Hi to all,
I would like to remove the label OrderAllowSplit from EcommerceUiLabels.xml and
use the shared one from OrderUiLabels.xml but it has been translated in
different way in those two files.
Can anyone interested in their language to indicate to me which is the correct
one ?
Thanks in
, but then they maybe need more work ?
* Remove all the content box ?
Maybe Marco has an idea ?
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1982
How did you get to showcontenttree ?
Jacques
From: rohit2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it being
Hi to all,
while I'm checking some issues on JIRA I have seen from the on-line
help that it can be possible to add some more statuses to tracks in
details the actual status of an issue.
I didn't know if this argument was already discussed but probably it
can help the committers to see
Hi to all,
I have tried now with last revision of trunk the ecommerce one page
checkout and it gives to me the following error:
org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering screen
[component://ecommerce/widget/OrderScreens.xml#OnePageCheckout]:
(in fact, the
calendar work I'm doing right now is part of that) but we need a place for it
to land.
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 10/5/08, Bruno Busco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bruno Busco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile
screen)
To: dev
Hi to all,
looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that refers
some views that are no more existing.
Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ?
ListFixedAssetParties
EditFixedAssetParties
addPartyToFixedAsset
updatePartyToFixedAsset
Yes, I have declared those old request/view as TO BE REMOVED.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
Hi Marco,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all,
looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that
refers some views that are no more
it's obvious)
Jacques
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I have declared those old request/view as TO BE REMOVED.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
Hi Marco,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all,
looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests
seems to me if a price gets changed that the saveProductPriceChange
should put a Thru Date for that price in the Product price for the price
that got changed.
Now the price stays in the ProdcutPrice so you many have many prices of
one type after many price changes.
Thanks Jacques and Ray for your comments.
I have created now a new improvement on JIRA about the first point.
Marco
Il giorno 03/ott/08, alle ore 14:22, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
Ray, Bruno,
Like Ray, just a 1st approach, my comments inline...
From: Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marco,
New web
Hi to all,
I would like to share with you the new improvements and bug fixing on the new
web pos component that I have in my mind:
- On PosTerminal entity add a new terminalName field.
It can be used in the new web pos login form to see the pos terminal name
instead of the posTerminalId.
-
I know in scheduling it is if the time is free or committed.
like a task may not take any time but does have a place in the events of
doing something. Maybe a tickler to check something.
Adrian Crum wrote:
The TimeTransparency field in the WorkEffort entity appears to be unused.
I believe
did a google on
running ofbiz in eclipse
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse
Note: you should not mix 4.0 and trunk
have different projects.
Sven Wesley wrote:
Hi all,
I recently checked out the trunk (have been working with 4.0 until now).
Everything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did a google on
running ofbiz in eclipse
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse
Note: you should not mix 4.0 and trunk
have different projects.
Sven Wesley wrote:
Hi all,
I recently checked out the trunk (have been working
not sure, I don't use Eclipse.
I use log* in the code and read the log files
Scott Gray wrote:
I've always used remote debugging and it's problem free. Out of
curiosity, why do people run OFBiz in eclipse? What are the benefits?
Regards
Scott
2008/10/3 Sven Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi to all,
I have updated the Main New Features in OFBiz document in confluence from May
to September 2008.
It's not so perfect but it's better than have it empty.
Anyone interested can update/remove the messages wrong.
Thanks
Marco
in the meantime to
replace
all the findByAnd and findByPrimaryKey to the new methods.
Thanks
Marco
2008/9/25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inizio messaggio inoltrato:
*Da: *David E Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Data: *25 settembre 2008 18:36:24 GMT+02:00
*A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Oggetto: **Re
Hi to all,
I have created a document in confluence
(http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Replace+deprecated+methods+and+constructors+of+entity+delegator+classes)
about replace all the deprecated methods and constructors of entity delegator.
I would like to start working on this conversions.
Is
This is the first alpha version of the new web pos application.
I have converted some of the actual services of pos application with a web user
interface.
