Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.20-6

2002-02-21 Thread John Cavan
On 21 Feb 2002, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > > It might make more sense to create some add-on packages that provide the > > selection of which XFree86 server and kernel modules are used. > > so 2 kernel et 2 XFree server just for this drivers ? No, have a simple package with the radeon kernel mo

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.20-6

2002-02-19 Thread John Cavan
Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ati.2.php > > do you use the right kernel version with the patched drm ? Seems to me that this makes Mandrake less likeable as a kernel development platform. Generally speaking, up until now, major software components (such as XFree86) did

[Cooker] unixODBC menu error

2002-01-08 Thread John Cavan
There are multiple repeating entries in the unixODBC-gui-qt menu file, amongst other things (including cat << EOF ... ). John

[Cooker] XMorph conflict

2002-01-06 Thread John Cavan
[root@lion RPMS]# rpm -Uvh xmorph-20010220-5mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...### [100%] file /usr/lib/menu/menu from install of xmorph-20010220-5mdk conflicts with file from package menu-2.1.5-79mdk John

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-linus2.4-2.4.16-4mdk

2001-12-15 Thread John Cavan
Juan Quintela wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: kernel-linus2.4 Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 2.4.16Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 4mdk Build Date: Sat Dec 15 17:58:48 2001 Hmm... this is cool, but being to

[Cooker] Which is the culprit?

2001-12-10 Thread John Cavan
I can't seem to build a bootable kernel anymore. It gets to: Loading linux. And then reboots. Very strange. However, two major and influential pieces have undergone updates on Cooker recently: binutils and gcc. One of these would appear to be the guilty party. I've tried grub and lilo, bot

[Cooker] Mirrors not synced?

2001-11-25 Thread John Cavan
As far as I can tell, neither primary mirrors have synced up with recent changes in the past two days. Which reminds me, the link from the cooker page on the Mandrake web site to sunsite.uio.no is wrong... Regards, John

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.1.0-13mdk

2001-09-09 Thread John Cavan
John Cavan wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Frederic Lepied wrote: > > > - radeon updates from cvs (need feedback from r128 and radeon users) > > Hosed, badly. Sample error messages: Further to that, I backed out the patch and rebuilt. Everything is up and running fine now. John

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.1.0-13mdk

2001-09-09 Thread John Cavan
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Frederic Lepied wrote: > - radeon updates from cvs (need feedback from r128 and radeon users) Hosed, badly. Sample error messages: ... Symbol vgaHWRestore from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol vgaHWGetIndex from module /usr/X11R6/lib

[Cooker] CUPS pstoraster is non-functional

2001-08-25 Thread John Cavan
Hi all, I'm finding that when running a print job, pstoraster just spins away processing and never finishes. This is with cups-1.1.10. Anyone else encountering this? John

Re: [Cooker] starttime

2001-07-12 Thread John Cavan
Leon Brooks wrote: > > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > Henrik Berglund SdU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>I have noticed that it takes about 12sec or longer to start abiword > >>or other programs in gnome or kde but only about 1-2 sec in windowmaker > >>why is that? > > > You're probably

Re: [Cooker] New PHP doesn't have MySQL support built-in

2001-07-05 Thread John Cavan
Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Thu Jul 05, 2001 at 12:55:58AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > So sprach John Cavan am Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 06:42:57PM -0400: > > > Now that MySQL support is not a seperate package, the new version > > > doesn't have it b

[Cooker] New mesa...

2001-06-22 Thread John Cavan
In mesa-demos .libs/* does not exist... John

[Cooker] Found the potential problem point for backspace in vim

2001-05-31 Thread John Cavan
Well... I've narrowed it down somewhat... the originator of the problem is in /etc/bashrc. When the backspace key is set: if [ -x /usr/bin/tput ]; then if [ "x`tput kbs`" != "x" ]; stty erase `tput kbs` elif [ -x /usr/bin/wc ]; then if [ "`tput kbs|wc -c `" -gt 0 ]; stty erase `

[Cooker] From latest X install...

