: Paperback - 247 pages 2nd edition Prentice Hall; ISBN:
0138505055
Regards
Geoff
- Original Message -
From: "
Has anyone out there read any good books on the subject matter of IPv6?
I don't point me to RFCs I know that much. I just want to know if there is
any good book material out there I can grab and read to clerify the issue.
Thanks!
_
FAQ, list archives
Neal Rauhauser wrote:
> I will provide to anyone who connects the following:
>
> 1. an IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel
> 2. a /60 of IPv6 addresses that are globally routeable
> 3. an internal BGP peering session to AS 12023
> 4. telnet access to the core router to help with troub
I changed jobs a few months back and as part of my new duties I get
to learn a lot about IPv6.
I have a Cisco 7206 VXR 300 that is dedicated to being an IPv6
access point. The router is part of AS12023 and its connected via
ethernet to our border router that peers with UUNet (AS701
I don't know if anyone else noticed but there *IS* an image
for the little Cisco 1000 series boxes that does OSPF and BGP.
I am running the old 11.3 based IOS IPv6 beta image and it works
great. The 12.0 based IPv6 image, besides being too large to fit on the
2 meg flas
Anyone have any good sources for IPv6? Books? Webpages? WhitePapers?
Just starting to fool around with it, just wondering where I can some
detailed information on the IP protocol.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Marco Paulo Rodrigues
another site is www.6bone.net
it has all the links to get your 'learn onz'
Manishkumar Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All!
> Can anybody tell me what is Loopback address for IPv6.
> Any site good
The loop back address in IPv6 is
:::::::1
This can be shortned to :
::1
A nice basic article can be found on :
http://www.samw.com/knowledge/whitepapers27.asp?whitepaperid=27&institution%
5Fid=
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Manishk
Hi All!
Can anybody tell me what is Loopback address for IPv6.
Any site good for IPv6 concepts?
Thanks
MK
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For
>Also it wouldn't hurt to skim over
> > IS-IS I have heard rumors that IS-IS will replace OSPF when IPv6 becomes
> > more in use. IPv6 is based on NSAP addresses.
> >
> > Matt C. Lange
> > CCNP CCDP MCSE CS
V6 is not based on NSAP addresses, altho
IPv6 uses multicasts instead of broadcasts, so unlike ipv4 where a
/31 is unuseable the /127 works just fine. I have half a dozen working
ipv6 tunnels to prove this :-)
Brad Beck wrote:
>
> Interesting I'm curious how you can have a /127 address, since this
> all
Interesting I'm curious how you can have a /127 address, since this
allows you only a network and broadcast, but no host bits
Am I missing something??
-Brad
Brad Beck, CCNA
WAN Administrator
Diva Systems
> ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127
At 10:06 PM 5/15/00 -05
I've colocated a Cisco 7120 at pensat.com and I am working with an
engineer there to get ipv6 tunnels working. I've got half a dozen set up
but we need to hit 40+ before they qualify for the next size block of
IPv6 numbers.
IPv6 is interesting but there are some other goodies
78 matches
Mail list logo
