Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread tarvid
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 22:08, Lorne wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 12:38 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: PLEASE PLEASE! DO NOT MAKE THE FIREWALL SERVE A BUNCH OF SERVICES! Try the converse on for size. Don't restrict access to services on a machine because you should really do that on a

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Michael Adams
There was talk about updates being available for this product for three years. But at present i only see a one year support cycle. http://www.mandrakesoft.com/products/corporate-server and http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg65843.html from which i quote quote From: Vincent Danen

[expert] why sendmail updates are 8.12.6 instead 8.12.8 for MDK 9.0 ?

2003-03-06 Thread maxxik
Hi i have a question : why sendmail updates for MDK 9.0 are sendmail-8.12.6 instead sendmail 8.12.8 ??? wbr, maxx Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] [OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!?

2003-03-06 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:58, stefmit wrote: Sorry for the OT, but I am feeling so frustrated now ... I meant to ask this question for a while (Google didn't turn any positive results), but it is now when I am in dire need of an answer: is there an equivalent multi-site search agent for Linux, as

Re: [expert] OK, what am I doing wrong when compiling a new kernel?!?

2003-03-06 Thread Adrian Golumbovici
Ummm... nope. :) I think that was it :) Best regards, Adrian - Original Message - From: Ray Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:06 AM Subject: Re: [expert] OK, what am I doing wrong when compiling a new kernel?!? On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Michael Adams
Whups, i should finish reading the posts before replying. Sorry Vincent. On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:26, Vincent Danen wrote: On Tue Mar 04, 2003 at 10:52:18PM -0500, Jim Hubbard wrote: I think that now is a really good time for Mandrake to reconsider their snip will happen I think in about a

[expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Colin Jenkins
finally had to remove mdk9 and replace it with w2k today :( I have tried to get a backup happening for months now with little success. The script below works fine when run directly but when run as a cron task, it backs up some of the first directory (about 2 gb), then quits. no errors in the

Re: [expert] ML9.0 installation fails on step 'Hard drive detection'(WDC WD800AB-00CBA1)

2003-03-06 Thread Andreas Weiss
J. Grant wrote: Is it SCSI then? I thogught it was IDE Yes it is IDE. Works ok, as long as I set it as udma2 in the bios, have you done this? have you checked its got the right jumper settings? I couldn't find this option in BIOS and about jumpers I have no idea. But, now I've downloaded ML9.1

Re: [expert] did anyone succeed in compiling the 2.5.64 kernel?

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 17:35, Adrian Golumbovici wrote: thx. but btw, what is with the su -c? I normally log in as root anyway when want to compile and install a kernel. What does the su -c actually do when used in a command? I used su before, but to change user and not inside a command? Maybe

Re: [expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Mullen
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 04:54, Colin Jenkins wrote: finally had to remove mdk9 and replace it with w2k today :( I have tried to get a backup happening for months now with little success. The script below works fine when run directly but when run as a cron task, it backs up some of the first

Re: [expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 06 Mar 2003 11:50 am, Bill Mullen wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 04:54, Colin Jenkins wrote: finally had to remove mdk9 and replace it with w2k today :( I have tried to get a backup happening for months now with little success. The script below works fine when run directly but

Re: [expert] ALSA + vt8233 = noisy in background

2003-03-06 Thread Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
Thank you James. I was afraid to hear that and anxious as I am I got a SB live that works fantastically, even with ALSA. BTW, I miss my SB AWE32 and its midi capabilities, but it was ISA, so... Cheers, On 5 Mar 2003, James Sparenberg wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Alan Wilter Sousa da

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bindsocket

2003-03-06 Thread Pierre Fortin
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket - Cannot assign requested address. So, something is stopping it from getting the address it wants. I also noticed that named wasn't happy either: see

Replying [was Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?]

2003-03-06 Thread Pierre Fortin
On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 23:13:33 -0800 Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, Can you stop using reply to all? We use a list to keep the discussions out of our regular mail... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: lsof -i :port# Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried: lsof -i :28000 lsof -i :port28000 lsof -i :port#28000 lsof -i :port 28000 lsof -i :port# 28000 So...which one is correct? I got various different

Re: [expert] ML9.0 installation fails on step 'Hard drive detection' (WDC WD800AB-00CBA1)

2003-03-06 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wednesday March 5 2003 04:49 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: Andreas Weiss wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:07:12PM +0100 : I can install Suse Linux, but only with the kernel parameters: ide=nodma apm=off acpi=off With ML these parameters didn't help. noapic didn't help either. Try ide0=nodma

[expert] Re:[OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!? ... now we're talking search fundamentals!

