I was hoping to install Cooker today...
I choose quite a bare install (bare + openssh-server, openssh-client,
autofs, nfs-utils, nss_ldap) but the install showed this error:
An error occurred
error ordering package list: (no error).
Here's the proof:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 23:50:50 +0100
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
an error occurred
error ordering package list: cannot open Requirename index using db3 -
No such file or directory (2)
took me some time to figure the meaning of this message. The file
I've just done a fresh (2h) cooker install with just gnome2 and I note that it's
very unstable (nautilus, gnome-applets, gnome-panel).
If someone know why, let me know.
I have a big problem with MMboX (it's in contribs, I'm a MMboX dev) too.
It worked
fine with a 2 weeks cooker, works fine one a
Selon Florent BERANGER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just done a fresh (2h) cooker install with just gnome2 and I note that
it's
very unstable (nautilus, gnome-applets, gnome-panel).
If someone know why, let me know.
In last news, I can't start Gnome2 anymore : the problem seem to be linked to
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this the correct file?
According to the logs, you didn't format your / partition, which
is pretty strange if you really want to do an install. Maybe
there is some sort of problem during this pseudo update which
makes that the /etc directory
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
configuration I get this error message:
cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
[...]
Is this the
Please remove my name from the mailing list
Marcos colome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes: tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du: Per Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>writes: I have problems installing Linux Mandrake.
onsdagen den 25 september 2002 15.19 skrev Guillaume Cottenceau:
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
configuration I get this
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network configuration
I get this error message:
cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
can you attach the report.bug?
to get it:
during install, switch to console 2,
put a dos floppy in floppy drive,
tisdagen den 24 september 2002 13.35 skrev du:
Per Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network
configuration I get this error message:
cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
can you attach the report.bug?
to get it:
during install,
I have problems installing Linux Mandrake. When I reach network configuration
I get this error message:
cannot write /etc/resolv.conf
and I can not proceed from there.
/Per Lindström
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 05:13 pm, Roland wrote:
Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
problems.
The md5sums for the network.img in 9.0 beta1 and cooker are different. Could
that be why? I was having problems with
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
- 3com PCI network card (3c590, I think). Anyway, it uses the 3c59x driver.
My test machine uses the very same driver and I have no problem
:-(.
Wait, maybe this could originate from a mirroring problem (beuh,
0%
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:26 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Yep, I'd really like we could fix it. I've posted a request for
testing to the developers of our office, maybe one of them can
reproduce and then it would be real easy for me to debug
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
addresses with the same crash. In the spirit of scientific enquiry, next
I'm still suspecting the DNS resolving
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
not changed at all for the past months :-(.
If only I could have a machine at hands with the problem..
Nope,
On Thursday 01 August 2002 03:29 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
addresses with the same crash. In the spirit
On Thursday 01 August 2002 03:21 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Wait, maybe this could originate from a mirroring problem (beuh,
0% chance but anyway); is the latest network.img from your mirror
the same md5sum than me?
72b12e8fdd829acee960ad73cbca186d
No, my disk has the same md5sum as
On Thursday 01 August 2002 05:00 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Can you try with the following image? It has an option that is
supposed to fix some problems in applications segfaulting with
gcc 3.x.
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/files/network.img
Just tried it. Same thing. install
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, David Walser wrote:
DrakX during users doesn't let you pick their KDM
image anymore, it just gives them them the new default
ugly one.
And I thought: Finally a decent one. :)
Konsole still shows a Tip of the Day, I thought I saw
in one of Laurent's recent changelogs
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 08:29, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
192.168.2.1, into which our systems (between two and five, depending)
are plugged; on both systems that failed I tried DHCP and static IP
addresses with the same crash. In the spirit of
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still suspecting the DNS resolving code. Have you tried in
static IP to not provide any IP for the DNS server, does it make
any change?