2001-05-21 Thread John Cavan
Some errors... XFree86 ## xftcache: error while loading shared libraries: xftcache: undefined symbol: XftDirSave execution of XFree86-4.0.99.900-2mdk script failed, exit status 127 XFree86-100dpi-fonts

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.0.99.900-2mdk

2001-05-21 Thread John Cavan
Arnd Bergmann wrote: > 1. gccmakedepend creates wrong dependencies for *.S files. This causes >the build of the xc/extras/Mesa/src/X86/*.S to fail. >I fixed this by patching gccmakedepend (%patch11), you did the >compile twice. My approach seems cleaner, but it could have some >sid

Re: [Cooker] Problems with XFree86-4.0.99

2001-05-20 Thread John Cavan
"J . A . Magallon" wrote: > First and more important, all the fonts in the dirs 100dpi, 75dpi and misc > look like screwed, thay are all gzipped files of size 20 bytes. Same thing here... fonts are messed up in general. The Type1 module won't load as well. > And just a detail, /usr/X11R6/lib/lib

[Cooker] XCDRoast spec file buglet

2001-04-24 Thread John Cavan
Hi all, The specfile for XCRoast has a "Requires: cdrecord = 1.9 cdrecord >= 1.9-mdk4". John

[Cooker] WindowMaker WINGs -- missing pixmaps

2001-04-15 Thread John Cavan
Hadn't noticed this before, but the pixmaps for the WINGs library widget sets are not being installed into /usr/share/WINGs thus making WINGs cranky and display empty boxes where there should be icons. Just happened to run WSoundPrefs which uses the file browser mechanisms and saw the problem. J

Re: [Cooker] M$ Exchange server

2001-04-04 Thread John Cavan
OS wrote: > > Hello, > > Our company has just moved over to an Exchange server and the sys admins are > being very unfriendly when it comes to giving access to things other than > Outbreak 2000 !! > > Does anyone know if there is a Linux Exchange client out there any where ? http://www.bynari.

Re: [Cooker] /etc/passwd in RPMs

2001-04-03 Thread John Cavan
Ed Wilts wrote: > > Basically, all I'm suggesting is that we treat /etc/passwd and similar > > files like XF86Config... create it, never install it. After that, specific > > packages can add or remove as needed, including setup. > > I disagree. I regularly go through and search for .rpmnew files

Re: [Cooker] /etc/passwd in RPMs

2001-04-03 Thread John Cavan
On 3 Apr 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Would it not make more sense for the install program to create the base > > files in /etc and then execute update-passwd? Keeps /etc from being > > littered with *.rpmne

Re: [Cooker] /etc/passwd in RPMs

2001-04-03 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it really necessary to have /etc/passwd and /etc/group in RPMs? I > > yes, needed for install in any case new/removed groups are merged by > update-passwd file. Would it not make more se

[Cooker] /etc/passwd in RPMs

2001-04-02 Thread John Cavan
Hey guys, Is it really necessary to have /etc/passwd and /etc/group in RPMs? I can't possibly think of a install of Mandrake that would retain the initial copies of these files past about an hour, so updates just leave a bunch of *.rpmnew files lying around. Would it not be better to create the u

[Cooker] Minor quibble...

2001-03-31 Thread John Cavan
Since the /usr/share/doc directory is mapped in the default Apache config, the index.html in the HOWTO section should be using relative links to the images, not hard paths through the filesystem. Relative is better anyways, more portable. As I said, minor quibble. :o) John

[Cooker] Updated spec for PHP

2001-03-31 Thread John Cavan
Hi all, Here's a diff of the php spec to make it work with the latest apache. It includes BuildRequires changes for new libs, etc. It works for me... :o) John php.spec.diff

Re: [Cooker] Don't you trust XFree86? :)

2001-03-13 Thread John Cavan
Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > > > > > With XFree86 4.x you don't need an external font server. Why are Mandrake > > still using xfs? Instead of FontPath "unix/:-1" in XF86Config you > > can add the > > font paths directly. Much simpler, more user-friendly and future proof. > > > > IMHO it should dep

[Cooker] kdenetwork depends on PPP?

2001-02-27 Thread John Cavan
Just wondering why... the majority of the network apps have nothing to do with PPP, it would be better to split the PPP dependent apps out into a dial-up package. I shouldn't need PPP to read mail... John

[Cooker] kdeutils depends on APM?

