Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My attempt to help the next person in line avoid the same confusion > > (by updating step 12) is available as 37779 [1]. > > > > -Rahul > > > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779 > > Applied. You know, you can do t

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

> > My attempt to help the next person in line avoid the same confusion > (by updating step 12) is available as 37779 [1]. > > -Rahul > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779 Applied. You know, you can do this yourself ;-) Any commons committer can update commons-build and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37779] - [site] Update release documentation (Step 12 - Updating Jakarta site)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r353831 - /jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/release.xml

Author: psteitz Date: Sat Dec 3 23:43:57 2005 New Revision: 353831 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353831&view=rev Log: Fixed paths to news pages in instructions for updating main Jakarta site. BZ #37779 Contributed by Rahul Akolkar Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk

Re: [configuration][ALL] compatibility issues with hsqldb

I had a similar problem with Dumbster in commons-email. I downloaded and rebuilt it in jdk 1.3, and asked the developers if they were ok with that version being uploaded to ibiblio. Luckily there wasn't already a jar there for the latest release. I opened a ticket in the Maven jira to get it uplo

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > okay, made it down to step 12 now. > > > > > > However, there is no such file since 2nd quarter of 2005, and the > > index.xml mentions that this has now been retired, and the apache site

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37779] - [site] Update release documentation (Step 12 - Updating Jakarta site)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37779] New: - [site] Update release documentation (Step 12 - Updating Jakarta site)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

:) Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? I had to laugh seeing this topic crop up. The problems were with site generation, as mentioned in another thread - something that wouldn't exist

svn commit: r353822 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk: fileupload_checks.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/MultipartStream.java

Author: martinc Date: Sat Dec 3 22:33:55 2005 New Revision: 353822 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353822&view=rev Log: Fix more Checkstyle warnings. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/fileupload_checks.xml jakarta/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/java/org/apach

[all] Website changes (was Re: short critique of site)

I've posted a version of the Commons website in my ~ which contains a "Dormant" section to match the Commons repository (some of the links are absolute, so if you're clicking through, do make sure you're not going out to jakarta.apache.org, if that matters): http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons

svn commit: r353815 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk: project.xml.sample xdocs/building.xml xdocs/releases/release.xml

Author: psteitz Date: Sat Dec 3 21:00:47 2005 New Revision: 353815 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353815&view=rev Log: Several fixes to building and release docs: * Included instructions for updating xdoc plugin. * Replaced obsolete elements with throughout examples. * Changed -dev to -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37772] - [site] Maven-related updates to the commons site

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r353814 - /jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/pluginUpdate.txt

Author: psteitz Date: Sat Dec 3 20:41:29 2005 New Revision: 353814 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=353814&view=rev Log: Added file with commands to update maven plugins. Added: jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/pluginUpdate.txt (with props) Added: jakarta/commons/proper/co

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? > > Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I > have to ask, have we over the last two years or so actually got the > benefits that maven promi

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

On 12/3/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Just add something like this in the maven.xml (the test is pretty useless > probably..): > > > > > And of course you should add xmlns:ant="jelly:ant" to have the ant namespace > available.. > > Don't kno

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

On 12/3/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? > > > > Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I > > have to ask, have we over the

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by HenriYandell

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by HenriYandell: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence The comment on the change is: Removed Cactus from SVN. T

svn commit: r352059 - /jakarta/commons/proper/cactus/

Author: bayard Date: Sat Dec 3 18:12:41 2005 New Revision: 352059 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352059&view=rev Log: Cactus left long ago. The Cactus svn directory contains these tags and branches Removed: jakarta/commons/proper/cactus/

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

Stephen Colebourne wrote: >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I have to ask, have we over the last two years or so actually got the benefits that maven promised? And do we believe that maven2 wi

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

On 12/3/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? > > > > Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I > > have to ask, have we over the la

Re: JavaPolis, who's coming ?

Wish I could go :( Hope it all goes well. Hen On 12/3/05, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sweet.. I'll see you at lunch ;) > > Mvgr, > Martin > > Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 decem

Re: [all] short critique of site

On 12/3/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Some thoughts on the site. > > > > > > > B] Clicking on sandbox. > > > > 1) There are many projects which have become dormant. How should we be > > changing the site? > > 2) Correspondin

Re: [all] short critique of site

A further remark about the site. I think that we should kill the big list of siblings on the left hand side of each component's site. It's no longer scoping, hard to keep up to date and not that useful. People can '..' up to Commons via the links. Admittedly my other ideas on the site might make

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Dennis Lundberg wrote: Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nope, 1.6. This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these releases. How is o

Re: [all] Maven, help or hinderance?

