[Fink-devel] my packages

Folks: Please change the maintainer field on my packages to 'unmaintained'. I've had zero time to update them lately, and I think things will get done faster if I just get out of the way. -Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313 NOAA/OAR/CDC R/PSD1FAX : (303)49

Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran/g95 in ftw3, hdf5 and octave

Sébastien Maret wrote: > Jeffrey, > > I've made some trivial changes in your fftw3, hdf5 and octave packages > so they use gfortran instead on g95 (which isn't present in the 10.5 > branch). > > Do you mind if I commit the changes? > > Sébastien > Sébastien: Please do, thanks. -Jeff -- Jeff

Re: [Fink-devel] Require new libversioned packages for those using Frameworks?

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > >> Benjamin Reed wrote: >> >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Daniel Macks wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > because libR.dylib is now in .../Versions/2.5/Resouces/lib/libR.dylib . > S

Re: [Fink-devel] numpy package?

Jack Howarth wrote: > I noticed that Fedora 7 has now replaced the Numeric and Numarray > packages with the new Numpy package that supercedes them. Do we > have any plans on migrating our packages over to Numpy as well? > Jack > Jack: There's been a numpy package for ages, it

Re: [Fink-devel] Framework Python build

Blair Zajac wrote: > We have a large number of PyQt apps on Linux for a special effect > studio. We use PyQt apps to manage a large render farm for special > effects, examining artwork, playing back renders at high resolutions, > and other apps for lighting and compositing, etc. > > More of our

Re: [Fink-devel] pythons slow on startup

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Kurt Schwehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> I have two mac boxes... on my G5 machine, all pythons >> are slow to start: >> >> time python2.4 -c "pass" >> >> real0m2.726s >> >> time /usr/bin/python -c "pass" >> >> real0m2.909s >> user0m0.023s >> sys 0

Re: [Fink-devel] revised gcc4 packaging

Jack Howarth wrote: > Jeff, >We may need to take this onto the gcc mailing list since > I don't have a Mac Intel machine to test with. However, my > understanding was that all of Sandro's patches were applied > to gcc 4.2 and did build libffi and libjava on MacIntel (but > not at -m64). Are you

Re: [Fink-devel] revised gcc4 packaging

Jack Howarth wrote: > The attached packaging now properly allows multilib builds of the > c, c++, objc, fortran and java languages on Darwin PPC for both > 32-bit and 64-bit processor machines. It also will allow Darwin > Intel to do a --disable-multilib build of the same (since the > the x86_64 Da

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 issue with Apple as from XCode 2.4

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Sebastien Maret wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am getting the following error (warning?) for every Fortran program >>> I compile with Fink g95 (0.90

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 issue with Apple as from XCode 2.4

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Sebastien Maret wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am getting the following error (warning?) for every Fortran program >>> I compile with Fink g95 (0.90

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 issue with Apple as from XCode 2.4

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting the following error (warning?) for every Fortran program > I compile with Fink g95 (0.90-1) on 10.4.7 x86: > > % cat test.f > program hello > print *,'Hello World' > end > > % g95 test.f > /var/tmp//ccGrwDXl.s:59:indirect jmp witho

Re: [Fink-devel] Python variants

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Sebastien Maret wrote: >> >>> Now that Python 2.5 is out, how many variants should we maintain for Python >>> versioned packages? >>> >> Sebasti

Re: [Fink-devel] Python variants

Sebastien Maret wrote: > Now that Python 2.5 is out, how many variants should we maintain for Python > versioned packages? > > Sebastien > > > Sebastien: python23,python24 and python25 are all available in the 10.4 distribution. So, I'd say three (as long as the package works with 2.3, I su

[Fink-devel] newly orphaned packages

All: I'm giving up the following packages: abiword aspell autocutsel dejagnu epstool extutils-f77 freetype2 freetype219 gcc4 ghostscript ghostscript-fonts gtk+extra17 gv imagemagick imagemagick-nox ispell latex-xft-fonts lesstif libwww nedit odcctools pine pine-ssl plotmtv plotutils pmw-py pwm p

Re: [Fink-devel] URL escape codes

TheSin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'm pretty sure %% expands to %, so that might work > - --- > TS > http://southofheaven.org/ > Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. > > On 3-Aug-06, at 5:59 AM, Jeff Whita

[Fink-devel] URL escape codes

Is there any way to use URL escape codes in the Source field, such as ftp://anonymous%40g95%2Eorg:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/v0.9/g95_source.tgz without fink complaining about 'unknown percent expansion'? -Jeff -- Jeffrey S. Whitaker Phone : (303)497-6313 NOAA/OAR/CDC R/PSD1FAX : (3

Re: [Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

Jack Howarth wrote: > Jeff, >The new lammpi and openmpi packages that I maintain now use gcc4 > I also see that raster3d, pdftk, apbs, apbs-mpi, ccp4-onlylibs-dev, > ccp4, mosflm, mosflm-small, plplot, maloc, maloc-mpi, pdb2pqr and > tinker use gcc4 as well. Most of those are probably packages

Re: [Fink-devel] libgfortran .so bump

David Fang wrote: >> So the next time we update gcc4, we will have to contend with the >> breakage of any package that uses gfortran from gcc4. >> Jack >> > > Hi, > Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package > into release-branches? e.g. gcc4.0 (cu

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 split

David Fang wrote: >>> Would it be possible (and a good idea?) to split the gcc4 package >>> into release-branches? e.g. gcc4.0 (currently 4.0.3), gcc4.1 (currently >>> 4.1.1) and gcc4.2 (whatever recent snapshot)? With the current 10.4 >>> trees, I have to install my own (FSF) 4.0.x and 4

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Hello scientists and students, your input please

David H. wrote: > Dear selected community (tricky ehy...) > > It know that Fink has had a significant impact on the scientific > community. There are a couple of packages which are in darwinports but > not inf Fink and I would like to get a handle on how popular those > missing packages are in the

Re: [Fink-devel] autogen 5.8.4

Daniel Macks wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:36:13PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Jeff Whitaker just pointed out to me that gcc4 can't be tested on >> Macintel >> because autogen won't build with gcc 4.0. Looking at the autogen home page >>

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc 4.2 issues solved

Jack Howarth wrote: > Peter, >I'll test it. Hopefully we can get the odcctools update into > fink soon and Jeff can create a new gcc4 from the next snapshot > with '--disable-multlib' dropped and MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET > unset for that package. I would also not that Mike Stump has > made a r

Re: [Fink-devel] plplot fails on 10.4-T

Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > A user reported the following error of the latest plplot (5.6.1) on > 10.4-transitional: > > ... > gcc-3.3 -Wno-long-double -o massage massage.o -L/sw/lib/python2.4/ > config -L/sw/lib -lm > perl /sw/src/fink.build/plplot-5.6.1-2/plplot-5.6.1/bindings/octave/

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.4 intel and gfortran

William Scott wrote: On Sat, 20 May 2006, Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: William Scott wrote: Hi folks: With the new gcc4 gfortran/odcctools I get errors of the following form: /sw/lib/odcctools/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: __d collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Is there

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.4 intel and gfortran

William Scott wrote: Hi folks: With the new gcc4 gfortran/odcctools I get errors of the following form: /sw/lib/odcctools/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: __Unwind_GetIPInfo collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Is there a simple workaround? Bill Bill: Are you intel or ppc? I have a feeling that

Re: [Fink-devel] hdf5 fails to compile on intel mac

Martin Costabel wrote: Jon Cline wrote: I have been attempting without success over the past few days to compile hdf5-1.6.5-1003 on an intel mac and am current stuck. I'm left with: /sw/bin/g95 -I. -O -I. -c H5fortran_types.f90 -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/H5fort ran_types.lo In file H5fortran_

Re: [Fink-devel] fortran and intel (again, sorry)

Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: Yesterday I impulse-purchased an imac intel. Today, in order to avoid parental responsibilities, I am trying to get fink working. (I accidently transfered my older /sw from my G4 laptop and a surprising amount works, but today moved that out of th

Re: [Fink-devel] g95 fails to compile on Intel Mac

Kirk Volland wrote: I'm working toward getting Octave compiled on my MacBook. To that end, I read that g77 won't work to compile it, so I thought I'd build a copy of g95 and try and use it. Well... no luck with g95 compiling. Here is the failure. Any hints? gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DX8

