Dear all,
I have a stupid question, want to clarify.
is it I cannot make two or more interfaces share the same subnet in
the Router?
Thanks
Best Regards,
rick
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Can I plug a PC directly from the NIC to the ethernet port on a 2500 series
router?
It won't work for me. Router doesn't recognize a link directly to the PC
but it does
when plugged into a switch. I assume it's a straight vs. crossover thing
but from
what I was told, you only need a crossover
This is a truly stupid question, and I'm s looking forward to getting
flamed, but.
A friend and I were talking about the CCIE and I mentioned that you use to
get a Cisco leather jacket when you finally passed the CCIE lab. Do they
still do that, or I just having some kind of reacti
i can't even believe i have run into this, but getting into my new 2509 for
the first time. in the past i have always telnetted into routers using the
ip address. how do i get in on the console port? is it hyperterminal?...
detailed explanation would be really appreciated, i am feeling dumb ton
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
Otherwise routing would not work. If you're bridging, then the bridged
interfaces are in the same subnet but you don't speci
te in message
sac446f2.062@fsutil01">news:sac446f2.062@fsutil01...
> This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
> you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
> Otherwise routing would not work. If you're bridging
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
sac446f2.062@fsutil01">news:sac446f2.062@fsutil01...
> This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
> you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
> Otherwise routing
uot;"John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
sac446f2.062@fsutil01">news:sac446f2.062@fsutil01...
> This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make.
If
> you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its ow
when or why would you be
>required to set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
>
>Thx.
>
>Wang Chia Ta
>Systems Support
>Mitsubishi Motors
>---
>
>
>""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
&g
IL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> Dear all,
> I have a stupid question, want to clarify.
> is it I cannot make two or more interfaces share the same subnet in
> the Router?
> Thanks
> Best Regards,
> rick
&g
ion is when or why would you
> be
> required
> to use set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
>
> Thx.
>
> Wang Chia Ta
> Systems Support
> Mitsubishi Motors
> ---
>
> ""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid question
>Date: 30 Mar 2001 10:50:28 PST
>
>"John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
> > not appli
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
> This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
> you are routing, each interface on the router must be in it
ver.
>
>But ethernet interfaces cannot share a subnet.
>
>Kevin Wigle
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
>Subject
> >But ethernet interfaces cannot share a subnet.
> >
> >Kevin Wigle
> >
> >----- Original Message -
> >From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
L PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid question
>Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:29:36 -0500
>
>I'll be quite honest and say I haven't done a detailed investigation
>of the IOS implementation restrictions here. My intuition would be
>that IOS has one ARP ca
>The limit on Cisco routers is 4 Serials in the same subnet... but my
>question is:
>
>What problem does that solve? Why would I want/need to do that?
My gut tells me that this is not really a planned-for limit, and sort
of happened.
>
>Any thoughts?
As a wild guess, it might be to allow the
, but you can if you want to - only on SERIAL interfaces...
>
> Z
>
>
>
>
> >From: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >CC: [EMAI
. Why would you need to do
this?
> I
> > dunno, but you can if you want to - only on SERIAL interfaces...
> >
> > Z
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
Any 10BaseT type Ethernet connection between any two devices without the use
of a hub requires a crossover cable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid question
---Original Message-
> From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 10:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Stupid question..
>
>
> Can I plug a PC directly from the NIC to the ethernet port on
> a 2500 series
> router?
> It won't w
o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 5:33 PM
Subject: Stupid question..
> Can I plug a PC directly from the NIC to the
ethernet port on a 2500 series > router?> It won't work for
me. Router doesn't recognize a link directly to the PC > but it
does>
Where I work, "Data Technician" is the entry-level title for my group, while
Network Analyst is the more senior position. The sys admin title doesn't
exist here, as system administration duties are divided among the LAN
support personnel and LAN analysts.
> hmmm.. from my somewhat limited knowl
the router should come with a manual on what to do,
but if you dont have it do this:
plug the light blue console cable into the port
marked "console" on the back of the router
plug the other end of the console cable into your
serial port on your computer
use hyperterminal and connect at
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Quinton Maynard
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: stupid question
i can't even believe i have run into this, but getting into my new 2509 for
the first time. in the past i have always telnetted into ro
The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
make a regular 8 conductor straight thru cable. But you will have to end up
using rj45 to db9/db25 adapter (cisco's or the one with compatible pinout).
Kumar Dasari
"Quinton Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[E
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Sadguna Kumar Dasari
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: stupid question
>
>
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cab
the console cable needs to be a rollover cable
-Joe-
"Sadguna Kumar Dasari" wrote in message
8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
> make a regular 8 conductor straight thru cable. But you
://www.techperks.com - Your Online Certification Forum!
