Results were published in our WG report to the Board twice a year.
The Board would then publish them with their minutes in QST.
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio
that most Amateur Radio digital radio software comes out of Europe and
other areas when the regs are simple: Keep it within the band edges!
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Dave Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject
, etc.
There have too many cases when the time on the STA
ran out before anything actually got tested on the air!
It happened to the HSMM Working Group with the 6M OFDM
Modem testing. I think John, KD6OZH, got pulled away by
our AMSAT brothers to work on a transponder or two, so
we had to request
little about
RFSM2400, so maybe I am missing something here.
73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Gray Areas of Ham Radio Regulations and
Rules
Date: Mon
, but he earned his
wage that day! He also gets impatient with some of the
nit picking questions Hams ask, so I am forced to like him (HI).
Vy 73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
- I can't see the FCC spending a lot of time looking for WMD's since the
probability of success in the
past has been pretty low..
( I'm speaking of Wide Mode Digital, what were your thinking?)
John
VE5MU
Bruce, that is an extremely offensive posting.
I happen to LOVE 6M and have operated the
band for almost 50 years. Sorry, you feel the
way you do.
You are of course, in error once again.
The excellent response from John, KD6OZH,
clarified that our OFDM testing will not be
on the AM calling
.
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill Vodall WA7NWP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] legal Mode guidelines
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:18:24 -0700
This is from the same guys that want
the
book 200 Meters and above if a history lesson is needed.
Hope that helps.
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] legal Mode guidelines
Date: Sun
was 15, and I hope
the service survives beyond my life, but I am
not making taking any bets.
This is the digital radio forum isn't it? (HI)
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows-
From: Chuck Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio
Wilco!
You're response has so much class and rationale.
Original Message Follows
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Gray Areas of Ham Radio Regulations and Rules
Date: Sun, 18 Mar
So where and when can hams in the US play with RFSM2400? I'll be back on
3587.5 after all the RTTY is done, probably
around 0100Z March 18, on until 0400Z using mil standard .
John
VE5MU
at 2315Z beaconing on 10137.5 VFO
John
VE5MU
well after seeing Bonnie's note will try RFSM2400 on 3620mhz after 0100Z
Some opinions seem tosay that the mode would be legal in the US in the phone
band as SSTV is?
Will send as many pix as you want on mil std hi hi
John
VE5MU
! They didn't make that change
on there own.
I get the feeling John's code won't handle more than 100 kHz
anyway! (HI) But that still is ~140 kbps. Sure beats AX.25!
And the ground wave range on 222 MHz is as good as on 2M too!
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Walt DuBose [EMAIL
.
But the 6M OFDM testing still requires an STA. It could only go
operation on 222 MHz, which is fine, of course. But first
John KD6OZH must get it to work! (HI).
73,
John - K8OCL
Former HSMM Chairman
Original Message Follows
From: kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio
to a League
website, or other published open source, and then check
with the League's counsel. If he's cool with it, just use it.
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re
you up as users so that you can try a full
connect ..
will be on 14109.5 USB starting at about 1400Z, and will be on for a while
since I have a lot of computer work to do tomorrow
regards
John
VE5MU
down the road.
Such folks are a cancer in what is otherwise a wonderful avocation!
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Rodney Kraft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] legal Mode guidelines
Date
. etc. and all will probably be OK.
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: AAR2EY/AAA9DHT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] legal Mode guidelines
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:06:54 -0400
Hi Steiner
Poor Bonnie!
We are hitting you from both directions:
--some want better weak signal performance at the cost of speed (~HF)
--some want more speed at the cost of signal performance (~10M VHF)
Original Message Follows
From: kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
If you want to have a revolution, first you must kill all the lawyers.
William Shakespeare
Does that include barracks lawyers? Just kidding guys. Keep it light! HI
HI
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio
Bonnie,
If one more so called radio experimenter asks if something is legal,
tonight, I am going to go out and get drunk...which I really would
rather not do. I am getting too old for such foolishness. HI
73,
John,
K8OCL
PS - I found a store that will ship an ICOM IC-F7000 to my address
Walt,
I would rather have ONE mode that is scalable so that you could
merely adjust it according to the demand, speed vs SNR, etc.
Please write to me off-line if you plan to attend HAMCOM in Dallas.
I think I owe you a case of wine or something.
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
Rick,
Now that is some interesting research! More please.
Thanks,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kv9u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RSM2400 / MIL-STD-188-110
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17
it should.
any ideas? and is anyone on 40 or 80 tonight with this mode?
