It's not a bug it's a feature! The carrier operates in the same frame of
reference as aircraft - it has to otherwise you couldn't catch wires
correctly. Unfortunately, the sea surface does not - elsewhere on the sea
surface you will see the carrier up to the sponsons in water. If you don't
crash in
Maik Justus wrote
> Sent: 19 May 2007 10:34
>
> if you look into the forum or read the IRC and even the mailing list,
> you get aware, that many new users are not able to start the
> multiplayer
> option, due to a missing --enable-ai-models option. And probably much
> more potential players f
Hi,
Just a reminder that an improved weather radar is available at:
ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/
In addition to the existing weather radar functions, this improved
instrument uses the Radar Equation to display raw radar contacts, corrected
for RCS and the radar horizon, as we
Martin Spott wrote
>
> Sent: 04 June 2007 23:07
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flying at/for LinuxTag
>
>
> Matthias Boerner wrote:
>
> > I myself was only responsible for organizing ( as
> installing,...) the
> > SUN workstations and the monitor
AJ wrote
> Sent: 06 June 2007 12:58
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Demo vs. AITraffic at KSFO
>
>
> On Wednesday 06 June 2007 06:49, Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Keeping the upcoming release in mind, Innis Cunningham just
> attended
> > me to the fact th
Hi,
Tim Moore has been hard at work recently (with the smallest of inputs by
me), and has ported the improved weather radar already available for plib to
OSG.
The patches are here:
ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/osg/
And a reminder of the improvements available: raw radar conta
Durk wrote
> Sent: 13 June 2007 19:25
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] C++ code beautifier / Coding
> standardsproposal
>
>
> On Saturday 09 June 2007 17:07, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Durk Talsma -- Saturday 09 June 2007:
> > > I've attached the config
Martin
> Behalf Of Spott
> Sent: 13 June 2007 23:58
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] C++ code beautifier / Coding
>
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> > Lesson for the future. Understand what code does, tes
Alexis
>
> Csaba Halász a écrit :
>
> > Looks like tacan is the magic word to make Vivian mad ;)
>
> Don't worry, Csaba, TACAN works again now...
Whoa. I'm sorry I was out last night and haven't had a chance to properly
test that nice little patch (although I see that it has been committed to
Csaba Halász
> Sent: 14 June 2007 04:28
>
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] C++ code beautifier / Coding
>
>
> On 6/14/07, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> >
> > > Lesson for the future. Understand wha
Durk
>
> Sent: 14 June 2007 06:57
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx
>
>
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:12, alexis bory wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TACAN has to search the new AI submode 'tanker'.
> >
> > This tiny patch can
Durk
> Sent: 14 June 2007 12:57
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx
>
>
> Hi Vivian,
>
> On Thursday 14 June 2007 13:39, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > Durk
> >
> > > Sent: 14 Ju
I wrote
> Sent: 13 June 2007 16:54
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Tim Moore has been hard at work recently (with the smallest
> of inputs by me), and has ported the improved weather radar
> already avail
John
> Sent: 15 June 2007 16:26
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> >embryo plans for adding ground echoes. We have yet to port
> 3D clouds to
> >osg,
Melchior
> Sent: 17 June 2007 18:39
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Friday 15 June 2007:
> > > ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/osg/
>
> &
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
> >
> >
> > * Vivian Meazza -- Friday 15 June 2007:
> > > > ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/osg/
> >
> > > We now have the improved weather radar code available for plib and
John
> Sent: 18 June 2007 10:41
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Instrument-altimeter unable
> to indicate altitude above 61831 feet
>
>
> On 06/18/2007 04:06 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
>
snip
>
> 4) By the way, did you ever wonder what "osi" means, in
Melchior FRANZ wrote
>
> * Oliver Schroeder -- Tuesday 19 June 2007:
> > attached is a patch for the osg-branch,
> > which will introduce a new pseudo FDM for ground vehicles
> and (large)
> > ships. The FDM isn't perfect, but good enough to allow driving
> > vehicles.
