I received a letter from Cisco to say that I was certified as an Information
Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional. The certification is now also
included on the Cisco cert tracking system (www.certmanager.net/cisco).
Essentially all it is:
Some Ciscos CCSP exams as being of a standard
Any suggestions on which path to follow? Is it recommended to follow the
routing and switching path first?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74664t=74664
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the
Dear Friend
I would say Security would be better , since security plays a major
role in network these days , more over there are very less not of security
certified people around the globe, but one info security is not as easy as R
S , any thing , wish you all the best
Bani
Message
Typically, you'd do the RS ccie first. You'd need to know most of the RS
stuff anyhow to do the security exam.
The only way I'd suggest going for the security exam first is if you're
already a master of the security topics (PIX, IDS, VPN, etc). If you feel
confident that you can totally master
Hi there,
If I wanted to be a CCIE, I would go for Security track or maybe the voice
track, but I think the latter is too specialized. Security is something you
need to know anyway, if you want to be a good and respected network
professional. Companies will understand that you know the most
Sybex has books for the new CCSP coming out in November/December too late
for the CCS1 conversion but if your starting from scratch...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74096t=73971
--
**Please support GroupStudy
Sybex has books for the new CCSP coming out in November/December too late
for the CCS1 conversion but if your starting from scratch...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74097t=73971
--
**Please support GroupStudy
]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wireless security and VPN software? [7:73988]
One more quick note on using VPN solutions. If your using a
VPN solution
with a Cisco AP be sure to enable PSPF. Everyone misses that
setting...
but it's important
One more quick note on using VPN solutions. If your using a VPN solution
with a Cisco AP be sure to enable PSPF. Everyone misses that setting...
but it's important. :)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74049t=73988
]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: wireless security and VPN software? [7:73988]
One more quick note on using VPN solutions. If your using a VPN solution
with a Cisco AP be sure to enable PSPF. Everyone misses that setting...
but it's important
, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wireless security and VPN software? [7:73988
someone else has a answer for this - but one problem we do have is
when a user roams from one WAP-area to another their VPN gets dropped.
4. If using all one brand you can go for other security options (e.g.-LEAP)
5. If it is a static, reasonably small user population you could also go for
mac
, disclose, distribute,
copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from
your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wireless security and VPN
Well, I thought for sure I was going to fail, but I passed the CSI test with
a score of 902. Needed 825 out of 1000...
After giving it some thought, I think it's probably better if I don't
comment on the wireless questions at this point. I had typed up quite a bit
of observations that I just
What is the passing score for the SAFE test?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73976t=73971
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and
: Cisco Safe Security Exam --9E0-131 CSI or 642-541 CSI
[7:73795]
Hi,
I will appreciate comments from anyone who have recently written the Cisco
SAFE exam. Since the 9E0-131 will be retired on 9/30/03, am thinking of
taking
the 642-541 exam. All I have is the 7 safe white papers.
However
Hi All
i have oct22nd lab date in san jose and looking for early Sep in san
jose...if anyone would like to swap please e-mail me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73782t=73782
--
chan Lu wrote:
What is the passing score for the SAFE test?
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
825
Message Posted at:
Hi,
I will appreciate comments from anyone who have recently written the Cisco
SAFE exam. Since the 9E0-131 will be retired on 9/30/03, am thinking of
taking
the 642-541 exam. All I have is the 7 safe white papers.
However, I think its only one of the white papers that deals with the exam
on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: annlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Safe Security Exam --9E0-131 CSI or [7:73971]
chan Lu wrote:
What is the passing score
For a large campus network that has a need for wireless access in conference
rooms, cafeterias, etc., would it be overkill to require wireless clients to
use VPN IPSec software to access the campus network? This is for a customer
who is paranoid about security and understands the tradeoff of ease
: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
[7:73471]
Dear all
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco routers/switches
having IOS as their operating system,their Interfaces
to put the wireless users in their own network
and implement security where the wireless and wired networks join. If
they are concerned with the traffic going back and forth over the
wireless network, what about encrypting all of their traffic by default?