John
VE5MU
beaconing on mil std 3620khz USB at 0400Z
John
VE5MU
I'm up for trying tonight (15th) on 40 or 80M name the place and I'll be there.
will but you on my abonets list .
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: KT2Q
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Email
for us., and please
confirm the modulation style you want to use.
looking forward to this
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: KT2Q
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Email features
John
- Original Message -
From: KT2Q
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Email features
John:
Are you still on 14105.5?
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley [EMAIL
still on 14105.5 at 20:15Z ... doing work on another computer
John
- Original Message -
From: KT2Q
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RFSM-2400 Email features
John:
Are you still on 14105.5?
Tony
At 06:05 PM 3/15/2007, you wrote:
What did Ham Radio do before the Internet E-Mail?
Packet, Amtor and Pactor BBS's.
so there !
Unless you are in MARS...
John, K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] RFSM2400/MIL-STD-188-110
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:29:44 -0400
Just a reminder to the USA
Haven't the HF-LINK folks been using this mode for over 5 years?
John. K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM2400/MIL-STD-188-110
Date: Fri, 16 Mar
Bonnie,
Have you ever used HF-CPSHF?
John
Original Message Follows
From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: RSM2400 / MIL-STD-188-110
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:27:04 -
John K8OCL
The bandwidth limit applies only to the phone segments.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 01:35 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: no bandwidth limit
There is no finite bandwidth limit
Now I'm I missing something - I don't seen to have a problem with HF
packet. But then again I don't use a sound card for it either.
At 09:29 PM 3/15/2007, you wrote:
It still seems a bit non-intuitive that using a 2400 baud rate with two
tones can work well and yet 300 baud packet hardly works
.it took forever to tinker with this new stuff over a distance..
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Les Warriner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RFSM-2400
What did Ham Radio do before
For what's it's worth -
I have 3 of these clocks, 2 cheap and one real good one.
All 3 reset and different times. The good one will open the
receiver at 2am local time and then 3 and 4 if the 2am signal
is misses. Same for my Casio watch - 2, 3 and 4. Last night
the watch up dated at 4:04 but
etc, and the great cooling system
keeps everything purring along
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Natalia
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re :bad PSK transmissions
Hi Guys (and Gals
this thread. We went over the very same thing for
going on 5 weeks last year.
John, W0JAB
Why in the world would hams want non-hams to use amateur frequencices for
email? Why in the world would some hams desire to give up THEIR frequenices
to email?
Just a thought,
Buddy WB4M
Well seems that I hosed that message up.
Sorry list members.
John
Last year for almost 5 week we went over this very same subject.
Nothing has changed. Getting the same comments from the same
list members.
It's time the end this thread -again-.
John, W0JAB
so there !
/themixwgroup
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
--
John Smokey Behr Gleichweit FF1/EMT, CCNA, MCSE
IPN-CAL023 N6FOG UP Fresno Sub MP183.5 ECV1852
List Owner x6, Moderator x5 CA-OES 51
as to how many of the authors actually
use digital modes on the air...
John
VE5MU
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.8/714
.
I don't think we can wait for some new mode with anti QRM features, rather we
have to be proactive in other ways
John
VE5MU
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG
Amen Jose;
Seems all the stateside operators want to do is argue.
Is the plan to go back to the fundementals of this group, or do we set up a new
one
where policy arguments would be punted?
John
VE5MU
At 08:35 PM 3/7/2007, you wrote:
I have never heard of narrowmode only portions before, Danny.
Where were they?
Bonnie KQ6XA
Same here...
I think the use of more then use of more then one
frequency is from the old days of the packet BBS's
so there !
At 09:03 PM 3/7/2007, you wrote in part:
The cw,rtty, data subbands are considered narrow mode,
This is really good to know. It should put a stop to all
the complaining that has been going on about the RTTY
AMTOR and PACTOR signals on the bands. I just love
it when we all can just get along
There are some PSK-31 PropNet station on 10,139.5 dial frequency
1500 offset at this time.
so there !
See below. I just nailed down a frequency, so don't mess with it !!!
- Original Message -
From: Kurt
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
again. The
horse has been beat to death many time already. Get you best
shot in and put a lid on it.
John, W0JAB
so there !
equipped ..
Hunting P3 traffic to make sure.
John, W0JAB
At 05:42 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
A list moderator graciously corrected me. Therefore, I retract the
following erroneous statement:
It appears that SCS modems can copy WL2k ARQ transmissions even
though the listener is not an addressee
If the guy at sea was a ham why would care what type of a message
he was sending?
