. Is this my problem or should I be looking
somewhere else?
Thanks,
Robert
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
390. Is this my problem or should I be looking
somewhere else?
Thanks,
Robert
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
There are unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of the list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reasoner, Bob (PHES)
Sent: 08 January 2004 22:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want to sound like a
All,
We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no
connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an
empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where
all objects live). The Exchange
boxes are set up the same. We're not familiar with Groupwise and
haven't gotten alot of help from the Vendor's IT dept thus far.
Any ideas? BTW, all other mail goes without any problems. It's just this
one site.
Thanks,
Robert
_
List
If my users needed to access mail that was older than 2 years I'd design an Exchange
setup that gave them the space they needed to store this stuff.
PSTs are unreliable
PSTs are expensive (e.g. cost of supporting them, disk and backup tape space as they
break SIS)
I think this is all covered
)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5 - Active Directory
All,
We just finished migrating all of our Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange
2000, and are still in mixed mode. I have my 3
for?
Besides, you can dumb down 2000 OWA to make it feel like 5.5
OWA (that's
what Netscape browsers see when they connect to 2000 OWA)
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA 5.5
as you are confusing the issue.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees
Sent: 06 January 2004 10:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: getting heaps
Amen brother. Testify. That's why I don't use it. Would love to though.
I know that businesses are not charities, I'm not asking them to give us everything
for free because we are an educational establishment, but based on the licence models
that are presented to us, I can only conclude that
All,
We just finished migrating all of our Exchange 5.5 servers to Exchange 2000, and are
still in mixed mode. I have my 3 original OWA 5.5 servers online, pointing to an
Active Directory servers for lookups. I also have 3 Exchange 2000 Front End servers
online serving up OWA 2000. And to
Yes of course it can.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
/SVR2K
Am I allowed to apologise then?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
You are not allowed to thank Robert
!
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
Shhh don't worry about him. He's just jealous that Windows Server MVPs
I don't know about that...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto
Perhaps you should get a refund on your list subscription fees.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 December 2003 15:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
I disagree. I
at the crossroads at midnight.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources of outages
Would you like a free pen, and some notepaper?
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior
So Microsoft are unethical because they accepted payments from you?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: 17 December 2003 20:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Yes, we pay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
Sent: 17 December 2003 21:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
And, in the interest of full disclosure, two of the three
accolades in
my signature
6.5
I thought Hawaii banned unions?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4
Would you like a free pen, and some notepaper?
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 22:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sources
*drinks beer*
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 December 2003 16:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Damn, I deleted mine and emptied the recycle bin; I have no
backups. What should I do now?
-Original Message-
on what you
said, and then saves it, then the server will hold one copy of his
altered mail for him and 1 other copy for the other 999 people.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Quite so, thanks for the clarification Roger.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 12:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
to remember when dealing with
multiple servers.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15
I'd say that's spam. There is a lot of argument about what exactly spam is, and I
would say this falls under the definition I use - unsolicited, commercial, bulk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2003 12:54
To: Exchange
to a luxury car.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
RM Eunt Domus
-Original Message-
From: Sean Faust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 December 2003 14:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Processing by Exchange vs. SendMail
Good
How do I allow Inbound SMTP traffic directed to an outside IP Address. In Exchange
5.5, it was done by adding the outside interface in the routing tab of the Internet
Mail Service Connection and then adding a SMTP address to the recipient with that
outside address as the domain.
Thanks,
Bob C.
All,
First I would like to thank all who responded to my secure e-mail thread
last week. Looks like we will be looking into Tumbleweed for the possible
solution...
Now for the question. We are to a point now in our upgrade Project from 5.5
to 2000 that we are replacing our current 5.5 outbound
on that queue and Enumerate messages. Then you will be able to
sort them as well.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:12 PM
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good.
Questions:
What operating system are you running it on?
Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own?
If it needs another, what do you suggest?
Thanks,
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor
Thanks for the info. I'm loading up a server right now to test.
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
missed any recent discussions on the
matter. Translation - please don't hammer me for asking what may seem to be a
redundant question. I don't mind doing my homework but don't know what products are
out there and worth looking into.
Thanks,
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
All,
Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked
with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done
some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that
look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any
for? Encryption?
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Secure E-Mail
All,
Just wondering
I think you are missing the point of my statement - when I stated no user
interaction I am referring to not having the requirement of the attorney
having to do anything special prior to sending the message (as with client
side certs - where the attorney has to hit the encrypt button on his
toolbar
Technology Consultant
Information Technology Division, PACCAR Inc.
480 Houser Way North, Renton Wa., 98055
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( 425.254.4845
) 425.681.4190
2 425.793.6000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Miller, Robert
, October 28, 2003 4:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail
Why do they want encryption? Is truly so it cant be sniffed
over the wire or
is it more that they don't want email to fall into the wrong hands?
