tters in "Application SECurity Api"
Apache Shiro - "castle" in Japanese
Voting ends Wednesday June 10th, Midnight (GMT-8) to allow some time
after
the weekend for additional votes.
Thank you for your vote!
Thanks,
Jason
-----------
--
Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
dhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
Ok, I think we are in general agreement. Are you personally of the
opinion that -sources.jar are not adequate as formal ASF releases?
They are not, they do not need to be, and they would be useless for
the
purpose they s
On 28-Apr-09, at 1:24 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
Not mocking, just clarifying that on the aggregate level what is
distributed
via the standard Apache mechanism easily has its analog source
equivalent
which can be built.
Ok, I
On 27-Apr-09, at 9:25 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
Don't spread FUD like that. You don't have any idea how Maven
releases work
so I'll take a moment and explain it to you.
Dude, chill! Mocking me isn't appreci
com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks
no skin off my back.
That's the extent of my community building skill.
On the OSGi front I probably wouldn't be involved in many discussion
on the Felix list because I use Equinox. So I don't think that's
overly odd.
-> richard
On 4/5/09 2:11 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote
here.
If you guys want to work on something else, seriously, go for. I'd be
happy to share use cases as we've dealt with 5 all the way up to 3k
machines.
On 5-Apr-09, at 6:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
As I said in the previ
mpensated for with a little effort.
Competition is fine, I would just be more open about that aspect of
it in
the proposal.
On 5-Apr-09, at 8:47 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
On 5-Apr-09, at 2:46 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello Jason,
On
is fine, I would just be more open about that aspect of it
in the proposal.
On 5-Apr-09, at 8:47 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
On 5-Apr-09, at 2:46 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello Jason,
On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:09 , Jason van Zyl wrote:
Eq
On 5-Apr-09, at 2:46 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello Jason,
On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:09 , Jason van Zyl wrote:
Equinox p2 was designed to replace the aging Update Manager in
Eclipse. It focusses on installing Eclipse-based applications from
scratch and updating them and can be extended to
ameworks
>>>
I think the incomplete work of OBR which has good ideas and the
massive amount of practical work in p2 can be combined to make a
better system.
On 4-Apr-09, at 7:47 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 4/4/09 7:09 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 4-Apr-09, at 12:30 PM, Marcel Of
olid base and be improved and adapted to support things like OBR or
anything else including non-OSGi systems.
Greetings, Marcel
-------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@
rg
Thanks,
Jason
--------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
--
You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
No one is fanatically s
l: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
We know wh
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
--------
On 17-Dec-08, at 6:26 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
I've never tried hooking up agents to more then one master, but if
that
works sure.
Oh, that was not really my question. I was wondering if we could
install separate agents
On 17-Dec-08, at 2:28 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Jason van Zyl
wrote:
We're still trying to figure out how the machine is being utilized
but we
can offer up some space for Apache projects that are interested
using the
grid Sonatype has setup for
OSX.
--
James
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at s
porting schedule, remove project
from active project list on site, add to stopped/failed project list.
Close down wiki, update project site to reflect status.
Martijn
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:27 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Do we have an official process for dissolving a proj
On 13-Nov-08, at 2:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Jason Van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the
incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4
IPMC
members vo
documentation?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely
?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be
?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be
itting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype d
anization. What we are deciding is beyond the realm of Apache.
On 7-Oct-08, at 11:23 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
The central repository is the Maven PMC's business. What results
will be public policy but we'd like to avoid the banter of the
misinformed so we can arriv
On 7-Oct-08, at 12:02 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The central repository is the Maven PMC's business. What results
will be
public policy but we'd like to avoid the banter of the misinformed
so we
The central repository is the Maven PMC's business. What results will
be public policy but we'd like to avoid the banter of the misinformed
so we can arrive at a decision quickly.
On 6-Oct-08, at 10:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
The discussions are takin
dditional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
Our achievements speak for themselves. What we have to keep track
of are
The discussions are taking place on the Maven PMC list. If you are a
member you can join the list.
On 4-Oct-08, at 8:31 AM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
2008/10/3 Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2-Oct-08, at 9:19 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Better a bad de
On 3-Oct-08, at 12:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We don't need for you to implement any "policy" other than the
requirement for users to approve authorized signing keys. You
simply need to implement artifact signing and mandator
On 3-Oct-08, at 10:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Moved to the thread it belongs in ...
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Better a bad decision than no decision, otherwise, soon, nobody
will
vote anymore...
Not really. Consider that there appears to be
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A man enjoys his work when he understand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
--------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A man enjoys his work when he
.
-- dims
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 27-Sep-08, at 7:46 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jason,
Exactly why in previous discussions i already asked..."Can the maven
folks provide another way to do this?" (not showing disclaimers
x27;ll hope that people rely on the same tool that keeps them from
sniffing the ends of loaded shotguns, or bathing with toasters. That
would be the brain.
