>>Linuxcnc has performed flawlessly.
It's awesome software. :-)
Dave
On 2/28/2012 11:25 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I still have to finalize my control panel. It is still just a piece of
> plexi-glass with knobs and dials stuck through it. :) I would like to
> make up a pendant (maybe using a
I've tried to keep up with what you've been doing with the machine, and
have really enjoyed the videos. Glad to see you're almost "there."
Mark
On 02/28/2012 11:25 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I still have to finalize my control panel. It is still just a piece of
> plexi-glass with knobs and dials
I still have to finalize my control panel. It is still just a piece of
plexi-glass with knobs and dials stuck through it. :) I would like to
make up a pendant (maybe using a arduino uno and usb) because it would
be nice to be able to jog the machine from the other side. I had
tweeked the la
I think you need a bigger, faster, stronger mill... ;-)
So, does this mean everything is now up and running on the old girl?
Mark
On 02/27/2012 10:49 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Random video!
>
> http://youtu.be/U61ub6mtpH4
>
> (we don't like the idea of the probe spinning around in the tool
> cha
Random video!
http://youtu.be/U61ub6mtpH4
(we don't like the idea of the probe spinning around in the tool
changer. So we swap it out manually) Visions of it flying across
the room - even though that has not happened yet...
sam
On 06/17/2011 10:27 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Thanks Andy.
Thanks Andy. We had found that also - but it seems to be a dead end.
we emailed them and have not heard back.
sam
On 6/17/2011 9:53 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 17 June 2011 15:38, sam sokolik wrote:
>
>> this is what we got.. we cannot really find any info on it.
> Is it this one?
> http://www
On 17 June 2011 15:38, sam sokolik wrote:
> this is what we got.. we cannot really find any info on it.
Is it this one?
http://www.big-daishowa.com/product_page/product_21_s-k-fa.php#18
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men"
-
I was calibrating it over a longer distance. 14" (2 7. inch
standards stacked together.)
this is what we got.. we cannot really find any info on it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/BIG-CAT-50-Zero-Sensor-type-ZS1-Spindle-Probe-/310098398900?pt=BI_Tool_Work_Holding&hash=item48334e0eb4
(for $50)
sam
On 6/14/11, sam sokolik wrote:
> well - bought a cheap renishaw probe knock off from ebay. Having fun
> calibrating the machine. the ball screws seem to be a little off of
> what it should be 3tpi. seems to be linear - just off. (we are talking
> .00017" per inch)
That's pretty good accuracy,
well - bought a cheap renishaw probe knock off from ebay. Having fun
calibrating the machine. the ball screws seem to be a little off of
what it should be 3tpi. seems to be linear - just off. (we are talking
.00017" per inch)
Here we are calibrating the probe to a hole we bored.
seems to b
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:48 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>
> Now - yes the 7/8" drill is bent - it was the best enco had about 15
> years ago :)
>
Hi Sam;
A little off topic. I used ENCO for years. I have found www.shars.com
for better selection, price and quality.
Shars also seem to be weaning chin
On Sunday, January 16, 2011 09:54:57 am sam sokolik did opine:
> It is actually a little easier than that. Each tool has a mechanical
> barcode. So I call the tool I want - it spins the chain until it reads
> the right number on the tool and puts it in the prepared location.
>
> You can see the
It is actually a little easier than that. Each tool has a mechanical
barcode. So I call the tool I want - it spins the chain until it reads
the right number on the tool and puts it in the prepared location.
You can see the rings on the tool (the reader is behind it)
http://www.electronicsam.co
Schweet! How much more do you have to do before you put it in production?
Mark
On 1/15/2011 6:51 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> so - here is a video with it all coming together. This is a short gcode
> program that spots, drills, taps a hole. At this time emc pauses motion
> when the tool prep is ha
] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
so - here is a video with it all coming together. This is a short gcode
program that spots, drills, taps a hole. At this time emc pauses motion
when the tool prep is happening - so I modified my ladder so it sends the
tool prepared bit instantly but
On Sunday, January 16, 2011 12:02:40 am Jon Elson did opine:
> gene heskett wrote:
> > Sweet Sam. Looks like the paint is being refreshed also, generally
> > looking good except for the slightly bent 2nd drill. ;-)
> >
> > Since the tools are being replaced in the belt by a different tool,
> > h
gene heskett wrote:
>
>
> Sweet Sam. Looks like the paint is being refreshed also, generally looking
> good except for the slightly bent 2nd drill. ;-)
>
> Since the tools are being replaced in the belt by a different tool, how
> does it track what tool is in which belt pocket?