2001-02-27 Thread John Cavan
Following up on the kdenetwork depending on PPP is kdeutils on APM... Umm... same thing, if the APM functions are split out, that would be a good thing. Using the calculator is definitely not dependent on advanced power management support... :o) John

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] modutils-2.4.2-3mdk

2001-02-27 Thread John Cavan
Matthias Badaire wrote: > > --=-=-= > Name: modutils Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 2.4.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Version 2.4.3 is out with some fixes. John

Re: [Cooker] Driver for Matrox 450 dual head

2001-02-26 Thread John Cavan
Alex Hulse wrote: > > Yes, very much, as my online banking requires that I use Netscape 4 or IE 4 > onwards. Mozilla/Konqueror won't work and you don't think I'm mad enough to > install NS6 do you? :) > > Maybe make it a little less prominent, but still include it please. AFAIK, you can have ko

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.4.1-16mdk

2001-02-17 Thread John Cavan
> Question how do you make using ecgs instead of gcc Normally... "export CC=kgcc" and similar for kg++... For building the kernel, I usually just edit the Makefile. John

[Cooker] WindowMaker 0.64.0 is out

2001-02-10 Thread John Cavan
Some bug fixes... but nothing super major that I can tell, 0.63.1 has been working great for me. :o) John

Re: [Cooker] rpm won't install some rpm packages

2001-02-03 Thread John Cavan
Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote: > > I'm having problems installing a number of rpm packages. > > Can't install these: > Guppi-0.35.2-1.i586.rpm > glibc-2.2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm > glibc-devel-2.2.1-3mdk.i586.rpm > bonobo-0.33-2mdk.i586.rpm > > rpm error message: > "only packages with major numbers

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.0.2-4mdk.i586.rpm

2001-01-21 Thread John Cavan
Giuseppe Ghibo' wrote: > OK, I was wondering if someone successfull get 3D accel under > Matrox G400 with XF 4.0.2. I haven't been able to get my Matrox G400 working under 4.0.2 even with the DRI code from SourceForge. I've tried it with the Matrox HAL and without. Always dumps with Sig 11. Kind

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.0.2-4mdk.i586.rpm

2001-01-21 Thread John Cavan
> 600fps on which card? It's possible. I get over 800fps with a Radeon and the DRI code. John

[Cooker] And the good news is...

2001-01-15 Thread John Cavan
Linus has finally added ReiserFS to the main kernel tree, officially in 2.4.1-pre5, working in 2.4.1-pre7... :o) John

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.0.2-4mdk.i586.rpm

2001-01-13 Thread John Cavan
uli wrote: > > John Cavan wrote: > > uli wrote: > > > But there is still a problem with hardware acceleration of my ATI Rage > > > 128. Since kernel-2.4.0-1 /var/log/XFree86.0.log says "(II) R128(0): > > > Direct rendering enabled ". But XFree8

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.0.2-4mdk.i586.rpm

2001-01-13 Thread John Cavan
uli wrote: > But there is still a problem with hardware acceleration of my ATI Rage 128. > Since kernel-2.4.0-1 /var/log/XFree86.0.log says "(II) R128(0): Direct > rendering enabled ". But XFree86-libs-4.0.2-4mdk seems not to deliver the > right libGL.so.1.2. All programs that use this lib stop

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.0.2-3mdk

2001-01-09 Thread John Cavan
Antony Suter wrote: > > I cannot compile XFree86-4.0.2-3mdk.src.rpm > My system is Mandrake 7.2 with some cooker packages and kernel 2.4.0 > from www.kernel.org. > > > make[9]: Entering directory > >`/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/XFree86-4.0.2/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kerne

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.0.2-3mdk

2001-01-08 Thread John Cavan
"Giuseppe Ghibò" wrote: > * Sat Jan 06 2001 Giuseppe Ghibò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4.0.2-3mdk > > - make freetype2 conditional in SPEC file (for Mandrake 7.2 backport). > - make HAL conditional in SPEC file (e.g. mgaHALlib.a). > - added glxinfo, xgamma, pcitweak, showfont, revpath and their > man

[Cooker] Problems with latest cooker RPMS

2001-01-08 Thread John Cavan
Hey all, some probs: bcast-2000b-1mdk.i586.rpm: - got: "error: bcast-2000b-1mdk.i586.rpm cannot be installed" gcc-2.96-0.31mdk.i586.rpm: - alternatives are not updated AfterStep-1.8.8-1mdk.i586.rpm and libAfterStep1-*: - got: "error: failed dependencies: netscape is needed by AfterStep-1.

