!
On 11/16/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey,
I personally like the metric. It does not always reflect the
proportional amount of documentation, but the files at the top of
the
list (the worst files) indeed require attention :)
I guess the metric shows both
Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Egor,
I agree with you on the idea
and put on
harmonytest.org (or even Wiki) regularly? It should encourage people
(like me) to document sources better. Or it is too much effort?
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
text.
So do I :-)
Thanks!
On 11/16/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey,
I personally like the metric. It does not always reflect the
proportional amount of documentation, but the files at the top of the
list (the worst files) indeed require attention :)
I guess the metric
Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a collection
of
links
to
the
main website and other resources with short
descriptions
(Site
Map
is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin
wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a
collection
of
links
to
the
main
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting
started
with
DRL
is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin
wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Egor
Pasko
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting started
with
DRL
is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin
wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:14 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting started with DRL is
outdated
what's the link we're talking about?
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
What
there, anyway.
geir
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/getting_started.
html#Disclaimer
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/developers_guide
.html - these seem to have apache and intel copyright (can be
resolved)
+ the Unicode disclaimer
My two cents below.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Ivanov, Alexey A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:56 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [doc] site.css
Hi all,
I've updated formatting of definition lists DL on site:
section here.
Thanks,
Pavel
On 11/13/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Successfully added a patch to fix getting Started outdated content to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2150.
The patch is not final - need help to add more content. The current
structure
Resending the email. Really sad that we haven't received any feedback
yet.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 11:11 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Anybody tried DRLVM
Of Egor Pasko
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting started with
DRL
is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] The document Getting started with
DRL is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea
is
outdated
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Alexei,
Tutorials might be fine for mature projects, but I do not think ours
is
ready for a big flow of users yet, that would require a tutorial.
So +1 for having a nice good tutorial ... one day.
If there are volunteers to write the tutorial now, I'd
] The document Getting started with
DRL
is
outdated
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a collection of
links
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a collection of links to the
main website and other resources with short descriptions (Site Map
or something) so that people are comfortable floating around in the web.
+1 for
* preparing the Commonly Used Options for DRLVM (omitting the word
contains no more than two lines. This
page has fourty lines of legal staff. Is it really needed?
Thanks!
On 11/8/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'd like to share everyone's grief at the sight of outdated Getting
Started document. However, I'd not hurry to eliminate the page
/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a collection of links to
the
main website and other resources with short descriptions (Site Map
or something) so that people are comfortable floating around in the
web.
We
,
Alexey.
Best regards,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:18 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Good issue resolution guideline (was:
[classlib]volunteer to supply patches for old JIRAs
Folks,
Has anybody tried working with DRLVM in Eclipse? did you have to screw
it before it ran ok? Do you have anything to share? Let's write a doc!
Background
We've been trying to gather useful info on working with Eclipse and our
code base. Eclipse+classlib page has been updated, see JIRA
Sian,
As I understand, thanks to your patches, we now have a nice webpage that
describes generics + classlib specifics, with a few items for drlvm.
This is an achievement as it is, so perhaps, we can hold off rolling
back to classlib only :)
I sent an email just now to ask people whether anybody
On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
On 11/9/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Egor,
+1 for
Just idea: Getting Started may contain a collection of links to
the
main website and other resources with short descriptions (Site
Map
or something) so
All,
I'd like to share everyone's grief at the sight of outdated Getting
Started document. However, I'd not hurry to eliminate the page as such.
We might reconsider some of its contents, change structure, and update
individual bits, but please think carefully before removing the page.
I think
About strange things in the website structure: good catch!
I guess the site is just in the middle of some transition:
dev_eclipse_movie.html and dev_eclipse.html probably should be under
documentation, not under subcomponents/classlib. And build_classlib is
just outdated and should not be there
Alexey,
Would be great if there we some page that had a link to the page;
otherwise, you cannot find it from within wiki, only from the link in
your mail :(
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006
Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 6:26 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
Egor,
I agree with you
: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
documentation?
On the 0x21A day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
On 11/7/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge
increaseth sorrow
I'm also +1 to document
Mikhail,
Do you think it is part of 'culture' to update a comment when changing
behavior of its function? Otherwise, you can erase all comments
altogether since you don't guarantee they're up-to-date :)
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Fursov [mailto:[EMAIL
are welcome.
