between two LAN segments.
Just make sure access-list is mirror image on both peers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX with PAT and VPN [7:23490]
I tried this and it did
Using a different IP subnet is the way to do it. The PIX treats this like a
virtual interface and has the intelligence built in to forward traffic
between the inside and the VPN address range.
Looking at your config, I agree with removing the conduit statement but I
don't believe
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX with PAT and VPN [7:23490]
I tried this and it did not work. When IPSEC negociates a VPN
session
between the two PIX's
I tried this and it did not work. When IPSEC negociates a VPN session
between the two PIX's, it will PAT an internal device from Network A as
206.112.71.5 and use 206.112.71.5:500 for the negociation. Once another
device wishes to access a device behind 206.112.71.6, it will have to use
In your config below the vpn client is being assigned an address that is on
a different subnet than the inside interface of the pix and there is no sign
of a router on that subnet (no default inside route to a router).
BTW, you may want to get rid of the conduit permit any any!
Chris
Anh Lam
Can someone in this group help me with this problem?
I am trying to setup VPN connections for remote users (people
who use laptops on the road or when people to who are on their
own corporate network) to connect to my home network using
IPSec. I am using a PIX515-UR Firewall at my home network
Anyone have this tweaked out yet as far as filters go? I want to only allow
necessary traffic on the Public interface and drop everything else. Any help
would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23617t=23617
Hello everyone.
I am trying to implement 2 Internet connectivity solutions while at the same
time creating 2 VPN solutions between two sites. What I would like to do it
use a PIX 515 at both sites, tunnel IPSEC between the sites and still have
normal access to the Internet.
What my problem
(inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0.Then input global
(outside) 1 206.112.71.5
Now on PIX2 input nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0.Then input global
(outside) 1 206.112.71.6
Now just complete your isakmp and crypto-map settings and you will be doing
one single VPN between peers and PAT
First thing, you have an old image. Upgrade first and see if it happens
again.
AG
-Original Message-
From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN Concentrator 3005 crashed [7:23470]
hi anyone ,
knows what does
://www.hellocomputers.com
Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556
International: 1.510.795.6815
Eurpoe: +(44)20 7900 3011
Fax: 1.510.291.2250
-Original Message-
From: tom cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: VPN/DNS
Group
, 2001 1:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN Concentrator 3005 crashed [7:23470]
hi anyone ,
knows what does this crash dump means
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
CRASHDUMP
I have some problems with my Ipsec configuration.
My configuration is like:
Internet---HQ---Internet--Office1
|
|InternetOffice2
Between HQ and Office i want to use VPN connection with Ipsec.
How should I make connection between Office1 and Office2
InternetOffice2
Between HQ and Office i want to use VPN connection with Ipsec.
How should I make connection between Office1 and Office2? Is it possible
to
do this through HQ or I have to do this through another Ipsec session
Office1-Office2.
I want that Office1 and Office2 should go to
)
Start Time: 10/18/2001 10:52:42
VERSION:
Bootcode:
Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN 3000 Concentrator Series Version 2.5.Rel Jun 21
2000 18:57:52
Software:
Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN 3000 Concentrator Series Version 3.0.2.Rel built
by vmurphy on Apr 05 2001 21:41:33
Loader:
Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN 3000
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Daniel Ma
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN Solution for Site to site Wireless connection [7:22101]
We deployed some wireless bridges with 11Mbps throughput. We are seeking
solutions which are not too
Dear All
Can anyone suggest where i can find information on VPN.
Any suggested link for reading ?
10Q
Regards
Kok Wah
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22022t=22022
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
:VPN [7:22022]
Dear All
Can anyone suggest where i can find information on VPN.
Any suggested link for reading ?
10Q
Regards
Kok Wah
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=22024t=22022
--
FAQ, list archives
A good starting point would be:
http://www.vpnc.org/
HTH,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
birdy
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 2:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN [7:22022]
Dear All
Can anyone suggest where i can find
We deployed some wireless bridges with 11Mbps throughput. We are seeking
solutions which are not too expensive to encrypt 11Mbps. However, we
calculated the cost, if we use cisco 2600 with VPN card, for one pair, the
price easily goes over $15,000.