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: g77--> gfortran transition

William Scott wrote: I've been working on updating my CCP4 package for gfortran in collaboration with the ccp4 developers since late last November. It is not always simple, and there are still programs that appear to compile fine but suffer run-time errors (in fact, I am seeing more of

[Fink-devel] g77--> gfortran transition

Hi: Since gcc4-4.1 is now in 10.4 and 10.4-transitional unstable, the transition from g77 to gfortran can begin. AFAICT, there are 3 things that need to be changed in most packages that depend on g77: 1) remove the 'Architecture: powerpc' field. 2) change 'BuildDepends: g77' to 'BuildDepen

Re: [Fink-devel] HDF5 problem

Sebastien Maret wrote: Compilation of gdl-0.8.11 fails on 10.4.3 because it tries to link to the HDF5 library in the HDF5's build directory. Looks like HDF5 think it lives in /sw/src/fink.build: % h5cc -showconfig | grep LDFLAGS LDFLAGS: -L/sw/src/fink.build/hdf5-1.6.4-2/hdf5-1.6.4/src/.libs -L

Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran (again)

William Scott wrote: Hi Folks: Would using gfortran instead of g77 with Xcode 2.2 help to avoid some of the observed problems with Xcode 2.2? I've avoided installing this because of all the warnings. Bill: I've you've rebuilt the latest version of g77 in unstable after upgrading to Xco

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci scipy-py.info,1.4,1.5

Sebastien Maret wrote: Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3504 Modified Files: scipy-py.info Log Message: New upstream version. Index: scipy-p

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

Jeff Whitaker wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcod

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

Martin Costabel wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: [] Peter: I can't remember why JFM added the link to /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/libgcc.a to g77 in the first place, but if I remove it and rebuild g77, it seems to work fine (on 10.4.2 with Xcode 2.1). The reason was th

Re: [Fink-devel] proper fix for g77 package?

Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jack Howarth wrote: | Since a new gromacs, version 3.3 has been released, I will be | updating the fink gromacs package soon. However, we will need to | address the breakage in g77 from Xcode 2.2 for the required | lammpi

Re: [Fink-devel] plplot linking error after upgrade -> Xcode 2.2

Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | Martin Costabel wrote: | |> Peter O'Gorman wrote: |> [] |> |>> The only thing I can think to do is to link with |>> - -L/usr/lib/gcc/%m-apple-darwin8/4.0.0 |>> -L/usr/lib/gcc/%m-apple-darwin8/4.0.1 |>> -

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77/f2c BuildDepends problem

Daniel Macks wrote: fort77-1.18-17 lists Depends:f2c, but f2c (20030428-2) is BuildDependsOnly:true. The bin/fort77 script contains an explicit call to the f2c binary, so the Depends makes sense. Is the BDO flag wrong? Or are there other alternate packages of f2c's files, requiring that f2c rema

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 and libmpfr-dev

David Fang wrote: Hi all, Having trouble updating the gcc4 (4.0.1-2) package, 10.4-transitional. Is gcc4 missing a BuildDepends on libmpfr-dev? Because having only gmp installed, configure gives me: - sniplet checking for correct version of gmp.h... yes checking for MPFR.

Re: [Fink-devel] '$MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET mismatch: now "10.4" but "10.3" during configure' error compiling clearsilver with python2.4

Jeremy Higgs wrote: Hi everyone, I'm trying to update the trac, silvercity and clearsilver packages to support python 2.4 (as well as trac to the latest version), but I'm having an issue compiling clearsilver on 10.4.1... I get this following: /sw/bin/python2.4 setup.py build_ext --inplac

[Fink-devel] Re: scipy_distutils is missing from scipy

Sébastien Maret wrote: I get the following error when importing scipy.interpolate [MARETMACLT2:~] smaret% python Python 2.4.1 (#1, Apr 1 2005, 10:26:34) [GCC 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1671)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from sc

[Fink-devel] Re: scipy_distutils is missing from scipy

Sébastien Maret wrote: I get the following error when importing scipy.interpolate [MARETMACLT2:~] smaret% python Python 2.4.1 (#1, Apr 1 2005, 10:26:34) [GCC 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1671)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from sc

