-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Monday 10 November 2003 8:45 am, HaywireMac wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thought I'd give up waiting for the ISO's to be released and do a
> network install, but no go.
>
> Yes, PNP is turned off in the BIOS, if that matters in this case.
>
> Anyway, boots fro
Hi all,
Thought I'd give up waiting for the ISO's to be released and do a
network install, but no go.
Yes, PNP is turned off in the BIOS, if that matters in this case.
Anyway, boots from the floppy fine, choose FTP, then DHCP, identifies
the network card correctly, then when it tries to bring
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 15:49, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2003 08:31 pm, Damon Lynch wrote:
>
> > # mii-tool eth0 -F 100baseTx-FD
> >
> > has no effect. Any clues as to what I should do next?
> >
> IIRC, most cable and dsl modems run 10Mb/s half duplex. is eth0 the public
> interfac
On Friday 17 October 2003 08:31 pm, Damon Lynch wrote:
> # mii-tool eth0 -F 100baseTx-FD
>
> has no effect. Any clues as to what I should do next?
>
IIRC, most cable and dsl modems run 10Mb/s half duplex. is eth0 the public
interface?
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, in
Hello,
Perhaps someone can enlighten me as to why my network is running at 1/10
the speed it should be. The network cards on my firewall, which is
running MNF, are all running at 10mb/s. At least two should be running
at 100. I can see they are running slow by running this, for instance:
# mi
On Wednesday 03 Sep 2003 6:59 pm, Joerg Mertin wrote:
> Hi Anne,
>
> James is rihgt. If you don't have a decent DNS running within your
> LAN, you need to keep the canonical-Name <-> IP-Address
> translations in the /etc/hosts files on both systems
> (Printer-Server and Client).
>
Hi, Joerg. My re
Hi Anne,
James is rihgt. If you don't have a decent DNS running within your LAN, you
need to keep the canonical-Name <-> IP-Address translations in the /etc/hosts
files on both systems (Printer-Server and Client).
Also - make sure that Cups allows printing from this IP-Address.
Default it denie
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 03:52, Anne Wilson wrote:
> The only other mandrake box in the house does not have a printer.
> Today I needed to print from it. Using mcc/printerdrake it picked up
> all four instances of the printer on my box. However, any attempt to
> print a test page comes up with a
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 06:52 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> The only other mandrake box in the house does not have a printer.
> Today I needed to print from it. Using mcc/printerdrake it picked up
> all four instances of the printer on my box. However, any attempt to
> print a test page comes u
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 03:52, Anne Wilson wrote:
> The only other mandrake box in the house does not have a printer.
> Today I needed to print from it. Using mcc/printerdrake it picked up
> all four instances of the printer on my box. However, any attempt to
> print a test page comes up with a
The only other mandrake box in the house does not have a printer.
Today I needed to print from it. Using mcc/printerdrake it picked up
all four instances of the printer on my box. However, any attempt to
print a test page comes up with an error saying
unknown host anne-linux.lydgate.net
Any
Hey I had one of those hubs... used it for 3 weeks by putting Ice packs
(the non water kind) on top of it to keep it cold. *grin*
James
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 13:51, David Rankin wrote:
> The PNIC2 eth0 tx hung mystery has been solved. I though I would share the
> solution. Background: th
The PNIC2 eth0 tx hung mystery has been solved. I though I would share the
solution. Background: the eth0 error started showing up after a large
thunderstom rolled through Texas around Christmas. The problem would come and go
appearing mostly when the network was under high load due to backup.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, David Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> I have convinced myself that the PNIC2 eth0 messages I have been
> receiving lately are signs that my Linksys LNE 100TX pci NIC is slowly
> dying. It only flakes out under high load conditions like pulling a 600M
> backup across the ca
This time "David Rankin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
becomes daring and writes:
> At $14, it's hard to say no to another Linksys, but if I could benefit
> from getting a better card, that's what I'm here trying to find out. What
> are some of your favorites for a small server?
I love Intel NICs..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Rankin wrote:
> What are some of your favorites for a small server?
