RE: TCP

2000-07-18 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
The receiver will look at the data and see that it has already received it and drop it. Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

RE: TCP

2000-07-18 Thread harora
Pls. elaborate your point of view Thanks in advance Hitesh Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/18/2000 08:39:06 PM Please respond to Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: harora, [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: TCP The receiver will look at the data and see

RE: TCP

2000-07-19 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 10:55 PM > To: Ole Drews Jensen > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TCP > > Pls. elaborate your p

RE: TCP

2000-07-25 Thread John Nemeth
On Dec 9, 4:01am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } } Pls. elaborate your point of view It is not a "point of view", but rather part of the TCP spec. You asked what happens to the original piece of data when a duplicate arrives due to the lose of an acknowledgement packet. The short answer is th

RE: TCP Methodology

2000-07-05 Thread Daniel Cotts
Think of the network connection diagrams that show lines at each level of the IOS model connecting the hosts at each end. Layer 4 TCP at host A is talking to layer 4 TCP at host B. If layer 3 IP messes up then it is up to TCP to detect the error and notify the other end to retransmit. Each layer h

Re: TCP Methodology

2000-07-06 Thread TKager
Essentially IP is responsible for addressing the packet so that it conveys information about the location of the destination and therefore can be routed. TCP is responsible for establishing and maintaining reliable communications. This means that if TCP A sends data to TCP B and this data is no

RE: TCP/IP RFCs

2000-09-20 Thread Timmons, Robert
Probably the best thing you can do is search for specific areas of interest. Check out: http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/information/rfc.html For example, if you want to read up on BGP, do a keyword search for BGP or BGP-4. Typically, at the end of each RFC, they'll have references t

Re: TCP/IP RFCs

2000-09-21 Thread Eric Fritzges
In addition: IP - #791 TCP - #793 UDP - #768 ARP - #826 -Eric "Timmons, Robert" wrote: > > Probably the best thing you can do is search for specific > areas of interest. Check out: > > http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/information/rfc.html > > For example, if you want to read up on

RE: Tcp/ip question

2000-07-13 Thread jeongwoo park
your help. jeongwoo --Original Message-- From: "Koen&Beth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 14, 2000 12:56:52 AM GMT Subject: RE: Tcp/ip question I forgot to say how I remembered it If I saw a Class B IP Address and it had

RE: Tcp/ip question

2000-07-14 Thread jeongwoo park
;Beth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 14, 2000 6:05:09 AM GMT Subject: RE: Tcp/ip question No that's not correct You can have a class B with subnet mask 255.252.0.0 but that's supernetting and alot more complicated then subnetting. It us

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Phil Barker
The length isn't explicitly transmitted but is computed via the Sequence Number and Ack Number. RFC 793 has more detail. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html Regards, Phil. PS: There are some talented women on this site !! "Guy" --- Thomas Peroutka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, >

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>The length isn't explicitly transmitted but is >computed via the Sequence Number and Ack Number. > >RFC 793 has more detail. > >http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html > >Regards, > >Phil. > >PS: There are some talented women on this site !! >"Guy" Excellent answer! I was about to go check the

Re: TCP/ UDP header

2000-08-29 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr
I thought that these numbers are randomly generated, and the the length was contained in a psuedo header. Duck - Original Message - From: Phil Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Thomas Peroutka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 4:26 A

RE: TCP Connection terminated

2000-06-20 Thread Rampley, Jim
This trap is being caused by someone closing a telnet session from the router sending the trap. Jim -Original Message- From: Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 4:20 AM Subject: TCP Connection terminated Hi, I our company, we have a HP Openview NNM and some Cisco routers (4500, 7200). Afte

Re: TCP/IP layers

2000-06-21 Thread jeep
there are five layer in TCP/IP model, lower 4 layer are almost the same as OSI ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violat

Re: TCP/IP layers

2000-06-21 Thread Michael L. Williams
Check out this article on Cisco web site.   http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/centri4/user/scf4ap1.htm   Also, this page shows how TCP/IP layers function.   http://www.scan-technologies.com/tutorials/TCPIP%20Tutorial.htm   Basically, I see alot of people trying to make eve

Re: TCP/IP layers

2000-06-23 Thread wzup
Should I assume that the BCRAN book by Thomas M. Thomas & Adam Quiggle (McGraw Hill, Technical Expert) is not a good book for preparing for the BCRAN exam? Please advise before I purchase the Cisco Press BCRAN book. --- "Michael L. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Check out this article

