Hi all
There isn't any Couple facility in our shop.it was monoplex configuration
Could we define ARM Couple datasesr and OMVS Couple dataset in our shop?
If ARM couple dataset could be defined,we could define some arm police to
restart some Adderspaces when they abend.If it cann't be
Tim, Depending what you want to do and which records, one option could be to
use the Report Generator - Option G under ISMF.
It uses assembler mapping macros to help drive creation of reports based on
ICETOOL. Prior to this life it was the DFSMSrmm report generator.
Mike Wood RMM Development
I wonder if I could get a button that says that to wear.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
On 30/11/2010 6:12 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
That was not payroll. That was a bank. They screwed up all
transactions for a week after a conversion and fallback. I would be
really curious as to how the database was functioning without crashing
while processing all those bad transactions.
Almost
IIRC there is a field which has the timestamp of when the current step
started, but I cannot seem to find it.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response
Assuming there are sufficient CF connections, I see no issue.
snip
We are in the process of upgrading from a z900 to a Z9. Bothr CECs
contain a
Production CF LPAR, Production and Development LPAR. The second CEC also
contains 2 Sandbox CF LPARs and 2 Sandbox LPARs.
We want to move 1 Sandbox CF
On 11/30/2010 12:52 AM, Stephen Mednick wrote:
One wonders if a detailed explanation of what transpired will be forthcoming
as was the case back in July when the DBS Bank in Singapore had a major
outage.
http://www.dbs.com/newsroom/2010/press100804.aspx
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory
A detailed explanation would be nice. The way this article reads it's
the mainframe that's at fault. As though this wouldn't have happened
if the platform had been something other than the mainframe. However,
I'd bet that the upgrade was to the application system, not the
mainframe, and
1) Yes you can define these files and policies. A CF is not needed for
this.
2) an OMVS couple dataset would only be needed if there are multiple
images sharing HFS/ZFS files, See the Setting up a SYSPLEX books (I
believe this is a redbook)
HTH,
snip
There isn't any Couple facility in our
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005d5e05...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 11/29/2010
at 09:57 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Each to his own. I prefer the human touch on password resets. But
I'm an old paranoid grin. In my arrogance, somebody who cannot
remember their RACF
In bay145-w49ec5da03c965718368930a3...@phx.gbl, on 11/29/2010
at 11:44 AM, J R jayare...@hotmail.com said:
He also omitted Exclusive Or (XR 15,15),
The quoted text is in your reply:
There were three possible instructions that could be used to
zero R15: ``Clear Register R15'', ``Subtract
In listserv%201011300054096099.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 11/30/2010
at 12:54 AM, Sheldon Davis sda...@isracard.co.il said:
I would love to know how a corrupt system file in a parrallel sysplex
can affect a payroll system
Why? That's not what the article claims. a corrupted file on an IBM
we want to have everyone login securely and we were at pcomm5.7.
I have loaded pcom5.9 tired to login but it is failing with caveats
I get the inital login screen
1) when I try to login to tso in get a prog723. The log shows:
IKT112I SENDERROR DURING QUERY PROCESSING FOR TSO0011 ,
Larry,
you should upgrade to 6.0 and not 5.9. We tested 5.9 when switching to
secure-sessions and had some problems. They are fixed in 6.0. It runs now
without any problems.
Juergen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Thank you Juergen, but there is a problem with our contract at the moment
and the best we can do is 5.9 with fixes.
We can not even login unsecure to tso.
Thanks
Larry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
At 17:55 -0500 on 11/29/2010, J R wrote about Re: IEFBR14:
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:08:33 +
From: bi...@mainstar.com
Subject: Re: IEFBR14
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
He meant three possible instructions that only occupied two
bytes of storage, I believe (All three required the
We had a situation where our M204 users reported a delay but CMF shows the main
delay as CPU but at a relatively low %.
Question - Does CMF only report CPU delay for the Logical Processors in that
particular LPAR?
The LPAR is question often shows CPU usage of 90+%, while the CMF LPARSTAR view
O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote in
message
news:cd22aa1aee707d489d9250d13e3862a18593711...@nihmlbxcms02.nih.gov..