>
I have quite a few boxes with 3com 3C905Bs. I can find these pretty easily at
computer swap meets for $2 to $10 each (used). They are(were?) a bit pricey
new though. I have bo
Either stick with Linksys, or i would recommend the Netgear FA311 for
another low-budget card from BestBuy or something, very sturdy card.
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 22:02, David Rankin wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> I have convinced myself that the PNIC2 eth0 messages I have been
> receiving lately are
Ran some throughput tests about 6 months ago... rough test nothing fancy
3c905's seemed to give me 45mbs real throughput... the linksys about
42mbps Honestly I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't stay
with them the price/performance point is pretty solid from what I see.
(and Linksys
Listmates,
I have convinced myself that the PNIC2 eth0 messages I have been
receiving lately are signs that my Linksys LNE 100TX pci NIC is slowly
dying. It only flakes out under high load conditions like pulling a 600M
backup across the card. Anyway, after 2 years of faithfull service, I
woul
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:44:26 -0500 Mark Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Fortin wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:04:34 -0500 (EST) daRcmaTTeR
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:29:43 -0500
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 09:45 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
> >Jack and Melissa McSwain wrote:
>>
> > BTW has anyone noticed a dramatic increase in hack attempts in the last 2
> > to 3 weeks? Port scans show all the ports are stealth, and I have no
> > servers running or installed, but they still ma
Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:04:34 -0500 (EST) daRcmaTTeR
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierre Fortin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:29:43 -0500 Mark Weaver
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi List,
has anyone else noticed th
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:04:34 -0500 (EST) daRcmaTTeR
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierre Fortin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:29:43 -0500 Mark Weaver
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi List,
> > >
> > > has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandr
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierre Fortin wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:29:43 -0500 Mark Weaver
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi List,
> >
> > has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
> > dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
> > Shorew
heavy local CPU load.
With a faster modem connection, it never happened. And, since
I changed ISP, I always get a faster connection, so it's not a
problem any more.
Brian.
From: Mark Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Expert List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
On Tuesday 19 November 2002 12:29 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
> dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
> Shorewall firewall system.
>
> Mark
It has happened to me recently, but it looked li
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:29:43 -0500 Mark Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
> dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
> Shorewall firewall system.
>
> Mark
Any chance you're experienc
Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:29, Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi List,
has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
Shorewall firewall system.
Nope, just you :-) It's probably not shorewall, as
On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 10:29, Mark Weaver wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
> dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
> Shorewall firewall system.
>
Nope, just you :-) It's probably not shorewall, as shorewall'
Hi List,
has anyone else noticed the network connectivity in Mandrake 9.0 goes
dead periodically? It's very annoying and it seems to be linked to
Shorewall firewall system.
Mark
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
h interesting thought...
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 10:23, J. Grant wrote:
> Why not just click "Do not activate eth0 at boot time" (or config it
> yourself in the boot up sequence? Then you can do as you wish.
>
> JG
>
> James Sparenberg wrote:
> > Viable alternatives If I always knew ahead of
Why not just click "Do not activate eth0 at boot time" (or config it
yourself in the boot up sequence? Then you can do as you wish.
JG
James Sparenberg wrote:
Viable alternatives If I always knew ahead of time what the IP would
be. Problem is that I'm moving a lot to networks where either I don
Viable alternatives If I always knew ahead of time what the IP would
be. Problem is that I'm moving a lot to networks where either I don't
know the intended IP structure, or if I did set up once it won't be the
same this time.(customer sites). Right now I've got about 6 profiles in
this laptop an
Hi,
I posted a similar msg when using my laptop with multiple profiles,
I use fixed IP now so i dont get the wait problem you have (assuming
that is a dhcp & DNS prob).
There were some command line scripts to change the network IP etc etc
or you could just use static IP and change IP with MCC.
All,
Trying to find a way to switch network profiles on the fly with MDK
9.0 I've found a number of them that work at boot time, but since I
don't always know what I'm going to do until after a boot they are for
the most part useless. (Unless I want to do the Windows reboot dance.)
Using the
If your windows users are already using ICQ you can get a great GPL
client from micq.org. Its got all the features you will need.