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL
Anybody out there using NetMeeting with Exchange 5.5? We've never used it
before, and were looking for a way for several people to communicate without
having to type in the computer name. Perhaps a user name or E-mail
address? Anybody know if that's possible?
Thanks.
Robert
All,
We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65 offices around the
world. We are currently in the process of moving from 5.5 to 2000. We have 3
main HUB sites (Chicago, London, Hong Kong). The hubs have the biggest pipes
into the cloud (Chicago - 4MB, London 2MB, Hong Kong 2MB). All
Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Miller, Robert
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Routing
All,
We have a fully meshed network (IP Cloud) connecting 65
offices
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Miller, Robert
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Routing
Each office/location
All,
We are in the process of moving from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (SP3, May
Post SP3 rollup). We have 3 Regional Hubs to which all outbound SMTP traffic
is routed through from downstream offices. My Team is getting numerous
complaints of external clients receiving the winmail.dat files
All,
I have an inbound SMTP Exchange 2000 server (SP3 with the May rollup) that I
enabled circular logging on and restarted the IS. For some reason the
setting is not being enforced as the partition on which the logs are homed
filled up last night and dis-mounted the Store. I even verified
will not take the
change.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Circular Logging in Exchange 2000
SMTP Exchange 2000 server.
Robert, care to clarify? Does this server host
?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 4:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange
Have you read the description of how the virus works?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2003 13:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, but I checked all my servers, they're clean, scanmail is
up to date
My biggest problem is the amount of jerk-off sellers.
We asked for
i) a san
ii) some direct-attatched external storage
The amount of vendors who took those comments on board, asked what we wanted them for,
and then promptly quoted for a NAS device was quite depressing. Idiots.
being 200% better than ArcServe 7 is like being taller than the dwarf from the austin
powers films.
-Original Message-
From: Henry, Christopher M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 19/09/2003 13:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Hello all,
is there any way that you can delete all items in people's mailboxes from the Exchange
System Manager 2000? if you cant in the exchange system manager, what is the best way
to do this?
thanks for the help...
Bob C.
The one about hijacking threads and thinking the world revolves around you?
Try googling on Net etiquette or Netiquette.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 15/09/2003 21:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Isn't the best brick level backup software like try to see the funny side of your
compound leg fracture
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Shimmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 16/09/2003 14:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject:
know where MEC is this year?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?
The one
yes. What was the problem again?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/09/2003 18:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
The people you have spoken to are crack smoking maniacs, not an ISP support team.
4xx is a temporary error. This is an invitation to try again later. This is what you
have.
5.xx would be a fatal error; give up sending email bub it ain't going to happen. You'd
see this if they'd deleted the
to use a target's second or third MX host. That way, their deluge doesn't
have to compete with every one else's traffic.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:01 AM
Hi Everyone.
im runnig exchange 2000 on a dell 6650 server and windows 2000 advanced server. i
have the /3 GB switch on the boot.ini and the specs on the server are the following:
Dual XEON 1.60Ghz Processors
3 Gigs RAM
OS RAID 1 (9 gig)
Log Files RAID 1 (18 gig)
IS Drive RAID 5 (140 gigs)
???
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Chyka Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Paging File Question
Hi Everyone.
im runnig exchange 2000
Why does the idea of a security product that does stuff without telling you what
worry me?
I've been using GFI languard. I like it but don't have a big baseline of similar
things to compare it with.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
crap your system out.
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem deleting e-mails
When I launch outlook, I see the messages
I'm telling you, MDBVU32 will suck it right out. It's a MSFT utility, I think it comes
on the Exchange disk. It would be nice to know what caused it, but this will get rid
of it.
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
713) 532-4999
-Original Message
that it will.
As someone wise on this list has mentioned, technology is
not a cure
for bad behavior. A 2x4, however, is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
That or refuse SMTP connections from their IP address.
Or better still do that and THEN kill the user. Seriously, this is a
behavioural problem is it not? Isn't this a matter for whatever passes
for a discipline process at 'ubl.com.pk'?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
With Exchange 5.5, can I export a distribution list somehow to use
as a new Global Group? We have a distribution list with 400+
names in it, and we would like to create a Global Group with the
same individuals. Is there an easier way than just adding them
manually one at a time?
Thanks.
Robert
Thanks sir.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Distribution List exportation
Hi Robert:
You may want to check out SmartDL from Imanami. SmartDL has an import
option
anybody seen this issue?
Thanks
Robert
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message
contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney
client privileged or constitute inside information
We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary?
Does everybody else use it?
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Using newprof
That always catches me out when I set up and then lock down a new front
end server. Always good for a chuckle that one.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 August 2003 15:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Owa Not displaying mails with . in
That's why we suggest a VPN.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2003 23:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook to Exchange over VPN issues
FYI,
I've seen instances where it was required to open up port TCP
135 in
Well you certainly are persuasive.
*plonk*
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2003 14:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
What an asshole
Thank you,
Mitchell D. Lawrence
Network
I try to lead by example.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2003 15:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
And so it begins...