.
We had a situation where our M204 users reported a delay but CMF shows
the main delay as CPU but at a relatively low %.
Question - Does CMF only
On 29 Nov 2010 08:43:23 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I would tend to agree with ' they violate our standards and are sharing ids'.
Security is not priority one in some other countries. (At least not OUR
security).
Security is not that high a priority in many organizations where
Hi Kees,
3 physical CPs
2 Prod LPARs each with 3 LPs
1 Test LPAR with 2 LPs
1 Sandbox with 1 LP
So we have 9 LPs competing for 3 CPs. Fortunately 3 of those LPs are little
used.
The relative weights of the Prod LPARs are 45 and 30.
The LPAR reporting the problem is the one with 30, no surprise
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: A New Threat for password hacking
On 29 Nov 2010 08:43:23 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
Similar calculation: the lpar uses 90% of its allocated resources, which
is 35-45% of the machine as being distributed by pr/sm based on weigths
and Lpar demands.
I see this in our test lpars: they are 90-100% busy, yet use 10% of the
machine according to weights if demand by other Lpars is
I'd bet that the upgrade was to the application system, not the mainframe, and
something was wrong in a new application program that corrupted the file.
I wouldn't take the opposite of that bet!
I'm wondering why it took 5 days to recover.
Since, upon reading the article, I see that INFOSYS
Back to my original question, if LPARa has a weight of 30 and is 100% busy but
is only getting 50% physical then the CPU delay % should be 50%. However CMF is
reporting 2-3% which leads me to conclude that CMF is only computing wait for
Logical Processors within the LPAR.
Thank You,
Dave
Larry
This may help:
PROG723 error on IBM Personal Communications 3270 Telnet session
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21251200
Note the relevant Software versions
Why CICS works and TSO doesn't would still be a mystery however!
Chris Mason
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:52:11
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
Larry
This may help:
PROG723 error on IBM Personal Communications 3270 Telnet session
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21251200
Note the relevant Software versions
Why CICS
Thanks Mike for the answer.
Regards,
Srinivas G
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Z10 BC issue
You init a volume on the new
Hello all,
Just remember that I'm not z/OS literate,
but...
We just implemented a VTS from SecureAgent
and now when running HSM backups it seems
to be putting each DASD volume backed up
to a separate VTS tape. Does anyone have
any ideas what might be causing this or
what I should look at?
Hi,
On the Z800 , we had a separate 2074 controller for SNA Connectivity. In the
Z10BC , I understand , its integrated into the HMC. How do I configure the same
for an LPAR? Is there documentation that describes it? I have looked everywhere
but could not find it. Any pointers?
Regards,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:39:16 -0600, Billy R. Bingham
billy.bingham...@suddenlink.net wrote:
Hello all,
Just remember that I'm not z/OS literate,
but...
We just implemented a VTS from SecureAgent
and now when running HSM backups it seems
to be putting each DASD volume backed up
to a separate VTS
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:12:32 +0530, SrinivasG sriniv...@infosys.com wrote:
Hi,
On the Z800 , we had a separate 2074 controller for SNA Connectivity. In
the Z10BC , I understand , its integrated into the HMC. How do I configure
the same for an LPAR? Is there documentation that describes it? I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of SrinivasG
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Z10 BC SNA Console
Hi,
On the Z800 , we had a separate 2074 controller for SNA
John
We haven't been given either the configuration much less the relevant
definitions here but you may be getting close to the explanation to why CICS
works and TSO doesn't.
After I mentioned mystery here I went back to close the window for the
Technote and noticed that the problem arises
Take a look at your DFHSM ARCCMDxx member ... the parameter MARKFULL comes
to mind, as a setting to indicate if a DFHSM tape should be marked as full
at the conclusion of a DFHSM function or if it should be kept available for
another function to add more data later.