Re: TCP/IP layers

2000-06-24 Thread deltan
It's the DOD model (not five layers as "claimed" by someone here). --- Sammi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I understand TCP/IP packets, and the OSI Network > Model 7 layers. > However I'm not sure what is meant by TCP/IP layers? > Would this be > reference to the 4 layer IPX model: > Appl

RE: TCP/IP layers

2000-06-25 Thread Aaron K. Dixon
There are 4 layers in the TCP/ip model. They are: Network Interface Internet Host-to-host Application If you need more information about what the layers do or how they map to the OSI model let me know. Regards, Aaron K. Dixon WAN Element Manager - Cisco Omnes, A Schlumberger Company -Ori

Re: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-05 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 2:17 PM + 8/5/03, Janik James wrote: >Here are some tcp questions: > >1.Can the sender send more than the window size? No. >2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in? Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/

RE: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-07 Thread gab S.E jones
1.Can the sender send more than the window size? No a sender can not send more than the window size e.g if we have two hosts A and B and B's advertised window size is 32kb. Upon the first tcp connection A(sender) can send up to the maximum window sise(segments) and it then has to wait for an ac

RE: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
lication before it >expects return data, then it would set the PSH bit on the second packet. > > > >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:15 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: tcp [7:73518] >

Re: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > >> 2.Can receiver send ack before whole window comes in? > > Not for the window it's receiving, but for a previous window. > Unless you're Microsoft. http://grotto11.com/blog/slash.html?+1039831658 This isn't to make this a

RE: tcp [7:73518]

2003-08-14 Thread Reimer, Fred
---Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: tcp [7:73518] At 2:17 PM + 8/5/03, Janik James wrote: >Here are some tcp questions: > >1.Can the sender send more than the window siz

Re: TCP port for Napster

2001-02-13 Thread Gary Bryant
Napster seems to use a wide range of ports, whatever it finds available. The only successful way that I have found to block Napster is to block the server IP addresses, which are actually found in two blocks. deny ip any 208.184.216.0 0.0.0.255 log deny ip any 64.124.41.0 0.0.0.255 log permit ip

RE: TCP port number 0

2001-01-19 Thread 천리안메일
ahp (51), eigrp (88), esp (50), gre (47), igrp (9), icmp (1), igmp (2), igrp (9), ip (0), ipinip (4), nos (94), ospf (89), pcp (108), pim (103), tcp (6), or udp (17). 0 is 'ip'. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nurarif W Sent: Friday, Jan

Re: TCP port number 0

2001-01-19 Thread Chris Miles
Hi, Without seeing the actual access-list, I would imagine that no port numbers are being logged because you are not interrogating the traffic at a port level, simply at a protocol level. You are seeing TCP traffic but not checking for the port. For example, if you have a list that resembles th

Re: TCP port number 0

2001-01-19 Thread zhzh
- Original Message - From: ""õ¸®¾È¸ÞÀÏ"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:06 AM Subject: RE: TCP port number 0 > ahp (51), eigrp (88), esp (50), gre (47), igrp (9), icmp (1), igmp (2), igrp (9), ip (0), i

Re: TCP port number 0

2001-01-19 Thread Neil Desai
Most likely someone was trying to do some "passive OS fingerprinting" with hping2. The default port the hping2 uses is 0. They might have been trying to map your network or they may have been just poking around. Neil ""Nurarif W"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 009c01c081eb$19cc9730$1600

RE: TCP port number 0

2001-01-19 Thread Chuck Larrieu
TCP port 0 is reserved. Bookmark this site: http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/port-numbers Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nurarif W Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: tcp intercept [7:3685]

2001-05-08 Thread andyh
check http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur _c/scprt3/scdenial.htm or alternatively search for tcp and intercept at: www.cisco.com like I just did Andy - Original Message - From: "Jeff Duchin" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:27 PM Subject:

Re: tcp intercept [7:3685]

2001-05-08 Thread Jeff Duchin
I found them as well, thanks. I guess I need to rephrase the question... there are many parameters (watch-timeout/drop-mode,etc.) that you can configure and I was wondering what most people out there are using? There's usually pros and cons to everything and talking to people who have already do

Re: TCP Sequence. [7:9918]

2001-06-26 Thread Phil Barker
With regard to the Window sizes agreeing a common value (1024) the answer is generally no. Let Host A have a large buffer and host B have a small buffer. If the window sizes had to agree then the window would have no choice but to take the smaller size. The window sizes are for host A and host B r