2003-03-06 Thread stefmit
Thank you - didn't know about this one. I will investigate those engines, in the hope for a Linux capable one. But talking about (re)search of Internet, and because you mentioned/quoted the paragraph below, then allow me to advise you to visit one very interesting site related to this

Re: [expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Jim C
Some things you might consider trying: 1. Sounds like an awful lot of data. Might consider compression with tar -cvzf [filename] [directory]. Omit the file extension if you do this. tar -cvf /mnt/windows/user2003.tar \ --directory /mnt/temp/2003 --exclude=User.dat --exclude=History

Re: Replying [was Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?]

2003-03-06 Thread Jim C
Apparently some do and some don't. I get such responses from this list occasionally and if someone replies, getting something in my inbox rather than having it sorted into one of my many list directories can be helpful in finding it. I'm sorry you do not find it so. To my knowledge, this is

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bind socket

2003-03-06 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:56 am, David Whiting wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:27:43PM +, Anne Wilson wrote: It looks okay to me (i.e. no garbage characters, but it could be misconfigured without me having a clue) NETWORKING=yes FORWARD_IPV4=false

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Norman
Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Norman wrote on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:32:48PM + : Hi all, I have been asked if I can set up a Linux box to replace an NT server. What has been requested is that it be file server, mail server, print server and firewall and

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bind socket

2003-03-06 Thread David Whiting
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket - Cannot assign requested address. So, something is stopping it from getting the

Re: [expert] Re:[OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!? ... now we're talking search fundamentals!

2003-03-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 06 Mar 2003 12:37 pm, stefmit wrote: Thank you - didn't know about this one. I will investigate those engines, in the hope for a Linux capable one. But talking about (re)search of Internet, and because you mentioned/quoted the paragraph below, then allow me to advise you to visit

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Jim C
Did you try : which lsof You might not have the executeable. Ronald J. Hall wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: lsof -i :port# Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried: lsof -i :28000 lsof -i :port28000 lsof -i :port#28000 lsof -i

[expert] postfix configuration ?

2003-03-06 Thread Carter Harris
I installed postfix during the installation of my 8.2 mandrake os. The postfix version is 20020228, I think. I am trying to setup postfix using the Postfix+Courier-IMAP+MySQL documentation but I'm getting the following error message: Mar 6 08:56:55 linuxserver postfix/qmgr[15746]: fatal:

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Jack Coates
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 00:10, tarvid wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 22:08, Lorne wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 12:38 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: PLEASE PLEASE! DO NOT MAKE THE FIREWALL SERVE A BUNCH OF SERVICES! Try the converse on for size. ... I started to reply to Todd's message

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Pierre Fortin
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:09:44 -0500 Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 09:33 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: lsof -i :port# Hmm, I just tried that and I must be doing something wrong. I tried: lsof -i :28000 lsof -i :port28000 lsof -i :port#28000 lsof -i

[expert] Limiting Process List for users

2003-03-06 Thread thorsten Sideb0ard
Does anyone know how to enable one user to see another's process table? When i installed the box in question, i had originally chosen msec level4, which is now down to 3, however i do recall it asking a question about limiting process space. Basically i have a cron job which logs into the box,

[expert] Midi with SBlive

2003-03-06 Thread Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
Hi List! I checked in google and got some documents about midi(/dev/sequencer) working with SBLive, but somes old and others a little bit generic. I wonder if among Mandrake users somone has SBLive Midi (using ALSA) configured and working, I mean, one can use 'playmidi test.mid' or kmid and

[expert] Creative PC-CAM 750 USB

2003-03-06 Thread Oscar
Hi all Please, How can I use a Creative PC-CAM 750 USB webcam under Linux? I can't find anything in Google. I am using LM 8.2, but I will upgrade to 9.1 when it will be out ;) Thank you in advance Best regards, -- Óscar Santacreu Usuario de Linux Registrado #227443 http://counter.li.org/ Want

Re: [expert] Re:[OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!? ... now we'retalking search fundamentals!