-- dims
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 27-Sep-08, at 7:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas w
m
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jaso
ind anyone who isn't impressed with them.
The central repository is in very good hands.
thanks,
dims
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
maven repository
- Maven TLP (now that ASF has absorbed Maven server)
The
On 27-Sep-08, at 6:13 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
maven repository
- Maven TLP (now that ASF has absorbed Maven server)
The ASF has not absorbed the Maven server.
Color me confused for having approved colocation expenses some
2 meetings back. This did not
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
Script timed out
--
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
is responsible for the quality of the
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
A man enjoys his work when he understands the whole and when he
is responsible for the quality of the whole
-- Christ
I think.
Thanks,
Jason
--------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good people
can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't save
D]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
What matters is not ideas, but the people who have them. Good people
can
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
happiness is like a butterfly: the more you chase it, the more it will
elude you, but if you turn your attention to other things, it will come
and sit softly on your sho
r/ThriftProposal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
--------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at
On 23 Dec 07, at 10:29 AM 23 Dec 07, Peter Neubauer wrote:
Hi there,
On Oct 31, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have the port to Plexus in a tree and I'm sure alag would be fine
with it coming along here.
Yes, i got that impression too. Guess Alag has no cycles to spare on
-----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BeanShell (which is not an Apache project) or should it be
"BSF" (which is Apache)?
Or perhaps something else entirely?
S
On 22/10/2007, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The proposal for Composer has been drafted here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposa
On 23 Oct 07, at 5:46 AM 23 Oct 07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 22 Oct 07, at 10:36 AM 22 Oct 07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the
o try. I think we'll be out of the incubator
very quickly relative to projects coming in with little or no open
source experience.
On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The proposal for Composer has been drafted here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal
As m
On 22 Oct 07, at 10:36 AM 22 Oct 07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the
participants are already familiar with projects here.
But not all favorably it appears...
I don't think anyon
already
familiar with projects here.
[ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype do
/fotap.org/~osi
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
coming up, as people become
interested
in using Maven for other languages.
Shane
On 5/15/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 May 07, at 9:13 PM 6 May 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> I didn't have a chance to talk about this with Shane but the
idea in
> the end
've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
-------------
To unsubscribe, e-
ECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
AIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC
On 6 May 07, at 4:57 AM 6 May 07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
incubator distributions need to be stored under /www/www.apache.org/
dist
AFACT there are two reasonable options: either create repositories
under /www.apache.org/dist/incubator or use the standard maven ones
of course, staging f
On 15 Mar 07, at 9:23 PM 15 Mar 07, Henri Yandell wrote:
Two parts to the vote:
ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus
mirrors).
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
+1
TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
-1
Vote to last a week. Unless peopl
On 22 Feb 07, at 1:23 PM 22 Feb 07, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Trustin Lee wrote:
I agree with the idea on extending a parent POM generally, but
org.apache:apache-incubator might be more reasonable for the projects
under incubation.
I agree. Having an Incubator POM that includes the necessary
+1
On 12 Jan 07, at 11:19 AM 12 Jan 07, Yonik Seeley wrote:
The Solr community has voted and believes Solr is ready for graduation
from the Incubator and has met all incubation requirements, and the
Lucene PMC has voted to accept Solr.
The Solr podling is therefore requesting to graduate from
+1
On 8 Jan 07, at 8:20 PM 8 Jan 07, Brian McCallister wrote:
ActiveMQ would like to move to graduate to a top level project, and
that the proposal at the end of this email be presented to the
board for consideration at the next meeting.
Status File: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ac
The artifacts have been removed from the central repository.
Jason.
On 22 Nov 06, at 6:54 AM 22 Nov 06, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Unknown to the woden-dev team (until today) our M6 release artifacts
have escaped to ibiblio (see this thread on woden-dev):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws
ed in noun form as a gerund... ;)
-Stephen
On 11/15/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12 Nov 06, at 6:17 PM 12 Nov 06, Henri Yandell wrote:
> incubating appears to be the more common - let's make incubating
> our standard.
>
As a qualifier a noun should be
On 12 Nov 06, at 6:17 PM 12 Nov 06, Henri Yandell wrote:
incubating appears to be the more common - let's make incubating
our standard.
As a qualifier a noun should be used like alpha, beta, milestone. No
one generally uses verbs in a version like incubating. Also because
it's just the
+1
On 23 Oct 06, at 2:03 PM 23 Oct 06, Xavier Hanin wrote:
Hi All,
After several weeks of discussion with our user community [1] and with
several Apache members, I am proud to present a proposal [2] for
the open
source project Ivy to join the Apache Incubator.
