wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When using multipoint interface between R1 and R2, R3 receive these
routes:
>
> 192.168.255.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> O IA192.168.255.6 [110/64] via 192.168.23.1, 00:15:30, Serial0.132
> O IA192.168.255.5 [110/128] via
When using multipoint interface between R1 and R2, R3 receive these routes:
192.168.255.0/32 is subnetted, 2 subnets
O IA192.168.255.6 [110/64] via 192.168.23.1, 00:15:30, Serial0.132
O IA192.168.255.5 [110/128] via 192.168.23.1, 00:12:43, Serial0.132
When using point-to-point interfa
OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table
[7:60378]
> you may have discovered a new bug. lucky you!
>
> I just got through checking CCO TAC for known OSPF bugs in 12.2 code. There
> are a couple listed that relate to NSSA and a couple of others that relate
> to default routes,
At 12:24 AM + 1/6/03, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>you may have discovered a new bug. lucky you!
>
>I just got through checking CCO TAC for known OSPF bugs in 12.2 code. There
>are a couple listed that relate to NSSA and a couple of others that relate
>to default routes, but none of the li
problem solved.
> Don't know what is changed for nssa after 12.2, I tried encap ppp on
serial
> ports, and even cannot see any O*N2 entries.
>
> Thank you
> Wei
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, J
day, January 05, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: revisited: OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table
[7:60352]
> well, you got me. I haven't a clue as to why you are getting the result you
> describe.
>
> In my own setup, the routers in question are running 12.1.2d on the stub
>
and ip assigned
> point-to point is the Link Data info in LSA, is that which causes the
problem?
>
> Chuck, thank you very much for you help, BTW, can you give me your IOS
> version? (Hopefully I am not tired yet of another try)
>
> Wei
>
> - Original Message -
> F
;
To:
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: revisited: OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table
[7:60278]
> ""Wei Zhu"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi Chuck,
> > I tried point-to-point instead of f
ces
point-to-point? ) or artifact.
have you blown away the config, reloaded, then started from scratch? hate to
suggest the microsoft answer, but I am at a loss.
HTH
Chuck
> Thanks
> Wei
> - Original Message -
> From: "The Long and Winding Road"
> To:
> Sent:
riginal Message -
From: "The Long and Winding Road"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:59 PM
Subject: revisited: OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table entry
[7:60242]
> hope you don't mind me bringing this back public. I saw no other responses
> and I was curious so I
PM
Subject: Re: OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table entry [7:60088]
> Thank you Chuck. Finally it worked with totally stubby, but this time the
nssa didn't work, I tried several times, upgraded IOS to 12.2.13. Here I
gave some brief configuration, the interface configuration are
""Wei Zhu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The Router connections are as following, R1 has 1 frame relay circuit to
R2,
> R2 has 2 frame relay circuits to R3, R2 is the ABR, R1 in Area 0, and R3
in
> area 1.
>R1
>/
> /
> R2
> / /
>
of 2:
O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.1.33
Is that because of N2 type?
Also I tried to create metric-type 1 route on R1, and in R2 routing table, I
could see E1 entry, but in R3, still N2 entry, how can I redistribute N1
type to nssa?
Thanks
Wei
- Original Message -
From: Wei Zhu
The Router connections are as following, R1 has 1 frame relay circuit to R2,
R2 has 2 frame relay circuits to R3, R2 is the ABR, R1 in Area 0, and R3 in
area 1.
R1
/
/
R2
/ /
/ /
R3
On R1, there is a redistribute entry. The two ip address on R2 to R3 side
are 192.
t; Is there any router COMMAND that
> > indicate which route the IP trafic takes if there
> > is more than one route exist in the routing
> > table, other than the
> > "adminstrative_distance/Cost" pair that found
> > in the routing table.
> >
> >
As of now my router is showing 103009 routes and my
router is currently running 256mb DRAM . I believe
128mb will should also be sufficient full routes from
the internet
regards,
suaveguru
--- Tom Richs wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how big the Internet routing
> table is in terms
Tom,
I believe is more than 100,000 routesyou should have in your core router
at least 128(ram)
jb
-Original Message-
From: Tom Richs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/25/2001 10:50 AM
Subject: Internet routing table [7:21008]
Can anyone tell me how big the Internet routing table is in
Lots. Here is a snap shot off of MAE-East, 115K routes!!
