Hello All -
After much deliberation the jQuery team has decided to close down the
Google Groups that we've been using for project discussion and move to
a unified forum instead.
The new forum can be found here:
http://forum.jquery.com/
More information about our decision to move can be found her
More details here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/12/04/jquery-14-alpha-1-released/
--John
jQuery does not support :target. The only reason why it works in Firefox 3.5
is that it provides a native querySelectorAll method. We would have to have
an implementation that works in other browser (FF 3.0, IE 8, etc.) and we
don't have that right now. You're welcome to file a ticket asking for
:t
That sounds about right - hopefully we'll be able to direct them to a forum,
eventually (which would be much easier to use, I'd expect, for someone who's
using twitter).
--John
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Mike Alsup wrote:
>
> Over the past few months I've been fielding an increasing numb
We just landed some code in the latest nightly versions of jQuery to
auto-detect if the page has already loaded. You can try it here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js
--John
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, ujamu wrote:
>
> I have developed a FF extension that loads a few JavaScript fi
this?
>
> Thanks,
> Shane
>
> On Aug 12, 11:50 am, John Resig wrote:
> > It looks similar to the one above, but different. I'll try and check in
> to
> > them both.
> >
> > gentry - can you file a bug for the issue you found, preferably with a
&g
It looks similar to the one above, but different. I'll try and check in to
them both.
gentry - can you file a bug for the issue you found, preferably with a full
test case?
--John
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Jeffrey Kretz wrote:
>
> My guess is its related to a problem I ran into with the
These are a duplicate of http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4512 which has been
fixed.
--John
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Mondo Libero wrote:
>
> Here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4753, and Here:
> http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4960
> some users send this bug on bug tracker. The example are almo
Just remove the @ and it'll work fine.
--John
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, micorreo13 wrote:
>
> I was using jquery-1.2.6 and now, I started to use jquery-1.3.2, and I
> get my first "difference": when I use the wrapped set operation $
> (':inp...@name=submit]') with jquery-1.3.2 it return
How many times is clickcharges called? Perhaps you're binding a click more
than once.
--John
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:03 PM, marksimon wrote:
>
> Still getting 2 alerts.
>
> On Jul 29, 11:49 am, Eric Garside wrote:
> > Pretty sure its because the event is bubbling up. Try:
> >
> > $('#cardcha
It looks like you're using the old liveQuery plugin. Why not just use
.bind() or .live()?
--John
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:11 PM, pedalpete wrote:
>
> So, this isn't related to any one bit of code, but it seems to be a
> problem I run into almost everytime i need to stop a form or link for
> d
All messages are moderated - so it'll depend heavily upon when we're able to
review them.
--John
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Cesar Sanz wrote:
>
> I takes about 3 hrs to display your first message. dunno why
>
> - Original Message - From: "Jon Jackson"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, July
It looks like it may have already been fixed:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496790
Thanks for the heads-up, though!
--John
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:09 PM, benjam wrote:
>
> I'm sure support for a beta release is a bad thing to be asking for,
> but I mostly just want to make sur
Well, in 1.3.2 it now throws an exception, since the CSS selector "#" is
invalid. If you wish to use that precise technique I'd wrap a try/catch
around the jQuery statement to catch the error.
--John
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:22 AM, madmax019 wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have the following pro
Could you try it with an unminified version of jQuery? That might help a
little bit with debugging.
--John
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Devision wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I recently updated my jQuery to 1.3.2 from 1.2.6 and now firebug shows
> me error: tagName is undefined (jquery.js line 12
Do you have Firebug installed? Some versions of Firebug submit requests
twice.
--John
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Josh Ain wrote:
> Very intermittently, I am finding ajax requests submitted with jquery are
> being submitted twice, once with parameters, and once without parameters.
> The c
Upgrading is probably safe - it's the engine that'll be in jQuery 1.3.3.