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow
i think this is because the window size is allowed to get much larger befrore something gets dropped on a higer speed segment. i think sending the window size is still used. also dont forget that sometimes ICMP is used to control certain things. of course you've read the rfcs, the authoritative

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 10:01 AM 7/10/01, Peter Slow wrote: >i think this is because the window size is allowed to get much larger >befrore something gets dropped on a higer speed segment. Would a TCP recipient know it was on a high-speed segment, though? A sender might have some idea because it tracks congestion, b

Re: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Michael L. Williams
Comments below.. "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 10:01 AM 7/10/01, Peter Slow wrote: > >i think this is because the window size is allowed to get much larger > >befrore something gets dropped on a higer speed segment. > > Would a TCP

Re: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 06:38 PM 7/10/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: >Comments below.. > >"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 10:01 AM 7/10/01, Peter Slow wrote: > > >i think this is because the window size is allowed to get much larger > > >befrore someth

Re: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Michael L. Williams
NICE! See below. "Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > A recipient is not told to use a window size by the sender. Each side has > its own receive window size, based on its own buffer space. It used to be > that a recipient ACKed whe

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Ayers, Michael
OK, See if I have it here. The receive window is a buffer. It is specified in bytes. During the 3 way handshake, each side tells the other it's buffer size. This is the start of our flow control. During the 3 way handshake, Each side also specifies a sequence number. The other will r

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Brett Johnson
Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, page 266-267. And this appears to be happening in the sniffer trace that I was examine. Brett -Original Message- From: Ayers, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP Ack [7:11703] OK

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Ayers, Michael
OK I'm reposting because my original got cut off. See if I have it here. The receive window is a buffer. It is specified in bytes. During the 3 way handshake, each side tells the other it's buffer size. This is the start of our flow control. During the 3 way handshake, Each side also specifies

Re: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 11:09 PM 7/10/01, Michael L. Williams wrote: >You're correct, and I should be more careful with my terminology >segments are what TCP deals with I'm wondering how you could get away >with writing an RFC that doesn't specify something as critical as sending >ACKs =) Well, I think

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 01:29 PM 7/11/01, Ayers, Michael wrote: >OK I'm reposting because my original got cut off. >See if I have it here. >The receive window is a buffer. It is specified in bytes. During the 3 way >handshake, each side tells the other it's buffer size. This is the start of >our flow control. >Duri

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Ayers, Michael
OK, last try on my post The receive window is a buffer. It is specified in bytes. During the 3 way handshake, each side tells the other it's buffer size. This is the start of our flow control. During the 3 way handshake, Each side also specifies a sequence number. The other will reply with a

RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
dialup user. > >My $9.99 :) > > > -Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:53 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject:RE: TCP Ack [7:11703] > >At 01:29 PM 7/11/01, Ayers, Michael

RE: TCP/IP [7:15213]

2001-08-07 Thread Chuck Larrieu
after some of the messages that have crossed both this list and the CCIE list tonight, I have to ask: this is a joke, right? Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: TCP/IP [7:15213]

2001-08-08 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
Why - It is called software because it is. Explain - Cause you can't carry it in a bag like a piece of hardware. Think of how light your carry-on at the airport would be, if all you had in there was TCP/IP. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 9:45 PM Subject

Re: TCP/IP [7:15213]

2001-08-08 Thread Michael R. Eckhoff
Not quite true. TCP/IP CAN be done in silicon. However, it's not a good idea to do this. The reason being is that if you have a bug in your stack, you gotta toss the whole card. These are called Layer 3 network cards, and are being used in some cases to speed up some server stuff. Generall

Re: TCP/IP [7:15213]

2001-08-09 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
So does this card come with a preconfigured address. - Original Message - From: "Michael R. Eckhoff" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:09 PM Subject: Re: TCP/IP [7:15213] > Not quite true. > > TCP/IP CAN be done in silicon. However, it's not a good

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
Next time somebody uses that term why don't you ask them what they mean. And if they give you a everybody knows don't you answer, ask them what RFC that is. - Original Message - From: "Ouellette, Tim" To: Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:23 AM Subject: TCP TURN? [7:22083] > Does

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread Don Claybrook
Were there any Marketing types in these meetings? - Original Message - From: "Ouellette, Tim" To: Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:23 AM Subject: TCP TURN? [7:22083] > Does anyone know what a TCP Turn is? I've heard this mentioned on a couple > of conference calls i've been on lat