BGP router identifier 165.117.1.52, local AS number 2548
BGP table version is 44054071, main routing table version 44054071
115974 network entries and 544402 paths using 30384054 bytes of memory
90775 BGP path attribute entries using
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet routing table [7:21008]
Can anyone tell me how big the Internet routing table is in terms of the
routes and the space of RAM necessary to store it. Also, if there's a link
to it I would appreciate a link to it. Thanks.
Tom
Message Posted at:
Can anyone tell me how big the Internet routing table is in terms of the
routes and the space of RAM necessary to store it. Also, if there's a link
to it I would appreciate a link to it. Thanks.
Tom
_
Get your FREE downlo
Yes, it is a loopback.
Thank you all so very much!
..RFC634
--- Jon Mitchell wrote:
> It is probably a loopback interface, right? OSPF
> advertises loopbacks as host routes. The network
> statement never dictates the size of the address
> space advertised, just which links are in t
Is this a Point-to-Multipoint interface? They don't advertise the subnet,
just the interface addresses. When you have point-to-multipoint interfaces
you'll just see a bunch of host routes in the table for all the routers on
that network.
"RFC Six Thirty Four" wrote:
> This is really bothering
This is really bothering me and I hope you can help,
When I advertise a route:
network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
The other OSPF routers display it in their routing
tables not as a /16 network, but show the actual IP
address of the interface followed by /32.
This bugs me, can anybody tell me
: An Experimental Methodology for Analysis of Growth in
the Global Routing Table
Author(s) : H. Berkowitz et al.
Filename: draft-berkowitz-tblgrow-00.txt
Pages : 5
Date: 16-Jul-01
Measurements [3,4,5] have shown
ot
of time.
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 13/06/2001
03:00 pm ---
"Circusnuts" @groupstudy.com on 12/06/2001 02:27:21 pm
Please respond to "Circusnuts"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Of
Bolton, Travis
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Routing Table Question [7:8103]
I saw a question that asked "what does the time value represent in a routing
table entry?" I didn't know if right off the top of my head but figur
I saw a question that asked "what does the time value represent in a routing
table entry?" I didn't know if right off the top of my head but figured it
out. I then thought that there would probably be more questions of this
type on the exam and should know what all the f
associated route.
-e-
Disclaimer: I never knew a router that was running version 8.3. The oldest
version I ever dealt with was 9.21 on a Cisco 3000 series router. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Bolton, Travis"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject: Routing Ta
> as to what every aspect of the routing table fields mean. I looked on the
> Cisco Web site but couldn't find what I was looking for. Thanks in
> advance...
>
> Regards,
>
> Travis Bolton
> Network Engineer II
> CCNA
Message Posted at:
http:/
This is kind of a tall order... I know what you are asking, but it's
somewhat rare that you would see a routing table with multiple routing
protocols. I mean, you may have BGP running over OSPF as an IGP (carrying
the routes internal), but the Show IP Route really means slightly diff
Team,
Can anybody provide me with a link to where I can find detailed descriptions
as to what every aspect of the routing table fields mean. I looked on the
Cisco Web site but couldn't find what I was looking for. Thanks in
advance...
Regards,
Travis Bolton
Network Engineer II
interface.
regards
Mike
""Ed Dombrowski"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Below is a routing table from a scenario i am working on. It is for OSPF
> over NBMA in Point-to-Point mode over subinterfaces. It is probably an
easy
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OSPF routing table explanation [7:4448]
>
>
> Below is a routing table from a scenario i am working on. It is for OSPF
> over NBMA in Point-to-Point mode over subinterfaces. It is
> probably an easy
> explanation but something i would like to be clea
Below is a routing table from a scenario i am working on. It is for OSPF
over NBMA in Point-to-Point mode over subinterfaces. It is probably an easy
explanation but something i would like to be clear on. My hub location is
the 2521 which is where this table is from. I have three routers connected
; Yongchul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck
> Larrieu
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Off Topic a bit - The IOnternet Routing Table [7:2360]
>
> The Bates repo
P router identifier 198.32.162.100, local AS number 6447
BGP table version is 8105935, main routing table version 8105935
130679 network entries and 3180699 paths using 126658311 bytes of memory
483414 BGP path attribute entries using 25137528 bytes of memory
390044 BGP AS-PATH entries using 9665388 bytes o
they
are getting ready to break up in near future?
