[expert] Bug Reporting Micro Mini How to

2003-10-08 Thread James Sparenberg
All, I've added to the Twiki in the form of a mini how to on proper bug report submission. Feel free to adjust. http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/BugReporting Eric. Thanks for the info it's in the tree now and all seems well in that respect. James Want to buy your Pack or Servi

Re: [expert] Bug in php-rrdtool-1.0.40-2mdk in rrd_fetch function

2003-10-04 Thread Joerg Mertin
*lol* It's You folks from mandrake of course. A Year back - I had patched a RedHat RPM to include the fix. But - since about 5 months - I do use Mdk-9.1 for my little Home-Server ;o) BTW - the stats I need the patch for can be viewed here: http://www.solsys.org/system.php?action=ext_Det The syst

[expert] Bug in php-rrdtool-1.0.40-2mdk in rrd_fetch function

2003-10-04 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hi Folks, by trying to improve my system stats etc. I found out that the rrd_tool module for php4 still had the old Bug I sent a patch to Tobias Oetiker by that time. Actually - the rrd_fetch function returns the data for one Datasource only, instead of cycling through all existing datasources

Re: [expert] bug #82 in Samba 2.2.8 RPMS?

2003-07-31 Thread James Sparenberg
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 17:48, Jim C wrote: > Anbody know how I can find out if I've got the patch for this? > Since it's a new one. do rpm -q --changelog samba-common | more then the same for samba-client and samba-server. If it's in there (and I've not the slightest idea which one will have

[expert] bug #82 in Samba 2.2.8 RPMS?

2003-07-30 Thread Jim C
Anbody know how I can find out if I've got the patch for this? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] Bug Report: phpgroupware-0.9.14.006-0.1mdk.noarch.rpm not signed

2003-07-23 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed Jul 23, 2003 at 07:04:14PM -0500, AAW wrote: > The recent update package for LM 9.1 (MDKSA-2003:077) is not signed (md5 > only). New packages are signed and are being mirrored. The new md5sums are in the advisory on the MandrakeSecure website. -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandr

[expert] Bug Report: phpgroupware-0.9.14.006-0.1mdk.noarch.rpm not signed

2003-07-23 Thread AAW
The recent update package for LM 9.1 (MDKSA-2003:077) is not signed (md5 only). Arn Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [expert] Bug about Gigabyte motherboard?

2003-07-15 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 03:14 pm, Francisco Alcaraz wrote: > Hello, > > A friend of mine had lot of problems to have well recognized a ethernet > card conected to a cable modem under Mandrake 9.1. In fact it had not > network runing :-). We thought that the problem was related with the > ethernet c

Re: [expert] Bug about Gigabyte motherboard?

2003-07-15 Thread Francisco Alcaraz
Well, The main problem with the Gigabyte motherboard was the network; now hi is very happy because everthing seem to be runing fine. Regards El Martes 15 Julio 2003 22:03, Anne Wilson escribió: > On Tuesday 15 Jul 2003 8:14 pm, Francisco Alcaraz wrote: > > Now he has a Intel motherboard with Se

Re: [expert] Bug about Gigabyte motherboard?

2003-07-15 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 15 Jul 2003 8:14 pm, Francisco Alcaraz wrote: > > Now he has a Intel motherboard with Serial ata.2. > Has he noticed any difference? Anne Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

[expert] Bug about Gigabyte motherboard?

2003-07-15 Thread Francisco Alcaraz
Hello, A friend of mine had lot of problems to have well recognized a ethernet card conected to a cable modem under Mandrake 9.1. In fact it had not network runing :-). We thought that the problem was related with the ethernet card, and then we tried with others, but that didn't solve it. Rece

[expert] bug in split ?

2003-06-24 Thread David Kuestler
Having trouble piping binary into the split command under Mandrake 9.1 with all the latest updates. Works fine under RedHat 9 Can someone else confirm a problem ? #!/bin/sh # fails after one block dd bs=1024 count=1024 if=/dev/urandom | split -b 100 - zz0 # fails after variable number of

Re: [expert] Bug in Bash ?

