johnman johnman wrote:
> Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
>
> Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
> on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
No you don't (have a couple of VLANs, some with ISL and others with 802.1q).
The trunking protocol is not an attribute of a VLAN, it is an attribute of a
physical (trunking) port. You have some VLANs, put them on whatever trunk
port you desire.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation
johnman johnman wrote:
> Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
>
> Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
> on my 2620 router ?
VLANs don't run trunk encapsulations, trunks do so I don't understand
your question. The trunk encap is how
No you don't (have a couple of VLANs, some with ISL and others with 802.1q).
The trunking protocol is not an attribute of a VLAN, it is an attribute of a
physical (trunking) port. You have some VLANs, put them on whatever trunk
port you desire.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation
Have couple of VLAN some with ISL and other with 802.1Q.
Can I trunk all of them (ISL and 802.1Q) on one physical fastethernet
on my 2620 router ?
_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 1:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Trunking ISl and 802.1q [7:74059]
>
> How much or how did you pick up a 3550? I thought they were so expensive?
> Please do tell...
> **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Stor
How much or how did you pick up a 3550? I thought they were so expensive?
Please do tell...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74066&t=74059
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http
Hello,
Kind of confused on switch types and trunking.
Do I understand correctly that WS-c2950X can not do ISL?
And that WS-C2912-XL-EN can?
Can 19xx do ISL or 802.1q?
I am going of this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk390/technologies_configuration_examp
le09186a00800949fd.shtml
Can
1q is supported by Cisco on FastEthernet and
> GigabitEthernet, and not
> on
> > Ethernet. Check out:
>
> moving to a new computer, and can't locate the beginning of
> this thread.
> sorry if this was covered previously.
>
> the 2610 and 11 will support dot1q tr
This is very interesting. The URL that I posted earlier:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_config
uration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca801.html#xtocid18
is for IOS 12.2 Mainline.
>From the original message posted you can see that it is really ethernet
ports the guy i
red previously.
the 2610 and 11 will support dot1q trunking on the built in 10baseT ethernet
ports. I believe this startrd with one of the earlier 12.1 IOS images.
I also have done dot1q trunking of NM ethernet modules, both on the 36xx
and 26xx platforms, again with an appropriate IOS image.
If
Hi,
802.1q is supported by Cisco on FastEthernet and GigabitEthernet, and not on
Ethernet. Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800ca801.html#xtocid18
ISL is supported by Cisco on Ethernet, FastEthernet and GigabitEthernet.
ender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De:CCIEwaNNaB [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 19 de junho de 2003 00:08
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sulation dot1Q 20
ip address 153.1.20.1 255.255.255.0
Also I cleared all the Vlans on the switch side of the trunk, except for
Vlans 1,4,13,20,1001-1005 and trunking is set to on.
Thanks for your help..
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
Hi Grant,
Thanks.
That is very useful because I was really getting mixed - just the state of
mind I should not be in as I prepare for BCMSN 640-604 next week.
That is very useful, believe me.
Cheers!
Mwalie
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70708&t=70700
--
Hi, Mwalie
yes, the trunk link can be established even if between different VTP domain,
the following is the detailed explaination.
A trunk link can be negotiated between two switches only if both switches
belong to the same VLAN Trunking Protocol
Hi All,
Here is a question, please.
Accidentally two switches are connected together that are in different
management domains. If both sides of the link have their trunking states set
to on, what will the link do?
I thought there will be no trunking, but the answer says they will trunk -
even
ACL's should still work on the router. It will treat a vlan
interface similarly just like a regular L3 interface.
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: "Skarphedinsson Arni V."
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 8:47 AM
Subject
No, subinterfaces on a trunked port fully support acl's in the same
manner as physical interfaces. Same for other services such as NAT,
CBAC, policy routing, etc.
HTH,
Kent
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 11:47, Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
> Hi
>
> When using vlan trunking from a route
Hi
When using vlan trunking from a router, for example in a router on a stick
enviroment, I would create subinterfaces on the ethernet interface on the
router, does that in some way limit the use of access-lista to controle
traffic, like traffic between the vlans and out of the router through
A native VLAN is the VLAN that that port uses when trunking breaks down.
Thats it. If you don't set it to a specific VLAN in the config, then the
native VLAN will be the default vlan. On cisco, this is VLAN 1.
Normally, the trunk is up and running and the native vlan doesn't come
Native VLAN is the vlan which is is "untagged" with VLAN information or
tags. IE, by default, VLAN 1 is untagged, meaning other devices which do not
understand vlan's, can understand traffic from a vlan 1 port (for example).
