On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 16:53 +0100, Frank Schafer wrote:
> as I wrote. The wpa_supplicant build failed.
what were the error messages? have you posted a bug to bugs.gentoo.org?
please do, as its the only way it will be fixed.
> No wpa_supplicant
> executable exists. Downloading the packet and buil
as I wrote. The wpa_supplicant build failed. No wpa_supplicant
executable exists. Downloading the packet and build it due to the README
in the package works. No madwifi needed. The download of madwifi is that
what hurts me, not the build.
Regards
Frank
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 18:28 +1300, Nick Rou
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 08:38 +0100, Frank Schafer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the original poster (me ;), got the card (ipw2200) working, would very
> like to use the gentoo methods, but wasn't able to get wpa_supplicant
> (masked) to work.
> He tried to ebuild wpa_supplicant and the (needless) madwifi was
>
Frank Schafer wrote:
Hi,
the original poster (me ;), got the card (ipw2200) working, would very
like to use the gentoo methods, but wasn't able to get wpa_supplicant
(masked) to work.
He tried to ebuild wpa_supplicant and the (needless) madwifi was
downloaded and installed too amd the build failed.
Hi,
the original poster (me ;), got the card (ipw2200) working, would very
like to use the gentoo methods, but wasn't able to get wpa_supplicant
(masked) to work.
He tried to ebuild wpa_supplicant and the (needless) madwifi was
downloaded and installed too amd the build failed.
The (gentoo install
Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
Is there such a thing as deep-dependency? If I try to emerge a ~x86 package
which depends
on a masked package of which I have installed the stable version, emerge will
complain and
I would have to install the dependency first, with all its dependencies. Seems
to me all
d
le to save work, so any hint
will be very welcome.
Regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 08:13 +0100, Schafer Frank w
e and download
wpa_supplicant AND madwifi.
BTW: wpa_supplicant is about 400k ... (totally unneeded) madwifi near 2M
Regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WiFi su
On Wed, January 12, 2005 21:50, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. said:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 04:12 am, "Charlie Gehlin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I disagree, when dealing with a ~x86-package it might have
>> deep-dependencies that is also in ~x86.
>
> Better to be informed about what unstable
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 04:12 am, "Charlie Gehlin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree, when dealing with a ~x86-package it might have
> deep-dependencies that is also in ~x86.
Better to be informed about what unstable packages are being installed than
accept them automatically with any
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 08:13 +0100, Schafer Frank wrote:
> Zes, it is
>
> the Gentoo initscripts are #!/sbin/runscript. There is no ``man
> runscript'', no ``info runscript'' not much available on google. ... But
> sh is well documented.
>
> Hmmm.
have you read this?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/e
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:12 +0100, Schafer Frank wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can't nderstand why things working on LFS, Redhat 7, Aurox, Mandrake,
> Slackware and Debian don't work on Gentoo.
>
> I have (had) a working WiFi net at home. The machine I "upgraded" from
> Aurox to Gentoo wasn't a particip
Schafer Frank wrote:
Zes, it is
the Gentoo initscripts are #!/sbin/runscript. There is no ``man
runscript'', no ``info runscript'' not much available on google. ... But
sh is well documented.
those runscripts in init.d are bash scripts.
It's piped through runscript, so it can call the proper shell
Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Gehlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also disagree on package.keywords since it's better to
test if emerge goes well and that module actually works
before making any static changes regarding keywords
or even USE- & FEATURES-flags for t
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Gehlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 January 2005 9:10 PM
> To: Eugene Rosenzweig
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
>
> I disagree, when dealing with a ~x86-package it might have
> deep-depe
Charlie Gehlin wrote:
I disagree, when dealing with a ~x86-package it might have
deep-dependencies that is also in ~x86.
I also disagree on package.keywords since it's better to
test if emerge goes well and that module actually works
before making any static changes regarding keywords
or even USE-
tage/package.keywords.
>
> See portage manpage for more info.
>
> Eugene.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Charlie Gehlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 12 January 2005 7:58 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user
Gehlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 January 2005 7:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
>
> Try:
>
> 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -Dv ipw2200'
>
> /©harlie
>
> On Wed, January 12, 2
; ... but anyway, thanks for the hint.
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Büchler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
>
> unmask ipw2200, then ther
46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
unmask ipw2200, then there is no need for building the driver yourself.
i've got it here on my laptop, and it works like a charm. (asus travelmate
6002lmi, kernel 2.6.9)
mfg martin
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:35:01
11, 2005 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WiFi success story :|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Schafer Frank wrote:
>
> What will I have to do to change from simpleinit to sysv init? Would
> it be sufficiennt to emerge sysv? Will I have to unmerge simpleinit?
> I'
unmask ipw2200, then there is no need for building the driver yourself.
i've got it here on my laptop, and it works like a charm. (asus
travelmate 6002lmi, kernel 2.6.9)
mfg martin
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:35:01 -0700 (MST), Ric Messier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Ric Mess
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Ric Messier wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Schafer Frank wrote:
What will I have to do to change from simpleinit to sysv init? Would it
be sufficiennt to emerge sysv? Will I have to unmerge simpleinit? I'd
like to have my initscripts #!/bin/sh.
Is that the only reason you want a S
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Schafer Frank wrote:
What will I have to do to change from simpleinit to sysv init? Would it
be sufficiennt to emerge sysv? Will I have to unmerge simpleinit? I'd
like to have my initscripts #!/bin/sh.
Is that the only reason you want a SysV init? A bit odd, especially given:
l
24 matches
Mail list logo