2003-03-06 Thread Larry Sword
stefmit wrote: Thank you - didn't know about this one. I will investigate those engines, in the hope for a Linux capable one. But talking about (re)search of Internet, and because you mentioned/quoted the paragraph below, then allow me to advise you to visit one very interesting site related

Re: [expert] Midi with SBlive

2003-03-06 Thread Oscar
El Jue 06 Mar 2003 17:42, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva escribió sabiamente: Hi List! I checked in google and got some documents about midi(/dev/sequencer) working with SBLive, but somes old and others a little bit generic. I wonder if among Mandrake users somone has SBLive Midi (using ALSA)

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Vox
This time Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes daring and writes: IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business running a server of any kind, no matter what Microsoft may have told you. Gee, thanks for the flame. :-/ It's not a flame, it's a statement of *my

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tarvid wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:10:08AM -0500 : PLEASE PLEASE! DO NOT MAKE THE FIREWALL SERVE A BUNCH OF SERVICES! Try the converse on for size. You're making it sound as if I said either/or. I didn't spell it out properly then. Do

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 10:40:42PM +1300, Michael Adams wrote: There was talk about updates being available for this product for three years. But at present i only see a one year support cycle. Support as in phone support... this does not refer to updates support. The EOL for each product is

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 10:57:45PM +1300, Michael Adams wrote: Whups, i should finish reading the posts before replying. Sorry Vincent. Apparently I suffer from the same symptoms. =) See my reply to your reply. On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:26, Vincent Danen wrote: On Tue Mar 04, 2003 at

[expert] net_monitor

2003-03-06 Thread Brian
I just had some strange behavior on my system. I noticed that net_monitor was not working. I went into /usr/sbin and sure enough net_monitor was now a link to a file called /usr/bin/consolehelper and there was a working version of net_monitor called net_monitor.real. I renamed net_monitor to

Re: [expert] why sendmail updates are 8.12.6 instead 8.12.8 for MDK 9.0 ?

2003-03-06 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 11:44:37AM +0200, maxxik wrote: First.. fix your reply-to. i have a question : why sendmail updates for MDK 9.0 are sendmail-8.12.6 instead sendmail 8.12.8 ??? Because we patched 8.12.6. And when we were preparing the updates, we were given patches, not the new

Re: [expert] net_monitor

2003-03-06 Thread et
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:42 pm, Brian wrote: I just had some strange behavior on my system. I noticed that net_monitor was not working. I went into /usr/sbin and sure enough net_monitor was now a link to a file called /usr/bin/consolehelper and there was a working version of net_monitor

Re: [expert] net_monitor

2003-03-06 Thread Brian
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:51 pm, et wrote: On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:42 pm, Brian wrote: I just had some strange behavior on my system. I noticed that net_monitor was not working. I went into /usr/sbin and sure enough net_monitor was now a link to a file called

Re: [expert] Limiting Process List for users

2003-03-06 Thread Tibor Pittich
On 06. mar 2003, 16:35, thorsten Sideb0ard wrote: Does anyone know how to enable one user to see another's process table? Basically i have a cron job which logs into the box, checks 'ps auwx' output, and always flags an error because it can't see the process it is looking for. I have added

[expert] rpm appears screwed...how to fix?

2003-03-06 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mandrake 9.0. I was just trying to run a search for lesstif (rpm -qa|grep lesstif) and found myself waiting forever for an answer. I then just downloaded the lesstif rpm and tried to install it. Nothing. It does the preparing thing but just

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread tarvid
On Thursday 06 March 2003 14:35, Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tarvid wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:10:08AM -0500 : PLEASE PLEASE! DO NOT MAKE THE FIREWALL SERVE A BUNCH OF SERVICES! Try the converse on for size. You're making it sound as if I

Re: [expert] rpm appears screwed...how to fix?

2003-03-06 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 15:42, Praedor Atrebates wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mandrake 9.0. I was just trying to run a search for lesstif (rpm -qa|grep lesstif) and found myself waiting forever for an answer. I then just downloaded the lesstif rpm and tried to

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim C wrote on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:37:35PM -0800 : shrug Well perhaps you are correct but if you are and it is simple, then why am I not seeing netbios ports 137 and 138? If they weren't working I wouldn't be writing this because my

Re: [expert] Re:[OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!? ... now we're talking search fundamentals!

2003-03-06 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anne Wilson wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:26:08PM + : Side issue - when I first used the Internet you could ask a search engine for term_a AND (term_b OR term_c) Not term_d These days I can't find any way of excluding the thousands of refs

[expert] samb file permission

2003-03-06 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi, Everytime users want to create a folder in the share, they get a prompt saying They may not be able to access the folder. If they go ahead, they can still creat sub-folders, but cannot copy files to the folder. Would someone please give me some help? My config is as follows, [proj] comment

Re: [expert] Re:[OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!? ... now we're talking search fundamentals!