>
> I'd very much like to
Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: 19 June 2007 12:23
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Sunday 17 June 2007:
> > That's done - the patches are attached. The are NOT format
Roberto Inzerillo
> Sent: 20 June 2007 10:00
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] new pseudo FDM for vehicles
> (osg branch)
>
>
> Anders Gidenstam ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
> >
> >>> attached is a patch for the osg-branc
Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: 20 June 2007 16:01
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] new pseudo FDM for vehicles
> (osg branch)
>
>
> * Anders Gidenstam -- Tuesday 19 June 2007:
> > It is also fairly easy to make liftless aircraft FDM configs for
> > ground
Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: 20 June 2007 16:35
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Wednesday 20 June 2007:
> > Melchior FRANZ
> > > I don't say that the rad
Melchior FRANZ
> * Vivian Meazza -- Wednesday 20 June 2007:
> > On the one hand, if 3D clouds don't call the destructor, then that
> > should be good enough for od-gauge. On the other hand, would not
> > calling the destructor cause memory not to be released on exit?
> -Original Message-
Syd
> Sent: 22 June 2007 15:43
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:42:16 +0200
> Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&g
Syd
> Sent: 22 June 2007 20:18
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:56:34 +0100
> "Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
Martin
> Sent: 23 June 2007 14:08
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> Vivian,
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> > I will attend to thus once the pa
John Denker
> Sent: 30 June 2007 17:16
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [off list] patch forcontrol
> lockingbyautopilot
>
> Note that there are four stages of sophistication among FG users:
> a) Using the keyboard for primary flight control;
> b) U
Martin Spott wrote
> Sent: 02 July 2007 09:25
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic
>
>
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> > Several people (mostly developers) on IRC have stated that
> they have
> > the traffic manager turned off because
Csaba Halász
> Sent: 01 July 2007 21:12
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> Hello!
>
> Here is a new version of my radar patch.
> *** This is still for OSG only ***
>
> Theoretically the ai.diff & wxradar.diff can b
I wrote
> Sent: 02 July 2007 13:15
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> Csaba Halász
>
> > Sent: 01 July 2007 21:12
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved
Thomas Förster
> Sent: 02 July 2007 13:41
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [ANN] OSG - Improved Weather Radar
>
>
> >
> > No callsigns from the Traffic Manager stuff - did we break that?
>
> Probably not, never seen any... (so, if broken, not with the
>
Martin Spott
> Sent: 02 July 2007 15:42
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic
>
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> > What were we saying about incompletely tested and poorly
> reviewed co
Martin Spott
> Sent: 02 July 2007 16:32
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic
>
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> > Martin Spott
> > > "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
>
> >
Martin Spott
> Sent: 02 July 2007 22:45
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic
>
>
> "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> > Martin Spott
> > > Sent: 02 July 2007 16:32
> > > "Vivian Mea
Durk Talsma
> Sent: 03 July 2007 06:36
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crash in AI traffic
>
>
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:20, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> >
Syd
> Sent: 05 July 2007 01:03
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] ATC "aircraft"
>
>
> Hi all ,
> I'd like to remove my ATC "aircraft" from CVS , thought I'd
> try for some feed back first It's not an aircraft , and
> was only meant to view and tra
Hi all,
I've just done a clean download of CVS-HEAD data and source. It compiles
under MSVC8, but crashes after a few seconds of running. No error messages
that I can see.
The fix is in preferences.xml:
false
false
Yesterday, before Durk's latest upload, FG here was running for abo
Hi all,
Today's cvs seems to have solved thru problem of crashes with
traffic-manager when compiled with MSVC8, at least for short runs. My
testing is incomplete, since I have not been able to test for extended
periods, so the longer term memory leak that has been reported may still be
present.
T
I wrote
> Sent: 06 July 2007 12:56
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Today's CVS
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's cvs seems to have solved thru problem of crashes with
> traffic-manager when compiled with MSVC8, at least for short
> runs. My testing is incomple
Durk Talsma
> Sent: 07 July 2007 08:22
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Today's CVS
>
>
> Hi Vivian,
>
> On Friday 06 July 2007 23:31, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> >
> > After further testing I can confirm that the di
Hmm - same problem here - I look forward to someone coming up with an answer
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of visa
faq
Sent: 25 July 2007 17:24
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Compile FlightGea
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vivian
Meazza
Sent: 25 July 2007 18:19
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Compile FlightGear linking
errorsXMLLOaderfunction error
Hmm - same problem here - I look forward to someone coming up with an answer
Vivian
-
giving the error that I have mentioned in the previous mail.
Do you mean you were able to fix the problem of XML loader function that
shows up while linking?
I am attaching the simple.cxx program to this email. please let me know if
you have a different one.
thanks.
kumar.
