Roger,
I am always stunned by your ability to mine the web for wonderful stuff.
I happen to have the Peirce paper sitting on my table, so let me draw his
argument out a bit further. Piece describes 4 ways of fixing belief . This
one he calls authority. The two others he disapproves of
Here we go again, indeed.
Blind faith is a redundancy, right? All faith is blind. We do not have
faith in what we doubt. As Peirce would say: Doubt is not a guest. We do
not entertain it. When it moves in, it sleeps in our bed, eats at our
table, goes to work with us, and listens to
If your conversations go on past the first of October, I would love to join
you. N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Victoria Hughes
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 2:42 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re:
fairly and well conducted, we reach a point where we
have to appeal to a proposition we cannot justify.
In haste,
Nick,
Nicholas Thompson wrote at 09/14/2012 11:31 AM:
But the problem here is not faith, itself, which always lies somewhere
down there amongst the turtles, but the rapidity
.
But thank you for once again taking such an interest in my own particular
world view!
--Doug
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Here we go again, indeed.
Blind faith is a redundancy, right? All faith is blind. We do not have
faith
Ok, owen. Let's say I put on a bomb vest, put my FRIAM T-shirt on over it,
and blew myself up and 30 soldiers at the military base where that poor
schmuk Bradley Manning is being held. Let's say, I leave an email circular
claiming that I did it in the name of a Free Internet. The reporter
Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: America and the Middle East: Murder in Libya | The
Economist
Nicholas Thompson wrote at 09/14/2012 12:18 PM:
gepr wrote:
It always surprises me the extent to which people (yes! people in
general) over-simplify complex things. One of my pet peeves
I dunno. It's not a bad speech
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/07/remarks-president-dem
ocratic-national-convention . Have you read it? N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:25
in Libya | The
Economist
Ok, I'll bite.
Why?
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Doesn't the same apply to the drinking of wine?
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Thursday
and the Middle East: Murder in Libya | The
Economist
So, wine is the root cause of all our problems? I think not. I can handle
my wine as well as I can handle my religion.
Better, even, given that my religion handling needs are nil.
On Sep 13, 2012 10:06 PM, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp
] PRES12_WTA Prospectus - The University of Iowa
Well, Nick. A google search on Big Dig Corruption returned the following:
About 911,000 results (0.18 seconds)
Take a few minutes to educate yourself on this particular topic.
--Doug
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp
Eric,
I am no friend of Romney, but, whatever else you might say about the big dig,
it rescued Boston from the utter destruction imposed by the central artery
project, reconnecting historic sites in the city, and reintegrating the city in
many ways. I have only been back to the city a few
Eric,
I have not read the original article, but still your comments caught my
attention.
As argued in this article http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/9.html , the
disassociation of predictive and explanatory power seems misguided. I suppose
a statistical function of many
Thanks, everybody.
I realize that most of you have day jobs and don't have time to be teachers
in my self-designed Elder-Hostel Education program, but if you do have a
moment, could you answer the following questions?
In these questions, the words cool and warm will have a technical
, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
So, somebody asked me, in my role as a weather nerd, how come the nitrogen
in the atmosphere doesnt all fall to the bottom on still nights and
suffocate us all. I asked the question of
stupid-answers-to-stupid-questions-asked-by-stupid-people.com
12, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
So, somebody asked me, in my role as a weather nerd, how come the nitrogen
in the atmosphere doesnt all fall to the bottom on still nights and
suffocate us all. I asked the question of
stupid-answers-to-stupid-questions
ProfDave,
Ask your guest about Hesse's theory of metaphor in scientific explanation.
Also, about Peirce. And then take good notes. I wish I could be there.
By the way, Everybody on this list should know not to bet against Dave West
on any matter relating to Wisconsin Politics.
[sigh]
I am struggling with my new MIFI box from Verizon and I am wondering if
there is a standard download/upload task I can give it to see if I am
actually getting faster service than through dial up. It feels AWFULLY slow
right now. I am in the mosquito infested bog in massashusetts about 3
miles
Steve,
I am sorry I cannot be there. I am in the bog. Santa Fe should be grateful
for what you-all have accomplished in this time. I look forward to your
next re-incarnation, whatever it might be.
