We should just use upcoming.org - free and easy to use. We should do
an evening meetup (that way we're not pressured by lunch, etc.). How
about after the second day? (That way all the jQuery talks will be out
of the way and we can have a good time.)
--John
On 7/13/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL
That's correct - jQuery no longer interacts with events that are bound
using old event handlers. Although, this could probably be resolved.
Could you file a bug on this in the bug tracker?
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On 7/12/07, Bin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
script
You'll have to use a separate namespace - jQuery, internally, expects
the 'this' object to refer to itself - and if it's within the context
of another object, it'll probably get confused. (I've never tried this
personally.)
That being said, I like that idea, and it would be cool if jQuery
could
Umm - I have no idea! Yehuda has been working on jQuery Quickly - is
this book different from that one?
--John
On 7/12/07, Scott Sauyet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's doing the Manning jQuery in Action book? I've just been asked
to do a technical review.
-- Scott
future though aren't they?
On Jul 12, 2:34 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's correct - jQuery no longer interacts with events that are bound
using old event handlers. Although, this could probably be resolved.
Could you file a bug on this in the bug tracker?http://dev.jquery.com
Sorry, it's back up now!
On 7/12/07, Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here...
_
SEAN O
Andy Matthews-4 wrote:
Not working yet? I just get spinning and spinning.
--
View this message in context:
Looks good Chris, I'll try to get this in soon (possibly 1.1.4 or
1.1.3.2, whichever comes first).
--John
On 7/12/07, Chris Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, this is still a bug in 1.1.3.1. I've updated the ticket but figured
mentioning it and the fix from the original filer may save
Hey everyone -
Once a year Ajaxian.com does a reader survey to try and get a feel for
how people are using JavaScript, and JavaScript frameworks.
If you're interested in participating, please feel free to complete the survey:
Try sending it directly to Yehuda:
wycats at gmail.com
--John
On 7/11/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 10:34 pm, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For more details please visit the jQuery blog entry here:
http://jquery.com/blog/2007/06/28/163/
Hiya! The email addy in
You have to add an extra wrapper function in .ready(), like so:
$(document).ready(function(){
// your code
});
On 7/10/07, tlob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
First very simple question: why ist this not allowed?
[code]
$(document).ready(
var isplaying = false;
//something else
);
This is exactly what's done by blockUI:
http://www.malsup.com/jquery/block/#element
In fact, it's almost identical - I wonder if they got some inspiration
from blockUI?
--John
On 7/10/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed this new ajax loading script.
Stephan -
Great work! I could definitely see how this would be useful.
--John
On 7/9/07, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya!
The jQ site says that this list is the place to make announcements,
so here it goes...
The past couple of days i've been working on an application for
What? Of course it's supported. Interface is still an official plugin
- if something was broken in this release, we'll need to resolve it.
Phil - do you have a demo where this is occurring?
--John
On 7/7/07, Terry B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
interface isnt supported under 1.1.3
On Jul 7,
Kim -
We haven't seen any errors like this, do you have a page up where we
can see it in action?
--John
On 7/8/07, Kim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I had 100% working jquery code throughout my site, but
upon updating to the newest version, a TON of stuff is
no longer working.
this helped to resolve a lot of sticky animation bugs
that existed.
--John
On 7/5/07, Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Resig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a quick bug fix release for jQuery 1.1.3. About six major
issues popped up
, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
This is a quick bug fix release for jQuery 1.1.3. About six major
issues popped up after the 1.1.3 release that we deemed important
enough to resolve immediately, with a follow-up release. The full list
of resolved issues can be found here
Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We
really wanted to keep the extensible functionality of [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it
ended up being just to incredibly slow. Moving all of the code
internal was the only way to receive any sort of speed up. Sorry about
that guys.
You can download jQuery from SVN and build your own copy. If you were
to open the Makefile that's included with jQuery you'd see a list of
files that are to be included in jQuery directly - you can then remove
the Ajax and FX modules and build a new copy. I realize that this is
convoluted, and
...