On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? > > Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I > have to ask, have we over the last two years or so actually got the > benefits that maven promi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37772] - [site] Maven-related updates to the commons site

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration][ALL] compatibility issues with hsqldb

I had the same problem in Commons Resources recently. We had been using hsqldb 1.7.1 (which I think was OK with JDK 1.3) - but the problem was it shut down the database if all connections were closed. I fixed an issue in Commons Resources to close connections properly and found the tests failed - u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37772] New: - [site] Maven-related updates to the commons site

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[all] Maven, help or hinderance?

>>Hate to be an "old fart" here but was ant really all that bad? Well it is a question isn't it? I suppose this is a flame thread, but I have to ask, have we over the last two years or so actually got the benefits that maven promised? And do we believe that maven2 will help? When I think of m

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

Hi Stephen, Just add something like this in the maven.xml (the test is pretty useless probably..): And of course you should add xmlns:ant="jelly:ant" to have the ant namespace available.. Don't know from the top of my head which target to hijack when using the dist target (t

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

Phil Steitz wrote: Thanks, Martin. I stand corrected then and will shut up about this. To close this out, I guess we are agreeing that we have no standard for line endings and will make no attempt to make them consistent. I did not know the Windows cvs client was also converting the files, so

Re: [all] short critique of site

On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some thoughts on the site. > > > B] Clicking on sandbox. > > 1) There are many projects which have become dormant. How should we be > changing the site? > 2) Corresponding Wiki page needs changing [my fault :) ] > I tinkered with one of thos

Re: JavaPolis, who's coming ?

Sweet.. I'll see you at lunch ;) Mvgr, Martin Stephen Colebourne wrote: Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 december (the whole week). Anyone else coming, so we can meet for eg drinks ? On monday night there is already a meeting with some myfaces fo

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, 1.6. > > This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these > releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40 > plugins you have to have in order to build a release? and what if one doesn't want to be o

Re: [Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by RahulAkolkar

On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know what is actually meant by 'not default' here ? > I was wondering about that myself, I read the "The Problem" part of the wiki page but [collections] seems to fit "The Plan". Maybe those "non default" comments on the wiki pag

Re: JavaPolis, who's coming ?

Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 december (the whole week). Anyone else coming, so we can meet for eg drinks ? On monday night there is already a meeting with some myfaces folks.. I will be there all week. I've proposed a commons 15 min talk on Mon

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by RahulAkolkar

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence The comment on the change is: Arrange "sandbox" into san

Re: [Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by RahulAkolkar

Anyone know what is actually meant by 'not default' here ? Stephen Apache Wiki wrote: - * Collections - /!\ Has Maven site, but not default. + * Collections - /!\ Has Maven site, but '''not default'''. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by RahulAkolkar

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence The comment on the change is: Missed Feedparser, though

Re: [all] short critique of site

robert burrell donkin wrote: On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 23:47 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: 7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance? I don't know how this page is maintained currently, but maybe it could be built automatically from the POMs with a s

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by JamesCarman

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JamesCarman: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence -

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingStandardWebPresence" by RahulAkolkar

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/CreatingStandardWebPresence The comment on the change is: Update proper components l

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > Another thing that might work would be to add explicit dependencies to > > the required versions in commons-build's project.xml. Then executing > > even the clean target there would make maven download and install th

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Nope, 1.6. > > > > > > > > This is sort of what I meant when I sa

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Wow, who would have thought the smallest of releases would produce this much email traffic??? Dennis Lundberg wrote: Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Yes, thanks, fixed it now. Rahul Akolkar wrote: On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pls disregard. I figured it out. Yup, noticed that as I clicked send to the earlier email. I think you've a typo, the id for the net 1.4.1 news item should be 20051203.1 (instead of 2005203.

svn commit: r352050 - /jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml

Author: mvdb Date: Sat Dec 3 15:35:37 2005 New Revision: 352050 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352050&view=rev Log: whoops.. recover commented out extend Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml URL

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

Has everyone been following the bit on http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html? -- "Committers will need to properly configure their svn client. One particular issue is OS-specific line-endings for text files. When you add a new text file, especially when

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nope, 1.6. This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these releases. How is one supposed to KNOW w

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nope, 1.6. This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what

svn commit: r352049 - /jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml

Author: mvdb Date: Sat Dec 3 15:26:20 2005 New Revision: 352049 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352049&view=rev Log: Added iso-8859-1 encoding, since the u umplaut is not utf-8 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/transaction

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pls disregard. I figured it out. Yup, noticed that as I clicked send to the earlier email. I think you've a typo, the id for the net 1.4.1 news item should be 20051203.1 (instead of 2005203.1) -Rahul > Steve Cohen wrote: > > okay, made it

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nope, 1.6. > > > > > > This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these > > > releases. How is one supposed to

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > okay, made it down to step 12 now. > > * Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing > the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose > name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory.

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Pls disregard. I figured it out. Steve Cohen wrote: okay, made it down to step 12 now. * Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory. For

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nope, 1.6. > > > > This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these > > releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40 > > plugins you have to have i

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

okay, made it down to step 12 now. * Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory. For example, the news for a release created in July 2004

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, 1.6. > > This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these > releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40 > plugins you have to have in order to build a release? > > Does Jakarta or Jakarta-commons h

Re: [all] Commons Manual

On 12/3/05, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume > > that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the > > Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the > > chapters

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Nope, 1.6. This is sort of what I meant when I said it's harder to do these releases. How is one supposed to KNOW what versions of these 30 or 40 plugins you have to have in order to build a release? Does Jakarta or Jakarta-commons have a page that tells you the minimum maven setup needed t

Re: [all] Commons Manual

Henri Yandell wrote: Let's imagine a manual existed for Commons committers. It would assume that a committer understands the ASF, ie) they've read the Apache-Committer-Manual (imagine that exists too). What would the chapters be? Initial list: * Short description of Commons/Introduction. * Comm

svn commit: r348046 - /jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml

Author: dion Date: Mon Nov 21 16:25:08 2005 New Revision: 348046 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=348046&view=rev Log: Removed tabs Fixed POM as per bug 37314 Use groupId/artifactId instead of id Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/l

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

Thanks, Martin. I stand corrected then and will shut up about this. To close this out, I guess we are agreeing that we have no standard for line endings and will make no attempt to make them consistent. I did not know the Windows cvs client was also converting the files, so thought this was a "n

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

You need to make sure you are running version 1.9.2 of the maven xdoc plugin. maven plugin:install maven maven-xdoc-plugin 1.9.2 Phil On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks guys. statcvs gone. Past that hurdle. > > Now this one: > > > > xdoc:jelly-transform: > [echo]

Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart

On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/2/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > In the "old days" we kept lf line endings on all the source files in > > > cvs and hand-rolled ant scripts were used to put crlf on the .txt > > > files in the zips. Between m

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Thanks guys. statcvs gone. Past that hurdle. Now this one: xdoc:jelly-transform: [echo] Generating /home/scohen/commons-net/branches/NET_1_4_1/target/docs/javadoc.html from /home/scohen/commons-net/branches/NET_1_4_1/target/generated-xdocs/javadoc.xml Could not find the class: org.ap

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

On 12/3/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't think it is feasible to patch the maven dist plugin or the > hand-rolled ant scripts to inspect .svn/props for each file and then > change line endings accordingly. > > I also verified that distros created on Windows are in fact shippin

Re: [all] Together, and bricks apart

On 12/2/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In the "old days" we kept lf line endings on all the source files in > > cvs and hand-rolled ant scripts were used to put crlf on the .txt > > files in the zips. Between maven and svn's eol=native, that is no > > longer possible or at l

svn commit: r352026 - /jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.xml

Author: scohen Date: Sat Dec 3 13:40:38 2005 New Revision: 352026 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=352026&view=rev Log: remove statcvs plugin which doesn't work. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/project.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Yes, remove the reference to the statcvs report from the element. You should obviously also check in the change so the project builds correctly from svn sources. You should have no problem building from branches, tags, etc., as long as commons-build is checked out as a peer. Phil On 12/3/05, S

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rory Winston wrote: > > statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)... > > > > http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13 > > > > I just turned off the statcvs report last time. > > > > > > > where do you do that? Project.xml? Yup, for thi

Re: [all][POLL] what files to fixcrlf for windows distributions

I don't think it is feasible to patch the maven dist plugin or the hand-rolled ant scripts to inspect .svn/props for each file and then change line endings accordingly. I also verified that distros created on Windows are in fact shipping CRLF line endings on all files that have eol=native in their

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Rory Winston wrote: statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)... http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13 I just turned off the statcvs report last time. where do you do that? Project.xml? - To unsubscribe, e-mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37727] - [resources] Fix serializability contracts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37727] - [resources] Fix serializability contracts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [configuration][ALL] compatibility issues with hsqldb