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63354&t
I'm confused on native vlan and trunking. Can I assign a port to a trunk
(for all the vlans), then assign that port to a vlan100? Does that port
belong to native vlan100? What means native vlan? Thanks. Yoshi
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6330
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> I'm attempting to configure trunking on a C2924-XL switch runiing IOS
> version Version 11.2(8.10)SA6 from file c2900XL-hs-mz-112.8.10 SA6.bin.
I've
> read CCO enough to realize that the command under interface configuration
> mod
Richard,
Trunking is only supported in the enterprise image release. You do not
have that image
>From: "Richard Burdette" >Reply-To: "Richard Burdette" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Trunking on C2924-XL [7:62881] >Date: Wed,
12 Feb 2003 16:41:19 GMT
Hello All,
I'm attempting to configure trunking on a C2924-XL switch runiing IOS
version Version 11.2(8.10)SA6 from file c2900XL-hs-mz-112.8.10-SA6.bin.
I've read CCO enough to realize that the command under interface
configuration mode would be "switchport mode trunk". Howe
Hello All,
I'm attempting to configure trunking on a C2924-XL switch runiing IOS
version Version 11.2(8.10)SA6 from file c2900XL-hs-mz-112.8.10 SA6.bin. I've
read CCO enough to realize that the command under interface configuration
mode would be "switchport mode trunk". Howe
addition 2 flat networks with no intervlan routing,
and no trunking involved anywhere in the network. All people in the data
vlan 1, pipe into regular switch ports with uplink to a cat 6006,
connected to a 3640 that only has main interface routing the vlan 1
layer 3 subnet across the WAN. The dhcp
Anyone have any insight on the pro's or con's regarding applying trunks to
all 10/100 access ports on a 6509. Presently, I have a cisco voIP
environment - using a data vlan and an auxiliary vlan for voice traffic.
I've been asked to make an avaya phone work in this environment. Input from
Avaya
ss, just
> vlans and HSRP seperately. But in this lab we have Vlans
> running thru HSRP router doing ISL trunking and the routers are
> also running BGP and EIGRP to connect to a remote router. AHHH!
>
> Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
;
To: "Chuck Church"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: hsrp & isl trunking [7:58144]
> And..
> on the new msfc-2 you only get 16 hsrp groups
> supposedly the issue that chuck states below is
> not an issue with the new msfc-2 for
And..
on the new msfc-2 you only get 16 hsrp groups
supposedly the issue that chuck states below is
not an issue with the new msfc-2 for the 6509's
Chuck Church wrote:
>Dennis,
>
>It's better to have a unique HSRP group for each VLAN. Cisco bases the
>virtual MAC address
Dennis,
It's better to have a unique HSRP group for each VLAN. Cisco bases the
virtual MAC address on the group. If you reuse the group number, you'll have
duplicate MAC addresses. Granted, they're on seperate VLANs and shouldn't
matter, but I had a Cat4000 that didn't like it at all, and g
HSRP router doing ISL
trunking and the routers are also running BGP and EIGRP to connect to a
remote router. AHHH!
Thanks for your help.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58138&t=57896
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Your instructor is right. We have a pretty big Vlanned network (3000
nodes). The only way for the traffic originating from one subnet to get to
another subnet is to go through a router. Therefore, each Vlan (or subnet)
needs an individual gateway (router) to get to other subnets. That is why
Come on, anyone??
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58093&t=57896
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECT
In my Cisco Academy class, we are doing an lab with a lot of different
topics rolled into one lab. We have 2 routers set up with hsrp and has a
virtual ip address. Now a 4000 switch has 4 vlans configured on it and to
use isl trunking to the hsrp routers. These routers have 4 subinterfaces on
the
y on the router won't work
on switch 2, even though all the links are set up for trunking. I've
tried forcing this situation with allowed vlan configs and so forth, and
its just a pain in the you-know-what. It seems less of a hassle with the
most recent code, but I never go in and offer
ot, I
will jump back in.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Kris Waters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 802.1q trunking [7:57772]
Everyone,
Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up y
""Kris Waters"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Everyone,
>
> Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years
ago
> with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of
reasons
> and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X schem
Everyone,
Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago
with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons
and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on
a gradual basis.
My building contains the following equip
dot1q on ethernet was added in IOS 12.0(1)T and the
native keyword was added in 12.1(3)T. Before that, had
to put the native VLAN cfg on the main/physical
interface.