Also make sure that VTS
All,
Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using
NJE.Issue is transferring output between two different MAS-plex of
the same node-name. NJE would work if multi-hopped, NODE-A connected to
NODE-B, NODE-B connected to NODE-C, and finally NODE-C connects to the
other
Joel,
We finally found the reason to this problem. There is an exit placed so as to
prevent certain HLQ qualifiers migration to ML1 from ML0. This exit was placed
by the customer in the ARCMD9 parmlib. I was convinced that there was a
problem with the Management Class settings. I am
1. NJE over TCP would result in one hop (assuming IP connectivity between the
two MASs)
2. If it's a one-time exercise, can you do a spool unload/reload?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:09 -0500, Jousma, David wrote:
Looking for ideas for doing spool to spool transfer of output NOT using
NJE.
Maybe Sine Nomine's NJE/IP Bridge package would be useful here?
http://www.sinenomine.net/products/vm/njeip
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:35 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
Hi Kees,
3 physical CPs
2 Prod LPARs each with 3 LPs
1 Test LPAR with 2 LPs
1 Sandbox with 1 LP
So we have 9 LPs competing for 3 CPs. Fortunately 3 of those LPs are little
used.
The relative
Doesn't NJE over IP have the same restrictions as standard NJE of
connecting two nodes of the same name?
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD
Doesn't NJE over IP have the same restrictions as standard NJE of
connecting two nodes of the same name?
I overlooked that detail. You should be able to use a node number as long as
they are different.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
Node number is the same too.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.8497
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Assuming that CMF works the same as RMF, yes, the CPU delay % indicates the
% of samples taken where the workload was waiting to use a LP. This
calculation has no visibility to the physical CPs.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:51 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
Tiering within the array is the best approach with replication. Synchronous
or Asynchronous, Tiering within the array provides better consistent point
at the recovery site.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Ron Hawkins ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net
wrote:
Techie well wisher,
Thanks
Have sysout transfered--NJE--from an AS400 ... the OWNER filed shows
Where would this default becoming from..and can it be altered?
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to
Have sysout transfered--NJE--from an AS400 ... the OWNER filed shows
Where would this default becoming from..and can it be altered?
If you have RACF then I think it is the RACLNODE definitions for sysout.
Though I could be wrong.
Lizette
Thanks Mike, I was thinking that it might be better to consolidate the 2 Prod
LPARs so that all of the workload operated under the same WLM policy without
the PRSM time slice.
But that's not my call.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Mike
Thanks Scott, That's what I thought but couldn't find documented.
Thank You,
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: Scott Rowe [scott.r...@joann.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question concerning CMF
this is in z/os racf??ask racf guy...unsure where it maybe...
From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 11/30/2010 01:07 PM
Subject:Re: SDSF display sysout
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Have sysout
The value is set via SETROPTS NJEUNKNOWN. It represents the
non-ownership of NJE jobs and sysout. It can not be set to an actual RACF
UserID or group.
RACFVARS RACLNDE - is a bypass of translation. Putting a JES (or RSCS)
node in RACLNDE prevents any substitution of NJE information.
--- On Mon, 11/29/10, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
From: McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Subject: Re: A New Threat for password hacking
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Monday, November 29, 2010, 9:57 AM
Each to his own. I prefer the human touch on password resets.
Could the answer be this partial quote from Chapter 10 of the Implementation
and Customization manual:
Initial and Subsequent Selection of Dump Tapes
Because dump processing always selects an empty tape
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]
Hayim thanks...racf person looking into it
From: Hayim Sokolsky hsokol...@dtcc.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 11/30/2010 01:27 PM
Subject:Re: SDSF display sysout
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
The value is set via
Hello,
Iff you have OSA-E 1000BaseT look for in redbook site for OSA-ICC. It
describes step by step how to configure it.
Carlos Bodra
IBM zSeries Certified Specialist
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Em 30/11/2010 15:42, SrinivasG escreveu:
Hi,
On the Z800 , we had a separate 2074
Our Mainframe Batch job is successful using a Test Userid and Password to
SSH to a remote host using password authentication (via askpass). When we
try the same job with the Production Userid and Password, we receive the
following error: “FOTS1346 Permission denied, please try again”. This
We've recently installed an HDS MDL. In the course of the installation,
we decided we wanted to stage things so that down the road we can do
remote replication of tape. Basically we don't intend to replicate the
entire library - we'll replicate tapes which have been identified as
needing
It might be easier to see if you'd post the JCL and SYSIN type input for the
failing step. Does the production RACF id have an OMVS segment? Does it have a
HOME subdirectory? Is there a .ssh subdirectory in the $HOME for this user? Is
the UNIX filemode for .ssh subdirectory set to 700 or 600?