SY, Alexey
2006/11/7, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
Would be great if there we some page that had a link to the page;
otherwise, you cannot find it from within wiki, only from the link in
your mail :(
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexey
,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:18 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] new docs added - JIT compiler
oh, thankyou thankyou thankyou
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Yeah
Great to hear that! Let me know if you need help.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Leviev, Ilia A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:35 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [doc] What should be improved in DRLVM Doxygen
Egor,
I agree with you on the idea of simplicity: documented vs.
non-documented.
An additional point: do you think we need/want to evaluate quality of
comments? we could check for required Doxygen tags in certain elements.
For example, a function is almost certain to include @param and @return.
documentation size. It would also decrease a
number of well documented pages on garbage collection, since new GCs
don't have as much comments in their code as old GC V4.
[NM] yeah, I read the news :)
Thank you for nice catches,
Alexei
On 11/2/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Alexei
Recommended well-documented source code (personal preference)
Ongoing development: Class.h - see JIRA-1558 for latest patch
Done: in vm - StackIterator.h, Verifier.h, vm_gc.h; in jit - jet,
ControlFlowGraph.h; JPDA sources...
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexei
] more self-dependent VM tasks, newbies welcome
Nadya,
Thanks for the links, I added new subpage to TODO_List_for_DRLVM.
2006/11/2, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey,
Do you think you can post these on Wiki? We actually have several
pages
there that can help arrange and store
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:21 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc]Please help to remove outdated info from the site
Nice - buy why not put the tasks in JIRA?
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Thanks all who helped with the what can we do now page - the new
page
it is still to be
done.
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Not that I know of :( bits of things are in the devguide,
maybe.
But you
probably won't find that of much notice.
Anyone, please tell me it's not true!
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexey
Wow! Alexei, great start!
... and so many pages marked with 0 rank. I really appreciate your
effort - it sets me back on earth and to work. I hope this rating would
also make owners of code more ambitious, and would inspire them to write
more/better comments to get a better rating :)
Question on
Not that I know of :( bits of things are in the devguide, maybe. But you
probably won't find that of much notice.
Anyone, please tell me it's not true!
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
mean?
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 4:33 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] No Doxygen reference for code :(
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed
/browse/HARMONY-2024, so committers could
now put documentation to the web site and everyone could contribute to
the documentation quality.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October
:
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/index.htm
l
2006/11/1, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed that there's no API reference documentation for Harmony
code - generated by Doxygen/Javadoc. I guess many will agree
explanation. How about we put the API document in each
subcomponents(classlib/drlvm/jchevm), but also add their link in
documentation/documentation.html?
2006/11/1, Paulex Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed that there's no API reference documentation
Alexey,
Do you think you can post these on Wiki? We actually have several pages
there that can help arrange and store such development items:
Starting point, choose your subpage
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_List_for_DRLVM
Sample http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/JIT_Development_Tasks
Wiki
Thanks all who helped with the what can we do now page - the new page is
shorter but none the less useful.
My suggestion is to add more links to the page. It now only links to the
applist. More candidates: classlib status page [1], wiki drlvm todo items [2],
website doc development [3]. What
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:18 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] new docs added - JIT compiler
oh, thankyou thankyou thankyou
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Yeah! No problem, I was just thinking
it, but Doxygen's main idea is
to get docs straight from code. So any change to doxygen's input should
probably be a patch in JIRA. We've had such patches before.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL
it as it is?
Is it actually out of date?
Cheers,
Sveta
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:45 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [build] Building on Eclipse - FYI
Sveta,
I've taken a brief
All,
New documents have been added to HARMONY-2003. These are a description
of the Jitrino.OPT and .JET compilers, with a supplementary doc on the
pipeline management framework inside the JITs. The docs describe the
architecture, processes and usage of the components.
It would be great if
Sveta,
I've taken a brief look at the patch, and I like most of your
corrections. The page looks neater this way, and holds important data.
One question: can't we say that some of the tips given on the page apply
to harmony code in general, not just classlib? So a side idea would be
to have one
+1
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Konovalova, Svetlana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:05 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [build] Building on Eclipse - FYI
Well, my 2cents:
My concern is that if there is too much
Geir, about your suggestion
I think that if we have an eclipse document, and the info is accurate,
I
say why not?
I also think that the more docs the better :) issues that I see with
this particular doc:
- info is not always up-to-date: old cmd options, old java executable
name, many other
, heck, I don't
want to download each of those separate thingies... I just want a zip or
tgz of them... easier to handle...
So please? :)
geir
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
All,
New documents have been added to HARMONY-2003. These are a description
of the Jitrino.OPT and .JET compilers
Perhaps, you can store it on JIRA? I do get an email a third time, and
none of them has an attachment:(
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Konovalova, Svetlana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 5:01 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
My two cents...