--- Doug Oh wrote:
> On the 2611 platform, VLAN encapsulation is
> supported for Ethernet as of
> 12.1. Bridging on a subinterface
On the 2611 platform, VLAN encapsulation is supported for Ethernet as of
12.1. Bridging on a subinterface is not supported until 12.2, however.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57547&t=57539
--
FAQ, list archives, an
- Original Message -
From: "pauldongso"
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: trunking over ethernet [7:57539]
Hi Paul,
> Does ethernet interface support trunking? (isl and dot1.q, or just one
> of those)?
> The reason for asking is all the doco i
Does ethernet interface support trunking? (isl and dot1.q, or just one
of those)?
The reason for asking is all the doco i ever read only say "cisco
supports trunking on both fast ethernet and gigabit ethernet switch
links, as well as aggregated fast ang gigabit etherchannel links"
S
AM
Subject: Re: 802.1Q trunking on 2500?? [7:56690]
> There is a good tool here:
> http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/CompNav/Index.pl?Introduction=True
>
> Use "Search by Features"
> and choice 2500 product family
> In avialible features,
> no "IEEE 802.1Q vl
Nop,
Having a FastEthernet interface is a "must have" for what you are doing.
Regards,
Bruno Fernandes
""cer"" wrote in message
news:...
> Hi, all,
>
> Can the 2500 series support 802.1Q? If so, what IOS version and
> feature set would be needed?
>
> I want to create some logical subinterfa
at on a 10M interface.
> > Has to be a fast ethernet
> > interface.
> >
> > Connie
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cer [mailto:ciscoriley@;hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:16 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Has to be a fast ethernet
> interface.
>
> Connie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cer [mailto:ciscoriley@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 802.1Q trunking on 2500?? [7:56690]
>
>
> Hi, all,
I have a couple of 2500's running 12.1(15) enterprize code, and they still
do not allow for encapsulation on Ethernet interfaces. According to the
documentation, encapsulation is supported only on FE interfaces. I have
heard that the 2610s support it, however. Anyone else have additional
informa
James,
Is that doable on a 2500 series router? Basically, I want to configure
something like this:
Switch has
VLAN 10
VLAN 20
VLAN 30
I want to set up 802.1Q trunking between the switch and 2500 such that:
VLAN10 goes to Ethernet 0.10
VLAN20 goes to Ethernet 0.20
VLAN30 goes to Ethernet 0.30
Hi,
I made a mistake making that statement. With the new IOS codes, 12.x, you can
create subinterfaces. :-O
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Connie Nie [mailto:CNie@;EPLUS.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 802.1Q trunking on 2500?? [7:56690
I don't think you can do that on a 10M interface. Has to be a fast ethernet
interface.
Connie
-Original Message-
From: cer [mailto:ciscoriley@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 802.1Q trunking on 2500?? [7:56690]
Hi, all,
Can the
Hi, all,
Can the 2500 series support 802.1Q? If so, what IOS version and feature set
would be needed?
I want to create some logical subinterfaces on the 2500 that correpond to
VLANs, as a way of segmenting traffic.
TIA,
Charles
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
The lowest Cisco router that supports .1q is the 1721.
Chris
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55811&t=55795
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct an
Hi,
yes ,1720 does not support 802.1 q trunking.it is supported in 2600 onwards.
- Original Message -
From: "Firesox"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: Does 1720 support 802.1q trunking? [7:55795]
> I thought Any fastethernet port on Cisco routers s
Hi,
The hardware does not support 802.1q. You4ll need at least a 1721 to do
trunking.
Regards,
//Dan
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Fren: Firesox [mailto:sando2@;attbi.com]
Skickat: den 17 oktober 2002 13:48
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dmne: Does 1720 support 802.1q trunking? [7:55795]
I
I thought Any fastethernet port on Cisco routers support 802.1q Trunks, but
I cannot find an IOS that lets me 802.1q trunks on fastethernet port in 1720
router.
could someone verify that 1720 does NOT support suuport 802.1q?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
Dear all,
I have some problem about MC3810. Two of it connected using Leased Line
each side connect to local PBX using E1 R2. Unfortunately MC3810 is not
support E1 R2 signalling. So I turn it all into Trunk link. But DSP No.
8 is not up. When I use command "show voice dsp" all other DSP (No.