Is it possible to attach an else to the if statement that replaced
it[1] that checks in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 05/07/07, Aaron Heimlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/5/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, this was a really unfortunate change that had to be made. We
really wanted
Oh man, I'll need a night out after signing all those pictures :-P
--John
On 7/5/07, Glen Lipka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder, the first million respondents get a night out on the town
with John Resig.
Survey is very short and helps out the whole community.
http
Do you realize that you can do this now? There's already a .animate()
function, you don't need any of the 1.2 functionality for that.
SlideDown: .animate({ height: 'show' });
SlideUp: .animate({ height: 'hide });
SlideRight: .animate({ width: 'show' });
SlideLeft: .animate({ width: 'hide' });
to reveal the element from the bottom to top.
I could be wrong but I don't see how I can achieve this.
Thanks for the quick answer and thanks for a great lib.
On 5 Jul., 02:20, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you realize that you can do this now? There's already a .animate()
function, you don't
You have to check the length property, so do something like this:
// No div matches the selector was found
if ( !parentDiv.length ) {
// Do something else
}
--John
On 7/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
var parentDiv = $([EMAIL PROTECTED]@id=+obj.id+]/..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]);
Hi Everyone -
This is a quick bug fix release for jQuery 1.1.3. About six major
issues popped up after the 1.1.3 release that we deemed important
enough to resolve immediately, with a follow-up release. The full list
of resolved issues can be found here:
http://dev.jquery.com/report/16
You can
$(#container element.class:not(.class2))
Enjoy!
--John
On 7/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to be able to select all elements in a container except
element.class2 for example, is that possible?
Thanks... haven't found any docs on this!
] wrote:
I see. It doesn't appear to work for elements that have two classes :
(
div class=class1 class2/div for instance
On Jul 3, 6:40 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(#container element.class:not(.class2))
Enjoy!
--John
On 7/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
In which browser does this problem occur?
--John
On 7/2/07, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same problem here
something like that does'nt work with 1.1.3 :
javascript:alert($('div').css({opacity: '0.5'}))
The API for 1.1.3 is identical to 1.1.2, you shouldn't have to worry.
--John
On 7/2/07, Charlie Concepcion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see there is api reference browser for 1.1.2... when is the one for
1.1.3 coming out?
On Jul 2, 10:52 am, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jQuery v1.1.3
Brandon just committed a fix for this to SVN. If you could try it, and
let us know if it works for you, that'd be good (if you can).
http://code.google.com/p/jquery
--John
On 7/2/07, Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I updated my main jquery.js file today updating my
I'm confused - are you saying the Konquerer breaks because of the
regexp, or that the regexp breaks in Konquerer?
--John
On 7/2/07, Michael Schuerig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to report this here, but the site appears to be largely
non-functional due to the popularity of the recent
That's great to hear, Shelane!
--John
On 7/2/07, Shelane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evidently my presentation went well. My boss went by our new group
today (they actually work in a different building than us) and saw
that two of them had the jQuery site up on their screen, they had
already
It's pointing to the right one, you have to click the blog post itself
- it's a little bit wonky.
--John
On 7/2/07, Shelane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this digg link has gotten 1392 diggs as of this writing:
http://digg.com/programming/jQuery_1_1_3_800_Faster_still_20KB
the one on the blog
Experience conferences.
http://ajaxexperience.techtarget.com/
At the San Francisco Ajax Experience, John Resig will be giving an
introductory overview to jQuery followed by an advanced jQuery talk.
Glen Lipka will be giving a talk on designing with jQuery.
At the Boston Ajax Experience, John
I've had with the 1.1.3 alpha.
Digg it:
http://www.digg.com/programming/jQuery_1_1_3_final_is_out
-Peter
On Jul 1, 9:45 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone -
I'm pleased to announce the release of jQuery 1.1.3. After many months
of testing, developing, and more testing, we have
The solution is what Klaus posted - you just have to use :first-child.