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread Farhan
again there will be 5000 responses 4 this qs i guess why dont u search b4 posting - Original Message - From: "Donald B Johnson jr" To: Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:35 PM Subject: Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083] > Next time somebody uses that term why don't you ask t

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; guess > > why dont u search b4 posting > - Original Message - > From: "Donald B Johnson jr" > To: > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:35 PM > Subject: Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083] > > > > Next time somebody uses that term why don't > you

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This topic seems to have taken a TCP Turn. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22187&t=22083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: TCP TURN? [7:22083]

2001-10-04 Thread td
Normally, it is associated with application response time measure. http://www.compuware.com/products/ecosystems/appexpert/detail.htm#tune Cheers TD ""Ouellette, Tim"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know what a TCP Turn is? I've heard this mentioned on

Re: TCP/IP [7:55687]

2002-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Mar 8, 3:14am, "Ghassan Majeed" wrote: } } From my little experience on the structure of TCP/IP , I draw the following } chart: } } HTTPSMTPFTPTelnet| TFTPDNSDHCPSNMP } | } TCP|UDP }

Re: TCP/IP [7:55687]

2002-10-16 Thread sam sneed
Looks good, I'd through in datalink layer between IP and NIC for a little more clarification Since IP can use so many different datalink protocols. Also for a little more understanindg you should also figure out where ICMP protocol goes since its so important in troubleshooting IP networks. ""Gh

O/T FYI re TCP cert

2001-01-30 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Juniper Networks Launches First Purpose-built Technical Certification Program for ISP Professionals Sunnyvale, CA - Jan. 30, 2001 - Juniper Networks, Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), a leading provider of Internet hardware and software systems, today announced the introduction of the Juniper Networks Tech

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-02 Thread Brant Stevens
You have to use NAT, but your firewall handles that, and translates your RFC 1918 address to one that is publically routable... What you need is an outside interface address from your partners' network, that translates to the RFC 1918 address on their network... Brant I. Stevens Internetwork Sol

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-03 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
> -Original Message- > From: Brant Stevens [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 7:59 PM > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: TCP/IP print through firewall > > You have to use NAT, but your firewall

Re: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-03 Thread NeoLink2000
Hi, I may be way, way off on this but I'll take a stab. If everybody that uses the printer sits on the 10.0.0.0 network (ie. 10.0.0.100 and 10.0.0.200) couldn't you change the printers default gateway to be the 10.0.0.0 network? That way it would send the replies back to that network and

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-03 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
 NEED A JOB ???   http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 2:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP/IP print through

Re: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-03 Thread Dennis
In addition to the public routable address on the printer, you need a routable address on the workstation. You can accomplish this with a static NAT translation on your firewall. Most likely, you currently have one public address for your entire network for browsing. Hopefully you have a spare

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-05 Thread Sudarshan NChari
Hi, I think, you would doing a NAT in this case and your packets to the printer would already be going as a public IP address. So the printer would be knowing where to send the responses back and you wont be needing another NAT. BRgds Sudarshan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-05 Thread Christopher Larson
ECTED] Subject: Re: TCP/IP print through firewall In addition to the public routable address on the printer, you need a routable address on the workstation. You can accomplish this with a static NAT translation on your firewall. Most likely, you currently have one public address for your entire ne

RE: TCP/IP print through firewall

2001-02-05 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
http://www.oledrews.com/job -Original Message- From: Christopher Larson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 1:05 PM To: 'Dennis'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP/IP print through firewall We print to remote printers a

Re: TCP Slow Start ? [7:9795]

2001-06-25 Thread John Danner
Correct me if I'm wrong but TCP Slow Start is that TCP starts sending slowly and increases it's transfer rate until it gets dropped packets. It is inherit to TCP and you always use it. You can kinda see this when you start a large download off the web. My ADSL connection starts at around 40 kb/s

Re: TCP Slow Start ? [7:9795]

2001-06-25 Thread Sam Sneed
TCP slow start is mandarory of all TCP implementations. It operates by observing the rate which acknowledgemenst are returned and injecting new packets into the network accordingly. It uses a congestion window on the senders side.It initializes this window to one segment when a new connection is

Re: TCP push Flag [7:9808]

2001-06-25 Thread Brian
Heres a Berkowitz reply from the last time you asked this. Remember that TCP only understands a byte stream, not the structure of application records within it. Brian is correct about one application for interactive traffic. Another might be if you had, let's say, 2000 byte application records,