If they use a VPN solution, it does nothing
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
For a large campus network that has a need for wireless access in
conference
rooms, cafeterias, etc., would it be overkill to require wireless clients
to
use VPN IPSec software to access the campus network? This is for a customer
who is paranoid about security
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
[7:73471]
Dear all
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco routers/switches
having IOS as their operating system,their Interfaces
will be blocked by IPv4 Packets.In
What type of applications do they need to support?
What devices and OS's do they need to support?
-Watch out for PDAs. Most PDAs have limited support for VPN clients.
What type of users are they? (Techie or basic AOL users?)
These are the main questions in my opinion. VPNs aren't so bad.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Safe Security Exam --9E0-131 CSI or 642-541 CSI
[7:73795]
Hi,
I will appreciate comments from anyone who have recently written the Cisco
SAFE exam. Since the 9E0-131 will be retired on 9/30/03, am thinking of
taking
the 642-541 exam. All I have is the 7 safe white
All,
Sorry about the OT, but if you or someone you know has both their CCIE and
a current or expired US govt. security clearance (secret or higher), my
company has an immediate need. There are also many other jobs, not
requiring a CCIE, but all need the secret or higher clearance
I received a e-mail from Cisco on July 1, 2003 about a new cert. :
On July 1, 2003, candidates in the Cisco Career Certifications Tracking
System who meet the above requirements will be recognized as an Information
Systems Security (INFOSEC) Professional and will receive
No. What are the above requirements?
Thanks
Alan
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73580t=73514
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives,
Alan Ho wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. What are the above requirements?
Thanks
Alan
Content of e-mail from Cisco:-
+
Cisco Security Training Leads to Information Systems Security (INFOSEC)
Professional Certificate
In April 2003, the National Security
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco routers/switches
having IOS as their operating system,their Interfaces
will be blocked by IPv4 Packets.In this regard,i have
a querry.
Is it that all the router having IOS will be blocked
or certain specific IOS
]
Onderwerp: CCIE Security lab exam [7:73398]
Everyone,
Has anyone taken the CCIE security lab exam recently? Please email me
offline what your think about it. How much preparation did you put into
prior
to the exam? Thanks.
D.
-
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo
Dear all
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco routers/switches
having IOS as their operating system,their Interfaces
will be blocked by IPv4 Packets.In this regard,i have
a querry.
Is it that all the router having IOS will be blocked
or certain
Hi,
As stated on Cisco page, specific IP packet could block the interface.
You can use access-lists to block those packets or upgrade the IOS.
All vulnerable IOS are in the list:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml
Regards
Message Posted at:
Dear all
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco routers/switches
having IOS as their operating system,their Interfaces
will be blocked by IPv4 Packets.In this regard,i have
a querry.
Is it that all the router having IOS will be blocked
or certain
straight
forward.
From: Mr piyush shah
Reply-To: Mr piyush shah
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Interface Blocked by IPv4
[7:73470]
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:50:57 GMT
Dear all
Recently there was an article on Cisco Security
Advisory which stated that all Cisco
Everyone,
Has anyone taken the CCIE security lab exam recently? Please email me
offline what your think about it. How much preparation did you put into
prior
to the exam? Thanks.
D.
-
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Message
I have some training for the old CSS1 exams. Anyone know if these will be
any good for the *new* CSSP exams? TIA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72508t=72508
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Yes. Just add the safe test. CSFPA, VPN3000 are all similar
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72536t=72508
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Hi
I am looking for this exam too. Could you be more specific ? Which version
for which
course ?
Could you please recommend me some good tests for this exam ? What tests are
you going
to use ?
Thank you
Chris
NetEng wrote:
I have some training for the old CSS1 exams. Anyone know if these will
What is SAFE???
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network Security [7:70841]
At 3:18 PM + 6/20/03, annlee wrote:
SAFE does start out with the explicit assumption
SAFE is Cisco's new (well not that new), Security Architectural Model that
fits quite nicely into the more grandiose AVVID architecture. HTH,
Will Gragido CISSP CCNP CIPTSS CCDA MCP
Suite 325 9450 W. Bryn Mawr Ave.
