James Duberg wrote:
> First, thanks to all involved in LEAF. I've been using it, in one form
> or another for a few years now in my small business, and at home. It is
> great!
If it's been good for your work, we have a testimonial page we
just started that could use a few contribs.
> I've do
guitarlynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I run some mailing lists and use demime to strip html
>> and other crap out of incoming submissions, both to
/snip/
>> It is my understanding that the latest AOL mail
>> program is incapable of sending email that is NOT html.
> hehe, you can't connect
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=523277&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned
This is a really basic question, but one that has plagued me for a while.
My wife is behind a double NAT setup at school.
Her provider givers her an 10.100.x.x IP address, which, of course makes
Eigerstein ipchains default rules unhappy.
I commented out the rules that apply to blocking 10.100.x.
First, thanks to all involved in LEAF. I've been using it, in one form
or another for a few years now in my small business, and at home. It is
great!
I've downloaded the 1680 disk image, and it works great. I've deleted a
bunch of stuff that I don't think I'll need, so I think what is left
wi
I connected my lrp router to one RAS. I get the Remote IPs and i get
connected. But the RAS has been configurated to give RADIUS Attributes as
DNS IPs servers, and one route for the routing table.
My lrp can not get the RADIUS Attributes.
Someone have some idea
regards ccntv1
_
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 17:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=512515&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned t
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-27 00:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=523277&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigne
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-27 00:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=523277&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned t
Thanks for your reply Eric,
> Good to hear that :=)
Yes, Yes it is - Even better now that the problem is solved -! You
know what it was??
Initialization String!!! It Stump't me Good and Proper!! Here is my Settings
Now!
> /etc/ppp/peers/provider
>
> kdebug 1
> debug
> lock
> noauth
> de
On Monday 18 March 2002 08:29, Joey Officer wrote:
> Lets see...
> The other morning I came to work and noticed that the WinNT4 machine
> had a message saying that it could not obtain a lease automagically,
> but that everything was temporarily fine, because I still had an IP.
> I left it for aw
On Monday 18 March 2002 14:26, Gary Dodge wrote:
> I have two port forwarding rules, they are in the port forwarding
> section of the network.conf file, for some reason they will not load
> from boot, but they work fine if I enter them at the command prompt.
> I can't find any errors in my log f
On Monday 18 March 2002 14:15, William F. Dudley Jr. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run some mailing lists and use demime to strip html and other
> crap out of incoming submissions, both to the list proper
> and to the list-request address.
>
> It is my understanding that the latest AOL mail program is
> inca
On Monday 18 March 2002 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will need to load "ip_masq_portfw.o", and make sure that
you have opened the "www" tcp port and used the port forwarding
syntax in /etc/network.conf like:
INTERN_SERVERS="tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_www_192.168.1.1_www
> Initial Comment:
> I'm r
On Monday 18 March 2002 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have read all of the docs for my distib of leaf
> (Dachstein) and am still having some trouble. I
> downloaded the RTL8139.o module for my nic cards and
> placed them in /lib/modules and added it to the
> /etc/modules config file. Th
On Monday 18 March 2002 17:35, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Everyone,
> Does the comment below describe the correct procedure for port
> forwarding in Dachstein? If so, I'll close the support request.
Kind of rightuse this to forward the port:
INTERN_SERVERS="tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_www_192.168.1.1_www
-
Everyone,
Does the comment below describe the correct procedure for port forwarding
in Dachstein? If so, I'll close the support request.
At 2002-03-18 12:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08
>You can respond by visiting:
>http://sourc
Support Requests item #528127, was opened at 2002-03-10 06:58
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=528127&group_id=13751
>Category: Release/Branch: Bering
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (
Support Requests item #524646, was opened at 2002-03-01 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=524646&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous
Updated with a 2.4.18 linux kernel & shorewall 1.2.9. Check:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/article.php?sid=31
Enjoy
Jacques & Eric
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
I have two port forwarding rules, they are in the port forwarding section of
the network.conf file, for some reason they will not load from boot, but
they work fine if I enter them at the command prompt. I can't find
any errors in my log files, are they in the wrong place, how would I track
this
At 2002-03-18 15:15 -0500, William F. Dudley Jr. wrote:
>I run some mailing lists and use demime to strip html and other
>crap out of incoming submissions, both to the list proper
>and to the list-request address.