2003-03-06 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 06 Mar 2003 9:39 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anne Wilson wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:26:08PM + : Side issue - when I first used the Internet you could ask a search engine for term_a AND (term_b OR term_c) Not term_d These days I

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 06 March 2003 10:12 am, Jim C wrote: Did you try : which lsof You might not have the executeable. Thanks for the reply. Yep, I do have it. I just wasn't using it on a port that had anything. Port 28000 has nothing on it, so no report. Thats all. :-) --

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Thursday 06 March 2003 10:58 am, Pierre Fortin wrote: Try a valid port (lsof -i :80) and note that you may not see :80 but :http... this is not grep... HTH Got it. I was using port 28000 'cause it popped into my head (Tribes 2 uses it!). When I used a valid port, it worked fine. (for

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread J. Craig Woods
Todd Lyons wrote: The other guy has my intent correct: I'm not saying my way is the only way. I would be Todd Gates if that was the case. Instead, I'm saying I recommend this way because you should _think_ about putting a system together, no just throw it all together helter skelter. (insert

Re: [expert] [OT] Copernic equivalent for Linux?!?

2003-03-06 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 05:58 pm, stefmit wrote: Sorry for the OT, but I am feeling so frustrated now ... I meant to ask this question for a while (Google didn't turn any positive results), but it is now when I am in dire need of an answer: is there an equivalent multi-site search agent for

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Ric Tibbetts
Vincent Danen wrote: On Wed Mar 05, 2003 at 12:29:42PM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote: I think part of Redhats motivation was the far too numerious requests for requests like: When will redhat make rpms for kde3.1 for Redhat 7.3? And such. Truth is, they won't. But people don't seem to get

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Mullen
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote: I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's start giving out practical tests to everybody before allowing them to use a computer unsupervised...that'd be paradise :) There

Re: [expert] samb file permission

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Mullen
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 16:52, Norman Zhang wrote: Everytime users want to create a folder in the share, they get a prompt saying They may not be able to access the folder. If they go ahead, they can still creat sub-folders, but cannot copy files to the folder. Would someone please give me some

Re: [expert] rpm appears screwed...how to fix?

2003-03-06 Thread A V Flinsch
On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:42 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: Mandrake 9.0. I was just trying to run a search for lesstif (rpm -qa|grep lesstif) and found myself waiting forever for an answer. I then just downloaded the lesstif rpm and tried to install it. Nothing. It does the preparing

Re: [expert] samb file permission

2003-03-06 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi, Sorry. My mistake. Users were trying to move files that they don't have permission into the folders. Copying files or creating files does work. But they still get the prompt saying You might not be able to access the files you created. Do you want to continue? Is there a fix for this? I added

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Vox
This time Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes daring and writes: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote: I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's start giving out practical tests to everybody before allowing

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 20:52, Bill Mullen wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:45, Vox wrote: I don't advocate for a MSCE-like test for computer users...theoretical tests don't mean a thing, IMNSHO...but let's start giving out practical tests to everybody before allowing them to use a

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Bill Mullen
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 14:26, Vincent Danen wrote: Corporate Server 2.1 was just announced, and it has a 3 year life policy. It's also cheaper than RHAS I believe. There is your choice. Supporting 9.1 for 3 years isn't an option. Mandrake Linux 9.1 is a desktop OS and while it works quite

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Dave Seff
On this topic, does anybody know of any project that aims to be a drop-in replacement for exchange? I run an all Linux IT shop EXCEXT for Exchange because our sales people are literally attached to the hip with Blackberries. If there is a project out there that looks to do exchange to the letter

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Jack Coates
See the latest Linux Journal. Also look for Bynari. I'd prepare for a big big challenge though, none of it looks prime time yet. On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:13, Dave Seff wrote: On this topic, does anybody know of any project that aims to be a drop-in replacement for exchange? I run an all Linux

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bind socket

2003-03-06 Thread David Whiting
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cups]# service named status rndc: connection to remote host closed This may indicate that the remote server is using an older version of the command protocol, this host is not authorized to connect, or the

[expert] Any CVS wizards out there?