OK, you're absolutely right. When you remove the DNS server, it brings up the
Nice, we're at least
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 04:10, Igor Izyumin wrote:
I have several install nitpicks for 9.0beta1. I'm sorry if these have already
been reported; they are not in bugzilla.
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits
abnormally after you
tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Hey, that's three of us having this problem now! Come on, we gotta be
able to figure out some kind of common feature between us...
--
adamw
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Hey, that's three of us having this problem now! Come on, we gotta be
able to figure out some kind of
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
4. Also, I think the user should be able to choose between quiet and
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
not changed at all
Andy Neillans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some info on my setup:
- Local network, one running PDC Domain server running Samba 2.2.3a
- IP Address: 169.254.x.x Subnet: 255.255.0.0 Gateway: 169.254.100.1
- PDC running BIND 9.2.1rc1 and dhcpd v3.0.1rc8
- Mixture of Win2k, 98, XP and
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
gcc-3.2 miscompilation since the whole network code of stage1 has
not
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
You follow it right - can I ask a silly question - which mirror / site
did you use to get
--- Andy Neillans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You follow it right - can I ask a silly question -
which mirror / site
did you use to get the cooker build from?
sunsite.uio.no/ftp.uninett.no (same thing I think)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health -
David Walser a écrit :
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
problems.
Strange :(
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:25 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after
you tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
- 3com PCI
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 01:26 pm, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Yep, I'd really like we could fix it. I've posted a request for
testing to the developers of our office, maybe one of them can
reproduce and then it would be real easy for me to debug fix.
How does one go about debugging a boot
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 02:26 pm, Andy Neillans wrote:
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
You follow it right - can I ask a
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 05:13 pm, Roland wrote:
Me too, I have done a network installation with a 3com 509 without
problems.
The md5sums for the network.img in 9.0 beta1 and cooker are different. Could
that be why? I was having problems with beta1.
--
-- Igor
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 12:25 pm, you wrote:
Igor Izyumin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after
you tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
Ouch, you too? What is your hardware?
4. Also, I think the
OK, my relevant extra info:
Theories about differing versions in Cooker, beta 1, from different
sites don't really wash IMO because I have the same problem with the 8.2
network bootdisk; can others having the problem check this?
It seems some people with the problem use 3Com cards, but i'm
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 19:19, David Walser wrote:
If I've been following the discussion successfully,
people are having problems with network.img?
I'm using it quite successfully with newest Cooker
with both 8139too and 3c905C-TX network cards.
It's not consistent; there's three of us
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 18:41, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is your network card? (lspcidrake -v)
Sorry, I didn't read your other mail at that time.
By the way, I'm beginning to ask myself if we're not trapped in a
gcc-3.2
I have several install nitpicks for 9.0beta1. I'm sorry if these have already
been reported; they are not in bugzilla.
1. The network.img reports that it's for 8.2 and exits abnormally after you
tell it the IP addresses or tell it to use DHCP. Using 3c59x.
2. When booting off the CD, and it
I have
AMD K6-200
on ASUS P55TVP4
with S3 875 Video
gives me:
(console 1)
error opening security file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
install exited abnormally :-( -- received signal 13
(console 2)
*trying to load i810fb module with xres640 (vga was 785)
here too,
I have
AMD K6-200
on ASUS P55TVP4
with S3 875 Video
gives me:
(console 1)
error opening security file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
install exited abnormally ;-( -- received signal 13
(console 2)
*trying to load i810fb module with xres640 (vga was 785)
hi,
I am having fatal problems installing beta 3. I am now running beta
2 and have installed beta 1 no probs so I hope it is not me being
dumb.
OK details.
Harware: Athlon 800Mhz, 512Mb Ram, 2xIDE hd
I am making a bunch of RAID arrays at install.
boot, swap, var are on the slower disk, no
Pixel,
Thanks for the VERY quick fix on the mouse.