Rosemont, Il 60018
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Knowledge Behind The Network
It is a Cisco security blueprint. Check out
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/netsol/ns110/ns170/ns171/ns128/networking
_solutions_package.html
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
Safe =
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns110/ns170/ns171/ns128/networking_solutio
ns_package.html
What is SAFE???
FWIW, there is an example Security Polcy in the MCNS course book from Cisco
Press --
Mike Wenstrom's book --
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1578701031/qid
Hello,
I need to give the CCIE exam in September'03 in San jose. But the date
is not available.
I got a date in Brussels, Belgium for Sep 09 . But since I am out of
work , I am not able to afford to go to Brussels.
Hence anybody is willing to exchange the exam date /location with me
will be
Hi all
I am planning to appear for CCSP EXAMS .May I request
people from Mumbai ,India to have off-line discussion
to have joint efforts.This will help us in sharing
idea ,study material etc.Interested people can email
me offline on [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Thanks in davance .
Piyush
Hi all
I am planning to appear for CCSP EXAMS .May I request
people from Mumbai ,India to have off-line discussion
to have joint efforts.This will help us in sharing
idea ,study material etc.Interested people can email
me offline on [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Thanks in davance .
Piyush
Hi all,
I just received an email from Cisco regarding this cert that I have
apparently qualified for. Does anyone have any information around this? From
what I can see from the exam tracking system, my CSS1 exams qualified me for
this.
Regards
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
Bytes
Andrew
I qualified for this as well. Cisco sent me an email about it the other day
and today I received the qualifying confirmation. You can find further
information at the following URLs.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/learning_certification_program_updates.html
At 3:18 PM + 6/20/03, annlee wrote:
SAFE does start out with the explicit assumption that a Security Policy is
already in place.
A valid observation. Still, with this specific post, there doesn't
seem to be either a threat assessment or a security policy, just a
request for mechanisms
plant i hv 140 switches.
want to go for network security. e.g. protect from
virus attact , hacking so can anyone sugest me cisco
product. please give me the URL also so i can study.
Thanks Regards,
milind Tare
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95
As you've reminded me many times, Annlee, one really needs a security
policy and a threat assessment before going into the details of the
security architecture solution. SAFE doesn't give much guidance on
policy formulation.
I'm concerned with the goal statement of the original poster, Want
As you've reminded me many times, Annlee, one really needs a security
policy and a threat assessment before going into the details of the
security architecture solution. SAFE doesn't give much guidance on
policy formulation.
I'm concerned with the goal statement of the original poster, Want
Dear All,
i hv following setup;-
2 6506 core switches having redundancy. 10 Nos. 3508
Distribution Switches. and 3500 series access's
switches. in whole plant i hv 140 switches.
want to go for network security. e.g. protect from
virus attact , hacking so can anyone sugest me cisco
product
}:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was supposed to take the security lab exam in San Jose this week;
however, I have to forfeit it 'cause of job related project. My company,
is willing to pay for the security lab in Brussels in July. Anyone has
taken the exam recently? How difficult was it? I have been
I was supposed to take the security lab exam in San Jose this week;
however, I have to forfeit it 'cause of job related project. My company,
is willing to pay for the security lab in Brussels in July. Anyone has
taken the exam recently? How difficult was it? I have been preparing
for the lab
Hi Eric,
I have a question for you. Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Ad L
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70540t=70493
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I really appreciate your response. I have been trying to make sense of the
whole problem and suggested solution. Suppose I have only 2 NICs. one
going to each of two switches. They are supposed to be pooling but for some
reason I see two MACs that differ only by the last character. But those
for Port Security? I know I can set up the ports to handle several MAC's
but if they are running the same virtual MAC what's the answer?
David
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70030t=70030
--
FAQ, list archives
was to provide said fault
tolerance). These NICs had their FastEthernet cables going to each
switch respectively. (4 NICs in each Server, 2 CAT5500's to plug into).