Re: [Cooker] Problem with XFree86-4.0.2-2mdk

2001-01-07 Thread John Cavan
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > I don't need droppriv to make it work. > > here's mine: > > daemon xfs -port -1 -daemon -user xfs -droppriv causes xfs to run as user xfs -user allows you to specify the user to run as They are basically the same. If you su to xfs before running xfs, yo

[Cooker] xfs initscript and kdm

2001-01-05 Thread John Cavan
The latest initscript for xfs fails to start the font server (4.0.2-2mdk). I haven't debugged the script yet, but the font server is fine if started from the command line. Also, would it be possible to NOT have the kdm config file blown away on upgrades? Once you tweak it for your system, such as

Re: [Cooker] error compiling gimp-1.2.0-1mdk.src.rpm

2001-01-04 Thread John Cavan
Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > I got the same problem as Anthony with the same configuration (Mandrake > 7.2, perl 5.6-17mdk, and gimp 1.1.25-13mdk) : > > creating script-fu > make[4]: Quitte le répertoire > `/home/guillaume/RPM/BUILD/gimp-1.2.0/plug-ins/script-fu' > make[3]: Quitte le répertoire >

[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] kfontinst-0.9.1-1mdk

2001-01-02 Thread John Cavan
Lenny Cartier wrote: > > [Contrib-RPM] > > --=-=-= > Name: kfontinstRelocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 0.9.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft > Release : 1mdk Build Date: Tue Jan 2 17:35:45 2001 > Install date

Re: [Cooker] Most of the kio libs are missing in latest KDE

2001-01-01 Thread John Cavan
kdebase-2.1-0.20001229.2mdk is the version I have. The spec file simply needs to add: %{kde2dir}/kio_audiocd.so %{kde2dir}/kio_filter.so %{kde2dir}/kio_finger.so %{kde2dir}/kio_gopher.so %{kde2dir}/kio_help.so %{kde2dir}/kio_info.so %{kde2dir}/kio_man.so %{kde2dir}/kio_nfs.so %{kde2dir}/kio_nntp.

[Cooker] Most of the kio libs are missing in latest KDE

2000-12-31 Thread John Cavan
In particular: kio_audiocd.so kio_filter.so kio_finger.so kio_gopher.so kio_help.so kio_info.so kio_man.so kio_nfs.so kio_nntp.so kio_pop3.so kio_smb.so kio_smtp.so kio_tar.so This is just a cursory inspection, there may be others. Some seem to come from kde-base and others from kde-libs. I'd d

Re: [Cooker] fix proposal: XFree86

2000-12-28 Thread John Cavan
Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > > This updated package will fix XFree86 running on the alpha (perhaps also > other non-ix86 platforms --> just change the "%ifarch alpha" into > "%ifnarch %ix86") with MGA hardware. Take a look at this e-mail from Jay > Estabrook below. > > http://d10179.dtk.chello.n

[Cooker] XFree86 4.0.2 cores on Matrox cards

2000-12-22 Thread John Cavan
Hi, I don't know if I'm the only one encountering this... XFree86 4.0.2 always fails on the MGA G400 in either single or dual-head mode with a signal 11, though the RPMs from the 7.2 distro work perfectly fine. I've tried the rebuild with gcc and egcs with no luck. Next try is to do an non-paral

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.0.1z-2mdk

2000-12-12 Thread John Cavan
Frederic Lepied wrote: > > Is this being built with the Matrox HALlib for the MGA driver or with > > init routines supplied by XFree86.org? The reason I'm asking is that if > > the Matrox library is used then multi-head in X is possible (and can be > > accelerated with OpenGL). AFAIK, the last tim

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] XFree86-4.0.1z-2mdk

2000-12-12 Thread John Cavan
Frederic Lepied wrote: > > --=-=-= > Name: XFree86 Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 4.0.1zVendor: MandrakeSoft Is this being built with the Matrox HALlib for the MGA driver or with init routines supplied by XFree86.org? The

[Cooker] orphaned packages in Cooker

2000-11-28 Thread John Cavan
Hi all, Do you suppose that something could be done to rid cooker of the various orphaned packages now kicking around? These extras just confuse the migration to the new lib formats. John

Re: [Cooker] ld.so-1.9.11-7mdk reports multiple libc's

2000-11-25 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Meir Faraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yep I could confirm that :-( > > I've also tryed to upgrade it and receive the same message ... > > but I think it will be fixed , there are a lot of thing to be done . > > last glibc obsoletes ld.so and should fix that..

[Cooker] libdl messages still coming

2000-11-22 Thread John Cavan
Hi, I'm still getting: ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl.so.1.9.11 appears to be for multiple libc's ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl.so.1 appears to be for multiple libc's >From ld.so-1.9.11-7mdk. Running ldd on the file produces: libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40021000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/l

Re: [Cooker] latest rpm and ld are messed up in Cooker...