$(td:first-child).addClass(tomas);
--John
On 6/8/07, jorgeBadaBing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking online at the documentation and don't seen to have
any luck find a way of doing this.
So far I can do this:
Err, I meant Karl - sorry!
On 6/30/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The solution is what Klaus posted - you just have to use :first-child.
$(td:first-child).addClass(tomas);
--John
On 6/8/07, jorgeBadaBing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking online at the documentation
The site is fine for me.
--John
On 6/29/07, Massimiliano Marini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has noticed it?
--
Massimiliano Marini - http://www.linuxtime.it/massimilianomarini/
It's easier to invent the future than to predict it. -- Alan Kay
Do you have an example page where this is occurring? This will help us
to diagnose the problem better.
--John
On 6/28/07, cfdvlpr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas on why this happens and what I should do differently so that
I don't have this problem? Should I just put all the Jquery code
Rey sent this to the list accidentally.
Just to clarify for everyone: We're working on some more plugins that
we'll be announcing soon. Interface is still an official plugin and
nothing is changing in this respect.
Expect to see more information about the upcoming releases later this week.
, MikeR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok great, John =). Thanks for the update.
On May 15, 12:43 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're still dealing with site issues, hopefully this weekend, but
again, that's what I said last week before the attack.
--John
On 5/15/07, MikeR [EMAIL
They're both just as fast as each other - jQuery has an optimization
in place to account for that.
Terry: I assume that you mean div#TimelineContainer in your first example.
--John
On 6/27/07, Diego A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure, but I'm guessing there will be some sort of
Huh, yeah - that's weird - it stops at four and doesn't continue. Also
look at Layout (which should have 7) which also only has 4.
I'm CC'ing Mike into this so that he can spot it as well.
--John
On 6/27/07, MathiasBank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
It seems, that there is an error at
Didn't the solution from the other email thread work?
jQuery(form).filter(function(){
return jQuery(this).attr(coop:manage) == true;
});
But yes, this is a pretty easy fix - I'll try to get it in for 1.1.3,
so you'll be able to do:
jQuery([EMAIL PROTECTED]:manage=true])
--John
On 6/26/07,
/wiki/JQuery
...has a link to John Resig, but no article has been written.
Considering Wikipedia's guidelines, I think John is a notable enough
subject to go into an encyclopedia, being the founder of jQuery.
What do you all think?
--
.|..
Scott Trudeau
scott.trudeau AT gmail DOT com
I compiled a list similar to this a week ago, with viable solutions.
There's a couple areas that we're hurting on (Tree, Grid, Layout,
WYSIWYG), but other than that, we're pretty well off. Not bad for a
community grown from the ground up:
http://docs.jquery.com/Widgets
--John
On 6/26/07, John
Just to clarify: This was an issue in jQuery 1.1.3a - we've fixed the
code in jQuery to fall back to 'linear' if it exists (thus causing the
code to work, no problem). This fix is in SVN right now and will be in
the final 1.1.3 release.
--John
On 6/24/07, Gilles (Webunity) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dimitii -
Those results are really interesting - you should post them to the jQuery
Dev list (where we discuss issues like selector speed).
More information about the list can be found here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Discussion
--John
On 6/22/07, Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide an example of the code? I'm not sure what you're
trying to do from your description. (If I had to guess, I'd say that
you're trying to pass an element to filter, but I'm not sure why.)
--John
On 6/20/07, Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I build up a list of elements by
Possibly - file a bug on it and we might be able to get to it for jQuery 1.2.
On 6/20/07, jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to change this behavior in jQuery so that the $
(document).bind('ready'... and unbind methods work (more) like other
events?
thanks, Jim
Not yet - we should have the final version of 1.1.3 released very soon
- at which point we'll have all the versions available for use.
--John
On 6/18/07, Byron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi John, worked like a treat,
is there a compressed version available?