Hugs all around,
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
I found the article horrifying. Is anybody old enough to remember a sixties
research project with a cute name which centered around a long running debate
concerning whether setting off an abomb in the upper atmosphere would
obliterate the vanallen belts, destroy the ozone layer, or just set
Bruce,
I think you conceded too much in this message.
In the previous message you wrote
eventually Einstein found a deep 'explanation' for gravity
in terms of the effects that matter has on space itself
But grant writes:
Did he not theorize that gravity is a force that
Thanks Bruce
This obviously will require careful study. I will try to respond when I get
to the Other Side and have had a few days to get used to living in The Bog.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Bruce Sherwood
John, I haven't yet digested Bruce's comments above, nor entirely what you
have written here, but I want to clarify one point.
When somebody speaks of space being warped one has in mind one of those
diagrams where the Cartesian coordinates are bent, right? In other words,
we are using our
Didn't Newton feel that it was a bit magical? I need to be instructed,
here.
N
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of John Kennison
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:11 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
So, what did Newton mean when he said I make no hypotheses.
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Russ Abbott
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 1:39 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Unsolved Problems in
Well, in my psychology, the answer to such a question takes the form of,
what is the larger pattern of which my dumb stuff is a part?
N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Gillian Densmore
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 6:09 PM
To: The Friday Morning
, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Well, in my psychology, the answer to such a question takes the form of,
what is the larger pattern of which my dumb stuff is a part?
N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Gillian Densmore
Sent: Friday
Well, On Peirce’s account (yes I am still reading Peirce) Truth (or “solved”)
is like “settled law”. It could come undone any time, but usually doesn’t.
(Actually, I have that wrong. Truth is what wouldn’t come undone, but, of
course, we never live to be sure that that’s what we got.
Hi, Carl,
Been thinking about this “tech problem” – “science problem” distinction.
Can Eric tell the difference? Can I tell the difference? Can Carl tell the
difference? Is engineering the same as science? Is control the same as
understanding? Jochem: Is it time for me to go back
what
psychological theories have been disproven?
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Thompson [nickthomp...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:18 AM
To: c...@plektyx.com; 'The Friday Morning Applied
you still can't remember by
name correctly ;-)
Jochen
Sent from Android
Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi, Carl,
Been thinking about this “tech problem” – “science problem” distinction.
Can Eric tell the difference? Can I tell the difference? Can Carl
Russ,
This is, of course, the pragmatic[ist] understanding of solved.
Everybody has quit looking for a better solution.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Russ Abbott
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:20 PM
To: The Friday Morning
Doug,
I think it's a form of play. Possibly a form that is not your cup of tea.
Intellectual play and science are alike, in my world, because both explore
contradictions in our ways of thinking of things. Oxymorons, like
psychological science or thinking machine or conscious animal.
Omigosh! The month-long exile is over! And I only broke it once.
I can actually live a whole month without mouthing off in an annoying way on
FRIAM.
Trouble is, now I can't remember what I think about anything. My basic
position is that progress in psychology has been stymied by the allure
Hi, Robert,
I find the local medical situation terrifying. My daughter had to be
admitted to St. V. for an emergency a couple of X-masses ago, and I swear to
god there were blood splatters on the wall behind her bed in her room. I
am fighting allergies so bad right now they are preventing
through electronic
medical records, you can smile. Wryly.
On Apr 23, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Hi, Robert,
I find the local medical situation terrifying. My daughter had to be
admitted to St. V. for an emergency a couple of X-masses ago, and I swear to
god
Offline
I just stumbled on this message that was never answered. It was in RED so I
figured I better answer it. See below.
In fact, many warrior groups kidnap the women AND children from other
groups. Or even take the men as slaves. This would seem to be stupid from
in inclusive
of induction and all the intricacies involving the
philosophy of induction as a thought process does not meet requirement
number 1, above.
--Doug
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi doug, and Bruce
I realize that the following
of induction and all the intricacies involving the
philosophy of induction as a thought process does not meet requirement
number 1, above.