2000-11-22 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > In addition, ldconfig will always report: > >

Re: [Cooker] latest rpm and ld are messed up in Cooker...

2000-11-22 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In addition, ldconfig will always report: > > ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl.so.1 appears to be for multiple libc's > > ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl.so.1.9.11 appears to be for multi

[Cooker] latest rpm and ld are messed up in Cooker...

2000-11-22 Thread John Cavan
Hi all, The latest rpm still has an empty macros and a number of messed up symbolic links in /usr/lib/rpm and consistently prints: dbiSetConfig: unrecognized db option: "db3" ignored In addition, ldconfig will always report: ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl.so.1 appears to be for multiple libc's

Re: [Cooker] We want ext3 in cooker...

2000-11-05 Thread John Cavan
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote: > > from the quill of chavo valdez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If you have the source and that really bothers you just edit it out. > > Then recompile the kernel. > > By the way it should be here : > > /usr/src/linux/fs/reiserfs/super.c >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk

2000-10-11 Thread John Cavan
Why not just offer it as "hackgcc-2.96..." and provide both? That way, we have a stable compiler series for critical stuff and a developmental compiler for experimentation. John

Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96

2000-10-10 Thread John Cavan
Pixel wrote: > > Tim McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've read about 2.96 and after > > experimenting with it I'm dead set against it. > > seems like redhat managed to build their full distro with it, so C++ is not dead > broke. Yep, everything except the most important part: the ke

Re: [Cooker] gcc 2.96

2000-10-10 Thread John Cavan
Tim McKenzie wrote: > > I hope that next time I run that lovely little ./no_rsync.pl I won't see > this version coming in the 7.2 beta directory. If the oppinion of > the beta testers count for anything as far as the distribution is > concerned it seems quite obvious that most if not all of t

Re: [Cooker] rpm-3.0.5-22mdk

2000-10-01 Thread john . cavan
It's the new wait-for-lock patch, it get's caught in an endless loop. I haven't tried debugging it, but as soon as I removed the patch and re-installed the package it was fine. John > Never saw this behavior before with any distribution?! > Of course perhaps there is already a new rpm and I just

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] Eterm-O.8.10-10mdk

2000-09-01 Thread john . cavan
> --=-=-= > Name: EtermRelocations: (not relocateable) > Version : O.8.10Vendor: MandrakeSoft ^^ I think you have a versioning problem... letter O rather than 0. John

[Cooker] initscripts problem figured out

2000-08-30 Thread john . cavan
The failure of the install has to do with the current situation of harddrake. Harddrake installs it's init script in /etc/init.d where /etc/init.d is a proper directory and not a symlink to /etc/rc.d/init.d. So what happens is that when you try to upgrade initscripts it can't create the symlink fo

Re: [Cooker] initscript

2000-08-30 Thread john . cavan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I get this when i uograde initscript(from cooker) > > warning: /etc/X11/prefdm created as /etc/X11/prefdm.rpmnew > unpacking of archive failed on file /etc/init.d: cpio: unlink I hit this as well, it happened with earlier Gimp packages. It seems to bomb out on symbo

[Cooker] Nevermind my last, re: Konqueror

2000-08-24 Thread john . cavan
I figured out my problem... I've modified the WindowMaker menu config to say that it handles the KDE and Gnome as well. Seems that may be a bit problematic... John

[Cooker] Prob. with Konquerer

2000-08-24 Thread john . cavan
When I run Konquerer from WindowMaker, I get: Unable to run the command specified. The file or directory file:/home/johnc/%u does not exist. That's the first time I've encountered this one running Konquerer in WindowMaker. John

[Cooker] PHP and MySQL problems

2000-08-12 Thread john . cavan
Hi guys, There seems to be a definite problem with MySQL support in the latest PHP/Apache RPMs. I've got all of the RPMs installed and PHP support enabled, the php.ini says to load mysql.so, but no matter what, making MySQL calls fails with: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: mysql_connect

Re: [Cooker] libX11.so.6 problem

2000-07-30 Thread john . cavan
Jim Bradley wrote: > > I just did a new install of a cooker mirror, the installation of which went > great, but when X is started, I get an error message: > winbook login: gdm: error in loading shared libraries: libX11.so.6: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > Yet when I