Re: TCP Slow Start ? [7:9795]

2001-06-25 Thread Michael L. Williams
Well put, Sam. Below is a link to RFC 2001 that defines Slow Start, Congestion Avoidance, Fast Retransmit and Fast Recovery. Slow Start is indeed as described by Sam. However, it's important to note that, although Slow Start and Congestion Avoidance are separate algorithms with separate tasks,

Re: TCP/IP question [7:17343]

2001-08-27 Thread Ednilson Rosa
itz" To: Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 10:01 PM Subject: Re: TCP/IP question [7:17343] >there was a question regarding 127.0.0.1. I understand that the actual >TCP/IP "software" actually uses this address for self testing. >when ping localhost {or computer {netbios} name} th

Re: TCP/IP question [7:17343]

2001-08-27 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
ceived and the Link Layer address of the host or router from which the packet was received. > >- Original Message - >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >To: >Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 10:01 PM >Subject: Re: TCP/IP question [7:17343] > > >>there was a qu

Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread Patrick Ramsey
google returns all kinds of hits looks like novell or something.. http://www.google.com/search?q=tcp+port+280 mirror that port and trace what each packet contains You should also be looking at the source fo the packets. workstations? servers? printers? etc... Patrick Ramsey Sr. Ne

Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread James Haynes
According to snort.org it would be this: Port 280 / tcp Keyword http-mgmt Description Port 280 / udp Keyword http-mgmt Description -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IPSS ""Martin Roy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread Matthew Crane
Certainly I see it a lot when using the web based management software from Compaq & Novell. I also recall seeing mention of it in the well known ports lists as to do with http management, so that should givew you a place to start. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

RE: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
http-mgmt 280/tcphttp-mgmt http-mgmt 280/udphttp-mgmt # Adrian Pell # HTH Scott -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867

RE: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread Martin Roy
ement -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TCP port 280 [7:31867] Hi Martin, "The Well Known Ports are assigned by the IANA and on most systems can only be used by system (or root) pr

Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread MADMAN
I found this in /etc/services http-mgmt 280/tcp http-mgmt 280/udp Dave Martin Roy wrote: > > Can any one tell me which application is using port 280? I get several hits > on my access-list from port 280 but I cannot seem to narrow the source. > > Thanks > > Martin > > Martin

Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867]

2002-01-14 Thread CCIE Student
http based mngt on some hp printers. check out list of registered ports with IANA. http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers hope that helps. --- Martin Roy wrote: > Can any one tell me which application is using port > 280? I get several hits > on my access-list from port 280 but I cannot s

RE: TCP SYNSENT Timeout [7:66178]

2003-03-25 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Did you check the host requirements RFC, RFC 1122? I think it's OS-dependent though and not specified Priscilla John Neiberger wrote: > > One of our programmers is asking me about this and I really > don't have an answer. I've checked RFC 793 and haven't spotted > the answer yet. > > Is th

Re: TCP SYNSENT Timeout [7:66178]

2003-03-26 Thread Marc Thach Xuan Ky
I don't know any Java but standard UNIX sockets allow a non-blocking connect. Thus you don't care what the underlying stack is doing, you just time-out at the application layer. rgds Marc John Neiberger wrote: > > One of our programmers is asking me about this and I really don't have an > answer

RE: tcp reset problem [7:70521]

2003-06-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Scott Hoover wrote: > > Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new > build). We > are having a problem with the server immediately sending a > reset to clients > after receiving the syn. I bet there's a firewall on the server that's blocking access to the port. > Congestion

RE: tcp reset problem [7:70521]

2003-06-11 Thread Larry Letterman
Is it being load balanced or does it have 2 nics ? We just went thru this issue with a mail server and load balancing That had default gateway probs with two nics on separate subnets... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: tcp reset problem [7:70521]

2003-06-11 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Larry Letterman wrote: > > Is it being load balanced or does it have 2 nics ? > We just went thru this issue with a mail server and load > balancing > That had default gateway probs with two nics on separate > subnets... Default gateway problems caused it to send TCP resets? What happened to the

Re: TCP Push Bit [7:20396]

2001-09-19 Thread Peter Van Oene
Here is one of hundreds of links I got when i entered tcp push bit on google.com http://www.daemon.org/tcp.html *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 9/19/2001 at 10:34 AM Mr. Laughs wrote: >I need help finding out what the TCP Push bit is. Would you please help >me >with a source? > >T