--Doug
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi doug, and Bruce
I realize that the following was hundreds
to the wall about,
either to say that it is correct, OR that it is a correct understanding of
Peirce.
Have to bail on this for a few days.
Best,
Nick
From: Russ Abbott [mailto:russ.abb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 2:06 PM
To: Nicholas Thompson
Cc: The Friday Morning
Hi, everybody,
Somebody (whom I respect greatly) has eldered me, writing to say that I am
in danger of driving everybody nuts with my new found interest in the logic
of scientific inquiry. So I will give it a rest, and lurk for a month. If
anybody wants to talk off line about any of the
/
_
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi doug, and Bruce
I realize that the following was hundreds of words deep in a verbose email
message, and so it is understandable that you did not respond, but I am
curious about your
:05 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Dear Doug,
Thanks, Doug. No offence taken, but . none of this is a game to me.
Thinking about stuff, getting to the bottom of what I and others are
thinking, is everything for me. It's way up the hierarchy from sex and food.
We have
or free
will. I just need to focus on my grand design and its purpose.
Sarbajit
On 4/6/12, Nicholas Thompson mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Dear Bruce,
You wrote
Uh, does there have to be a reason? I'm interested just because I am
-- a portion
AM:
Turn off Javascript,.disable Java.
In Firefox, Tools Options Content
On 4/4/12, Nicholas Thompson mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
So. In short. Has everybody BUT me gone to some toggle in Google
and in Firefox and in I.E. and done something
I go back to the original question I asked Owen. Why are these fantasies
INTERESTING?. Now, quickly, I have to admit, they don't capture my
imagination that well. But I also have to admit that I firmly believe that
NOBODY is interested in anything for nothing. IE, wherever there is an
interest
of science. There
are many variants of philistinism, and of engagement.
Bruce
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
I go back to the original question I asked Owen. Why are these fantasies
INTERESTING?. Now, quickly, I have to admit, they don't
the meaning of
INTERESTING is too.
Robert C
On 4/4/12 2:55 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
I go back to the original question I asked Owen. Why are these fantasies
INTERESTING?. Now, quickly, I have to admit, they don't capture my
imagination that well. But I also have to admit that I firmly believe
Hi, everybody,
Did you see this odd, avuncular op-ed from the Federal Trade Commission?
I don't know whether it reassured me more than it scared the living bejeesus
out of me. Big-Brother's Big Brother is looking out for you.
I take it back about contempt: If one of you would
Peggy,
I think, as your whole presentation implies, which you are doing depends on
whether you are using theory to create expectations of fact, or using facts
to build a theory. You probably are doing both. Does this help?
This is the way I think about it, for good or ill.
In
Ok, so this is the second explanation we have had offered of why we haven't
heard from anybody. We're the first.
Indeed, has anybody got anything to say about this possibility.
N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent:
I don't remember anybody complaining about discussions of religion, per se.
I do remember a request that contempt or gratuitous nastiness not be a part
of such a discussion I would also urge everybody to bear in mind that this
is, after all, a list of people loosely self identified as
Oh. Steve. I would infinitely prefer to argue with a catholic about
transubstantiation than with a spiritualist. N
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:10 PM
To: The Friday
that the
civilizations might currently exist and be talking past each other, or
choosing to not converse at all, and you are talking from the standpoint of
whether they might not exist yet.
On 4/1/12 9:31 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
I don't remember anybody complaining about discussions of religion, per
se.
I do
Dear Owen,
I don't know how to ask this question without sounding churlish.
But why is this question INTERESTING? That's not a rhetorical question, It
actually doesn't INTEREST me. The cranky voice inside me wants to say, of
COURSE we are term limited, of course our term of office
about. I bet for example, they are pondering prime numbers as we do. I bet
they have found that chance does not mean no structure .. i.e. random
processes can create highly structured results. Evolution and Us for
example.
-- Owen
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp
I just had a face to face conversation with own who put his interest in the
second way (see below).
In which case, the thread ought to be entitled, So why haven't we heard
from them?
THAT strikes me as a more interesting question.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
, when one count grows larger than the other, predict
that the other will occur to even things out. Many people think that way.
