RE: Strange problem

Title: Strange problem Yes.   C:\>nslookup x.xx.xxxServer:  Address:  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   Non-authoritative answer:Name:    x.xx.xxxAddress:  xx.xxx.xxx.xxx -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31,

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Recently I have archived about 50 mailboxes ,  and hence I want to defrag , because the space freed is not showing up on the exchange database , it still remains the same . -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, Octob

RE: Upgrade from Windows 98 SE to Win2k - missing .pst file

Thanks for the insight, but I checked all servers this user maps to.  Of course, as luck would have it, these servers are at remote locations, so I had to have other staff check.  And take their word for it that they did indeed check. >From: Sean Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "MS-Exchange

RE: Help Security Breach!

The way I can tell they are being read is that I have given another employee access to the mailbox and he has watched as emails turn from unread to read. I have looked at the event log but it doesn't seem to have much in it... i assume that is because I haven't enabled much in the way of logging.

RE: Help Security Breach!

How do you know they are being read? If they are, are there any other employees who have admin access. Have you checked the event log on the Exch server? -Original Message- From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue

Help Security Breach!

Hi guys, Scenario NT4 ps6a exchange 5.5 sp4 netgear FR314 firewall with only ports 25 and 80 open. Just seem to be having a security issue. email appears to be being read from a users account who is no longer an employee. I have disable his account, taking him out of the OWA users gro

RE: Upgrade from Windows 98 SE to Win2k - missing .pst file

Could it be that the data was stored in .pst on a server and not the pc?   Regards,Sean Martin, MCSENetwork AdministratorRibelin Lowell & CompanyInsurance Brokers, Inc.3111 C Street, Suite 300Anchorage, Alaska 99503Ph: (907) 561-1250Fax: (907) 561-4315Cell: (907) 229-0885Email: [EMAIL PROT

Upgrade from Windows 98 SE to Win2k - missing .pst file

I upgraded a station from Win98 to Win2k.  I made the fatal assumption that all contacts and other Outlook data were stored at the Exchange Server in the Information Store.  After reattaching to Exchange, I could not find any of the contacts or other data.  I'm assuming the Outlook was directing th

RE: Manual DB maintenance

Title: Message You're still going to need more drive space.   Eseutil is the utility that will recover that white space for you, but only temporarily. If you've been paying attention to the list (today especially), it's suggested only to be run after contacting PSS. It's a dangerous utility

Re: IIS ?

Cool thanks. Matt - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: RE: IIS ? You can stop www.   Not the SMTP, NNTP.  AND IIS must be installed.   William   -Ori

RE: Eseutil

oooh, that's a good explanation! That should go up there with Ed's on the FAQ. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! "According to the facts in the public record so far, this was not an act of war and NATO Article 5 does not apply. Preside

RE: owa ON A DIFFERENT SERVER.

Title: Message Well, first you put the CD in the CD-ROM drive...   Actually, maybe you better go to http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_tshoot.asp first.  -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!Pray that there

RE: Manual DB maintenance

Title: Message Why? They are just going to use it up again. You need to get more drives though. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:42 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Manual DB maintenance Exch

RE: IIS ?

You can stop www.   Not the SMTP, NNTP.  AND IIS must be installed.   William   -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS ? You can stop the services  and no features (except

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Sherry,   You aren't going to win this one.   If you were to NEVER run eseutil again, you would have just as much space used on your server. The 16GB limit has nothing to do with it.     The DEFRAG process DOES NOT RECOVER SPACE!   Defrag ONLY takes messages that are inters

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Your logic is still flawed.   >> regaining 2 GB worth of space is worthy of running eseutil on a monthly basis.   1) The space you think you are recovering is getting used up again anyway.  If the numbers you indicate are consistent, then your priv.edb would actually REMAIN t

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Get the VPN upgrade for the SonicWall, there... Your VPN solution. Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: exchlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:56 PM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: Outlook Connections through a firew

RE: owa ON A DIFFERENT SERVER.

Title: Message Simple Version:   Exchange5.5 CD   Start--Run--Setup   Install the OWA components.   William   -Original Message-From: Zamanian, Behzad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:34 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: owa ON A DIFFERENT SERVER.

Re: Eseutil

Title: Message Which is great for those folks who see these messages in their intended format, and who don't have any color blindness.   ;-)   - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:33 PM Subje

RE: owa ON A DIFFERENT SERVER.

Title: Message Yes, and this is the way to go for any but very small ex/owa combinations. We use 2 stand alone servers (not dc's) and use windows load balancing service on nt4 for load sharing which most of the time works quite well.   Just start the exch 5.5 install as normal, but when prom

FW: owa ON A DIFFERENT SERVER.