>
>
This is
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 10:15:43 pm sam sokolik did opine:
> so - here is a video with it all coming together. This is a short gcode
> program that spots, drills, taps a hole. At this time emc pauses motion
> when the tool prep is happening - so I modified my ladder so it sends
> the tool
so - here is a video with it all coming together. This is a short gcode
program that spots, drills, taps a hole. At this time emc pauses motion
when the tool prep is happening - so I modified my ladder so it sends
the tool prepared bit instantly but the actual tool change is inhibited
until t
These big machines running EMC2 are just very cool! Been watching this
big girl come to life since you started posting the vids. Thanks for
keeping us in the loop Sam!
Mark
On 01/09/2011 11:30 AM, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
> That is the spindle collet unclamp. It moves forward about .05
On 9 January 2011 16:30, wrote:
> That is the spindle collet unclamp. It moves forward about .05 inch. seems
> to not be a problem with the encoder setup. (it really was the only sane
> solution..) ;)
You could have machined a cup-shaped encoder disc, so that the
interruptor could move up a
That is the spindle collet unclamp. It moves forward about .05 inch. seems to
not be a problem with the encoder setup. (it really was the only sane
solution..) ;)
sam
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 07:02:59 -0500
"Mark Wendt (Contractor)" wrote:
> Pretty neat stuff Sam! What is that last operation i
Dayum!
Mark
At 09:16 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
>60 rpm 1 inch tap.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLcztAbgEcU
>
>400 rpm
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E3PMooch1k
>
>the spindle transmission has a lot of rotational mass and a pretty
>light vfd... But it works
>
>1 inch tap swapped with a 7
Pretty neat stuff Sam! What is that last operation in that video -
where it looks like that big nut moving laterally? Is that part of
the tool changing process?
Mark
At 07:40 PM 1/8/2011, you wrote:
>Ok - have the spindle encoder mounted.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vvP4L_hr90
>
>rigid
400 RPM with a 1" tap, exciting
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:16 PM, wrote:
> 60 rpm 1 inch tap.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLcztAbgEcU
>
> 400 rpm
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E3PMooch1k
>
> the spindle transmission has a lot of rotational mass and a pretty light
> vfd... But it works!!!
60 rpm 1 inch tap.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLcztAbgEcU
400 rpm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E3PMooch1k
the spindle transmission has a lot of rotational mass and a pretty light vfd...
But it works
1 inch tap swapped with a 7/8 inch drill
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6S-QfmWcsI
Looks very nicely done. Looking forward to you rigid tapping, it is very
nice as a feature, having done so myself.
I put a like on your video.
Personally, I am working on 4th axis right now, I would say I am 80% done.
That said, it is 80% only if no unexpected snags occur. If the resolver
convert
Ok - have the spindle encoder mounted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vvP4L_hr90
rigid tapping works - I will make a video soon.
(having some tool prep issues. Master seems to pause everything while it is
pre-fetching the tool)
sam
-
it seems to track perfectly - but time will tell. :)
At some point we might actually have to *gasp* buy a pair of timing
gears. ;)
sam
On 12/20/2010 11:51 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> sam sokolik wrote:
>> well - we are not 100% sure. We started with a similar sized pair of
>> gears but could not f
On 20 December 2010 16:51, Jon Elson wrote:
> but I'd check the profile carefully to make sure it is not going to
> prematurely wear out the belt.
Considering the drag load of an encoder, even prematurely might be 20
years. I suspect it is something to watch, rather than worry about.
--
atp
"T
sam sokolik wrote:
> well - we are not 100% sure. We started with a similar sized pair of
> gears but could not find a belt that fit them. So we found this pair in
> our parts bin (we call 2 pole buildings and a barn our parts bin.) They
> are XL and we know the we can get belts. :) We think
Almost done, eh? Great job so far Sam. It's been pretty neat to watch
the old girl come back to life.
Mark
On 12/19/2010 10:56 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Last major hardware mod (except for a control panel)
>
> This is the encoder for the spindle.. This will allow for rigid tapping.
>
> Heating
Ok - I was going to volunteer to edm a 'box end' wrench to fit.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:48 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> well - we heated it up mainly for ease of slipping it on. it almost
> went on by hand. it will probably come off pretty easy.