2002-12-12 Thread kwan
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Bill Shirley wrote: > I'm trying to make an bash alias do what I want an things are not > working as > expected. > > [root@server1 samba]# alias ta='echo /var/log/samba/log.${1:-smbd}' > [root@server1 samba]# ta > /var/log/samba/log.smbd > [root@server1 samba]# ta server2 > /

Re: [expert] Bug in Bash ?

2002-12-12 Thread Jack Coates
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 06:26, Bill Shirley wrote: > I'm trying to make an bash alias do what I want an things are not > working as > expected. > > [root@server1 samba]# alias ta='echo /var/log/samba/log.${1:-smbd}' > [root@server1 samba]# ta > /var/log/samba/log.smbd > [root@server1 samba]# ta serv

[expert] Bug in Bash ?

2002-12-12 Thread Bill Shirley
I'm trying to make an bash alias do what I want an things are not working as expected. [root@server1 samba]# alias ta='echo /var/log/samba/log.${1:-smbd}' [root@server1 samba]# ta /var/log/samba/log.smbd [root@server1 samba]# ta server2 /var/log/samba/log.smbd server2 I would think the second inv

[expert] BUG: Kpaint is broken (think memory-leak)

2002-12-02 Thread Steffen Barszus
Hi! Did anyone expierienced that problem too ? If I start kpaint the whole kde getting fast slower till nearly unusable. If I xkill kpaint, there is a crash of kpaint after 20 s and when the slowness disappear. First discovered that on pasting an image in it. Seems to be an open bug on kde. Gr

Re: [expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-30 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 11:02, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:53, Steffen Barszus wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:00, Lieven Van Acker wrote: > > > I did about 6 different installations, and I can confirm this bug in > > > drakxconf on every single one of the installat

Re: [expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-29 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:53, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:00, Lieven Van Acker wrote: > > I did about 6 different installations, and I can confirm this bug in > > drakxconf on every single one of the installations I performed. > > thanks. I had not seen this on my own

Re: [expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-29 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 14:00, Lieven Van Acker wrote: > I did about 6 different installations, and I can confirm this bug in > drakxconf on every single one of the installations I performed. > thanks. I had not seen this on my own install since I did not use it at all. But after seeing it at

Re: [expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-29 Thread Lieven Van Acker
I did about 6 different installations, and I can confirm this bug in drakxconf on every single one of the installations I performed. Moreover, drakconf simply doesn't work: Gtk-WARNING **: invalid cast from (NULL) pointer to 'GtkObject' at /usr/sbin/drakconf line 857. Can't call method "set_acti

Re: [expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-29 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 13:16, Steffen Barszus wrote: > Hi ! > > I installed Mandrake 9.0 on a computer of our Linux User Group. I have > several issues there, but will post them one by one. > > Since there are some newbies there I tried to show them drakxconf. I was > really upset on that tool:

[expert] BUG: drakxconf in Mdk 9.0

2002-10-29 Thread Steffen Barszus
Hi ! I installed Mandrake 9.0 on a computer of our Linux User Group. I have several issues there, but will post them one by one. Since there are some newbies there I tried to show them drakxconf. I was really upset on that tool: calling drakxconf on commandline I got the following menu: - Add

[expert] BUG: service lircd assume modules in wrong places

2002-10-25 Thread Steffen Barszus
HI! I wondered why lircd was not starting on my machine, so I read trough the scripts and saw the following : /etc/rc.d/init.d/lircd: [ -f /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc/$HWMOD.o ] \ && insmod $HWMOD $DRIVER_OPTS > /dev/null #locate lirc_ /lib/modules/2.4.19-16mdk/kernel/3rdparty/lirc/lirc_para

Re: [expert] Bug in g++ optimizer

2002-09-21 Thread dfox
> The program that show the bug is this (printf added by me, confirue > just relies on returned value): Hmm. What does the generated code do? (g++ -S) I might take a look, althouigh I'm not an expert at reading assembly. Still a minor point -- you are comparing floats for exactness. Does the bu