I would like to get some feedbacks on it.
You can find it on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1965.
Thanks
Marco
-object-method
else
add-errorfail-property resource=AccountingUiLabels
property=AccountingExpEndOfLifeIsEmpty//add-error
check-errors/
/else
/if-not-empty
--
Thanks Regards,
Mridul Pathak
HotWax Media, Inc.
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 31, 2008
Hi to all,
I'm trying to call from a simple method the method
setItemShipGroupQty() of ShoppingCart but actually it accepts only
some parameters with native type double and int and so it gives to me
an error from the simple method.
I have tried to add this method and now everything is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606987#action_12606987
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on OFBIZ-1783:
-
Hi
We are try to create
-berlin.de/pepper/survey/
Thank You!!!
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/survey-request-tp18010511p18010511.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, 2008, at 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will appear like this if you insert the package.html on every
single java package.
Il giorno 17/giu/08, alle ore 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
These files package.html are standard file into the source folder
making working
for the software architects
at Sun to design a cleaner solution for documenting Java packages :)
Jacopo
On Jun 18, 2008, at 8:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I'm trying to start to document the java packages of OFBiz (visible
in http://api.ofbiz.org) and until now I know
://
api.ofbiz.org the descriptions of java packages.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 17/giu/08, alle ore 21:48, Adrian Crum ha scritto:
Why are javadocs being committed to the trunk?
-Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mrisaliti
Date: Tue Jun 17 12:25:17 2008
New Revision: 668804
URL: http
It will appear like this if you insert the package.html on every
single java package.
Il giorno 17/giu/08, alle ore 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
These files package.html are standard file into the source folder
making working javadocs correctly the documents about packages
+1
Marco
I have drafted a brief board report for this month to try to highlight
the main things going on in OFBiz. The draft is available here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2008-06+DRAFT
I apologize for the short advance notice on this, and I'll need to
submit
Hi to all,
Can someone update LICENCE/Libraries Included in OFBiz/.classpath
files because I'm not authorized to do it.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 03/giu/08, alle ore 20:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Author: jaz
Date: Tue Jun 3 11:09:56 2008
New Revision: 662852
URL: http
Hi to all,
Can someone update LICENCE/Libraries Included in OFBiz/.classpath
files because I'm not authorized to do it.
Thanks
Marco
Il giorno 03/giu/08, alle ore 20:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Author: jaz
Date: Tue Jun 3 11:09:56 2008
New Revision: 662852
URL: http
Hi to all,
I put the attention on this issue at OFBiz community level to take a decision
on how we can proceed on it.
Before I start to clean the labels between Order and Ecommerce application
there was a lot of confusion done in the past after the conversion from
property languages files to
. Of course any reviews of Bruno's work in the meantime is welcome.
Sorry to call upon your patience
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno, Marco,
I'm currently working with a person who help me to add and fix french
labels. I have to check translations because, as you
Hi to All,
I'm trying to translate some labels to Italian but I have seen a little bit of
confusion on the shared labels between Order and Ecommerce applications.
For example the label EcommerceAddtoCart (Add to Cart) is present on both files:
in OrderUiLabels.xml
property
Thanks Bruno, also I will take a look at this issue if I get the time.
Marco
Marco,
there is an ongoing work on this issue.
Please read https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1698
Jacques is supposed to integrate my contribution in these days.
-Bruno
2008/4/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Setup Guide on wiki to
see the list of ports.
Raj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible?
If the answer is yes, then please anyone can guide how to achieve this?
I will be very thankful.
Ajay
Hello all,
I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible?
If the answer is yes, then please anyone can guide how to achieve this?
I will be very thankful.
Ajay
+1
Marco Risaliti
-
Hello all,
I've finished writing up the board report draft, here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2008-03+DRAFT
Any comments and suggestions are appreciated. An informal vote (+/-1 sort of
thing) is also welcome.
On a side note: the crypto
on the ViewQuoteItemInfo.ftl into rev. 631668.
Thanks a lot to review it.