JG
Rulon Holm wrote:
I am looking for a program that will allow me to send messages on a mixed
network(windows and mandrake)?
Is there such a program?
I need suggest
WinPopup (already on windows) + LinPopUp worked here (when I had
windows) Kinda like an instant messenger.
James
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 01:02, Rulon Holm wrote:
> I am looking for a program that will allow me to send messages on a mixed
> network(windows and mandrake)?
> Is there such a program
I am looking for a program that will allow me to send messages on a mixed
network(windows and mandrake)?
Is there such a program?
I need suggestions for both the windows side and the linux side.
-Thnx
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I've seen the profiles -- is there any documentation on what you can do with
them?
Based on this, and Todd's suggestion, I guess I can try to create some boot
time logic to see if the dock is present, and load (or not load) the network
accordingly.
It's just shame that it couldn't just fail grace
On Friday 11 October 2002 08:45 pm, John O'Shaughnessy wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've got a Dell Latitude C400 with mandrake 9.0.
>
> There is:
> 1. Inboard Ethernet (always present)
> 2. Dock Ethernet (present only when docked)
> 3. Wireless Ethernet PC Card (present only when inserted -- could be e
This may not be the most elegant way, but you could edit
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 and change the ONBOOT parameter to
no.
Then when you want to bring up eth1, type:
ifup eth1
When you want to undock the laptop, you can bring down eth1 first with:
ifdown eth1
On
John,
There may be other ways to do this but I'd go into
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and set ifcfg-eth1 where it says ONBOOT
to no and then when I do need it just do ifup eth1 and bring it up
manually.
James
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 20:45, John O'Shaughnessy wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've g
Greetings,
I've got a Dell Latitude C400 with mandrake 9.0.
There is:
1. Inboard Ethernet (always present)
2. Dock Ethernet (present only when docked)
3. Wireless Ethernet PC Card (present only when inserted -- could be either
docked or undocked.
When I installed the system, eth0 was the interna
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 15:39, Paul Stear wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am sure there is a simple solution to my problem, I am new to networking and
> have read the docs but still can't get it working.
>
> I have a dsl-504 router and 2 machines running Mandrake 8.2, both machines are
> connected to the
Hi all,
I am sure there is a simple solution to my problem, I am new to networking and
have read the docs but still can't get it working.
I have a dsl-504 router and 2 machines running Mandrake 8.2, both machines are
connected to the router which has 192.168.0.1 as the Internet. I can use the
On 08 Apr 2002 21:38:22 -0500
Dave Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Grabed a keyboard and said:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 14:08, K Montgomery wrote:
> > I have a laptop that runs the netfs service on boot in order
> > to mount a remote Samba filesystem. However, being a laptop,
> > it's not always conn
On Friday 02 August 2002 15:17, you wrote:
> On 2 Aug 2002 at 7:45, John Haywood wrote:
> > Has anybody come across any decent solutions? I've checked Sourceforge,
> > but most projects are either pre-alpha, dead, or contain no files
>
> You might look at ntop
> http://www.ntop.org
> It shoul
On 2 Aug 2002 at 7:45, John Haywood wrote:
> Has anybody come across any decent solutions? I've checked Sourceforge, but
> most projects are either pre-alpha, dead, or contain no files
>
You might look at ntop
http://www.ntop.org
It should do most of what you want.
Ray Warren
Want to
I've got a situation whereby a client allows its building's tenants to use
their LAN, and in some cases their mail server within the firewall.
They will also be able to set up their own servers in a DMZ for such things
as web/mail/sftp hosting.
What we need to be able to do is be able to obtai
Ok perfect!
So then all the servers on the inside should be on 255.255.0.0 right?
(webservers and all?)
Thanks
d.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Putteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 17, 2002 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network fun!
- Original
- Original Message -
From: "Belkie, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:49 PM
Subject: [expert] Network fun!
> Hey Guys!
> a little background on my problem.
>
> I have a Mandrake box 8.0 acting as a kind
Hey Guys!
a little background on my problem.
I have a Mandrake box 8.0 acting as a kinda DSL router.