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today
that
my
platform works OK, but the next commit brokes it, who will update the
page?
IMHO if the next commit breakes the work-ok-platform and if you notice
it, why not to update the wiki page? Or you can let
updates. That's a job for the test results' collator.
Regards,
Tim
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
My two cents...
I do not understand the lifecycle of this page. If I report today
that
my
platform works OK, but the next commit brokes it, who will update
the
page?
IMHO
+1
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 11:30 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [vote] Graduate Apache Harmony podling from the Incubator
We're trying something a little
Egor,
You're a treasure keeper, so many useful tips :)
As you mentioned yourself, this info should be on the website, and I
side with you on this.
We actually have some debugging tips already:
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/drlvm/debugging_VM_and
_JIT.html
However, they don't
Egor,
Thanks for a detailed an proactive response.
Surely, I think we can start accumulating new content on Wiki - this is
more visible and editable than patches to website. When we're done with
the bulk of content, I'll migrate the stable stuff to the site.
* Thaking the one above into
]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 4:59 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: [drlvm] How to debug the drlvm with gdb?
On 10/20/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summing up: the decision for now = Add new pages for Wiki =
- Debugging on Linux - Egor has volunteered
I side with all those who suggest that we write things down on Wiki.
Grouping issues by component might also work out fine.
Another suggestion: distinguish between Known Issues and TODOs - that
is, between bugs and non-implemented features. I think this will allow
us to see what needs to be
a little bit of advertising
the tool which I personally consider the best
for the purposes of documentation authoring.
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
About concern for updating resulting HTML and not the source TXT
for Asciidoc-generated documents:
However, for the How to Write a GC document, I do
Folks,
I've had a strange impression just now that we have too many building
instructions for Harmony sources:
[1]
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/build_cla
sslib.html Building Class Library only
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/quickhelp_contributors.htm
Folks,
Yes, I do have a newer version of the source file that produced the
GC-howto document currently on the site - see attached.
I am not sure we actually need to sync up with the original
Asciidoc-input file. Will send a separate email with my thoughts soon.
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Morozova, Nadezhda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:26 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [doc]too many building instructions?
Folks,
I've had a strange impression just now that we have too many building
instructions for Harmony
Salikh,
About your concern for updating resulting HTML and not the source TXT
for Asciidoc-generated documents:
I agree that technically Sveta's approach is not professional :)
However, for the How to Write a GC document, I do not think that the
issue is big enough because the doc seems quite
Weldon, all,
I've a question about the GC interface (just double-checking):
We currently have gc_cc, gc_gen, and gcv4 folders in VM, corresponding
to three different collectors, right? Do then all use an identical API?
do they all work exactly as the doc describes?
Thank you,
Nadya Morozova
improvement
On 10/17/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Weldon, all,
I've a question about the GC interface (just double-checking):
We currently have gc_cc, gc_gen, and gcv4 folders in VM, corresponding
to three different collectors, right?
Coorect.
Do then all use an identical
Geir,
I have a question:
The Quick Help guides (with patches applied) now list the required and
additional tools that are needed to get and build our sources.
Do you think we can also include some sure-to-work configurations that
are now discussed in thread [general] version of gcc and other
Folks,
I've a problem. We used to have the class library porting documentation
generated automatically and stored in
enhanced/classlib/trunk/doc/vm_doc. It is not there any more. I vaguely
recollect that we had a decision to port the docs to the website. Is
this done? The old place does not have
. so I believe you can
find it in your local working copy.
On 10/13/06, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I've a problem. We used to have the class library porting
documentation
generated automatically and stored in
enhanced/classlib/trunk/doc/vm_doc. It is not there any more. I
, Morozova, Nadezhda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
But I think it would be also nice if the doc is available from the
site
somehow, like, via a link to the index.html file. Someone might just
want the big picture without downloading the sources. And other docs
might want to link to this one
... will be there in next few hours...
geir
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
I seem to have replied to a wrong address, and so the issue was not
resolved :( could you please look below
There's one webpage, the description of the thread manager, that has
no
graphics displayed with it ;(
It would be great
JIRA 1730 for these changes?
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/quickhelp_users.html
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/quickhelp_contributors.html
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Fedotov, Alexei A
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:23 AM
To: Morozova
in the README.txt to the website.
geir
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Thanks for the fix, Alexei. I think this is a good start for updating the
README.
I've looked at the current version, and many other things are out-of-date
(such as ij as the name of our executable). Some things are also duplicated
it on the website, and put a
pointer in the README.txt to the website.
geir
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Thanks for the fix, Alexei. I think this is a good start for updating the
README.