Re: TCP & H.225 [7:21519]

2001-09-30 Thread Patrick Donlon
Matthew here's a little info on the ports used in h323: To set up a voice connection, the initiator starts a H.225 connection over TCP to the destination entity (normally the gatekeeper) at port number 1720. In this session a port number for the following H.245 connection is exchanged. The initi

Re: TCP & H.225 [7:21519]

2001-10-01 Thread Matthew Webster
Patrick, thanks for your help. Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21625&t=21519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol

RE: TCP & H.225 [7:21519]

2001-10-02 Thread Buri, Heather L.
According to the well-known port list http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers it is: h323hostcall 1720/TCP h323hostcall h323hostcall 1720/up h323hostcall Heather > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Webster [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, Septe

Re: TCP Window size [7:24875]

2001-10-31 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The window size has nothing to do with packet size. It sounds like you have misunderstood its purpose (which is for flow control). Priscilla At 07:25 PM 10/31/01, John Tafasi wrote: >Hi Group, > >I have a little but difficut question regarding TCP window size. How can the >tcp window size confi

Re: TCP Window size [7:24875]

2001-10-31 Thread Circusnuts
John- I believe you've let this term confuse you. What you are seeing with TCP windowing is how may packets you send before requiring an acknowledgement. This is better know as the sliding window principle, because consistent connections allow the window to open more freely (i.e. larger periods

Re: TCP Window size [7:24875]

2001-10-31 Thread John Tafasi
Here is an excerpt of what Mike Crane, author of the Cisco CID Exam Certification Guide from Cisco Press, is saying in his own words in this book, page 538: "Another adjustment is to increase the TCP window size to allow more outstanding requests. This command can also minimize packet fragmentati

Re: TCP Window size [7:24875]

2001-10-31 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 09:44 PM 10/31/01, John Tafasi wrote: >Here is an excerpt of what Mike Crane, author of the Cisco CID Exam >Certification >Guide from Cisco Press, is saying in his own words in this book, page 538: > >"Another adjustment is to increase the TCP window size to allow more >outstanding requests. W

Re: TCP Window size [7:24875]

2001-11-01 Thread John Tafasi
Thank you Priscilla. Now thing are quite clear. >From now on I have to look out for authors' mistakes. John Tafasi ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 09:44 PM 10/31/01, John Tafasi wrote: > >Here is an excerpt of what Mike Crane, author

RE: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
sam sneed wrote: > > Lets say we have host A 22.12.12.12 and host B 99.99.99.99. > Host B is a > server listening on port 3055. Host A connects to the server B > and sends > data. Now neither host A or B send anything to each other for > 1 hour. Is > the connection still there? Is there a timeo

Re: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-16 Thread sam sneed
Someone sent me this link which I think was helpful: http://www.sean.de/Solaris/soltune.html#common I will have to do more research. The problem I need to solve: My firewall keeps connections in its state table for 1 hour. So after one hour if you did a netstat on each host the connection appear

Re: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-16 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I think the RFC that say's keepalives must be at least 2 hours isn't very security conscious. What I mean is if you take a syn attack, it sets up connections and then never sends any data, holding the connection in a half-open state. I know there's a finite number of connections that a host can

RE: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me tell you about this experience I have with this and if someone could please explain it. I usually telnet into my mini-lab and open a session for each router and switch. I also have the "exec-timeout 0 0" command for the vty interfaces. So at night when I go to bed ... I put my W2K machine

Re: TCP timeout question [7:48934]

2002-07-17 Thread sam sneed
By default, most OS's will keep the sockets open. When you created a socket, you can include the SO_KEEPALIVE option. This will keep the socket open for tcp_keepalive_interval value of the OS, the defult is 2 hours on microsoft and Solaris sysems. If you do not use this socket options they will s

RE: TCP over IP [7:71556]

2003-06-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > Zsombor Papp wrote: > > > > As a side question, do you think that TCP must run over IP? :) > > I forgot to comment on that very important question! :-) > > I've never seen TCP run over anything other than IP, although > in theory it could. Has anyone seen TCP

RE: TCP over IP [7:71556]

2003-06-27 Thread Dom
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Has anyone seen TCP run over anything other than IP? I'm curious. IIRC, even Avian Carriers use IP > By the way, TCP was developed before IP. Most people assume the > opposite. At the time, TCP included most of IP's current > functionality. Then it was wisely de

  1   2   3   >