It has 2 NIC cards. One with a Real IP and one with a non-routable
(192.168.1.1)
I have a web server on the inside on the following IP: 192.168.0.110
I have forwarding set up to send any request
hi,
am looking, how to measure my network-cards and how to tune the ideal size of
packets.
the reason is, I have different 3Coms in my linux-boxes. One box has 2x100MB
= 3c905TX and the other box has a one 10 MB = 3c900.
now I was looking for the program sray, but cannot find it on linux. is th
Dear Experts:
I had some extrange problems exporting a file
system via NFS... well, It seems that my wiring
is out of any standart in this "segment" for 100mbps..
so, I want to set my network card ( 10/100 autosensing),
to only 10Mbps... is it possible ?
Rodrigo Sanchez
DGF, U. de Chile
On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 08:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The esound demon can work across the network. You need to "wrap" called
> applications with one of the scripts, but is otherwise transparent.
>
I left out that I am using the X-Win32 X server software from a Windows
machine in order to conn
On 24 Apr 2002, K Montgomery wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I mostly use my Linux system remotely via XDMCP. Does anyone know about
> ways to play sound remotely over the network? I've heard of the
> "Network Audio System." Are there others? Has anyone been able to get
> one to work? (FWIW, I've got
Hi all,
I mostly use my Linux system remotely via XDMCP. Does anyone know about
ways to play sound remotely over the network? I've heard of the
"Network Audio System." Are there others? Has anyone been able to get
one to work? (FWIW, I've got Mandrake 8.2 and I mostly use Gnome.)
Thanks,
Ka
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 14:08, K Montgomery wrote:
> I have a laptop that runs the netfs service on boot in order to mount a
> remote Samba filesystem. However, being a laptop, it's not always
> connected to the network.
>
> Can I make it so that if netfs fails to find the Samba server on boot,
>
I have a laptop that runs the netfs service on boot in order to mount a
remote Samba filesystem. However, being a laptop, it's not always
connected to the network.
Can I make it so that if netfs fails to find the Samba server on boot,
it will attempt to connect repeatedly -- say, every 5 minutes
ken wrote:
>
> On Saturday 16 February 2002 04:47 pm, you wrote:
> > ken wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I've run into a couple of problems the *fm's I can find don't solve.
> > > How in 'ell do you UN configure the Internet connection sharing
> > >
> > > #1: While trying to set up Internet connec
On Saturday 16 February 2002 04:47 pm, you wrote:
> ken wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've run into a couple of problems the *fm's I can find don't solve.
> > How in 'ell do you UN configure the Internet connection sharing
> >
> > #1: While trying to set up Internet connection sharing I fsck'd my loc
ken wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I've run into a couple of problems the *fm's I can find don't solve.
> How in 'ell do you UN configure the Internet connection sharing
>
> #1: While trying to set up Internet connection sharing I fsck'd my local
> network e.g. NO NFS connection.. OK referring to a su
Hi all,
I've run into a couple of problems the *fm's I can find don't solve.
How in 'ell do you UN configure the Internet connection sharing
#1: While trying to set up Internet connection sharing I fsck'd my local
network e.g. NO NFS connection.. OK referring to a suggestion sent on this
su
At 08:12 AM 1/28/2002 -0600, Stephen Boulet wrote:
>Jobs are being sent to my printer (HP LaserJet 2100TN with built-in
>ethernet), which keeps printing until all the paper is gone.
>
>At the head of the sheet that gets repeatedly printed is: POST / HTTP/1.1.
>
>Here is a tail from my /var/log/cup
Jobs are being sent to my printer (HP LaserJet 2100TN with built-in
ethernet), which keeps printing until all the paper is gone.
At the head of the sheet that gets repeatedly printed is: POST / HTTP/1.1.
Here is a tail from my /var/log/cups:
192.168.1.1 - - [20/Jan/2002:23:09:49 -0600] "GET /
Ken Thompson wrote:
>
>
> > To answer your original question:
> > I am not aware of a way in MCC to add NFS control.