Vivian Meaz
Hans Fugal
> Sent: 26 July 2007 14:57
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Broken Clouds
>
>
> On 7/26/07, Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hans Fugal
>
> > I have never seen or heard of any problem
Hans Fugal
> Sent: 26 July 2007 01:14
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Broken Clouds
>
>
> Textures/Sky/broken.rgba seems to be literally just that,
> broken. Or rather, corrupted. As do scattered, few, and
> cirrus. fg/osg (but not
> plib) frequently crash
Kumar
There is no error that I can see. Compiles and runs here using yesterday's
CVS HEAD. Can you confirm that you have added XMLLoader.cxx and
XMLLoader.hxx to your project file?
Vivian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of visa
faq
Sen
t its
failing when linking.
I have updated the folder but still get the same error messages as I did
yesterday (posted earlier).
Your suggestions are highly appreciated.
BTW, I am compiling using 2005 VC++.
Kumar.
Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kumar
There is no error tha
Holger Wirtz
> Sent: 28 July 2007 20:36
> To: Flightgear Developers List
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] [OT] CVS checkout of OpenProducer?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know what's up with the CVS of OpenProducer? I
> tried to checkout for several days but it seems that the
> account data was chan
Geoff Air
> Sent: 06 August 2007 12:47
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC8 link problem - Missing
> function ingnnode.cxx?
>
>
> Hi Durk,
>
> The file src/Airports/gnnode.hxx declares a function -
>
> FGTaxiNode(double, double, int);
>
> Then in p
Hi,
I've just uploaded some updates to the Seahawk to correct the detailing for
the FGA6 variant, and took the opportunity to add drop tanks, and a more
accurate representation of the pilot and the Martin-Baker Mk 2 ejection
seat. This update has been much enhanced by AJ working some magic on
tex
Robert Black
> Sent: 29 August 2007 03:41
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Bug-Report] Stutterer and
> pauses withdynamic-view
>
>
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 18:44, Laurence Vanek wrote:
>
> > also had this problem in general (not with dynamic view).
Stewart Andreason
> Sent: 01 September 2007 15:03
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] The Release
>
>
> Did anybody ever acknowledge, duplicate, or fix the bug I reported in
> Simgear-0.3.11-pre1 on May21?
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/usr/src/SimG
John Wojnaroski
> Behalf Of
> Sent: 01 September 2007 21:47
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Particle Systems
>
>
> I've yet to see a system that IMHO tops what Mark Harris did
> a few years
> ago part of his doctoral thesis.
>
> See http://www.lfstec
Holger Wirtz
> Sent: 03 September 2007 07:11
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Addition of true comms in multiplayer
... Snip ...
> > I'm not sure what the best approach would be, but I am inclined to
> > think it would be somehow talking to an existing
gh.robin
> Sent: 09 September 2007 12:51
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Catalina- Water and Solid ground.
>
>
> On dim 9 septembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't know whether you can see the screenshots in my
> German FG Forum
> > pos
Robin van Steenbergen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Sent: 21 September 2007 04:03
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Serious simmer
>
>
> Ampere K. Hardraade schreef:
> > I have seen f
Melchior FRANZ wrote
> Sent: 22 September 2007 16:03
>
> * Durk Talsma -- 9/19/2007 10:17 PM:
> > Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG
> > version also has many new features which the PLib version doesn't,
>
> The most obvious differences are AFAIK:
>
>fg/plib
Durk Talsma
> Sent: 25 September 2007 07:36
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 0.9.11 release candidate two
>
>
> On Sunday 23 September 2007 13:50, I wrote:
> > Some observations:
> > - Some small pauzes seem to be caused by consecutive calls to the
Hi Durk
> Sent: 25 September 2007 19:57
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 0.9.11 release candidate two
>
>
> Hi Vivian,
>
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007 17:39, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> >
> > Here's a short bur
Hi All,
Just to let you know that AJ and I are hard at work producing a new aircraft
- the Blackburn Buccaneer S2. The external model is essentially complete,
and AJ is underway with the instruments. There is working YASim FDM config,
but Andy promises us some modifications to properly implement t
Syd wrote
> Sent: 04 October 2007 01:39
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] oil platform...
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:29:54 -0700
> Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If you define it to be
> > > carrier
> > > you can define
> > > Object
> > >
Jon
> Sent: 04 October 2007 10:03
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] oil platform...