-- Russ
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Lakkaraju, Kiran
klak...@sandia.govmailto:klak...@sandia.gov wrote:
T
From: Nicholas Thompson
[mailto:nickthomp
, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Dear Eric Smith (and other patient people),
I have been trying to get the chance to lay this out for three days, and have
just not had the time. I am enthralled at the moment by the scientific
philosophy of Charles Saunders Peirce because, weird
Owen,
Eric is basically correct, although I think he may have misread the order of
things (which is easy to do given that one HAS to read threads backwards. My
caving in and just stating my position came very late in the game and was a
response in part to all the confusion created by my
This is a great idea. But ONLY if we think of it as a remedy, not as a
remediation. I would always argue for the minimalification of latinate
suffixes.
But it really is a great idea.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On
Dear Doug,
I am afraid that the black hole example is already too technologically dense
for me, so I am going to punt on the project of luring you inside my walls
and slaughtering you there, and just out-right tell you what I think
.
The argument began with my detecting in you (perhaps
any redundancy. Bugger the OED.
It's full of latinate obfuscation.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: lrudo...@meganet.net [mailto:lrudo...@meganet.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:08 AM
To: Nicholas Thompson; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM
other fairly immutable
quality -- the accuracy of my bullshit detector.
--Doug
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Dear Doug,
I am afraid that the black hole example is already too technologically dense
for me, so I am going to punt
-farm.net
wrote:
Very clever.
--Doug
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Doug wrote
In retrospect, I suppose I do have faith in one other fairly immutable
quality -- the accuracy of my bullshit detector
Well, why not. its always
or by working with examples so staightfoward and free of technical
detail that the context is obvious to all participants without a whole lot
of explication .
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of glen e. p. ropella
Robert,
I think that's the best I've ever seen.
Thanks,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:14 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re:
So, Doug, explain to me how you come to believe in the validity of
induction?
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:43 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Just
effectively in 100 words or less.
BTW - I do agree with Deutsch that conjecture and refutation is a superior
way of gaining knowledge, than what I would call induction. But it seems
that to say induction doesn't exist or doesn't work is going too far.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:42:15PM -0600, Nicholas
to the Child.
If my recollection is correct, then this leads us to the 4th point Godhood
of Father
Sarbajit
On 3/17/12, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks, Sarbajit,
One quibble:
a child is the genetic sum of its parents
If we are talking genetic tokens (as opposed
Bad as things are, now, I fear that a third party, by any name, would
further divide the non crazy vote.
N
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 10:02 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
it and it does not, so far as I can see, appear
in the FRIAM archive.
So, here it is again, in case anyone else missed it.
From: Nicholas Thompson [mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject
, appear in the
FRIAM archive.
So, here it is again, in case anyone else missed it.
From: Nicholas Thompson [mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: RE: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Thanks
The recent interview with E.O. Wilson in the New Yorker pissed me off so bad
I had to write them a letter. Since the letter won't be published, I am
tempted to inflict it on all of you.
Thanks for your patience,
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and
/
_
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
The recent interview with E.O. Wilson in the New Yorker pissed me off so bad
I had to write them a letter. Since the letter won't be published, I am
tempted to inflict it on all of you
the PDF of
the article that pissed you off? Otherwise those of us who don't have a
subscription to the New Yorker won't really understand what you are writing
about.
-R
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
The recent interview with E.O. Wilson
Robert, 'n all,
Here is an electronic version of the E.O. Wilson interview that irked me,
courtesy of Frank Wimberly. I get irked by U.S. Mail.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/03/05/120305fa_fact_lehrer
Nick
Hi, everybody,
I live a pretty standard geriatric life, so it's been hard for me to imagine
why anybody should care if Google is tracking. But, finally I was able to
imagine the KIND of reason. Let's say I am working for company X and
thinking of quitting and getting into something new. My
Joe,
I do internet paranoia as good as the next guy, but it occurred to me to
wonder why knowing your address from an ad on ebay would identify the house
as worthy of robbery any more than choosing a house a random.
Am I missing an real chance to feel persecuted? By Google?
Nick
, 2012 at 06:00:58PM -0700, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Russell3,
Other than your time, what are the journal costs? I mean roughly.