The virtual mac's of the Teaming group was plugged into the port
security table on the CATs. The CATs were also Trunk'd together via
GBICs
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66616t=66616
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case some of you weren't able to see that URL, here it is again with a
couple of lines of padding:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66622t=66616
--
FAQ, list
:
That,s not enough, download and read the cisco security
executive summary at
the link below for good tips on hardening your router.
http://www.nsa.gov/snac/cisco/download.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Doug S
Sent: Saturday, March
I work with a lot of different vendors firewalls and IMO PAT is a security
feature (to a degree). like many other security features its not perfect by
itself, but when combined with other features its creates a full firewall.
technically PAT alone would be an aspect of stateful inspection
That,s not enough, download and read the cisco security executive summary at
the link below for good tips on hardening your router.
http://www.nsa.gov/snac/cisco/download.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Doug S
Sent: Saturday, March 22
On my home network, I rely almost exclusively on NAT overload for security.
Even though I know it's not a security measure, I've yet to hear anyone with
a good explanation of why it's not enough, at least for a home network. I
know there's a bunch of really bright people here, so if anyone would
Hi,
I am CCIE in RS. Thinking of appearing for another track. I know
several of you have CCIE in multiple tracks
Can you suggest me which one of Security Vs Communications and Services
is better w.r.t
1. Equipment needed for preparation.
2. Ease of preparation (I am fairly new
Hi,
I am CCIE in RS. Thinking of appearing for another track. I know
several of you have CCIE in multiple tracks
Can you suggest me which one of Security Vs Communications and
Services is better w.r.t
1. Equipment needed for preparation.
2. Ease of preparation (I am fairly new
Fundas wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am CCIE in RS. Thinking of appearing for another track. I know
several of you have CCIE in multiple tracks
Can you suggest me which one of Security Vs Communications and Services
is better w.r.t
1. Equipment needed for preparation
Hello all,
I saw a post a little bit ago about security news groups. I'll ask
again because I also have been looking for one. Any one know of a good
security news group? If so please share.
Steve
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64907t=64907
Aiello
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Security News Groups [7:64907]
Hello all,
I saw a post a little bit ago about security news groups. I'll ask
again because I also have been looking for one. Any one know of a good
security news group? If so please share
Hello..
Anyone out there in intense networking land know of any network security
newsgroups just as good as this? Thanks for the input.
Regards,
Jason
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64796t=64796
--
FAQ, list
will probably always suffer from
problems related to security and/or reliability, because of the cherished
anonymity of users (including those who would wreak havoc by creating
viruses or DoS attacks) and because of the lack of a true central authority
which is good because it allows for innovation
. The Internet will probably always suffer from
problems related to security and/or reliability, because of the
cherished
anonymity of users (including those who would wreak havoc by creating
viruses or DoS attacks) and because of the lack of a true central
authority
which is good because it allows
to hire a *nix capable individual or retrain
his
existing Microsoft capable people. Same for the management platform.
same
for any of the security related software products.
sergei wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Makes sense, - M$ products need it more...
DAve Diaz wrote
. The Internet will probably always suffer from
problems related to security and/or reliability, because of the cherished
anonymity of users (including those who would wreak havoc by creating
viruses or DoS attacks) and because of the lack of a true central authority
which is good because it allows
Dear members
Once you have completed the written , how long do you get to prepare for the
LAB ?
Suranjith
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63425t=63425
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
You get one year from passing your written till sitting the exam.
Suranjith Ariyapperuma wrote:
Dear members
Once you have completed the written , how long do you get to
prepare for the
LAB ?
Suranjith
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63426t=63425
18 months
Suranjith Ariyapperuma wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dear members
Once you have completed the written , how long do you get to prepare for
the
LAB ?
Suranjith
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63433t=63425
18 months to sit the exam, up to 3 years total to pass
Peter Walker
--On 20 February 2003 16:30 + Troy Leliard
wrote:
You get one year from passing your written till sitting the exam.
Suranjith Ariyapperuma wrote:
Dear members
Once you have completed the written , how long
Microsoft needs to develop a stronger MSDE community with independent
software vendors and keep track of the use of MSDE as a redistributable
component. (TruSecure publishes Security Wire Digest.)