>
> sam
>
> On 12/19/2010 10:19 AM, Stuart Stevens
well - we heated it up mainly for ease of slipping it on. it almost
went on by hand. it will probably come off pretty easy.
sam
On 12/19/2010 10:19 AM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> Sam,
>Sweet - nice job
>Now you need a socket to fit the gear teeth so you can remove that nut
> when (not i
well - we are not 100% sure. We started with a similar sized pair of
gears but could not find a belt that fit them. So we found this pair in
our parts bin (we call 2 pole buildings and a barn our parts bin.) They
are XL and we know the we can get belts. :) We think they started life
as a dri
I've never seen belt pulleys like that. Are the skipped teeth just to
minimize machining or is there another purpose?
Dave
On 12/19/2010 10:56 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Last major hardware mod (except for a control panel)
>
> This is the encoder for the spindle.. This will allow for rigid tapp
Sam,
Sweet - nice job
Now you need a socket to fit the gear teeth so you can remove that nut
when (not if) is is necessary.
Stuart
--
dos centavos
--
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to co
Looks really great. You will love rigid tapping.
i
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:56 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Last major hardware mod (except for a control panel)
>
> This is the encoder for the spindle.. This will allow for rigid tapping.
>
> Heating up the timing gear
> http://www.electronicsam.c
Last major hardware mod (except for a control panel)
This is the encoder for the spindle.. This will allow for rigid tapping.
Heating up the timing gear
http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/timinggear.JPG
installed
http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spi
sam sokolik wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> the drives are what is limiting.. They are 20a continuous and 40a
> peak. The servos are pretty close to an amp per ft-lb. with a 2:1 belt
> drive - that gives us 80ft-lb peak at the screws. That is pretty close
> to what the old hydraulic servos.
>
I wou
Thanks!
the drives are what is limiting.. They are 20a continuous and 40a
peak. The servos are pretty close to an amp per ft-lb. with a 2:1 belt
drive - that gives us 80ft-lb peak at the screws. That is pretty close
to what the old hydraulic servos.
sam
On 12/11/2010 08:38 PM, Jon Elson
sam sokolik wrote:
> had some time to do some tuning. Getting there - I am pretty new to it.
>
> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/testing/tuning.png
>
> That is a .1 move at about 25ipm - the peak at the begining and end are
> the acc/decel. it peaks at .00017. It is a bit
had some time to do some tuning. Getting there - I am pretty new to it.
http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/testing/tuning.png
That is a .1 move at about 25ipm - the peak at the begining and end are
the acc/decel. it peaks at .00017. It is a bit better than that - I
had to
fully auto! (pallet tranfer) could use a little optimization - but I am
happy with it. (because it works ;))
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=objyMqAHUNU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYA5uEwLSTA
right now I have a few buttons on a pyvcp pannel to do activate the
cycles (offload pallet, swap
Great job! Looks to be diecast aluminum?
Will Baden
> From: sa...@empirescreen.com
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:51:08 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
>
> Did a little milling. Needed t
That's got to be a great feeling!
Mark
At 10:30 AM 11/14/2010, you wrote:
>Yes - first cut!
>
>I forgot - this is where the timing gear is going
>
>http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/belvel.JPG
>
>smallest hex.
>
>sam
>
>
>On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:59:27 -0500
> "Mark Wend
Sam, for some reason, I love your machine. Great job and a very
impressive piece of machinery.
i
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:30 AM, wrote:
> Yes - first cut!
>
> I forgot - this is where the timing gear is going
>
> http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/belvel.JPG
>
> smal
Yes - first cut!
I forgot - this is where the timing gear is going
http://www.electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/spindle/belvel.JPG
smallest hex.
sam
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:59:27 -0500
"Mark Wendt (Contractor)" wrote:
> Sam,
>
>Very neat! It's been an enjoyable watch as you br
The gear seems to be made of some sort of pot metal. it cut pretty easy. It
wasn't until we where done did we figure out that it was metric. (took us a
bit to find a belt that would fit) 5mm pitch 9mm width.
sam
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:16:40 -0800
Kirk Wallace wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-13
Sam,
Very neat! It's been an enjoyable watch as you bring this big
machine back to life. Is that the first cut(s) on a part you've done
since bringing 'er up?
Mark
At 09:51 PM 11/13/2010, you wrote:
>Did a little milling. Needed to cut a hex in the center of a timing
>pully for the encod
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 20:51 -0600, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
> Did a little milling. Needed to cut a hex in the center of a timing
> pully for the encoder that will be on the spindle for rigid tapping
> (and maybe closed loop speed control)
So it's beginning to earn its keep, cool. What is th
On Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:28:19 pm sa...@empirescreen.com did
opine:
> Did a little milling. Needed to cut a hex in the center of a timing
> pully for the encoder that will be on the spindle for rigid tapping
> (and maybe closed loop speed control)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW6
Did a little milling. Needed to cut a hex in the center of a timing pully for
the encoder that will be on the spindle for rigid tapping (and maybe closed
loop speed control)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW6eXiMoFp8
this is the hex on the end of the spindle that it will be mounted to.
http:/
Have the B axis hacked together. This is more of an indexer as it has a
72 tooth curvic coupling that the table sit on which gives us 5 degree
indexes.
