SCRT definitely only reports the IBM sub-capacity products for which it is
programmed. No ISV products are reported by SCRT today.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:08:18 +
>
> I instead judge anyone who cannot read (and write) Roman numerals
> subliterate.
>
I expected no less of you. I can moderate my hyperbole: they're
a part of our culture; as such their teaching belongs in So
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Likewise, I consider teaching Roman numerals a waste of time.
I instead judge anyone who cannot read (and write) Roman numerals
subliterate.
John Gilmore
_
Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and
> Likewise, I consider teaching Roman numerals a waste of time.
At the risk of being OT, teaching other cultures that have led to ours is NOT a
waste of time.
Of course, I am a history buff.
And, I found I know about American history, than my ex (an American) did.
Knowledge is a good thing!
Ma
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Likewise, I consider teaching Roman numerals a waste of time.
Roman numerals are rife in our culture - just look at the
credits of any film or television program. I also recall a,
perhaps apocryphal, story about a Chicago edifice generally
referred to as the McMix build
Estaré ausente de la oficina desde el 19/02/2007 y no volveré hasta el
23/02/2007.
Responderé a su mensaje cuando regrese.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Brick
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM S/360 series operating systems history
You have also missed some small relatively insignificant OS's.
T
we have no problems, view 11.0 z/os 1.7 as of Jan 14
and we migrated first to view 11.0 under z/os 1.4 then a month later to z/os
1.7
we also tested all of this on our sand box system before migrating to
production.
Harold
- Original Message -
From: "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
i had summer student programming job ... developing 360 port of 1401
MPIO front-end
for 709 (univ. used 1401 for cardreader -> tape and tape ->
printer/pubnch front-end
for 709 ibsys). as part of move to 360 ...
So, you are the one! When I got to FNB Lubbock in th
I had not heard of TPS of DPS ( I dare say they were tape and disk
versiond of the card based BPS.)
As I recall BPS stood for Basic Programming Support, ( not System) As
an operator, I did use BPS ( comlete with 3 card loader!). Although
when I started, our installation was already converting f
>I think what we are hearing is that my earlier suggestion that "maybe the
>problem is your AP department" was not a red herring after all.
Maybe! Maybe not. Our company does NET-30, and our vendors accept that. And, of
the 15 we manage ourselves, rather than through our service provider, only 4
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:01:29 +, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Re. you saying:
> the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
> data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
>
Were you supposed to disclose that to someone who may no
Well, that makes me think my problem is our firewall. I'm still trying to
track down those guys to help me with this.
Brian
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:04:04 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:58:38 -0600, Brian Peterson wrote:
>
>>I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM su
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:58:38 -0600, Brian Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM support told me to check
>my firewall
>
>The error I'm getting is:
>
>GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILED.
> java.net.ConnectException:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 3:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Really, really weird problem with IBMLink - PTF ordering
>
>
> I'm having trouble with RE
I'm having trouble with RECEIVE ORDER today. IBM support told me to check
my firewall
The error I'm getting is:
GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILED.
java.net.ConnectException:
javax.net.ssl.SSLProtocolException: end
I have tried three times to order a set of PTFs. They are to support the
z9BC that we are planning to get (for z/OS 1.6). The first two times, I
ordered the PTFs from the PSP application. Both times, I got some
weird-*** VSE PTFs. The same set each time. OK, I figured that the link
from PSP to the
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:48:27 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
>
> Could you take a laptop with a wireless connection? Failing that, can
> you make the case for having either one PC dedicated to mainframe use
> and the Internet or at least one PC with Internet connection dedicated
> to mainframe. At le
In a message dated 2/19/2007 3:19:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where do you recover? Every place I know of has PC's for access in
the hot sites.
>>
Guess the 'big one' would be an EMP detonation. Probably maybe no internet
at all. The other one that comes t
Where do you recover? Every place I know of has PC's for access in
the hot sites.
Doug
snip>
>
>I don't really like email notification. For some reason, it rarely gets
>to me. And I do most of the key related maintenance. Again, CA does the
>best for this because I can get my
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are there?)
I have lived the pain, to the point of prod
Charles Mills wrote:
TOS/360, as noted above, is essentially the same as DOS/360.