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-07-02 Thread James
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:41:36 -0700 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > James wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 08:32:44PM + : > > > > I've now got another box doing the same thing but not as often. It > > too has an intel all in one Mobo. What kind I'm not sure as thi

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-07-01 Thread Todd Lyons
James wrote on Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 08:32:44PM + : > > I've now got another box doing the same thing but not as often. It too > has an intel all in one Mobo. What kind I'm not sure as this box is an service apmd stop chkconfig apmd off Install another fan (ie keep the CPU/HD cooler than t

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-07-01 Thread James
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:50:43 -0700 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > James wrote on Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:55:34PM + : > > > > before it starts loosing stability. Lose of stability comes in the > > form of programs won't start or die suddenly etc. Then when thi

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-07-01 Thread Todd Lyons
James wrote on Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:55:34PM + : > > before it starts loosing stability. Lose of stability comes in the form > of programs won't start or die suddenly etc. Then when this starts to > happen I know to reboot the box and I'm back to normal. Top shows no > runaway programs

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-07-01 Thread Randy Kramer
James wrote: > Sorry it took so long to get back. I'm approaching stable.. I > removed devfsd. However all it's really done is lengthen the time > between reboots. The box can sit on but unused for about 10 hours or so > before it starts loosing stability. Lose of stability comes in the for

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-30 Thread James
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:43:00 -0700 James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:38:41 -0700 > Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > > > James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 06:04:16PM -0700 : > > > Oh the wording is mine... it goes to r

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread James
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:29:42 -0400 daRcmaTTeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Todd Lyons wrote: > | James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0700 : > | > |> Where I don't dispute the intent I'm having fits with the

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread James
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 18:38:41 -0700 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 06:04:16PM -0700 : > > Oh the wording is mine... it goes to runlevel 5 supposedly. But X > > etc cannot start. NO error messages just a hang. Leaving the >

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Todd Lyons
James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 06:04:16PM -0700 : > Oh the wording is mine... it goes to runlevel 5 supposedly. But X etc > cannot start. NO error messages just a hang. Leaving the box alone > for an hour results in a box that cannot be ssh'd into and is totally > frozen. No error mes

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread daRcmaTTeR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Lyons wrote: | James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0700 : | |> Where I don't dispute the intent I'm having fits with the results. |>Oh and for my camera and my usb printer. They haven't changed |>functionality since I got rid of de

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread James
Oh the wording is mine... it goes to runlevel 5 supposedly. But X etc cannot start. NO error messages just a hang. Leaving the box alone for an hour results in a box that cannot be ssh'd into and is totally frozen. No error messages. No log records it seems that X and Linux think they are

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Todd Lyons
James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 04:32:14PM -0700 : > > Yep first thing I did.. telinit 3 . cannot return to runlevel 5 > telinit 1 cannot return to run level 5 .. reboot. What do you mean "cannot return to runlevel 5"? That's an error message I've never seen before. Same thing hap

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread James
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:59:46 -0700 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0700 : > >Where I don't dispute the intent I'm having fits with the > >results. Oh and for my camera and my usb printer. They haven't > >c

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread James
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 11:40:20 -0700 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said with temporary authority > daRcmaTTeR wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 02:32:04PM -0400 : > > > > It's been my personal experience in the past 6 months that devfs is > > totally and completely the spawn of satan. I don't forsee

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Todd Lyons
Praedor Tempus wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 04:33:49PM -0500 : > Since installing 8.2, however, I have to manually remove the system's > insistent retardation of setting /dev/modem -> /dev/ttyS0 ->/dev/tts/0. This > does not exist on my system yet devfs does it every time. rm -f /lib/dev-s

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Todd Lyons
James wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0700 : >Where I don't dispute the intent I'm having fits with the results. > Oh and for my camera and my usb printer. They haven't changed > functionality since I got rid of devfs. Maybe because devfs set them up > at first. I'm just getting