--John
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 AM, swalke16 wrote:
>
> I have a situation where I have some HTML I am selecting elements from
> using the ".class tag" selector combination using jQuery v1.3.2. I
> have noticed that i
Interesting. Do you think you could file a bug on this and then post it to
the jQuery-dev list? Thanks!
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, giovanni wrote:
>
> I found that certain selectors work in all browsers exc
return false does e.preventDefault() and e.stopPropagation().
--John
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, kgosser wrote:
>
> Just curious if there is a best practice when choosing between
>
> $("a").click(function(){
> // stuff
> return false;
> });
>
> and
>
> $("a").click(function(){
> //
}
> else
> {
> //display message
> $("#answer_"+current).html($("message",xml).text());
> }
> }
>
> I place alert screens for debugging, the
Well, without being able to see the form in question - does your page
validate? If everything is going into a single input that sounds like
a problem with malformed HTML markup.
--John
2009/3/30 Kathryn :
>
> I'm working on a web form and had to upgrade to 1.3.2 tonight to solve
> some problem
Why not just use a nightly build? No need to wait for a full release.
http://code.jquery.com/nightlies/jquery-2009-03-26.js
--John
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:03 AM, dberthia wrote:
>
> Anybody have any insight into when 1.3.3 might be released? There are
> a couple of bugs that are wreaking ha
gt;
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:28 PM, John Resig wrote:
>>
>> Uhhh... why were there like 30 of these submitted to the mailing list?
>> Your email address has now been banned. Please contact me off-list if
>> you wish to rectify the situation.
>>
>> --John
>
>
Uhhh... why were there like 30 of these submitted to the mailing list?
Your email address has now been banned. Please contact me off-list if
you wish to rectify the situation.
--John
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:45 PM, InfiniteSkills Support Center
wrote:
>
> This message is to notify you that y
Why not do:
$('#first').click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); });
--John
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> I have 2 containers
>
> i disabled event bubbling for first container. This is must have $
> ('#first').click(function() { return false; });
>
> Now i need to dete
If I remember correctly - the NetFront browser was missing some fairly
fundamental features. I don't remember which, off-hand, but it was enough to
cause jQuery not even to load.
--John
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Johan wrote:
>
> jQuery fails on the Playstation 3 browser. Yeah I know the
r that the animate function was ignoring
> the ‘%’ sign and was just applying ‘-26px’ instead.
>
>
>
> After positing this directly to John Resig via twitter I got a response
> asking me to try:
>
>
>
> $(‘#myDiv’).animate({top : “-=26%”});
>
>
>
> Howeve
> The benchmark is getElementById().getElementsByTagName() - why not
> inlcude that in the test?
But it's not that simple (it never is). That code doesn't take into
account browsers, like IE, returning element that have a name equal to
the ID, not does it take into account the element (with the I
omorrow morning, as well.
Thanks for these tests - it's stuff that I've been meaning to get
around to for a while now but it's good to have some easy-to-spot
targets.
--John
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:21 PM, John Resig wrote:
>> WOW! Check out the last 2 tests, John
> WOW! Check out the last 2 tests, John. Syntax #4 takes 512-times
> longer than #5! I think this code needs a little TLC too ;)
>
> It was also interesting that $("#div500").children("p") is 10-times
> slower than $("#div500").find("p"). So I added one final test using
> childNodes and filter() t
To follow-up from my post yesterday, here are the new numbers, for
1.3.3 (work in progress, naturally):
http://ejohn.org/files/jquery1.3.3/id.html
jQuery version used = 1.3.3pre
Total number of DIVs = 100
Paragraphs per DIV = 50
---
$("#div50 p") = 2ms
$("p", "
t; > it as scope for further selects.
>
> > by(e)
> > Stephan
> > 2009/2/23 ricardobeat :
>
> > up to jQuery 1.2.6 that's how the selector engine worked (from the top
>
> > down/left to right). The approach used in Sizzle (bottom up/right to
>
> > lef
Looks like a bug to me. In this case it seems like doing just "li"
would be equivalent to what you want. Could you file it here?