Marco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: mrisaliti
Date: Tue Feb 26 10:45:08 2008
New Revision: 631330
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631330view=rev
Log:
Quote Items subtotal are not correctly calculated (Issue OFBIZ-1677
Hi to all,
I have seen now that is no more visible on the order view screen the order
items.
You can see this example :
https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=WSCO1
I didn't know actually if it's a problem with my browser and I have not the
time to look at it now.
Thanks a lot Hans to reapplied those labels so I cannot inserted it again in
the new xml file.
In the same patch I have also some translation into WebtoolsUiLabels could you
please also include those when you will convert.
Many thanks again
Marco
Author: hansbak
Date: Thu Feb 7 22:58:16
Hi Hans,
if it's possible I don't want to lose my last translations inside the patch for
the issue OFBIZ-1619 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1619).
In this patch I have inserted also some new CommonUiLabels.
Is it possible for you include those labels into the new
the main style sheet won't have an adverse impact on the
local style.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I agree.
I was confused by Marco's suggestion too. I mean, I can't see what is the point
in replacing all the tag by
class=label.
This because a HTML tag is obviously
Hi Adrian,
I agree with you on all these points, probably we can also replace all the b
tag with span class=label.
In any case there still some deprecated style to be removed from the forms in
the back end application and still some application to be converted to the new
styles (like order
Jacques,
I have committed in rev. 616746 the new class NumericKeypad.java that was not
commit.
Could you please take a look if it's ok because I have only added it to permit
to build OFBiz.
Thanks
Marco
Hi to all,
I have seen that in application/webapp/marketing/contact there is a copy of the
Contact Tab Bar (ContactListTabBar.ftl).
The file that now is in use by OFBiz is ContactListMenu.xml so can I remove the
old file ContactListTabBar.ftl that makes only confusion.
Thanks
Marco
Hi Bilgin,
I made those corrections into trunk rev. 614003.
Thanks a lot for the bug report.
Marco
Marco,
Here are some trivial issues i noticed (Fedora/1.5.0.12-7.fc6 Firefox/1.5.0.12):
1.Order -Request-Request Items - After i choose a request Items, there is
an error in the console
Hi to all,
I have committed in rev.611579 a different version of the ProductTabBar.ftl
that can solved this problem.
I have tried it into Firefox and Safari on Mac Os X and seems to me it's
working.
Please let me know if you see some more issues.
Thanks
Marco
--
Author: jleroux
Date:
Yes, Jacques also I like your suggestion but I cannot promise when I can do it
because I little busy with others.
Thanks
Marco
It seems that this message never reached the ML
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent
It seems that this message never reached the ML
Jacques
- Original Message -
From: Jacques Le Roux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r610161 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order:
config/ webapp/ordermgr
Hi to all,
during the migration to the new styles of the lookup screens into facility
application I have seen that there is a Lookup Shipment screen into the
LookupScreen.xml but there is any request into controller.xml.
May I can add the request into the controller.xml or remove the screen
I have done some tests on Internet Explorer 6 with OFBiz and I have seen that
there are a lot of css property are not correclty interpreted by IE.
For example if you have a form with an input type=text then IE6 does not
consider general rules like this:
input[type=text] {
background-color:
back office applications would
support the latest
standards-compliant browsers, and not worry so much about support for older
browsers. If the screens
render properly with Firefox 2 and IE 7, then we're in good shape.
-Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done some tests on Internet
What about insert into main.css for the property screenlet-body the overflow
auto, so in this case we will have the horizontal scrolling in case the content
inside a screenlet-body overflow horizontally the screen.
For example into the Store- Shipping Estimated the table goes outside the
screen
sheet - see the Party Manager partymgr.css
file.
-Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about insert into main.css for the property screenlet-body the overflow
auto, so in this case we will have the horizontal scrolling in case the content
inside a screenlet-body overflow horizontally the screen
+1
I'm agree with you.
Marco
--
I would like to discuss with you some guidelines for Jira issue creation.