On Jun 18, 5:29 pm, John Resig
the French jQuery site:
http://jquery.info/)
--John
On 6/17/07, Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some more infos about what is planned there ?
John Resig wrote:
When:
Sunday, June 24, 2007 - 10:30 AM
Where:
Hotel Helder Opera
4, Rue du Helder
Paris, Île-de-France 75009
Byron -
You should give jQuery 1.1.3a a try. This was one of the nasty bugs
that we were able to resolve in it:
http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.1.3a.js
Let me know if that code helps to solve your problem.
--John
On 6/17/07, Byron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,
I tried setting it in the
Yeah, the server was having some difficulties, it should be back up in a minute.
--John
On 6/12/07, traunic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here, another DOS attack? But then the ping would fail right?
The dev list is back up - I was able to get it back up and running
last week. You can find it here:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev
--John
On 6/11/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's release 0.1 ... more sample and code to follow. If we had a dev list, I
would have posted there
Ok - I just opened the gates, apparently everything was getting
moderated. Sorry about that!
--John
On 6/11/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John, I posted once... it never went through! 2 posts came out from the
list... but that's all. perhaps it's clogged??
On 6/11/07, John Resig [EMAIL
It appears to be an honest mistake. I only see what you mention on
Google Groups, in my email client they are completely separate
threads, I wouldn't worry about it.
--John
On 6/5/07, dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Haggerty changed my original post title, and hijacked for his
drupal
There's even less need for us to do this now, since Google has done
all the hard work for us. (Also, Dojo is only using Google's framework
if it exists, nothing more.)
Although, this sounds like a great opportunity to write a plugin
around Google Gears.
--John
On 5/31/07, jamon [EMAIL
I think the fool-proof way would be to do something like adding a
class, for example:
$(input.text:not(.focused)).focus(function(){ ... }).addClass(focused);
That way you can run that line as many times as you want and it'll
never re-bind the focus event.
--John
On 5/31/07, John R [EMAIL
Great work Klaus. It's been fun watching Plazes grow up with jQuery.
I'll just echo the thoughts of others in this thread concerning the
user experience - you guys have done an excellent job! Keep up the
great work.
--John
On 5/30/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I have the
Quick note: The main problem with Prototype is that is tries to turn
Javascript into Java. isn't terribly correct - if anything, they're
trying to make JavaScript behave more like Ruby (since it's primarily
used by users of Ruby on Rails, and written to help those users as
such.)
--John
On
I think I recognize the bug that you're talking about, and I'm fairly
certain it was fixed in 1.1.3a. Let us know once you've had an opportunity
to verify this.
--John
On 5/30/07, Luc Pestille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl - I'm using 1.1.2 (from the front page of jQuery.com) - I'll try
I still have three global functions while I'm looking for alternatives
in the jQuery world. I'm looking for something that helps extending
classes / overriding class members in jQuery or any jQuery
plugin/utility. Something like the extend() function in YUI or Ext. Is
there any?
You mean like
Do you think you could find a test case for this? We were under the
assumption that this method was fairly rock-solid, but what you
describe sounds like a reproducible flaw. If you can make one, please
post it to the bug tracker.
--John
On 5/28/07, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you test it against the test suite? And did you test it for speed
changes? The reason why this is being done, in the first place, is
purely for speed reasons. Added extra checks or loops significantly
slows down the speed of jQuery selectors. The mergeNum technique is
the fastest means of
Enos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there still the possibility of a final release this week?
I've tested against the basics and some of my more complicated internal apps
and all is working well.
On 5/24/07 1:10 PM, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you test it against the test suite
I have to admit that I haven't found a faster solution.
removeAttribute() just takes to much time. So perhaps the serializer
should be fixed. This would mean a slow down for Internet Explorer
on html(), but this seems ok for me, as this is a Internet Explorer
bug.
That's absolutely a
That's an option with Google Groups too - but it'll require a lot of
work on our (jQuery team) end. It does seem like the more-ideal
solution, if we really want no spam.