>From: "JoeFerg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "JoeFerg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: stupid question
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:43:54 -0400
>
>the console cabl
Yes, the console cable need to be rollover cable. Sorry for the oversight.
Sadguna Kumar Dasari
""Sadguna Kumar Dasari"" wrote in message
8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
> make a regu
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 10:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: stupid question
>
>
> i can't even believe i have run into this, but getting into
> my new 2509 for
> the first time. in the past i have always telnetted into
> routers using the
> ip add
What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown? Just
flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me.
Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA
Network Engineer - Anda Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN IM - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32
I was trying to find some information on the 2926G switch (I'm not overly
familiar with the whole Cisco product line so bear with me) and ran across
this
document:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca2926.htm
Is the 2926G and old switch and EOL = End of Life? Just wondering
Patri
]] On Behalf Of
Richard Tufaro
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid Question [7:32591]
What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but shutdown?
Just
flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me.
Richard Tufaro - MCSE - GSEC- CCNA
Network Engineer -
That leads me to a related question...
would it be better for my stack of 2500's and Cat switches to leave
them on, or should I shut them off when not used. This is a lab setup.
Jeff
""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What is the proper
Flipping the switch is it... I always think of its file system as it is
"in the flash" not as vulnerable as a hard drive... we just unplug
hubs/switches/routers... Thank goodness to. Can you imagine routers
getting as pissed off as NT boxes when "improperly" shut down... we
be going n
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft and nothing will get
corrupted!!!
-Serge.
Richard Tufaro wrote:
>
> What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but
> shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me.
>
> Richard T
Assuming you want to save the config on there, a wr mem before the power
off may be appropriate, unless you're selling it, then maybe a wr erase.
Bri
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Mnatzakanian Serge wrote:
> Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
>
> Fortunately the IOS was not writte
ave no meaning other
than for slander.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by M
gt;it is and I wouldn't be surprised if an AIX or SGI box did the same.
>DB Server or not.
>
>Sorry... just gotta love those MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
>than for slander.
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rprised if an AIX or SGI box did the same.
> >DB Server or not.
> >
> >Sorry... just gotta love those MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
> >than for slander.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> &g
onday, January 21, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Mark Odette II
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Reason being that NTFS is a journalled file system. Not sure on
NT 3.51's version of NTFS, but if you say so, probably true. (not meant to
be sarcastic, but sincere)
ed...
Hope this helps,
Aki
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ?e?t??a, 21 ?a???a 2002 8:42 55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft an
According to the cisco logo usage guidelines, which must be accepted
before such use of a logo, it says that only the highest achieved cisco
logo should be used in marketing materials, now if I am a CCNP and a
CCDP
which would take presidence ?
now there is a can of worms...
___
All, im studying for my CCIE. Can someone point me in the direction of
information about RIF's..I've got the Rossi Paper but its unclear at the
start.
Am I right in saying, a RIF is a Routing Information Field, its used to
determine the list of rings and bridges a frame has travelled through a
to
Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:46 PM
Subject: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
> I was trying to find some information on the 2926G switch (I'm not overly
> familiar with the whole Cisco product line so bear with me) and ran across
> this
> document
cc:
Subject: Re: Stup
11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
> Doh boy! I feel really dumb now, I didn't realize the 5000's had been
EOL'd
> too!
> I really HAVE to start getting out more often! :)
>
> Thanks for the info,
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Allister/SOC/WGL@WGL
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid qu
Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "EA Louie" on 04/16/2001 03:23:27 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Patrick McAllister/SOC/WGL@WGL
>
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
>
>
>
Is it possible to set up NAT on a router for DSL, allowing the DSL side
connection to receive a DHCP generated address??
I have been running 2000 server Nat, and using my DSL connection with no
problems, but would like to remove the server interface completely...
Message Posted at:
http://www
I think since those are two different tracks, you can use both/either with no problem.
You just couldn't use the CCIE logo, say, if you had passed the written but not the
lab yet - you just haven't earned it yet, baby.
Sincerely,
Bradley J. Wilson
CCNA, CCDA, MCSE, CCSE, CNX-A, MCT, CTT
Davi
I say the same thing. With CCDP you can't claim the CCNP and with CCNP you can't claim
CCDP since I believe they differ due to one test. Both should be good. I just hate
those CCNP guys who put: "CCNA, CCNP"...It is only
obvious...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think since those are two dif
I put together a document on RIFs that you can grab for free from
www.laganiere.net
Let me know if that helps...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Keen"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:47 PM
Subject: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
> All, im studying for
Champ , cheers
What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them all?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41563&t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
nderpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
Shawn K.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> Champ
ave a job right now, though!