Could any one provide solution around or under
I have a vpn solution from the internet but some apps don't work because of
latency over the internet. One of the solution I'm thinking of is using a
AS5300 for dialup for users to dialin. Is this a good solution and if so
where should I place this As5300 and how should it be configured
Daniel Ma wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We deployed some wireless bridges with 11Mbps throughput. We are seeking
solutions which are not too expensive to encrypt 11Mbps. However, we
calculated the cost, if we use cisco 2600 with VPN card, for
Is there any new small VPN module for Cisco1700 Series ?
Daniel Ma We deployed some wireless bridges with 11Mbps throughput. We
are seeking
solutions which are not too expensive to encrypt 11Mbps. However, we
calculated the cost, if we use cisco 2600 with VPN card, for one pair, the
price
Low Cost VPN Accelating Module
RANMA Is there any new small VPN module for Cisco1700 Series ?
Daniel Ma We deployed some wireless bridges with 11Mbps throughput.
We
are seeking
solutions which are not too expensive to encrypt 11Mbps. However, we
calculated the cost, if we use cisco
Part Number:
MOD1700-VPN: Cisco 1700 series VPN module
Straight from Cisco Web site and its been out for a while.
This same VPN module apparently works in 1700's, 2600's, 3600's, etc. too.
Part Number just changes for each main line platform.
Mark Odette II
StellarConnection Services
Hey Guys,
My setup as follows
Network Overview:-
---
InternetRouter(2621) Proxy Server-/
--- PDC /BDC etc
/
--- file servers
Router
--
Router is cisco 2621
hello Patrick,
can u tell me what i need to open for the outbond access to a vpn server
(win2k)
pix 506 is on lan and nat and pat is running
thnx in advance
fa
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21823t=21823
It is much easier to set up using shared secret keys than using digital
certificates.
It is not must that you have to use digital certificate.
From: cisco skin
Reply-To: cisco skin
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. Windows2k Clients [7:21011]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:05:17
Hi all,
Has one of you already experienced performance issue on a VPN, details
below:
We have a VPN over a 128k leased line terminated by 2 Cisco 2600.
Connectivity is ok, but we have a lot of delay over the vpn.
When I do a traceroute across the provider to a device on the other side
ip address live/30
2) If you are using NAT on the Router, then you may not VPN to the PIX,
making the Router the only possible VPN End-point. Obtain VPN license for
your router platform, or plan to redesign slightly.
3) If you ARE using 192.168.x.x/28 on your Serial, even your router
Hi all:
I need to configure VPN in cisco 1720.The configuration should use cisco
secure client 1.1 for cable or dialup remote user from the internet.could
guys let me know what is the best way to do that and also what type of
security is appropriate.
Next thing,Can I use proxy server behind
Hey Guys,
My setup as follows
Internet -- Router PIX -- Internal network
We are using a 192.168.x.x network and using NAT to change to valid ip
address.So when I need to setup VPN should I use the 192.168.x.x or the
Valid Ip address?
My internet router config
interface
The addresses assigned to the VPN client will typically come from a pool of
addresses from the inside network. It's also typical to terminate VPN
clients on your firewall, so in this case you would terminate them on the
PIX. There are examples on Cisco's web site for configuring client to PIX
Just curious how you guys have set this up...
I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN
Concentrator. I've got the Authentication bit down but seem to be having
trouble with the tunnel side of the house.
What's the best way to set this up... I would rather not mess
: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. Windows2k Clients [7:21011]
Just curious how you guys have set this up...
I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN
Concentrator. I've got the Authentication bit down but seem
PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN 3005 Conc. Windows2k Clients [7:21011]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:05:17 -0400
Just curious how you guys have set this up...
I have Win95 and Win2k clients that need to come into a Cisco 3005 VPN
Concentrator. I've got the Authentication bit down but seem to be having
trouble
What is a better design?
PIX and VPN Concentrator in Parallel
or in Series
Also
The the authentication
forward to radius to ACE
or to CISCO ACS
would like to hear what the Gurus have to say
Faisal
__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you
the bucks,
go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and
reliablity aspect.
Lori
-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Hi,
I'm looking
VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400
I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the
concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The
IOS solution is less expensive, but there are many bugs even with the
latest
versions
One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last
time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly
should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero.
I have to agree with the other folks, the concentrator (we have 3
vpn-3030 systems
:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last
time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly
should be had) big issues with some ISPs, especially aol and netzero.
I have
I am curoius to see what happens when CISCO comes out with the next Unified
client later on
P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice
Systems Integrator III
From: Andras Bellak
Reply-To: Andras Bellak
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001
The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT,
and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had
out. The new Unified client fully supports end user termination into the VPN
Concentrators (3000 currently, 5000 series soon) and the PIX 6.0
Could you tell me where should i put my concentrator in my network?
best regards,
frank
Bob Johnson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access
from a home workstation..