The idea is to limit the noise in Jira and prevent the creation of Jira issues
with low informative value that will stay open forever.
Here are some ideas:
1) If you already have a
Hi to all,
I have changed all the tabs of catalog details and now the ftl and widgets
screen have the same look and feel.
Please let me some feedback and if it's the right direction because I would
like to continue on the others forms of catalog.
Thanks in advance
Marco
interesting ajax framework
https://ajax.dev.java.net/ (license:
http://developers.sun.com/berkeley_license.html , overview:
https://ajax.dev.java.net/about.html )
Yes, Adrian I move the discussion on dev mailing list.
I'm sorry but was not my intention to made confusion on JIRA issues but instead
remove confusion from JIRA issues.
So I tried to start reorganization of JIRA issues on the following points:
1) assign to all the issues one or more components
is already working on them.
-Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Adrian I move the discussion on dev mailing list.
I'm sorry but was not my intention to made confusion on JIRA issues but instead
remove confusion from JIRA issues.
So I tried to start reorganization of JIRA issues on the following
if another way is possible...
Thanks
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So the INCORPORATED ISSUE is taged on all the sub or related tasks?
on related task how do you determine which one should be INCORPORATED ISSUE.
Like to help were I can on the ones I submit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent
wrote:
Marco,
Yes I agree that in some cases we should use it. I kept some, please
see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ/component/12312085
for those interested.
I guess how to use it is a matter of common sense.
Thanks
Jacques
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jacques
Thanks a lot Jacques
Marco
-
Author: jleroux
Date: Wed Dec 19 08:28:30 2007
New Revision: 605606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605606view=rev
Log:
Classes
JasperReportsJXlsViewHandler.java
JasperReportsPoiXlsViewHandler.java
were missing, at Marco Risaliti demand,
: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will create a general JIra for a config information
I don't have commit privileges.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 12/17/2007 7:16 AM:
Yes, BJ Freeman you can commit by yourself or at least I will wait some
ideas about that from others people
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties Mon Dec 17
12:31:47 2007
@@ -242,16 +242,16 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# PayPal Notify URL
==
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties Mon Dec
17 12:31:47 2007
@@ -242,16 +242,16 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/15/2007 3:45 PM:
Yes I asked myself the same question. I gived up thinking that after all so far
it's the official demo server...
Jacques
De : BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this correct to use the demo for a return address.
should it not be just localhost
, to warn about the need to complete the configuration.
Jacopo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So which url I have to use ?
http://www.ofbiz.org:8080/ecommerce
also if it's a broken link and there are any demo OFBiz available on this url ?
Thanks
Marco
-
I agree with this. If a configuration is missing
Very good !!
+1
Marco
I have added some details and such to the board report for this month. The
latest draft is here:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2007-12
Please vote (voting isn't required on these but we like people to be involved
and aware), and/or
the paypal merchant on the server.
Thanks
Marco
--
is this correct to use the demo for a return address.
should it not be just localhost till the person configures it?
Should not the gateways be in a sandbox configurations?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 12/14/2007 1:57 PM:
Author
Hi to all,
I have assigned to all the issues that has not unknown component one real-one.
Probably there are still some compoment that doesn't correct for some task but
it's better than unknown.
I made those changes to understand where I can help to review patches.
I have seen that some new
that when you have order items with order
adjustment calculated (VAT tax) they are shown without problems, but in any
case we will see.
Thanks
Marco
Hi Marco,
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jacques,
I cannot put a comment into the document New Features Roadmap - Draft but
the enhanced
From http://www.xoetrope.com/partners/list:
http://www.ofbiz.org
The Open For Business Project is an open source enterprise automation
software project licensed under the MIT Open Source License.
Is licence and web page correct?
ya
Jacques Le Roux wrote / napsal(a):
Hi guys,
For some
Hi to all,
I would like to change the document of New Features Roadmap - Draft but I don't
know I'm not able to do it with my profile.