Only if a tape is essentially the same as a disk!
TOS's code base was largely common with DOS, and the programming APIs were a
subset -- but the SYSRES was on tape! Believe it or not. The equivalent of
an S806 to
On 19 Feb 2007 09:40:41 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>David Cole wrote:
>
>> RPOs, POs and invoices are all necessary parts of the A-P process,
>> and the better a vendor understands, cooperates with and *assists* in
>> the process, the more often:
>>- The licensing will be ren
Hi Tom,
Re. you saying:
the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
De TRSMAIN homepage
http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/390/trsmain.html
which was last updated January 2006 already mentions u
See below...
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Does IBM custom build the IFAPRD** for each customer?
Yes. Every z/OS ServerPac or CBPDO order includes a custom-built
IFAPRDxx member.
Or are most products turned off, requiring the customer to activate those that
were licensed?
So far as I know, on
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:22:08 +0200, Binyamin Dissen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does IBM custom build the IFAPRD** for each customer?
>
>Or are most products turned off, requiring the customer to activate those that
>were licensed?
>
A sample IFAPRDxx comes pre-customized with ServerPac based on
On 19 Feb 2007 10:08:45 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
>7074. (36 bit word machine)
I think you mean 7040 (there may have been a 7044). The 707x series
was based on a 10 decimal digit word.
>
>There was an ear
On 19 Feb 2007 07:59:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
>> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:53 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: License keys for
I'm wondering the same thing. Customers send us SMF data routinely in Terse
format.
On 2/19/07, Frank Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did it not support before - ?
customers send me there smf data since years with trsmain .
So it is not new - or miss i something ?
Frank
--
Mark Pace
Mai
Did it not support before - ?
customers send me there smf data since years with trsmain .
So it is not new - or miss i something ?
Frank
From: Pinnacle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TRSMAIN now supports spanned records
FYI, the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data!
FYI, the new TRSMAIN supports spanned records so you can TERSE your SMF
data! Grab it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/s390/mvs/tools/packlib/
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:33:26 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/18/2007
:> at 08:54 AM, "Eric N. Bielefeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
:>>IFAPRDxx really isn't a key. You have to turn it on for each product
:>>to use it, but there is no
> TOS/360, as noted above, is essentially the same as DOS/360.
Only if a tape is essentially the same as a disk!
TOS's code base was largely common with DOS, and the programming APIs were a
subset -- but the SYSRES was on tape! Believe it or not. The equivalent of
an S806 took about ten minutes:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
02/18/2007
at 08:24 PM, Patrick Mulvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>MVS - Mainly missing clarification of the 1960-1972 period
>http://www.oshistory.net/metadot/index.pl?id=2238;isa=Category;op=show
There are some serious errors.
First, while OS/360 derived some conc
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/19/2007
at 06:22 PM, Ken Brick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Last DOS/VS R35 probably 1982 to be followed by the VSE series
>(probably when the 4331/4341 become available)
Yes; DOS/VSE was announced concurrently with ECPS:VSE, which was
initially only available on th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/18/2007
at 08:54 AM, "Eric N. Bielefeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>IFAPRDxx really isn't a key. You have to turn it on for each product
>to use it, but there is no key that only works on your CPU. I'm not
>sure just what IBM's reasoning behind IFAPRD is,
Pre
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
>
> Yes, I would say it is. A dozen eggs, a dozen doughnuts, etc.
But those entities usually come in a single container, with no explicit
"connection" between the term "dozen" and the quantity 12.
Consider
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:56:39 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
> >>
> >> [ snip ]
> >>
> >> Okay... another i
I think what we are hearing is that my earlier suggestion that "maybe the
problem is your AP department" was not a red herring after all.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:5
Getting OT here but my experience managing a SW company was that direct
deposit EASILY paid for itself by not having employees running to the bank
on payday. Let's say you pay someone $80K/year. That's roughly $40/hour, and
roughly $3077 per pay bi-weekly pay period.
30 minute run to the bank: $20
many thanks
On 2/19/07, Kirk Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you looked "__malloc24()" in the z/OS C++ Library reference manual?