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
--John
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Sjeiti wrote:
>
> I've build a recursive tree. Now I'm trying to get the number of list
> e
I just changed your setting to 'No Email'.
--John
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Alan Williams wrote:
> Hi
>
> I currently get all the posts to this group sent to me by email, but
> not because I am a member of the Google group (I must have signed up to the
> emails before the group was set
> Awesome, thanks John. So UI 1.7 should be around the corner as well?
Let's hope so! You'll have to ask the UI team :-) I think they're
getting real close, though.
--John
Hi Everyone -
Full details here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3.2
Enjoy!
--John
.not() and .filter() don't work against text nodes (they're
immediately removed). If you wish to just get the text nodes you can
do:
$("p").contents().filter(function(){ return this.nodeType !== 1; })
Although, it sounds like you're trying to do this instead:
$("p").wrapInner("");
--John
A lot has changed with regard to the selector engine in 1.3.1 - it
this case it looks like these type of selections didn't benefit. One
thing that would change that, though, would be caching the selectors
that you do run. Right now you run a couple of these over-and-over
again. I'd probably rewrit
Do you have some sample markup? It's kind of hard to determine from
just the code.
--John
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Sjoland wrote:
>
> Hi!,
>
> When switching between 1.3.1 and 1.2.6 i get a serious drop in speed
> when collection a JSON object from static HTML content.
>
> 1.2.6
> FF:
> I'm curious what the benefit of that would be. Given that the
> window.undefined property exists and has the undefined value, I'd think they
> would give the same result.
They give the same results for properties, at least:
someObject.undefinedProperty === undefined
but not for variables th
> Safari: +3ms, +2ms, +7ms, +3ms, +4ms
> Opera: +46ms, +35ms, +21ms, +19ms, +36ms
I forgot to mention that this means that == is about 10% slower than
=== in both browsers.
--John
> Why implement jQuery.isFunction when you can also just go typeof
> variable == 'function'?
You can see some of the cases that we handle that normal typeof can't, here:
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/unit/core.js#L176
--John
It really depends in which browser you test. I'm seeing little to no
difference in IE and Firefox - but a noticeable difference in Safari
and Opera.
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/equals/
Safari: +3ms, +2ms, +7ms, +3ms, +4ms
Opera: +46ms, +35ms, +21ms, +19ms, +36ms
(over 500,000 iterations)
Extra function calls sure - plus there's really no need for those
methods, they're already a part of JavaScript.
typeof FOO === "string"
typeof FOO === "number"
typeof FOO === "boolean"
--John
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:53 PM, pbcomm wrote:
>
> This might be a stupid question, but I have to
No problem man. In the future feel free to bring issues like this up
on the jquery-dev list - we can diagnose or fix the problem quite
quickly. Thanks for spotting this!
--John
On 2/16/09, ml1 wrote:
>
> Holy cow, before I even submitted the bug report!
>
> On Feb 16, 1:24 pm
I filed a bug and fixed the issue:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4167
--John
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, ml1 wrote:
>
> Tragically none of those quoting variations work. (I've pretty much
> exhausted every quote variation in my desperate search to try to
> figure out what's going on.)
Umm - that's not true at all.
I created a test for you to see:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/class-speed/
In Firefox 3 I'm getting:
ID Raw: 9 ID jQuery: 22 (over 500 queries)
Class Raw: 1108 Class jQuery: 778 (over 100 queries)
In Safari 3.2 I'm getting:
ID Raw: 1 ID jQuery: 3 (over 500 qu
That seems like a good use to me!
--John
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Chris wrote:
>
> I ventured into feature detection, and I want to make sure I'm doing
> this the "right" way. Basically the fx on the jQuery UI tabs causes
> aliasing in IE 6/7 (but not 8). Instead of checking for thos
That's odd. Could you file a bug on this?