> > Nor is there a way to do NIS configuration, DNS configuration, Sendmail
> > (or postfix) configuration, nor add user accounts, or samba
> > configuration, etc...
> >
> > I thi
> To answer your original question:
> I am not aware of a way in MCC to add NFS control.
> Nor is there a way to do NIS configuration, DNS configuration, Sendmail
> (or postfix) configuration, nor add user accounts, or samba
> configuration, etc...
>
> I think MCC is a good begining on a systems
Ken Thompson wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 08 January 2002 11:49 pm, you wrote:
> > Ric Tibbetts wrote:
>
> > Just for the record: I still get stuck from time to time too, and bring
> > my questions here. It's a great forum! I just personally feel that any
> > question starting with, or containing the p
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 11:49 pm, you wrote:
> Ric Tibbetts wrote:
> Just for the record: I still get stuck from time to time too, and bring
> my questions here. It's a great forum! I just personally feel that any
> question starting with, or containing the phrase:
>
> When I click on the
Ric Tibbetts wrote:
>
> Ken Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Am I missing something???
> > I don't find a way with MCC to export or mount file systems on other
> > computers in the network. I have to go to linuxconf to do this. I seem to
> > remember in 8.0 there was a dialog for exporting and mounting.
>
Michael Leone wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 18:18, J. Craig Woods wrote:
>
> > Well, if at all possible, let us try to keep those kind of questions,
> > questions about beginners needing GUI tools, on the beginners list, and at
> > least *fake* a semblance to this being an "expert" list.
>
>
On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 18:18, J. Craig Woods wrote:
> Well, if at all possible, let us try to keep those kind of questions,
> questions about beginners needing GUI tools, on the beginners list, and at
> least *fake* a semblance to this being an "expert" list.
It's the experts who make the GUIs
> Well, if at all possible, let us try to keep those kind of questions,
> questions about beginners needing GUI tools, on the beginners list, and at
> least *fake* a semblance to this being an "expert" list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> J. Craig Woods
> UNIX/NT SA
> -Art is the illusion of spontaneity-
OK, b
At 04:08 PM 1/8/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>I DO work with the "Exports", "FSTAB", "HOSTS" and etc, but was thinking of
>those that are new to Linux.
>If Linux is ever going to make it as a viable desktop O/S for the masses it's
>going to have to have GUI tools.
>To a "purist", I suppose a GUI is sill
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 03:10 pm, you wrote:
> At 11:41 AM 1/8/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >Ken Thompson wrote:
> > > Am I missing something???
> > > I don't find a way with MCC to export or mount file systems on other
> > > computers in the network. I have to go to linuxconf to do this. I seem
>
At 11:41 AM 1/8/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Ken Thompson wrote:
> >
> > Am I missing something???
> > I don't find a way with MCC to export or mount file systems on other
> > computers in the network. I have to go to linuxconf to do this. I seem to
> > remember in 8.0 there was a dialog for exporting
Ken Thompson wrote:
>
> Am I missing something???
> I don't find a way with MCC to export or mount file systems on other
> computers in the network. I have to go to linuxconf to do this. I seem to
> remember in 8.0 there was a dialog for exporting and mounting.
Forget the GUI's. Spend a (very) l
Am I missing something???
I don't find a way with MCC to export or mount file systems on other
computers in the network. I have to go to linuxconf to do this. I seem to
remember in 8.0 there was a dialog for exporting and mounting.
--
Ken Thompson, North West Antique Autos
Payette, Idaho
Email:
I've just set up my network with a pentium 200mmx running as my
gateway/router/printserver/mailserver. I'm having problems when trying to
download large files. The download stalls. It doesn't seem to be at the
same point everytime. I also have problems losing a connection while playing
gam
ForeveR wrote:
>Is it too cpmplicated question??
>Hej somebody from Mandrake please reply
>
>>I sent following w/o any response few days ago can somobedy read it and
>>help if possible?
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>>
>>>Problem I have encountered was generated by new kernel (no matter which
>>>on
Is it too cpmplicated question??
