Re: [QUESTION] KIE - NPM package names

Here’s my 2 cents. Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away. For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary convenience packaging? Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 1:13 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0 Release Candidate 2

Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread. Best, Dave > On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing. > > This is our first release

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+0 (binding) wave > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > Francis > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: >> Hi, >> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following >>

Re: Verification of download pages and links

# sha512 is preferred and it will be the last provided. part1 = ".".join(distribHash[podling][-1].split('.')[:-1]) part2 = ".".join(path.split('.')[:-1]

Re: Verification of download pages and links

> On Apr 28, 2024, at 9:58 AM, tison wrote: > > Thank you! > > I found there is no rationale for these links, and thus, it's quite a bit > challenging in memory. > > IIRC the closer.lua script is for selecting the most proper CDN for > source/binary bundles in use. They can, technically,

Re: Assistance Needed: Editing resilientdb.xml on Apache SVN

> On Apr 5, 2024, at 1:01 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > Hey Apratim, > > Those files are stored in a subversion repository, therefore, you will need > to install subversion (svn) to checkout and commit to the repository. > > I can see that you are already a committer on incubator, so your

Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

Hi - > On Apr 3, 2024, at 4:33 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case? How can we > prevent something like this from happening again? Rather than consider what went wrong in this case and to avoid an how is the Incubator broken this time

Re: [VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

+1 (binding) > On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi All, > > Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache Milagro. > > Please vote accordingly: > [] +1 approve > [] +0 no option > [] -1 disapprove with a reason > > [1]:

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for HertzBeat

Hi - It’s not a branding conflict unless Hertz has a trademark in class 9. The champion or mentors could do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH and see what VP, Brand thinks. After all hertz is a well known unit of measure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz Best, Dave > On Mar 16, 2024, at 7:51 AM, PJ

Re: [VOTE] Accept StormCrawler Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Mar 12, 2024, at 1:33 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am > starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the > proposal: > >

Re: [VOTE] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

+1, binding. (I would be stronger and recommend that it not be done at all.) A string DISCLAIMER on the main page should be enough.) > On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > +1, binding. > > On 3/12/24 19:36, Craig Russell wrote: >> After this discussion >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

There are options. I helped establish ASF Pelican by converting the main ASF website from the Apache CMS. See GitHub.com/apache/www-site/. I don’t think it needs to be decided in the proposal. It can be decided at he beginning of Incubation. Best, Dave > On Mar 7, 2024, at 1:37 PM, tison

Re: svn commit: r1916128 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml

Hi PJ, This part of the site is only maintained in GitHub. All of content/guides in svn are “historical documents”. The directory should probably be removed. Best, Dave > On Mar 5, 2024, at 7:56 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: fanningpj > Date: Tue Mar 5 12:56:04 2024 > New

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

I confirm my interest in being a Mentor. Best, Dave > On Mar 3, 2024, at 6:24 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose StormCrawler [1] as a new Apache Incubator project, > and you can examine the proposal [2] for more details. > > StormCrawler is a collection of

Re: Podling web sites: .incubator. required?

I know of former podlings that have been TLPs for five years that still have assets that read https://project.incubator.apache.org - I think requiring a DISCLAIMER on the main page of every podling website would be better in the long run. The DISCLAIMER

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

> On Feb 24, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at >> [1], including the following podlings according to

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at > [1], including the following podlings according to the report group > info that they should report in this month: > > * answer > * fury > * horaedb > * streampark >

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

> On Feb 20, 2024, at 11:02 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > wt., 20 lut 2024 o 19:19 Craig Russell napisał(a): >> So I thought there was more content which would require transferring IP >> rights. But if it's just a trivial bit of a web page, no issues. > > The only issue with the page right

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

t;> >>> Dear Dave, >>> >>> Hope you are safe and well. >>> >>> Thank you for identifying this issue; how can we correct it? >>> >>> --- >>> Best Regards, >>> Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD >>> Associate Pr

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

m > a newcomer here, I'd like to listen to people's opinions before moving > forward; especially there can be some arguments. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvry49gdclqqdtdcgk0x9hnl18vlxnm8 > > Dave Fisher 于2024年2月21日周三 02:35写道： >>

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

From the commit email it looks like this repository belongs to the Incubator. > On Feb 14, 2024, at 2:27 AM, ti...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tison pushed a change to branch jekyll > in repository