Arie Kremer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE
&
> AMODE) may get a memory under the line without usin
Yes, I would say it is. A dozen eggs, a dozen doughnuts, etc.
But is "dozen" sufficiently prevalant that that it's necessarily
considered part of literacy?
Jon
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruction
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:56:39 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>>
>> [ snip ]
>>
>> Okay... another idea. Did someone change the JESLOG=NOSPIN
>> to SPIN for the execution class the job(s) ra
It depends on which FINDMOD. There are at at least 2, one of which is mine
(CBT FILE 434) that must run under ISPF in batch.
Example:
//FINDMOD JOB
//
//ALOCPROF EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Okay... another idea. Did someone change the JESLOG=NOSPIN
> to SPIN for the execution class the job(s) ran in?
No; JESLOG= is not specified at all, and the manual says the default is
N
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:47 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives
> are there?
>
>
> In a recent note, To
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:57:04 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>>
>> >[ snip ]
>> >
>> >We are at a loss to explain why this "segre
In a recent note, Tony Harminc said:
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:40:20 -0500
>
> I think a decoupling of the keys issue and the payments is called for, and
> indeed in the real world this happens much of the time.
>
IOW, the key is renewed whether you pay or not?
Perhaps the A-P policy
On 19 Feb 2007 10:40:52 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chase, John)
wrote:
>Indeed, that was the "main" reason cited by a former employer for
>refusing to implement "direct deposit" of payroll checks. They budgeted
>the projected interest they would earn during the "float" period between
>us cashing o
PRIVAT means it wants a scratch tape. The "-1" is really part of the
next line.
Eg "- 1 OFFLINE, NOT ACCESSABLE 0593" is really one message.
What is the UNITNAME in HSM set up like? Does it only include device
0593? That would be my first guess.
SETSYS
UNITNAME(TAPELIB5)
In HCD TAPELIB5 is
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Now as an ISV employee, I see many Fortune 500 companies that
> have A-P departments who, as a matter of policy, push the
> limits much further, and more often.
You could probably attr
In a recent note, Rick Fochtman said:
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:09:55 -0600
>
> Not to mention the intellectual paralytics coming from our public and
> private schools. Like a McDonalds clerk here that doesn't know "half a
> dozen" from six chicken McNuggets!
>
> A truly sorry state of
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:04:04 -0800, Michael Cleary
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Add Virtual SMF Records
>001 001 - Virtual APFLST
>001 002 - Virtual LNKLST
>001 003 - Virtual LOADPARM
>001 004 - Virtual LPALST
>001 005 - Virtual Master Catalog
>001 006 - Virtual PAGE
>00
It is very posssible that despite the fact that there appears to be several
drives available, they may really be allocated to someone who has specified
unit=(tape,,defer) This would allocate a drive but defer a mount until open
is issued. Just because you don;t see a tape on it, doesn't mean it'
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:15 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM recycle puzzle
>
>
> For a few weeks now I have had a problem with my HSM RECYCLE ML2
>
> F
My apologies to Kirk Talman for rechristening him Kurt without
authlorization.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_
Mortgage rates as low as 4.625% - Refinance $150,000 loan for $579 a month.
Intro*Terms http://www.NexTag.co
Kurt Talman wrote:
IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
7074. (36 bit word machine)
There was an early version(s) of OS that ran on the 7094.
Two corrections:
o Strike IBM 7070 and 7074; they were very different, business not
scientific machines; and
For a few weeks now I have had a problem with my HSM RECYCLE ML2
F HSM,RECYCLE ML2EXECUTE
ARC0830I RECYCLE COMMAND PROCESSING STARTING
IEF244I HSM HSM - UNABLE TO ALLOCATE 1 UNIT(S) 300
AT LEAST 1 OFFLINE UNIT(S) NEEDED.
IEF877E HSM NEEDS 1 UNIT(S) 301
FOR HSM SYS41934
FOR VOLUME PRIVA
IBSYS was the operating system of the IBM 7094 and probably the 7090 7070
7074. (36 bit word machine)
There was an early version(s) of OS that ran on the 7094.
The original "production" version of OS was PCP (primary control
program?). It was used on the 360/75 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jon, I agree with you. CA's license key method is about as painless
as I have seen.