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/curvicfoot.jpg
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/conversion/curvictogether.jpg
(taken out
It's just so hard to find good help these days... ;-)
Mark
On 10/28/2010 10:03 PM, Dave wrote:
> Apparently these new cameras do that..
>
> The camera I had back when I was 20 didn't do that.. Apparently we both
> need different cameras.
>
> Have you also noticed that they use less fabric in cl
Apparently these new cameras do that..
The camera I had back when I was 20 didn't do that.. Apparently we both
need different cameras.
Have you also noticed that they use less fabric in clothes these days..
Cheap bastards. ;-)
Dave
On 10/28/2010 10:23 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Yes - that w
looks like an awesome machine and a great way to have fun.
i
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Yes - that would be me. I would like to say the camera adds 40lbs. ;)
>
> sam
>
> On 10/28/2010 9:00 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
>> Sweet! Izzat you in the red hat?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> O
;-) Blame the camera...
Mark
On 10/28/2010 10:23 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> Yes - that would be me. I would like to say the camera adds 40lbs. ;)
>
> sam
>
> On 10/28/2010 9:00 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
>> Sweet! Izzat you in the red hat?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 10/28/2010 09:33 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
Yes - that would be me. I would like to say the camera adds 40lbs. ;)
sam
On 10/28/2010 9:00 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
> Sweet! Izzat you in the red hat?
>
> Mark
>
> On 10/28/2010 09:33 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>> pallet load/unload. still have to copy the ladder for the other pallet
>> station.
Great job. Keep up the good work.
Will Baden
> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:33:14 -0500
> From: sa...@empirescreen.com
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
>
> pallet load/unload. still have to c
Sweet! Izzat you in the red hat?
Mark
On 10/28/2010 09:33 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> pallet load/unload. still have to copy the ladder for the other pallet
> station.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xDPqFXo_5w
>
> sam
--
pallet load/unload. still have to copy the ladder for the other pallet
station.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xDPqFXo_5w
sam
On 10/18/2010 8:17 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>I still have to really tune all the axis. (velocity mode amps seem to
> be pretty forgiving - all I did so far was ca
Very cool stuff. Can't wait to hear the good news that it's all up and
running and in production!
EMC2. It's not just your father's hobbiest software anymore!
Mark
On 10/18/2010 09:17 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>I still have to really tune all the axis. (velocity mode amps seem to
> be prett
sam sokolik wrote:
> I still have to really tune all the axis. (velocity mode amps seem to
> be pretty forgiving - all I did so far was calculate the output scale
> and adjust the following error at a slow ipm by adjusting the amps loop
> gain.) (P=20 D=1 FF1 =1)
>
If you haven't done seri
I still have to really tune all the axis. (velocity mode amps seem to
be pretty forgiving - all I did so far was calculate the output scale
and adjust the following error at a slow ipm by adjusting the amps loop
gain.) (P=20 D=1 FF1 =1)
We need to get something hooked in for the B axis. I c
Schweet! What else do you have left to do Sam?
Mark
At 09:44 AM 10/17/2010, you wrote:
>I think we have the spindle/tool change working well. Next is
>pallet change and B axis. This video shows it find the tool - rapid
>to the g30 home tool change position - then spindle orient and then
>tr
Great job. Looks like it is coming right along.
Will Baden
> From: sa...@empirescreen.com
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:44:45 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
>
> I think we have the s
Seconded. Amazing machine and progress.
i
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
> sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
>> I think we have the spindle/tool change working well. Next is pallet change
>> and B axis. This video shows it find the tool - rapid to the g30 home tool
>> change
sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
> I think we have the spindle/tool change working well. Next is pallet change
> and B axis. This video shows it find the tool - rapid to the g30 home tool
> change position - then spindle orient and then transfer the tool.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KplU8hk
I think we have the spindle/tool change working well. Next is pallet change
and B axis. This video shows it find the tool - rapid to the g30 home tool
change position - then spindle orient and then transfer the tool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KplU8hkI0AQ
sam
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:38:34
Things are coming together. Very happy with the results so far. There are
some little issues that we have been running into - mostly mechanical. Right
now we are trying to figure out why the Y axis ways are not oiling. Looks like
some of the channels are plugged - plus some of the pressures/
Sam,
No goofing around allowed, this is serious stuff! Looks
like things are coming together for you. Damn, I wish I could play
with big toyls like that or Stuart's.