Title: Message http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q234/8/05.ASP?LN=EN-US&SD=gn&FR=0&qry=owa&rnk=100&src="">   Danny Cahoon Network Admin Saflink Corp -Original Message-From: Zamanian, Behzad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:34 PMTo: MS

RE: Eseutil

See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q185/4/57.ASP Pat > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > --_=_NextPart_001_01C16248.68025430 > Content-Type: text/plain; > cha

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Sorry.  Typo... my bad.   W     -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Eseutil Thanks, William.   Actually, for the past four years I *was* a Windows NT/2000 MVP

RE: Prevent sending attachments

I fail to see the point in doing this as the attachment will not execute in the OS with an odd extension. As soon as the recipient runs the attachment they will get an error message about the extension not having a valid application registered. I use Trend to do the trapping and write th attac

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message What, pray tell does the MVP moniker mean? Is it some sort of cert? is it shameless self promotion? ;)   -Mike -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:11 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re:

RE: Eseutil

what exactly makes up superfabric? Thanks Pat > See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q185/4/57.ASP > > Pat > > > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > > > --_=_Next

Manual DB maintenance

Title: Message Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP5 Dell PE6300. Only have 12 MB free disk space on DB partition. Deleted Item Retention set to 0 days. I know that Exchange runs db maint automagically, but can I fire it off manually? I just had users delete 500+ MB and want to reclaim disk space fas

RE: Strange problem

Title: Strange problem Can you see their MX record ok?   William   -Original Message-From: Blake R. Fowkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Strange problem I have been scratching my head on this one for a few da

Re: IIS ?

Title: Message thanks got it. M - Original Message - From: Woodrick, Ed To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:00 PM Subject: RE: IIS ? No, not unless you want your Exchange Server to operate.     Try it this way, insta

RE: Mailing Lists

Sorry if I was specific when I said a few thousand, but the numbers vary greatly from list to list. They can be as small as a couple hundred if it's only for one customer's site or as much as five thousand if it's a general newsletter. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:

RE: Eseutil

I explained it to a junior admin this way once (dont know if he understood, or just was confused more) eseutil reclaims whitespace, but since you are usually going to re-use it soon with new data, why bother...its kinda like filling up a cup with water, drinking most but not all of the water, an

RE: Outlook 2000 slow to open MAPI account with Exchange 2000

Ping to FQDN replies immediately? Anything else between the workstations and server? Are the clients of sufficient power? Is the server overburdened? William -Original Message- From: Garrett Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:13 PM To: MS-Exchan

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Listen to William & Martin, they know of what they speak. Opening up your firewall to RPC traffic is a horrible idea. VPN or Terminal Services is the way to go. > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --=_NextPart_000_02A1_01C16219.54499F20 > Content-Type: text/plain; > ch

Strange problem

Title: Strange problem I have been scratching my head on this one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know tha

RE: Eseutil

And the same Scott Schnoll from Event Log Monitor – www.tntsoftware.com ? Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member “Who's watching your network?” www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Why archive into the PSTs? Is file-server hd space cheaper than exchange server hd space? Unless you have the Standard edition, in which case I understand... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Freedom is hard. In the name of freedom, t

RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall

I have no issue with BSD just have never used one myself. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall Why Linux? BSD, dude.

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? If you really had no budget you would use the backup software that came free with your WindowsOS and does not perform Brick Level (or whatever the marketers are calling it these days) backups.   I use a P166 with 32MB RAM - my recovery

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Use the VPN that comes built into Win2K or WINNT Server if you have to, it's free (ur, you already paid for it). > Hello, > Thank you for the suggestions of a VPN. I am unable at this > time to purchase a VPN enabled solution. I am using a SonicWall SOHO2, > this server is probably one of

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? I totally agree with both your points, 1. Of course, not all Admins are on this list, and my objective was to take a dipstick from the "one great pool of talent" (no kidding) that IS here. 2. Abt vendors only adding things that people

RE: Eseutil

Yes...and much much better than mine!! Pat "Briggs, Bruce"

Strange problem

Title: Strange problem I have been scratching my head on this one for a few days now.  I am having a problem sending internet email.  But here's the real kicker, I am only having problems sending to one domain.  I have not made any changes to my server, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4 SP6a.  I know tha

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Excellent description. This one should be added to the FAQs.   -Original Message-From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil Sherry,   You aren't going to win this one.   If yo

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

In reality, probably not a lot. In our case, twice in about four years. But you can bet that the once will be the the time that a multi million pound deal is resting on that mail. The ideal situation: NO BLB's - daily backups - monthly archived backup tape - Client archive pst's on server that i

RE: IIS ?