Any ideas on the other install issues ? (they also happened when
I used standard 2 button mouse with no errors)
Cheers,
Robin
Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
an error occured: unknown device
Robin Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
an error occured: unknown device atibm (caller is
install_steps_gtk:/usr/bin/perl_install/install_steps_gtk:198
fixed.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, James O'Malley wrote:
Okay, tried it again. Tried all the install kernels and was unsuccessful.
The 2.4.4's came closest. After loading the second stage install, they
kicked me out with a signal 15 and a shutdown. So they exhibited a decidely
_different_ behavior
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, James O'Malley wrote:
Regarding the console keys, I think I had to do something insane like
Fn-Ctrl-F1... can't remember though. I don't have Linux installed on
there any more so I can't check.
Nope not it... tried every combo. I think it's disabled or
What model powerbook is this? You might try a text install and see if
you can at least see what's hanging. I've done about 10 consecutive
installs using my local build and 36000 seems to be adequate. It
sounds like something else is going on. Also trying another kernel
could be an option
don't have Linux installed on there
any more so I can't check.
Like I said, it worked for me, but YMMV.
Good Luck,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: James O'Malley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 4:53 PM
Subject: Second Stage Cooker Install Problems
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, James O'Malley wrote:
Thanks, Stew. Okay, I see that you've changed yaboot.conf's ramdisk size to
36000... I tried to install again on my G3 Powerbook Firewire and it hung
very near the end. I also can't seem to get to the error console with any
key combo. Any ideas
Was just wondering if there was a reason I cannot install via FTP from the
current cooker tree?
I have a powerbook G3 Firewire and have done the following:
Mirrored the cooker tree (successful)
Ran gendistib on it (successful)
Burned a CD-RW to boot the thing (successful)
Loaded gmac.o for
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, James O'Malley wrote:
Was just wondering if there was a reason I cannot install via FTP from the
current cooker tree?
I have a powerbook G3 Firewire and have done the following:
Mirrored the cooker tree (successful)
Ran gendistib on it (successful)
Burned a CD-RW
Hi,
1. Encountered the following error message after selecting CUPS printing
system for install:
exec of /usr/sbin/pdqpanicbutton failed: No such file or directory
warning: Could not remove PDQ panicbuttons! at ... printer.pm line 228
Looked in printerdrake.pm and it seems to be calling
Hi,
I just installed the latest cooker(20mins old), and theres a couple
issues I incountered.
1:HD install freezes in vga mode. I had to use text install.
2:Individual package selection doesn't work. Packages you select and
unselect have no effect.
3.Once installed rpm segfaults. Anyone know
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 06:01, you wrote:
Juhan Leemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to...
for my attempt at installing using hd.img, I get:
install exited abnormally :-(
(Alt-F2)DrakX v1.510 built Wed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
in 8 at all, any version. Even doing an expert
an nVidea instead..
if a PCI version exists.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of L. A. Lawless
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Cooker] install problems with DrakX?
François Pons wrote
François Pons wrote:
L. A. Lawless [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
in 8 at
Juhan Leemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to
move my machines to a common code base, and Mandrake looks like the best
for me. However, I cannot install 8.0 into that machine
What gives Alt-F2, Alt-F3 and Alt-F4 at least
François Pons wrote:
Juhan Leemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pentium. It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to move
my machines to a common code base, and Mandrake looks like the best for me.
However, I cannot install 8.0 into that machine. I've tried cdrom,
I'm bringing up a question or two on this because although it's not the
same problem, there are similarities. P200MMX, 3.3GB HDD, 160MB RAM,
S3Virge 86c325 graphics card with 4MB video RAM. X cannot be installed
in 8 at all, any version. Even doing an expert text install, along comes
the
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 12:42, you wrote:
Juhan Leemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
...I have a Compaq Prolinea 4/50s with PODP upgrade so it looks like a
83MHz Pentium...
Is it a pentium or not ? what looks like means for you ?
[juhan@compaq2 /]$ more /proc/cpuinfo
processor :
. A. Lawless
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Cooker] install problems with DrakX?