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Praedor Tempus
On Sunday 23 June 2002 04:26 pm, daRcmaTTeR wrote: > jerry wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:32:04 -0400 > > > > daRcmaTTeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>"IT" should be forever scuttled and banned from the landscape of so > >>wonderful an OS never to be seen or heard from againEVER! > > > > (

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread daRcmaTTeR
jerry wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:32:04 -0400 > daRcmaTTeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>"IT" should be forever scuttled and banned from the landscape of so >>wonderful an OS never to be seen or heard from againEVER! > > > (as a result: there's no way they're taking it out now, es

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread jerry
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 14:32:04 -0400 daRcmaTTeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "IT" should be forever scuttled and banned from the landscape of so > wonderful an OS never to be seen or heard from againEVER! (as a result: there's no way they're taking it out now, especially if they read messag

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread Todd Lyons
daRcmaTTeR wrote on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 02:32:04PM -0400 : > > It's been my personal experience in the past 6 months that devfs is > totally and completely the spawn of satan. I don't forsee any true Satan might like you, but I'm his favorite. -- a coworker > usefullness coming from this pa

Re: [expert] Bug.... maybe maybe not.

2002-06-23 Thread daRcmaTTeR
James wrote: > All, > >Got an interesting problem here. It concerns everyones favorite > subject devfs ... I've done 12 installs so far with 8.2, on 10 of the > boxes /dev/video1-4 where created without a problem on two of the > boxes not there at all. So just for fun on one I rein

Re: [expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Mon, 06 May 2002 12:19:35 -0500 David Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, that's a possibility. I thought about rpm -e packages > and then rpm -Uvh packages from the LM7.2 distro. I just was > really interested in understanding the problem in 4.2 and seeeing if it could be > fixed befo

Re: [expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread Larry Sword
Since you have read just about everything you may have read and tried these, I'll reference just in case. http://www.xfree.org/4.2.0/I128.html http://www.xfree.org/4.2.0/i128.4.html I suppose you have checked you xf86config file for any miss configured lines? Larry David Rankin wrote:

Re: [expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread David Rankin
Well, that's a possibility. I thought about rpm -e packages and then rpm -Uvh packages from the LM7.2 distro. I just was really interested in understanding the problem in 4.2 and seeeing if it could be fixed before I went back to 4.01. Carroll Grigsby wrote: > On Monday 06 May 2002 10:21 am, y

Re: [expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Monday 06 May 2002 10:21 am, you wrote: > Guys and Gals: > > I think I can safely call it a bug now. After an exhaustive search > or xfree.org, Mandrake expert & newbie, and querrying the Mandrake chat > rooms, there are no answers why X4.2 and X3.3.6 that ship with LM 8.2 > will NOT work w

[expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video (Follow Up)

2002-05-06 Thread David Rankin
See my original post for details of problem: It seems that under X4.2, during startup, "ScreenInit start" is never executed after preInit and before the Mapping memory statement. It's completely missing in my log. After mapping memory, the server dies with the Addscreen/Screeninit error. Makes sen

Re: [expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread Alastair Scott
On Monday 06 May 2002 3:21 pm, David Rankin wrote: > DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS OTHER THAN "BUY A NEW VIDEO CARD" > > I guess the real question is "what changed in the I128 sever between > 4.01 and 4.2?" 4.01 is still working fine in LM7.2 on the same > machine. X4.2 or X3.3.6 will not star

[expert] BUG - X4.2 or X3.3.6 and I128 Video

2002-05-06 Thread David Rankin
Guys and Gals: I think I can safely call it a bug now. After an exhaustive search or xfree.org, Mandrake expert & newbie, and querrying the Mandrake chat rooms, there are no answers why X4.2 and X3.3.6 that ship with LM 8.2 will NOT work with my #9 Imagine 128 video card. Others have had simi

[expert] Bug ?!

2002-04-11 Thread Florian
Hi i installed a while ago Mandrake 8.2 on a gericom laptop for a friend of mine the problem is that he is still waiting for his dsl connection so he cant access the updates and mailing lists so i got to speak for him, since he is in berlin 600 km away from me i cant fix his problem either, but

[expert] bug in initscripts-6.40.2-33mdk and earlier versions, solution here!

