Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
Well, I think that the solution is what Geir suggests. One think which
bothers me is following. EINTR can happen in different places and the
situations can be quite rare in some
Weldon Washburn wrote:
It seems JIRA is down for maintenance. If HARMONY-1904 is still open
perhaps it makes sense to put a counter in the while (...) { select...}
loop. And after every N loops, print a warning/diagnostic message.
For whom and to what end? Why not just return EINTR (in
LOL. Soon. Maybe tomorrow :)
Until then, use javac from Sun. Or IBM. Or BEA. :)
geir
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
ok, so when will there be an executable javac ? :)
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hey,
I think I read somewhere
Mikhail, I guess there is miscommunication. I didn't suggest to put GC
TLS data to VM_Thread, I think it should have its own TLS key. My
suggestion is to use single key for GC TLS data block pointer, then
use an additional dereference for a GC TLS data field.
Thanks,
xiaofeng
On 10/25/06,
On 10/24/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the lock is global. I used try_enter() to prevent possible deadlock
scenario,
when the finalization happens at precisely the moment finalization thread
is holding
the finalization lock. If this happens, and vm_hint_finalize() cannot grab
On 10/25/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your fix just switch off Finalization Work Balance Subsystem
Pavel, could Work Balance Subsystem be implemented in finilizers threads
directly. That is we will not have Java code executed from helpers?
--
Mikhail Fursov
No. It couldn't. I don't now any solution which can do it.
Pavel Afremov.
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your fix just switch off Finalization Work Balance Subsystem
Pavel, could Work Balance Subsystem be
The Work Balance Subsystem task is to start new finalizing threads when
all active threads are busy, isn't it?
The solution could be:
1) Add +1 thread: finalizers manager
2) notify this thread (as Salikh proposed) to start finalization and do the
Work Balance Subsystem job.
Does it work or am I
On 10/24/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW to test how things work with Intel compiler I've installed it on Gentoo
(version 9.1.042, it is marked as unstable, but the most recent stable is
very old - 7.1.006... which version do you use?) and failed to compile drlvm
with it.
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a fix or a workaround? Is there a bug in ECJ?
geir
Me and Evgueni consider this a fix.
We should adapt the algorithm of accessibility control to working with
classes compiled with both compilers. The difference berween
Good idea Mikhail!
I think I will base on it in my future solution.
I see only one negative side for it. Quantity of the treads increased by
one in normal situation.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Pavel Afremov.
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Work Balance Subsystem task
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We're a volunteer project, so supported is based on interest in
community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
a community commit to support.
I think we can define support as - one or more people in the
community tests on that
Not sure if this is covered in a test elsewhere, but we could check
that the getLocalName() returns a non-null, non-empty string? After
all, both localhost and 127.0.0.1 should return valid lookups.
The other possibiltiy is to fork an 'nslookup' or 'host' command
(depending on platform) to find
On 10/25/06, Aleksey Ignatenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Egor,
But it has 1 more cons -- JIT should change it's devirtualizer
accordingly to the VTable change. Doable, of course.
There is no need to change struct VTable structure - it could be simply
inlined in pinned VTable object + 1
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Mikhail, how about this:
In GC thread init:
gc_tls_data_ptr = malloc_gc_tls_data(sizeof(GC_Thread_Info) );
gc_tls_key = thread_create_tls_key();
thread_set_tls_data( gc_tls_key, gc_tls_data_ptr);
To fast alloc:
gc_tls_data_ptr =
Stepan,
I support you idea, but IMHO the page you pointed out to is out-of-date.
I suggest using
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Platforms_to_Run_Harmony_Development_Kit_
on as it seems to be much more suitable. I tried to support it adding
up-to-date info and posting the discussion issues. I'll
On 10/25/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea Mikhail!
I think I will base on it in my future solution.
I see only one negative side for it. Quantity of the treads increased by
one in normal situation.
Any ideas?
the only idea I have is to spawn N threads at once if
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Mikhail, how about this:
In GC thread init:
gc_tls_data_ptr = malloc_gc_tls_data(sizeof(GC_Thread_Info) );
gc_tls_key = thread_create_tls_key();
thread_set_tls_data( gc_tls_key,
On 10/25/06, Konovalova, Svetlana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments? Objections?