Yongchul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck
Larrieu
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Off Topic a bit - The IOnternet Routing Table [7:2360]
The
Chuck
One IOS to forward them all.
One IOS to find them.
One IOS to summarize them all
And in the routing table bind them.
-JRR Chambers-
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2360&t=2360
--
FAQ, list archi
Basically, the MSFC card is just like a router.
You can "session" into the module.
Then show ip route summary.
Hope this help
Vincent Chong
""Hans Stout"" Hello colleagues,
>
> I have a Catalyst 6509 with an MSFC card, do you know if there is a
comma
Hello colleagues,
I have a Catalyst 6509 with an MSFC card, do you know if there is a command
to view the size of the routing table ? I need to know because I am planning
to add a fair amount of VLANs, and I want to make sure that the card can
handle it.
Thanks for your help in advance
>Hi,
>
>Does anyone have any good URLs/articles of rules and procedures to building
>the routing tables of RIP, IGRP (RIP and IGRP should be the same?) and OSPF?
>'Coz I am reading the routing tables of 2 routers running IGRP and I
>couldn't build the same routing tables as the routers did.
Hint
Hi,
Does anyone have any good URLs/articles of rules and procedures to building
the routing tables of RIP, IGRP (RIP and IGRP should be the same?) and OSPF?
'Coz I am reading the routing tables of 2 routers running IGRP and I
couldn't build the same routing tables as the routers did.
Your hel
I did not have a
specific
route for the 192.1.1.0 network, I did have a less specific route (ie 0.0.0.0)
configured.
Once I removed the default route, the 33.33.33.0 route was no longer in my routing
table.
Again, thanks to everyone for your input...
Scott Chapin
> Couple comments inser
it would work because the 192 net is reachable from router2. When
>you issue a 'no synchronization' you are saying that if this route is
>being announced to me via an IBGP peer, I will install it into the
>routing
>table regardless. Keep in mind it will go into the routing
&g
this route is
being announced to me via an IBGP peer, I will install it into the
routing
table regardless. Keep in mind it will go into the routing
table without any
knowledge of whether the next-hop address is reachable. You would need an
IGP or static routes to ensure that all next-hop
addresses ar
Hello all - I may have been working on this too long. Take a look
at the following network.
AS100 iBGP AS100
22.22.22.0 11.11.11.0
R2-173.4.175.19--173.4.175.17-R1http://www.group
that one can traceroute to a destination
> IP address A.B.C.D.
> however when you do a show ip route A.B.C.D it says
> the address is not
> on the routing table? I'm getting my routes from an
> ISP via OSPF which
> lists several routes learned from it as an OSP
sh ip route shows a routing table entry for a particular network (ie
192.168.1.0) as opposed to traceroute showing the hops to a destination
address (192.168.1.1).
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Deloso, Elmer
maybe it has been summarized...
-Original Message-
From: Deloso, Elmer G (WPNSTA Yorktown) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 3:41 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Routing table entries
Hi all.
Why is it that one can traceroute to a destination
Hi all.
Why is it that one can traceroute to a destination IP address A.B.C.D.
however when you do a show ip route A.B.C.D it says the address is not
on the routing table? I'm getting my routes from an ISP via OSPF which
lists several routes learned from it as an OSPF neighbor.
Comments a
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e the subnets as well then.
Hope that helps,
Darren
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, charles paver wrote:
> Hi. I am having problems understanding a simple routing table. For
> example, consider the following:
>
> 172.16.0.0/16 is subnetted, 2 subnets
>
> I 172.16.8.0 (etc)
&g
Hi. I am having problems understanding a simple routing table. For
example, consider the following:
172.16.0.0/16 is subnetted, 2 subnets
I 172.16.8.0 (etc)
What the heck is the 172.16.0.0 mean? Is that the final destination network
where the pdu is going? And how about the 2
Hi Folks,
Cisco keeps talking abou a way to provide Internet Access to MPLS VPN
customers by implementing a default route on a vrf to the global routing
table.
Unfortunately, I can't find any command doing just this ... anyone could
help on this ?
Another question is how the return packet
Thanks, really having technical good stuff
> -Original Message-
> From: Shabbir S. Talib [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 7:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brian Lodwick
> Subject: Re: need routing table tutorial
>
> check out
>
check out
http://www.hotlinks.com/members/sstalib/Tech_-_Network_Resources/
Brian Lodwick wrote:
>
> Group,
> Does anyone have a link to a site that has a good basic tutorial going
> over components in a Cisco router routing table? I have been trying to find
> one on Cisco&
Group,
Does anyone have a link to a site that has a good basic tutorial going
over components in a Cisco router routing table? I have been trying to find
one on Cisco's webpage and I can't find anything. I looked under everything.
Well maybe not everything. I would really apprecia
Title: RE: static route are in the routing table
When the next hop referenced can not be reached, the route will not show up in the routing table. This is the same for all routing protocols, whether it's static or dynamic.
HTH,
Rog
> -Original Message-
> From: new
197.70.32.13.
"Lists Wizard" wrote in message
<00f001c04eb9$ebf21100$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Router-12#sh ru
>Building configuration...
>
>I have create six static routes, only three of them would appear in the
>routing table. Why
>
>Router-12# sh ru
>
>version
Hi,
Before the static route goes into the main routing table, the router will
check is the next hop or the interface is reachable/available. If your next
hop is not available, such as serial interface down, the static route will
not go into the routing table.
Thanks,
At 08:13 PM 11/14/2000
It is not necessary to redistribute static routes into a routing protocol in
order for statics to appear in the routing table. They will show up as "S"
in the table IF there is a route available.
You do NOT need to have a routing protocol enabled in order to route.
Routing can be don
27;; Lists Wizard; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
how about creating an access list..
then adding this access list to a route map.
Regards,
Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EM
ru
>Buildingconfiguration...
>
>I have create six static routes, only three of them would appear in the
>routing table. Why
>
>Router-12# sh ru
>
>version 11.2
>
>!
>ip classless
>ip route 10.0.0.0255.0.0.0 179.70.32.
Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:10 PM
To: Jason Baker; 'Cisco group study'
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
Can you provide and example? I'm a bit confused as to what this
accomplishes.
'
Subject:RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
how about creating an access list..
then adding this access list to a route map.
Regards,
Jason Baker
Network Engineer
MCSE, CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, Nov
Router-12#shru
Buildingconfiguration...
I have create six static routes, only three of them would appear in the
routing table. Why
Router-12# sh ru
version 11.2
!
ip classless
ip route 10.0.0.0255.0.0.0 179.70.32.13
ip route 10.10.11.0
7;
Subject: RE: Static route does not appear in routing table
If I were to guess I would say it is because there is no 179.70.32.13
network
Your directly connected networks are 170.something. there are no other
routes known to the router. Therefore it says "I got no idea where this
destina
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 7:14 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cisco group study';
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:Static route does not appear in routing table
>
>I configured static ip route but i will not appear in the ip routing table.
Or something like that.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Lists Wizard
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 7:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cisco group study';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Static route does no
I configured static ip route but i will not appear in the ip routing table.
Below is the output of some commands.
Can some one explain this?
Thanks
Lists Wizard
Router-12(config)#ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 179.70.32.13
Router-12
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:
> > i have a question about the bgp routing table.
> >
> > lab scenario:
> > router A is a "branch" type router providing access to the network. router
> > A is running bgp with router B, the "gate
Sean,
I would assume that R3 also has two BGP routes to R2, but does not have an
entry in the routing table either.
Step 1 of the BGP decision process is to ignore routes with an
inaccessible next hop.
Make sure that R4 knows how to reach the interface(s) advertising the
networks that R1 is
GP between R1/R2, R2/R4, R1/R3
> Everything else looks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3 and
> R2/R4
> But R3 can see R2 in routing table and BGP table, while
> R4 doesn't see R1's ip in ip routing table, but it does see R1 in BGP table
> via two di
R1
> AS2: R2
> AS3: R3+R4
> IBGP between R3 and R4, EBGP between R1/R2, R2/R4, R1/R3
> Everything else looks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3 and
> R2/R4
> But R3 can see R2 in routing table and BGP table, while
> R4 doesn't see R1's ip in ip rou
> i have a question about the bgp routing table.