2002-03-07 Thread Juergen Hammelmann
Hello together, I must say, that mandrake support for ippp devices is buggy now too! the line 94 from /sbin/ifup script have to be changed to ... OTHERSCRIPT="/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-${DEVICETYPE}" if [ -x ${OTHERSCRIPT} ]; then ${OTHERSCRIPT} ${CONFIG} $2 fi ... the exec comm

[expert] Bug using emacs in Mdk 8.1

2001-10-18 Thread Dean S. Messing
I'm experiencing a strange bug which I wonder if anyone else on the "experts" list has seen or can verify and report on: To tickle the bug: cp /usr/share/dict/words (or any other large text file) to /tmp The file should contain a large number of lines, say, greater than 5. Now edit /tmp/

Re: [expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-31 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Jul 31, 2001 at 09:41:27PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: [...] > > Can you do me a favour and try the php-4.0.6 rpms I built and put on > > www.rpmhelp.net? They seem to work fine over here, but I'm only using > > gettext() on my workstation at the moment which is running 4.0.6 (have > >

Re: [expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-31 Thread Jan Dittberner
Vincent Danen wrote: > > On Tue Jul 31, 2001 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: > > > > > I just tried to use the gettext support in php, but this seems to be > > > > broken in the Mandrake 8.0 package. An strace of php running my test > > > > script gave this: > > > > > > > > > > > > ls

Re: [expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-31 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Jul 31, 2001 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: > > > I just tried to use the gettext support in php, but this seems to be > > > broken in the Mandrake 8.0 package. An strace of php running my test > > > script gave this: > > > > > > > > > lstat64("/var/www/locale", {st_mode=S_IFDI

Re: [expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-31 Thread Jan Dittberner
Paul Cox wrote: > > On Sunday, Jul 22, 2001, Jan Dittberner wrote: > > > I just tried to use the gettext support in php, but this seems to be > > broken in the Mandrake 8.0 package. An strace of php running my test > > script gave this: > > > > > > lstat64("/var/www/locale", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|075

Re: [expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-31 Thread Paul Cox
On Sunday, Jul 22, 2001, Jan Dittberner wrote: > I just tried to use the gettext support in php, but this seems to be > broken in the Mandrake 8.0 package. An strace of php running my test > script gave this: > > > lstat64("/var/www/locale", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = > 0 > fs

[expert] bug in gettext support of php rpm?

2001-07-22 Thread Jan Dittberner
Hello, I just tried to use the gettext support in php, but this seems to be broken in the Mandrake 8.0 package. An strace of php running my test script gave this: lstat64("/var/www/locale", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 fstat64(1, {st_mode=S_IFIFO|0600, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 old

[expert] bug in arts-2.1.2-2mdk.i586.rpm

2001-05-28 Thread Tobias Marx
i've updated the artsd shipping with lm 8.0 with the security update rpms (arts, libarts). now, when i use xmms with the arts output plugin and play a wav with artsplay (from within licq), artsd will crash. when started from a terminal its outpud reads: [artsd] ** Warning ** MCOP ObjectManager: c

[expert] Bug in KDE-2.1.1 HTML-Index generating

2001-05-06 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hoi Folks, don't know if you already had this problem. but if you generate the Help-Files index in the KDe Control-Center/Help/index, the System tends to go crazy: Means, it generates an Endless File-List. This is caused by a linked-Link - e.g. a link pointing to itself. All you have to make h

Re: [expert] Bug Report: -ffast-math breaks perl-5.600-17mdk?

2000-12-27 Thread civileme
On Wednesday 27 December 2000 04:08, you wrote: > I can't seem to find the equivalent of bugzilla for Mandrake so I'm > reporting this here with the hopes it will make it back to appropriate > parties. https://qa.mandrakesoft.com > > I'm a developer in the process of packaging Perl 5.6.0 for ano

Re: [expert] Bug Report: -ffast-math breaks perl-5.600-17mdk?