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
All, Ok having a problem with CVS permissions on our CVS server. Seems that when people check stuff in it's setting the ownership as that user... Then no one else can check it out. I've put each user into the group cvs and cvs into each user group. But still this occurs. They are using

Re: [expert] Mandrake's Golden Opportunity

2003-03-06 Thread Vincent Danen
On Thu Mar 06, 2003 at 09:39:07PM -0500, Bill Mullen wrote: Corporate Server 2.1 was just announced, and it has a 3 year life policy. It's also cheaper than RHAS I believe. There is your choice. Supporting 9.1 for 3 years isn't an option. Mandrake Linux 9.1 is a desktop OS and while it

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 09:45, Vox wrote: This time Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes daring and writes: IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business running a server of any kind, no matter what Microsoft may have told you. Gee, thanks for the flame. :-/

Re: [expert] Any CVS wizards out there?

2003-03-06 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:50, James Sparenberg wrote: All, Ok having a problem with CVS permissions on our CVS server. Seems that when people check stuff in it's setting the ownership as that user... Then no one else can check it out. I've put each user into the group cvs and cvs into

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bindsocket

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 10:03, David Whiting wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:51:52AM -0500, Pierre Fortin wrote: On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:35:19 + David Whiting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [06/Mar/2003:07:17:05 +] StartListening: Unable to bind socket - Cannot assign requested

Re: [expert] net_monitor

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 12:12, Brian wrote: On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:51 pm, et wrote: On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:42 pm, Brian wrote: I just had some strange behavior on my system. I noticed that net_monitor was not working. I went into /usr/sbin and sure enough net_monitor was

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Vox
This time James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes daring and writes: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 09:45, Vox wrote: This time Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes daring and writes: IMNSHO, if you don't understand IP,TCP, UDP, you have no business running a server of any kind, no matter

Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 14:26, J. Craig Woods wrote: Todd Lyons wrote: The other guy has my intent correct: I'm not saying my way is the only way. I would be Todd Gates if that was the case. Instead, I'm saying I recommend this way because you should _think_ about putting a system

Re: [expert] Any CVS wizards out there?

2003-03-06 Thread James Sparenberg
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 21:25, Kwan Lowe wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:50, James Sparenberg wrote: All, Ok having a problem with CVS permissions on our CVS server. Seems that when people check stuff in it's setting the ownership as that user... Then no one else can check it out.

Re: [expert] How to check for open ports?

2003-03-06 Thread Dave Laird
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 G'evenin' all... On Thursday 06 March 2003 09:42 pm, Vox wrote: James Sparenberg wrote: Of course the obvious question would be who do you want to exclude and how do you want the results of the test skewed... I can write a test to exclude any

Re: [expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Colin Jenkins
I notice that you're not using compression. I seem to recall having seen a thread on the local LUG list about tar silently croaking in exactly this fashion when the output file reaches 2GB in size; I'll have a look at the archives and see if I can track down more detailed info for you, as there

Re: [expert] cron tar

2003-03-06 Thread Colin Jenkins
At 07:06 AM 6/03/2003 -0800, you wrote: 1. Sounds like an awful lot of data. Might consider compression with tar -cvzf [filename] [directory]. Omit the file extension if you do this. have plenty of drive space, and without compression, it's a lot easier to restore individual files. 2.

RE: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients

2003-03-06 Thread Eko Budiharto
What is the file name for the firewall? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Norman Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Linux Mail Servers for Win clients Todd Lyons wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [expert] 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bind socket

2003-03-06 Thread David Whiting
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:17:02AM -0500, Carroll Grigsby wrote: Dave: Check your mail settings -- you have two To entries: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], hence the double postings. -- cmg Oh, sorry! I only see one so didn't know this was happening...still learning. I'll

Re: [expert] Fixed it - thanks folks. Was: 8.2 - 9.0, msec ran and now cups unable to bind socket

2003-03-06 Thread David Whiting
Solved it. I'm afraid I am still not sure what was really wrong, but in the end I decided to use rpm to remove cups and then urpmi to reinstall and cupsd runs and binds and cups works again. Thanks to all for your help. Dave On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:57:45PM +, David Whiting wrote:

Re: [expert] OT - Not ready while 123 runs

2003-03-06 Thread Ric Tibbetts
And just what does any of this have to do with MDK? I don't particularly care what will, or will not install on XP. This isn't the place for it. Ric On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:53:05PM -0400, Adolfo Bello wrote: Today, I tried to install Netscape 7 in a XP-SP1 box. After answering the