Wow! the only platform with bugs we have is Windows XP with VS.NET 2005
Community Edition ! :)
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today that my
platform works OK, but the next commit
2006/10/25, Alex Blewitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The other possibiltiy is to fork an 'nslookup' or 'host' command
(depending on platform) to find out what the platform thinks is the
local host name, and then comparing it to Java's result.
On this WinServer2003 nslookup localhost and nslookup
Xiao-Feng,
Even if you do not need to have constant offsets, it's better to use TM
directly to allocate TLS slots.
In this case we can remove extra code from VM: the computation of the third
parameter in the next method:
extern Managed_Object_Handle (*gc_alloc_fast)(unsigned size,
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we need multiple slots? Can't we use just one slot, which
stores a pointer to a user data structure (the GC_Thread_Info in this
case)?
Yes you can store a pointer. But in this
does it make sense to put it on the site?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
We're a volunteer project, so supported is based on interest in
community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
a community
+1
--
Ivan
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikhail, I guess there is miscommunication. I didn't suggest to put GC
TLS data to VM_Thread, I think it should have its own TLS key. My
suggestion is to use single key for GC TLS data
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Hello Nataly
It looks like a workaround to me to run the tests for VM. To run other
user applications we need a general solution about what to do with non
standard libraries which Intel compiler links with.
On Gentoo if you install icc,
Wow! the only platform with bugs we have is Windows XP with VS.NET
2005
Community Edition ! :)
Well... are you sure? Or do you make this supposition judging by the
Platforms to Run Harmony Development Kit on page? The point is that I
didn't have enough info to fill in the empty table cells. My
Nataly Naumova wrote:
On 10/24/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW to test how things work with Intel compiler I've installed it on
Gentoo
(version 9.1.042, it is marked as unstable, but the most recent
stable is
very old - 7.1.006... which version do you use?) and failed to
My two cents...
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today
that
my
platform works OK, but the next commit brokes it, who will update the
page?
IMHO if the next commit breakes the work-ok-platform and if you notice
it, why not to update the wiki page? Or you can let
Xiao-Feng, I think there should be no problem to get this to work.
But, I also agree with Mikhail that it could be benefitial to have
data directly available in TLS without additional pointer dereference.
If we will have corresponding interface function to allocate more then
one void pointer at
Do you think we can add a note with the revision number? This way, you
at least know that the code of revision worked ok/failed on this
platform. Because such tests are done systematically, changing
revisions
would not take much time to update.
+1 Good idea! :)
Cheers,
Sveta
Could you also tell me which version of icc you are using?
Sorry -
icc -V
Intel(R) C Compiler for 32-bit applications, Version 9.0Build
20051020Z Package ID: l_cc_c_9.0.027
--
Nataly Naumova,
Intel Middleware Products Division
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
does it make sense to put it on the site?
To put what? The definition of supported platform or/and the list of
supported platforms?
I think it makes sense to put at least the definition.
Thanks,
Stepan.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Stepan Mishura
On
Since the ImageConsumer accepts Hashtable?,? my thought is that the
the GifDecoder should declare the field based on what it actually
uses. If the other decoders only use String keys and String values,
then I would suggest we change the field declaration to match.
Yes, it sounds reasonable.
On
Yes, this can be an optimization.
I am not very sure if we can get obvious performance improvement with
this. I am usually conservative with interface change. :-) Since
neither Windows nor Linux provides this kind of native support, I am
guessing they have their rationality.
We probably want
Guys,
Last two days I cannot run the simplest things on DRLVM on Linux:
drlvm/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin/java -cp . NoSuchClass
free(): invalid pointer 0x808d800
[launcher crash dump follows]
Is it my local problem? Or someone have faced this as well?
With best
yes, I mean the current definitions
Then we could discuss the lists
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/10/25, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
does it make sense to put it on the site?
To put what? The definition of supported platform or/and the list of
supported
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 10/25/06, Konovalova, Svetlana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments? Objections?
Wow! the only platform with bugs we have is Windows XP with VS.NET 2005
Community Edition ! :)
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today that my
I suggest just to provide just the definition and to add a link from the
site to the corresponding wiki page.
Cheers,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:29 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re:
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We probably want to delay this optimization in TM until we have
evidance for it, since what Mikhail wants is just to inline GC tls
data access easily.
Ok, I understand it and agree. Today I'm going do the measurements/changes
only for gc_cc.
