Hey mate - you just leave our kangaroos out of this or you may have your own
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Jean Stockton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2000 12:58
To: Kane; Dale Holmes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
he! he! he!
you
n of those who produce
it.
-- Ayn Rand
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Montgomery, Robert WARCOM Contractor
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
CCO said 64...an
CCO said 64...an unverified CCIE here said 65
-Original Message-
From: Elaine Poulsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
I dunno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How many useless replies do
thanks Elaine, I'm sick at home and that made me chuckle..
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "Elaine Poulsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 October, 2000 11:09
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> I dunno
Holmes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
> But will this satisfy the evident "bloodlust" out there ? The pillowcase
> with the doorknobs is a reasonable start , but I can't help thinking that
> will only have the masses howling for more... Perh
I dunno.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How many useless replies do we need on this topic ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:21 PM
> To: Mark Cohen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possible
How many useless replies do we need on this topic ?
-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:21 PM
To: Mark Cohen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
Maybe cisco checked this out and found out that he /she
-
From: "Dale Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>
> Gee,
>
> Maybe a few of us should get together and meet him
In a message dated 10/25/00 8:55:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This seems to have opened a large debate. I have to say my feelings about it
> are mixed. One the one hand, a person should not be allowed to misrepresent
> this certification. Cisco should be able to ve
your head.
>From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: ick daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:16:51 -0500 (CDT)
>
>On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, ick dani
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam LI
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:03 PM
To: Brad Beck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
Hey,
there are too many different kind of people around, some of them are really
keen on being the real one, so
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Mark Cohen
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:36 PM
> To: Raul F. Fernandez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
> Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pin
aul F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:35:36 -0400
>
>Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pinging an large number of
>hosts simultaneously. I asked him (the bo
Nnanna -
You mean you didn't study that chapter while preparing for your Cisco certs?
-Original Message-
From: Nnanna Obuba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:54 PM
To: Mark Cohen; Raul F. Fernandez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Possible phony
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
face
> it guys, there is nobody out there that knows everyth
further
than you have.
Just me thoughts.
Curtis
>From: "Raul F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Raul F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Tim O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cisco
><[EMAIL P
He is phony because he BSed about SMB traffic being caused by pings. We've
all run into these balloon types. They are annoying. I'm glad he got caught.
Priscilla
At 12:54 PM 10/23/00, Nnanna Obuba wrote:
>Because he does not know about a bug in checkpoint he
>is a phony C
I wouldn't drop it. You don't want to accuse someone unnecessarily, but if
someone at the CCIE program stated that the card was bogus, I assume that
they did a name lookup and found he wasn't certified. You may want to
pursue this on two fronts: 1) contact the people employing this guy and
t
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Cohen
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possible phony CCIE
Greetings-
I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE. He
even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I
I wouldn't drop it. You don't want to accuse someone unnecessarily, but if
someone at the CCIE program stated that the card was bogus, I assume that
they did a name lookup and found he wasn't certified. You may want to
pursue this on two fronts: 1) contact the people employing this guy and
t
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, ick daniels wrote:
> How do you know he is not certified. By sending a mail
> to Cisco. Pleaseee. I just tried it by sending a card
> of someone who is a CCIE and i got a reply that he
> does not exist. If you doubt his credentials be a man
Ick, do you mind sharing the name
How do you know he is not certified. By sending a mail
to Cisco. Pleaseee. I just tried it by sending a card
of someone who is a CCIE and i got a reply that he
does not exist. If you doubt his credentials be a man
and challenge him. Just because you asked a question
about firewall and he doesn't k
Should I conclude that after all the studies and sacrifices and expenses,
when I become a ccie, I am not allowed to forget
any of the things that I have learnt, and must remember CCO line by line?
And if I dare to forget, then immediately I turn into a bonehead?
Bernard
Doesn't the 'E' in
Please give us a break. There are 4 CCIE certifications, why?
I would assume a R/S CCIE does not know anyting about 8600 is acceptable,
right?
So you ask him a bug about Checkpoint, why not Windows 98, Linux or tons of
those bugs in IE or Outlook?
Even if it is something relates to R/S, but the g
000 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
> It seems rather silly to me that a CCIE would suggest that a Sun box would
> "flood the wire with excessive SMB traffic". I'm not saying this rules
> this man out of being CCIE, just that the diagnoses is a poor one coming
> fro
Borghese
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:22 PM
To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
I thought CCIE stood for Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert. I believe
Engineer has legal ramifications. I am sure you can ask for his number then
check with Cisco. Ther
At 12:54 PM 10/23/00 -0700, Nnanna Obuba wrote:
>
>
>Because he does not know about a bug in checkpoint he
>is a phony CCIE? In case you jave forgotten, CCIE
>means
>certified CISCO Internetwork Expert... give the guy a
>break
>
>Nnanna
>
>--- Mark Cohen <[EMAI
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
> Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
face
> it guys, there is nobody out there that
'material' in my inbox.
-Original Message-
From: hao vu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2000 6:19
To: 'Winchester, Derek S.'; 'Raul F. Fernandez'; 'Tim O'Brien';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Cisco'
Subject: RE: Possible ph
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
> Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pinging an large number of
> hosts simultaneously. I asked him (the bogus ccie) why he thought that
would
> bring down the firewall? H
Maybe cisco checked this out and found out that he /she is a ccie.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:55 AM
Subject: Possible phony CCIE
> Greetings-
>
>
> I recently worked on a p
Doesn't the 'E' in CCIE actually stand for Expert? Not only is this guy a
phony, but kind of a bonehead as well. Definitely let Cisco (mail address
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]) know.
See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ for the logo.
Good luck,
Chuck Church
CCNP, CCDP, MCNE, MCSE
Sr. Networ
, October 23, 2000 9:46 AM
To: 'Raul F. Fernandez'; Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
You actually never know what a Guy knows. I have an ex-coworker that is a
CCIE. He got recruited by Xedia Corp 3 years ago.He had to learn there
routers and techn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Raul F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Possible phony CCIE
>Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:35:36 -0400
>
>Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpoint firewall by pinging an large number o
Because he does not know about a bug in checkpoint he
is a phony CCIE? In case you jave forgotten, CCIE
means
certified CISCO Internetwork Expert... give the guy a
break
Nnanna
--- Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul-
>
> I brought down the local checkpo
opinions.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Possible phony CCIE
Greetings-
I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a
CCIE. He
even gave me his card with the
nt: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
Dear folks,
I have to agree with Tim on this one. It may have been possible that the
person at this site just did not pay enough attention to the question posed
or that he may not know
er
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456
-Original Message-
From: Raul F. Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
Subject: Re: Possible phony C
ROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
face
>it guys, there is nobody out there that know
, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the the
past
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
Subject: Possible phon
Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the the
past
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
Subject: Possible phony CCIE
> Greetings-
>
>
> I recently wo
I think you should contact your local Cisco representative and press
this matter forward urgently. Such con artists do enormous damage to
the credibility of genuine CCIEs, not to mention the damage they could
do to a client's network.
Don't hestitate - shout loudly!
--- Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PRO
Greetings-
I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE. He
even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it is the
CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the words
Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as
43 matches
Mail list logo