>
> Shawn K.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
> >
> > Champ ,
7;Kaminski, Shawn G'
> Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> what are the other options that are as good as Boson and cheaper?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:06 AM
&g
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
> (like toggling the "score meter", showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
> WITH references to published explanations of
a
> > little before rushing out to buy the "almighty overpriced" Boson.
> >
> > Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
> > underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
> >
> > Shawn K.
> >
>
work Learning.
>
> Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working on
> stuff for Network Learning
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
> > To: [EMA
ssage board. Also, I
don't work for Network Learning, I work for EDS.
Shawn K.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
&
Comments inline
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
> I didn't just "pop into the group".
I must admit that my phrasing ("pop into the group") probably sounded
negative, but I can assure you that I in no way meant it to be so.
> I'm just
> trying to let people know that there are other alternatives
>
no 1 source for any exam. I have heard the term, "you get what
you pay for".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Everybody else is bad except N
/CCIE.
-Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
I have an un-bias opinion. For some of us who have already done a few
exams, Boson i
The cheap way to do this is with a $99.00 LinkSys router/firewall.
-Original Message-
From: Guy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Probobly a stupid question [7:14273]
Is it possible to set up NAT on a router for
You mean 2000 servers accessing the internet via dynamic nat? Or you have
2000 static translations inbound? And when you say "server interface" do
you mean the ethernet interface on the router that the servers are beihind?
Set up maybe like a DMZ?
I mean, you can certainly set up your DSL conn
01 06:23PM >>>
The cheap way to do this is with a $99.00 LinkSys router/firewall.
-Original Message-
From: Guy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Probobly a stupid question [7:14273]
Is it possible to set up
: Re: Probobly a stupid question [7:14273]
You mean 2000 servers accessing the internet via dynamic nat? Or you have
2000 static translations inbound? And when you say "server interface" do
you mean the ethernet interface on the router that the servers are beihind?
Set up maybe
om: Guy Russell
To:
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Probobly a stupid question [7:14273]
> I currently run NAT on a 2000 Server...
>
> One interface is using an auto ip address that is received from the ISP...
> The other Nic, is linked to my switch and to my route
Check this site out, everything you want to know.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/default.html
-Original Message-
From: Matt C. Lange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Jeff Martinez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:a stupid
]
Subject: a stupid question but need an answer!!
What is the difference between these commands?
ip default-gateway
ip default-network
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Why would you use one over the other?
Thanks
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http
- Original Message -
From: Matt C. Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeff Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 12:44 PM
Subject: a stupid question but need an answer!!
>
>
> What is the difference between these comma
Let me preface this with a big "I think that ...
ip default-gateway X.x.x.x
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.x.x.x <-- Not compatible with IGRP.
Both set a next-hop address of X.x.x.x for destinations that do not have a
route in the routing table. By default, these routes are redistributed with
wha
Why is nothing redistributed with the below config
router eigrp 1
redistribute ospf 1 route-map o2e
passive-interface Serial0
network 131.10.0.0
network 192.168.0.0
no auto-summary
!
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 1 route-map e2o
network 131.10.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 131.10.3.1 0.0
I would say you need to set your default metric for EIGRP or it will default
to 0, which will not be redistributed (at least for _into_ EIGRP, I'm not
sure about out of EIGRP).
---JRE---
""Phill Jolliffe"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
001501c02247$ca9af830$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:00150
Roman,
Just buy a cheap 5 port hub for this. That will work. PC to hub, and hub
to router. Also, you dont need a PC to check if ether will get through the
link. Just create a ping on router A, and when it asks for the source, put
the address for etherO. For example:
RouterA#ping
IP ad
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little experiment. You
know...fix it
up, tear it down, fix it up, tear it down - ad nauseum. Anyway - it goes
something
like this. I have a Linksys (I know...don't say it) Broadband
Router/Switch that
my internal LAN accesses the internet through
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little experiment. You
know...fix it
up, tear it down, fix it up, tear it down - ad nauseum. Anyway - it goes
something
like this. I have a Linksys (I know...don't say it) Broadband
Router/Switch that
my internal LAN accesses the internet through
If your running frame relay did you remember to encapsulate the link with
IETF. You know this is used for a Cisco router connecting to a non Cisco
router, just a thought.
Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a
Rolls
The frame-relay portion is only between the two cisco routers. The linksys
router is tied to the e0 port of one of them. Actually, I have that linksys
router/switch functioning only as a gateway/switch. It does no routing per se.
Just shoves everything not local out the WAN port and that's abou
Did you Define sub interface function in S0,
Ade,
-Original Message-
From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question...(no questions are stupid friend)
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little
>
> This is a truly stupid question, and I'm s looking forward to getting
> flamed, but.
>
> A friend and I were talking about the CCIE and I mentioned that you use to
> get a Cisco leather jacket when you finally passed the CCIE lab. Do they
> still do that, o
83 matches
Mail list logo