--John
On 5/22/07, Bil Corry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christof Donat wrote on 5/22/2007 12:28 AM:
I don't know, what
Actually, that's a good idea. You're now a manager of the group - and
messages from new members are now moderated. Go to town!
--John
On 5/22/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John, if that is something you can trust someone that is not part of the
jQuery team to handle, I would
Haha - if the # of subscribers starts to drop drastically, I'll know why :)
--John
On 5/22/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sweet, is this where I start my maniacal laughter. no, power does not go to
my head quickly :)
On 5/22/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Any luck with the latest 1.1.3a build?
--John
On 5/21/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The show method completely fails in Konqueror. Does anybody know if this
is fixed with later SVN versions? I'm using the official 1.1.2 release.
It worked before, so it should be fixable, and
Hi Everyone -
A test build of the upcoming 1.1.3 release is ready for everyone to
try. We need to be super-sure that there haven't been any regressions
in this release, and in order to do that we'd like you to download
this alpha release and try it in place of jQuery 1.1.2 (wherever you
may be
Well, that's just weird; definitely trying to make $ with adwords.
This is the type of thing that you can ban a site for.
Here's what everyone can do:
1) Go to the site and click Ads by Google in the Adsense block.
2) Click the Send Google your thoughts on the site or the ads you
just saw link
Isn't that what .hover() does?
$(...).hover(function(){
$(this).addClass(hilite);
}, function(){
$(this).removeClass(hilite);
});
--John
On 5/17/07, Remy Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written a plugin that will fire a mouseout when the mouse leaves
the container DIV, rather than
I haven't had the opportunity to set it up yet - that along with the
dev and web lists. I'll be moving them to Google Groups shortly.
--John
On 5/16/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the plug-in mailing list still alive? I'm writing a plug-in and I've
got some questions I'd
This problem is resolved in jQuery SVN. It'll be included in jQuery
1.1.3 (which should be coming out this weekend).
--John
On 5/16/07, billhowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following script throws the error
this.getElementsByTagName is not a function
using the current jquery release.
? You mentioned a few things
related to faster selectors, animations, etc. What bug fixes might
we see? IE issues?
Why is IE always the problem child? Oh yeah, M$. OK, off my soapbox
now.
On Apr 26, 7:21 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John! Wow :) Did not expect you
It's in the process of being moved over to Google Groups. I'll be sure
to let everyone know when that process is complete.
--John
On 5/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jquery dev list archives available here
http://docs.jquery.com/Discussion#Archives
doesn't seem to be
There's more to the story than this, however. The jQuery ready()
implementation was very very different in June of 2006 (hence the
problems with script elements). I think the reason why Swfobject
causes problems is that it's not coded very well - hence the reason
for a jQuery Flash plugin. Is
Nope! jQuery uses only one timer for all animations now (even across
multiple elements). It helps drastically, with performance.
--John
On 5/13/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest SVN uses only one timer per an element but there currently
is not a way to animate several
$(span.email).each(function(){
$(this).html( $(this).html().replace(at,@) );
});
$(p.jhide).hide();
Not too bad!
--John
On 5/13/07, fambizzari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started using jquery a month or two ago and i've spent the time
since then working on non js content. I've now come to
The bug tracker is back up again - feel free to add this as a bug!
--John
On 5/9/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree then, it is inconsistent. Once I get the bug tracker up, this
should go in.
--John
On 5/9/07, Arrix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The .removeClass() behavior is good
I understand that one way of doing the same thing in jQuery is to
reference it thus: var element = $(p#thisIsMyParagraph)[0];
IS THIS CORRECT? Is there a more correct way, or is this the only
way?
You're spot-on. That is the correct way to get a reference to the
original DOM node.
--John
Can you provide a URL for where this is happening? It will help us to
debug the problem.
--John
On 5/11/07, browntown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the replies...I've tried every variation provided on the
using jquery with other libraries page...still no dice.
I still receive the
The dev list is down right now, the move to the new server has take a
toll on us.