NTBugtraq and the SQL Security Forum have produced a list of more than 100
potentially affected
to turn WEP on, but I think I can just leave out the key and
specify the length. Is this right? The documentation isn't very clear.
-Original Message-
From: 910T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Too much Security Overkill
and rotate them dynamically at the specified interval.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brown
To: 910T ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:48 AM
Subject: RE: Too much Security Overkill on wireless network??? [7:62010]
I'm testing this very
they will be exposed when surfing
non-secure sites wirelessly...no worse than at a public hot-spot...
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
- Original Message -
From: eric nguyen
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:51 AM
Subject: Too much Security Overkill on wireless
Hi,
I have assigned the task of setting up a wireless network for my company
and I am wondering that I use too much security for the wireless.
Currently, I am setting a test wireless network for about 5 users.
Eventually, this
network will have about 50 users. My set up is as follows:
1
Preface this by saying I am NOT a security expert. This is more for my own
information/learning.
Just curious, but what is stopping you from using LEAP? Again, not being a
security expert, I'm not familiar with PEAP.
I would think that if your WLAN is in the DMZ, and has to create a VPN
network so thats why I'd setup the VLAN behind
the higher security level interface. Your design is not going to scale well
for certain. Your time is better spent paying more attention to other
security needs on the wired network which is always a concern as well.
eric nguyen wrote in message
that sounded like a
good, innovative way to provide an additional level of protection.
But I realize that security is always a tradeoff with both performance and
ease of use. It's wise to remember that there can be such a thing as too
much security, as the original poster says.
Right now he
:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Too much Security Overkill on wireless network??? [7:61685]
Hi,
I have assigned the task of setting up a wireless network for my company
and I am wondering that I use too much security for the wireless.
Currently, I am setting a test wireless network for about
in it that will
help.
Darrin Gibson
-Original Message-
From: eric nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Too much Security Overkill on wireless network??? [7:61685]
Hi,
I have assigned the task of setting up a wireless network
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, eric nguyen wrote:
Hi,
I have assigned the task of setting up a wireless network for my company
and I am wondering that I use too much security for the wireless.
Here are some thoughts. Maybe the CCIE isn't so much of a moron. Because
I will state that you do have way
Does anyone have ideas as to what security certification to try to purse
I completed the CCNP track Checkpoint or Cisco new security track? Also any
recommend study guides and pratice exams that could be used?
Thanks...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61088t
. On the other
hand experience with a firewall product such as Checkpoint or PIX certainly
isnt going to hurt your resume. You may want to also consider looking at
the CISSP cert (very high level, management oriented) if you have
verifiable security work experience, or if you are looking for something
my plan is to get my CCNP, then start with some security certs particularly
the SSCP and then the CISSP. my understanding is that the GIAC and CISSP
require knowledge have come alot closer in recent months.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61091t=61088
Hi,
Just a question, looking at the list of equipments for this LAB I see
PIX with version 5.2, this brings to me a question should we use the
conduit or the last access-list commands ?
Thanks and Regards,
BF
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60553t=60553
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Bruno Fernandes
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 7:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Security CCIE LAB [7:60553]
Hi,
Just a question, looking at the list of equipments for this LAB I see
PIX
Hi all,
Call me lazy (but not OLD!) but has anyone extracted a typed list of the
Chapter References in the Cisco PRess MCNS book? If so, could you forward
the list to me. I'm compiling a list of security references -- for use in
my security studies -- and am hoping to use this as a jumping off
Greetings-
I have recetly decided to embark on my CCIE for security. I already have
one book called All in one CCIE study guide by Roosevelt Giles. This is
the second edition. I am wondering if this is a good book for this
ceritfication, and what other books do I need please?
Also how
Hi all!!
I would be grateful, if anyone in the group would guide me to buy the
required books also tell me what equipment do i need to prepare for the
following certifications.
CSPFA 9E0-571 - Secure PIX Firewall Advanced Exam
WLANFE 9E0-581 - Wireless LAN for Field Engineers
Thanks
Syed Adil
1 - 100 of 842 matches
Mail list logo