1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> John Brandis
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 11:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VOIP & Trunking [7:52587]
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am building a new LAN, and I wish to use 802.10 as
> the encaps type for my
> VTP do
Dear
As far as my knowledge you can you dotp and dotq only for voice
If i,ll find some good link that will help you i,ll post it here
bye
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52599&t=52587
--
FAQ, list archives, and su
:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VOIP & Trunking [7:52587]
Hi All,
I am building a new LAN, and I wish to use 802.10 as the encaps type for my
VTP domain.
I am also, getting some NEC IP Telephones. Does any know, if I can use the
802.10 to trunk to the phone ? Or do you need to use
Hi All,
I am building a new LAN, and I wish to use 802.10 as the encaps type for my
VTP domain.
I am also, getting some NEC IP Telephones. Does any know, if I can use the
802.10 to trunk to the phone ? Or do you need to use .1q ?
Thanks all,
John
Sydney,
Well there's some information missing. I see you only have 8 gig
ports, but where do VLANs come into play there? We need more
information.
Mike W.
"John Brandis" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> G'day all.
>
> G
G'day all.
Got a question regarding VLAN trunking in a switched environment. Say for
example, I have a Catalyst 5509 in my network at the core, and then I have
lower end catalyst switch's with a gigabit port on each. In this example,
lets say I have 14 VLANS to connect, however I o
I agree. Change the MTU on the bridges. I have a customer with 5 remote
sites connected via 802.11b and trunking across all 5 and I have to increase
the MTU.
What I would love to see is an update to the Aironet code that supports the
actual trunking header so my bridge management interfaces
An ISL frame can be as big as 1518 + 30 = 1548 bytes. The original frame is
encapsulated in a 26-byte header and a 4-byte CRC.
An 802.1Q frame can be as big as 1522 bytes. 802.1Q inserts a 4-byte header
immediately the destination and source MAC addresses (and source-routing
information, if pr
Actually, 802.1q adds four bytes, ISL encapsulation makes the frame much
larger (by 30 bytes) I so the increase from 1518 to 1522 would make
sense for dot1q and an increase from 1518 to 1548 would be needed for ISL
(if it's even supported on the 802.11 stuff, but I can't speak on that).
>- Original Message -
>From: "Marko Milivojevic"
>To:
>Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:24 PM
>Subject: RE: Trunking over Aironet bridge? [7:42833]
>
>
>> > yes, you must change the default frame size on the ethernet
>> > side of both
&
Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> > yes, you must change the default frame size on the ethernet
> > side of both
> > bridges to 1522 (default 1518). As far as the radio is
> That would be required for ISL, but 802.1q should go with no
> changes?
Nope, that's for 802.1Q. ISL has a 27-byte heade
> yes, you must change the default frame size on the ethernet
> side of both
> bridges to 1522 (default 1518). As far as the radio is
> concern it will pass
> the frames out over the wireless. You will need a switch on
> the other end of
> the bridge to recieve the frames and break out the vlan
.
- Original Message -
From: "Steven A. Ridder"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Trunking over Aironet bridge? [7:42833]
> yes
> ""Michael Bray"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > An
yes
""Michael Bray"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know if you can pass 802.1q over Aironet bridges?
>
> -mdb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42836&t=42833
---
Anyone know if you can pass 802.1q over Aironet bridges?
-mdb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42833&t=42833
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.htm
Hello,
The following link (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml)
states that the min. ios ver and feature set for isl/802.q trunking on a
Cisco 2620 is 12.1(5)T and 12.1(5)IP PLUS?
Is there any way that it can be done with 12.0.7T or 12.0.5T1IP/IPX feature
set?
Can someone please
r
> ASN 21572
> MortgageIT MITLending
> New York, NY 10038
> (212) 651 - 7695 Voice
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's pers
38
(212) 651 - 7695 Voice
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
I don't know what else you want me to do to prove it. This was true at one
time but
connect to a link or port connected to the switch then you can telnet to the
switch to configure it.
Answer #2 If your question is really something like "I have a Cat5K with a
Sup III blade that does not have any interface module - how do I configure
trunking to this switch?" It depends on
3660B(config-subif)#encap dot1 1
> C3660B(config-subif)#
>
> Dave
>
> danny wrote:
>
> > The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure subinterfaces
on
> > the ethernet. a trunking protocol must be configured on each sub with
the
> > correspondin
> described. The information you received from Cisco pertains to ISL
> trunks,
> which require a 100mb interface.