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.4 and fortran

William Scott wrote: Hi folks: I think the last g77 release is 3.4.x. Are there any plans to make this available for the 10.4 branch of fink, or will it be required to use gcc-fortran? The reason I am asking is that I maintain a number of fortran-based packages that behave better (or sometimes

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:58:45AM -0700, Jeff Whitaker wrote: Can we get rid of the kernel's version-number in its installation directory? If gcc builds OS-version-specific stuff, we have a package portability problem... dan Dan: I haven't been able to figure

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

Peter O'Gorman wrote: Looks like --enable-threads=posix builds a libobjc-gnu.dylib ... gee, that's obvious, I spotted that right away (NOT!). Peter That's the default I guess, since I've already got that lib. I went ahead and checked in the gcc4 package if you want to give it a try (best to in

Re: gcc4 package (was Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null)

Peter O'Gorman wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: I've created a gcc4 package the builds everything (c,c++,f95,objc,java,ada). I could just add Provides and Conflicts gfortran and be done with it? Is there any reason to split them up? As long as you added a prefix or suffix to the

Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null

Peter O'Gorman wrote: You don't have to add the libgfortran patch if it is a pain. I expect someone on gcc-patches will eventually respond to my pinging and this will make it into a release. Peter: I put it in and it compiles fine - haven't tried to make a shared lib though. gfortran passes th

Re: [Fink-devel] SOLVED: gcc unlinks /dev/null

Peter O'Gorman wrote: Well, it took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I just sent this message to gcc-patches: which solves the issue for me. The bug has been reopened and is at . Jeff, could you please app

[Fink-devel] Re: cctools-gcc4.info

Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Whitaker wrote: | Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages | In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv12422 | | Added Files: | cctools-gcc4.info | Log Message: | New placeh

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: cctools-gcc4.info

Peter O'Gorman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Whitaker wrote: | Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages | In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv12422 | | Added Files: | cctools-gcc4.info | Log Message: | New placeh

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem running scipy with Python2.4

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have trouble running scipy-py24 with python2.4. Here what I get when I try to import the module: [Sebastien-Marets-computer:~] smaret% python2.4 Python 2.4 (#1, Dec 30 2004, 21:03:54) [GCC 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 1671)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright

Re: [Fink-devel] octave question

different for whatever OS X version the user had installed (I happened to have 10.3.4 installed when I build octave). Is it possible to fix this, maybe by passing --build=powerpc-apple-darwin to the configure params? (I've mailed the maintainer - Jeff Whitaker - twice but got no response. A

Re: [Fink-devel] octave question

different for whatever OS X version the user had installed (I happened to have 10.3.4 installed when I build octave). Is it possible to fix this, maybe by passing --build=powerpc-apple-darwin to the configure params? (I've mailed the maintainer - Jeff Whitaker - twice but got no response. A

Re: [Fink-devel] octave related plplot error

Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi, I am the maintainer of plplot, and a fink build of an upcoming release gave me the following error: ... Making all in octave Making all in PLplot Making all in support make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. Making all in dem

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages wxpython-py.info,NONE,1.1 wxpython-py.patch,NONE,1.1

Blair Zajac wrote: Jeff Whitaker wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25031 Added Files: wxpython-py.info wxpython-py.patch Log Message: New upstream version - now uses variants. Hi Jeff, I'm gett

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-users] Building and installation directory.

Andrea Riciputi wrote: I know it's not a problem, but I think that a traceback that report a not exsisting directory it's not nice and could be misleading. As stated by Daniel Macks replacing --prefix=%i with --root=%d seems to fix the issue. So I'd like to know your opinion about this. Do you

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/editors vim.info,1.8,1.9

On Tue, 18 May 2004, Daniel Macks wrote: jswhit committed: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/editors Modified Files: vim.info Log Message: New upstream verion. Index: vim.info === RCS file: /cvsroot/fink

[Fink-devel] apps in Fink - a final decision?