Hello All,
in general we do not have any objections to implement such
functionality, but as far as I understand this will be quite unique TM
feature (no other threading library have this, or give me a link)
which is intended to improve performance. And if we going to extend TM
interface for
No problem, I can modify GCv5 for this. Thanks, -xiaofeng
On 10/25/06, Mikhail Fursov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We probably want to delay this optimization in TM until we have
evidance for it, since what Mikhail wants is just to inline GC tls
Congratulations!
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
As progress towards our goal of having all committers on the PPMC, the
Harmony PPMC is proud to announce it's newest members :
Nathan Beyer
Paulex Yang
Weldon Washburn
Please join us in congratulating them (and then tell them to get back
to
My congratulations!
2006/10/25, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As progress towards our goal of having all committers on the PPMC, the
Harmony PPMC is proud to announce it's newest members :
Nathan Beyer
Paulex Yang
Weldon Washburn
Please join us in congratulating them (and then
On 10/24/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
I agree that test should be fixed. I suggested using one of the
following checks to validate that the host is localhost.
InetAddress.getByName(host).isLoopbackAddress()
InetAddress.getByName(host).isSiteLocalAddress()
I have
On 10/25/06, Stepan Mishura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today that
my
platform works OK, but the next commit brokes it, who will update the
page?
I guess - you'll update :-)
This is optimistic behaviour:). Let's try and see if it
Thank you.
Just tell me when GCv5 is ready and I'll clean VM part. + This is not the
first priority task today.
On 10/25/06, Xiao-Feng Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, I can modify GCv5 for this. Thanks, -xiaofeng
--
Mikhail Fursov
On 10/25/06, Nikolay Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
in general we do not have any objections to implement such
functionality, but as far as I understand this will be quite unique TM
feature (no other threading library have this, or give me a link)
which is intended to improve
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 10/16/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* wrote:
We're a volunteer project, so supported is based on interest in
community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as
a community commit to support.
I think we can define support as - one or more
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
Stepan,
I support you idea, but IMHO the page you pointed out to is out-of-date.
I suggest using
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Platforms_to_Run_Harmony_Development_Kit_
on as it seems to be much more suitable. I tried to support it adding
up-to-date info and
Yes - lets just get something up on the wiki, and we can discuss/tune
from there.
(and yes, we need a link to this from the site)
geir
Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
I suggest just to provide just the definition and to add a link from the
site to the corresponding wiki page.
Cheers,
Sveta
Congrats!
-Mark.
On 24 October 2006 at 18:41, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As progress towards our goal of having all committers on the PPMC, the
Harmony PPMC is proud to announce it's newest members :
Nathan Beyer
Paulex Yang
Weldon Washburn
Please join us in
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x20C day of Apache Harmony Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
Hello all!
As you probably know current version of harmony DRLVM has no class unloading
support. This leads to the fact that some Java applications accumulate
memory leaks leading to memory overflow and crashes.
Well deserved congratulations.
Tim
On 24/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As progress towards our goal of having all committers on the PPMC, the
Harmony PPMC is proud to announce it's newest members :
Nathan Beyer
Paulex Yang
Weldon Washburn
Please join us in
3.- Will be possible to create graphics in awt-headless mode? I would
like to test servlets generating charts (using JFreeCharts) in a Linux
box without a graphics environment.
Definitely, headless support will be implemented in the future and
there are no obstacles which prevent us from
As Tim asked earlier in the thread... is there a clear definition of
what this means? A spec maybe?
Also.. Martin... want to help? :)
geir
Oleg Khaschansky wrote:
3.- Will be possible to create graphics in awt-headless mode? I would
like to test servlets generating charts (using
As Tim asked earlier in the thread... is there a clear definition of
what this means? A spec maybe?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/awt/AWTChanges.html#headless
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Tim asked earlier in the thread... is there a clear
Earlier in the year we discussed junit best practice. For example,
making sure assertEquals calls have the expected and actual arguments in
the correct order to avoid getting confusing failure messages.
Robert posted a script a week or so ago, to look for some of junit
issues but it didn't
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and store here some scripts for
automatic run of other-projects unit tests? Seems, in this case
I can help testing, since I don't have the skills in C/C++.
Usually, what I do on linux boxes is:
1.- Minimal O.S. install, text-only. Include XOrg shared libraries. No
need to start any XOrg related service.