At 07:42 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
I'm with you on that. Why the ARRL supports what is essentially long
range Citizen's Band or Marine Band is beyond me.
de Roger W6VZV
so there !
Ok playing Devil's Advocate here.
why in the world would the PSK pick 070 any knowing that
has was used for years and years for the auto pactor station
It's like play tag in a 5 lane interstate.
This one I'll never understand.
At 07:49 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
The above is the best example of
Nice try Dave but I'm not buying that.
Again playing Devil's Advocate here.
Why should a ham at sea be forced to not use *any*
mode of ham radio to get a message back home?
At 08:16 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
Because we forget that WinLink PMBOs have permanent ownership of
whatever frequencies
Don't buy this either having played RTTY - Amtor - Pactor,
and packet that was above 100
Roger please don't try that with me - I'm been doing digital (RTTY)
and the above mode since 1970.
At 08:32 PM 3/8/2007, you wrote:
Very simple. Because the 070 frequencies have always been
else in a 100khz segment. In actual practice , very few
SSB signals are heard below 3700 khz
so why not campaign for the FCC/ARRL to allocate 3650 up for SSB and 3650
down to 3550 for digi and the rest for CW
I don't understand why they messed with this in the first place.
John
VE5MU
what about all the ARES/RACES guys that are using winlink2000 ? It like all the
other modes have the right to be heard on the bands
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:04 PM
Subject: Re
using my TS480SAT with both CW filters, can get really narrow on PSK and still
copy.
don't know much about the IC746. can you menu select cw filters for
ssb(digital) reception on USB? or do they only work in CW?
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Dave
To: digitalradio
.
This has to be one of the most crowded frequencies on
80M..QRM Central !!
For those of you who want to play ALE, and are not afraid of any dire
consequences for not using 3596, I'm playing
on 3589. as of 0200Z
John
VE5MU
.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 6:00 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Those microphone thingies in digital bands
It is just me? Recently I have noticed a lot of people using those
wide
I can see using a small relay or transistor network to ground both the mic mute
and standby leads off of a PTT line from whatever TNC/computer connection that
you're using. That way you're controlling everything automatically, and not
having to use any manual intervention, especially on the mic
80m is open tonight so fooling around on 3587.5 with !$!A and other modes
as of 0230Z
John
VE5MU
3587.5 dial plus 1500
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 141A and RFSM 2400
John, I have my auto answer on..
Andy K3UK
On 3/2/07, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL
0315Z calling CQ on 3587.50 plus 1500hz
so push the answer button k
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] calling CQ 141A
I am copying your CQ.
On 3/2/07, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0315Z
can hear u too sigs are weak
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] calling CQ 141A
I am copying your CQ.
On 3/2/07, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
: [digitalradio] calling CQ 141A
Did so, no link.
On 3/2/07, John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so push the answer button k
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:29 PM
on 1807.5 dial plus 1500hz at 0400Z 141A but able to do whatever I can hear :)
John
VE5MU
, and have my callsign in the little box, then my rig should tell you
what your sig strength is.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 9:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 141A
on 1807.5 dial
as a download from
http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm
Be pleased to help you get started ina really interesting side of our hobby
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: va7s
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:21 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ALE
at 1725Z started beaconing every 2 minutes for the next hour or so
john
VE5MU
will maybe try this another day, with Terry VE5TLW and his steppir antenna and
lots of power.
If you see 20M open to mid-north america, send us an email, Terry can be
reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you can catch me direct at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this would be great, Steinar
John
VE5MU
calling CQ on 7075.5 (+1500) at 0230Z 40 is in good shape
John
VE5MU
on 80 , 3587.5 right now (0400Z) make noise and I'll give it a try
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:37 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Need digital QSO to test audio from new rig
I got my
AFSK sends diddles , as in MIXW. Nice sounding? well..
JOhn
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] That pesky FSK RTTY
Thanks Danny and Rick
Anyone want to take a run at EA2AFR on 14109.5 (1500) who is trying out 141A.
as of 1800Z
I can hear him but can't connect
John
VE5MU
EA2AFR and I tried for quite a while to get this running, but sigs were not
strong enough. Could communicate unproto
and also had a good chat with 100% copy using Olivia 1000/32
Also heard KV9U and KQ6XA briefly
another day, maybe.