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-282) Modernize Clutch Analysis

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-282: - Summary: Modernize Clutch Analysis Key: INCUBATOR-282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-282 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Perhaps the podling status file in svn was not properly updated? Best, Dave > On Feb 19, 2024, at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html > > Where are the mailing lists? Where is the websi

ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html Where are the mailing lists? Where is the website? Best, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

Yes, that must happen and record the decision via LAZY CONSENSUS. > On Feb 19, 2024, at 1:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the > donation. > > > 1: > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

You could also look into how Solr was spun out of Lucene. It would be up to your PMC whether to make the new PMC identical or not. Doing a podling name search on DataFusion does check a box for the board. The best place to continue this discussion is bo...@apache.org Best, Dave Sent from my

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fury Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 8, 2023, at 3:06 AM, tison wrote: > > Hi Incubator > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fury [1], I > am starting this official vote for the Fury project. > > Here is their proposal: >

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

.com/apache/incubator/blob/1c95cfce15d4a5972662cdd844b7989090972c05/bake.sh#L19 > > I've added https to the property, and changed the podlings.dtd url to > use https, and the site now builds OK. > > >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 22:04, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> FY

Re: Retired podlings not being cleaned up

Please note that retired podlings must never be part of the Attic. The attic is for projects that were TLPs. Retired podlings can move to other places depending on the original contributions. For websites that can mean any number of actions, but it must never be confused with former TLPs that

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

The phrase Apache License with exception … is meaningless the ASF does not allow it under trademarks. Please email tradema...@apache.org for any clarification. If it’s not the Apache License then you can’t call it the Apache License + - or whatever. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of ResilientDB

Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 9, 2023, at 7:51 PM, Suyash Gupta > wrote: > > Hello All > > Let me try to add to Mohammad's response. We defined an initial committer > list of 40+ members as we wanted to give credit to everyone who has > collaborated with us on projects/papers that were

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

FYI - website build has been failing since August 30 due to a switch to use https for the podlings.dtd. The part of the build with the very, very old ant/anakia build somehow requires http. The change to use https is now reverted. A subsequent comment is added to point to where this anakia

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] pulsar-admin-go

Hi, You need to svn co with https. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi tison, > > You are in the Incubator PMC group. The svn right should be fine for > you. You need to use your Apache ID and password to log in. > I just helped you

Re: New Mentor Question: IP Clearance

IP Clearance is for existing PMCs as a process separate from incubation. During Incubation it is expected that IP us being built and brought in to the podling. Mentors should ensure that any SGA or IP diligence needed is filed and reported as part of the podling status file. Sent from my

Re: [DISCUSSION] The retirement of the Apache DataLab (Moving to Apache Attic)

Podlings just “retire", we’ve never moved podlings to the Attic. What retirement means can vary from podling to podling. See https://incubator.apache.org/projects/#retired One example was OpenZipken which “retired” to https://zipkin.io when the community decided that the Apache Way was not for

Re: Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Here is the fix which has worked its way through the clutch and website process. Author: wave Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 New Revision: 1911409 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409=rev Log: Update the minimum podling count from 25 to

Re: svn commit: r1911409 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch2.sh

The clutch stopped building because the minimum podling count used to protect from failing jobs went below 25. > On Aug 2, 2023, at 5:19 AM, w...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wave > Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 > New Revision: 1911409 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409=rev >

Re: [MENTORS] August 2023 Incubator report timeline

Thank you! Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 29, 2023, at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the August 2023 Incubator report timeline: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2023 > > Wed August 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day > Sun August 06 --

Re: clutch repo - is it incorrectly saying Pekko has no distribution area?

It looks like clutch updates may be failing for the last week or so. It may be that we are under a podling count gate. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 19, 2023, at 8:04 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > It's possible that we haven't created the distribution area properly > and if so,

Re: July 2023 Incubator report timeline

The podlings.xml needs to be edited to update your project’s status - see https://incubator.apache.org/cookbook/podlings-xml.html#graduated_as_an_apache_tlp Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 27, 2023, at 7:49 PM, JUN GAO wrote: > > Thanks, I have completed it. > > hulk 于2023年6月27日周二 18:25写道： >

Re: Question on GitHub

They are required to have an ASF served repository either SVN or GiT. Infra has setup the ability to keep the ASF git repository in sync with GitHub repositories in the Apache org space. Podlings starting incubation are supposed to transfer their repositories to the ASF. Best, Dave Sent from