Does the production RACF id have an OMVS segment? Yes
Does it have a HOME subdirectory? Yes
Is there a .ssh subdirectory in the $HOME for this user? Yes
Is the UNIX filemode for .ssh subdirectory set to 700 or 600? Set to 770
Are the files in the .ssh subdirectory all set to filemode 600?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Billy R. Bingham
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: HSM and SA VTS
Hello all,
Just remember that I'm not z/OS literate,
but...
We just
Leonard,
Were you successful using your test userid using SSH_ASKPASS along with the
-b option?
If you have your askpass script write something to stderr, you may find that
it is not being called.
This is because the -b file switch enables -oBatchMode=yes, which
disables SSH_ASKPASS.
But if you
Well, the 770 on .ssh doesn't seem right to me, but I haven't looked at the
OpenSSH source code.
http://www.openssh.org/faq.html
quote
3.14 - I copied my public key to authorized_keys but public-key authentication
still doesn't work.
Typically this is caused by the file permissions on $HOME,
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:32:48 -0500, Leonard Sasso wrote:
Does the production RACF id have an OMVS segment? Yes
Does it have a HOME subdirectory? Yes
Is there a .ssh subdirectory in the $HOME for this user? Yes
Is the UNIX filemode for .ssh subdirectory set to 700 or 600? Set to 770
Are the
I agree its not a bad thing. If we don't
find why this is happening for the VTS and
not for real tapes we will just have to
define more virtual VOLSERs in the VTS.
Thanks for all the replys.
Billy
On 30 Nov 2010 at 13:33, Gibney, Dave
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Is the production Userid defined to the remote system?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Leonard Sasso
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 2:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: “FOTS1346 Permission denied, please try
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Darth Keller darth.kel...@assurant.com wrote:
We've recently installed an HDS MDL. In the course of the installation,
we decided we wanted to stage things so that down the road we can do
remote replication of tape. Basically we don't intend to replicate the
Gil is correct. Even though you aren't using keys, OpenSSH will try to
cache a prng in .ssh, so it should be 700.
Best to stay with these recommendations for file permissions:
http://dovetail.com/docs/sftp/sftp-webinar.pdf slide 29 Common
Pitfalls
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
Kirk:
We were successful using our Test Userid using SSH_ASKPASS along with the
-b option.
We have BatchMode no in our custom ssh_config file.
-vvv log contents:
OpenSSH_3.8.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004
debug1: Reading configuration data /u/home/lsasso/.ssh/PConfg
debug3: Seeding PRNG
Changed the directory and file permissions, received the same error
messages.
Thank You.
Len Sasso
RDC Operations - Systems Administrator
CSC
Information Technology Infrastructure Services (ITIS)
| p: 518.257-4209 | m: 518.894-0879 | f: 518.257-4300 | lsa...@csc.com |
www.csc.com
This is
From the trace it looks like a password packet is being sent to the remote
system and is being rejected.
Can you logon to the same target system and userid from an interactive sftp
client? Make sure that you use the same case in both the userid and
password. If so, then perhaps there is a
As if.
Can't you just imagine a major Aussie Bank doing that. You were at Bank
of NSW when they had the IMS fiasco Steve - how much info on that got
out ? (via Bank press releases I mean :-)
Shane ...
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:52:08 +1100
Stephen Mednick wrote:
One wonders if a detailed
Darth,
Are both devices 841C and 8401 inside the same MDL and managed as part of
the same Storage Group? The problem with CA-1 subpooling and most
robotic/virtual libraries is that tapes are not mounted based on the
TMS001/TMS002 mount messages, but instead based on their own rules. Now, a
BTLS
Hi,
Following is the allocation for one of our DB datasets...
DSN=PROD.OSAM.DATASET
DISP=(,CATLG),
DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=8192,BLKSIZE=8192),
VOL=SER=(VOL1,VOL2,VOL3),
SPACE=(CYL,(2500,400))
The three volumes, VOL1, VOL2 and
Some information from a close source...