Mark
At 08:24 PM 10/9/2010, you wrote:
>more goofing around. got a good start on the spindle hal
>component. It see
more goofing around. got a good start on the spindle hal component. It seems
to shift correctly (16 speed gearbox) this video runs through all the gears for
about 10 seconds a piece. Every other speed is ccw. (just testing that also)
the bottom 4 of the top 4 black ssr's control the 4 shift
Very cool! That's definitely a good sized machine!
mark
On 10/06/2010 09:17 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>Worked a bit on the tool changer arm.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovxW8TKBGWU
>
> sam
>
> On 10/5/2010 10:15 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>
>> 3 axis moving! ;)
>>
>> http://www.youtu
Worked a bit on the tool changer arm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovxW8TKBGWU
sam
On 10/5/2010 10:15 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>3 axis moving! ;)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOHL_KlUdqw
>
> sam
>
> On 9/6/2010 11:38 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>> 2 axis moving!
>>
>> http://www.youtu
Very neat!
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:15 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> 3 axis moving! ;)
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOHL_KlUdqw
>
> sam
>
> On 9/6/2010 11:38 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>> 2 axis moving!
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
>>
>> sam
>>
>> On 8/26/2010 4:38 PM, sa...
3 axis moving! ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOHL_KlUdqw
sam
On 9/6/2010 11:38 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>2 axis moving!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
>
> sam
>
> On 8/26/2010 4:38 PM, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
>> Well - I fail at copy and paste...
>>
>> this should w
That thing's a beast!
Mark
On 09/06/2010 01:28 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Looks REALLY impressive and BIG!
>
> - Igor
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
>
>> 2 axis moving!
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
>>
>> sam
>>
>> On 8/26/2010 4:38 PM, sa...@e
Nice
--
dos centavos
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
___
Very cool. What are you going to cut on that beast or do you know yet?
By the way, re: vintage 60s picture, do you wear a tie under your lab coat when
you operate it? :-)
-Tom
On Sep 6, 2010, at 12:38 PM, sam sokolik wrote:
> 2 axis moving!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
>
Looks REALLY impressive and BIG!
- Igor
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:38 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> 2 axis moving!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
>
> sam
>
> On 8/26/2010 4:38 PM, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
>> Well - I fail at copy and paste...
>>
>> this should work better.
>>
>
2 axis moving!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU_O_Z7Vv8c
sam
On 8/26/2010 4:38 PM, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
> Well - I fail at copy and paste...
>
> this should work better.
>
> I thought I would give an update on our ongoing project.
>
> This is a 60's vintage NC that used hydraulic ser
these servos used to be driven by a large scr drive. They reach their maximum
rpm at 150v and will handle much more current than we are throwing at it (they
work out to about 1A per ft-lb
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/servotag.JPG
http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/DSC_0242.JPG
Othe
That is awesome!, loved the video!
-Original Message-
From: sa...@empirescreen.com [mailto:sa...@empirescreen.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 5:38 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
Well - I fail at
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 16:38 -0500, sa...@empirescreen.com wrote:
> Well - I fail at copy and paste...
Details ... details.
Kool project. That should be a fun machine with all of it functioning.
EMC2 with servos should nicely outperform the original.
Thanks for sharing.
I've got a couple
u, 26 Aug 2010 16:38:18 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Kearney and Trecker Milwaukeematic IIIb progress
>
> Well - I fail at copy and paste...
>
> this should work better.
>
> I thought I would give an update on our ongoing project.
>
> This is a 60's
Looks like an awesome machine and a very fun project, but most of your
picture URLs are bad.
i
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:27 PM, wrote:
> I thought I would give an update on our ongoing project.
>
> This is a 60's vintage NC that used hydraulic servos. we are converting it
> to EMC2 using not
Well - I fail at copy and paste...
this should work better.
I thought I would give an update on our ongoing project.
This is a 60's vintage NC that used hydraulic servos. we are converting it to
EMC2 using not quite as old Inland servos. (80's vintage) they are 8 brush low
rpm high torque.
I thought I would give an update on our ongoing project.
This is a 60's vintage NC that used hydraulic servos. we are converting it to
EMC2 using not quite as old Inland servos. (80's vintage) they are 8 brush low
rpm high torque. (with the amc drives we are using - it will be 40ft-lbs
peak
89 matches
Mail list logo