Is it possible to put a link into those steps :
Enhance the integration with Google Product
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1372
Enhance the
(pragmatic ones)
Jacques
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all,
I would like to change the document of New Features Roadmap - Draft but I
don't know I'm not able to do it with my profile.
Is it possible to put a link into those steps :
Enhance the integration with Google Product
https
to a billing account. If there
are no invoices to apply to, the Payment should stay open. It makes
everything else then so easy.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:45 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Billing
for different inventory
types. For that reason, I like it.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:00 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
David,
after reviewing
Nice find BJ.
-Original Message-
From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 11:32 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
before I put my two cents in I have searching the Internet and reading
or
promote
products derived from this Software without prior written permission of
Nathaniel G.
Auvil. For written permission, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
4. Products derived from this Software may not be called jCharts nor may
jCharts appear
in their names without prior written permission
Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:03 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Billing Accounts
A Payment applied to a BillingAccount does not mean the payment is
closed, in fact I'm not even sure what it means to say a payment is
closed
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 4:20 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
It sounds here like you are confusing a transaction (AcctgTrans) with
a journal
Hmmm
Well, I somehow missed that in the licensing. This stuff is so confusing.
My brain gets numb halfway through and I end of just glancing at most of it.
So, has anyone any experience with an Apache style licensed charting
software they would like to recommend?
Skip
I am thinking about the implementation of this.
As I mentioned, I am strongly motivated to make each entry in
AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry an atomic part of the underlying reason for the
enter, say an Invoice creation. If the AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry creation
fails, the Invoice creation should
I would say that the error journal should be a match of the
AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry set so that when the errors were corrected, they
could be easily moved.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 12:09 PM
To: dev
I just ran across this in the Wiki from David concerning Billing Accounts
from back in July.
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Billing+Account
The current Ofbiz implementation does not operate as described in this
document. The addon I partially provided here:
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:47 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
I hope I don't burst any bubbles... but this specific paragraph has
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:31 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some strong
.
Such a shame too because these excellent UI designers are typically poor
programmers.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:40 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications
for large, multi-departmental organizations).
Given your superior experience here (mine is many years old), I am betting
we are disagreeing over semantic issues.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 6:20 PM
To: dev
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 2:40 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
David, all,
I'm really interested in knowing more about the design for journal
management.
I did some research (existing data model
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:58 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
I still maintain that there is no such thing as too much documentation
(unless it's bad).
I'm ok with that. I
What is the feeling of the developers here about using JFreeChart:
http://www.jfree.org/jfreechart/
Here is the GNU Lesser General Public Licence license:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html
that it utilizes. I am writing the screens for an AR collections tool and
want to present the last
See Jonathon, I always said that you were smarter than me.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:51 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 -
/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef
-Original Message-
From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 10:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta
Hi Jim, (and others interested in helping with the implementation
I have the proposed modificatins to implement a real accounts receivable module
finished except for the collections part which I am working on ATM and a SECA
to apply avaliable credits automatically (not really sure if I want to do this
or maybe have it configurable). All the code however is
David
Thanks, I finally get this.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 2:44 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: getPaymentAppliedBd
In this method call ToPaymentApplication is a relationship name,
made up
I agree with BJ. Backward compatibility should be a LAW only broken for a
very compelling reason, note a goal.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 11:46 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: well so much for backward
reason than to remind yourself to design you're code
better in the future before it is released.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Crum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:08 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: well so much for backward compatibility. (RANT
Way too funny. But, then again, a good depate on these kinds of issues is a
splendid way to waste time.
Skip
-Original Message-
From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 12:03 PM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: well so much for backward
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the latest trunk from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk using Eclipse 3.3 and
subclipse.
After the automatic compile in Eclipse, it showed a lot of compile
errors
and warnings. I tried to resolve them by manually adding jar
files from
In PaymentWorker.getPaymentAppliedBd() near line 280
I find this code:
paymentApplications = payment.getRelated(ToPaymentApplication);
There is no ToPaymentApplication entity that I can find. Is this something
that should be removed or is there some plan to do something really cool.
It also
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