Re: [Podlings]Please check the checksum and signature link

Hi Calvin, I think that since the ASF has moved from a mirror network to a CDN this requirement may have changed without proper updates. Would you mind reaching out to infra to confirm. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 14, 2023, at 10:55 PM, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > On Mon, May 15,

Re: A little incubator game

I liked your original version better. This version never offers to make a frickin’ release. That ought to always be explicitly available. There are too many options now which makes this version of incubation too complex. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 4, 2023, at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Spot podling

+1 (binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 13, 2023, at 1:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > as recently discussed, I think the Spot podling is ready for retirement. > > Several roll calls were made, like this one: >

Re: [VOTE] Retire PageSpeed

+1 (binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 13, 2023, at 1:47 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hello, > > as recently discussed, I think the PageSpeed podling is ready for retirement. > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jxw7mqmpcfxxp0mnnx28o0k78tym507b > > There has been no

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Paimon

An interesting proposal. Since Paimon is already part of Apache Flink does the podling intend to graduate as it’s own Top Level Project? Or, is the plan currently to become a subproject of Flink? I’m just curious. Were there any discussions within the Flink community about incubating Paimon?

Re: [QUESTION] are binary distributions/releases required?

Hi PJ, Daffodil uses sbt and produces binary releases - https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.4.0/ - https://GitHub.com/Apache/daffodil/ Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 8, 2023, at 6:33 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > The release management guide [1] only mentions 'source

Re: [VOTE] Retire Heron from the Incubator

+1 [x] Retire Heron from the Incubator I also want to write that Josh has really tried to make this podling happen. The community had a very slow start and then early on much of the community moved on to other technology. Regards, Dave > On Jan 12, 2023, at 7:20 AM, Josh Fischer wrote: > >

Re: Looking for a champion: HyperIoT

Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 12, 2023, at 5:42 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Hi, > > So, I did have a look at the website and indeed it looks interesting. > However, when I looked at the GitHub repo and the GPL2 yelled at me. > > Are you able to do a re-licensing? I mean … can you ask

Re: [VOTE] KIE proposal acceptance

While I have some concerns about the size of the project I trust the Champion and Mentors. Should the Mentors feel they need help then please reach out here. +1 (binding) > On Jan 10, 2023, at 9:21 AM, Brian Proffitt wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On 2023/01/09 14:50:56 Jason Porter wrote: >>

Re: Are programming languages suitable for Apache?

Apache Groovy - https://groovy.apache.org/ Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 6, 2023, at 1:46 PM, Rupert Smith > wrote: > > Its been a long time since I was last involved as an Apache committer. Back > around 2004ish I contributed to the now defunct qpid project, which was an > implementation of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

Thanks. I think you are onto an idea of community that could be somehow explicitly part of the incubator’s curriculum. That’s a separate discussion. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 11, 2022, at 7:17 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > I agree we don't need to hold the Tuweni graduation for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni graduation

+1 (binding) As one of the podling’s mentors I think that Tuweni is more than ready to be a TLP. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 11, 2022, at 5:11 PM, larry mccay wrote: > > +1 to graduate Tuweni to TLP. > > >> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 8:24 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Hello

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Flagon as Top Level Project

+1(binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 1, 2022, at 6:57 PM, Joshua Poore wrote: > > Hello Incubator, > > Following a DISCUSSION on general@incubator [0], we are calling a VOTE to > Graduate Apache Flagon from the Apache Incubator to a Top Level project. > Please VOTE

Re: package names (pekko related)

Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2022, at 2:24 PM, Jean-Luc Deprez wrote: > > Hi, > > So this discussion is currently revived on Pekko dev. But it's seems the > cards are held by IPMC. > > So a very concrete question. > > Would someone here vote -1, for a Pekko release or Pekko

Re: [DISCUSS] What to do with long incubating projects?

Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 19, 2022, at 5:38 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Is there a maximum time for incubation? Target? I have not read incubator >> docs closely. > > Not really but we expect a projects to exit in 1-3 years, and at 4-5 years we > tend to ask them to retire,

Re: Removed 'incubator.' from project status template

+1. Infra provides both urls immediately and incubator versions of urls live in the codebase forever. The exception would be git repository names and svn dist paths. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 20, 2022, at 11:50 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > FYI, I removed 'incubator' from the

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove 72 hour waiting time to add PPMC members.

Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 13, 2022, at 3:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > The board recently changed the 72-hour waiting time to add a PMC member to a > top level project. We have the same 72-hour waiting time to add PPMC members > to a podling. > > Do we want to consider

Re: [VOTE] Retire Hivemall from Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 27, 2022, at 11:57 PM, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > Hivemall has been incubating since 2016-09-13. > > From last year, activity has been low and the chances of attracting new > committers and building a vibrant community seem very slim at

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator

Hi Julian, This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having explicit plans on removing LGPL/GPL dependencies. Following Apache Release policy is a to do to learn during Incubation. The real question is if the community accepts that their release cycle will be slowed.

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

I’m glad Ambari is out of the Attic! Congratulations! Information about how to take projects out of the Attic is the Attic PMC’s responsibility! Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 20, 2022, at 6:14 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > >  >> >>> Honestly, I think if we can find 3 ative ASF members

Re: [VOTE] Retire Crail

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 6, 2022, at 12:48 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > After years of declining activity[1][2], and following discussions on > dev@ [3][4] the Crail podling has voted to retire from incubation > [5][6]. Per policy [7] I am proposing an IPMC vote to retire

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

should continue with you providing your list of individuals. I’ll follow up in that thread. Regards, Dave > > >> On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 11:34 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jun 2, 2022, at 6:38 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula >> wrote: >>&g

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

> On Jun 2, 2022, at 6:38 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 at 6:53 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Taking projects out of the attic has only happened one time. It was done >> by a PMC. >> > > Is it happened on roll call ? And it’s mne

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

Taking projects out of the attic has only happened one time. It was done by a PMC. Please tell us which project and if you have a community? Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 2, 2022, at 6:19 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have gone through the process to leave the attic[1].

Re: Proposal

Develop an open community and develop in the open. If the community starts to grow then come back and ask for guidance in how to make your open source community an ASF community. Did I mention open and community enough? All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2022, at 10:47 PM, m

Re: Question - are the confluence diffs readable for the Incubator report?

Here’s a future thought. Reach out to dev@community to see if the reporter tool can be adapted for podling reports. We would need to define our use cases as that tool is setup for TLP board reports Sent from my iPhone > On May 9, 2022, at 8:01 PM, Josh Fischer wrote: > > I agree that the

[RESULT][VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

sy> >> >> --- >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:04 PM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >>> +1 to retire >>> >>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022, 14:10 Willem Jiang, wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to retired. >>>> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

Here is my +1. > On Feb 15, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress > as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve > had multiple chances. > > [ ] +1 Retire Blu

[VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve had multiple chances. [ ] +1 Retire BlueMarlin [ ] -1 Keep BlueMarlin and I’m willing to join to make it an Apache Community.

Re: clutch analysis part 1 failing: status pages not updating

ms complicated enough to break things badly. > My python knowledge is limited, and I am not going to attempt to fix this for > you. > > Cheers, > Wilfred > >> On 5 Jan 2022, at 11:06, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> This broke because clutc

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:28 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.1.0

Carrying over my +1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 18, 2022, at 9:26 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Tuweni (incubating) version > 2.1.0. Apache Tuweni is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development > of

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

In this current form this discussion belongs either on dev@logging or board@. Several people here are perfectly capable of forming a proposal, but are choosing to have an unproductive discussion. At this point a new podling would be a hostile fork and those are not accepted. Sent from my

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi - Have a look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age and see that 4 PPMC members are not subscribed to private. Also there are two of your mentors who are not subscribed. Those two probably have not done anything for the AGE podling. > On Jan 6, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of HugeGraph

Hi - Not every repository at GitHub.com/hugegraph is included in the proposal. What does the HugeGraph community intend to do with those repositories? Are any of those key to the project? Thanks, Dave > On Jan 4, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jermy Li wrote: > > Hi, I'm Jermy from HugeGraph team.