What are the categories of cost?
I am having a hard time imagining any.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
Bruce,
Would you be willing to get into the weeds a bit about what those costs are?
My imagination is failing me, here.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Bruce Sherwood
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:48 PM
To:
Wow! Look what just turned up.
http://www.bepress.com/allservices.html
http://www.bepress.com/edikit.html
It must be expensive. The web page is like one of those menus a fancy
French restaurant . no prices. If you have to ask, you really shouldn't
have visited this website.
Anybody
journals / books at 30% (possiby less) of what it would
cost in the USA.without compromising quality.
On 2/15/12, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks, Russ.
Why, exactly, do we need them anyway. Can't any list of a hundred
experts (like FRIAM, for instance) become a peer
at the time, although he did manage to find someone to
process the back log of submission and conference papers they had at the
time. And now, I guess funding has run out, and the journal is on ice :(.
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:39:20PM -0700, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Hi, everybody,
I
and consensus among academics form.
Greg Sonnenfeld
The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane
to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp
Hi, everybody,
I have signed perhaps a dozen Publishers Agreements over my life time and
each one was more onerous, self-serving, and stupid than the one before. My
favorite was the publisher who asked me to hold the Publisher harmless for
anything that might occur as a consequence of the
/
vita: http://sites.google.com/site/russabbott/
http://sites.google.com/site/russabbott/
_
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi, everybody,
I have signed perhaps a dozen Publishers
.
;-)
Greg Sonnenfeld
The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane
to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Why would anybody pass on a hopeless task
Peter,
I am baffled by your email. And why it was sent to the rapid rewards
program at SW airlines. I was hoping I was going to learn what these
ordinary housewives are doing in their homes, but I never did. Visiting
websites? Nick
-Original Message-
From:
it (or contact Peter in some other way
to tell him the good news)
Sarbajit
On 1/28/12, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Peter,
I am baffled by your email. And why it was sent to the rapid rewards
program at SW airlines. I was hoping I was going to learn what these
ordinary
Didja get the ms?
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
ERIC P. CHARLES
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Owen Densmore
Cc: The; Group; disc...@sfcomplex.org
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] SOPA URLs
Owen,
To shift slightly... Aren't there
Dear everybody,
I have been working at the edges of the occupy/99% movement in Santa Fe,
where we just put together a sizeable demonstration to welcome the governor
and the legislature back to work. We are now trying to figure out which
legislative actions to support and oppose in the short 30
://statcounter.com; is also quite good and you don't get the obvious
feeling that our tiny websites are contributing to Google's bloated revenue
stream.
Sarbajit
On 1/18/12, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Thanks, Grant. I guess I did all that , cuz it's now working. Just
Hi, everybody,
I did a website for our local occupy group, and Now I am curious if anybody
used it. I rummaged around in the helpfiles until I found a third party
instruction set for how to set up analytics for a site, I opened a profile
and pasted the little number into my site, and sat
And then, 15 minutes after I sent this message and 72 hours after it was
supposed to, my first GA report appeard.
So I guess I'm set. As I feared, the report looks like my science citation
index report. I sure do access my own website a lot.
[sigh]
Nick
From: Nicholas Thompson
:47 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
Hi, everybody,
I did a website for our local occupy group, and Now I am curious if anybody
used it. I rummaged around in the helpfiles until I found a third party
instruction set for how to set up analytics for a site, I opened a profile
and pasted the little
But that's the point, Doug! Many of them have!
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 11:23 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: Winds of Change
Owen,
Whom the gods would drive mad.. Etc.
Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 7:22 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: Winds of Change
I
Great Catch, Robert. I am afraid my finger was hovering over the send
button. Gawd I have such naïve fingers. I did wonder, though, about the
pension claim. And also, I am not so keen on term limits, unless lobbyists
also have them. Nick
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com
I guess so: I sent the following message out to FRIAM yesterday but the
Censors seem to have deep-sixed it.
Dear local friammers,
(1)The coffeeshop at St. Johns WILL be open and serving this Friday. I
have checked this and double checked it.
(2)There is a demonstration
401 - 500 of 1323 matches
Mail list logo