2000-12-26 Thread Vincent Danen
On Tue Dec 26, 2000 at 10:08:20PM -0500, Robert Hardy wrote: > I can't seem to find the equivalent of bugzilla for Mandrake so I'm > reporting this here with the hopes it will make it back to appropriate > parties. https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ Sorry I can't give you any further help on this (pr

[expert] Bug Report: -ffast-math breaks perl-5.600-17mdk?

2000-12-26 Thread Robert Hardy
I can't seem to find the equivalent of bugzilla for Mandrake so I'm reporting this here with the hopes it will make it back to appropriate parties. I'm a developer in the process of packaging Perl 5.6.0 for another distribution. I'm all for optimization as long as the code still passes its tests.

[expert] Bug in Tetex / terminfo

2000-11-05 Thread Joerg Mertin
Hi Folks, while trying to fine-tune the tetex environement, I noticed that texconfig couldn't find the linux-termcap entries. This is due to the fact that /usr/lib/terminfo has moved to /usr/share/terminfo. 2 Ways of fixing this. Or you symlink the /usr/share/terminfo directory to the /usr/lib d

[expert] Bug in 7.2/KDE?

2000-10-20 Thread Shawn Hafen
Every time I tell KDE to use a background image for the logni manager it does not work, it seems to ignore me alltogether in that area. can someone with a background image on there login manager paste there kdmrc file in a mail for me so i can see the line it uses and just paste it into my kdmr

[expert] bug reporting broken?

2000-09-13 Thread Richard Donkin
I reported a bug in XFS/XFree86 setup a few days ago to the mandrake bugs mail alias - I got a bounce message back saying there was no such host. I was following the steps at http://www.linux-mandrake.com/bugs/, where the last reported bug appears to be from Feb 2000? Is anyone still using this

[expert] BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER

2000-09-07 Thread Jack
I have installed the FlightGear-0.7.4 and SimGear packages on Mandrake 7.1 but when I try to runfgfs I get the following error message: Running /usr/bin/fgfs --fg-root=/usr/lib/FlightGear BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dl-version.c: 210: _dl_check_map_versions: Assertion `needed != ((void *)0)' fa

[expert] bug knfsd

2000-09-01 Thread Beljouani, Christophe S
Hi, I'm using mandrake 7.0, there is a bug in this version when you try to use a NFS file system exported by a solaris box. For instance, it's impossible to compile C++ code with linux on a NFS file system. This bug is reported in the mandrake bug database with number 465 and 466, is there a fix

Re: [expert] Bug in kernel-rpm from mandrake-update.

2000-08-18 Thread Rial Juan
On Aug 19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ummdid you see all the talk on this list about a month or so ago about > how to do a Kernel upgrade? Nope; had a lot of exams and didn't have time to check the list for a month. > Look at Mandrake.user.org ? > Make a ramdisk to boot with? > ...oh and out

Re: [expert] Bug in kernel-rpm from mandrake-update.

2000-08-18 Thread Andrew George
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Rial Juan wrote: > > I used MandrakeUpdate to bring my system up to date, but it warned me that I > should upgrade the kernel rpms manually because there was a possible problem > with ReiserFS. So I did. Rebooted the computer but it gave me lots of problems, > resulting in a

[expert] Bug in kernel-rpm from mandrake-update.

2000-08-18 Thread Rial Juan
I used MandrakeUpdate to bring my system up to date, but it warned me that I should upgrade the kernel rpms manually because there was a possible problem with ReiserFS. So I did. Rebooted the computer but it gave me lots of problems, resulting in a kernel panic. Then I proceeded with making a wo

[expert] Bug report web pages out of date

2000-07-01 Thread Pierre Fortin
Are these pages no longer maintained...? http://www.linux-mandrake.com/bugs/db/ix/full.html Last time I visited seems to be the last time they were updated. Did _I_ break something? :^) Pierre