All: I'm working on a new r-base package which will include R built as a framework and R.app (in addition to the command line X11 version of R). I went back and re-read the thread on .apps in Fink, but it didn't seem like there was any consensus on the issue of whether to install symlinks or ali

Re: .app's in Fink (was Re: [Fink-devel] CFD: Installing Frameworks from fink packages)

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Martin Costabel wrote: > > I believe we have one or two command line apps in fink which are binary. > > One of them is aquaterm that installs an app into /sw/Applications. I > never liked the fact that this is a binary installation, even when you > do "fink install". But I thi

Re: [Fink-devel] Yet another problem with biggles-py23.

Andrea: I just updated plotutils in 10.3/unstable so that it no longer requires gcc2. -Jeff On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Andrea Riciputi wrote: > Hi, > I've seen biggles has been reintroduced in 10.3 tree but the > installation script doesn't start. Here it is what I get: > > > Zeus:~/Installs andrea$

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci proj.info,NONE,1.1

Fixed - thanks. -Jeff On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Daniel Macks wrote: > Jeff Whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci > > Added Files: > > proj.info > [snip] > > SplitOff: << > > Pac

Re: [Fink-devel] hdf5 1.6.1-1 not building

Blair: Fixed now. -Jeff On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Blair Zajac wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting this error when attempting to build hdf 1.6.1-1 > with 10.3: > > $ fink install hdf5 hdf5-bin hdf5-shlibs > /usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink install hdf5 hdf5-bin hdf5-shlibs > Information about 2195 packages re

Re: [Fink-devel] applesystemfonts anyone?

Martin: Applesystemfonts installs fine for me on a fresh 10.3 install. Perhaps it is choking on one of the fonts in /Users/*/Library/Fonts? What happens if you remove that out from the list in the .info file? -Jeff On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > It would be nice to have the appl

Re: [Fink-devel] problems with g77 3.4 segmentation faults

William and Martin: I've verified that the latest released g77 (3.3.2) does not have the assembler bug present in 3.1,3.3.1 and Apple's 3.3-20030304. As Martin pointed out, the reason I put the 3.4 package in, even though it is not a released version of g77, is that it was the only version that d

Re: [Fink-devel] fink binary g77 and ddd collide over /sw/lib/libiberty.a

Blair: This is fixed in the newer versions of g77 (but you have to install from source). -Jeff On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Blair Zajac wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting a collision on trying to install the binary g77 and > binary ddd on a single system: > > # apt-get install ddd > Reading Package Lists..

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote: > > > > > 3.3 is not officially supported in fink yet, there will be a 10.2-gcc3.3 > > distribution shortly however. Some packages need 2.95, but that is > > handled automatically by the package. There are no packages in fink now > > that need 3.3.

Re: [Fink-devel] fort77 can't be compiled.

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Pascal J.Bourguignon wrote: > > > > Pascal: If you installed the gcc3.3 update, "sudo /usr/sbin/gcc_select > > 3.1" and rebuild f2c and fort77. If you haven't installed gcc 3.3, I have > > no idea what's wrong. > > Ok, so some fink packages need 3.3, other need 3.1 (or is it

Re: [Fink-devel] g77 version 3.1

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Hi, > > Now I have the following problem: cernlib builds with both g77 version > 3.1. and 3.3(.1). However, doing some extensive tests shows that the > version build with g77 3.3(.1) has some problems with math algorithms. > The cernlib is not being activ

[Fink-devel] proposed fix for as problem

Since the broken assembler in the Dec2002 Dev Tools update seems only to affect g77, I propose to implement this fix: 1) create an "as" package, which builds an assembler from opendarwin cvs (that actually works with g77). This is installed as %p/bin/odas. 2) update the g77 package to depend on

Re: [Fink-devel] g77 error [Forwarded from: jsw@cdc.noaa.gov]

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Ben Hines wrote: > We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken > fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since > they do not work and it is fixable. > > -Ben I would wait and see if it is fixed in the Panter Dev Tools. I'll bet y

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:29 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote: > > It works pretty well for emacs, What do you think? > > Although I quite like this idea, what about compiled C python modules, > the binaries are not compatible across python versions? P

Re: [Fink-devel] Moving swig to stable (to be able to move svn-client)