>
> lab scenario:
> router A is a "branch" type router providing access to the network. router
> A is running bgp with router B, the "gateway" or "border" router to the
> network. i have router
> > v v
> > R3 <---> R4
> >
> > AS1: R1
> > AS2: R2
> > AS3: R3+R4
> > IBGP between R3 and R4, EBGP between R1/R2, R2/R4, R1/R3
> > Everything else looks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3
and
> > R2/R4
> >
> AS1: R1
> AS2: R2
> AS3: R3+R4
> IBGP between R3 and R4, EBGP between R1/R2, R2/R4, R1/R3
> Everything else looks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3 and
> R2/R4
> But R3 can see R2 in routing table and BGP table, while
> R4 doesn't see R1's ip in ip routin
een R3 and R4, EBGP between R1/R2, R2/R4, R1/R3
> Everything else looks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3 and
> R2/R4
> But R3 can see R2 in routing table and BGP table, while
> R4 doesn't see R1's ip in ip routing table, but it does see R1 in BGP
table
> via t
ks fine, and almost symetric configuration on R1/R3 and
R2/R4
But R3 can see R2 in routing table and BGP table, while
R4 doesn't see R1's ip in ip routing table, but it does see R1 in BGP table
via two different paths
Any idea?
Thanks,
Sean
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. F
used in the IP
routing table. BGP first check if route to NEXT_HOP is in the local IP
routing table.(sync enabled, ext..)
Then what? Does it first look what the next hop ip address is in the IP
routing table and use this IP for the routing table entry, OR does it add
the IP routing table entry with
How does the Routing table being organized? Using the same network
diagram but with different set of routers, the order of the routing
table changes. Is there a particular way to order the "show ip route"
routing table? (For example, for "show ip bgp", the bgp table i
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Frank Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 3:06 PM
Subject: where is routing table located in the router?
> An article said the routing table is located in RAM.
> I got a littl
Interesting question.
Yes the routing table is dynamically built by routing protocols.
There are also static routing entries if you created in your
configuration file. Locally connected active networks will be
entered into the routing table immediately after the reset.
If the question goes to
dynamic in nature. As
to the power cycle, it takes longer for the router to
come up than to learn the routes it needs to
communicate.
William Swedberg CCNP CCDP
--- Frank Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An article said the routing table is located in RAM.
> I got a little puzzl
>An article said the routing table is located in RAM.
Correct.
>I got a little puzzled ,cause if the router is powered off by accident,
>will the table get lost totally?
Yes, with the caveat that static routes are an _input_ to the routing table.
>If the router is a backbone o
RAM is correct, because the routing table needs to be rebuilt if the router is powered
of & on (from connected interfaces, static routes, & learned routes from whatever
routing protocol(s)you're running).
>>> "Frank Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/14/00 0
An article said the routing table is located in RAM.
I got a little puzzled ,cause if the router is powered off by accident,
will the table get lost totally?
If the router is a backbone one,the table should be very big ,so after
the power cycle ,the router has to attain all the routes once again
It is only constrained by the routers memory.
"jun young,kwon" wrote:
> HI all.
> This is jun young, kwon in korea.
> i want to know the maximum routing table entries that cisco 7513 and cisco
> 12012 can have.
> i have gone to do web-surfing for the materials.
> b
HI all!
This is KORNET NOC in KOREA.
i want to know the maximum routing table entries that cisco 7513 and cisco
12012 can have.
i have gone to do web-surfing for the materials.
but i can't find it.
i wish anyone informs me of my question.
for example,
If router has a 64M DRAM, how many ro
The only limitation is the amount of vailable memory
in the router .
flem
--- "jun young,kwon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI all.
> This is jun young, kwon in korea.
> i want to know the maximum routing table entries
> that cisco 7513 and cisco
> 12012 can have.
HI all.
This is jun young, kwon in korea.
i want to know the maximum routing table entries that cisco 7513 and cisco
12012 can have.
i have gone to do web-surfing for the materials.
but i can't find it.
i wish anyone informs me of my que
91 matches
Mail list logo