It was a plain old S0C7 during their batch process.
All Aussie banks use Cemtex ABA format which has been around for years
as a transfer format between organisations. You would think that there
is a validate step before running the transactions against
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
Some information from a close source...
It was a plain old S0C7 during their batch process.
All Aussie banks use Cemtex ABA format which has been around for years
as a transfer format between organisations. You would
I'm way out of my league now, so this is just speculation on my part.
But did your test sftp go to the same site and user at that site? I just
wonder if it is possible if the problem is at the far end. I really
don't know, I'm just musing out loud.
I am at home on my Linux system. Where I have a
Staller
Thank you very much!
ARM Couple datasesr and OMVS Couple dataset?
1) Yes you can define these files and policies. A CF is not needed for
this.
2) an OMVS couple dataset would only be needed if there are multiple
images sharing HFS/ZFS files, See the Setting up a SYSPLEX books (I
Hi,
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to run
disabled does the
SAM64 instruction do that
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
On 11/30/2010 7:40 PM, michealbutz wrote:
Hi,
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to run
disabled does the
SAM64 instruction do that
It's not what we know that hurts us - it's what we know that ain't so.
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:40 PM, michealbutz michealb...@optonline.netwrote:
Hi,
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to run
disabled does the
SAM64 instruction do that
From my understanding, a problem state program can run in AMODE 64. I don't
think it is a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:40 PM, michealbutz michealb...@optonline.netwrote:
Hi,
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to run
disabled does the
SAM64 instruction do that
From my understanding, a problem state program can run in AMODE 64. I don't
think it is a
If you were disabled it wouldn't be a very practical way to maintain data
buffers.
No, you don't have to be authorized, nor disabled.
From what I understand running in 64 bit mode (SAM64) you have to run
disabled does the
SAM64 instruction do that
How would you branch to code above the 2GB bar, since none is allowed there?
The obvious problem being how you would even get it loaded up there. If I
recall, the fundamental problem is that the PSW cannot be saved with an
address greater than 31-bit for the next instruction since neither the
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
deleted
My same source related the tale of a person in same bank who received
an EBCDIC file, opened it in Windows and saved it back as ASCII. The
file was duly transferred for processing on the mainframe. Most of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
As if.
Can't you just imagine a major Aussie Bank doing that. You were at
Bank
of NSW when they had the IMS fiasco Steve - how much info on that got
out ? (via Bank press releases I mean :-)
Yeh It's
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
As if.
Can't you just imagine a major Aussie Bank doing that. You were at
Bank
of NSW when they had the IMS fiasco Steve - how much
I will be out of the office starting 11/30/2010 and will not return until
12/01/2010.
I will be out of the office Tuesday (Nov 30). I will return on Wednesday
(Dec 1). Thanks.
HCSC Company Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
proprietary, or
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Gerhard Adam gada...@charter.net wrote:
How would you branch to code above the 2GB bar, since none is allowed
there?
The obvious problem being how you would even get it loaded up there. If I
recall, the fundamental problem is that the PSW cannot be saved with
Mike Schwab wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
deleted
My same source related the tale of a person in same bank who received
an EBCDIC file, opened it in Windows and saved it back as ASCII. The
file was duly transferred for processing on the
A comment here:-
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/human-error-triggered-nab-
software-corruption/story-e6frgakx-1225962953523
The file was actually software code containing instructions on how systems
should operate in the batch processing cycle.
would lead me to think someone
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:09:00 -0600, Chris Craddock wrote:
However, if you were imagining you would be executing code that was above
4GiB, then forget it. z/OS doesn't support it at all. Even if you
could somehow conspire to get some code into storage above the bar, you
would not (in general) be
O'Brien, David W. [C] , NIH/CIT obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote in
message
news:cd22aa1aee707d489d9250d13e3862a18593711...@nihmlbxcms02.nih.gov..
.
Thanks Mike, I was thinking that it might be better to consolidate the
2 Prod LPARs so that all of the workload operated under the same WLM
policy
91 matches
Mail list logo