One gripe I have is with a different vendor, (SAS, are you listening?).
I got my SAS key and applied it to my production LPAR but got busy and
forgot to apply it to the sandbox. Several months later I needed
On 19 Feb 2007 09:30:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John)
wrote:
>> Since we all are "products of our environments", it's "obviously"
>> somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
>>
>> .About that Mojave Beachfront property I'
Arie Kremer wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE &
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any assembler code?
In Systems/C - you can do it with a call to the __malloc24() function.
- Dave Rivers -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Cole wrote:
> RPOs, POs and invoices are all necessary parts of the A-P process,
> and the better a vendor understands, cooperates with and *assists* in
> the process, the more often:
>- The licensing will be renewed on time,
>- Payment will be made on time,
>- And licensing ke
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 11:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IBM Sued
>
>
> --
> Since we all are "products of our
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2096588,00.asp
Opinion: Despite having long since lost its "star" status in the view
of many IT watchers, the mainframe is showing continued growth and is
beginning to claim a new generation of users.
I try to stay away from clichés. But try as you mig
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Zelden
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:35 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives are
there?)
>
> John,
>
> We migrated to the
--
Since we all are "products of our environments", it's "obviously"
somebody else's fault whenever we do something wrong.
.About that Mojave Beachfront property I've got for
sale...
-
Here is the JCL I have used before.
//*
//TSO EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SHOWMVS DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
PR
---
Considering the emotional cripples I see turned out of the "elite and
prestigious" all girls Catholic school my wife teaches at, it is no
wonder that this nonsense is prevalent.
--
Not to mention the int
This is where Charles' idea shows merit. A unified license key scheme could
avoid some of the pain associated with the subject.
Jon
If we only dealt with 1 ISV, then we'd have few, perhaps no, problems
too. But we deal with (at the last count) 57 ISVs, who supply us with
several hundred produ
If we only dealt with 1 ISV, then we'd have few, perhaps no, problems
too. But we deal with (at the last count) 57 ISVs, who supply us with
several hundred products. Each ISV has it's idiosyncracies, some don't
use keys at all, some are very easy to contact and deal with, some
others are less so. I
Hi,
Something cool I learned at SHARE. I didn't notice this as we have been
using Thruput Manager to replace the Mellon Mods functionality for a
long time but there is some interesting "useful" function in some recent
JES2 sample exits. Look at SYS1.SHASSAMP members HASX54A, HASX04A,
HASX20B, HAS
We have VIEW R11 running on our 1.8 system.
If I put an S beside the jobname I get it all in one file. If I put a ?
I get the individual pieces - just like SDSF does.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Mon
Dave Cole writes emails as well as he writes software. But a small
reinforcement.
> Trust?
A while back I worked for an ISV and was responsible for the "code
program" for what was then the number one product on both total sales and
velocity for the company. A Very Large Computer User (VLCU)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:53 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products(What alternatives
> are there?)
>
>
> In a recent note, "S
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
>
> >[ snip ]
> >
> >We are at a loss to explain why this "segregation" of "jcl stuff"
into
> >separate CA-View members is occurring. We underst
From: Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But I think you are correct about the SERNO field. I have a tool which
> can modify the field, so I will try to run a test.
This is how the VTOCIX was listed using IEHLIST:
-DATA SET NAME--- CREATED DATE.EXP FILE TYPE SMS.IND EXT DS.VOL1
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:40:13 -0500
>
> >It might help if the installation process prompted for an E-mail
> >address of contact to notify automatically prior to expiry. Less
> >help on z/OS than on other systems, because z/OS has les
I realize this is heresy, but I like the way CA does it. Parts of it, anyway.
We get warnings before a key expires. Once we get a new key, we add it to our
options file in Common Services (formerly CA-90's, etc.) and rerun CAS9 -- no
pain, no downtime.
I have no problem with vendor implement
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, All,
>
>Yesterday we rolled out z/OS 1.7 to a Production LPAR previously running
>z/OS 1.5, and have noticed a change in the archiving of batch job output
>in CA-View. With 1.5, all "jcl-type" output (JESMSGLG, JESJCL
In a recent note, Dave Salt said:
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:24:44 +
>
> In an edit session, enter EDSET on the command line. You'll see a panel with
>
Thanks! Works great for Edit and View.