As far as I
]]On Behalf Of
Tim O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT,
and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had
out. The new
Has anyone had difficulty running the VPN client on
ME. We have had Cisco on phone and in ME the VPN
doesnt see the domain for some reason.
--- Jeff Chambers wrote:
They also released a Linux version of the client
about a month ago. I
haven't seen any problems with it yet. Very similar
Don,
I have installed and configured quite a few WG FB's where I last worked.
Where I work now, we setup a Cisco VPN 3000 concentrator for customers to
connect to us over the Internet. One customer has a Watchguard and was
unable to connect. We obtained a temporary FB II for testing and could
I think he meant router to pix vpn (as opposed to client to pix) in which
case the router does much more than provide connectivity...
Patrick Ramsey wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
As far as I remember the netscreens do support ipsec vpn's... (we have
As long as the router on the other end supports IPSec and IKE you should be
able to. I've connected PIX boxes to Cisco routers a few times now and seem
to recall seeing documentation on connecting to other types of routers on
cisco.com when I was looking for configs to do the PIX-2600 VPN.
http
I am looking for a Mac Mac OSX VPN client that will work with either a
525PIX or a 3000 series concentrator. I know there is one that will work
with the 5000 series concentrator but nothing that specifically says will
work with the above mentioned products on Cisco's website. Anyone
I am attempting to set up our PIX 506 to allow 3DES IPSEC VPNs to be
created over the internet from a client dialed to local ISP.
I have tried many clients but am having a horrible time with Cisco's
3000 version 3 client. (some workstations will be Win2k therefore
ruling out the secure client).
a year.
From: Andras Bellak
Reply-To: Andras Bellak
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:15:56 -0400
One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last
time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again
We're experiencing an issue with connectivity to one of our customers that
require the use of a Redcreek Ravlin VPN device. They have been up and
running fine up until we enabled the NBAR fix to prevent the Code Red Worm
virus as referenced in
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63
I have no problem with PIX to 3000 client 3 client.
You have to create tunnel on PIX, not on client. Are
you using sample config from TAC center? If so, you
have to add one more access-list to create the tunnel,
they forget to put it there...
HTH.
Jim
--- Kevin McIntyre
wrote:
I am
not work I have access to a ravlin VPN and can do
some testing for you.
Shannon Murphy 09/20/01 03:27PM
We're experiencing an issue with connectivity to one of our customers that
require the use of a Redcreek Ravlin VPN device. They have been up and
running fine up until we enabled the NBAR fix
Subject: experiment with VPN [7:20482]
I have following VPN setup.
R1 (E0=10.1.1.1/24 S0=63.211.144.52/24)
LAN1=10.1.1.0/24
R2 (E0=10.1.2.1/24 S0=63.211.154.52/24)
LAN2=10.1.2.0/24
R3 (E0=10.1.3.1/24 S0=63.211.164.52/24)
LAN3=10.1.3.0/24
is not a problem (although if you
wanted to, you could create two on R1, just in case the requirement ever
changed)
- Original Message -
From: pat
To: EA Louie
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: experiment with VPN [7:20482]
Louie,
I wonder how you can do
]]On Behalf Of
Shannon Murphy
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NBAR ACL and Redcreek Ravlin VPN devices [7:20615]
We're experiencing an issue with connectivity to one of our customers that
require the use of a Redcreek Ravlin VPN device. They have been up
I did not understand how u can use dynamic IP address
on router to create VPN tunnel with PIX
pat
--- MikeN wrote:
Based on your explanation, I can't tell what model
of router and WAN
connectivity you are using. Is the router connecting
to the PIX or do you
have a client behind the router
Afternoon, all.
I work for a reseller and support a good number of PIX firewalls with an
outside telnet connection using the VPN 3.0 client. My company uses a
Watchguard Firebox 2 as its own firewall (don't ask, I've tried). Right now,
I'm dialing an ISP to get an outside address and launching
Hi,
I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access
from a home workstation..
As far as I know my options are:
1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1
2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1
3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1
It would
I have following VPN setup.