John
VE5MU
for me. Its so easy Ray Charles could
see it... And yes I do have the same tones time after time
after time. It never changes. I think you see why I *can't*
use a waterfall frequency now.
John
At 04:13 PM 2/25/2007, you wrote:
But- what is default offset? Not everyone has the same thing
Rick
What was the shift used? In the St. Louis area there
was a 146.10 .70 repeater that used 850Hz shift.
Since I have not lived in the area for some 20 years now
I have no guess if it's still on the air.
Danny,
I think that I would be correct in guessing that the sound card
modes do have a *default* off set when installed. I only run
2 sound card modes, ALE and that is fixed dial frequency
and HELL. With HELL I know that I will find other HELL operators
in one part of the band and always tune them
Have a look at Patrick's 141A ARQ FAE mode on Multipsk. Under moderate to good
conditions
this ARQ mode would run circles around P1 and P2 it is VERY quick
John
VE5MU
As far as my other modes, have had RTTY covered for the last 30
years. With AMTOR PACKET PACTOR have TNC's for them. Never
is 14111.0
( not that this supports my argument or anything)
Nuf said, will continue to bumble along with VFO frequencies, trusting that
others can deal with the vagarities of their equipment,
and hope that we can co-exist for the common good.
somewhat tongue-in-cheek,
John
VE5MU
thanks Darrel , will do.
I haven't since I am somewhat linnux challenged tried downloading the software
and the linnux OS on a disk yet.
where is the best site for PSK mail and the Linnux software to fool my windows
computer?
thanks
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Darrel
At 10:19 AM 2/24/2007, you wrote in part:
The truth is that no one used the AFSK dial frequency
Sure they did. Is was so easy to just say the dial frequency
rather saying put you mark on .
I don't recall anyone running AFSK that would call out mark or space
frequency. It was always
The 3kHz bandwidth is dissappointing.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 19:17 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] ARRL Seeks Comments on New HF Digital Protocol
http
be a message
left in the mail box, but Terry, VE5TLW and I couldn't get it going
last night. i'll be back by 0300Z .
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: ALE
I was copying your CQs just
would it not be easy to listen to the beacon frequency
and then start the complaining if there is QRM from a ALE
station.
Look at what Bonnie said and I think you will agree that the math
looks very good.
John, W0JAB
to be regarded with the same love and respect the
pactor folks are ..
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: KV9U
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 14100.5 kHz USB - ALE Channel Bandwidth, IARU
Beacon Guardband
I'm on 3587.5 beaconing with 141A multipsk at 0430Z
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Rick Westerfield
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:48 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Data Mode Activity
Yes, it is deader than Millard Fillmore
.
It is really easy and with a little practice, and experience, easy to tune
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: wavecrawler2007
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 11:00 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Hello group!
Hello to everyone.
I have just found
at 1530Z listening on 14109.5 , short frames calling CQ or sounding
making a little noise in other words...
Not sure? give me your phone number and will call and talk you thru. have
24/7 toll free North America
John
VE5MU
this morning could hear CO2JA, Jose on 14109.5 but couldn't work him with 141A.
Did work him with about 85% copy on
OLIVIA 1000/32
conditions noisy and with a little pactor QRM
will keep trying, any other takers?
John
VE5MU
dial frequency 14109.5 plus 0ffset. Since everyone's offset may be different,
easier to understand VFO freq and look up from there
at 2000gmt back making noise
John
- Original Message -
From: KV9U
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:06 PM
the multiple repetitions of each packet worked in our favour last night, since
some took 6 tries to get thru
since conditions were so bad.
JOhn
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Lindecker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: Re
In other words Tony, despite decades of tradition of having the CW beacons on
14100, the ALE users don't give a rat's butt for anyone except a small number
of ALE users.
and the only reason they are doing this is because they can.
John
VE5MU
Subject: [digitalradio] 14100.5 kHz USB - ALE
countries, but certainly not where
older used gear is the norm.
The IARU seem to have their heads stuck in the same dark place the ARRL
does..
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:17 PM
I was able to work Jose briefly on 20M earlier today
Can't hear anything tonight since we have a cold front with snow moving
through, and just high static levels on
80M Will try 20M in the AM 14109.5 vfo, and maybe 80 tomorrow night.
great to see a few folks trying this mode out
John
a response from the other station?
Very nicely done, Patrick, looking forward to finding some others who want to
play with this... took less than 30 seconds to TX your test message
using the long frames.
John
VE5MU
901 - 1000 of 1557 matches
Mail list logo