2.- Install my IBM JRE v1.4.2
3.- Start my java server process (servlet engine) with
Cool - but why not just put into SVN somewhere?
either in enhanced/tools or classlib/trunk somewhere where it can be
invoked as an option by people from ant (so that we can wire it into the
CI system...)
geir
Mark Hindess wrote:
Earlier in the year we discussed junit best practice. For
Excelent point. Performance data is quite needed to make this change.
But how we can obtain it without a prototype? What about making
experimental patch to measure performance of this optimization? We can
safely drop it if it doesn't make sense.
--
Ivan
On 10/25/06, Nikolay Kuznetsov [EMAIL
Oleg, I just read it, does this mean that all methods that don't need
to throw the special Headless exception, are ready to work in headless
mode? If so, we are just a step away for supporting headless?
Regards,
Martin
On 10/25/06, Oleg Khaschansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Tim asked
Oleg, I just read it, does this mean that all methods that don't need
to throw the special Headless exception, are ready to work in headless
mode? If so, we are just a step away for supporting headless?
No. It is not so.
On 10/25/06, Martin Cordova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg, I just read
On 25 October 2006 at 18:36, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and store here some
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
My two cents...
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today
that
my
platform works OK, but the next commit brokes it, who will update the
page?
IMHO if the next commit breakes the work-ok-platform and if you notice
it, why not to update
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 25 October 2006 at 7:41, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool - but why not just put into SVN somewhere?
Okay. classlib/trunk/support/tools/bin perhaps?
Sure. Whatever you feel is best. I have no strong opinion. We do have
junit tests in DRLVM too,
As I understand all of us vote to remove (comment) check which fails
concerned test. So I will prepare a patch.
2006/10/25, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/24/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
I agree that test should be fixed. I suggested using one of the
Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt
dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for
architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib.
I'm going to fix the README, build.xml files, and makefiles to use the
standard harmony define for
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 25 October 2006 at 18:36, Vladimir Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent!
I have one more idea: we already have buildtest module. Some time ago we
agreed to extends it by coverage and japi scripts (I hope it happens soon:)
). May be we extend it one more time and
infrastructure still isn't fully back up yet.
Minotaur, the main user machine, didn't make the journey.
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
Hi to everybody,
Does anybody know why JIRA stopped sending notifications of a change to
issue reporter?
Some time ago it didn't work as well. And before the
Mark Hindess wrote:
Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt
dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for
architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib.
I'm going to fix the README, build.xml files, and makefiles to use the
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just one little note from me... AFAIK Window and Linux have limitation
on the number of TLS slots which can be allocated for any particular
thread. I believe here is strong (probably performance) reasons for
doing so. It can be a problem to implement
Geir,
Thank you for your quick answer.
Regards
--
Alexey A. Ivanov
Intel Middleware Product Division
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:02 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] No change
On 10/25/06, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just one little note from me... AFAIK Window and Linux have limitation
on the number of TLS slots which can be allocated for any particular
thread. I believe here is strong (probably performance) reasons
Hello Weldon
I've noticed that along with changes from Rana's patch from HARMONY-1786
you've committed some changes compile_IA32.cpp. They don't seem to be
related to the patch, but rather a part of MMTK integration. Could it be
that you had some modifications to compile_IA32.cpp and accidently
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
It seems JIRA is down for maintenance. If HARMONY-1904 is still open
perhaps it makes sense to put a counter in the while (...) { select...}
loop. And after every N loops, print a warning/diagnostic message.
Hi,
I have posted the patch for HARMONY-1920. I will be glad if some
committer take a look at it. I mean the more powerfull one than me :-/
I've also tried to resolve HARMONY-1921, but it seems a good luni
expertice is required for that. So it may be the good task for local
luni exprets
Currently, the federation build looks at the revision of the federation
tree that you have checked out and checks out the same revision of the
classlib and drlvm trees.
Since we want releases to be reproducible (i.e. known tags of not only
classlib and drlvm but also of the federation code that
On 25 October 2006 at 9:04, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Currently there is a quick hack in make/depends.xml because the awt
dependencies have extensions that use a different convention for
architecture names than the one used in the rest of classlib.
Thanks Paulex. I really should have remembered that when I committed
that the JIRA to move that code.
-Mark.
On 25 October 2006 at 13:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pyang
Date: Wed Oct 25 06:21:53 2006
New Revision: 467634
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467634
Log:
On 10/25/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
It seems JIRA is down for maintenance. If HARMONY-1904 is still open
perhaps it makes sense to put a counter in the while (...) { select...}
loop. And
Any security guys can help to look at this issue? thanks in advance. I
haven't found time to looked closer to find the cause yet, but it seems
a little serious.