Re: [Cooker] imwheel

2000-07-30 Thread john . cavan
Serge Lussier wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: Amien Salie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Cooker Repeat Email (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2000 9:50 AM > Subject: Re: [Cooker] imwheel > > > Who will admit along with me that the worlds worst sofware maker > (M

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-28 Thread john . cavan
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/xv/xv-3.10a.tar.gz > > > > Location of source. It isn't open in the sense of GPL/BSD/Artistic, BUT > > the source is available and that puts it a cut above commercial > > software. > > In the practical w

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-27 Thread john . cavan
ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/xv/xv-3.10a.tar.gz Location of source. It isn't open in the sense of GPL/BSD/Artistic, BUT the source is available and that puts it a cut above commercial software. I don't begrudge the guy the right to sell his efforts, but at least give him credit for supplying the

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-26 Thread john . cavan
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:26:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > All I'm getting at is that "non-GPL" (which is what the guy was pushing > > on) is not a good reason to exclude a package. Exclude it for other > > Well, yes, that's what I said, but that's not what

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-26 Thread john . cavan
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:32:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Not that I want to start a license war... > > > > Neither is Apache, Netscape, and a host of other packages. Not being > > Well, you're right, none of your examples is GPL, that's true. BUT (big >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-26 Thread john . cavan
Pixel wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Not that I want to start a license war... > > well ... ;p LOL, anytime GPL versus other comes up... > > Neither is Apache, Netscape, and a host of other packages. Not being > > GPL'd should not be a bar from being on the main distribution. > > no

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk

2000-07-26 Thread john . cavan
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 03:34:25PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > We have to at least move it to the contribs (I say at least because it > > falls into the commercial app category (as being a shareware) so it must > > go theorically in the commercial CD's). > >

Re: [Cooker] BM

2000-07-20 Thread john . cavan
Just out of curiosity, why the move? I think I missed that one on the list. Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Alex Boag-Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This has probably been asked already, but wtf does "BM" mean on the > > changelogs? > > Big Move. > > /usr/man -> /usr/share/man > /us

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-15 Thread john . cavan
The kernel module in the X tree is broken against the latest development kernels and the module that ships with the kernel is flagged as too old to work with X. According to David Miller, this patch will fix up the kernel shipped module to work: --- vanilla/linux/drivers/char/drm/drm.hTu

Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (only GPLpackages)

2000-07-12 Thread john . cavan
Pixel wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > no Perl > > nope, perl is GPL *or* artistic, aka compatible with gpl... According to them, it's artistic, "a kinder and gentler" version of the GPL... It may be compatible, but it isn't the GPL, which was my point. :o) I don't know how you resol

Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (only GPL packages)

2000-07-12 Thread john . cavan
Not that I want to get into a license flame war, but a distribution that is entirely GPL is not going to be incredibly useful: no Perl, no Apache, a good chunk of the kernel (take a look at some of the sub licenses), no QT, no KDE, etc. The concept of an all GPL distribution sounds great on the s

Re: [Cooker] Man Page for resolv.conf

2000-07-06 Thread john . cavan
Francis Galiegue wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Don Head wrote: > > > Any posiblity of sticking in a symlink for > > resolv.conf in the man-pages RPM? I spent quite > > a few minutes figuring out that "man resolver" > > needs to be used rather than "man resolv.conf". > > > > A simple "ln -s /u

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-04 Thread john . cavan
You need the Glide module from the contribs rather than the mainline, the XFree glide module contains the video driver for the older Voodoo cards, not the Voodoo3. The Glide stuff in contribs supplys the glide library for general apps. John Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Hi, > > Just my final

Re: [Cooker] More notes on XFree86 4.0.1

2000-07-03 Thread john . cavan
I'm running 2.4.0-test2-ac2 as my current kernel. I'm not sure where the hackkernel stands since I've never run the Mandrake kernel longer than it takes to recompile... :o) John Michael Holt wrote: > > When you say 'development kernels', are you talking about anything under > cooker or are you

[Cooker] More notes on XFree86 4.0.1

2000-07-03 Thread john . cavan
For those who are running the Linux development kernels, make sure that you grab the latest kernel drivers from the DRI site (dri.sourceforge.net). You'll have to pull them in from CVS, but acceleration won't work unless you do. Hopefully the development kernels will catch up. Specifically, you n