>
>
> AJ MacLeod wrote:
>
> > If you want to practice landing on platforms, try the
> Cromarty Firth,
> > which is
> > packed with the things and is right next to sever
Syd&Sandy
> Sent: 05 October 2007 01:04
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] oil platform...
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 08:23:26 +0100
> "Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm. I have some diff
David Megginson
> Sent: 12 October 2007 15:11
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Consistent aircraft states
>
>
> On 12/10/2007, dave perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Welcome back. I am the one that made all the changes to
> the Warrior.
> > Starting
Tim Moore
> Sent: 13 October 2007 01:40
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] optimized generic_pylons and
> .osg models
>
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Tim Moore -- Saturday 13 October 2007:
> >> I've added a "feature" to SimGear that substitutes a model with
Durk
> Sent: 23 October 2007 19:21
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/Plib periodic stutter notes
>
>
> Hi Casaba,
>
> On Tuesday 23 October 2007 04:53, Csaba Halász wrote:
> > I am not familiar with the nasal system, so this might be
> comple
Georg Vollnhals
> Sent: 23 October 2007 23:34
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/Plib periodic stutter notes
>
>
> Vivian Meazza schrieb:
> > Not here, I'm afraid. Very good frame rates using the
> Buccanee
Durk
> Sent: 24 October 2007 07:22
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/Plib periodic stutter notes
>
>
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 00:15, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
> >
> > Not here, I'm afraid. Very good
even I
> decrease the count of objects.
>
> It would be good if Vivian could send his choosen
> settings for comparing.
>
> HHS
> --- Georg Vollnhals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > Vivian Meazza schrieb:
> > > Not here, I'm afraid. Very
> Sent: 25 October 2007 14:10
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/Plib periodic stutter notes
>
>
> * Torsten Dreyer -- Thursday 25 October 2007:
> > To make things easier for developers, can we think of a
> plug-in system
> > for callback
Heiko Schulz
> Sent: 25 October 2007 19:21
> To: FGFS Developers Mail List
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Unknown failure while
> Initializing subsystems onwin32 and Fedora 7 x86_64
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Me, Aeortro and maybe some ohthers noticed a problem
> with fgfs.
> With the builts from 10/24/
Durk,
> Sent: 26 October 2007 07:18
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Unknown failure while
> Initializingsubsystems on win32 and Fedora 7 x86_64
>
>
> On Thursday 25 October 2007 21:39, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Durk Talsma -- Thursday 25 October 2007
Heiko
> Sent: 25 October 2007 23:01
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Unknown failure while
> Initializingsubsystems onwin32 and Fedora 7 x86_64
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure but I'm think the problem is maybe in
> WinCVS. Today I noticed that the CH47 was
Syd&Sandy
> Sent: 27 October 2007 01:08
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] frame rates...
>
>
> With a pending PLIB release come up
> Would now be a good to push for setting (again) ...
>
>
> 30
>
>
> as default in the preference file ?
>
>
David
> Sent: 03 November 2007 02:25
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing head lag
>
>
> I think it's great that FlightGear added head lag to the sim
> -- it's a good alternative when the pilot can't feel forces
> -- but I think we'd do better to model i
David
> Sent: 03 November 2007 15:58
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing head lag
>
>
> On 03/11/2007, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I should do something similar for planes. Of course, this is still
> > configurable per aircraft,
David
> Sent: 03 November 2007 19:19
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fixing head lag
>
>
> On 03/11/2007, Vivian Meazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As I said before, but perhaps you didn't notice, we already
Roberto
> Sent: 04 November 2007 09:55
>
> Hi,
> I've been modeling for fgfs a few objects around the world.
> I'm used to
> output everything as .AC files since it looks to me it's the
> most used
> format in FGFS but that has a few limitations that I'd like
> not having.
>
> The one I'm
Hi,
I've just added a fuel dump facility to the Buccaneer. A screenshot is here:
ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/Screen-shots/bucc-fuel-jettison.jpg
Looks nice? Don't be fooled: the particles are firmly tied to the aircraft.
There is much work to be done to integrate particles into FG. Not least
Sergey
> Sent: 05 November 2007 15:38
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] compilation problems with MSVC 2005
>
>
> Hello Georgi,
>
> you might want to replace your version of plib with that on
> my site in archive
>
> http://www.sim-ai.org/FlightGear0.9.