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Max Horn wrote: > One serious problem I see with swig (if you have unstable enabled - so > this is not meant as an argument against moving it to stable, I guess) > is that it defaults to install python23 right now (at least it does > here) due to a versioned dependency on pytho

Re: [Fink-devel] python modules do not comply with policy

On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Hi, > > Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will > go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-/site-packages). Peter: Yes - this is true. > > Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make > numeric-py22 and

[Fink-devel] Re: CVS: dists/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-systemxfree86-4.3.0-1.info,NONE,1.1 xfree86-4.3.0-1.patch,NONE,1.1xfree86-upgrade-20030228-1.info,NONE,1.1

On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Max Horn wrote: > Ah > > > I wasn't aware that we had resolved all the issues with this? And > that we agreed to release it to unstable... The discussion on this on > fink-devel must have slipped by me. For example, I completly missed > all the responses to Masanori's worr

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 strategy

Folks: Unless I hear objections, I'd like to commit these two packages to unstable xfree86-4.3.0-1.info (which builds the new "unified" xfree86 4.3 package) and xfree86-upgrade-20030228-1.info,patch (which is a shell script that performs the necessary dpkg -r --force-depends to install xfree86

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.3

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > Well, according to the X website, XFree86 4.3 is due to get tagged > tomorrow. Has anything been decided yet on how we are going to handle > the 4.3 upgrade? > Ben: I propose the following: 1) add an xfree86-4.3 package which will requires dpkg -r

Re: [Fink-devel] python23 alpha; epoch support documentation

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Andrea Riciputi wrote: > > I agree with you v2.3 is quite stable, but as far as I can see the > problem is that I can't install some Python modules under v2.2 tree. Andrea: I've renamed it 2.3a2 to make it clear that it's alpha. > > When I try, for example, "% fink install

[Fink-devel] Re: python23 alpha; epoch support documentation

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote: > > Esp. once the real 2.3 is released (due June, see also > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0283.html). Yes with the dpkg version > scheme, 2.3a comes after 2.3. However, now that we have epochs, this > isn't really a problem anymore... you can release 2.3a2, 2

Re: [Fink-devel] gnuplot install: ftp file missing

there is a command called "fink selfupdate-cvs" Learn to use it. Often. URLs frequently change, and packages are constantly updated. -Jeff On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, John W.Whitworth wrote: > File to be downloaded is not present on ftp server, see below > > > > information about 924 packages re

Re: Packaging PyObjC Re: [Fink-devel] imagemagick build failure

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > BTW: how about a pybojc fink package? > > I was going to do a 0.8 fink package, but there have been enough > changes and improvements to PyObjC that waiting until 0.9-- which > should happen soon-- is prudent. Look forward to it. > > It raises

Re: [Fink-devel] imagemagick build failure

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Imagemagick is failing to build on my system -- I have tried rebuilding > freetype2, but it still fails. Any ideas? > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../magick -I.. -I.. -I../magick > -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/X11R6/in

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > > I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in > > experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned > > dependency on the

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.2.99.901 package redux

Folks: I've put a new revision of the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package in experimental/jswhit. This package no longer contains a versioned dependency on the old xfree86 4.2.1.1 packages (to allow for an upgrade), but instead requires a dpkg -r --force-depends to remove the 4.2.1.1 packages. I've also

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 pre-release package

Max et al: I've pulled the xfree86 package (and the xfree86-base, xfree86-base-threaded upgrades it depends on) from unstable and put them in expermental/jswhit/x11-system. Probably should have put them there in the first place - I apologize for that. Ben H - I would appreciate it if you could k

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 pre-release package

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ben Hines wrote: > > On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 04:02 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > >> > >> Why exactly does it depend on xfree86 4.2.1.1? Is it only for the > >> purposes of upgrad

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 pre-release package

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Ben Hines wrote: > > > Provides/Conflicts/Replaces should work fine.. the only thing that > needs to be done is to change ALL versioned dependencies in other > packages on xfree* to add "| xfree86". Then Provides/Conflicts/Replaces > should work fine and this abuse of the fink