[Cooker] Problems with XFree86 4.0.1 RPMs

2000-07-03 Thread john . cavan
Hi, The new RPMs for XFree86 4.0.1 are missing all the DRI drivers in /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri thus causing 3D hardware acceleration to fail. All the other modules appear to be correct, this is the only missing set. John P.S. I solved my immediate problem by grabbing the binary versions from

[Cooker] New XFree86 4

2000-07-02 Thread john . cavan
For the XFree86 maintainers out there... Version 4.0.1 has been unleashed on the public. :o) John

Re: [Cooker] [ANNOUNCE] New macros in rpm

2000-06-30 Thread john . cavan
Maybe I'm being a little dense here, but the original method would seem to be much more generic. John Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > can i use %update-menus for postun too? > > > > > > > If you have a package who need a menu entry, please don't use in %post > > the : > > > > %post > > if [ -x /usr/bi

[Cooker] hackgimp revisited

2000-06-30 Thread john . cavan
Geoffrey and Lenny, I finally was able to test my "theory" and yes, it works. There is a couple of things to note: 1. Previous versions of the Gimp must be uninstalled before building the new version. 2. The perl-PDL package is missing a number of files required for building the perl stuff. I h

[Cooker] hackgimp revisited

2000-06-29 Thread john . cavan
Geoffrey and Lenny, I finally was able to test my "theory" and yes, it works. There is a couple of things to note: 1. Previous versions of the Gimp must be uninstalled before building the new version. 2. The perl-PDL package is missing a number of files required for building the perl stuff. I h

Re: [Cooker] hackgimp and perl

2000-06-26 Thread john . cavan
Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > > I went to rebuild the hackgimp RPM because it doesn't include the perl > > stuff in binary form and noticed your comments in the spec file. The > > they were my comments. however: i remember building on a box with gimp > installed (stable) and it didn't bail out > > >

[Cooker] hackgimp and perl

2000-06-25 Thread john . cavan
Lenny and others, I went to rebuild the hackgimp RPM because it doesn't include the perl stuff in binary form and noticed your comments in the spec file. The reason the perl stuff keeps bombing out is the shared libraries in the perl autoload directory link themselves to the older Gimp libraries

Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group

2000-06-10 Thread John Cavan
I agree, it very nicely indicates software that is in development mode and potentially quite unstable. It has my vote. John Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ creating a hack root menu group for hack*applis ] > > What do you think? Stupid idea, is

Re: [Cooker] So, if 7.1 is now final...

2000-06-03 Thread John Cavan
John Grange wrote: > it is actualy very usefull because say you want user A to be able to access > files in a dirrectory but you do not want the people in the users group to be > able to access them, then you just set the gid of the dir to that users gid , > it's not stupid it's very usefull and i

Re: [Cooker] So, if 7.1 is now final...

2000-06-03 Thread John Cavan
Geoffrey Lee wrote: > > patch the code yourself if youd on't like how it works :ppp No offense, but that's a crummy response to user feedback, a habit on this list I might add. Yes, I can patch the code, but that's not relevant to the discussion, nor can I do that during install. In actual fact,

Re: [Cooker] So, if 7.1 is now final...

2000-06-03 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It may be the standard way on Mandrake, but it's not a standard way for > > Unix... it is unexpected behaviour and you do have a group labled > > it's the standard way on a

Re: [Cooker] So, if 7.1 is now final...

2000-06-03 Thread John Cavan
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > John Cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2. When you create a normal user at install time it also creates a group > > that matches the user. That means I get john:john instead of john:users > > this is the standard way on our dis

[Cooker] So, if 7.1 is now final...

2000-06-03 Thread John Cavan
Is the code freeze off? It would be good if we could start packaging up some of the newer versions of the software that is out there. By the way, I tried the new installation (FTP'd, through a firewall on an ADSL connection) and I'd like to say that it went great. Two minor problems that I saw:

Re: [Cooker] Suugestion for new utility

2000-05-26 Thread John Cavan
The program you are looking for is called "tee". Hoyt wrote: > > There is a way to start a program that redirects the error messages to a > text file. I' ve used it several times to debug X, but I always have to look > it up. Couldn't it be put into a shell script called, for example, errlog, >

Re: [Cooker] Graphical installer

2000-05-26 Thread John Cavan
I don't think that you want to remove the choice of selecting individual, optional packages. What I recommend though is that you remove all required packages from the list, which should trim the info back a bit. John Denis HAVLIK wrote: > > :~>The graphical installer is nice and all, but it has

  1   2   >