Melchior wrote
> Sent: 07 November 2007 23:14
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] view handling news
>
>
> Since David complained about the damping mechanism in
> viewer.cxx, I wanted to check whether the same feature could
> also be done in Nasal. (Damp
I wrote:
> Sent: 08 November 2007 08:16
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] view handling news
>
>
> Melchior wrote
>
>
> > Sent: 07 November 2007 23:14
> > To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] view handling news
>
Melchior
> Sent: 08 November 2007 11:48
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] view handling news
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Thursday 08 November 2007:
> > The model-view with multiplayer has been tested here and works very
> >
Gerard robin wrote
> Sent: 10 November 2007 09:29
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor keyboard reassignment
>
>
> On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > > L is used to engage in the aircraf
Melchior FRANZ
> Sent: 10 November 2007 10:00
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor keyboard reassignment
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
> > Gerard robin wrote
> > > There is only a the little n
gerard robin
> Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
> data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
>
>
> On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> > On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
Hi,
Tonight we carried out our first ride in the backseat of a Buccaneer over
MP, thanks to some excellent recent work by Melchior and Anders. AJ was the
intrepid Observer/passenger, and reported himself well pleased with the
experience.
To try it you need the Pilot and Observer on MP in the Buc
I wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivian Meazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 November 2007 23:20
> To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
> Subject: [ANN] - Buccaneer - Back seat ride
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Tonight we carried out our firs
gerard robin
> Sent: 11 November 2007 13:18
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
> data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
>
>
> On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > gerard robin
> >
> >
AJ MacLeod wrote
> Sent: 12 November 2007 12:09
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Keyboard reorg
>
>
> On Monday 12 November 2007 06:31:26 John Denker wrote:
> > Agreed! I've thought for ages that a top-to-bottom reorg would be
> > helpful. The starting
John Wojnaroski
> Sent: 18 November 2007 16:15
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Default glider model
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Running OSG-2.2 and FG cvs...
>
> After turning off all the models, panels, views, etc, I'm
> left with the
> default yellow-green glider mo
Melchior
> Sent: 19 November 2007 21:55
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS:
> data/Aircraft/Buccaneerbuccaneer-obs-set.xml, 1.2, 1.3
> buccaneer-set.xml, 1.23, 1.24
>
>
> * Vivian Meazza -- Monday 19 November 2007:
>
Stuart
> Sent: 21 November 2007 10:11
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nimitz operation menu items
>
>
> > Bohnert Paul wrote
> >I propose adding two items to the ATC/AI Options menu.
>
>
> >
> >The first one will enable users to set the speed of carrie
Stuart wrote
> Sent: 28 November 2007 10:18
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Keyboard reorg
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've added the key assignments currently defined in
> keyboard.xml to the wiki page, so that we can easily see what
> assignments people think
Hi Paul,
I'm afraid I cannot add the items you ask for as they stand. The code only
works with the existing Nimitz_demo.xml. If any other carrier demo is used,
this carrier will be placed in the default Nimitz location by the use of
this dialog. A dialog must be generally applicable, not apply to
LeeE wrote
> Sent: 30 November 2007 00:13
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol
> 19, Issue 25
>
>
> On Thursday 29 November 2007 21:55, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > * BARANGER Emmanuel -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
> >
I think that the juxtaposition of 9.11 and "Flight Simulator" would be
unfortunate, to say the least. I'm not sure how strongly I feel about that
personally, but I recognise that there are those, particularly the other
side of the pond, who do or might. Why give gratuitous and unnecessary
offence?
Maik
> Sent: 02 December 2007 13:49
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: Control surface position damping
>
>
> Hi Roy,
> Roy Vegard Ovesen schrieb am 02.12.2007 14:13:
> > When prssing the 5 key on the numeric keypad to reset the
> controls to
> > ze
Stuart wrote:
>
> Sent: 04 December 2007 22:16
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear prerelease
>
>
>
> --- Durk Talsma wrote:
> > Another question: we always have a limited number of
> aircraft that are
> > in the distribution, with the rest bei
Tim Moore
>
> Sent: 04 December 2007 23:01
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] patch to use OpenSceneGraph database pager
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
> http://www.bricoworks.com/moore/0001-OSG-pager-megapatch.patch
> is a
701 - 800 of 1027 matches
Mail list logo