And an unexpected bonus: I see I can turn off "Confirm Cancel".
And everything sticks be
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:02:38 -0500, Reda, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We offer multiple ways for the customer to install and maintain their
license keys. The recommended method is having the keys in a sequential
data set. This way modifications to the license keys can be as easy as
updatin
Hi, All,
Yesterday we rolled out z/OS 1.7 to a Production LPAR previously running
z/OS 1.5, and have noticed a change in the archiving of batch job output
in CA-View. With 1.5, all "jcl-type" output (JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG
together with SYSPRINT, SYSOUT, etc.) was archived in CA-View as a
sin
Anyone out there using EMC disks and managing the mirroring with GDPS?
We are about to migrate away from IBM ESS Disks managed by GDPS to EMC
DMX3000 disks managed by GDPS. We are told it works as the DMX emulates
PPRC but we are interested in anyone who is actually doing it.
Peter Gammage
S
Beware, many FDA regulated companies must keep SMF records for many,
many years.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the a
In a message dated 2/19/2007 8:02:36 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That doesn't solve the problem for either the customer or the vendor.
Consider DR.
>>
Seems like if RSA cards are portable between cell phones should be able to
specify a backup decoder ring-wavin
well, given the current state of affairs, why should we expect kids to have
any accountability whatsoever?
After all, they see their parents getting the shaft at work by corporate
america that sends jobs overseas without a second thought, without giving a
about the american worker, yea, t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 12:24 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: License keys for ISV products
>
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> on 02/16/2007
>
Have you looked "__malloc24()" in the z/OS C++ Library reference manual?
Arie Kremer wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know whether C routine running above the line (both RMODE &
AMODE) may get a memory under the line without using any assembler code?
---
My wife went from a DR Coordinator to a math teacher. You would not
be wondering about this if you heard what is going on in the schools.
No accountability at all. No responsibility, it is always someone
else's fault, or it's "not fair." Considering the emotional cripples
I see turned out of th
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 02/16/2007
at 03:00 PM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>CA's EKG code for disaster testing is fairly nice.
The code may be nice, but that doesn't help if you can't get a new key
in a timely fashion. Have they fixed the problems that they were
having half a
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/16/2007
at 01:54 PM, Ed Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Is there a better procedure than this for dealing with the flood,
Do E K,1 one time and then use the retry key. It's still a lot of
typing, but it eliminates some keystrokes and doesn't make you
redefine a PF
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/17/2007
at 06:52 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>It might help if the installation process prompted for an E-mail
>address of contact to notify automatically prior to expiry. Less
>help on z/OS than on other systems, because z/OS has less consistent
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/17/2007
at 10:40 AM, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>We jointly discovered that our common distributor had stolen tens of
>thousands of dollars from us
>Was it Ronald Reagan who said "trust, but verify"?
He quoted an old Russian saying.
>Even if a more
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/16/2007
at 04:22 PM, Bruno Sugliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>But we don't care ( sorry about that ) about the sharks robbing the
>poor salesmen
I wouldn't go that far. I certainly care more about being able to use
the software I pay for than I do with whether so
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/17/2007
at 07:27 AM, David Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>From a user's perspective, if the ISV is timely in his delivery of
>license keys, why is it a big deal?
That's the wrong question. How can the user *know* that the ISV will
*always* be timely in his deliver
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/17/2007
at 11:41 AM, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>The silver bullet would be a magic decoder ring on the HMC that says
>this can run and this can't.
That doesn't solve the problem for either the customer or the vendor.
Consider DR.
--
Shmuel (Seym
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/17/2007
at 04:18 PM, Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Ted, if you haven't gotten why the trust model is inadequate from my
>past posts, and David Cole's, and Dave Salt's, and Russell Witt's,
>then my explaining it again probably won't do the trick either.
Jan
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jan Vanbrabant
Sent: 19 February 2007 02:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: zLinux listserver?
Hi,
Is there a separ
Hi,
Is there a separate zLinux listserver or forum at your knowledge?
We are going to start investigating DB2 Connect on z/Linux IFL.
Jan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROT
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