Title: Message No, not unless you want your Exchange Server to operate.     Try it this way, install E2K without IIS.   E2K REQUIRES AD IIS SMTP NNTP -Original Message-From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:42 PMPosted To: Exch

Re: Exchange 5.5 OWA question

no ipaddress/exchange doesnt work either..i will take a look at the guide.   thanks, Bob C. - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:34 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA question Does

Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall Hello,     I am having some difficulty connecting to an exchange server using Outlook through a firewall.  I have OWA setup for my remote users but I have users elsewhere within our organization that I would like to allow direct (not IMAP) a

Re: OT Halloween tricks

Ouch that's a good one. Matt - Original Message - From: "Cicerrella, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:20 PM Subject: RE: OT Halloween tricks > funny you should mention... OH man, could you imagine th

RE: Mailing Lists

The same contacts that are in our distribution lists are also needed by the sale people out on the road. That's why we we're trying to do it through Public Folders so we could make them accessible through OWA. To make things worse we have an antiquated travel booking program that needs to be able

RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall

Cheers. W -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall OpenBSD is good, no disputing that. Linux is also good - but both depend on their administrator to

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message ::confused::    Sherry -- when you delete things via MBM, it leaves fragmented white space in the database.  The online defrag built into Exchange then compresses that database & clumps all the whitespace together.  The next time something is written to the database, it uses

RE: IIS ?

You can stop the services  and no features (except specific public folders issues) will impact the end user.       -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: IIS ?  

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Message That isn't a problem. It is a good thing.   You need a VPN -Original Message-From: exchlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:23 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Connections through a firewall Hello,    

RE: OT Halloween tricks

So here's the million $$ question. Did it set off the sprinklers? :-) --Andrew Duey, MCSE -Original Message- From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:59 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OT Halloween tricks Okay, this group just

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Ok...thanks.but...:) What exact files make up this limitation? priv + pub.edb and or dir.edb? Others? Those 3 only wiegh in at 3 GB on my system, but the mdbdata dir is over 9 GB, does he limitation count this as well? And is this normal? Thanks, Howie   Howie Pin

Re: OT Halloween tricks

That's a good one. We had a birthday party at the Census Bureau. The person who brought in the cake had put the candles that you can't blow out on it for the birthday girl. She put the cake right under a smoke detector...and you guessed it, it wasn't long until we were all evacuated while the fire

RE: NT 4 120 day eval situation

I 've used the products from Algintech on a few servers when I was doing consulting and they have really saved me some time and my clients some money. There products really work. -Original Message- From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:47

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall Nice KB article: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q176/4/66.ASP -Original Message-From: exchlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Conn

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

> Horses for Courses That's a strange expression, Bruce! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - "Catch your dreams bef

RE: OT Halloween tricks

Title: Message lol...  Why yes I do, bout 6 of them and they all wear yellow rain coats and drive a big red truck.       -Original Message-From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT Halloween

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

What firewall product are you using? Have you thought about a VPN? Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: exchlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Ad

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Not hypothetical.  That is what happens.   William     -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil So, let m

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message So the HD was what? 8GB? -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil I tried and ran out of disk space.  That was in 1998.   -Or

RE: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall You should deploy a VPN solution to minimise risk.   William   -Original Message-From: exchlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Outlook Connections through a firewall

Outlook connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook connections through a firewall Hello,     I am having some difficulty connecting to an exchange server using Outlook through a firewall.  I have OWA setup for my remote users but I have users elsewhere within our organization that I would like to allow direct (not IMAP) a

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? In case this got missed:   Do you think that all the exchange admins in the world are on this list?   And, in addition -- do you really think that vendors only add items that people ask for?  And that when they do add those items, they

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message why bother getting back the space? it will eventfully be used up by new massages any how? still to dangerous to be of any value even in your "delete large amounts of data" scenario.    Please try again.   Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From:

Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall Hello,     I am having some difficulty connecting to an exchange server using Outlook through a firewall.  I have OWA setup for my remote users but I have users elsewhere within our organization that I would like to allow direct (not IMAP) a

RE: IIS ?

Um... yes.   IIS is mandatory for Exchange2000.    William   -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: IIS ? No.   -Original Message-From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Outlook Connections through a firewall

Title: Outlook Connections through a firewall Hello,     I am having some difficulty connecting to an exchange server using Outlook through a firewall.  I have OWA setup for my remote users but I have users elsewhere within our organization that I would like to allow direct (not IMAP) a

RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall

OpenBSD is good, no disputing that. Linux is also good - but both depend on their administrator to be secure. A well adminned Linux box beats an adminless BSD machine. The same argument could be extended (and often is) that a well-adminned Windoes box can be an effective firewall. This is techni

RE: OT Halloween tricks

funny you should mention... OH man, could you imagine the damage done, 6 floors of pc's knocked out by the sprinkler system would equal unemployed. Nah, they are set off by heat, thank goodness. I am the only one catching the heat. And I didn't even turn it on.. the help desk guys closed

Re: IIS ?