I saw the same problem when I was testing the [configuration] release with a .mavenrc set to force maven itself to run under 1.3. (which, btw is another workaround for the jdk spec in manifest problem), but I did not mention it since the build with maven.compile.executable pointing to jdk 1.3 worke

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)... http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13 I just turned off the statcvs report last time. Steve Cohen wrote: Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it! 5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You'll ned maven 1.0.2 plus the latest release of any plugin that barfs. > Plus you'll need various project properties set. See commons-io for a > recent working example. > > And yes you are right, releasing with svn and maven at ASF is a

Re: [Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsManual" by HenriYandell

Will this eventually be translated to xdoc and included in the commons site? Is it really too painful to just start by developing it in xdoc, or by modifying the commons web site? Much of the content is already there. Generating the commons site is just "maven site" from commons-build and "maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

On 12/3/05, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen, > > thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow: > > - What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything > about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the > *.java

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

Oliver Heger wrote: - What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the *.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right? The purpose is so users can attach the source of the component to the binary jar f

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

You'll ned maven 1.0.2 plus the latest release of any plugin that barfs. Plus you'll need various project properties set. See commons-io for a recent working example. And yes you are right, releasing with svn and maven at ASF is a right royal pain. Stephen Steve Cohen wrote: Sheesh, the r

Re: HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it! > 5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was supposed to > be a simple release. > > Phooey. > > I decided that that easiest way to do this "simple" release f

Re: [configuration][ALL] compatibility issues with hsqldb

Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Oliver Heger wrote: > >> As I found out the cause for that is the hsqldb.jar distributed through >> ibiblio, which was built for JDK 1.4 and later. Indeed I was able to >> recompile hsqldb on JDK 1.3 and then the problem disappears. >> Unfortunately there does not seem to b

HELP! - WAS: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it! 5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was supposed to be a simple release. Phooey. I decided that that easiest way to do this "simple" release fixing ONLY the 1.3 compatibility problem would be to work f

Re: [net] Minimum jdk/jvm version for net ( future ) ( was: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1? )

Steve Cohen wrote: We need to discuss this further. Mario Ivankovits VFS is a client of Net and he has users still on 1.3 who are complaining that Net 1.4 breaks VFS. And not only my users constantly complain about it. AFAIK this is also true for other commons components. Though, there is an en

Re: [net] Minimum jdk/jvm version for net ( future ) ( was: Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1? )

We need to discuss this further. Mario Ivankovits VFS is a client of Net and he has users still on 1.3 who are complaining that Net 1.4 breaks VFS. Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote: I understand the issues involved with pending release of vfs and compatibility with net, but I thought we discussed duri

Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Steve Cohen wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: Mario Ivankovits wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: It has been discovered that 1.4.0 is inadvertently incompatible with jdk 1.3. Please vote on a release of a fixed version. Checked VFS using "net svn head" and it works. So here is my +1 BTW: maven buil

Re: [vote][net] Release commons-net 1.4.1?

Shouldn't that be "no substantive issues"? ;-) robert burrell donkin wrote: i'm now +1 i'd like to thanks rory for his quick response. i'm now satisfied that there are substantive issues with the net code and so i'm happy to change my -1 to a +1. - robert On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 22:08 +,

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 1.2

Stephen, thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow: - What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the *.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right? - Line endings:

Re: [all] short critique of site

On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 23:47 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > 7) Contributor page. Is this worth the effort of the maintenance? > > I don't know how this page is maintained currently, but maybe it could > be built automatically from the POMs with a script ? +1 such a sc

Re: JavaPolis, who's coming ?

Martin van den Bemt wrote: Hi everyone, I will be at javapolis from 12 till 16 december (the whole week). Anyone else coming, so we can meet for eg drinks ? On monday night there is already a meeting with some myfaces folks.. I'll be arriving Monday and I'll be around on Tuesday and Wednesday.

svn commit: r351968 - /jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/xdocs/changes.xml

Author: scohen Date: Sat Dec 3 08:03:42 2005 New Revision: 351968 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351968&view=rev Log: update changes log Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/xdocs/changes.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/xdocs/changes.xm

svn commit: r351961 - /jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/build.xml

Author: scohen Date: Sat Dec 3 07:43:40 2005 New Revision: 351961 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351961&view=rev Log: update for version 1.4.1 Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/build.xml Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/branches/NET_1_4_1/build.xml URL: ht

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24456] - [net] FTPClient.listFiles can not get file list of directorychinese characters

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24539] - [net] The telnet client is leaving the connection even after calling the disconnect properly.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

  1   2   >