I've looked at the current version, and many other things are out-of-date
(such as ij as the name of our
... My two cents:
The path to a component
should end with component's status info - ideally it should give the
newbie
enough info not to search though harmony-dev mail archive or JIRA at
all.
Good point, but am not sure we're ready for it just now. I haven't found
nice wiki pages for each
+1 for Wiki. This is a more edit-friendly solution.
I can also add a link to your Wiki page from the website - for people to
know where to look for guidelines ;)
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Paulex,
I agree to your suggestions on keeping the config files for generated
docs only. As for
And, maybe we can add a build-doc target in the
classlib/trunk/build.xml to make document creation more handy.
I fully side with that. Moreover, I'd suggest that we add such a target
for DRLVM
Do you think we can have the docs built on a regular basis (like, a
script that triggers Doxygen build say 2 times a week + on demand to
push updates if needed) and resulting docs stored on the website?
This way, you don't have SVN versioning for auto-generated content and
keep info available for
Hi,
There's a little glitch in website: DRLVM page links into SVN for the
developer's guide though the site directory has the correct file.
Could somebody please apply the fix attached to JIRA 1631
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1631?
Nadya Morozova
Geir,
I double-checked the documentation.html page - it still has no site.css
attached and does not display nicely. :(
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:28 PM
To:
6:47 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] new Getting Started guides
Do you mean :
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/documentation/documentation.html
looks ok to me... will look closely at source later
geir
On Sep 26, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir
Geir,
That's right, we have pre tag set to have a border around code
snippets. You can change it if you like. The initial border setting has
come with the drl-style presentation.
Note: some (but not all) code snippets, like the apache license quote
presented as a text, have a border, but it is
Geir,
Do you think it might be easier to use Wiki as storage for all FAQs like
that for now? I mean, not all of those who help find FAQ entries have
ever checked out the website and would be willing to make patches to a
FAQ.xml page. Wiki is easier to use when we're accumulating info. We
could
Geir,
I know where the outer box comes from - site.vsl, special handling of
source snippets. Can send you a quick patch to remove the outer box.
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:25
Geir,
One question: if I (or somebody else for that matter) decide to change
the site.css file, which copy in the checked-out version do I modify?
Sorry if this sounds stupid...
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
Do you think it might be easier to use Wiki as storage for all FAQs
like
that for now? I mean, not all of those who help find FAQ entries have
ever checked out the website and would be willing to make patches to a
FAQ.xml page
want to verify before I check it in?
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
I know where the outer box comes from - site.vsl, special handling of
source snippets. Can send you a quick patch to remove
Geir,
In the website, the folder docs/documentation does not seem to have a
copy of the site.css file for some reason. This way, pages
documentation.html, build_website.html and a couple of others look real
ugly. Could you please fix?
I've verified all other pages on the website, they look
PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] new Getting Started guides
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
Do you think it might be easier to use Wiki as storage for all FAQs
like
that for now? I mean, not all of those who help find FAQ entries have
Folks,
I have been wondering about the patches to the website and
documentation: could somebody please take a look and apply them if
they're ok? I mean, some patches have new info that can be important;
others improve our website and all. Why not just look into them? Thank
you very much.
for the website :(
Hi Nadya, I'll take a look.
Regards,
Tim
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Folks,
I have been wondering about the patches to the website and
documentation: could somebody please take a look and apply them if
they're ok? I mean, some patches have new info that can be important
site looks fine to me, so is there something I need to do to
preview properly?
Regards,
Tim
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Great to hear that.
Please let me know if you need any help.
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
to. I hope to grind through this all today.
geir
On Sep 21, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Folks,
I have been wondering about the patches to the website and
documentation: could somebody please take a look and apply them if
they're ok? I mean, some patches have new info
of that issue 'manually' so please check carefully that it was done
right. The live site may take a while to be updated.
Regards,
Tim
Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Tim,
I guess the issue is with the link to site.css that is in
harmony/site.
I have not been able to devise a nice way to preview
Geir,
Ok - it's clear I need to doc this.
This is a trigger phrase for me. We have README and Getting Started for
DRLVM that are terribly out-of-date. Now, if we update them, and keep
them up-to-date, Armand would not need to write to the mailing list but
would just follow the guide to
As I got it, the referenced documentation is created from code already,
so I don't quite get Geir's comment ;(
Anyway, I agree that keeping docs up-to-date is important. Do you think
we can ask the community to update comments with the code changes? This
way, the docs will never be out-of-sync.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