This was a good discussion. When I took my switching course, three
years ago, they were quite adamant that trunking could not be done on a
10 mb interface. Of course,
mation you received from Cisco pertains to ISL trunks,
> which require a 100mb interface.
>
> Sean
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Danny Andaluz, CCNP
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL
, CCNP
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
no you can't. I got straight from cisco that they have to be 100 meg
full-dux interfaces.
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"&g
n Ethernet, not FastEthernet, and that it does indeed allow
802.1q trunking.
ISL, on the other hand, does require FastEthernet. So maybe that is where
the confusion lies.
Regards,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Danny Andaluz, CCNP
Se
gt; ports:
> > >
> > > C3660B(config)#inter e2/0.1
> > > C3660B(config-subif)#encap dot1 1
> > > C3660B(config-subif)#
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > danny wrote:
> > >
> > > > The router's ethernet must be 10
unk 10 meg ports:
> >
> > C3660B(config)#inter e2/0.1
> > C3660B(config-subif)#encap dot1 1
> > C3660B(config-subif)#
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > danny wrote:
> >
> > > The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure
subinte
config-subif)#
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > danny wrote:
> >
> > > The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure
subinterfaces
> on
> > > the ethernet. a trunking protocol must be configured on each sub with
> the
> > > corre
config)#inter e2/0.1
> C3660B(config-subif)#encap dot1 1
> C3660B(config-subif)#
>
> Dave
>
> danny wrote:
>
> > The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure subinterfaces
on
> > the ethernet. a trunking protocol must be configured on
Actually on some platforms with the right IOS you can trunk 10 meg ports:
C3660B(config)#inter e2/0.1
C3660B(config-subif)#encap dot1 1
C3660B(config-subif)#
Dave
danny wrote:
> The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure subinterfaces on
> the ethernet. a trunki
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
George Siaw
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
Thanks for all your responses.
One last question though
The router's ethernet must be 100 full dux. You configure subinterfaces on
the ethernet. a trunking protocol must be configured on each sub with the
corresponding vlan #. The router will route between Vlans.
Hope this helps.
Danny
""George Siaw"" wrote in messag
.
Sent: 23 March 2002 00:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
The only time the SC0 interface comes into play is for telnet into the
box.
If you have any 100 MB ports on your switch, you can run trunking.
set trunk (mod/port) on isl
If this tru
The only time the SC0 interface comes into play is for telnet into the box.
If you have any 100 MB ports on your switch, you can run trunking.
set trunk (mod/port) on isl
If this trunk is running into a router, you need to create the subinterfaces
on the router to enable routing between VLANS
02 00:17
To: George Siaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
You dont have to configure SC0 interface to do isl or dot1q. Its only
needed
for management, telnet etc...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Fr
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ISL Trunking from a h/w's perspective [7:39246]
Guys,
Any ideas as how I can configure isl trunking without an Sc0 port on the
supervisor engines? Can I configure on of the ports to assume this
position i.e. Sc0? If so what are the cmds?
Regards,
G
> Any ideas as how I can configure isl trunking without an Sc0 port on the
> supervisor engines?
Your question is not clear. The SC0 port isn't relevant if you are
using trunking to connect two switches. All you have to do is "SET
TRUNK mod/port ON" on both switches and
Guys,
Any ideas as how I can configure isl trunking without an Sc0 port on the
supervisor engines? Can I configure on of the ports to assume this
position i.e. Sc0? If so what are the cmds?
Regards,
George.
Configs as below:
Console> (enable) sh mod 1
Mod Module-N
VLAN
IDs with a comma and no spaces; use a hyphen to designate a range of IDs. Do
not enter leading zeros.
Let us know if this works.
> -Original Message-
> From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
I have 15 different subnets on a eth 0/0 on a 2621 router with 15 secondary
addresses . I want to know if it is possible to change them to subinterfaces
and trunk more than one subnet accross a 2924 switch and pust more than one
subnet in the same vlan/port. That means putting more than one subnet
On Jun 16, 9:41pm, "Mike Sweeney" wrote:
}
} LOL- you have those nice people too? We threatened one guy with a very
} public stoning after he did something like that.
Just tell him that he won "The Lottery"; see
http://www.mostweb.cc/Classics/Jackson/TheLottery/
}-- End of excerpt from
I still don't see the need for VTP???
Have given the password thing some thought before but not sure if needed in
a smaller star topology type network. There are no other switchblocks.
A good stoning sounds awsome to me.
As far as bunnies and spanning tree I've made my core switch root bridg
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