[expert] BUG in netconf

2000-06-28 Thread Bill Shirley
Title: I don't know what when wrong with the original message.  (I'm using Outlook 98, maybe that should be my first clue).  But here it is: There is a bug in netconf. Please follow the description of the problem below. I want to forward traffic between my two subnets, 192.168.1.0/24 (subne

Re: [expert] BUG in netconf

2000-06-28 Thread Civileme
Bill Shirley wrote: Shows an invalid encryption error. Try your message in plain ASCII Civileme

Re: [expert] BUG in netconf

2000-06-28 Thread Jean-Michel Dault
t; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [expert] BUG in netconf > [NON-Text Body part not included]

[expert] BUG in netconf

2000-06-28 Thread Bill Shirley
smime.p7m

Re: [expert] Bug with server install, paranoid security set

2000-04-26 Thread Alan Shoemaker
t; > Hi, > > It's not a bug, it's the paranoid security !! > May I suggest that you change the default umask from 077 to 022 in /etc/profile > ? > > -Message d'origine- > De: Mike Esler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date: mardi 25 avril 2000 16:43 &

Re: [expert] Bug with server install, paranoid security set

2000-04-26 Thread Mike Esler
OTECTED]] > Date: mardi 25 avril 2000 16:43 > À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet: [expert] Bug with server install, paranoid security set > > Hi all, > > I just installed Mandrake 7.0 on a Dell Poweredge 1300, 1 CPU. > > I chose server install, with paranoid security. >

RE: [expert] Bug with server install, paranoid security set

2000-04-26 Thread REGIMBEAU M InfoDpcCli
Hi, It's not a bug, it's the paranoid security !! May I suggest that you change the default umask from 077 to 022 in /etc/profile ? -Message d'origine- De: Mike Esler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: mardi 25 avril 2000 16:43 À: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: [expert]

[expert] Bug with server install, paranoid security set

2000-04-25 Thread Mike Esler
Hi all, I just installed Mandrake 7.0 on a Dell Poweredge 1300, 1 CPU. I chose server install, with paranoid security. After the install, normal users cannot execute files in /bin Permissions set on bin was 711 (rwx,x,x). Changing to 755 solved the problems I was having. -- Mike Esler Sverdr

Re: [expert] bug in KDE ( 7.0 Air )

2000-01-23 Thread root
yes, i used this way my last install yesturday, and it works much nicer... whats funny about the install yesturday is, when i created the account after the install, i could log into the new user account, but nothing but dark blue desktop. ie: no icons, task bar , nothing.used Cajus suggesti

Re: [expert] bug in KDE ( 7.0 Air )

2000-01-23 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Cajuswas this in the user account created during installation? In that account, I couldn't change the colors (I disliked the yellow title bars on the windows). So when the suggestion came from a message on this list to delete the account made during installation and make a new one, I did so

Re: [expert] bug in KDE ( 7.0 Air )

2000-01-23 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Son, 23 Jan 2000, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: >On Sam, 22 Jan 2000, Marek Suwalski wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>I can't change fonts in KDE on new Mandrake 7.0. Also I can't change language >>settings logged as user. >>This is a bug in KDE ? > >No. >I noticed this, too. The account is created with the wro

Re: [expert] bug in KDE ( 7.0 Air )

2000-01-23 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
On Sam, 22 Jan 2000, Marek Suwalski wrote: >Hi all, > >I can't change fonts in KDE on new Mandrake 7.0. Also I can't change language >settings logged as user. >This is a bug in KDE ? No. I noticed this, too. The account is created with the wrong gid/uid for some files. Just do a: # chown your_a

[expert] bug in KDE ( 7.0 Air )

2000-01-22 Thread Marek Suwalski
Hi all, I can't change fonts in KDE on new Mandrake 7.0. Also I can't change language settings logged as user. This is a bug in KDE ? Thanks for any help. Marek

[expert] Bug in dynamic linker

2000-01-22 Thread sl6ww
Hi, I've just upgraded to 7.0 (from 6.1) and I've been trying to get my Unreal Tournament server running again. However, the system just won't have it. Here's the error message: [root@sl6ww System]# ./ucc server BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 57: elf_get_dynamic_info: Assertion `

[expert] bug?