R1 (E0=10.1.1.1/24 S0=63.211.144.52/24)
LAN1=10.1.1.0/24
R2 (E0=10.1.2.1/24 S0=63.211.154.52/24)
LAN2=10.1.2.0/24
R3 (E0=10.1.3.1/24 S0=63.211.164.52/24)
LAN3=10.1.3.0/24
R1
Hi,
a cisco 3002 connects to cisco vpn 3030 concentrator, after tunnel sets
up, how to relay broadcast at 3002, that is to say how to see hosts on 3030
from network neighbor under win98?
Ths
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20492t=20492
- Original Message -
From: pat
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:35 PM
Subject: experiment with VPN [7:20482]
I have following VPN setup.
R1 (E0=10.1.1.1/24 S0=63.211.144.52/24)
LAN1=10.1.1.0/24
R2 (E0=10.1.2.1/24 S0=63.211.154.52/24)
LAN2=10.1.2.0/24
R3 (E0
Hi,
Have someone already experienced a problem with VPN passing through a cisco
803?
I want to initiate a VPN from a MS VPN Client to a IOS FW terminating the
VPN through a Cisco 803.
PC(with VPN client)-Cisco803-Internet-Cisco2600(IOS
FW)-Corporate Net
My session goes
I'm looking to study the Cisco method of VPN implementation. I've worked a
little with the IOS firewall feature pack, but have a few questions about how
all of these features on a Cisco edge router work together. First of all,
does anyone know which feature set is required to nail up a tunnel
.
-Original Message-
From: Robert McIntire
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 18:58:18 -0400
Subject: VPN - NAT interoperability [7:20326]
I'm looking to study the Cisco method of VPN implementation. I've worked a
little with the IOS firewall feature pack, but have a few
HI
I have a cisco router at a remote site that is connected to the internet
with a dynamic IP from ISP. I am using a vpn tunnel with ipsec 3DES to
connect to a Pix firewall at my central site. My question is, am I exposed
to any security problems on my cisco router
Based on your explanation, I can't tell what model of router and WAN
connectivity you are using. Is the router connecting to the PIX or do you
have a client behind the router connecting to the PIX. Yes, your router is
vulnerable unless you are running ACL's and CBAC. The VPN tunnel isn't
Pix and router... yes... with the right IOS feature set. Not sure about the
pix and netscreen... probably but you'll have to look it up.
Leo Shen wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
can a pix and a router(such as 1720) make a vpn?
and can a pix(or
As far as I remember the netscreens do support ipsec vpn's... (we have 3
here on our network but are not using them for vpn's) I'll take a look
though.
And yes you can use a pix for a vpn as long as you have the activation key
that supports 56bit or 168bit encryption. The router really plays
]
Subject: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:31:20 -0400
I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its
driver to a network card.
We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the
Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I
can a pix and a router(such as 1720) make a vpn?
and can a pix(or a router) and netscreen(a sort of hardware firewall)make a
vpn?
for instance,in usa,there is a pix,in taiwan province of china,there is a
netscreen,can they make a vpn connection?
thanks
Message Posted at:
http
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco VPN Client [7:19858]
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:31:20 -0400
I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its
driver to a network card.
We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the
Cisco VPN Client
You point to
c:\program files\common files\deterministic network\DNE\dne.sys
in stead of c:\i386 when you install the VPN client. This is a known problem
with IBM T20/21 machines.
Regards
Jon Gudmundsson
-Original Message-
From: George Kallingal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13
I have a question about the Cisco VPN Client software and how it binds its
driver to a network card.
We have an NT server that we are connecting to a remote network using the
Cisco VPN Client (to a Concentrator 3000, I believe). Upon connection
through the VPN, I lose connectivity to the other
sounds like a split tunnel issue. I believe split tunneling is turned off by
default.
if this is the case, here is the explanation:
the model for VPN is a user station connecting to a corporate network
through the internet. There is an issue with having an open internet net
connection
As opposed to the Nortel Extranet client (which allows local and VPN network
access), the Cisco (nee Altiga) client completely binds the interface when
the tunnel is up. I experimented with this particular problem in December
for the same capability (access to local and remote-over-VPN servers
Looks like it's a split-tunnel problem. Once you lunch
VPN, all traffic will be encrypted, other local
machines couldn't decrypt the data. You can enable
split-tunnel on 3000, tell it only traffic to your
main office needs to be encrypted.
HTH.
Jim
--- George Kallingal wrote:
I have
Hi all,
I try to configured the 2 Cisco 515 PIX for site to site VPN and run in some
problem ... it does not passing the traffic for the VPN. I have searched the
Cisco site for sample configuration but that does not work or help much or I
might looking at the wrong place.