François Pons wrote:
Juhan Leemet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pentium. It's currently running RedHat 6.1 very nicely. I would like to
move
my machines to a common
Anton Graham wrote:
I tried installing 8.0 on a friend's 800Mhz Thunderbird box and ran into
some problems with diskdrake. The first install attempt seemed to go
well, I set up the partitions within driskdrake, but I got the dreaded
LI on reboot. Several attempts to reinstall lilo gave the
Anton Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Looking at the partion tables with another utility (Rannish Partition
Manager) showed a fairly scrambled partition table,
what is a fairly scrambled partition table? could you give it?
[...]
Pre-generating the partition table with Rannish,
I tried installing 8.0 on a friend's 800Mhz Thunderbird box and ran into
some problems with diskdrake. The first install attempt seemed to go
well, I set up the partitions within driskdrake, but I got the dreaded
LI on reboot. Several attempts to reinstall lilo gave the same
results. I tried
1) There are still a number of RPMS that are not in the hdlists.
Could we have them included on the (last) CD anyway ?, or update the
generated hdlists to include a later version of the RPM if it's found.
2) Cannot login as root at the console (/etc/securetty is empty)
3) A number of
Hello cooker,
Tried doing an FTP install of Cooker today. One of the problems is I
can't log in as root from the login prompt. If I login as a regular
user and then su - I can then get in as root.
Below are the other problems that show up on booting.
From boot.log
Mar 22 16:09:28 pheuri
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 02:11, Robin Cook wrote:
Well tried doing a clean install again via FTP (DrakX 1.392, FTP
updated as of 19:00 GMT-6 from sunsite.uio.no). Most of the same
issues were there the only difference this time were the programs
that were reported as having install
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 20:26, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 02:11, Robin Cook wrote:
---
I did a clean install too (DrakX 1.392 hd.img rsync'd from sunsite.uio.no).
---
My bad packages list is:
* bad package libGConf1-0.12-1mdk.i586
* bad package
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 22:59, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 20:26, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 02:11, Robin Cook wrote:
---
I did a clean install too (DrakX 1.392 hd.img rsync'd from
sunsite.uio.no).
---
Update follows...
My bad
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 20:26, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2001 02:11, Robin Cook wrote:
---
I did a clean install too (DrakX 1.392 hd.img rsync'd from sunsite.uio.no).
---
My bad packages list is:
* bad package libGConf1-0.12-1mdk.i586
* bad package
Ok, this weekend I purchased a shiny new SCSI hard drive, and tried
installing Cooker on it, with some mixed success. Note these are more bug
reports than support requests -- I've surmounted most of the problems
already. I'm always willing to learn if I've missed something, though. ;)
First of
Hello all,
Two problems - which probably aren't bugs, but a workaround would be
helpful.
First problem - after downloading the contents of the directory tree
and attempting to burn a CD-ROM under Windows, when I attmpt to use the
CD the installation program says it isn't a
John Grange [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
First problem is as noted before , I can not mount My /home partion
using the disk partion utility in the installer, as it is where I am
installing the files from, so it is mounted as /mnt/hd, and will not let
Me unmount the partion and remount
Here are the bugs i have noted as of 4-29-2000 I did multiple rysncs
before install and made sure everything was updated correctly;)
Install Class Expert / Server
using hd.img installing from ext2 partion
System is as follows-
Asus P5A MB
AMD k6-2 380
128 meg pc100 ram
Adaptec 2940u
3com
webmedic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are my observations for panoramix:
1) I had to use the show all packages to actually
install most of the packages I use regularly. If i had not the
total install would have been about 80megs.
It will be fix, hopefully soon (i just ask the guy
I tried a fresh panoramix and ncurses install. It was from the
hard drive and I was using expert mode in panoramix and custom
install in ncurses. My mirror is from ftp.sunet.se and is current
as of about 3 or 4 hours ago.
Here are my observations for panoramix:
1) I had to use the show
81 matches
Mail list logo