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
Thanks!
--John
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Javier Martinez wrote:
> I'm creating a component for an application I'm developing and I have
> upgraded jquery to the last version to get it's speed boost.
> After some
Yeah, that's expected - you would need to bind the event handler,
attributes, etc. etc. before you run insertAfter. We might want to
look at making that not the case, at some point, but that would
require an API change.
If you're interested in that, you should file a feature ticket here:
http://d
It looks like you're trying to use a jQuery UI effect - maybe that's why?
--John
2009/1/30 gmacgregor :
>
> Consider this markup:
>
>
> Foo
>
> Hello!
>
>
>
> Since upgrading to 1.3, this no longer works:
>
> $('div.holder h4').click(function() {
>$(this).toggleClass('close');
>
This was fixed in 1.3.1.
--John
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Soulcatcher wrote:
>
> Say i have several elements with class='someclass' and they DON'T have
> attribute 'initialized' initially.
>
> When i do $('.someclass[initialized!=1]') in 1.2.6, i get the list of
> all those elements.
>
I'm not seeing this, no. Do you have a link to the app? What version
of Firebug are you using?
--John
On 1/22/09, Loren wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an application that does lots of HTML injection, animation, and
> manipulation, and I'm a long time user and fan of jQuery.
>
> Recently I downloa
The team at Microsoft is already working on it. Hopefully it'll be ready soon.
--John
On 1/22/09, Fisher Ning wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Does anyone know when the jQuery Visual studio doc (jquery-vsdoc.js) will be
> updated for new 1.3.1? Is there any plan for this?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Fisher
>
I filed a bug over here:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3928
and have since fixed the issue.
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Balazs Endresz
wrote:
>
> Unforunately it's just turned out that there's anothor isssue behind
> this. You can follow the ticket if you want update on this, I gu
Also, could you post that URL to the jquery-dev list when you have it? Thanks.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Resig wrote:
> Do you have a URL for your site anywhere?
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at
Do you have an example anywhere that we can look at? Also, could you
post a follow-up to the jquery-dev list? Thanks.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Walther wrote:
>
> I am having an issue with the new live events in jQuery 1.3.
> Specificall
Do you have a URL for your site anywhere?
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:45 AM, yellow1912 wrote:
>
> When I try to use jquery 1.3 on my test site, I get this error:
> jQuery.queue is not a function
> [Break on this error] var queue = jQuery.queue( this, type, data );
> (firebug)
>
> The s
Why not just do:
function addEvent(obj, evt, fn){
jQuery(obj).bind(evt, fn);
}
Just defer everything to jQuery!
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:48 AM, rundmw wrote:
>
> I have an existing application which I would like to transition to use
> jQuery. The app currently uses Dean Edwards ad
$(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*:not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*').filter(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*').not('div:has(div)')
Hope that helps to answer your question :)
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:24 AM, jdwbell wrote:
>
> Here I am trying to get ev
The jquery-ui list would be a better place for this question.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Eric Garside wrote:
>
> When is this planned on coming out? Anyone know?
What version of jQuery are you using?
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:35 AM, floyd wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Here is my situation.
>
> HTML Page DTD Type is declared as following
>
> http://www.w3.org/
> TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
>
> Javascript Code as following
>
> $("#fp > option[text*='"+su
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3 is out! Full details here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/01/14/jquery-13-and-the-jquery-foundation/
Happy 3rd Birthday, jQuery!
--John
> "Why disappointingly?"
>
> Because 1.2 to 1.3 is a big major release... and there's a few post to
> "test test test", but there's no indication of what to test for..
> what's changed what could break
Huh? Did you miss the beta 1 post where we outlined everything that
could've broken?
h
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3rc2 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
(the 14th).
You can grab the source here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.3rc2.js
Please let me know, personally, if you find some bad new bug
Do you have an example? It's kind of hard to figure out what's going
wrong with only a line to look at.
--John
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Canglan wrote:
>
> Kudos!