Hej somebody from Mandrake please reply
> I sent following w/o any response few days ago can somobedy read it and
> help if possible?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> > Problem I have encountered was generated by new kernel (no matter which
> > one - everyone) when
I sent following w/o any response few days ago can somobedy read it and help
if possible?
Thanks in advance
> Problem I have encountered was generated by new kernel (no matter which one
> - everyone) when I'm downloading the new kernels (offical one from
> www.kernel.org) than the network scr
Problem I have encountered was generated by new kernel (no matter which one -
everyone) when I'm downloading the new kernels (offical one from
www.kernel.org) than the network script on system startup fails already on
'lo' interface with comment "address familly not supported by kernel" which
I am posting this as a thank you and follow-up;
With the history of the original thread.
After trying it all once again I ended up swapping out an
old WD card from another machine and yes IT ALL started to work!!!
However swapping out the old vibra 16 sound card for an old
but trusty SB 32 A
Hi everybody,
After succesfully installing Mandrake 8.1 on my PII 333MHz, and checking
everything was running allright (network included), I decided to download
kernel 2.4.16 sources for compiling it on my own.
Compilation and installation session run without apparent problems. It was
on booting
hi
i have 2 computers connected to each other via a 5 port hub, i can ssh
to the other machine and vise versa withouth any problems but if i try
to transfer any file with about 1 or more mb
tail -f /var/log/messages gives me
Dec 1 23:34:24 Main sshd: succeeded
Dec 1 23:34:45 Main sshd(pam_u
from 50 ohm cable linking between pc's just as well as
apart from 2 ports all
have radios on the end !
cya
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
Co
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 15:52 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I think you can use that netgear card via the "tulip" driver.
>
> -- Asheesh.
No, actually it's the natsemi.o (National Semiconductor).
I use it and everything works and I'm a happy camper after all :)
wobo
--
"... and anyway, an htm
I think you can use that netgear card via the "tulip" driver.
-- Asheesh.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 17:22 schrieben Sie:
> > "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
>
> > I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to
> > v
ECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
>
> "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
> >
> [snip]
>
> I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
>
> Until a
OK, I'm answering to my own mail b/c there's an update:
> Right now I got a cheap NIC called "Netgear FA311 Fast Ethernet PCI
> Card". Problem is, it comes with Linux drivers (!) but only for Red
> Hat 6.x and the given files will not compile b/c the makefile is
> counting on kgcc. Duh... So I ca
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 17:22 schrieben Sie:
> "Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
> [snip]
> I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to
> verify...
>
> Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table
> actually makes it to the other machine (basic connectivity),
> rout
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
[snip]
I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table actually makes
it to the other machine (basic connecti
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
[snip]
I'm waiting to hear back from Wolfgang on the list of things to verify...
Until a "ping -br " which bypasses the routing table actually makes
it to the other machine (basic connectivity), routing tables changes are not
going to help (unless the network code i
is 10.0.n.n
If the host address is dynamically assigned , a route from the host to each ethernet
port needs to be entered
and the routing beyound
HTH
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
"Richard Bown (QMW)" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> It would help Wolfgang if you could send the routing table on both machines !
>From Wolfgang's *first* post:
> Desktop:
> 217.5.98.14 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
> 10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
2001 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Network problem
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> > OK... give us the results of:
> >
> > ping -br 255.255.255.255
> > ping -br 192.168.0.255
>
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> OK... give us the results of:
>
> ping -br 255.255.255.255
> ping -br 192.168.0.255
Desktop (disconnected from internet)
[root@molch wobo]# ping -br 255.255.255.255
connect: Network is unreachable
ifconfig (disconnected from internet) s
Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 17:12 schrieben Sie:
> > OK... give us the results of:
> >
> > ping -br 255.255.255.255
> > ping -br 192.168.0.255
>
> Desktop (disconnected from internet)
>
> [root@molch wobo]# ping -br 255.255.255.255
> connect: Network is unrea
Am Dienstag, 27. November 2001 19:07 schrieben Sie:
> by means of some power of darkness, when you connect both nics
> trough the cross-cable you are are shutting the electrical signals
> to a very low level, that isn't enough to keep the network
> connection.
>
> this don't happen with the adsl
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