--John
On 5/11/07, bhagany [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried making a ticket in the bug tracker, and it seemed to work, but
it's not showing up when I try to view the ticket reports. I'm kind
of new at this -
Yes, Google Code supports https.
--John
On 5/10/07, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 9, 6:14 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jQuery subversion repository was moved to Google Code yesterday,
so you can reference it there, at least:http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn
something. If it's been fixed, then I'll be sure to
give a new version a go around though.
Thanks.
Brian
On May 9, 10:21 am, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of jQuery are you using? I'm fairly certain that this use
to be a problem in a really-old version of jQuery, but it's
Mario -
${...} doesn't, currently, exist in jQuery. Did you find an example
somewhere that showed it as working? (It needs to be fixed.)
--John
On 5/9/07, Mario Moura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks
I am trying $(img).attr(title, ${this.src});
So :
$(img).attr(title,
] wrote:
Now I see you John Resig. I feel honored talk with you. Congratulations and
tanks for all.
Regards
Mario
2007/5/9, Mario Moura [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok I found here:
http://www.visualjquery.com
attr(key, value) --- Example
But fortunately I found my mistake:
Will work like
Very nice, I know that I could use this in a bunch of my layouts.
Silly CSS and your box model.
--John
On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've posted this to the discussion list once before, but now I've put
together a simple demo page for my equalize column heights
No, that's expected. removeClass() was re-worked such that
.removeClass(one) would remove one class, .removeClass(one two)
would remove two classes, and .removeClass() would remove all classes.
This is very similar to how .unbind() works (if you call it with no
arguments, it removes all bound
The jQuery subversion repository was moved to Google Code yesterday,
so you can reference it there, at least:
http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/
--John
On 5/9/07, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the plugins are available (latest svn version) in this temporary
location:
Yep! All the details are updated on the wiki:
http://docs.jquery.com/Downloading_jQuery
--John
On 5/9/07, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so I change
svn co svn://jquery.com/trunk/jquery;
to
svn co svn://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/jquery;
?
On 5/9/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED
;
?
On 5/9/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The jQuery subversion repository was moved to Google Code yesterday,
so you can reference it there, at least:
http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/
--John
On 5/9/07, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All
I agree completely.
Currently, we have a pretty weak selection of demos:
http://docs.jquery.com/Demos
Sean and Andy - wanna login and flush out the list with what you think
would make for good demos? (You don't actually have to build the
demos, unless you want to - it'll just help us to get a
Excellent :-) Yeah, being able to go through http/https is a nice side
effect of this. At the very least, we'll still be able to commit code
if (when) jQuery.com is down.
--John
On 5/9/07, Brian Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John,
Thank you! By moving to Google Code, you've obliquely
|| );
On 5/10/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, that's expected. removeClass() was re-worked such that
.removeClass(one) would remove one class, .removeClass(one two)
would remove two classes, and .removeClass() would remove all classes.
This is very similar to how .unbind() works (if you
a little bit of spare time and
have some exp setting trac up.
On 5/9/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent :-) Yeah, being able to go through http/https is a nice side
effect of this. At the very least, we'll still be able to commit code
if (when) jQuery.com is down.
--John
On 5
Thank you for providing the alternate repositories. You might want to
put this information on the official jQuery site. Or at least make it
more prominent if it's there. I've been poking about the web for some
time and didn't find it. Sorry to hear about the recent misfortunes
with the official
Out of curiosity, how are you planning on dealing with the fact that Trac
doesn't support remote repositories[1]?
[1]http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracFaq#can-i-use-trac-with-a-remote-subversion-repository
It's actually really really easy with SVN 1.4 - you use svnsync to
pull down a copy of
Sounds like a plan (I really like Trac's timeline and diff viewer, which is
why I asked)
As do I - which is why I wouldn't have moved to Google Code unless I
knew this was an option.
--John
401 - 500 of 527 matches
Mail list logo