>
> John, the RC1's new selector is causing problems with some of my
> existing code base, I've submitted a ticket:
>
> ht
>> jQuery 1.3rc1 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
>> barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
>
> That's great news. For those of us who haven't been following recent
> development, are there any release notes available?
Nope - but there will be
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3rc1 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
(the 14th).
You can grab the source here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.3rc1.js
Please let me know, personally, if you find some bad new bug
Beta 2 is now out - and we need help testing it! More information here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/01/05/help-test-jquery-13-beta-2/
--John
Maybe:
$("#container").children().not("#header, #content, #footer").empty();
--John
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Is there better way?
>
> var elem = $('#container')[0];
> var arr = ["header","content","footer"];
> jQuery.each(elem.childNodes,function(
Hi Everyone -
The jQuery dev team just got jQuery 1.3 Beta 1 out the door. Help us
test this release and make sure it goes nice and smoothly!
http://blog.jquery.com/2008/12/22/help-test-jquery-13-beta-1/
Thanks in advance.
--John
That's an XPath selector, not a CSS selector. To do that in jQuery you
would need to do:
$("tr:not(:has(th)):even")
--John
On Dec 20, 9:38 am, "chinnakarup...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried a eg for :not operator.According to which it should not pick
> up the Table header but it does .what
jQuery doesn't support XPath selectors any more - you need to use CSS
selectors.
$("p").addClass("jq");
--John
On Dec 20, 9:36 am, "chinnakarup...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying XPATH selector with jqueryit doesn't seem to
> work..find below the eg.it should select the paragraph.
>
Yes, that is perfectly fine on the MIT license.
--John
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:45 PM, acesfull9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I am working on a web application project that utilizes jquery. I would like
> to be able to license the system I created to local businesses for a fee.
> Is this
I'm fairly certain that's incorrect syntax (putting a div inside a
span - especially one that's self-closing). The browser will
automatically force the div outside the span.
--John
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has someone else already posted this bug?
>
> $(".u:last > li:last").addClass("last");
Close.
$("ul.u > li:last-child").addClass("last");
You may want to move that child ul inside an li - it's not proper HTML
to put a UL inside a UL.
--John
> On 28 Okt., 13:07, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I ha
Kind of hard to debug what you're talking about without seeing it. Do
you have an example?
--John
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM, dvdavid2001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> This is my 1st time asking the questions hence please bear with me if I did
> it wrongly or etc.
>
> I h
Try something like this:
$(".photo").click(function() {
$(".jq").hide().load("photo.htm", function(){
$(this).slideDown("slow") });
$(".closerbutton").show("slow").attr("title", "close");
return false;
});
$(".about").click(function
Fixed, sorry about that.
--John
On Oct 1, 10:22 am, Leanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow... looks like someone's trying to get more links...
>
> On Sep 30, 2:08 pm, equallyunequal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Woops looks like jQuery blog got hit by a sql-injection attack!
>
> > On Sep 30
This is a completely unrelated issue - we host jQuery.com (the
homepage, blog, and dev) on a separate server with Rimuhosting. There
was a power outage at the server facility and they're working ot bring
it back up:
http://rimuhosting.com/maintenance.jsp?server_maint_oid=68009362
The other sub-do
> AFAIK jquery.com provides files for downloading not hotlinking. So you
> should have used your own server to serve js in the first place.
We provide code.jquery.com to hotlink to - that's perfectly ok.
--John
>google.load("jquery", "1.2");
>google.load("jqueryui", "1.5");
>
>
> Nothing else needs to be changed.
>
> A good article on the subject:
> http://ajaxian.com/archives/announcing-ajax-libraries-api-speed-up-your-ajax-apps-
We just acquired four new servers from Media Temple, yesterday. We'll
be moving the various sub-domains (docs, plugins, dev, ui) to their
own unique servers this week - this should help with load times
significantly.