Re: clutch analysis part 1 failing: status pages not updating

Hi - This broke because clutch2.py needs to be updated to use lists.apache.org. # Currently prefer these, but consider switch to lists.apache.org MAIL_LIST_URL = "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/“ The code is here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

A slight correction in line. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2021, at 6:32 AM, Juan Pan wrote: > > Hello, > > > After going through all the updates of this thread, here are some inputs from > me, > > > 1. PPMC voting, a NOTICE to board is needed. While incubating the NOTICE is to the

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Have the initial committers for this effort been identified? > On Dec 22, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov > wrote: > > Matt>Attaching patches to Jira is exactly how v1 was developed back in the > day. V2 did it for some time as well before migrating to git > > Matt, let us please refrain

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le mar. 21 déc. 2021 à 12:33, Enrico Olivelli a > écrit : > >> Vladimir, >> I totally support this proposal. >> >> Which are actually the steps we need to cut a release of log4j 1.x ? >> - establish an

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 3:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Vladimir, > I totally support this proposal. > > Which are actually the steps we need to cut a release of log4j 1.x ? > - establish an Apache project ? > - do the fix > - cut a release > > Can this be done

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Hi, Have you discussed the approach you outlined with the logging PMC? It seems to me the idea of a drop in jar that allows log4j 1 over log4j 2 is an ideal product for that PMC to support. All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 8:22 PM, 张铎 wrote: > > I'm the one

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Ko wrote: > > Hello John, > > The number 68 includes > > - > > 28 code contributors who submitted pull requests that were merged. > - > > 40+ who identified bugs, influenced the project with strong and informed > opinion, answered AGE users’

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

ache.org/thread/7428n0p4hwf6lv4v3n9fldqt4wjp6omd It seems like they should be invited as a committer. > > > On 2021/12/17 18:28:51 Dave Fisher wrote: >> Four more concerns: >> >> (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Four more concerns: (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list. (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute? (3) No one has been added to the PPMC. (4) Are all of

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

No one has had time to review. I would like to hear from the AGE mentors. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 16, 2021, at 1:08 PM, Eya Badal wrote: > > I am closing this [DISCUSS] thread now and will start the VOTE shortly to > graduate Apache AGE (incubating) as a top level project. > > Best

Re: BlueMarlin project appears to be inactive

When we first discussed this Futurewei project a year before incubation I thought I made it clear that growing your community is an important part of the Incubation process. You must do that on the dev@ mailing list. When it’s time to discuss contributors who should become committers or PPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept SeaTunnel into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Dec 3, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) > On Dec 2, 2021, at 2:19 PM, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:42 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Good luck! >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Bart Maertens >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Incubator Community, >>> >>> After a

Re: [MENTORS] Download page issues

> On Nov 4, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Sorry for the top post, but the issue of download pages has been raised at > the community and board level. The incubator is a great place to steer > projects in the direction of making it easier to verify that download pages > are

Re: Require websites to have standard download URL?

Hi - > On Sep 17, 2021, at 11:09 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Also: if anyone visits http://podling.apache.org/download > it MUST redirect to > https://podling.apache.org/download . > (Note ‘http’ in first ‘https’ in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Once podlings report their download page something like this can be incorporated in clutch3 which will have svn log info from dist. Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > A while back I wrote a script to check podling download links and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. >> >> Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ >&g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ and for brpc - https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/brpc.html See

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.2.0(-rc.1)

Hey - I’ve reviewed the VOTE thread and there have been 2 +1s from the 3 Podling Mentors. Since Xun Liu VOTED +1 and since August 14 is an IPMC member. I think this passes. > On Aug 26, 2021, at 7:12 PM, Xun Liu wrote: > > hi, Benjamin > > Maybe you need to invite the mentor of the

Re: Dependabot solutions for ASF projects

You should ask this question on bui...@apache.org > On Aug 27, 2021, at 8:56 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > > Hi general@, > I understand that we cannot use automated tooling, specifically Dependbot ( > https://dependabot.com/) because it requests write access to the ASF > project source

Re: Incubator home page not updated

Well - I went to my computer and it was a simple fix. Kick me for not realizing we need to have a simple .asf.yaml file in all git hosted asf-site branches due to recent Apache Infra changes. .asf.yaml: publish: whoami: asf-site Regards, Dave > On Aug 7, 2021, at 6:50 PM, Dave Fis

Re: Incubator home page not updated

I’m away from the computer and cannot look yet. I’ll have a look in about 15 hours. If someone else solves it first that would be great. Best Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2021, at 6:20 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Did someone notice that the incubator home

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-269) Podlings Guides menu is too long and does not scroll

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-269: - Summary: Podlings Guides menu is too long and does not scroll Key: INCUBATOR-269 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-269 Project: Incubator

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >