Hello All -
After much deliberation the jQuery team has decided to close down the
Google Groups that we've been using for project discussion and move to
a unified forum instead.
The new forum can be found here:
http://forum.jquery.com/
More information about our decision to move can be found
More details here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/12/04/jquery-14-alpha-1-released/
--John
jQuery does not support :target. The only reason why it works in Firefox 3.5
is that it provides a native querySelectorAll method. We would have to have
an implementation that works in other browser (FF 3.0, IE 8, etc.) and we
don't have that right now. You're welcome to file a ticket asking for
That sounds about right - hopefully we'll be able to direct them to a forum,
eventually (which would be much easier to use, I'd expect, for someone who's
using twitter).
--John
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Mike Alsup mal...@gmail.com wrote:
Over the past few months I've been fielding an
It looks similar to the one above, but different. I'll try and check in to
them both.
gentry - can you file a bug for the issue you found, preferably with a full
test case?
--John
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Jeffrey Kretz jeffkr...@hotmail.comwrote:
My guess is its related to a problem
am, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks similar to the one above, but different. I'll try and check in
to
them both.
gentry - can you file a bug for the issue you found, preferably with a
full
test case?
--John
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Jeffrey Kretz jeffkr
We just landed some code in the latest nightly versions of jQuery to
auto-detect if the page has already loaded. You can try it here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-nightly.js
--John
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, ujamu danab1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have developed a FF extension that loads a
These are a duplicate of http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4512 which has been
fixed.
--John
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Mondo Libero i...@vincenzoferme.it wrote:
Here: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4753, and Here:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4960
some users send this bug on bug tracker.
Just remove the @ and it'll work fine.
--John
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, micorreo13 micorre...@gmail.com wrote:
I was using jquery-1.2.6 and now, I started to use jquery-1.3.2, and I
get my first difference: when I use the wrapped set operation $
(':inp...@name=submit]') with
How many times is clickcharges called? Perhaps you're binding a click more
than once.
--John
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:03 PM, marksimon zen...@gmail.com wrote:
Still getting 2 alerts.
On Jul 29, 11:49 am, Eric Garside gars...@gmail.com wrote:
Pretty sure its because the event is bubbling
All messages are moderated - so it'll depend heavily upon when we're able to
review them.
--John
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Cesar Sanz the.email.tr...@gmail.comwrote:
I takes about 3 hrs to display your first message. dunno why
- Original Message - From: Jon Jackson
It looks like you're using the old liveQuery plugin. Why not just use
.bind() or .live()?
--John
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:11 PM, pedalpete p...@hearwhere.com wrote:
So, this isn't related to any one bit of code, but it seems to be a
problem I run into almost everytime i need to stop a form
It looks like it may have already been fixed:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496790
Thanks for the heads-up, though!
--John
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:09 PM, benjambenjamwel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure support for a beta release is a bad thing to be asking for,
but I mostly
Well, in 1.3.2 it now throws an exception, since the CSS selector # is
invalid. If you wish to use that precise technique I'd wrap a try/catch
around the jQuery statement to catch the error.
--John
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:22 AM, madmax019 maxi.karr...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I
Could you try it with an unminified version of jQuery? That might help a
little bit with debugging.
--John
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Devision c...@e950.lv wrote:
Hello.
I recently updated my jQuery to 1.3.2 from 1.2.6 and now firebug shows
me error: tagName is undefined (jquery.js
Do you have Firebug installed? Some versions of Firebug submit requests
twice.
--John
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Josh Ain josh@gmail.com wrote:
Very intermittently, I am finding ajax requests submitted with jquery are
being submitted twice, once with parameters, and once without
Upgrading is probably safe - it's the engine that'll be in jQuery 1.3.3.
--John
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 AM, swalke16 swalk...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a situation where I have some HTML I am selecting elements from
using the .class tag selector combination using jQuery v1.3.2. I
have
Interesting. Do you think you could file a bug on this and then post it to
the jQuery-dev list? Thanks!
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, giovanni gflam...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that certain selectors work in
return false does e.preventDefault() and e.stopPropagation().
--John
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, kgosser kgos...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious if there is a best practice when choosing between
$(a).click(function(){
// stuff
return false;
});
and
$(a).click(function(){
4, 5:05 am, Javier Martinez ecentin...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure!
Createdhttp://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4058
Hope there is some easy patch, if not, I will regret to 1.2.6 inmediately :(
2009/2/3 John Resig jere...@gmail.com
That's odd. Could you file a bug on this?
http://dev.jquery.com
Well, without being able to see the form in question - does your page
validate? If everything is going into a single input that sounds like
a problem with malformed HTML markup.
--John
2009/3/30 Kathryn kathry...@gmail.com:
I'm working on a web form and had to upgrade to 1.3.2 tonight to
Why not just use a nightly build? No need to wait for a full release.
http://code.jquery.com/nightlies/jquery-2009-03-26.js
--John
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:03 AM, dberthia dave.berthia...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody have any insight into when 1.3.3 might be released? There are
a couple of
Uhhh... why were there like 30 of these submitted to the mailing list?
Your email address has now been banned. Please contact me off-list if
you wish to rectify the situation.
--John
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:45 PM, InfiniteSkills Support Center
i...@infiniteskills.com wrote:
This message
PM, John Resig wrote:
Uhhh... why were there like 30 of these submitted to the mailing list?
Your email address has now been banned. Please contact me off-list if
you wish to rectify the situation.
--John
If I remember correctly - the NetFront browser was missing some fairly
fundamental features. I don't remember which, off-hand, but it was enough to
cause jQuery not even to load.
--John
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Johan johandesi...@gmail.com wrote:
jQuery fails on the Playstation 3
Why not do:
$('#first').click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); });
--John
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:20 AM, John Smith master9...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 2 containers
i disabled event bubbling for first container. This is must have $
('#first').click(function() { return false; });
Now
.
After positing this directly to John Resig via twitter I got a response
asking me to try:
$(‘#myDiv’).animate({top : “-=26%”});
However the object always animates to: “top: 0px” regardless of its starting
position, percentage value and the +=, -= notation.
Is this a bug or am I missing
The benchmark is getElementById().getElementsByTagName() - why not
inlcude that in the test?
But it's not that simple (it never is). That code doesn't take into
account browsers, like IE, returning element that have a name equal to
the ID, not does it take into account the element (with the
To follow-up from my post yesterday, here are the new numbers, for
1.3.3 (work in progress, naturally):
http://ejohn.org/files/jquery1.3.3/id.html
jQuery version used = 1.3.3pre
Total number of DIVs = 100
Paragraphs per DIV = 50
---
$(#div50 p) = 2ms
$(p,
WOW! Check out the last 2 tests, John. Syntax #4 takes 512-times
longer than #5! I think this code needs a little TLC too ;)
It was also interesting that $(#div500).children(p) is 10-times
slower than $(#div500).find(p). So I added one final test using
childNodes and filter() to see if I
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:21 PM, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
WOW! Check out the last 2 tests, John. Syntax #4 takes 512-times
longer than #5! I think this code needs a little TLC too ;)
It was also interesting that $(#div500).children(p) is 10-times
slower than $(#div500).find(p). So I
of a browser makers' concern.
- ricardo
On Feb 23, 1:08 pm, Peter Bengtsson pete...@gmail.com wrote:
I watched the John Resig presentation too and learned that CSS
selectors always work from right to left.
That would mean that doing this::
$('#foo p')
Would extract all p tags
I just changed your setting to 'No Email'.
--John
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Alan Williams a...@ralentango.co.uk wrote:
Hi
I currently get all the posts to this group sent to me by email, but
not because I am a member of the Google group (I must have signed up to the
emails before
Looks like a bug to me. In this case it seems like doing just li
would be equivalent to what you want. Could you file it here?
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
--John
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Sjeiti sje...@gmail.com wrote:
I've build a recursive tree. Now I'm trying to get the
A lot has changed with regard to the selector engine in 1.3.1 - it
this case it looks like these type of selections didn't benefit. One
thing that would change that, though, would be caching the selectors
that you do run. Right now you run a couple of these over-and-over
again. I'd probably
.not() and .filter() don't work against text nodes (they're
immediately removed). If you wish to just get the text nodes you can
do:
$(p).contents().filter(function(){ return this.nodeType !== 1; })
Although, it sounds like you're trying to do this instead:
$(p).wrapInner(b/b);
--John
Hi Everyone -
Full details here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3.2
Enjoy!
--John
Awesome, thanks John. So UI 1.7 should be around the corner as well?
Let's hope so! You'll have to ask the UI team :-) I think they're
getting real close, though.
--John
I'm curious what the benefit of that would be. Given that the
window.undefined property exists and has the undefined value, I'd think they
would give the same result.
They give the same results for properties, at least:
someObject.undefinedProperty === undefined
but not for variables that
Do you have some sample markup? It's kind of hard to determine from
just the code.
--John
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Sjoland jo...@sjoland.com wrote:
Hi!,
When switching between 1.3.1 and 1.2.6 i get a serious drop in speed
when collection a JSON object from static HTML content.
Extra function calls sure - plus there's really no need for those
methods, they're already a part of JavaScript.
typeof FOO === string
typeof FOO === number
typeof FOO === boolean
--John
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:53 PM, pbcomm pbc...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be a stupid question, but I
It really depends in which browser you test. I'm seeing little to no
difference in IE and Firefox - but a noticeable difference in Safari
and Opera.
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/equals/
Safari: +3ms, +2ms, +7ms, +3ms, +4ms
Opera: +46ms, +35ms, +21ms, +19ms, +36ms
(over 500,000
Why implement jQuery.isFunction when you can also just go typeof
variable == 'function'?
You can see some of the cases that we handle that normal typeof can't, here:
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/unit/core.js#L176
--John
Safari: +3ms, +2ms, +7ms, +3ms, +4ms
Opera: +46ms, +35ms, +21ms, +19ms, +36ms
I forgot to mention that this means that == is about 10% slower than
=== in both browsers.
--John
Umm - that's not true at all.
I created a test for you to see:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/class-speed/
In Firefox 3 I'm getting:
ID Raw: 9 ID jQuery: 22 (over 500 queries)
Class Raw: 1108 Class jQuery: 778 (over 100 queries)
In Safari 3.2 I'm getting:
ID Raw: 1 ID jQuery: 3 (over 500
I filed a bug and fixed the issue:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4167
--John
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, ml1 tsummer...@gmail.com wrote:
Tragically none of those quoting variations work. (I've pretty much
exhausted every quote variation in my desperate search to try to
figure out
, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
I filed a bug and fixed the issue:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/4167
--John
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, ml1 tsummer...@gmail.com wrote:
Tragically none of those quoting variations work. (I've pretty much
exhausted every quote variation in my
That seems like a good use to me!
--John
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Chris cpot...@siolon.com wrote:
I ventured into feature detection, and I want to make sure I'm doing
this the right way. Basically the fx on the jQuery UI tabs causes
aliasing in IE 6/7 (but not 8). Instead of
That's odd. Could you file a bug on this?
http://dev.jquery.com/newticket
Thanks!
--John
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Javier Martinez ecentin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm creating a component for an application I'm developing and I have
upgraded jquery to the last version to get it's speed
It looks like you're trying to use a jQuery UI effect - maybe that's why?
--John
2009/1/30 gmacgregor gmacgre...@gmail.com:
Consider this markup:
div class=holder
h4Foo/h4
div class=bar
Hello!
/div
/div
Since upgrading to 1.3, this no longer works:
$('div.holder
The team at Microsoft is already working on it. Hopefully it'll be ready soon.
--John
On 1/22/09, Fisher Ning ning...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Does anyone know when the jQuery Visual studio doc (jquery-vsdoc.js) will be
updated for new 1.3.1? Is there any plan for this?
Regards,
I'm not seeing this, no. Do you have a link to the app? What version
of Firebug are you using?
--John
On 1/22/09, Loren lorenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have an application that does lots of HTML injection, animation, and
manipulation, and I'm a long time user and fan of jQuery.
This was fixed in 1.3.1.
--John
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Soulcatcher foril...@gmail.com wrote:
Say i have several elements with class='someclass' and they DON'T have
attribute 'initialized' initially.
When i do $('.someclass[initialized!=1]') in 1.2.6, i get the list of
all
I filed a bug over here:
http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3928
and have since fixed the issue.
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Balazs Endresz
balazs.endr...@gmail.com wrote:
Unforunately it's just turned out that there's anothor isssue behind
this. You can follow the ticket if you
Why not just do:
function addEvent(obj, evt, fn){
jQuery(obj).bind(evt, fn);
}
Just defer everything to jQuery!
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:48 AM, rundmw run...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an existing application which I would like to transition to use
jQuery. The app currently uses
Do you have a URL for your site anywhere?
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:45 AM, yellow1912 yellow1...@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to use jquery 1.3 on my test site, I get this error:
jQuery.queue is not a function
[Break on this error] var queue = jQuery.queue( this, type, data );
Do you have an example anywhere that we can look at? Also, could you
post a follow-up to the jquery-dev list? Thanks.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Walther waltherl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having an issue with the new live events in
Also, could you post that URL to the jquery-dev list when you have it? Thanks.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have a URL for your site anywhere?
--John
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:45 AM
What version of jQuery are you using?
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 2:35 AM, floyd floyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here is my situation.
HTML Page DTD Type is declared as following
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN http://www.w3.org/
TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd
The jquery-ui list would be a better place for this question.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-ui
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Eric Garside gars...@gmail.com wrote:
When is this planned on coming out? Anyone know?
$(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*:not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*').filter(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
$('*').not('div:has(div)')
Hope that helps to answer your question :)
--John
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:24 AM, jdwbell jdwb...@gmail.com wrote:
Here I am
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3 is out! Full details here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/01/14/jquery-13-and-the-jquery-foundation/
Happy 3rd Birthday, jQuery!
--John
Why disappointingly?
Because 1.2 to 1.3 is a big major release... and there's a few post to
test test test, but there's no indication of what to test for..
what's changed what could break
Huh? Did you miss the beta 1 post where we outlined everything that
could've broken?
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3rc2 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
(the 14th).
You can grab the source here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.3rc2.js
Please let me know, personally, if you find some bad new
Hey Everyone -
jQuery 1.3rc1 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
(the 14th).
You can grab the source here:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.3rc1.js
Please let me know, personally, if you find some bad new
jQuery 1.3rc1 is ready. This means that 1.3 is effectively finished
barring a horrible bug between now and the final release on Wednesday
That's great news. For those of us who haven't been following recent
development, are there any release notes available?
Nope - but there will be a full
Do you have an example? It's kind of hard to figure out what's going
wrong with only a line to look at.
--John
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Canglan cang...@gmail.com wrote:
Kudos!
John, the RC1's new selector is causing problems with some of my
existing code base, I've submitted a
Beta 2 is now out - and we need help testing it! More information here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2009/01/05/help-test-jquery-13-beta-2/
--John
Maybe:
$(#container).children().not(#header, #content, #footer).empty();
--John
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Dirceu Barquette
dirceu.barque...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Is there better way?
var elem = $('#container')[0];
var arr = [header,content,footer];
Hi Everyone -
The jQuery dev team just got jQuery 1.3 Beta 1 out the door. Help us
test this release and make sure it goes nice and smoothly!
http://blog.jquery.com/2008/12/22/help-test-jquery-13-beta-1/
Thanks in advance.
--John
jQuery doesn't support XPath selectors any more - you need to use CSS
selectors.
$(p).addClass(jq);
--John
On Dec 20, 9:36 am, chinnakarup...@gmail.com
chinnakarup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying XPATH selector with jqueryit doesn't seem to
work..find below the eg.it should select
That's an XPath selector, not a CSS selector. To do that in jQuery you
would need to do:
$(tr:not(:has(th)):even)
--John
On Dec 20, 9:38 am, chinnakarup...@gmail.com
chinnakarup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried a eg for :not operator.According to which it should not pick
up the Table header
Yes, that is perfectly fine on the MIT license.
--John
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:45 PM, acesfull9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working on a web application project that utilizes jquery. I would like
to be able to license the system I created to local businesses for a fee.
Is this
I'm fairly certain that's incorrect syntax (putting a div inside a
span - especially one that's self-closing). The browser will
automatically force the div outside the span.
--John
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has someone else already posted this bug?
The
$(.u:last li:last).addClass(last);
Close.
$(ul.u li:last-child).addClass(last);
You may want to move that child ul inside an li - it's not proper HTML
to put a UL inside a UL.
--John
On 28 Okt., 13:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a question on
Kind of hard to debug what you're talking about without seeing it. Do
you have an example?
--John
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM, dvdavid2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
This is my 1st time asking the questions hence please bear with me if I did
it wrongly or etc.
I have a
Try something like this:
$(.photo).click(function() {
$(.jq).hide().load(photo.htm, function(){
$(this).slideDown(slow) });
$(.closerbutton).show(slow).attr(title, close);
return false;
});
$(.about).click(function() {
This is a completely unrelated issue - we host jQuery.com (the
homepage, blog, and dev) on a separate server with Rimuhosting. There
was a power outage at the server facility and they're working ot bring
it back up:
http://rimuhosting.com/maintenance.jsp?server_maint_oid=68009362
The other
AFAIK jquery.com provides files for downloading not hotlinking. So you
should have used your own server to serve js in the first place.
We provide code.jquery.com to hotlink to - that's perfectly ok.
--John
);
/script
Nothing else needs to be changed.
A good article on the subject:
http://ajaxian.com/archives/announcing-ajax-libraries-api-speed-up-your-ajax-apps-with-googles-infrastructure
-Acacio
On Sep 17, 7:05 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just acquired four new servers from
It was launched the Friday before last. You can thank Scott Jehl for
all the hard work he did!
--John
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Chris Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like the look of the new jQuery website. When did it get launched?
My hats off to the designers! It looks
He's using Document Ready - that's not the issue.
To quote Jake from another thread:
See this http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3143. Long story short, jQuery
only supports $(html) or $(xmlObject).
--John
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Rene Veerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try changing this line:
$(this.children).show();
to:
$(this).children().show();
The first uses a property that's not available in Firefox - whereas
the second uses a jQuery method that works in all browsers.
--John
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Phonedude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My
We've been working with the guys at Media Temple - they're going to be
breaking us off into multiple servers. Right now the docs site (for example)
is getting the equivalent of about 3-4 Slashdot/Digg effects per day so
we have to boost up the resources that we have.
--John
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008
All our static files are hosted on Amazon S3 - they had an outage earlier today.
--John
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Pepperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same here. no CSS. degrading gracefully.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:46 PM, xwisdom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The website
Hey - can you provide an example site? It's unclear what might be
wrong without seeing a response from the server. What is the value of
xml when it comes back?
--John
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Tzury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following example (from the jquery-doc-site) works fine
Yes, Dimensions is completely a part of jQuery as of jQuery 1.2.6.
--John
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:49 PM, jquertil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the other day was told latest jquery now includes dimensions plugin
but I was certain it does not... I still assume it does not, thus I
compile the
In which browser(s) are you having this issue?
--John
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Vik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using jQuery to fade in my site logo on my home page header, to
give the home page some animation. It works great.
So that the page will degrade gracefully if the user
I'm fairly certain that our .text() support has changed a lot since
October 2006 (!). It would be interesting to re-examine this issue -
if there are any current problems I know that we'd really like to get
them fixed.
--John
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Popping jquery.delegate.js into Google provides this:
http://dev.jquery.com/export/5759/trunk/plugins/delegate/jquery.delegate.js
--John
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:17 AM, jez_p [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should just explain that I'm very new to jQuery. That out of the
way, I have downloaded
jQuery(element).hasClass('classname')
--John
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Harald Armin Massa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
I am in the process of converting some MochiKit code to jquery.
I was used to a comfortable funciton
hasElementClass(element, 'classname')
which checked if
I'm working on this (well, trying to get more of the jQuery test suite
to pass). I've broken it out into a separate project here:
http://github.com/jeresig/env-js/tree/master
I'm also trying to get it to run on more platforms (such as
Ruby/Johnson, Perl/Spidermonkey, and Python/Spidermonkey).
Jeff -
Safari 2 has serious memory issues that are impossible to work around
- simply loading and executing too much JavaScript will cause it to
crash (as you see with the test suite). We do run the test suite
against Safari 2 but in pieces to verify that it works as intended.
Yes, we still
jQuery(document).ready(function(){
setInterval(function(){
jQuery('#usersOnlineTxt').load(siteURL+'fetch/online-users');
}, 30);
});
--John
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:58 AM, azz0r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, I'm trying to convert my scripts to jQuery, I wondered if
you guys
Still a performance improvement, but not as great as the test machine
- i.e. the faster the client PC processor, the better the performance
improvement (I don't think RAM will have much of an impact as the CPU
is doing the work).
How so? Your .extend() improved by 37% and your .map()
.extend() was used extensively in the event handling code, hence the
need for improvement.
How does it compare with other libraries now?
How does what compare? No other library is making the optimizations we
are - or even examining how to perform faster operations here.
--John
Sure, we'll take credit for that :-)
--John
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Josh Nathanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great job on this release guys.
I also noticed when developing a plugin that it seems the memory management
in IE6 is greatly improved. I accidentally was using 1.2.1 while
I'm confused - you're getting and modifying the onclick attribute?
That seems... strange.
--John
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Phil Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've run into a strange issue that I believe is a bug in jQuery 1.2.6.
I've posted a ticket along with a test
Victor: That shouldn't be the case (if you're using noConflict). Note
that the code he presented worked with 1.2.3.
--John
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kape:
Just read your post again. You are using prototype. I believe that it
conflicts with 1.2.5 and
What if you use jquery-1.2.6.js (not packed).
--John
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:26 AM, kape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'm sure that someone would have mentioned that the latest
releases don't work, so that can't be it. It's obvious that I'm
missing something.
I've been using jQuery
1 - 100 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