I and all the Ivy team and us
+1
On 12 Oct 06, at 11:42 AM 12 Oct 06, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
--
The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the
initial
committers. The Champion sh
On 8 Oct 06, at 8:55 AM 8 Oct 06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in that case I would really like to see it that
if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
and have a sincere interest in helping, that they be
included in the
On 6 Oct 06, at 9:38 AM 6 Oct 06, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 10/6/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the Proposer controls the Proposal (and not stick it on a
freely editable
Wiki), then isn't it very straight forward?
+1, although I think a Wiki still *should* work if the estab
On 1 Oct 06, at 6:38 PM 1 Oct 06, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 1, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Taken from the "Problem with commit rights on Celtixfire" thread:
- The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC
- The PPMC (Mentors) elects additional PPMC members
On 1 Oct 06, at 1:05 PM 1 Oct 06, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
- The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC
- The PPMC (Mentors) elects additional PPMC members
- The PPMC elects Committers
+1
--- Noel
-
On 28 Sep 06, at 12:59 PM 28 Sep 06, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Well, PMCs are formed by the board when a project moves to top level
status. PPMCs are formed for an incubating project, and exactly how
that works tends to differ a bit between projects. Some mentors start
off with just the mentors
at I signed up for at Apache, but I feel
that if
they make such an important decision as this they should at least
communicate the above.
setting aside the particulars, this worries me from a process
perspective.
I will again defer to Jason van Zyl who was the prime
focus of all this. Unl
tp://hiramchirino.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
n putting snapshots in the incubator snapshot
repository.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jaso
On 9 Sep 06, at 5:48 PM 9 Sep 06, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 9, 2006, at 5:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 8 Sep 06, at 10:36 PM 8 Sep 06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 9/8/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This artifact would need to released by the Incubator PMC so
that it
.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/trunk/maven/pom.xml
.
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
using the release plugin to tag/publish
it?
Yup :-)
Thanks
--
Jeremy
On Sep 3, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Sep 06, at 1:03 PM 1 Sep 06, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Any other thoughts on this? Any objection to checking it in to
incubator SVN?
I think it's a good idea becaus
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
? A majority wins?
-- dims
On 8/30/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30 Aug 06, at 11:18 PM 30 Aug 06, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Hmm, we are not setting any limits on anyone else, just
ourselves. We
> the incubator folks will not automatically sync *our* repo to the
doesn't really jive with what Justin said in an earlier thread.
In that we should tell people not to redistribute incubator artifacts
and ask they comply out of courtesy.
-- dims
On 8/30/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30 Aug 06, at 10:16 PM 30 Aug 06, Davanum Sri
e
2) Make the Maven developers go search out all third party
integration efforts to prevent them from providing convenient access
to certain repositories
I think this is a little heavy handed, unfair and unnecessary.
-- dims
On 8/30/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3
goal here is user awareness then I think using an version like
(1) supports this end to a great extent while being more convenient
for the average Maven user.
-- dims
On 8/30/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30 Aug 06, at 1:48 PM 30 Aug 06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote
---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 28 Aug 06, at 11:44 AM 28 Aug 06, Leo Simons wrote:
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 12:44:58PM -0400, Jason van Zyl wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be sync'd to
the central repository but I don't really see much point in this. A
few folks with incubatin
On 27 Aug 06, at 10:26 PM 27 Aug 06, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 28 August 2006 08:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Perhaps Maven can help by not allowing the transitive dependency on
incubating projects? Just thinking out loud...
If you can clearly see what you have in a report so I'm not
On 27 Aug 06, at 6:28 PM 27 Aug 06, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 8/27/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be
sync'd to
the central repository but I don't
and as such I don't really see any downside to allowing the
sync to Maven's central repository.
Thoughts?
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Upayavira
* Alex Karasulu
* Sylvain Wallez
== Mentors ==
* Upayavira
* Alex Karasulu
* Sylvain Wallez
* Bertrand Delacretaz
-------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
el of access to help share the load.
Done.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROT
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g off this list?
thanks,
dims
On 8/18/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Aug 06, at 11:30 AM 18 Aug 06, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Yeah, I find this a bit confusing too. The ibiblio repository
> distribution policy is unrelated to Apache's. No one is making any
>
oject create an upload request ?
There's no reason why Apache internal policies would affect such a
request.
AFAIK, Ibiblio repository is not owned by the ASF ...
Jason van Zyl wrote:
+1
On 14 Aug 06, at 5:03 PM 14 Aug 06, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 8/7/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
"If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize" -
Muhammad Ali
-
To
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a
repository@ point of view.
Pinging on this to make sure the Incubator is happy with the idea
before I set it up.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason va
notification system used for
reminding people to send in board reports?
Jason.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED
ubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