Bill,
Demime and stripmime are only available to list admins. I'm just a lowly
lis
Support Requests item #529085, was opened at 2002-03-12 11:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=529085&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous
Hi,
I run some mailing lists and use demime to strip html and other
crap out of incoming submissions, both to the list proper
and to the list-request address.
It is my understanding that the latest AOL mail program is
incapable of sending email that is NOT html.
Bill Dudley
> At 2002-03-18 09:
Support Requests item #529085, was opened at 2002-03-12 11:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=529085&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=523277&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Support Requests item #523277, was opened at 2002-02-26 22:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=523277&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Support Requests item #529085, was opened at 2002-03-12 11:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=529085&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Support Requests item #528127, was opened at 2002-03-10 06:58
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=528127&group_id=13751
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to:
Support Requests item #512515, was opened at 2002-02-03 15:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=512515&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Support Requests item #524646, was opened at 2002-03-01 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=524646&group_id=13751
Category: Release/Branch: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (n
At 2002-03-18 10:56 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
> >Alternate Support:
> >If your employer attaches a footer to all outgoing mail that isn't
> >text/plain, you may submit a support request using the LEAF Tracker [2].
>
>Please forgive my usual absent mindedness ... but what actually happens
>when s
[...]
>
>>NOTE: I removed the part about creating a SF support request. The
>>mail list works the way we as a group decide it should...there should't
>>be an SF support request just because someone can't post with their
>>favorite HTML stationary, add GIF smiley's, or whatever...
>
>I added the
At 2002-03-18 09:50 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Is this change to draconian?
>
>I don't think this is draconian, but you can probably save yourself
>some list admin work.
>
>I suggest some additions to the auto-responder e-mail:
Charles,
Unfortunately, there is nothing auto about the r
At 2002-03-18 07:51 -0800, Ray Olszewski wrote:
>Plain text attachments might be fine. I personally prefer "a long
>inline attachments" myself, but that's a matter of taste. In any case,
>there are other types of attachment, such as MS Word .doc files, that
>create both potential security problems
> Is this change to draconian?
I don't think this is draconian, but you can probably save yourself some
list admin work.
I suggest some additions to the auto-responder e-mail:
1) Indicate that attachments (other than a GPG signature) are not allowed,
and instead should be included in-line with
Plain text attachments might be fine. I personally prefer "a long inline
attachments" myself, but that's a matter of taste. In any case, there are
other types of attachment, such as MS Word .doc files, that create both
potential security problems (for Windows users) and inconvenience (for Linux
us
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/18/2002 09:09:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Phillip Watts/austin/Nlynx)
Subject: [Leaf-user] List Manager filters
Is this change to draconian?
Works for me.
___
Leaf-user mailin
* Mike Noyes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Everyone,
> I'm filtering our leaf-user list on header Content-Type. The only two types
> that post without getting flagged for administrative action are:
> text/plain, and multipart/signed. Note: this means that posts with
> attachments will not reach
Subject was: Sudo in Cgi
At 2002-03-17 18:56 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
> Mike Noyes sent mail to Phillip and me off the
>list explaining how he's doing some behind the scenes
>moderating of leaf-user to filter out html posts and
>whatever else is on his list of no-nos. It was news
>to me, bu
I am close to getting Bering and Dachstein working together to provide an IPSec
gateway using x.509 certificates. I am getting errors in the auth.log file (attached
inline) that say "no RSA public key known for " What do I do
to solve this? I have attached both the log and the instructions I
> My configuration is as follows.
>
> EXTERN_IP=111.222.333.444
> EXTERN_IF =eth0
> INTERNAL_IP=10.24.33.224
> INTERNAL_IF =eth1
> INT_NET = 10.0.0.0/8
> IPFWDING_KERNEL= FILTER_ON
> IPALWAYSDEFRAG_KERNEL = YES
> CONFIG_HOSTNAME = YES
> CONFIG_HOSTSFILE = YES
> CONFIG_DNS = NO
> IPFILTER_SWITCH =
Hi,
Thanks to you all for reply. But sorry for not replying early since I was out on
vacation.
Dear Ray here are the answers of your Q's:
Q1: Is the Web server on the Win2K server (or workstation) configured
correctly? (Can you access it from the LAN, using its actual LAN IP
address?) Passing
43 matches
Mail list logo