At least Robert spelled *plonk* correctly... G
-Original Message
Has anyone had any experience with this product? It looks like enough for my org. I
don't know that I need to subscribe to a blacklist but if I can create my own
blacklist for my org it would be a good start.
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
this?
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
or send all mail through a smart host
but what I want to do is use DNS and send only certain mail through a relay (by
domain).
Can you get me any closer?
Thanks,
Robert Blomquist
Supervisor of Information Technology
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Its probably worth noting that installing the same scanner in 3 places is not 3 layers
of protection, its the same layer of protection 3 times. Not quite the same thing.
If your vendor's scanner engine has a problem picking up a certain type of malware, or
their dat files are slow in coming,
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 August 2003 14:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Storage limts not working
Exchange 2k sp3. A user went over our storage limits and cant send. I
changed her account so she doesn't have any limits until
Outlook
closes the
message automatically.
Some of them receive the message more frequently. Maybe the two issues
aren't related,
but I thought I'd start here, since it's the only thing that's changed
recently. Is anybody else
having issues using XP Professional with Exchange 5.5?
Thanks.
Robert
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=booksfield-ke
ywords=Exchange%202000%20serversearch-type=ssbq=1/103-9450502-5588605
Buy some.
Read the ones you buy.
Two best Exchange support resources you will ever need
Http://support.microsoft.com
Http://www.google.com
We're all
marvin the martian
Wheres the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!
/marvin the martian
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 18/08/2003 20:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Without wanting to insult you or anything, you do realise that domain admin and
exchange admin have nothing to do with each other generally speaking? If you've
changed things so this isn't the case here fine, but the two don't go together as a
matter of course.
-Original
Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were having
trouble with a machine or two running that nice friendly RPC-exploit
exploiting worm. No real reason other than half the world seems to be
having problems with it.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus
: pipe dream or possible
But I have a firewall! :)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: pipe dream or possible
Well if it just started in the past few days I'd guess you were
Holy crap. That script worked great.
Thanks!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Address Lists
I've got a script that does that: (link might wrap)
http
To keep a long story short, I need to try and export all the SMTP addresses
out of our Exchange 5.5
Server in to some type of Excel Spreadsheet/Word Document/whatever file.
Can this be done without
exporting a bunch of unnecessary data, or can it be done at all?
Thanks!
Robert
All,
Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out
Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300
users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain
Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works
All,
Quick question on the OAB generation in Exchange 2000. In ESM under Offline
Address Lists I have a Default Offline Address Lists, being generated by
one of the Exchange 2000 servers. I have 70 servers spread across the globe
- in 60 Administrative groups (still in mixed mode with 5.5).
Hello everone,
finally got the boss at a side job to scrap MS Proxy 2.0 and put a PIX 515 in.
Exchange 5.5 is running on the same box as Proxy 2.0. i removed Proxy 2.0 and now OWA
5.5 does not work thru my PIX. i have a NAT translation configured for our mail
server and have tcp ports 25
Try this link for starters.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B326856
From: Chyka Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls
Date: Mon, 23
Well I work at an educational institution myself which may be bigger or smaller than
yours, I don't know and I don't think it matters. We dealt with the problem by
upgrading to Exchange 2000. Exchange 5.5 is what, six years old now, and hasn't seen a
lot of new development work since Exchange
Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 13/06/2003 21:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: How do You guys/gals handle this: OWA Hanging.
Robert, thanks for the input, we are in the 1st phase of our 2k migration
Really? I'd just delete their account from the network if it was
internal email, or I'd block their whole domain if it was external. We
have rules here against that kind of abuse.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:32
To: Exchange
for the first
time, and so on, so its not like its going to get worse.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
Senior IT Systems Engineer
Luton Sixth Form College
print chr(66) chr(79) chr(70) chr(72)
_
List posting FAQ: http
I get that a lot too
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 12/06/2003 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Yes a duck is pecking my
Isn't this all just another re-hash of the line in the SMTP rfc about being liberal
about what you accept but strict about what you send?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/06/2003 21:12
To: Exchange Discussions
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Good morning,
Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants
to know why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange
2003/Outlook 2003. I
I thought he nailed the answer pretty well: White Space and the reported mailbox sizes
are often inaccurate.If thats not it you'll prolly need to give us a bit more info.
Have you recently made a big change to the load on the server, e.g. deleted a lot of
mailboxes?
-Original
be the
original email but the damage would be done because I presume what you
really want to protect is the content of these emails, not the random
collection of bits and bytes that were scraped together to take the
content out of the author's mind and put it on screen.
--
Robert Moir
Microsoft MVP
*sigh* 2 minutes searching the microsoft website.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;272290
-Original Message-
From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 16:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Is it true that OL2K can't redirect to the new GC once
I don't think its a case of Fixing anything as much as Exchange server being a
scenario where clustering generally offers a very poor return on the investment in
time and money you spend setting one up and tweaking it. Quite a lot of errors I've
seen with exchange relate to people doing stupid
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