Re: [Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 pre-release package

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > > Hrm. > > This worked OK for me when I was building it, but it broke when I tried > getting it through apt to my other machine. Apt ended up > half-installing things and then xfree86-base's checks for an existing > X11 kicked it out. My other machine h

[Fink-devel] xfree86 4.3 pre-release package

Folks: I've just committed a package for xfree86 4.2.99.901 - the last pre-release before 4.3. This package supersedes all the previous xfree86 variants (-base, -rootless and -threaded). However, in order to avoid requiring a "sudo dpkg -r --force-depends" I've made it depend on new versions of

[Fink-devel] xfree86-4.3 and /etc/fonts

Folks: I have come across a potential problem while putting together the xfree86-4.2.99.901 package. Xfree86 4.3 installs a font database for fontconfig in /etc/fonts. When you use fink to remove the xfree86 package containing /etc/fonts, dpkg blithely blows away the symlink /private/etc --> /

Re: [Fink-devel] Scigraphica and Xchemdraw

Peter: No, I think the problems with scigraphica run much deeper than that. I've sent many bug reports to the developers, but it looks as if it is basically unmaintained right now. So, I don't think there is any possibility of getting the scigraphica package in the 10.2 tree in the near future.

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.3.0 close

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David R. Morrison wrote: > Jeff, > > What I've just done with the major teTeX upgrade is to put a lot of > "Replaces" and "Provides" lines but almost no "Conflicts" lines. > > What this does is enables the user to upgrade without dpkg complaining. > Any file which exists in one

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.3.0 close

On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Max Horn wrote: > At 5:52 Uhr -0700 01.02.2003, jeff whitaker wrote: > >Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed > >with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace > >both xfree86-base and xfre

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.3.0 close

Ben: Thanks for the update. I'm somewhat at a loss of how to proceed with a 4.3.0 package. Since it contains thread support, it should replace both xfree86-base and xfree86-base-threaded. At the same time, I'd like to merge the -base and -rootless variants. So, the new package should replace x

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Apple's FFT(w), BLAS and LAPACK

John: It's not quite that simple. Most packages need to be patched to use "-framework vecLib" instead of "-L%p/lib -latlas -llapack -lcblas". The fft stuff is problematic since I'm pretty sure the vecLib fft has a different calling interface than fftw. No virtual package is necessary - any 10.2

Re: [Fink-devel] Octave-forge: To add or not to add path...

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Per Persson wrote: > Hi, > I just subitted an upated package for octave-forge to the tracker. > > There is one part that I don't particularly like and would like some > feedback on: > Octave-forge is a set of extensions to octave and must have its path > added to octave's sear

Re: [Fink-devel] fink xfree86 and Apple X11

On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Benjamin Reed wrote: > On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 08:30 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > > > > Apple's X11 will work with fink xfree86-4.2.1.1 on 10.2.3. I tested > > this > > by installing xfree86-base, xfree86-rootless (and shlibs), then

[Fink-devel] fink xfree86 and Apple X11

Apple's X11 will work with fink xfree86-4.2.1.1 on 10.2.3. I tested this by installing xfree86-base, xfree86-rootless (and shlibs), then copying over /Applications/X11.app, /usr/X11R6/bin/Xquartz, /usr/X11R6/bin/quartz-wm and /usr/X11R6/lib/libapplexp.1.0.dylib from an Apple X11 installation. Do

Re: [Fink-devel] Who should Provide X11 ?

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Ben Hines wrote: > > On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 10:56 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > > I argue for leaving it as is. We indeed have had this discussion > > before, > > and the conclusion was that since there are lots of ways to use X11 > >

Re: [Fink-devel] Who should Provide X11 ?

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Many (most) packages that need to run under X11 have a dependency on > the virtual package x11. This is not enough to make them work. > > The x11 virtual package is provided by the xfree86-base package. The > problem with this is that when xfree86 is

[Fink-devel] Re: Fwd: [Fink-beginners] Gramps installation question (pil broken)

Ben: OK, I've uploaded a new pil package (1.1.4-1). pil does not support tk 8.4, so I had to patch it. This will need some testing to see if I broke anything. -Jeff On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Ben Hines wrote: > I think this is the problem with gramps, pil doesnt actually build: > > gcc -DNDEBUG -

  1   2   >