But yes, it's mostly due to popularity issues (we're getting the
equivalent of a
It was launched the Friday before last. You can thank Scott Jehl for
all the hard work he did!
--John
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Chris Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like the look of the new jQuery website. When did it get launched?
> My hats off to the designers! It looks
He's using Document Ready - that's not the issue.
To quote Jake from another thread:
"See this http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3143. Long story short, jQuery
only supports $(html) or $(xmlObject)."
--John
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Rene Veerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.learn
Try changing this line:
$(this.children).show();
to:
$(this).children().show();
The first uses a property that's not available in Firefox - whereas
the second uses a jQuery method that works in all browsers.
--John
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Phonedude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My
We've been working with the guys at Media Temple - they're going to be
breaking us off into multiple servers. Right now the docs site (for example)
is getting the equivalent of about 3-4 "Slashdot"/"Digg" effects per day so
we have to boost up the resources that we have.
--John
On Thu, Aug 28, 2
All our static files are hosted on Amazon S3 - they had an outage earlier today.
--John
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Pepperman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> same here. no CSS. degrading gracefully.
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:46 PM, xwisdom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
Hey - can you provide an example site? It's unclear what might be
wrong without seeing a response from the server. What is the value of
xml when it comes back?
--John
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Tzury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The following example (from the jquery-doc-site) works fin
Yes, Dimensions is completely a part of jQuery as of jQuery 1.2.6.
--John
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:49 PM, jquertil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the other day was told latest jquery now includes dimensions plugin
> but I was certain it does not... I still assume it does not, thus I
> compile t
In which browser(s) are you having this issue?
--John
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Vik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using jQuery to fade in my site logo on my home page header, to
> give the home page some animation. It works great.
>
> So that the page will degrade gracefully if the
I'm fairly certain that our .text() support has changed a lot since
October 2006 (!). It would be interesting to re-examine this issue -
if there are any current problems I know that we'd really like to get
them fixed.
--John
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
jQuery(element).hasClass('classname')
--John
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Harald Armin Massa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> I am in the process of converting some MochiKit code to jquery.
>
> I was used to a comfortable funciton
>
> hasElementClass(element, 'classname')
>
> which
Popping "jquery.delegate.js" into Google provides this:
http://dev.jquery.com/export/5759/trunk/plugins/delegate/jquery.delegate.js
--John
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:17 AM, jez_p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I should just explain that I'm very new to jQuery. That out of the
> way, I have downlo
I'm working on this (well, trying to get more of the jQuery test suite
to pass). I've broken it out into a separate project here:
http://github.com/jeresig/env-js/tree/master
I'm also trying to get it to run on more platforms (such as
Ruby/Johnson, Perl/Spidermonkey, and Python/Spidermonkey).
--
You could do this:
jQuery('').html(data).find('li').appendTo('#el');
--John
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Toxane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm porting a Mootools script to jQuery. Basically I need to
> extract some data from existing data. In Mootools, I did it like this:
>
> This
Jeff -
Safari 2 has serious memory issues that are impossible to work around
- simply loading and executing too much JavaScript will cause it to
crash (as you see with the test suite). We do run the test suite
against Safari 2 but in pieces to verify that it works as intended.
Yes, we still suppo
jQuery(document).ready(function(){
setInterval(function(){
jQuery('#usersOnlineTxt').load(siteURL+'fetch/online-users');
}, 30);
});
--John
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:58 AM, azz0r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey guys, I'm trying to convert my scripts to jQuery, I wondered if
> you
Sure, we'll take credit for that :-)
--John
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Josh Nathanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great job on this release guys.
>
> I also noticed when developing a plugin that it seems the memory management
> in IE6 is greatly improved. I accidentally was using 1.2.1
.extend() was used extensively in the event handling code, hence the
need for improvement.
> How does it compare with other libraries now?
How does what compare? No other library is making the optimizations we
are - or even examining how to perform faster operations here.
--John
1 - 100 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