If anyone know where I
]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I try to configured the 2 Cisco 515 PIX for site to site VPN and run in
some
problem ... it does not passing the traffic for the VPN. I have searched
the
Cisco site for sample configuration but that does not work or help much or
I
might looking at t
I want a VPN dialer and a sample configuration to dial to an ISP then
establish VPN between VPN client and the main branch with IOS IP IP PLUS 56
and router 1720
Mohammed Saro
Network Engineer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18309t=18309
This is what a simple search on cco turned up.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cmatrix.shtml
Mohammed Saro wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I want a VPN dialer and a sample configuration to dial to an ISP then
establish VPN between VPN client and
I want a VPN dialer and a sample configuration to dial to an ISP then
establish VPN between VPN client and the main branch with IOS IP IP PLUS 56
and router 1720
Mohammed Saro
Network Engineer
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18217t=18217
What version of VPN Concentrator S/W and VPN client software are u using.
Are u connecting from behind a NAT device, or is your VPN situated behind
the firewall.
I am facing a similar problem when connecting using certificates.
With similar errors : on client : Remote peer not responding.
On VPN
is done). So
maybe check that your not using AH.
C
-Original Message-
From: r r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 August 2001 03:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vpn through pix [7:17782]
yes, pat running on the pix. i did make static
translations for the vpn users so they dont have
Tom, you have to remember that when using an Internet VPN, there are a lot
of pieces of equipment between you and your corporate VPN server. Each of
those ISP routers and switches add some latency, and on top of the
additional latency there is likely to be more jitter. (variable latency due
Can some one guide me for the learning purpose some good links and recourses
--
Mahesh Chandra
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17840t=17840
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Are you running PAT on the pix?
- Original Message -
From: r r
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:19 PM
Subject: vpn through pix [7:17782]
does anybody have ideas on what is needed to use a vpn
client through a pix running nat? another way to put
it: i have users inside
I have a T1 coming into my VPN 3000 Concentrator. When I dialup to the
Internet and get a connection rate of 50.6 Kbps and then VPN into the
corporate LAN via this connection the throughput is slower than if I dialed
directly into the corporate LAN via a direct dialup and getting a connection
Does anyone know if there is a mac VPN client that will work with the Cisco
PIX 525 6.x? Do folks use a VPN client if they are connecting through the
PIX and connecting to a Unix/Linux box in the internal network or just
SSH? Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
yes, pat running on the pix. i did make static
translations for the vpn users so they dont have a pat
address.
Are you running PAT on the pix?
- Original Message -
From: r r
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:19 PM
Subject: vpn through pix [7:17782]
does anybody have ideas
I have a VPN 3000 concentrator installed. When Microsoft Outlook is
launched with the VPN client connection, Outlook is extremely slow. Has
anyone encounter this or have any insight on this. Thanks.
Tom
_
Get your FREE
I am looking for someone who is running VPN's between 2621 routers and PIX
525 on IOS 6.0 to campare notes with.
How are they working for You?
Thanks
Thank you,
Rob Mears III, CCNA, MSCE, CNE, NNCDS, NNCSS, A+
Technical Mercenary
Valor Telecom
Message Posted at:
Are you using Outlook w/ Exchange or POP/IMAPing?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17708t=17692
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Judging from the fact that Tom's doing VPN, I'd say 'with Exchange.'
I realize that you already have VPN 3000 Concentrator; but, try Netscreen
VPN, it's lightening fast.
Randall
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10
Is your VPN client using NAT? If so, disable Allow
IPSec through NAT (yes, disable). I had same problem
with VPN client 3.0 beta, not sure if it's fixed in
3.1...
--- Tom Richs wrote:
I have a VPN 3000 concentrator installed. When
Microsoft Outlook is
launched with the VPN client
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Randall Yoo
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN and Outlook [7:17692]
Judging from the fact that Tom's doing VPN, I'd say 'with Exchange.'
I realize that you already
I have the same problem, but its due to the fact that users are pulling so
much data from exchange over a 56k link latency is expected. My users that
have dsl and cable modems have no complaints.
Kevin
From: Randall Yoo
Reply-To: Randall Yoo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN
We had the same problem. Fixed with ver 3.0.3.
Elil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin O'Gilvie
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN and Outlook [7:17692]
I have the same problem, but its
1001 - 1100 of 1685 matches
Mail list logo