2000-01-21 Thread Sheldon Lee Wen
Hi, I'm posting this again b/c I've been having email difficulties and I'm not sure it got through the first time. If it did I apologize. I'm beginning to suspect that there may be a bug in the stock mandrake kernel that causes file system corruption. (I installed mandrake7.0 almost a week

Re: [expert] BUG: 6.1 initscripts-4.23-33mdk

1999-10-28 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Steve Philp wrote: > Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Steve Philp wrote: > > > > ^ is that a type-o ? i have 2mdk and 5mdk localy (i'd really hate to think > > i'm that outdated, but it is posible) > > Here's the header from rpm -qi initscripts, the pa

Re: [expert] BUG: 6.1 initscripts-4.23-33mdk

1999-10-28 Thread Steve Philp
Axalon Bloodstone wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Steve Philp wrote: > > ^ is that a type-o ? i have 2mdk and 5mdk localy (i'd really hate to think > i'm that outdated, but it is posible) Here's the header from rpm -qi initscripts, the package comes from the MacMillan 6.5 Deluxe. Name:

Re: [expert] BUG: 6.1 initscripts-4.23-33mdk

1999-10-28 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Steve Philp wrote: ^ is that a type-o ? i have 2mdk and 5mdk localy (i'd really hate to think i'm that outdated, but it is posible) > I was messing with /etc/rc.d/init.d/network tonight trying to help out > another user to get aliased interfaces to work correctly. I had hac

[expert] BUG: 6.1 initscripts-4.23-33mdk

1999-10-27 Thread Steve Philp
I was messing with /etc/rc.d/init.d/network tonight trying to help out another user to get aliased interfaces to work correctly. I had hacked the file to bits without creating a backup (shame on me, I know). I used 'rpm -e --nodeps' to remove the initscripts package thinking I could easily reins

[expert] BUG: 6.1 -- chkfontpath

1999-10-20 Thread sphilp
Another one... Trying to remove fonts from the xfs fontserver using the chkfontpath utility results in a segmentation fault: Script started on Wed Oct 20 22:05:34 1999 [root@tippy fonts]# chkfontpath --list Current directories in font path: 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc:unscaled 2: /usr/X11R6

[expert] BUG: 6.1 -- portmap

1999-10-20 Thread sphilp
Continuing the bug parade... I was cleaning up my system tonight, removing unnecessary packages. I removed the portmap package, but noticed that it showed up again in the output of 'rpm -qa'. Here's a transcript of the activity: Script started on Wed Oct 20 21:37:50 1999 [root@tippy /root]#

[expert] BUG: 6.1

1999-10-19 Thread sphilp
Two more bugs to report: 1) By default, Mandrake attempts to turn on DMA for available IDE devices. Attempting to copy the contents of a CDROM to my hard drive, I encountered the following errors: hdd: timeout waiting for DMA hdd: irq timeout: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComp

[expert] Bug in Control-Panel

1999-10-14 Thread Ken Archer
Has anyone else experienced a bug in the control-panel that comes with Cooker? When I try to setup my network I get a SyntaxError: non-default argument follows default argument (line 140) -- Kenneth Archer + San Antonio, Texas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #24980801 Powered by Linux ++ Mailed

[expert] Bug Fixes and stuff...

1999-09-16 Thread Drake
Ladies and Gentelman, I degress, someone has to come to Mr. Smith's defense here. He was voiceing his opionion on a product that could or could not be faulty. Instead of attacking him for his views, the developers should understand that and admitt that there MAY or MAY NOT be a problem. But t

Re: [expert] Bug Reports...

1999-09-15 Thread Vincent Danen
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ron Stodden wrote: > > It's been available on the FTP site as > > a pre-release or beta (if you will) for some time now. > > I know. Directory 6.1b contains this.There is now a new 6.1 > directory on the mirrors in addition, which Axalon tells me is not yet > the real

  1   2   >