Paulex Yang (JIRA) wrote:
[classlib][security] Harmony cannot read security policy file correctly
On 10/24/06, Aleksey Ignatenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Automatic class unloading approach.*
Automatic class unloading means that j.l.Classloader instance is
unloaded
automatically (w/o additional enumeration tricks or GC dependency) and
after
we detect that some class loader was unloaded we
Mark, I have just tried your tool. It's really helpful, thanks a lot!
It's so pitty that script doesn't fix issues by itself =)
2006/10/25, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 25 October 2006 at 7:41, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool - but why not
Weldon,
You sort of missed that in the proposal. Current (possibly compressed)
vtable pointer at the offset 0 in the object layout will be replaced with
(possibly compressed) ManagedObject*. VTable itself is going to become an
object allocated in Java heap.
So, no encrease in object size.
Martin Cordova wrote:
Oleg, I just read it, does this mean that all methods that don't need
to throw the special Headless exception, are ready to work in headless
mode?
Right, that is my question too. I've seen the general description at
the URL Oleg sent, it's hardly a spec tho'.
Presumably
And yes, there will be reference to corresponding java/lang/Class in VTable
object. Which means that j/l/Class will be reachable from any object of this
class.
So, still no object size increase. :)
Pavel.
On 10/25/06, Weldon Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/06, Aleksey Ignatenko
any comments? any at all?
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I've been anticipating this moment for 2 years now... :)
While it doesn't seem possible given infrastructure issues that are
interfering with mail to get something in front of the board tomorrow
(plus the fact that the board likes things
I agree with Salikh -- the wiki will never keep up if you expect such
frequent manual updates. That's a job for the test results' collator.
Regards,
Tim
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
My two cents...
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today
that
On 25 October 2006 at 18:38, Denis Kishenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, I have just tried your tool. It's really helpful, thanks a lot!
It's so pitty that script doesn't fix issues by itself =)
It could (and I have been known to use scripts to fix things) but as
Nathan recently pointed
Mark Hindess wrote:
Currently, the federation build looks at the revision of the federation
tree that you have checked out and checks out the same revision of the
classlib and drlvm trees.
That was just for convenience if you don't care.
It doesn't work all that well in practice, because
Right, that is my question too. I've seen the general description at
the URL Oleg sent, it's hardly a spec tho'.
I don't think that spec for this exists.
Another document on this is [1]. It describes what can and what cannot
be done in headless mode. But we also have the list of methods which
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any comments? any at all?
Geir,
Sorry about my confusion. Is this synonymous with or a part of the
process of applying to Apache to graduate us from incubator status?
Thanks,
Rana
I see, thanks. The TLP proposal looks good to me.
Rana
On 10/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
On 10/25/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any comments? any at all?
Geir,
Sorry about
Geir
Some tests launched by command build test fail.
The idea of build test is to run it before each commit. In this way you can
catch regressions.
In order to effectively catch regressions, i.e. tests that started to fail
after some change,
it's necessary to have 'build test' pass in a stable
Ok, thanks all, I see now.
Can I suggest that we define the supported platforms (the term itself +
the list of currently supported combinations) on the site. We can also
keep a Wiki page for related issues.
The platform support info could go to the download-snapshots page.
Thank you,
Nadya
The ideal way would be for acceptance tests like build test to always pass
and to catch and roll back the patch that breaks this invariant, rather than
to disable the tests. But I agree with Vera, it is important to keep a
running set up as acceptance tests, so disabling the well known failures
If you mean libxlib, how it could be used without X server? Maybe some
other library (e.g. font library like xft) simply preloads it during
its initialization or tries to connect to the server (XOpenDisplay) to
get some data, fails and uses defaults?
Anyway, I think, testing on a headless
I don't know how it works, but what I can do is try to use headless
without XOrg shared libs installed, and then take note of the missing
.so modules the IBM JVM complains about).
Regards,
Martin
On 10/25/06, Oleg Khaschansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you mean libxlib, how it could be used
Could it be treated as a reverse engineering? I don't know :)
On 10/25/06, Martin Cordova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how it works, but what I can do is try to use headless
without XOrg shared libs installed, and then take note of the missing
.so modules the IBM JVM complains about).
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
