x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Sunday, November 27, 2016 09:29:45 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> x...@freenetproject.org writes:
>> > There are some tough administrative decisions remaining to make about
>> > stage 3, namely which voters to exclude fro
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> There are some tough administrative decisions remaining to make about stage
> 3,
> namely which voters to exclude from stage 3 because they look like a sybil
> attack.
I don’t like this behind-closed-doors-guessing-about-sybil. Instead,
when I read the title,
Hi,
What’s the state of stage 4 now?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
Dan Roberts writes:
> We need to decide what to do with regards to the social media links
> peppered throughout the design. Stripping them leaves the header and footer
> looking fairly barren, and I think there may be some value in having some
> extra social media presence (even if it's little
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Ian Clarke writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 2:56 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de
>> wrote:This, written in a thread where I show a cleaner method of evaluation
>>
>> along with an implementation of a way to see whic
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 2:56 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de
> wrote:This, written in a thread where I show a cleaner method of evaluation
>
> along with an implementation of a way to see which reasoning can
>
> actually be taken from the poll a
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 10:29 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de
> wrote:
> > I’m trying to make sure that the process is ironclad.
> > …
> > scale conflicts about it and there’s a split in the userbase. Therefore
> > …
> >
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 2:32 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de
> > This is very much necessary. Without checking what can actually be found
^ very relevant line you removed
> > and what cannot, using the poll to support decisions is a mere fraud.
>
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Essentially strategic voting means that people choose the lesser evil or
> *give up* what they actually want to *prevent* something they really do not
> want.
>
> So, to end this on a positive tone (and since it fits right now):
>
> https://ww
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:26:50 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> x...@freenetproject.org writes:
>> > On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:43:26 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> >> Don’t bother too much. I have all I found
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:37:53 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> > -> Please lets not make this subject of the result discussion yet, it's
>> > incomplete and potentially includes bogus data.
>>
>> That is t
Ian Clarke writes:
> Since you admit that the alternatives you are proposing aren't better than
> using
> mean, which is the obvious choice,
The mean is prone to strategic voting, except for single yes/no
decisions. Just assume I had given 700 points to a single task. No one
voting honestly
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 03:44:01 PM x...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>> [...] potential malicious manipulation attempts in the poll
>> results I gathered [...]
>
> PSA about Arne's data:
> - The said potentially malicious votes are included in Arne's data.
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:43:26 AM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Don’t bother too much. I have all I found in csvs which are much easier
>> to work with.
>>
>> I uploaded a tarball with the votes and cost-estimates along
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 03:44:01 PM x...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>> [...] potential malicious manipulation attempts in the poll
>> results I gathered [...]
>
> PSA about Arne's data:
> - The said potentially malicious votes are included in Arne's data.
-VFnkc2KN9hsFCsumay2dhbMYr73k,5ObUTp9Sfdiidmm7RyBTzFR0GPvQl5ZzLh0jHsSzXoo,AAMC--8/ranks.csv
Best wishes,
Arne
xor at freenetproject.org writes:
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 05:08:35 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> does that mean poll4 is formally closed now?
>
> Yes.
>
> But I'm currently sti
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> CHK@l8aO0YagdQ4bdPqvjL45MsR2vpzWJ-a-w2wOhK-u5Ho,qxABwPVUloiBoZixQE9wYpcp2ciaeas-cfkzeblVRys,AAMC--8/task-planning-poll-methods-6a3055856f8d.tar
>
> The results from the different methods are printed and also stored in
> ranks.h
does that mean poll4 is formally closed now?
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Saturday, September 24, 2016 04:45:20 AM x...@freenetproject.org wrote:
>> Still, I am waiting for one signature of a core developer to be validated
>> and considering this event, I will not publish the results
DC* writes:
> I think manual language selection doesn't represent a huge issue for
> users.
> If we also take into account that to offer this feature *alone* would
> require us to run our own web infrastructure (which represent cost in
> money and volunteer time) I think from a cost-benefit
Ian Clarke writes:
> Everyone then had ample opportunity to provide feedback, ask questions,
> etc. It's not my fault if you didn't bother to read it at the time, or
> didn't bother to ask questions if you had them.
From how my contributions to this process have been received until now,
I do
Matthew Toseland writes:
> And IMHO the same applies to the wiki: Before we shut it down, we should
> take a snapshot, even if we're not going to actively host it anywhere.
> We can't rely on the Internet Archive.
I have a snapshot of the wiki (but no history), since I've been
mirroring it into
The last paragraph positively enraged me and I withdrew from the
process. It’s one thing to discuss openly but a completely different
thing to officially hire someone external with self-derogatory wording.
Ian Clarke writes:
> Fairly limited feedback, ok - I've incorporated many of the
Ian writes:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
>> > Because why make the devops of a web server our problem (eg. dealing w
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Oliver writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As discussed earlier on IRC, I have ported all of the FAQ content from the
> freenetproject.org website over to our wiki, merged with the existing FAQ
> page[1].
Looks good! Thank you!
To keep existing #faq links working, we could add the
Ian writes:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> wrote:
>> We already have a wiki. Why not https://wiki.freenetproject.org?
>>
>
> Because why make the devops of a web server our problem (eg. dealing with
> security, sudde
Ian Clarke writes:
> But it appears that some people agreed with me yet remained silent at the
> time,
> giving me the misleading impression that I had a minority view.
> I'm happy to carve off up-to $5k of that $25k right now, commission a new
> design
What I forgot to ask before: Does that
Ian writes:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> wrote:
>>
>> > It is certainly true that I'm preoccupied with other things (namely
>> making
>> > a living - an unfortunate necessity for most people). Should som
Ian Clarke writes:
> When I've raised the subject of a website redesign in the past, the only
> voices
> I heard in response were opposed to it.
> But it appears that some people agreed with me yet remained silent at the
> time,
> giving me the misleading impression that I had a minority view.
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 9:22 AM, Florent Daigniere nextg...@freenetproject.org
> wrote:
>
>> The project is in terrible shape due to the lack of leadership, and
>> most of it boils down to the fact that you're just not around (I'm sure
>> you're busy with other things).
>
> It
Ian Clarke writes:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ian writes:
>> > Please be more specific. You've said a lot of things, most of which I
>> > found unpersuasive or just plain obstruct
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> So how about we just try the procedure as is, and postpone requests for a
> different one until it is finished and has actually failed obviously?
As you saw, I did answer to the poll. And I provided concrete
suggestions how we can try to get the most value from
Ian writes:
> Please be more specific. You've said a lot of things, most of which I
> found unpersuasive or just plain obstructionist.
This is roughly how you reacted to what I said. Did you assume good faith?
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ian Clarke writes:
> I disagree, and you had more than enough opportunity to offer your feedback
> on this proposed approach months ago when I first proposed it.
I did provide feedback. You rejected it and accused me of attacking you.
I actually spent a lot of time trying to help improve the
Ian writes:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> wrote:
>>
>> @Ian: can you make a clear statement that this will not be used as
>> justification that we “must” take a given decision?
>
> We are not robots, and we do not
Ian writes:
>> This is the only way
>> I see to avoid providing fuel to toxic discussions about the votes
>> (which already started here).
>
> Is there any form of disagreement you don't consider "toxic"?
Yepp, most forms where people don’t toss around personal insults or
assumptions of bad
Hi,
Attached is my vote.
As comment: When I give 0, that means either (1) I think it is not a
good idea, or (2) the answer does not apply to the question.
I do not give more than 60 points to any answer because I went through
the points and first reduced those which I consider less important or
Florent Daigniere writes:
> "don't be strategic"
> I've counted how many of your "points" got allocated to items that do
> *not* have "WoT" or "Freetalk" in their description... and the grand-
> total is ... 85 points out of 1000. I'm sure that none of this is
> strategic coming from someone
Ian Clarke writes:
> One example that sticks out is this justification for saying a website
> redesign
> would have absolutely zero value: "We have just redesigned it. Throwing that
> away too soon would disappoint the volunteer authors". I find this rationale
> infuriating.
You ask for the
Hi,
Looking at the file, it seems like the value adds up to 1005, not to
1000. But that’s only due to rounding, since the 15 point values are
actually 14.925 points.
The exported csv only shows 15, however.
Here’s the csv, by the way, if you don’t want to open an arbitrary zip
file. This is NOT
Hi,
This is the second part of the proposed WoT algorithm improvement:
## Improving the rank2+ update detection delay to
(less than) O(N), with N the *active* IDs
It is also available in the bugtracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3816#c12219
-- -- -- --
Hi,
This is a copy from the bugtracker to put it up for discussion here on
the mailing list. I will post it in two parts, corresponding to two
comments. First part:
Structured writeup of the basic algorithm with a calculation of the
upper bound of the load.
(from
Hi,
I still have a non-updated Gentoo node on 1472, and I still get 10
connections which aren’t too new. 7 of these must be short-distance (as
by the link length fix), so there are likely around 7*50 = 350 nodes
stuck on a version < 1474.
To contribute to a fix: If you also run Gentoo and you
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On 13/06/16 17:09, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> - The new 10KiB/s minimum bandwidth is too high for some users.
>> - With 1474 few users are able to keep more than 70 connections.¹
> ...
>> ¹: See https://asksteved.com/stats/plot_pe
Prometheas writes:
> We got word that our talk proposal "Eclipse and Re-Emergence of
> Anonymous P2P Storage Network Overlay Services" [0] was accepted at
> HotPETs [1].
That’s great! Congratulations!
> The motivation is to illustrate the capabilities of Freenet overlay
> services (aka plugins)
CryptNode writes:
> I was able to verify this build. Log file attached.
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
that with Freesites we can actually go back in time!
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
> In the past two weeks, the number of disconnects quadrupled compared to
> the time before, and last sunday they doubled again, together with
> doubled timeouts.
>
> This is from the Err
Hi,
In the past two weeks, the number of disconnects quadrupled compared to
the time before, and last sunday they doubled again, together with
doubled timeouts.
This is from the Errors and Refused stats on the statistics freesite:
Hi CryptNode,
Thank you for running the verification scripts!
It’s wonderful to see security taken seriously!
Best wishes,
Arne
CryptNode writes:
> I was able to verify this build. Log file attached. Verify instructions
> are out-of-date, submitted a PR
Hi,
Flircp works again: TheSeeker prepared a patch and I found two small
missing links to get us back to a fully working Flircp:
https://github.com/TheSeeker/flircp/pull/1
The patch by TheSeeker is on FMS and Sone.
(he plans to re-do the commits in a cleaner way, so don’t be surprised
if what
Ian Clarke writes:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z4s0D1M9HL0xCrf1tdaKGm5U3-WJBwRdMSvyj975WaA/edit?usp=sharing
> This document should be accessible via Tor for anonymous users.
I will not contribute to any workflow which requires Google Docs.
Core technical reasons:
- It excludes
Hi,
This is great!
Regarding the report of non-starting nodes, I filed a pull-request to
use the min bandwidth instead of failing out:
https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/539
Steve Dougherty writes:
> * Improve MP3 filtering.
Now I just need to finish the m3u filter and we can have
> Torben Lechner
>
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>
> Datum: 06.05.2016 22:41:28
> An: hyazin...@emailn.de, Discussion of development issues
> <devl@freenetproject.org>
> Betreff: Re: [freenet-dev] Planning process ste
Bert Massop writes:
> I've filed a pull request. Thanks for spotting this!
Thank you!
> → Back to thesis work after that, 2 weeks left to finish.
Good luck!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Steve Dougherty writes:
> Freenet unstable testing prerelease build 1473-pre2 is now available.
Yay! High Five to all involved!
> This adds Sharesite - a fork of ShareWiki - as an official plugin.
It’s cool that we got here! Thank you!
Once 1473 is out, that adds a cool simple usecase for
I get this when trying to access http://127.0.0.1:/Freemail/AddAccount
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.freenetproject.freemail.ui.web.AddAccountToadlet.makeWebPageGet(AddAccountToadlet.java:72)
at
Maybe replace “user friendliness” by “user experience”?
hyazin...@emailn.de writes:
> At first I had the same thought as you and Arne, but the current description
> of "user friendliness"
> made me change my mind and think that "design" is missing.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Torben Lechner
>
> ---
Florent Daigniere writes:
> On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 00:02 +, Ian Clarke wrote:
>> First stage is to come up with a handful of broad categories of stuff
>> that we
>> might want to do over, say, the next 6 months. I'll start:
>> * Speed - Make Freenet requests and responses faster
>>
>> *
hyazin...@emailn.de writes:
> + Design - Make Freenet more beautiful, and make Freenet feel and work better
I think this is partly in User Friendliness. However “modernize” could
be part of that: There are great interfaces from 1990, but they would
not attract users today. Though that would
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> xor at freenetproject.org writes:
>
>> On Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:03:03 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> As cost-metric I would suggest using full-time person-weeks. Reasons:
>>>
>>> - We have money for ~20 of these.
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> x...@freenetproject.org writes:
>
>> On Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:03:03 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> As cost-metric I would suggest using full-time person-weeks. Reasons:
>>>
>>> - We have money for ~20 of thes
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> On Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:03:03 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> As cost-metric I would suggest using full-time person-weeks. Reasons:
>>
>> - We have money for ~20 of these. That’s a number we can easily handle.
>> - Cost is
Ian Clarke writes:
> Well, one important component of the allocation process is to start with an
> even
> allocation of points between all tasks,
Did I overlook that in the description?
> As cost-metric I would suggest using full-time person-weeks.
>
> The problem is that some things we could
Let’s say it here, too:
Thank you, DuckDuckGo!
https://freenetproject.org/news.html#20160503-ddg
Best wishes,
Arne
Ian Clarke writes:
> It should now be safe to announce that DuckDuckGo has donated $25k to Freenet.
> Will follow-up with discussion with my thoughts on some processes we can
Ian Clarke writes:
> I've written a proposal for how we can do this, based on my learnings over a
> decade and a half of managing software projects (mostly commercial).
> Feedback from the core team has been positive so-far, with the main objection
> being that it may be too elaborate for our
Matthew Toseland writes:
> But as you say, what they are doing is little more than a fishing
> expedition, if it's as they describe. They will quickly discover that
> very few people who send 3 requests from an illegal file at HTL 18
> actually have any illegal material on their computers ... So
Hi,
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On 02/05/16 23:05, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> The first few are also shown in an example video session ☺
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8a8em-4m0w
>
> Should this be linked from somewhere?
Feel free to share it wherever you like :)
Matthew Toseland writes:
> You can still do a classic correlation attack: Connect to the node for
> the whole duration of the request and count the proportion of the file
> they've fetched from you…
This might not work as well as simply theory says, due to FOAF
routing. The first step is
Hi,
Florent asked me today what Freenet usecases can be done easily.
I gathered some, most usable first.¹
The first few are also shown in an example video session ☺
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8a8em-4m0w
* No Requirements
This is what we can do without installing anything else:
** read
That’s great — thank you for publishing it!
x...@freenetproject.org writes:
> Feedback for improvement of the document is welcome:
To 4.4.2.1 (Graph databases): Implementing an algorithm at the database
layer can also significantly reduce the cost of operations needed — by
cutting out
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On 22/04/16 21:31, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland writes:
>>> On 09/02/16 08:58, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>>> We can’t keep nodes from leaving, but we can keep swapping which spans
>>>> lar
Hi,
Is there an FCP interface for Freemail? I looked for it in the source,
but only saw methods Freemail uses to interface with the node. Did I
just overlook it?
For using Freemail from an application, I’d need a way to setup Freemail
for a given WoT identity and set an SMTP password.
This is
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On 09/02/16 08:58, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Because in normal swapping, as soon as the network settled a bit, the
>> changes in location should be small (though my nodestats look different:
>> too large changes in location for my taste…). So
ssues and I
> am currently unsure if they are serious threats or can be disregarded :)
> My guess would be that the problem only arises if the attacker has a lot
> of neighbors, but any concrete results reinforcing that guess would of
> course be better.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stef
>
>
Hi Michael,
Michael Grube writes:
> Please excuse my absence. I have been very preoccupied. I am OK with the
> idea that we should publish and am willing to spend time assisting with
> that effort.
That would be great!
I finished my PhD on January 15th (but am actually only recovering now),
so
> the node changes its location to the random location loc while its
> current location might actually be very good).
>
> However, I think both attacks are certainly less of a problem than
> PitchBlack.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stef
>
>
>
> On 08.02.2016 12:13, Arne Baben
Michael Grube writes:
> If nobody would object, I can also check my availability. If both of us are
> available, we could simply both go - right?
That sounds ideal, I’d say :)
Are you up for asking them whether you can join for the Freenet project?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt
Babenhauserheide writes:
> Steve Dougherty writes:
>> On 03/07/2016 05:50 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>> I’d like to revisit the discussion about monthly donations via salt on
>>> bountysource.
>>>
>>> We have an account with currently one anonymou
Steve Dougherty writes:
> On 03/07/2016 05:50 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> I’d like to revisit the discussion about monthly donations via salt on
>> bountysource.
>>
>> We have an account with currently one anonymous monthly supporter and
>> one
CryptNode writes:
> I was able to verify this build. Log file attached.
That’s great! Thank you!
Best wishes,
Arne
> On 3/19/16 7:01 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote:
>> This is the last build to support Java 6! The next build will require
>> Java 7 or higher. Nodes running Java 7 or higher and using
hyazin...@emailn.de writes:
> Have a look at this: https://www.similarweb.com/website/freenetproject.org
> Looks pretty good. It's new that China is in the TOP 5 of visitors splitted
> by origins...
200k visitors per month is pretty good, but we’re still stuck at 10k
users. These are things we
Hi,
I have a working branch with which I can use an m3u list as safe
provider of mp3 files for an external application. It is very briefly
described in my Sharesite:
-
Hi,
I’d like to revisit the discussion about monthly donations via salt on
bountysource.
We have an account with currently one anonymous monthly supporter and
one non-anonymous supporter:
https://salt.bountysource.com/teams/freenet/supporters
This allows us setting actual monthly targets which
Hi,
Please, someone take this horrible mess of an m3u filter I wrote
yesterday and get it to actually filter the uris:
https://github.com/freenet/fred/pull/510
(two FIXME’s for a chaoswar or so)
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Matthew Toseland writes:
> On 31/01/16 04:06, Sadao wrote:
>> Three years ago I started a thread on FMS with the topic "Efficiency
>> of various freenet message systems", where I proposed to implement a
>> new key type (PSK) in order to make a base for creating
>> Now I returned again just to
Hi,
I signed Freenet up for GSoC 2016. Now we need to improve our project
ideas page.
https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Google_Summer_of_Code/2016
Note that the reviewers from Google will start with but a glance. The
site has to be convincing for someone who read 150 applications
before, is on
Hi,
I’m currently doing the application of Freenet for GSoC, and I need to
give a count of mentors.
If you would like to mentor a project for GSoC 2016, please write today,
so I can fill out the application tomorrow.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
Hi,
Recently we were asked in the #freenet IRC channel, whether we have a
copy of the trust graph in the Web of Trust plugin (which provides
service discovery and spam protection).
Here’s the result:
http://draketo.de/english/freenet/social-graph-snapshot
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch
Hi,
Sadly my funding proposal to Open Technology Fund got rejected.
Here’s the text — maybe it can serve as a base for future proposals:
http://draketo.de/light/english/freenet/freenet-journalists-funding-proposal
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein
ohne es zu merken
Matthew Toseland writes:
> Awesome! We need to:
> 1) Implement this.
Yepp.
> 2) Publish it.
We should… Stefanie and Michael might be able to gain something from
that. Maybe you, too?
> Why is reinserting the whole datastore important in the case of an attack?
Because in normal swapping, as
eat to have more math on this, but I think it’s already
ready for implementation.
Please comment!
Best wishes,
Arne Babenhauserheide
[1]: Stefanie Roos[2] showed that efficient convergence is not possible
under churn, but this should not affect Freenet too badly, because
in friend-to-
Matthew Toseland writes:
>> http://stevelosh.com/blog/2013/09/teach-dont-tell/
>
> Right. I believe we already have a plugin writing tutorial?
Nothing which really works. The latest is mine, and it’s not up to the
standard I would expect — partially because all the other tutorials did
not
Matthew Toseland writes:
> A proper documented
> plugin API will help - and there has been some work on documentation.
> Getting WoT working well will help, and better deployment of our
> existing tools e.g. Sone...
Not to forget tutorials which are easy to follow.
To cut it short: This is
Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016, 20:43:19 schrieb x...@freenetproject.org:
> On Wednesday, January 06, 2016 09:18:02 PM Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > It was then that I realized that we had not done such a list.
>
> We do have one from the users themselves:
> https://freenet.us
Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016, 11:28:46 schrieb hyazin...@emailn.de:
> I second Steve's statement. We've done enough 'looking what all is
> bad' stuff in recent past, people already know what's wrong, that's
> enough. Keep doing it - even when done in a very friendly and nice
> tone - just
Am Montag, 4. Januar 2016, 04:27:41 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
> - Not being able to keep the machine online regularly.
> - Unsettling material and being afraid of getting in trouble.
Such info is exactly what I hoped to gather here. Thank you!
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Celebrate with ye beauty and
Nice!
I don’t have much time right now, but I’ll update to testing and see
whether I trip something :)
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Sonntag, 3. Januar 2016, 10:17:27 schrieb Steve Dougherty:
> Freenet unstable testing prerelease 1471-pre3 is now available.
>
> How to help test - three options:
>
> 1.
I asked myself that question. These are my answers. Please add yours!
Note: This is just for listing. Please don’t discuss these before January 16th.
What blocks Freenet adoption?
- Our themes look clunky and our web-interface is slow. Why is access
to bookmarked activelinks slow? Why isn’t
Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 09:34:09 schrieb Michael Grube:
> Bert, don't we provide infrastructure to applications through FCP? Sure, it
> can be imrpoved, but we do, right? :)
Definitely, though it’s much underdocumented. For an example of what’s
possible, and how you can do it with Python,
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015, 04:37:46 schrieb xor:
> While the observation of Ximin and Arne that this could be a psy-ops attack
> [1] does sound sort of paranoid, it is nevertheless an actual possibility: It
> would be a lot easier and cheaper than any other attack. It doesn't require
> the
Am Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2015, 14:34:41 schrieb Ian:
> That being said, I do think the project would significantly benefit from a
> new and much more engaged leader, ideally with project management
> experience, but unfortunately such people do not grow on trees when you
> need them to work
201 - 300 of 772 matches
Mail list logo