That was kind of what I was thinking. thanks for the conformation. Matt - Original Message - From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: IIS ? Even if you only stop the World Wid

RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

What do you think ? -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Do you think that every exchange administrator in the world is on t

Re: Eseutil

Title: Message Thanks, William.   Actually, for the past four years I *was* a Windows NT/2000 MVP, but this year I am an Exchange MVP.   Oh, and its Schnoll, not Scholl.  :-)   Exchange 2000 Server: The Complete Reference - ISBN 0072127392     :-)       - Original Message - Fro

RE: IIS ?

Even if you only stop the World Wide Web Service you will loose the ability to administer public folders with the Exchange System Management Console and the Instant Messaging stuff will no longer work. If you deinstall IIS you will screw up your whole Exchange 2000 installation because this will

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message I tried and ran out of disk space.  That was in 1998.   -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil Lets test that that theory.     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? apparently not.  -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Men of peace usually are brave." Gene Roddenberry -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? In case this got missed :   So from what you all have told me, from an administration and maintenance perspective BLB sux. So why is every one of you is asking this question to all the vendors ? "Q> Do you have mailbox level recovery

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

I was not part of the decision-making process.  We are standardizing on Cisco equipment, so that probably played a part in the decision.  As to why we are moving from a managed BSD/Gauntlet firewall, I believe that our network manager wants to save money.   -Original Message-From: El

RE: Mailing Lists

Title: Message What about the SQL flavor of Lyris? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mailing Lists Yup. All our contact info is in a SQL database, an

RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA question

Try http://ipaddress\exchange\logon.asp Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this d

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Well, I'm not sure what sexual orientation has to do with object-level messaging restores, but ok -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:39 AMTo: MS-Ex

IIS ?

I'm new to exchange 2k.  Is there any reason I need to run IIS? Aside from the obvious OWA which they won't be running. thanks in advance, Matt List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message it was a different color  -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - They call it PMS because Mad Cow Dis

RE: OT Halloween tricks

Title: Message Crazy nut!  Pizza?  Whooboy, you got a designated driver? -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT Halloween tricks Okay, this group just love

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? of course -- isn't that what we all do?  -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk ---

RE: manual uninstall of exchange

Sorry, I'm a little late on this one. However, couldn't you just pop the Exchange 5.5 Server CD in, run setup.exe and select Remove at the setup screen? This is assuming that you have an Exchange 5.5 server CD available. I just did this the other day and it worked very well. Marshall -Or

Re: OT Halloween tricks

Steve, Does this mean we are or are not invited? Pizza sounds great!! Or has Halloween been canceled? Good thing it was a help desk guy who turned it on!! Are you sure you will be able to live this down, or is that what you will be asking Santa for? (assuming cool people ALSO believe in Santa)

Outlook 2000 slow to open MAPI account with Exchange 2000

I have a new install of W2K/E2K and am having problems with the clients (Outlook 2000) accessing the server. The first time that you create the profile, it connects to the server quickly, but if you close Outlook and go back into it, it takes a long time and periodically times out before it final

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? I would guess, if Michèle were to deploy Exchange in a law firm, email archiving policy would be so clearly documented and implemented that nobody would dare ask about a wayward email from the days of yore.   A total guess though.   Wil

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

These items are on our state purchasing contract, which does provide a price break.  We will get a brief training session, but I am not sure that "brief" will be comprehensive enough for newbies who have never touched routers or Cisco Pix firewalls.  However, it will have to serve, since the

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message if you didn't run the eseutil, tho, the new data would just re-write over the empty space that gets defragmented by the online process built into exchange.  -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"In the frank expression of c

Re: Eseutil

MessageIMHO, this statement is wrong: "The best maintance [sic] for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done." There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs. You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more frequently

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

>Another suggestion is to get your "Network Manager" to spring for a training class for one of your fellow co-workers.  Then >that person can come back and teach the rest of the staff.   Well, that was my suggestion, but he is a do it himself kind of guy and not much on showing what was do

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Same under SBS 4.5?   Thought I'd seen somewhere that it was 12?   h.?   Thanks   Howie -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil 1

RE: e-mail recovery

You can use standard Exch recovery options as outlined in the MS Exch DR whitepaper, then pull the data using Exmerge or OL. -Original Message- From: Gasparino, Michael (x2665) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

Thank you. I knew it allowed for 5 digits. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Thanks, turns out it is the same as 5.5, 24855 d

OT Halloween tricks

Okay, this group just loves off topic hoohahs so here is a good one. In the US we celebrate Halloween with a fervor, at least those of us that are cool do.    My company is having a Halloween party today, pizza, the whole nine yards.    So, being the good techie I brought in a fog machi

RE: Eseutil

Title: Message Lets test that that theory.     Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil 16GB for standard.

  1   2   3   4   >